25 Market Place Recorder: Ruth Gibson Date of Visits: 13.9.10, 27.1.11 5.12.14 (By E.H.& Dendro Work)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

25 Market Place Recorder: Ruth Gibson Date of Visits: 13.9.10, 27.1.11 5.12.14 (By E.H.& Dendro Work) VERNACULAR BUILDINGS RESEARCH HENLEY ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL GROUP Parish/County: Henley-on-Thames, Oxon Owner: Municipal Charities Leased by: Facy’s until 2011 Street and House name: 25 Market Place Recorder: Ruth Gibson Date of visits: 13.9.10, 27.1.11 5.12.14 (by E.H.& Dendro work) Listing grade and entry text: Gd II, ‘ for group value. C18th facade. Red brick with shallow pitched, slate roof. 3 storeys, 3 windows of which centre is blank. Cased frame, sashes with slightly cambered heads and glazing bars. Ground floor altered C19th shop front’ The above Listing entry is clearly wrong on many counts. English Heritage is in the process of updating this as the building’s early timber framed structure has been discovered and dated. NB On 10.12.2014 two bays of the rear range roof timbers have produced a dendro date of 1471. The entire Listing Entry has been changed accordingly by Historic England on 2.4.2015. No27 No 25 No 25 Market Place, shop front facing north, Rear ranges: single storey brick and flint brick shallow pitch and slate roof. The 1st floor central former stables or workshops. window and two top floor The tall, white gable is the 5-bay, C15th range ones are false windows. Rear roof of street range is steep and tiled. Known History: Owned by William Barnaby and left in his will to the town in 1585 for the upkeep of the bridge and the poor of the town. Documented as part of the town’s charities in 1835 (A.Cottingham p.194/198, ‘The Hostelries of Henley’ identified it as The Rose & Crown at No 27 Market Place, but the correct house number is No. 25). The ownership of No. 25 is still with the Municipal Charities, who continue to use the income from it for charitable purposes as intended by the wealthy Elizabethan donor. According to Cottingham its use as a P.H. is only documented between 1751 and c.1788; its name however, suggests that its use as an inn or public house may date from Tudor times. Its brick front, sash windows and shallow slate roof indicate alterations or rebuilding early in the C19th . This would fit an advertisement by the Town Clerk for the sale of a 33 year repairing lease in 1835, which suggests the construction of a shop front, part removal of the passageway, the digging of a cellar and the building of 2 attics. Errol Facy’s grandfather leased the building from the Municipal Charities in 1896 for £ 50 p.a. The lease of the shop ceased in 2011,that of the flat above ceased a year earlier. The ground floor shop was in use as a ladies’ fashion outlet; the first floor and attic were used as accommodation by the Facy family until recently. 1 Date of 1st map, type of plot: The 1878 1st O.S. map shows a building abutting the south side of Market Place, with carriage way on the east side. The plot runs back to the parish boundary between Henley and Rotherfield Greys and could well have been of the length of 429 feet advertised in the Particulars of 1835 (see above, A.Cottingham). Plan form/position in street: The front range consists of two bays, built parallel to the street of single pile depth with a long rear range attached at right angles. This two storey-range, consisting of 5 timber framed bays, adjoins the westernmost front bay and accommodates a first floor staircase in Bay V (see schematic plan below). These stairs and landing connect and serve both rear and front ranges, although they are of different floor levels indicating different building dates. Beyond the timber framed two storey section to the south is a single storey building, brick with some timber framing, which is part of the shop and also storage area. All other out-buildings, glass house and substantial gardens, shown on the OS map have made room for the car park. Description of the building: The principal street range is occupied by the shop front at g.f. level, which is a through shop extending into the rear wing from which all early features have been removed. The red brickwork of the wall is laid in Flemish bond with flat brick arches over the windows. There are 3 sash windows (two 8 x 8 window panes, one 4 x 4 ) at the first floor and 3 at the attic floor (4 x 4). However, the central first floor and two attic windows are false. They would have been put in simply to give the front elevation the all important symmetry of a typical Georgian façade. The front roof was raised to allow for head height in the attic. It is covered with Welsh slates. However, at the back the roof retains its original steep pitch and is clay tiled. At first floor level the false central window also shows that it was put into an earlier building, as it abuts an existing, timber framed cross wall, the latter still indicated by the uneven plaster work of the bedroom walls. The ceiling in bedroom east is c. 3 feet higher than that in b.r. west. The attic: This is reached via a landing and turned staircase inserted into part of Bay V of the rear wing, which connects the different levels of the front and rear ranges. Mr. Errol Facy recalls this staircase rising originally directly from the shop floor. West, front attic room with small cast iron bedroom fireplace, a typical Victorian, mass produced example with register plate and decorative garlands incorporated in the front face. Only the west bay of the attic has been converted into a useable bedroom; it has the only real window of the three attic ones shown externally, as well as a fireplace. The east bay is blocked off by the central truss of the original roof structure and is now only accessible through a small hatch in the wattle, daub & plaster wall. This now blocks this formerly open, arch braced truss. Most of the elements of the original roof structure of the east bay survive below the later roof timbers inserted above it, to allow for the increased height of the front brick wall. 2 New rafters new roof support Blocked window queen strut Raised front brick wall with blocked window The old roof structure retains its original trusses and all supporting the new rafters for the shallower rafters at the south/rear; those on the north/front have slate roof. Underneath are the old roof been removed, but the original purlin is still in place, timbers with one surviving wind brace supporting new timbers for the new roof above. between purlin and principal rafter The original truss (centre back) seems mostly intact with two raking queen struts between tie and collar. Central truss. Just visible is the north arch brace, which rises from the northern principal rafter to the cambered collar. There is another arch brace on the south side, but barely visible in this photograph. The front purlin is clasped (?) and its dimensions are 7” x 5”. The collar dimensions are 7” x 4”, the arch brace is 6”x 2”. Chamfers ? This was very probably an open truss, but it is not possible to see whether it has a tie beam, as the floor level of this attic space has been raised by circa three feet and the original fabric in the dividing wall below is not visible, but uneven enough to indicate timber framing. 3 Rear wing: At ground floor shop level no early features are visible; the rear wall of the front range has been removed, creating an open through shop. At first floor level four timber framed bays of between 2 m and 2,70 m length survive. The fifth bay (V on plan) houses the C19th staircase and landing and little of the original framing remains. In the 1st floor bays some of the wall posts with their jowl heads are visible supporting tie beams. Curved wind braces are visible in Bays I and II, which have high ceilings inserted at collar/wall plate levels. The dividing cross wall at Truss D, between Bays III and IV, consists of later studs replacing an earlier timber stud wall, the tenons of which can still be seen in the soffit of the tie beam. Left: Bay I, south west corner with curved wind brace. Right: Stud wall of truss D. A long raking strut is typical of C18th work, further indicating a later alteration to this dividing wall. The attic is divided into 5 timber-framed bays of irregular lengths. It has a side purlin roof with tusk tenons jointed into the principal rafters and supported by struts, collars or braces. Each of the visible trusses is of a different design, as shown below. The timbers in trusses C, D & E have been dendro dated to 1471. North side of closed Truss C Truss D with western queen post clasping Ceilings of bays 2 & 1 beyond are the purlin; also note groove in the back of this raised to collar level. There are raking post, indicating a previously closed truss wi nd braces throughout the roof. with wattles & daub infill . 4 Truss E, south side, looking north into the later inserted stair well and landing of Bay V. Truss E has two long, slightly curved braces, lap jointed to form a scissor brace, which would have created an elegant open hall roof, possibly together with the missing end truss at F.
Recommended publications
  • Web Truss Assembly Manual
    protect what matters WEB TRUSS ASSEMBLY MANUAL Copyright Fall River Holdings, LLC. Phone #1-800-825-0316 http://www.worldwidesteelbuildings.com/ Building Erection Manual (Rev-4) 1.21.15 1 Table of Contents IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ ...........................................................................................................................4 STORAGE, HANDLING AND UNLOADING INFORMATION..................................................................................5 UNLOADING ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 HANDLING ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 STORAGE ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 PARTS DESCRIPTION LIST ................................................................................................................................6 TOOL LIST ......................................................................................................................................................7 STARTING YOUR BUILDING .............................................................................................................................7 GENERAL NOTES .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Metal Building Systems Manual
    2006 Metal Building Systems Manual 50th Anniversary Edition METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 1300 Sumner Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Copyright © 2006 Metal Building Manufacturers Association, Inc. All rights reserved PREFACE The MBMA Metal Building Systems Manual incorporates the results of research undertaken by MBMA, its member companies and other industry groups. In many respects, it reflects refinement and advances in the knowledge of load application methods and design. This edition of the Metal Building Systems Manual replaces the 2002 edition, and its release coincides with the 50th anniversary of the Metal Building Manufacturers Association. Most municipalities in the United States have now adopted a building code. In the past, where a building code did not govern the design, the recommended loads in the MBMA Low-Rise Building Systems Manual (the predecessor to the Metal Building Systems Manual) were often specified. In recognition of the decreased need for MBMA loads, the Metal Building Systems Manual now focuses on how to apply the loads specified by the International Building Code and ASCE 7. Although the information in the new manual can be applied to low-rise buildings in general, it concentrates on issues related to design, code compliance and specification of metal building systems. Use of this manual is totally voluntary. Each building manufacturer or designer retains the prerogative to choose its own design and commercial practices and the responsibility to design its building systems to comply with applicable specifications and safety considerations. Although every effort has been made to present accurate and sound engineering and design information, MBMA assumes no responsibility whatsoever for the application of this information to the design or construction of any specific building system.
    [Show full text]
  • Helpful Hints for Constructing
    HHelpfulelpful HintsHints FForor CConstructingonstructing CCommercialommercial ResidResideentialntial AgriculturalAgricultural Post Frame • UL Class “A” fire rated • Highest impact resistance (Class 4) • “Cool” colors save energy • Qualifies for homeowners’ Insurance discounts Not available in Copper Colored or Multi-Tone. COPPER COLOR BARKDUST BAY HARBOR BLUE GOLD RUSH NORTHWEST SLATE TWILIGHT BLACK WOODLAND TIMBER Table of Contents Before Getting Started Page Talk to Local Building Inspector . .4 Items Recommended . .4 Traditional Post Frame Construction String Line Building Dimensions . .5 Square the Building . .5 Setting Corner Posts . .6 Post Location . .7 Grade Board . .9 Girts . .10 Headers . .11 Truss Location . .12 Raising Trusses . .13 Purlins . .14 Bracing . .14-15 Bookshelf Post Frame Construction . .24-27 Options Sliding Door Framing . .16-17 Sliding Door Accessories and Trim . .18-19 Tab Lock Sliding Doors . .20-21 Kwik Frame Sliding Doors . .22 Overhead Door Framing . .23 Overhangs and Trim . .28-29 Windows and Service Doors . .30-32 Storing, handling, and cutting panels . .33 Panel Installation . .34-36 Wainscot and Eavelite . .37 Skylite . .38 Interior Liner Panel . .39 Insulation . .40 Ventilation . .41 Cupola Installation . .42-43 Horse Stalls . .44-45 Gutter Installation . .46-47 Accessories & Trim . .48-50 PAGE 3 Before Getting Started This Helpful Hints Guide has been developed to help you construct your post frame building and makes no representation or guarantee that you will be able to successfully complete your building. It is important that questions be asked before you get too far into construction. Study this manual carefully before starting construction. You can use it as a guide and refer to it during construction. Have you talked to your local building inspector? We suggest you check with your local building official regarding site location, permit procedures, safety regulations and specifica - tions of the materials used to construct your new building.
    [Show full text]
  • Llanerch Cynwyd, Denbighshire, LL21 ONB Formerly Merionethshire NPR N 421847 HWAR 17/02 Architectural Record 2017 for D Iscovering Old Welsh Houses Group
    Llanerch Cynwyd, Denbighshire, LL21 ONB Formerly Merionethshire NPR N 421847 HWAR 17/02 Architectural Record 2017 For D iscovering Old Welsh Houses Group Final Report February, 2017 A report commissioned by The Discovering Old Welsh Houses Group in partnership with The Royal Commission o n the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Wales Peter Thompson MA, PG Dip H ist Env Cons. Llwyndu Farmhouse, Llanaber, Barmouth, Gwynedd, LL42 1RR [email protected] HW AR 2017/02 Llanerc h, Cynwyd, Denbighshire, LL21 ONB Architectural Record Llanerch Cynwyd, Denbighshire LL21 ONB . formerly Merioneth shire Architectural Record Project Details Job No. HW AR 2017/02 NMRW Ref NPRN 421847 Building stat us Unlisted Community Cynwyd Reference NGR SJ 0439438642 Job Description. Architectural Record Draft HW-ARD 17 /02-Final Author Peter Thompson Date February 2017 Client Discovering Old Welsh Houses Project Document Location D:/HW/2016 Llanerch /draft ARD 17/02 /Llanerch Llwyndu Farmhouse, Llanaber, Barmouth, Gwynedd, LL42 1RR [email protected] Tel: 01341280144 m: 07912 748367 A report commissioned by The Discovering Old Welsh Houses Group in partnership with The Royal Commission o n the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Wales 1 HW AR 2017/02 Llanerc h, Cynwyd, Denbighshire, LL21 ONB Architectural Record TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ..……..…4 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2 AIMS & OBJECTIVES ……………………… ……………………………………………………….…………………………………. 7 3 METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Carpentry & Roofing
    Presenting Catalog excerpts specifically selected for CARPENTRY & ROOFING You will find products for… ✓ Roof, Wall, Façade ✓ Window Construction ✓ Misc. Tools ✓ DIN- and Standard Parts ✓ Welding, Soldering ✓ Chemical Products International Business Services Ltd. PO Box 2462, Garibaldi Highlands, BC V0N 1T0, Canada Phone +1 604 898-9500 Toll Free 1-877-439-7423 FAX +1 604 909-5205 [email protected] www.iconridge.com Roof, Wall, Facade Facade Sheeting UV-Direkt 270 • Highly tear-resistant polyester matting with special waterproof UV- resistant coating • Wind-tight facade sheeting suitable for timber frame and metal structures as well as solid constructions • Suitable for „open“ facades with up to 50 mm wide joints and also a maximum proportion of joints on the surface of 40 % • Permanently UV resistant • Two adhesive strips integrated on the upper and lower sides for optimum wind/waterproofing • Adhesive tape width: top: 8.0 cm, bottom: 4.5 cm Technical Data Dimensions (W x L): 1.5 × 50 m Basis weight: 270 g Sd value: 0.02 m Fire behaviour: Class E Impermeability: W1 Tensile strength (longitudinal/transverse): 320/200 [N/50 mm] Usable temperature range: -40° to +100 °C Article No. Article Description QTY Facade Sheeting 8847 1 75 M2<75>FACADE SHE.UV-DIREKT 270 75 UV-Direkt Facade Sheeting UV-Direkt 210 • Highly tear-resistant polyester matting with special waterproof UV- resistant coating • Wind-tight facade sheeting suitable for timber frame and metal structures as well as solid constructions • Permanently UV resistant • Two adhesive strips integrated on the upper and lower sides for optimum wind/waterproofing • Adhesive tape width: Top: 8.0 cm, Bottom: 4.5 cm • Suitable for „open“ facades with up to 30 mm wide joints and also a maximum proportion of joints on the surface of 30 % Technical Data Dimensions (W x L): 1.5 × 50 m Basis weight: 210 g Sd value: 0.04 m Fire behaviour: Class E Impermeability: W1 Tensile strength (longitudinal/transverse): 300/200 [N/50 mm] Usable temperature range: -40° to +100 °C Article No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hammer-Beam Roof: Tradition, Innovation and the Carpenter’S Art in Late Medieval England
    The Hammer-Beam Roof: Tradition, Innovation and the Carpenter’s Art in Late Medieval England Robert Beech A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Art History, Film and Visual Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2014 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is about late medieval carpenters, their techniques and their art, and about the structure that became the fusion of their technical virtuosity and artistic creativity: the hammer-beam roof. The structural nature and origin of the hammer-beam roof is discussed, and it is argued that, although invented in the late thirteenth century, during the fourteenth century the hammer-beam roof became a developmental dead-end. In the early fifteenth century the hammer-beam roof suddenly blossomed into hundreds of structures of great technical proficiency and aesthetic acumen. The thesis assesses the role of the hammer-beam roof of Westminster Hall as the catalyst to such renewed enthusiasm. This structure is analysed and discussed in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • TFG Glossary of Terms 2015
    Copyright © 2015 Timber Framers Guild TFG Glossary of Terms 2015 KEY TO CROSS-REFERENCE TERMS See also See a related, similar thing Cf. Compare a related, dissimilar thing Also Another name for the same thing (q.v.) Which see ABUTMENT. In joinery, the end of one timber touch- BASKET HITCH. Open sling configuration for lifting ing another. See also BUTT JOINT. timber. Cf. CHOKER HITCH. ADZE. Handled edge tool (various patterns) with its BAY. Crosswise volume (perpendicular to roof ridge) in a edge at a right angle to the handle, used to shape or dress building, bounded by two bents or crossframes. Cf. AISLE. timbers. BEAM. Any substantial horizontal framing member. AISLE. Lengthwise volume (parallel to the roof ridge) in BEARING. Area of contact in a joint through which a building divided into several such spaces, usually three. load is transferred. Cf. BAY. BED TIMBER. Short, stout timber used to distribute ANCHOR BEAM. In a Dutch barn, the major tie beam concentrated loads at bridge piers and abutments. joined to H-bent posts, generally by outside-wedged BEETLE. Large wooden mallet typically weighing 15 to through tenons. 30 lbs. Also COMMANDER, PERSUADER. ANGLE TIE. Horizontal corner brace at plate level, often BENDING. Deviation from straight resulting from the combined with a dragon beam (q.v.) under hip roofs. application of force. In a bent member, the concave sur- ANISOTROPIC. Material whose structural properties face is compressed, the convex surface is tensioned and the are not identical in every direction. neutral axis is unaffected. ARCH BRACE 1. Curved brace. 2. Brace rising from BENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesquite Fire Station #4
    A D D E N D U M N O. 1 February 14, 2019 Mesquite Fire Station #4 Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. 3535 Travis Street, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 528-8704 ARCHITECT: BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS, INC. 3535 Travis Street, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75204 214.528.8704 CIVIL ENGINEER: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CLICK ENGINEERING CLICK ENGINEERING 325 N. St Paul, Suite 2850 325 N. St Paul, Suite 2850 Dallas, Texas 75201 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.871.2302 214.871.2302 MEP ENGINEERS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: MEP CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVID MCCASKILL DESIGN GROUP 2928 Story Road West 1804 Wagon Wheel Trail Irving, Texas 75038 Pantego, Texas 76013 972.870.9060 817.291.7979 INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO BIDDERS Distributed along with this addendum are documents prepared by the Construction Manager: 00200 Invitation to Propose, 00400 Instructions to Proposers, 00400A Bid Form, 00400B Subcontractor Qualification Statement, 00900 CM Special Conditions, 00900A Contractor and Subcontractor agreement, 00900B Contractor and Design-Build Subcontractor agreement, 00900C Purchase Order Fabricated Material, and 00900D Preliminary Schedule. The 100% Construction Documents, for the above referenced project, dated January 9, 2019, shall be amended as follows: SPECIFICATIONS Item No. 1.1 PROJECT MANUAL – TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Revise title of Section 08 33 23 (narrative only.) Page 1 of 3 A D D E N D U M N O. 1 February 14, 2019 Mesquite Fire Station #4 Item No. 1.2 SPECIFICATION 08 11 13 – HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES A. Replace Section with attached 08 11 13. B. Add reference to ICC 500 standard. C. Add storm-rated hollow metal doors and frames.
    [Show full text]
  • A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal- Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1991 A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal- Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932 Lori Wynne Plavin University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Plavin, Lori Wynne, "A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal-Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932" (1991). Theses (Historic Preservation). 334. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/334 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Plavin, Lori Wynne (1991). A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal-Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/334 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal-Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932 Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Plavin, Lori Wynne (1991). A Consideration of the Development and Conservation of Metal-Skeleton Buildings: 1884-1932. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/334 UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYL\^^NL\ UBKARIE5 A CONSroERATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION OF METAL-SKELETON BUILDINGS: 1884-1932 Lori Wynne Plavin A THESIS The Graduate Program in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 1991 7 > C3I3t>r-<--^->«— Samuel Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Palikur Traditional Roundwood Construction in Eastern French
    Ogeron et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0226-7 RESEARCH Open Access Palikur traditional roundwood construction in eastern French Guiana: ethnobotanical and cultural perspectives Clémence Ogeron1,2, Guillaume Odonne1* , Antonia Cristinoi3, Julien Engel4,5, Pierre Grenand1, Jacques Beauchêne6, Bruno Clair2 and Damien Davy1 Abstract Background: Palikur Amerindians live in the eastern part of French Guiana which is undergoing deep-seated changes due to the geographical and economic opening of the region. So far, Palikur’s traditional ecological knowledge is poorly documented, apart from medicinal plants. The aim of this study was to document ethnobotanical practices related to traditional construction in the region. Methods: A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Thirty-nine Palikur men were interviewed in three localities (Saint-Georges de l’Oyapock, Regina and Trois-Palétuviers) between December 2013 and July 2014. Twenty-four inventories of wood species used in traditional buildings were conducted in the villages, as well as ethnobotanical walks in the neighboring forests, to complete data about usable species and to determine Linnaean names. Results: After an ethnographic description of roundwood Palikur habitat, the in situ wood selection process of Palikur is precisely described. A total of 960 roundwood pieces were inventoried in situ according to Palikur taxonomy, of which 860 were beams and rafters, and 100 posts in 20 permanent and 4 temporary buildings. Twenty-seven folk species were identified. Sixty-three folk species used in construction were recorded during ethnobotanical walks. They correspond to 263 botanical species belonging to 25 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Gothic Art: a Morphological and Semantic Comparison of Polish and English Architectural Terms
    FOLIA 191 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Anglica V (2015) ISSN 2299-2111 Jacek Rachfał Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Wschodnioeuropejska w Przemyślu, Poland GOTHIC ART: A MORPHOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC COMPARISON OF POLISH AND ENGLISH ARCHITECTURAL TERMS Terminology The description to follow will be of a Gothic church, which, to many people, is a prototypical and spectacular embodiment of a church building. However, the main traits of its skeleton should be sought in Carolingian and Romanesque temples, where the typical model is a nave-and-chancel church Here, the main internal space for the congregation is the longitudinally located nave altar (‘kościół z nawą i chórem’). of worship, and beyond the transepts. A transept a transverse(‘nawa główna’), space to eitherextending side upof theto the crossing (‘ołtarz’), which is the focal point area where the nave, the transepts and the chancel (‘transept, intersect. nawa The poprzeczna’) chancel is (‘skrzyżowanie naw’), that is, an and often a choir and an apse. East of the choir is the presbytery (‘chór, wherechór kapłański’) the high altar is the is space situated. to the The east easternmost of the crossing, section which is the contains apse an altar, that is, a semicircular or polygonal space behind the high altar, often(‘prezbiterium’), roofed with a half-dome (‘apsyda’), arrangement, then it represents a triconch church is, a three-apsed(‘półkopuła, church. koncha’). The choir If the temple has three apses arrayed in a trefoil sits, typically in choir stalls (‘kościół trójkonchowy’), that the transepts and the chancel form (‘chóra cruciform kapłański’) church is, or the a crossarea wherechurch the choir (‘stalla’), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Framing
    TIMBER FRAMING ABUTMENT. In joinery, the end of one timber touching anoth- BORING MACHINE. A hand-cranked device with gears that er. See also BUTT JOINT. drive an auger bit, used to bore large holes, as in roughing out a ADZE. A handled edge tool (various patterns) with its edge at a mortise. right angle to the handle, used to shape or dress timbers. BOW. Deviation from straight in the length of a timber. Also AISLE. Lengthwise space (parallel to the roof ridge) in a building SWEEP. See also CROOK and CROWN . divided into several such spaces, usually three. Cf. BAY. BOXED HEART TIMBER. Timber whose section includes the ANCHOR BEAM. Major tie beam joined to H-bent posts, gen- heart of the tree. Since checks will not cross the heart, such a tim- erally with shouldered, outside-wedged through-tenons. ber can never split completely. Cf. FOHC. ARCH BRACE. 1. Curved brace. 2. Brace rising from bridge abut- BOX FRAME. Construction in which roof trusses are carried by a ment to support lower chord of truss. self-supporting structure of posts, tie beams and wall plates. Cf. ARRIS. The edge along which two adjacent surfaces meet. CRUCK FRAME. ASHLAR PIECE. Short vertical strut near the foot of a rafter, join- BRACE. Any diagonal timber (permanent or temporary) that ing it to a sole piece at the top of a masonry wall. resists distortion of a frame. See also KNEE BRACE. AUGER. A handled edge tool for boring holes in wood. BRACKET. Block tenoned or pegged to one timber to support BACKING.
    [Show full text]