Kakumiro District
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local Government Performance Assessment Kakumiro District (Vote Code: 614) Assessment Scores Crosscutting Minimum Conditions 40% Education Minimum Conditions 30% Health Minimum Conditions 60% Water & Environment Minimum Conditions 75% Micro-scale Irrigation Minimum Conditions 0% Crosscutting Performance Measures 64% Educational Performance Measures 78% Health Performance Measures 73% Water & Environment Performance Measures 68% Micro-scale Irrigation Performance Measures 0% 614 Crosscutting Performance Kakumiro Measures 2020 District Summary of Definition of No. Compliance justification Score requirements compliance Local Government Service Delivery Results 1 4 Service Delivery • Evidence that There was physical evidence that infrastructure projects Outcomes of DDEG infrastructure implemented using DDEG funding were functional and investments projects Utilized. The Ten Projects were panned completion of implemented using Mulinga primary school appeared on page 66 of the work Maximum 4 points on DDEG funding are plan and page 62 of Annual Performance. Rehabilitation of this performance functional and Mukoora HCIII appeared on page 59 of the work plan and measure utilized as per the page 59 of Annual Performance. Establishment of nursery purpose of the tree bed appeared on page 99 of the work plan and page 79 project(s): of Annual Performance. • If so: Score 4 or Procurement of a laptop appeared on page 52 of the work else 0 plan and page 96 of Annual Performance. Establishment of the physical plan for Kikwaya trading center appeared on page 55 of the work plan and page 84 of Annual Performance. Procurement of filling cabinet appeared on page 62 of the work plan and page 96 of Annual Performance. Procurement of goats (Boer) appeared on page 19 of the work plan and page 54 of Annual Performance. Monitoring and distribution appeared on page 55 of the work plan and page 59 of Annual Performance. Building plan for the District Administration block appeared on page 55 of the work plan and page 35 of Annual Performance. Capacity building CBG appeared on page 06 of the work plan and page 56 of Annual Performance. There was a physical evidence of Molinga P/S and Mukoola HC III were functional and utilized 2 Not Applicable 0 Service Delivery a. If the average Performance score in the overall LLG performance Maximum 6 points on assessment this performance increased from measure previous assessment : o by more than 10%: Score 3 o 5-10% increase: Score 2 o Below 5 % Score 0 2 3 Service Delivery b. Evidence that the There was documentary evidence that investment Performance DDEG funded projects that were implemented in the previous FY investment projects 2019/2020 were Completed as per performance Maximum 6 points on implemented in the this performance previous FY were Contract (with AWP by the end of the FY 2019/2020. measure completed as per The following were DDEG Funded investment Projects performance contract (with AWP) Molinga P/S was completed and it appeared on page 62 of by end of the FY. annual performance contract and Mukoola HC III was on completed and it appeared on page 59 of the annual • If 100% the performance contract. projects were completed : Score 3 • If 80-99%: Score 2 • If below 80%: 0 3 Information wasnt availed at the time of Assessment 0 Investment a. If the LG Performance budgeted and spent all the DDEG for the Maximum 4 points on previous FY on this performance eligible measure projects/activities as per the DDEG grant, budget, and implementation guidelines: Score 2 or else score 0. 3 2 Investment b. If the variations in Project: Performance the contract price for sample of DDEG Renovation of Mukoora HC Maximum 4 points on funded infrastructure KAKU614/WRKS/2019-20/00015 this performance investments for the measure previous FY are Engineer’s estimates: 106,513,240 within +/-20% of the LG Engineers Contract sum: 107,082,350 estimates, Variance: 0.5 score 2 or else score 0 Performance Reporting and Performance Improvement 4 0 Accuracy of reported a. Evidence that 3 LLGs were sampled as below, information information on the positions filled in Bwanswa Sub County had 7 staff at the sub county and the Maximum 4 points on LLGs as per staff list at the district. this Performance minimum staffing Kasambya Sub County had 8 staff at the Sub County and Measure standards is and 9 in the staff list at the district. accurate, Kakumiro Town Council had 14 Staff in both lists at the score 2 or else district and Town Council Office. score 0 The information on the position filled at the sub county was not accurate. 4 2 Accuracy of reported b. Evidence that There was documentary evidence that DDEG Funded information infrastructure investments were in place as per reports produced by the constructed using LG Maximum 4 points on the DDEG is in this Performance place as per reports Measure produced by the LG: The following were DDEG Funded investment Projects • If 100 % in place: • Rehabilitation of Mukoola Health centre III Score 2, else score 0. • Establishment of nursery tree bed Note: if there are • Planned completion of mulinga primary school no reports produced to The Rehabilitation of Mukoola Health centre III was reported review: Score 0 in the Annual Budget with Shs 47,0802,000 page 25 of the Annual Budget ,appeared in the Annual Work plan FY 2019/20 Page 59 and reported on in the Annual Performance Report FY 2019/20 on Page 59 Establishment of nursery tree bed The procured Dissecting Table was reported on in Annual Budget with Shs 10,000,000 on page 55 of the Annual Budget FY 2019/20, In the Annual Work Plan the was reported on Page 99 of the Annual Work Plan. In the Annual Performance Report, on page 79 of the Annual Performance Report FY 2019/20 Planned completion of mulinga primary school reported on in the Annual Budget FY2019/20 with a budget of Shs 60,000,000 page 62 of the Budget FY2019/20 and reflected on 66 of the Annual work plan and page 62 of the Annual Performance Report FY 2019/20 5 Not Applicable 0 Reporting and a. Evidence that the Performance LG conducted a Improvement credible assessment of LLGs Maximum 8 points on as verified during this Performance the National Local Measure Government Performance Assessment Exercise; If there is no difference in the assessment results of the LG and national assessment in all LLGs score 4 or else 0 5 Not Applicable 0 Reporting and b. The District/ Performance Municipality has Improvement developed performance Maximum 8 points on improvement plans this Performance for at least 30% of Measure the lowest performing LLGs for the current FY, based on the previous assessment results. Score: 2 or else score 0 5 Not Applicable 0 Reporting and c. The District/ Performance Municipality has Improvement implemented the PIP for the 30 % Maximum 8 points on lowest performing this Performance LLGs in the Measure previous FY: Score 2 or else score 0 Human Resource Management and Development 6 0 Budgeting for and a. Evidence that the The recruitment plan for 2021/2022 dated 20th/October/2020 actual recruitment and LG has was sent and received by the Ministry of Public Service on deployment of staff consolidated and the 27th/October/2020 submitted the Maximum 2 points on staffing This was after the deadline of 30th October. this Performance requirements for the Measure coming FY to the MoPS by September 30th, with copy to the respective MDAs and MoFPED. Score 2 or else score 0 7 2 Performance a. Evidence that the The attendance had been tracked and analyzed in the last management District/Municipality FY as per the guidelines. has conducted a Maximum 5 points on tracking and The working days for December were 22 and many people this Performance analysis of staff worked above average, the attendance for November was so Measure attendance (as poor with majority below average out of the 21 working days, guided by Ministry July- October had commendable attendance of people of Public Service attending all working days. CSI): Generally the attendance in the last FY was commendable. Score 2 or else score 0 7 0 Performance i. Evidence that the The HODs were appraised in the previous FY as below: management LG has conducted an appraisal with - Bigabwa Glagys the CFO was appraised on the Maximum 5 points on the following 16th/July/2020. this Performance features: Measure - Magambo Willy the acting District Planner was appraised HODs have been on the 3rd/July/2020. appraised as per - Mukabya Robert the acting District Engineer was guidelines issued appraised on the 14th/July/2020. by MoPS during the previous - Baguma the acting District Natural Resources was appraised on the 16th/July/2020. FY: Score 1 or else 0 - Serumaga Stephen the acting District Production Officer was apparaised on the 3rd/July/2020. - Kysea Benard the acting DCDO was appraised on the 16th/July/2020. - Mutakooha George the acting District Commercial Officer was appraised on the 30th/July/2019. - Bakeleke William the acting DEO was appraised on the 24th/July/2020. - Senteza Robert the acting DHO was not appraised . - Isingoma Julius the Civil Engineer water was not appraised. Appraisals of the HODs were done but not done on time within the FY. 7 1 Performance ii. (in addition to “a” The Rewards and Sanctions Committee sat on the management above) has also 8th/August/2019. implemented Maximum 5 points on administrative MbabaziAssumptaAg.ADHO-MCH this Performance rewards and Sanyu Christopher-Chairperson Measure sanctions on time as provided for in the Baleke William-Member-DEO guidelines: Senteza Robert-Member-DHO Score 1 or else 0 Kyesa BenardAg.DCDO Munoli Richard- Secretary Rewards & Sanctions Cases Handled; - Musoke Andrew a headteacher was sanctioned before the committee for financial Mismanagement, No School Management Committee, Chronic absenteeism, Not Sober at all, and he defended himself saying that the role of headteacher is too high and demanding, accounted for the money.