Because Life Goes On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2014 Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Margaret F. Brinig, Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling?, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 1426 (August 14, 2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1116 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig, Notre Dame Law School In their recent paper “Anti-Herding Regulation,” forthcoming in the Harvard Business Review,1 Ian Ayres and Joshua Mitts argue that many well-intentioned public policy regulations potentially harm rather than help situations. That is, because the rules seek to pool—or herd—groups of people, treating them as equal, they miss or mask important differences among the regulated, thus magnifying systematic risk. Anti- herding regulation, on the other hand, can produce socially beneficial information, in their words steering “both private and public actors toward better evidence-based outcomes.” Left to their own, or with various carrot-and-stick incentives, some groups, anyway, would instead fare better if allowed to separate or diverge. Ayres and Mitts buttress their case with examples from engineering (bridges collapsing because soldiers crossed them in cadences matched to the structures’ oscillations), finance (mandating only low percentages down for real estate purchasers), biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and genetic variation itself. -
June 6, 2019 Speaking Notes and Reference Materials Presentation To
June 6, 2019 Speaking Notes and Reference Materials Presentation to the Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Re: Bill C-78 (An Act to Amend the Divorce Act, et al) on behalf of: CAFE Canadian Association for Equality L4SP Lawyers for Shared Parenting ANCQ Action des Nouvelles Conjointes et des Nouveaux Conjoints du Quebec CEPC Canadian Equal Parenting Council LW4SP Leading Women for Shared Parenting R.E.A.L. Real Women of Canada Presented by Brian Ludmer, B.COMM., LLB. Page 1 of 3 Index 1. Myths and Facts about Divorce Act Reform - updated version 2. Text of Brian Ludmer’s remarks to the House of Commons – Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights (November 26, 2018) 3. Joint Brief of these organizations submitted to the House of Commons – Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights – November 2018 (English and French versions) 4. Public Opinion Polls a. Nanos 2017 Equal Parenting Summary Poll b. Nanos 2009 Poll results 5. Text of Proposed Rebuttable Presumption of Equal Parenting as Contained in Bill C-560 (2014) 6. Summary of Applicable Social Science a. Professor William V. Fabricius,Ph.D, Associate Professor of Psychology, Arizona State University Presentation to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, House of Commons – November 26, 2018 b. Survey of Leading Research by Professor William V. Fabricius,Ph.D, Associate Professor of Psychology, Arizona State University dated April 19, 2018 c. Linda Nielsen, “Joint Versus Sole Physical Custody: Children’s Outcomes Independent of Parent-Child Relationships, Income and Conflict in 60 Studies” (2018) Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, DOI: 10.1080/10502556.2018.1454204 Page 2 of 3 d. -
Health Law Journal a Publication of the Health Law Section of the New York State Bar Association
NYSBA SUMMER/FALL 2016 | VOL. 21 | NO. 2 Health Law Journal A publication of the Health Law Section of the New York State Bar Association SPECIAL EDITION: DSRIP PERFORMING PROVIDER SYSTEMS From the NYSBA Book Store The New York State Physician’s HIPAA Privacy Manual, 2d ed. This one-of-a-kind, hands-on tool helps health care providers and their legal counsel navigate the often murky waters of the HIPAA Privacy Act. Containing 37 policies and procedures and the forms necessary to implement those policies and procedures, the Manual provides the day-to-day guidance necessary to allow the physician’s office to respond to routine, everyday inquiries about protected health information, as well as the framework to enable the Privacy Officer and health care provider’s counsel to properly respond to even non-routine issues. The Manual is organized in a way that parallels the various aspects of the HIPAA Privacy Rule and covers areas that include General Policies, Uses and Disclosures of Medical Information Without Patient Authorization, and Operational Issues and Patient Rights. The second edition incorporates changes required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act and the most recent regulations. Changes of particular note include breach notification and new rules that directly require compliance from business associates. AUTHORS William P. Keefer, Esq., Lisa McDougall, Esq. PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES Print: 41196 | 2016 | 292 pages | looseleaf | NYSBA Members $85 | Non-Members $105 E-book: 41196E | 2016 | 292 pages | looseleaf | NYSBA Members $85 | Non-Members $105 Get the Information Edge NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 1.800.582.2452 www.nysba.org/pubs Mention Code: PUB8380N HEALTH LAW JOURNAL Summer/Fall 2016 Vol. -
BACK to the BEST INTERESTS of the CHILD 2Nd Edition
POLICY MONOGRAPH BACK TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD 2nd Edition TOWARDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF JOINT RESIDENCE Yuri Joakimidis BACK TO THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD TOWARDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF JOINT RESIDENCE Although the dispute is symbolized by a 'versus' which signifies two adverse parties at opposite poles of a line, there is in fact a third party whose interests and rights make of the line a triangle. That person, the child who is not an official party to the lawsuit but whose well- being is in the eye of the controversy, has a right to shared parenting when both are equally suited to provide it. Inherent in the express public policy is a recognition of the child's right to equal access and opportunity with both parents, the right to be guided and nurtured by both parents, the right to have major decisions made by the application of both parents' wisdom, judgement and experience. The child does not forfeit these rights when the parents divorce." Presiding Judge Dorothy T. Beasley, Georgia Court of Appeals, "In the Interest of A.R.B., a Child," July 2, 1993 A PAPER COMPILED BY THE JOINT PARENTING ASSOCIATION Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... 5 Overview.................................................................................................................... 7 The Solomon Parable ................................................................................................ 8 The Hearing............................................................................................................ -
Sierra Leone: the Perpetual Struggle for Security
Sierra Leone: the Perpetual Struggle for Security Between 1991 and 2002, the Sierra Leone civil war left approximately 70,000 people dead, hundreds of thousands mutilated and displaced over half of the population of five million.1 This tragedy is a result of various factors that became intertwined. The country’s “historical, cultural, sociological and political milieu” combined with the complexities of natural resources and economic issues all “contributed to and fueled the conflict.”2 The aim of this research is to investigate the severity of events and violent acts along with how society functions today that can provide pertinent information on Sierra Leone’s stability and what threats to security may currently exist or are likely to occur. Analyzing such a historical event and its aftermath provides crucial information on what is lacking in peace efforts and the significant gaps in programs that hinder developing and maintaining stability in countries that have experienced conflict. The atrocities committed during the civil war are infamous to Sierra Leone. A decade of violence that included drug-induced children who “hacked off the limbs of thousands of civilians, including women and babies,”3 has left a psychological imprint on a nation. Sierra Leone’s civil war and its aftermath can be held as a prime example when attempting to predict probable outcomes and possible solutions in similar conflicts. Examining the situation in post-conflict Sierra Leone can assess the effectiveness of its DDR (disarmament, demobilization and reintegration) program and what issues have remained persistent that can be properly addressed in current and future dilemmas, such as the marginalization of girls. -
Expense Audit Trail Report
Coshocton County Expense Audit Trail Report Accounts: 001-0110-510100 to 600-9999-500000 From: 7/1/2019 to 7/31/2019 Include Inactive Accounts: No Journal ID Date Transaction Description Source Doc. Invoice# Debit Amount Credit Amount 001-0110-510100 SALARIES - OFFICIALS PR2019070001-027 07/12/2019 Gross: 2019/07/12 $5,745.03 $0.00 PR2019070002-048 07/26/2019 Gross: 2019/07/26 $5,745.03 $0.00 001-0110-510100 Total: $11,490.06 $0.00 001-0110-510200 SALARIES - EMPLOYEES PR2019070001-002 07/12/2019 Gross: 2019/07/12 $4,454.00 $0.00 PR2019070002-070 07/26/2019 Gross: 2019/07/26 $4,454.00 $0.00 001-0110-510200 Total: $8,908.00 $0.00 001-0110-511000 P.E.R.S. EJ2019070036-007 07/30/2019 Matching for OPERS PENSIO CK2019000139-08 OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Inv_64519 $1,427.85 $0.00 EJ2019070036-071 07/30/2019 Matching for OPERS PENSIO CK2019000139-51 OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Inv_65272 $1,427.85 $0.00 001-0110-511000 Total: $2,855.70 $0.00 001-0110-511500 MEDICARE TAX-EMPLOYER EJ2019070008-151 07/12/2019 Matching for MEDICARE (MED CK2019000130-02 ELECTRONIC TRANSFER Inv_65787 $141.80 $0.00 EJ2019070025-103 07/26/2019 Matching for MEDICARE (MED CK2019000137-45 ELECTRONIC TRANSFER Inv_66550 $141.80 $0.00 001-0110-511500 Total: $283.60 $0.00 001-0110-526000 Contract Services EJ2019070021-575 07/24/2019 Gov Deal Sales from 57648 - 7. CK0000360810-01 PO2019061856 GOVDEALS INC 3790-062019 $9.26 $0.00 001-0110-526000 Total: $9.26 $0.00 001-0110-527000 ADVERTISING EJ2019070003-719 07/10/2019 advertising from 57479 - 7.10.1 CK0000360436-01 -
Lorna Gamberini, What About (084) Robinson, F
ISSN 1368-2105 WINTER http://wwwspeechmagcom Competency in head and neck When is good enough? Long-term care Training with SOAP Collaborating for Communication Clinics and schools Out of the frying pan... How I augment AAC My top resources Music in therapy Evidence And introducing ‘Winning Ways’ based practice: a climbing frame not a cage ONWARDS AND UPWARDS READEROFFERSREADEROFFERSREADEROFFERSREADEROFFERS WINTER 03 speechmag Peter & In need of inspiration? Doing a literature review? The Cat Looking to update your practice? No scary wolf for Peter this time, but still a story to capture the interest of young Or simply wanting to locate an article you school-aged children. Black Sheep Press is read recently? offering copies of this narrative re-tell Our cumulative index facility is there to help. assessment to THREE lucky Speech & Language Therapy in Practice readers - FREE! The speechmag website enables you to: Peter and the Cat can be used with children from 5 to 9 years, pri- marily those with language delay / disorder, but also for more View the contents pages of the last four general screening. The task is not norm-referenced, but gives a issues descriptive profile of the child’s development of key narrative Search the cumulative index for abstracts of competencies which can be linked directly to intervention goals. previous articles by author name and subject For your chance to win, send your name and address to Speech & Language Therapy in Practice - P&C offer, Alan Henson, Black Order a copy of a back article online. Sheep Press, 67 Middleton, Cowling, Keighley, W. Yorks BD22 0DQ Plus by 25th January. -
Arguments for an Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody
The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40:33–55, 2012 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0192-6187 print / 1521-0383 online DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2011.575344 Arguments for an Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody EDWARD KRUK School of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Sixteen arguments in support of an equal parental responsibility presumption in contested child custody are presented from a child- focused perspective, and clinical and empirical evidence in support of each argument is contrasted to the conflicting evidence. These arguments are made in support of the model equal parental re- sponsibility presumption outlined in Volume 39, Number 5, of The American Journal of Family Therapy. We state our case for the equal parental responsibility presumption out- lined in Volume 39, Number 5, of The American Journal of Family Therapy, in “A Model Equal Parental Responsibility Presumption in Contested Child Custody.” Given the drawbacks of the “best interests of the child” (BIOC) standard and the harms attendant to the sole custody model detailed in the earlier article, we consider that each of the sixteen arguments below is sufficient to adopt equal parental responsibility (EPR) as a viable alternative; combined, they are a powerful testament to the urgent need for law reform in the direction of equal parenting. The research studies cited in support of each argument have, for the most part, utilized large and representative samples, and overcome most of the methodological limitations of earlier research. SIXTEEN ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF EQUAL PARENTAL Downloaded by [The University of British Columbia] at 12:03 10 January 2012 RESPONSIBILITY 1. -
Social Science and Parenting Plans for Young Children: a Consensus Report
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law © 2014 American Psychological Association 2014, Vol. 20, No. 1, 46–67 1076-8971/14/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/law0000005 Social Science and Parenting Plans for Young Children: A Consensus Report Richard A. Warshak University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, with the endorsement of the researchers and practitioners listed in the Appendix Two central issues addressed in this article are the extent to which young children’s time should be spent predominantly in the care of the same parent or divided more evenly between both parents, and whether children under the age of 4 should sleep in the same home every night or spend overnights in both parents’ homes. A broad consensus of accomplished researchers and practitioners agree that, in normal circumstances, the evidence supports shared residential arrangements for children under 4 years of age whose parents live apart from each other. Because of the well-documented vulnerability of father–child relationships among never-married and divorced parents, the studies that identify overnights as a protective factor associated with increased father commitment to child rearing and reduced incidence of father drop-out, and the absence of studies that demonstrate any net risk of overnights, policymakers and decision makers should recognize that depriving young children of overnights with their fathers could compromise the quality of developing father-child relationships. Sufficient evidence does not exist to support postponing the introduction of regular and frequent involvement, including overnights, of both parents with their babies and toddlers. The theoretical and practical considerations favoring overnights for most young children are more compelling than concerns that overnights might jeopardize children’s development. -
Restorative Practice Resource Project
WELCOME RESTORATIVE PRACTICE RESOURCE PROJECT TOOLS AND SUCCESSFUL PRACTICES FOR RESTORATIVE SCHOOLS SUPPORTING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND WELL BEING RESTORATIVE PRACTICE CONSORTIUM • ONTARIO CANADA 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WELCOME Prepared by: The Restorative Practice Consortium No group or organization can grow, contribute to their wider We hope you find our work useful in moving your individual, school or board contexts, and create without the supports that enable their work. Restorative Practice implementation forward in some way. It is with gratitude that we would like to acknowledge many of these, although a complete listing would be impossible. The materials contained in this resource are, to the best of our knowledge, free The Restorative Practice Consortium would first like to acknowledge and thank the Ministry of of copyright unless otherwise indicated. The materials are meant to be integrated Education of Ontario, Safe Schools Branch, for their ongoing support over the course of years in into your content and goals. If we have missed something in this regard, please terms of guidance and funding. let us know. A sincere thank you to all those who attended the 2013 Restorative Practices Symposium and whose We wish you well on your restorative journey. In these interesting times in which voices informed the foundation of this work. we live, the restorative work is more important than ever. A special thank you to the school boards and organizations who supported the work of this project though generous release opportunities to And, finally, please feel free to share this work with anyone else you feel might be further the reach of Restorative Practices in this able to benefit from it. -
Forty Years of Family Law: a Retrospective
611 FORTY YEARS OF FAMILY LAW: A RETROSPECTIVE Patrick Parkinson* This article presents a thematic retrospective of the past 40 years of family law in terms of the international landscape in developed countries. It examines three questions: First, whatever happened to marriage? While once marriage was central to family formation, it is no longer. Indeed, heterosexual couples have never been less interested in the idea of marriage. Secondly, whatever happened to divorce? The nature of divorce has fundamentally changed in the last forty years, largely as a consequence of the recognition that while intimate domestic partnerships may come to an end, parenthood is, for the most part, indissoluble. The ties that bind parents together remain important long after the adult relationship has ended. Thirdly, whatever happened to parenthood? Legal parenthood has become vastly more complicated than in the mid-1970s. One reason for this is the revolution in artificial reproduction techniques. A second reason is that lesbian and gay couples have, in increasing numbers, sought to raise children and demanded recognition of parental rights which are not based on genetic parenthood. These changes have had a profound impact upon modern family law. I INTRODUCTION Over a 40-year career (so far), Bill Atkin has made a substantial contribution to family law in New Zealand. His work in this field covers a large number of topics and, like most academic family lawyers, his interests have changed over time. What is consistent about Bill's work is its quality. With every issue he tackles, he brings careful scholarship and wise insights. His contributions to family law also extend far beyond New Zealand. -
8, 2014 at 10:00 A.M
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING April 4, 2014 Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Commissioners Court of Harris County, Texas, will be held on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Commissioners Court of Harris County, Texas, on the ninth floor of the Harris County Administration Building, 1001 Preston Avenue, Houston, Texas, for the purpose of considering and taking action on matters brought before the Court. Agendas may be obtained in advance of the court meeting in the Office of Coordination & Budget, Suite 938, Administration Building, 1001 Preston Avenue, Houston, Texas, in the Commissioners Court Courtroom on the day of the meeting, or via the internet at www.harriscountytx.gov/agenda. Stan Stanart, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of Commissioners Court of Harris County, Texas Olga Z. Mauzy, Director Commissioners Court Records HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS COMMISSIONERS COURT 1001 Preston, Suite 938 Houston, Texas 77002-1817 (713) 755-5113 Ed Emmett El Franco Lee Jack Morman Steve Radack R. Jack Cagle County Judge Commissioner, Precinct 1 Commissioner, Precinct 2 Commissioner, Precinct 3 Commissioner, Precinct 4 No. 14.07 AGENDA April 8, 2014 10:00 a.m. Opening prayer by Reverend David Tan Mai of Kirkwood Church in Houston. I. Departments 17. County Courts 1. Public Infrastructure Department 18. Travel & Training a. Right of Way a. Out of Texas b. Construction Programs b. In Texas c. Toll Road Authority 19. Grants d. Flood Control District 20. Fiscal Services & Purchasing e. Architecture & Engineering a. Auditor 2. Budget Management b. Treasurer 3. Information Technology c.