Towards a Model of the Urban Development Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towards a Model of the Urban Development Process TOWARDS A MODEL OF THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS by Donald I. Gutstein B.Arch., University of British Columbia, 1968. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Architecture in the Department of Graduate Studies School of Architecture We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard The University of British Columbia October, 1972 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date ABSTRACT i TOWARDS A MODEL OF THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS In recent years, dissatisfaction with the quality of the urban environment has become widespread, and opposition to many development proposals has been mounted by citizens groups across Canada. Yet all attempts to improve the environment so far have proved relatively ineffectual. The thesis argues that the environment will continue to deteriorate unless massive changes are made in the structure of decision making which surrounds the urban development process; the major change required being meaningful partici- pation by citizens in making the decisions that affect their lives. A first step towards this goal is the attainment of a clear and comprehensive understanding of how urban develop- ment occurs at present. Citizens must be informed before they can be involved. The thesis presents an initial description of the urban development process and outlines the conceptual basis for the construction of a simulation model of the process. It is argued that because of the complexities of urban develop- ment, a simulation technique seems appropriate. Given an operating model, it would be possible to test proposals for change on the model before implementing them in reality. Using Metropolitan Vancouver - a typical Canadian urban region - as a data base, the thesis examines the types of public dissatisfactions with the urban environment. These are then translated into the more general categories of urban problems, such as soaring housing costs, transportation congestion, urban sprawl, poverty, pollution and so on. Through a literature survey a number of processes suspected as being related to these urban problems were identified. Two kinds of processes emerged: those which lead to population and economic growth (the ones usually considered in urban models), but also those processes which constrain policy formulation and implementation, such as fragmented authority, inadequate research and development, uncoordinated planning, the pressure of developers. Both types need inclusion in the model. These processes were investigated through a number of case studies of the system in action: downtown redevelopment schemes, Vancouver transportation proposals, a public urban renewal project, a shopping centre proposal, etc. Basic chronologies of events were prepared for each case; the events were then abstracted into a set of actions with the (organizational and individual) actors who engaged in them and the criteria (goals or constraints) upon which the actions were based. These actions were then grouped into related processes. A preliminary conceptual mock-up of the model was made, and a program of research outlined which involves the analysis of factors affecting major processes and the develop- ment of values suitable for computer manipulation. At this stage of the work it appears that the building of the model is indeed feasible and that such a simulation will prove most useful in understanding the urban development process. Supervisor iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I Introduction 1 A. Purpose of the Study 1 B. Outline of Work 8 CHAPTER II A Conceptual Framework 15 A. /Inappropriateness of the Concept of the Industry B. A Systems Approach to Urban Development 25 C. Changing for the Worse? 45 CHAPTER III The Urban Development Process 52 A. Urban Problems and Processes 52 B. Sample Problem/Process Analysis.. .. 64 C. Decision Making Models 83 CHAPTER IV The Urban Environment Production System (UEPS) 93 A. An Empirical Basis 93 B. The Organizational Constitution of UEPS 97 C. The Outputs of UEPS 112 D. Public Reaction to Urban Development 131 CHAPTER V The Vancouver Context 137 CHAPTER VI Towards a Model of the Urban Development Process 154 A. Analysis of Case Studies 154 B. A Diagram of the Urban Development Process.. 163 C. Future Work I84 NOTES I87 BIBLIOGRAPHY 197 iv APPENDIX A. Major Canadian Urban Problems and Factors which Generate Them. APPENDIX B. Profiles of Selected Development Companies and Financial Institutions. APPENDIX C. Major Building Permits Issued, City of Vancouver, 1957-70. APPENDIX D. A Sample of Public Reaction to Urban Developments in Vancouver. APPENDIX E. Chronologies of Case Studies 1. Coal Harbour Development Proposal 2. Freeway Proposals 3. Strathcona Urban Renewal Schemes V LIST OF TABLES Canadian Urban Problems Enumerated in Three Sample Sources 56 II Factors Leading to Major Urban Problems., 60 III Total Debt Outstanding by Capital Market Instrument, Canada, 1953 and 1967 69 IV Mortgage Loans Outstanding by Type of Investor, Canada, 1967 V Mortgage Investments of Financial Institutions and Other Investors as a Percentage of Total Assets, Canada, 1967... 77 VI Corporations & Labour Force Engaged in the Urban Development Process 98 VII Companies in Metropolitan Vancouver Engaged in Urban Development 100 VIII Major Public & Private Development Companies, Canada, 1970 101 IX Major Life Insurance Companies, Trust and Loan Companies and Chartered Banks, Canada, 110 1970 X Total Value of Construction Work Performed in Current Dollars, as a Percentage of Gross National Expenditure, Canada, 1961-70 113 XI Total Value of Construction Work Performed by Principal Type of Construction, Canada, 1967-70 H5 XII Total Value of Construction Work Performed by Type of Structure, Canada, 1970 118 XIII Dwelling Starts by Housing Type, Canada, 1961-70 121 XIV Total Value of Building Construction Work Performed by Building Type, Metropolitan Vancouver, 1961-70 122 vi XV Dwelling Starts by Housing Type, Metro- politan Vancouver, 1963-70 124 XVI Apartment Unit Completions by Municipality, Metropolitan Vancouver, 1963-68 126 XVII Major Construction Projects, Lower Mainland, 1966-68 127 XVIII Major Construction Projects by Principal Type of Construction, Lower Mainland, ' 1966-68 I30 XIX Possible Indices of Urban Health and Malaise I32 XX Examples of Public Reactions to Urban Development I35 XXI Sample Page from Chronology of Coal Harbour Redevelopment Proposal 156 XXII Preliminary Analysis of Coal Harbour Development Proposal Case Study 159 XXIII Municipal Rezoning Pattern of Events 162 vii LIST OF FIGURES 1 General Outline of the Urban Environment Production System (UEPS) 26 2 Major Participants and Influences on the Building Process 29 3 An Hierarchical Decision-Making Structure , (Hypothetical) 40 4 Possible Channels for the Transfer of Funds from Savers to Users 67 5 Private Capital Market Allocation of Funds... 71 6 Total Canadian Assets of Selected Financial Institutions, 1950-69 78 7 Total Mortgage Loans of Selected Financial Institutions, Canada, 1950-69 79 8 Conversion of Rural Land to Urban Uses 81 9 Municipal Government Urban Development Policy Process 10 Allocation of Funds - Municipal Government... 82 11 Urban Land Market 82 12 Dwelling Completions by Type of Construction Metropolitan Vancouver, 1963-70 125 13 Map of Downtown Vancouver 144 14 Diagram of the Urban Development Process 165 15 Distribution of Completed Developments 176 16 A Subculture/Activity Setting Model of Public Response to Developments., 183 viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am undebted to many people and organizations who helped in various aspects of this work. Part of the work was carried out under a Canada Council research grant. I am grateful for a Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation Fellowship which was of inestimable value during the two years of the project. Andrew Gruft and David Whetter helped with many of the knotty conceptual problems and David Whetter provided considerable help in the survey of existing data sources and the development of the case study method. To Rob Kleyn, for his work on the Coal Harbour study, to Charles Haynes, Ken Bartesko and Craig Strand for their work on the Freeways study, to Sherri Smith for the Strathcona Urban Renewal study and to the members of the Vancouver Urban Research Group for background material on the Vancouver City Hall organization, a special tanks. None of them should be held responsible for the use or misuse of their material. Finally, the deepest thanks to my typist Sandra Redmond who helped to sustain me during the darkest hours. CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION 1. PART A. - PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This paper is about the inability of citizens to participate positively and effectively in the development of their cities. Until recently citizens did nothing. They assumed that someone was running their cities in the best interests of the general public. Then things started going badly. Traffic congestion, inadequate housing, pollution, urban decay and sprawl had come to threaten every major Canadian city. People began to realize that the someone who did make the major decisions that affect their lives didn't know what he was doing, or if he did, it was only for the benefit of a lucky few. Plans for whole urban regions were predicated on the needs of a handful of developers and speculators and their real estate friends on municipal councils. People began to react. They opposed all major developments. They complained about the congestion, noise and pollution which would be generated by a scheme; they bitterly opposed the freeways deemed necessary to service these large developments; they pointed to the utter lack of human values in planning development.
Recommended publications
  • Vancouver Early Years Program
    Early Years Programs The following is a list of Early Years Programs (EYP) in the City of Vancouver. These programs offer drop-in sessions or registered programs for families to attend with young children. These programs include: A. Community Centres: A variety of programs available for registration for families and children of all ages. B. Family Places: Programs offered include drop-ins for parents, caregivers and children, peer counseling, prenatal programs, clothing exchanges, community kitchens and nutrition education. C. Neighourhood Houses: Various programs offered for all children and families, including newcomers, such as literacy, family resource programs, childcare and much more. D. Strong Start Programs: StrongStart is a free drop-in program in some Vancouver schools that is offered to parents and caregivers with children ages zero to five years old. You must register to attend. Visit Vancouver School Board website for registration information www.vsb.bc.ca/Student_Learning/Early-Learners/StrongStart. E. Vancouver Public Libraries: Public libraries are located around the City. Many programs, such as story times are offered for children, families and caregivers. Visit www.vpl.ca for hours, programs and locations. October 2018 Westcoast Child Care Resource Centre www.wccrc.ca| www.wstcoast.org A. Community Centres Centre Name Address Phone Neighourhood Website Number Britannia 1661 Napier 604-718-5800 Grandview- www.brittnniacentre.org Woodland Champlain Heights 3350 Maquinna 604-718-6575 Killarney www.champlainheightscc.ca
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Council Meeting – Agenda Note
    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING – AGENDA Agenda for the Regular Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. by electronic means via Zoom pursuant to Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General of the Province of British Columbia – Emergency Program Act, updated Ministerial Order No. M192. NOTE: Pursuant to the Provincial Health Officer Order regarding Gatherings and Events updated on December 2, 2020, members of the public are not permitted to attend Council meetings in person at this time due to COVID-19. Members of the public may view our Regular Council meeting by accessing the meeting via Zoom. For members of the public watching, staff will be moderating the meeting, but we ask that you please DO NOT turn on your camera or mic for the meeting until you are invited to do so by the Chair. *Should you wish to provide a comment or ask a question during Item 3 Public Input, or Item 17 Public Question Period please do so by: Sending an email to Karen Elrick by 4 p.m. prior to the meeting at [email protected] Using the “raise hand” function in the Zoom meeting to indicate you’d like to speak or turning on your mic when invited by the Chair To access the meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89911325354 THIS MEETING’S PROCEEDINGS WILL BE LIVE STREAMED VIA ZOOM AND AVAILABLE AS A RECORDED ARCHIVE ON THE VILLAGE WEBSITE 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of the Agenda Recommendation: That the Agenda be approved as circulated. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Statements and Schedules of Financial Information
    Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Statements and Schedules of Financial Information Year Ended March 31, 2020 Table of Contents Statement of Financial Information Approval 1 Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements 2 Independent Auditor’s Report 4 Actuary’s Report 7 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 8 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss 9 Consolidated Statement of Changes In Equity 10 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 11 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 12 Corporate Governance 77 Schedule of Guarantees and Indemnities 78 Schedule of Debts 79 Financial Information Reconciliation 80 Remuneration and Expenses Paid to Employees 81 Remuneration and Expenses Paid to Members of the Board of Directors 101 Amounts Paid to Suppliers for Goods and Services 103 Plaintiff Firm Payments 141 Statements and Schedules of Financial Information 2019/20 Statement of Financial Information Approval The undersigned represents the Board of Directors of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and approves the information contained in the Statements and Schedules of Financial Information prepared in accordance with the Financial Information Act and including voluntary disclosure of other financial information. Joy MacPhail Chair of the Board of Directors September 23, 2020 1 Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements Scope of Responsibility Management prepares the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related
    [Show full text]
  • Special Commission Skytrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements
    Special Commission SkyTrain Extension Review Final Report May, 1999 Acknowledgements The Special Commissioner gratefully acknowledges the generous and dedicated support and advice of the agencies, organizations and individuals that contributed to the Special Commission SkyTrain Review. The cooperation and assistance of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink); Greater Vancouver Regional District; City of Vancouver; City of New Westminster; City of Burnaby; City of Coquitlam; City of Port Moody; Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Environment Canada; Health Canada; Canadian Coast Guard; BC Transportation Financing Authority; BC Assets and Land Corporation; Simon Fraser Health Region; and BC Ministries of Environment, Lands and Parks, Transportation and Highways, Municipal Affairs, Small Business, Tourism and Culture were instrumental to the work of the Special Commission. The cooperation of the BC Environmental Assessment Office in providing considerable technical and administrative resources and support is greatly appreciated. In addition, the Special Commissioner particularly wishes to thank the members of the public and organizations who made submissions or participated in the workshops or public meetings for their efforts in the public interest. Staff Seconded to Special Commission David Johns, Kim Fawthorpe, Michael Price, Paul Finkel, Alan Calder, Mel Turner, Jennifer Kay, Tami Payne, Shari Steinbach, Sylvia Hinks, Eileen Bennett, Tanya Paz, and Joy Cohen. Environmental Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting of Education
    VANCOUVER BOARD OF EDUCATION VANCOUVERBOARD BOARD MEETING OF EDUCATION BOARD MEETING Monday, September 28, 2020 REVISED AGENDA at 7:00 pm 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 1.1 INDIGENOUS LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The meeting is being held on the traditional unceded territory of the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Nations. 1.2 OPENING REMARKS The meeting is being live-streamed and the audio and visual recording will also be available to the public for viewing after the meeting. The footage of the meeting may be viewed inside and outside of Canada. 2. SWEARING IN CEREMONY OF STUDENT TRUSTEE 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1 Meeting of June 22, 2020 3.2 Matters Arising from the Minutes 3.3 Meeting of August 19, 2020 3.4 Matters Arising from the Minutes 4. SUPERINTENDENT’S UPDATE 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS 5.1 FACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE 5.1.1 Report: Meeting of September 23, 2020 5.1.2 Matters Arising 5.1.2.1 2019 Draft LRFP Update Process and Timeline That the Board of Education approve the updated process and timeline for the 2019 Draft Long Range Facilities Plan. 5.1.2.2 Standards Pertaining to Building Accessibility That the Board adopt and implement written standards regarding accessibility of existing and future infrastructure that lie within the authority of the District. 5.1.2.3 Henry Hudson Elementary – Offer to Lease the 3rd floor for Childcare Facility 5.1.2.3.1 That the Board of Education of School District No. 39 (Vancouver) approve by bylaw, subject to Ministry approval, the proposed lease of the 3rd floor of Hendry Hudson Elementary School by the City of Vancouver for the purpose of operating a childcare centre (the “Henry Hudson Elementary Childcare Lease Bylaw 2020”) on the terms set out in Attachment A; 5.1.2.3.2 That the Board of Education of School District No.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Financial Plan 2012
    2012 PROVISIONAL FINANCIAL PLAN 2012 PROVISIONAL FINANCIAL PLAN CITY OF BURNABY Produced by the Finance Department at the City of Burnaby, in cooperation with all civic departments, offices and agencies. Designer: Carolyn Pang City of Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE 11 Mayor and Council 12 City Manager 14 Engineering 15 Finance 16 Planning & Building 17 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 18 Financial Plan Overview 21 Planning Process 22 Capital & Operating Reserves OPERATING PLAN 28 Five Year Operating Summary 30 Summary of Expenditures and Revenue 34 City Council 35 Donation and Grant Expenditures 37 City Manager 46 Engineering 49 Finance 50 Planning & Building 51 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 52 Fiscal Items 53 Tax Levies 54 CAPITAL PROGRAM » 2012 PROVISIONAL FINANCIAL PLAN MESSAGE FROM 1 THE MAYOR Burnaby City Council is committed to maximizing your access to City information. To help achieve this goal, we have launched a new website. Please visit www.burnaby.ca to learn more about City plans, projects and initiatives and how you can be involved. Committed to economic, social & environmental sustainability. 6 On behalf of Burnaby City Council, I am pleased to present the 2012 Provisional Financial Plan. We look forward to keeping Burnaby one of the world’s best cities in which to live, work, learn and play. Maclean’s Magazine named Burnaby “best-run city in Canada” and described the City as a model for the country, noting that Burnaby is “lean, debt-free and offering great public services.” Our City’s performance in areas as diverse as socio-economics, crime, fire services, transportation, road and sewer conditions, economic development, and recreation spending were all contributing factors to this recognition, along with positive indicators of civic engagement, such as voter turnout and library use.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming Revenue Granted To, and Earned by Community Organizations - 2013/14 Full Report (By Community)
    Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch Gaming Revenue Granted to, and Earned by Community Organizations - 2013/14 Full Report (by community) Notes: ♦ Gaming event licence reported earnings as of July 4, 2014, including losses. It is estimated that total licensed gaming earnings in 2013/14 were approximately $37.8 million. ■ This report does not include, or show, unused grant funds returned by an organization. Grants Gaming Event Licences (reported earnings as of July 4, 2014) ♦ Social Community Special One Independent Wheel of City Organization Name Ticket Raffle Occasion Poker Total Gaming Grants Time Grants Bingo Fortune Casino 100 Mile House 100 Mile & District Minor Hockey Association $45,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 100 Mile House 100 Mile Elementary School PAC $6,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,210.00 100 Mile House 100 Mile House & District Figure Skating Club $13,475.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,561.99 100 Mile House 100 Mile House & District Women's Centre Society $17,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,000.00 100 Mile House 100 Mile House and District Soccer Association $26,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,160.00 100 Mile House 100 Mile House Community Club $0.00 $0.00 $24,071.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $24,071.56 100 Mile House 100 Mile House Food Bank Society $85,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $85,000.00 100 Mile House 100 Mile House Wranglers Junior B Hockey Club $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,501.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,501.00 100 Mile House
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC ACCOUNTS 2000/01 Ministry Abbreviations
    PublicAccounts 2000/01 SupplementaryInformation DetailedSchedulesofPayments PublicAccounts 2000/01 SupplementaryInformation DetailedSchedulesofPayments FortheFiscalYearEnded March31,2001 Detailed Schedules of Payments for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2001 (Unaudited) Contents Page Ministry Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................... 5 Summary of Payments .................................................................................................................................... 6 Members of the Legislative Assembly Compensation ....................................................................................... 7 Schedules of Salary and Travel Expenses for: Ministers ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Deputy Ministers and Associate Deputy Ministers................................................................................... 10 Order–In–Council, Other Appointees and Employees not Appointed under the Public Service Act........... 11 Other Employees................................................................................................................................... 19 Grants and Contributions................................................................................................................................ 26 Other Suppliers .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing
    AFFORDABLE HOUSING Choices for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities Zone 6 - Vancouver The Housing Listings is a resource directory of affordable housing in British Columbia and divides the Lower Mainland into 7 zones. Zone 6 identifies affordable housing in the City of Vancouver, which has been divided into 13 city neighbourhoods. The attached listings are divided into two sections. Section #1: Apply to The Housing Registry Section 1 - Lists developments that The Housing Registry accepts applications for. These developments are either managed by BC Housing, Non-Profit societies, or Co- Operatives. To apply for these developments, please complete an application form which is available from any BC Housing office, or download the form from www.bchousing.org/housing- assistance/rental-housing/subsidized-housing. Section #2: Apply directly to Non-Profit Societies and Housing Co-ops Section 2 - Lists developments managed by non-profit societies or co-operatives which maintain and fill vacancies from their own applicant lists. To apply for these developments, please contact the society or co-op using the information provided under "To Apply". Please note, some non-profits and co-ops close their applicant list if they reach a maximum number of applicants. In order to increase your chances of obtaining housing it is recommended that you apply for several locations at once. Housing for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities, Zone 6 - Vancouver February 2020 AFFORDABLE HOUSING SectionSection 1:1: ApplyApply toto TheThe HousingHousing RegistryRegistry forfor developmentsdevelopments inin thisthis section.section. Apply by calling 604-433-2218 or, from outside the Lower Mainland, 1-800-257-7756.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnaby Social Sustainability Strategy June 2011 Developing the Burnaby Social Sustainability Strategy Vision
    Burnaby Social Sustainability Strategy June 2011 Developing the Burnaby Social Sustainability Strategy Vision Burnaby Social Sustainability Strategy Table of Contents I. Introduction 2 Overview of the Process to Develop the Strategy 2 II. Understanding the Burnaby Context 6 Burnaby’s Strengths 6 Diverse, well-educated and engaged population 6 Exceptional community services and facilities 6 Outstanding educational institutions 6 Thriving arts, cultural, recreational and sports scene 6 Sound economic base 7 Variety of housing choices 7 Wealth of natural assets 7 Burnaby’s Challenges 8 Increasing cultural diversity 8 High level of poverty 9 Limited municipal access to fi nancial resources 9 Municipal Role 9 Key Partners 10 Non-profi t Agencies and Community Organizations 10 Provincial and Federal Governments 10 Burnaby Board of Trade/Business Associations/Tourism Burnaby 10 General Business Community 10 Burnaby School District and Other Schools 11 Fraser Health and Other Health Organizations 11 Educational Institutions (Colleges, Universities and Institutes) 11 Foundations and Other Funders 11 Faith and Ethno-Cultural Groups 11 Developers 11 Burnaby Residents 11 Local Media 11 Burnaby City Council launched the Social Sustainability Strategy III. Framework for the Social Sustainability Strategy 14 process in March 2010. Here, IV. Burnaby’s Social Sustainability Vision 16 Steering Committee members discuss strategic priorities for the Strategy. Table of Contents i V. 10 Year Goals 18 Community Inclusion 18 Community Liveability 18 Community Resilience
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 September 29
    1997 SEPTEMBER 29 A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 4949 Canada Way, Burnaby, B.C. on Monday, 1997 September 29 at 7:00 p.m .. PRESENT: His Worship Mayor D.P. Drummond, In the Chair Councillor D.R. Corrigan (arrived at 7:10 p.m.) Councillor D.N. Johnston Councillor D.A. Lawson Councillor L.A. Rankin Councillor C.M.H. Redman Councillor N.M. Volkow (arrived at 7:10 p.m.) Councillor J. Young ABSENT: Councillor D.G. Evans STAFF: Mr. R.H. Moncur, City Manager Mr. C.A. Turpin, Deputy City Manager (Corporate Services) Mr. G. Harvie, Deputy City Manager (Corp. Labour Relations) Mr. W.C. Sinclair, Director Engineering Mr. R. Earle, Director Finance Mr. D.G. Stenson, Director Planning & Building Ms. K. Friars, A/Director Recreation & Cultural Services Mrs. D.R. Comis, City Clerk Ms. G. McCaskie, Administrative Officer I 1. MINUTES The minutes of the regular Council Meeting and Caucus Meeting 'In Camera' held on 1997 September 22 then came forward for adoption. MOVED BY COUNCILLOR YOUNG: SECONDED BY COUNCILLOR LAWSON: "THAT the minutes of the regular Council Meeting and Caucus Meeting "In Camera" held on 1997 September 22 be adopted." CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY The minutes of the Public Hearing (Zoning) held on 1997 September 23 then came forward for adoption. - 1 - 1997 September 29 MOVED BY COUNCILLOR LAWSON: SECONDED BY COUNCILLOR JOHNSTON: "THAT the minutes of the Public Hearing (Zoning) held on 1997 September 23 be now adopted." CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2. DELEGATIONS The following wrote requesting an audience with Council: a) Allen LaCrois, Hean Wyle Peach Destefanis 1997 September 22 Re: Application for tax exempt status for Overlynn Mansion by Action Line Housing Society Speaker: Victor Stusiak b) Friends of Discovery Park 1 997 September 22 Re: RZ #69/96 - Gilmore Way Speakers: Dennis Danielson Parvin Chami c) James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Municipal Support for Child Care: Policy Options for the City of Surrey
    Enhancing Municipal Support for Child Care: Policy Options for the City of Surrey by Ana Molina B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2015 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Ana Molina 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2017 Approval Name: Ana Molina Degree: Master of Public Policy Title: Enhancing Municipal Support for Child Care: Policy Options for the City of Surrey Examining Committee: Chair: Doug McArthur Professor, School of Public Policy, SFU Kora DeBeck Senior Supervisor Assistant Professor John Richards Supervisor Professor Marina Adshade Internal Examiner Visiting Professor Date Defended/Approved: March 20, 2017 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract This study explores the role municipalities in British Columbia can play in addressing child care. It focuses on the City of Surrey, investigating what this rapidly growing municipality can do, within its jurisdictional authority, to enable and support the creation of high quality, affordable child care spaces. This study uses a literature review, jurisdictional scan and data gathered through qualitative interviews with municipal elected officials, planners and child care experts to identify and evaluate five policy options. Options are analysed using a standardized criteria and measures approach. This study concludes that the adoption of a non-profit support framework and the integration of child care into the City’s community amenity contributions approach are the most effective policy interventions for increasing the number of child care spaces, while ensuring high quality, affordability and accessibility objectives. Furthermore, it recognizes these interventions can be included within a more comprehensive strategy, maximizing flexibility and nimbleness.
    [Show full text]