DOCSLIB.ORG

SEPARATION and DIVORCE a Listing of Materials Available at the Justice Institute Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEPARATION and DIVORCE a Listing of Materials Available at the Justice Institute Library SEPARATION AND DIVORCE A listing of materials available at the Justice Institute Library GENERAL BOOKS S E Being Dad: Fathering After Separation or Divorce by Steve Van Bakel. Calgary, AB: Tall Tales Press. (HQ 759.915 V297 2006) P A Best Practices in Parent Information and Education Programs After Separation and Divorce: Final Report for Family Mediation completed by Brenda Bacon and Brad McKenzie. Waterloo, ON: R Family Mediation Canada. (HQ 811 B233 2001) A Between Love and Hate: A Guide to Civilized Divorce by Lois Gold. New York, NY: Plenum Press. T (HQ 834 G65 1992) I O Collaborative Practice: Deepening the Dialogue by Nancy J. Cameron. Vancouver, BC: Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia. (KE 539 C34 2004) N The Divorce Culture by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead. New York, NY: Vintage Books. (HQ 834 W575 1998) A N Divorced Fathers: Children's Needs and Parental Responsibilities by Edward Kruk. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Pub. (HQ 756 K783 2011) D Family Justice Services Manual of Operations. Victoria, BC: Family Justice Services Division, D Ministry of Attorney General. (HQ 814 B7 2003+) (Available online) http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/justice-services/publications/fjsd/policy/manual.pdf I V The Family Justice System: A Review of the Metrics and Impacts of Separation and Divorce. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Attorney General, Justice Services Branch, Family Justice Services O Division. (KEB 194 F244 2006) http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/justice-services/publications/fjsd/divorce/metrics.pdf R C For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered by Mavis Hetherington and John Kelly. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. (HQ 814 H474 2002) E The Good Divorce: Keeping Your Family Together When Your Marriage Falls Apart by Constance Ahrons. New York, NY: HarperCollins. (HQ 834 A67 1994) Living Together, Living Apart: Common-Law Relationships, Marriage, Separation, and Divorce. Vancouver, BC: Legal Services Society of BC (KEB 194 L58 2007) http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/PubDocs/bcdocs/409555/ltla.pdf 715 McBride Blvd New Westminster, BC V3L 5T4 Phone: 604.528.5599 www.jibc.ca SEPARATION AND DIVORCE Men on Divorce: Conversations with Ex-Husbands by Ellie Wymard. Carson, CA: Hay House. (HQ 814 W96 1994) Painful Partings: Divorce and Its Aftermath by Lita Linzer Schwartz and Florence W. Kaslow. New York, NY: J. Wiley. (HQ 814 S38 1997) Separating Together: How Divorce Transforms Families by Abigail J. Stewart. New York, NY: Guilford Press. (HQ 834 S46 1997) The Separation Guide: Know Your Options, Take Control, and Get Your Life Back by David Greig. North Vancouver, BC: Self-Counsel Press. (HQ 838 G74 2011) The Smart Divorce: Proven Strategies and Valuable Advice from 100 Top Divorce Lawyers, Financial Advisers, Counselors, and Other Experts by Deborah Moskovitch. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press. (HQ 834 M675 2007) Therapy of the Difficult Divorce: Managing Crises, Reorienting Warring Couples, Working with the Children, and Expediting Court Processes by Marla Beth Isaacs, Braulio Montalvo, and David Abelsohn. Northvale, NJ: J. Aronson. (RC 488.6 I83 2000) Tug of War: A Judge's Verdict on Separation, Custody Battles, and the Bitter Realities of Family Court by Harvey Brownstone. Toronto, ON: ECW Press. (KE 539 B76 2009) Uncoupling: Lessons on the Reconfiguration of an Intimate Relationship by Brenda Woolner. Thetis Island, BC: Windshift Press. (HQ 814 W66 2003) The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study by Judith Wallerstein, Julia Lewis, and Sandra Blakeslee. New York, NY: Hyperion. (HQ 834 W356 2000) Women and Divorce/Men and Divorce: Gender Differences in Separation, Divorce, and Remarriage edited by Sandra S. Volgy. New York, NY: Haworth Press. (HQ 834 W677 1991) CHILDREN OF DIVORCE - BOOKS 101 Ways to Be a Long-Distance Super Dad-- or Mom, Too! by George Newman. Tucson, AZ: Blossom Valley Press. (HQ 759.915 N25 2008) Because Life Goes On: Helping Children and Youth Live With Separation and Divorce: A Guide for Parents by Natacha Joubert. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada. (HQ 777.5 J683 1994) Between Two Worlds: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce by Elizabeth Marquardt. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press. (HQ 777.5 M3746 2005) Caught in the Middle: Protecting the Children of High-Conflict Divorce by Carla B. Garrity and Mitchell A. Baris. Toronto, ON: Maxwell Macmillan. (HQ 834 G38 1994) Children Come First: Mediation, Not Litigation When Marriage Ends by Howard H. Irving. Toronto, ON: Dundurn Press. (HQ 814 I783 2011) 2 SEPARATION AND DIVORCE Coparenting After Divorce: A GPS for Healthy Kids by Debra K. Carter. Scottsdale, AZ: Unhooked Books. (HQ 777.5 C368 2015) Divorce and the Next Generation: Perspectives for Young Adults in the New Millennium edited by Craig A. Everett. New York, NY: Haworth Clinical Practice Press. (HQ 799.5 D57 2001) Divorce Poison: How to Protect Your Family from Bad-Mouthing and Brainwashing by Richard A. Warshak. New York, NY: Harper. (HQ 777.5 W37 2010) Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths by Sanford L. Braver and Diane O’Connell. New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam. (HQ 756 B733 1998) Don't Alienate the Kids! Raising Resilient Children While Avoiding High Conflict Divorce by Bill Eddy. Scottsdale, AZ: High Conflict Institute. (HQ 777.5 E32 2010) The Effects of Divorce on Children: A Selected Literature Review. Ottawa, ON: Department of Justice Canada. (HQ 777.5 E344 1997) Healing Hearts: Helping Children and Adults Recover from Divorce by Elizabeth Hickey and Elizabeth A. Dalton. Carson City, NV: Gold Leaf Press. (HQ 777.5 H53 1994) Helping Children Cope with Divorce by Edward Teyber. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (HQ 777.5 T49 2001) Helping Your Kids Cope with Divorce the Sandcastles Way by M. Gary Neuman and Patricia Romanowski. New York, NY: Random House. (HQ 777.5 N48 1998) In the Name of the Child: A Developmental Approach to Understanding and Helping Children of Conflicted and Violent Divorce by Janet R. Johnston and Vivienne Roseby. New York, NY: Springer Pub. (RJ 507 D59 J64 2009) Marital Transitions and Children’s Adjustment: Understanding Why Families Differ from One Another and Why Children in the Same Family Show Different Patterns of Adjustment by Thomas G. O’Connor and Jennifer M. Jenkins. Hull, QC: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada. (HQ 777.5 O235 2000) http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=109862&sl=0 My Mom and Dad are Getting A Divorce by Florence Bienenfeld. Saint Paul, MN: EMC Corp. (HQ 834 B53 1980) Parenting After Divorce: Resolving Conflicts and Meeting Your Children’s Needs by Philip M. Stahl. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers. (HQ 777.5 S72 2007) Parenting After Separation: A Handbook for Parents. Victoria, BC: Queen's Printer for British Columbia. (HQ 839 B7 P277 2013) http://parenting.familieschange.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/pashandbook.pdf Parenting Apart: How Separated and Divorced Parents Can Raise Happy and Secure Kids by Christina McGhee. New York, NY: Berkley Books. (HQ 759.915 M394 2010) 3 SEPARATION AND DIVORCE Parents Forever: Parent Handbook: Education for Families in Transition by Ellie M. McCann, Heather M. Lee, and Sharon E. Powell. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Service. (HQ 777.5 P274 2014) Putting Children First: A Guide for Parents Breaking Up by Hanna McDonough and Christina Bartha. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. (HQ 814 M136 1999) Putting Children First: Proven Parenting Strategies for Helping Children Thrive through Divorce by JoAnne Pedro-Carroll. New York, NY: Avery. (HQ 777.5 P43 2010) The Relationships Among Post-Divorce Custody Arrangement, Parental Conflict, and Young Adult Psychological Functioning by Nancy A. McKenna. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. (HQ 777.5 M157 1998) Surviving the Breakup: How Children and Parents Cope with Divorce by Judith S. Wallerstein. New York, NY: Basic Books. (HQ 834 W36 1980) Surviving Your Parents’ Divorce: A Guide for Young Canadians by Michael G. Cochrane. Toronto, ON: John Wiley. (HQ 814 C624 1999) Toxic Divorce: A Workbook for Alienated Parents by Kathleen M. Reay. Penticton, BC: Dr. Kathleen M. Reay Inc. (RJ 506 P27 R43 2011) The Truth About Children and Divorce: Dealing with the Emotions so You and Your Children Can Thrive by Robert E. Emery. New York, NY: Viking. (HQ 759.915 E64 2004) We’re Still Family: What Grown Children Have to Say About Their Parents’ Divorce by Constance Ahrons. New York, NY: HarperCollins. (HQ 834 A675 2004) What Happens Next? Information for Kids About Separation and Divorce. Ottawa, ON: Dept. of Justice. (HQ 814 W438 2007) http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/collection_2007/jus/J2-215-2007E.pdf CHILDREN OF DIVORCE - DVDs D1990 Children: The Experts on Divorce (DVD, 38 minutes) The children in this program speak from their experience of going through their parents’ divorce. Their experiences represent the bulk of the research findings relating to what children need from their parents in a divorce. Created for parents who want to learn what children think about divorce and what children need from their parents during and after separation. (Family Connections Publishing Co.) (HQ 814 C554 1994) 4 SEPARATION AND DIVORCE D828 How to Divorce & Not Wreck the Kids (DVD, 42 minutes) Parents contemplating divorce are barraged with divorce from hell stories the kind that leave children scarred for life. But there is another reality. Grass roots Canadians are at the heart of a quiet revolution couples working on good divorces, which acknowledge that the end of a marriage isn’t the end of a family. This program goes directly into the heart of one of the most emotionally devastating life transitions, as three courageous Canadian couples, determined to keep the needs of their children front and centre, separate on camera. (Filmwest Associates) (HQ 838 H693 2009) D1833 Kids in the Middle: Parenting After Separation for Aboriginal Communities (DVD, 13 minutes) This package of materials includes a DVD, Facilitator's guide, and Handbook for aboriginal parents, families and communities dealing with separation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2014 Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Margaret F. Brinig, Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling?, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 1426 (August 14, 2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1116 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig, Notre Dame Law School In their recent paper “Anti-Herding Regulation,” forthcoming in the Harvard Business Review,1 Ian Ayres and Joshua Mitts argue that many well-intentioned public policy regulations potentially harm rather than help situations. That is, because the rules seek to pool—or herd—groups of people, treating them as equal, they miss or mask important differences among the regulated, thus magnifying systematic risk. Anti- herding regulation, on the other hand, can produce socially beneficial information, in their words steering “both private and public actors toward better evidence-based outcomes.” Left to their own, or with various carrot-and-stick incentives, some groups, anyway, would instead fare better if allowed to separate or diverge. Ayres and Mitts buttress their case with examples from engineering (bridges collapsing because soldiers crossed them in cadences matched to the structures’ oscillations), finance (mandating only low percentages down for real estate purchasers), biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and genetic variation itself.
    [Show full text]
  • BACK to the BEST INTERESTS of the CHILD 2Nd Edition
    POLICY MONOGRAPH BACK TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD 2nd Edition TOWARDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF JOINT RESIDENCE Yuri Joakimidis BACK TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD TOWARDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF JOINT RESIDENCE Although the dispute is symbolized by a 'versus' which signifies two adverse parties at opposite poles of a line, there is in fact a third party whose interests and rights make of the line a triangle. That person, the child who is not an official party to the lawsuit but whose well- being is in the eye of the controversy, has a right to shared parenting when both are equally suited to provide it. Inherent in the express public policy is a recognition of the child's right to equal access and opportunity with both parents, the right to be guided and nurtured by both parents, the right to have major decisions made by the application of both parents' wisdom, judgement and experience. The child does not forfeit these rights when the parents divorce." Presiding Judge Dorothy T. Beasley, Georgia Court of Appeals, "In the Interest of A.R.B., a Child," July 2, 1993 A PAPER COMPILED BY THE JOINT PARENTING ASSOCIATION Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... 5 Overview.................................................................................................................... 7 The Solomon Parable ................................................................................................ 8 The Hearing............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arguments for an Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody
    The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40:33–55, 2012 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0192-6187 print / 1521-0383 online DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2011.575344 Arguments for an Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody EDWARD KRUK School of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Sixteen arguments in support of an equal parental responsibility presumption in contested child custody are presented from a child- focused perspective, and clinical and empirical evidence in support of each argument is contrasted to the conflicting evidence. These arguments are made in support of the model equal parental re- sponsibility presumption outlined in Volume 39, Number 5, of The American Journal of Family Therapy. We state our case for the equal parental responsibility presumption out- lined in Volume 39, Number 5, of The American Journal of Family Therapy, in “A Model Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody.” Given the drawbacks of the “best interests of the child” (BIOC) standard and the harms attendant to the sole custody model detailed in the earlier article, we consider that each of the sixteen arguments below is sufficient to adopt equal parental responsibility (EPR) as a viable alternative; combined, they are a powerful testament to the urgent need for law reform in the direction of equal parenting. The research studies cited in support of each argument have, for the most part, utilized large and representative samples, and overcome most of the methodological limitations of earlier research. SIXTEEN ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF EQUAL PARENTAL Downloaded by [The University of British Columbia] at 12:03 10 January 2012 RESPONSIBILITY 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Years of Family Law: a Retrospective
    611 FORTY YEARS OF FAMILY LAW: A RETROSPECTIVE Patrick Parkinson* This article presents a thematic retrospective of the past 40 years of family law in terms of the international landscape in developed countries. It examines three questions: First, whatever happened to marriage? While once marriage was central to family formation, it is no longer. Indeed, heterosexual couples have never been less interested in the idea of marriage. Secondly, whatever happened to divorce? The nature of divorce has fundamentally changed in the last forty years, largely as a consequence of the recognition that while intimate domestic partnerships may come to an end, parenthood is, for the most part, indissoluble. The ties that bind parents together remain important long after the adult relationship has ended. Thirdly, whatever happened to parenthood? Legal parenthood has become vastly more complicated than in the mid-1970s. One reason for this is the revolution in artificial reproduction techniques. A second reason is that lesbian and gay couples have, in increasing numbers, sought to raise children and demanded recognition of parental rights which are not based on genetic parenthood. These changes have had a profound impact upon modern family law. I INTRODUCTION Over a 40-year career (so far), Bill Atkin has made a substantial contribution to family law in New Zealand. His work in this field covers a large number of topics and, like most academic family lawyers, his interests have changed over time. What is consistent about Bill's work is its quality. With every issue he tackles, he brings careful scholarship and wise insights. His contributions to family law also extend far beyond New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteen Arguments in Support of Shared Parenting | Psychology Today 25.05.12 09:27
    Sixteen Arguments in Support of Shared Parenting | Psychology Today 25.05.12 09:27 It takes a personal relationship with a supervisor to supersede bad habits or biases at work. Steve M. Cohen, Ed.D., C.M.C Home Find a Therapist Topic Streams Get Help Magazine Tests Psych Basics Experts Co-Parenting After Divorce Next Post Rising to the challenge. Co-Parenting and High Conflict by Edward Kruk, Ph.D. Sixteen Arguments in Support of Shared Parenting What the Latest Research is Saying about the Best Interests of Children Subscribe to Co-Parenting After Divorce Published on April 16, 2012 by Edward Kruk, Ph.D. in Co-Parenting After Divorce Subscribe via RSS I have long maintained that a more child-focused approach to resolving parenting disputes after separation and divorce is needed to reduce harm to children and ensure their well-being. Usually, when Edward Kruk, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Social Work at the parents cannot agree on parenting matters, they take their case to a judge for a resolution. The court University of British Columbia, then applies a "best interests of the child" standard in its decision-making in regard to kids’ future living specializing in child and family policy. arrangements. The problem is, however, that this standard is extremely vague and indeterminate, more... based on projective speculation about which parent might in future be the “better” parent, and thus subject to judicial bias and error. Judges not trained in child development and family dynamics are given unfettered discretion, and this results in unpredictable outcomes based on idiosyncratic biases and subjective value judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Parental Alienation Empirical Analysis: Child Best Interests Or Parental Rights?
    Parental Alienation Empirical Analysis: Child Best Interests or Parental Rights? © Linda C Neilson, Professor Emerita, UNB, Research Associate, Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research Publication Particulars: Linda C Neilson (2018) Parental Alienation Empirical Analysis: Child Best Interests or Parental Rights? (Fredericton: Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research and Vancouver: The FREDA Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children) 2 Parental Alienation Empirical Analysis: Child Best Interests or Parental Rights? © Linda C Neilson, Professor Emerita, UNB “There is now scholarly consensus that severe alienation is abusive to children (Fidler and Bala, 2010), and is a largely overlooked form of child abuse (Bernet et al, 2010)”1 “Despite controversies among child and mental-health experts about the usefulness and scientific validity of the concept, parental alienation claims and court findings associated with them have virtually (between 2002 and 2016) exploded in Canada”2 Introduction: Vigorous debate and controversy surround the scientific validity of parental alienation diagnoses and its associated assessment tools, particularly in connection with their application in the legal system.3 While some experts contend that the concept has demonstrated scientific validity,4 many academic researchers, mental health, and child experts as well as experts in the domestic and family violence fields are expressing concern.5 In this article I explore how Canadian courts are responding to parental 1 Edward Kruk “The Impact of Parental Alienation on Children” Psychology Today posted April 25, 2013 on line. 2 Chapter 10.12.5 of Linda C. Neilson Responding to Domestic Violence in Family Law, Civil Protection & Child Protection Cases (Ottawa: CanLII, 2017) on line.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation at the World Conference in Recife
    Selections from the Recife Congress Edited by Margaret F. Brinig, University of Notre Dame, USA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAPER 1 Pension Rights by Legal Separation or Divorce in Denmark ........................................................... 3 Gitte Meldgaard Abrahamsen, Assistant Professor, University of Aalborg, Denmark PAPER 2 Gender Inequalities and Family Solidarity in Times of Crisis (deContractualisation of Family Law) .............................................................................................. 9 Prof. dr. E. Alofs (Faculty of law, Free University of Brussels) Prof. dr. A.-L Verbeke (Faculty of law, University of Leuven) Prof. dr. D. Mortelmans (Faculty of sociology, University of Antwerp) C. Defever (Faculty of sociology, University of Antwerp) PAPER 3 Upheaval in the Family Court of New Zealand: “User Pays” and Privatization .............................. 38 Bill Atkin1 PAPER 4 Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? ................................................................................ 49 Margaret F. Brinig, Notre Dame Law School PAPER 5 Marriage for Immigration in the Republic of Korea ......................................................................... 101 LEE, Dongjin PAPER 6 Children's Voices: Centre-stage or Side-lined in Out-of-Court Dispute Resolution in England and Wales? ........................................................................................................................................ 126 Jan Ewing, Research Associate at the University of Kent on the ERSC funded
    [Show full text]
  • Harding University Social Science Department Resource Room Fall 2012
    Harding University Social Science Department Resource Room Fall 2012 Those wishing to access material in the resource room may contact Terry Smith at 501-279-4561 or at [email protected]. AA 100-Agency/Administration Title Author Last Author First Year Call # Helping Others Through Teamwork: A Handbook for Professionals Garner Howard 2002 G276Hh Helping Others Through Teamwork—Training Materials Garner Howard 2002 G726Hhe When Teams Work Best LaFasto Frank 2001 L232Fw Management of Human Service Programs (3rd Edition) Lewis Judith 2001 L394Jm Management of Human Service Programs (4th Edition) Lewis Judith 2007 L394Jm Program Evaluation: An Introduction Royse David 1992 R798Dp The Social Worker as Manager: A Practical Guide to Success (5th Edition) Weinbach Robert 2008 W346Rs CM 100-Child Maltreatment (General Issues) Title Author Last Author Year Call # First The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment Briere John 1996 B843Ja Abuse and the Bible: The Scriptural Perspective Cassidy-Shaw Aimee 2002 C288Af Trauma and Sexuality: The Effects of Childhood Sexual, Physical and Emotional Abuse on Sexual Chu James 2002 C490Jt Identity and Behavior Critical Issues in Child Sexual Abuse: Historical, Legal, and Psychological Perspectives Conte Jon 2002 C768Jc Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect (5th Edition) Crosson-Tower Cynthia 2002 C868Cc Child Abuse and Neglect: A Look at the States Curtis Patrick 1995 C978Pc Manual for Mandated Reporters (Revised Edition) Department of Children & Family 2002 D238Sm Services Classic Papers in Child Abuse Donnelly
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Brotherhood of Fathers
    AUSTRALIAN BROTHERHOOD OF FATHERS Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System The Joint Select Committee on Australia's Family Law System was appointed by resolution of the Senate on 18 September 2019 and resolution of the House of Representatives on 19 September 2019. May 2020 1 Recommendations Summary ............................................................................. 4 2 The Australian Brotherhood of Fathers (ABF) ................................................... 13 2 (a) Introduction ......................................................................................... 13 2 (b) Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System. ................... 13 2 (c) The ABF ................................................................................................ 14 2 (d) Our unique perspective ........................................................................ 15 2 (e) Serve all, help all .................................................................................. 16 2 (f) Who we work with and what we do ..................................................... 16 3 The Family Law System .................................................................................... 17 3 (a) Previous Family Law Reports and Studies ............................................. 20 4 Domestic Violence ............................................................................................ 22 5 Parental Alienation ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Because Life Goes On
    Because life goes on... Helping Children and Youth LIVE with Separation and Divorce Because life goes on ... HELPING CHILDREN AND YOUTH LIVE WITH SEPARATION AND DIVORCE A GUIDE FOR PARENTS TO PROMOTE AND PROTECT THE HEALTH OF CANADIANS THROUGH LEADERSHIP, PARTNERSHIP, INNOVATION AND ACTION IN PUBLIC HEALTH. —Public Health Agency of Canada Également disponible en français sous le titre : Parce que la vie continue … Aider les enfants et les adolescents à vivre la séparation et le divorce. Un guide à l’intention des parents To obtain additional information, please contact: Public Health Agency of Canada Address Locator 0900C2 Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9 Tel.: 613-957-2991 Toll free: 1-866-225-0709 Fax: 613-941-5366 TTY: 1-800-465-7735 E-mail: [email protected] This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Health, 2016 Publication date: March 2016 This publication may be reproduced for personal or internal use only without permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. PRINT Cat.: HP35-68/2016E ISBN: 978-0-660-04541-2 PDF Cat.: HP35-68/2016E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-04540-5 Pub.: 150254 Acknowledgements The Public Health Agency of Canada is very grateful to all individuals who have contributed to the creation of this third edition of Because Life Goes On … Helping Children and Youth Live With Separation and Divorce, in particular to its authors who have committed their passion, expertise and wisdom to this venture for more than 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Parental Responsibility: a Harm Reduction-Based Approach to Divorce Law Reform
    Shared Parental Responsibility: A Harm Reduction-Based Approach to Divorce Law Reform Edward Kruk ABSTRACT. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, our aim is to provide a selective overview and analysis of divorce research in the past five year period (2000-2005), during which important new data on chil- dren, families, and divorce have appeared. Much of this data challenges current socio-legal policy and “practice wisdom,” and includes: (1) the emergent perspective of adult children of divorce reflecting upon their experiences and preferences growing up as children of divorce; (2) stud- ies comparing child and family outcomes in joint and sole custody families; and (3) new data on the distribution of child care tasks and re- sponsibilities in families. These data support an approach to postdivorce parenting based on reducing the harms attendant to divorce for children and parents, parental equality, and family autonomy as most in keeping with children’s needs and the principle of “the best interests of the child, from the perspective of the child,” which, it is argued, provides a more child-fo- cused standard for child custody determination than current approaches. Second, building on this research foundation, we propose a new model of post-divorce parenting: a “shared parental responsibility” framework, in which parental responsibilities precede custodial rights, and children’s Edward Kruk, PhD, is Associate Professor, The University of British Columbia, School of Social Work and Family Studies, 2080 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Canada (E-mail: [email protected]). Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, Vol. 43(3/4) 2005 Available online at http://www.haworthpress.com/web/JDR © 2005 by The Haworth Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Father-Absence, Social Equality and Social Progress
    FATHER-ABSENCE, SOCIAL EQUALITY AND SOCIAL PROGRESS Helen M. Alvaré, George Mason University School of Law Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2011, pp. 123-163 George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series 12-66 FATHER-ABSENCE, SOCIAL EQUALITY, AND SOCIAL PROGRESS Helen M Alvard * INTRODUCTION Neuralgic yet inevitable questions about parenting and gender are ripe for legal reflection today: do children benefit from the stable presence, during their upbringing, of both a mother and a father? Do women benefit? Does society? Today, significant numbers of children are parented largely or exclusively by one adult, quite often the mother, following divorce or out-of-wedlock childbearing.' More rarely, father- absence is a function of a single woman's choice to use assisted reproductive technology.2 Same-sex unions also provide one-sexed parenting, but because such unions also raise questions about the effects of parents' sexual orientation upon children,-a different and complex subject-this subject will not be treated in this paper. Figures from the 2007 Census update showed that 25.8% of approximately seventy-four million United States children under eighteen (or about nineteen million children) were living in lone-parent households.4 Of these, approximately sixteen and one-half million lived with their mothers * Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law. The author would like to thank the participants at the Levy Fellows Workshop, and Professors W. Bradford Wilcox and Margaret Brinig for their helpful comments. Thanks also to the George Mason Law School summer research program for its support, and to research librarian Christine Ciambella and research assistant Sophie Coy.
    [Show full text]