Night of the Battleships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Night of the Battleships NIGHT OF THE BATTLESHIPS THE SECOND NAVAL BATTLE OF GUADALCANAL WAS A PIVOTAL MOMENT IN A TURNING POINT CAMPAIGN. RICHARD H. WAGNER (Originally published in The Log, Navy League of the United States, New York Council, Winter 2005) t the Battle of Midway, the action. It was not until the battleship United States Navy stopped the action that Japanese hopes of retaking Aforward advance of the Empire the island were ended. Moreover, the of Japan. However, by that time, the battleship action was a desperate gamble Japanese had conquered a great deal of that involved risking the last heavy territory and were poised to resume their surface force in the Pacific in a way that march. It was not until the Guadalcanal was contrary to established doctrine and campaign (August 1942 - February in a type of fighting that the Japanese 1943) that the Americans began to retake had shown themselves to be masters. territory and put the Japanese on the defensive. The bitter fighting on that island is legendary. However, there was also a series of naval actions off Guadalcanal that played a crucial role in the campaign. These were not what is USS WASHINGTON (BB 56) commonly thought of as the typical World War II naval action. Air power DISPLACEMENT: 41,000 full load only played a supporting part. The tons actions centered upon fierce night LENGTH: 729 feet surface actions in confined waters. BEAM: 108 feet The decisive naval actions of the SPEED: 28 knots campaign took place during the period POWER PLANT: Steam turbine 12 November to 15 November 1941. ARMAMENT: Nine 16 inch 45 These actions are called by a variety of caliber: names but the most common Twenty 5 inch 38 caliber; nomenclature is to call the Sixty 40mm; cruiser/destroyer action on the night of Thirty-six 20mm 12-13 November, the First Naval Battle CREW: 1,880 of Guadalcanal and the battleship action COMMISSIONED: 15 May 1941 on the night of 14-15 November, the DECOMMISSIONED: 27 June 1947 Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal. While popular histories have tended to focus on the cruiser/destroyer action, this article will focus on the battleship 1 Copyright Richard H. Wagner All rights reserved. This article may only be used by permission. The Campaign the airfield was completed it would pose a threat to the line of communication uadalcanal is the largest island in between the United States and Australia. the Solomons chain. It lies Moreover, it could be used to launch a Gsouth of the equator in the Coral new thrust towards Port Moseby, New Sea, southeast of New Guinea and Guinea - - the objective the Japanese had northeast of Australia. The Solomons been prevented from taking in the Battle are arranged in a loose column of twos of the Coral Sea. heading northwest from Guadalcanal Although the bulk of American toward Rabaul. The water lying resources was being sent to the European between the columns was nicknamed Theater, an amphibious assault force was "The Slot" by the Americans who fought quickly scraped together and on 7 in the Solomons campaign. At the August 1942, the First Marine Division Guadalcanal end of The Slot is another was landed on Guadalcanal and Marine body of water with an American Raiders on Tulagi where the Japanese nickname. It is bounded by Guadalcanal had built a seaplane base. The Marines on the south, Savo Island on the west, captured the Guadalcanal airfield the and Tulagi and Florida islands to the next day, renaming it Henderson Field north. The name for it is "Ironbottom after a Marine flyer killed at Midway. Sound." Then, things started to go bad. Prior to 1942, no one took much Upon hearing of the invasion, Vice interest in Guadalcanal. It was Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, IJN, led a discovered by Spanish explorers in the force of cruisers and destroyers from the 1560s but nothing came of their plan to large Japanese base at Rabaul down The colonize the island. The French Slot to attack the American ships rediscovered it in the 1700s but the supporting the invasion. His force malaria-ridden island was so devoid of entered Ironbottom Sound shortly after natural resources and inhabited by such midnight achieving complete surprise. cantankerous natives that no one wanted Four Allied heavy cruisers and a it. At the end of the 19th Century, the destroyer were sunk and another heavy European powers divided-up the Pacific cruiser and two destroyers damaged. Islands and Britain agreed to take However, concerned that his force might Guadalcanal. A few missionaries and be attacked by carrier-based aircraft if it coconut planters from Australia came to was still off Guadalcanal when daylight the island. However, with its over- broke, Mikawa decided to return to base powering smell of rotting vegetation, without attacking the defenseless dense jungle, swamps, meadows with transports unloading at the beachhead. seven foot tall grass that can cut through The Battle of Savo Island was thus a clothing, and steep mountains, the island humiliating defeat but at least it was not went undeveloped. a complete disaster. In July 1942, aerial Ironically, Mikawa need not have reconnaissance detected that the worried. Rear Admiral Frank J. Fletcher, Japanese were constructing an airfield USN, had withdrawn the three aircraft on Guadalcanal. This information carriers that had covered the landings on required immediate action because when the grounds that his fighter strength had 2 Copyright Richard H. Wagner All rights reserved. This article may only be used by permission. been greatly reduced as a result of of action by a torpedo in the same operations and that his ships were engagement. starting to run low on fuel. Since after On the night of 11 October, a the Savo debacle there was practically force of cruisers and destroyers under nothing left to defend the transports, the command of RADM Norman Scott, they were withdrawn on 9 August after USN, intercepted two Japanese cruisers unloading only half their cargoes. and two destroyers, which were on the Consequently, the Marines were left way to bombard Henderson Field. In the holding a small area around the airfield Battle of Cape Esperance, one Japanese with very little supplies. cruiser was sunk and the other badly Using captured Japanese damaged at the cost of one destroyer construction equipment, the Marines sunk, and a light cruiser and a destroyer finished the airfield in early September damaged. and an assortment of Marine, Army, and Two nights later, however, the Navy aircraft were flown in. "The battleships KONGO and HARUNA Cactus Air Force," named for the code appeared in Ironbottom Sound and name for Guadalcanal, gave the bombarded Henderson Field destroying Americans air superiority. However, the 48 aircraft. Although determined attacks campaign stalemated. Each side by PT boats made the battleships so funneled in reinforcements, the nervous that they went away, cruisers Americans by freighter during daylight, carried on the bombardment the next two the Japanese by the "Tokyo Express" - - nights. primarily destroyers that would speed Another carrier engagement took down The Slot at night bringing supplies place on 26-27 October, when and reinforcements. Still, despite heavy ENTERPRISE and USS HORNET (CV fighting, the Americans (including Army 8) encountered four carriers sent to cover troops landed in October) could not a major land offensive directed at advance and the Japanese could not retaking Henderson Field. Two retake the airfield. Japanese carriers were knocked out of Meanwhile, offshore, the fighting commission but HORNET was sunk in was similarly intense. On 24 August, a the Battle of Santa Cruz Islands. This force built around USS SARATOGA left the damaged ENTERPRISE as the (CV 3), USS ENTERPRISE (CV 6), and only operational carrier in the Pacific. USS NORTH CAROLINA (BB 55) engaged a force centered around three The Barroom Brawl Japanese carriers and sank the carrier RYUJO. Shortly after the Battle of the y early November, the Japanese Eastern Solomons, SARATOGA was realized that two conditions had torpedoed by a submarine and rendered Bto be met in order to win on out of action for three months. USS Guadalcanal. First, the Japanese had to WASP (CV 7) was not as lucky. She significantly outnumber the Americans was torpedoed and sunk while escorting on the ground. This would require a a group of transports to Guadalcanal. large-scale reinforcement of the NORTH CAROLINA was also put out garrison. Second, Henderson Field had to be neutralized so as to give the 3 Copyright Richard H. Wagner All rights reserved. This article may only be used by permission. Japanese control of the air and the seas. relief force would not arrive in time and The Cactus Air Force was shooting that defending the island was up to the down Japanese planes at a ratio of 10 to convoy escort ships. one. Accordingly, between 2 November After thwarting an attack on the and 10 November, 65 destroyer loads of transports by Japanese bombers on the troops landed on the island tipping the afternoon of 12 November, Callaghan scale so that the Japanese outnumbered took the transports to sea. After dark, the Americans for the first time. the escort ships broke away from the Furthermore, on 11 November, the transports and formed into a line of Japanese assembled eleven transports battle to wait for the Japanese in loaded with 13,500 troops and supplies. Ironbottom Sound. Unfortunately, This convoy would be supported by a Callaghan had little experience with battle group centered upon the radar and put the ships with the best battleships HIEI and KIRISHIMA. In radar, USS FLETCHER (DD 455) at the addition to escorting the convoy, this end of the column.
Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 June;38(2)
    9^k^c\VcY=neZgWVg^XBZY^X^cZKdajbZ(-Cd#'?jcZ'%%- EJGEDH:HD;I=:HD8>:I>:H IdegdbdiZVcY[VX^a^iViZi]ZhijYnd[VaaVheZXihd[jcYZglViZgVcY]neZgWVg^XbZY^X^cZ Idegdk^YZ^c[dgbVi^dcdcjcYZglViZgVcY]neZgWVg^XbZY^X^cZ IdejWa^h]V_djgcVaVcYidXdckZcZbZbWZghd[ZVX]HdX^ZinVccjVaanViVhX^Zci^ÄXXdc[ZgZcXZ HDJI=E68>;>8JC9:GL6I:G :JGDE:6CJC9:GL6I:G6C9 B:9>8>C:HD8>:IN 76GDB:9>86AHD8>:IN D;;>8:=DA9:GH D;;>8:=DA9:GH EgZh^YZci EgZh^YZci 9gB^`Z7ZccZii 1B#7ZccZii5jchl#ZYj#Vj3 Egd[#6a[7gjWV`` 1Va[#d#WgjWV``5cicj#cd3 EVhiçEgZh^YZci K^XZEgZh^YZci 9g8]g^h6Xdii 1XVXdii5deijhcZi#Xdb#Vj3 9gEZiZg<Zgbdceg 1eZiZg#\ZgbdcegZ5b^a#WZ3 HZXgZiVgn >bbZY^ViZEVhiEgZh^YZci 9gHVgV]AdX`aZn 1hejbhhZXgZiVgn5\bV^a#Xdb3 9gCdZb^7^iiZgbVc 1cdZb^W5im#iZX]c^dc#VX#^a3 IgZVhjgZg EVhiEgZh^YZci 9g<jnL^aa^Vbh 1hejbh5[VhibV^a#cZi3 9gGVb^gd8Va^"8dgaZd 1^gdXVa^5YVcZjgdeZ#dg\3 :YjXVi^dcD[ÄXZg =dcdgVgnHZXgZiVgn 9g9Vk^YHbVgi 1YVk^Y#hbVgi5Y]]h#iVh#\dk#Vj3 9g?dZg\HX]bjio 1_dZg\#hX]bjio5]^c#X]3 EjWa^XD[ÄXZg BZbWZgViAVg\Z'%%, 9gKVcZhhV=VaaZg 1kVcZhhV#]VaaZg5XYbX#Xdb#Vj3 9gE]^a7gnhdc 1e]^a#Wgnhdc5YYgX#dg\3 8]V^gbVc6CO=B< BZbWZgViAVg\Z'%%+ 9g9Vk^YHbVgi 1YVk^Y#hbVgi5Y]]h#iVh#\dk#Vj3 Egd[#BV^YZ8^bh^i 1bX^bh^i5^hiVcWja#ZYj#ig3 8dbb^iiZZBZbWZgh BZbWZgViAVg\Z'%%* 9g<aZc=Vl`^ch 1]Vl`ZnZ5hl^[iYha#Xdb#Vj3 9g6gb^c@ZbbZg 1Vgb^c5`ZbbZgh#YZ3 9gHVgV]H]Vg`Zn 1hVgV]#h]Vg`Zn5YZ[ZcXZ#\dk#Vj3 9gHXdiiHfj^gZh 1hXdii#hfj^gZh5YZ[ZcXZ#\dk#Vj3 69B>C>HIG6I>DC 69B>C>HIG6I>DC BZbWZgh]^e =dcdgVgnIgZVhjgZgBZbWZgh]^eHZXgZiVgn HiZkZ<dWaZ 1hejbhVYb5W^\edcY#cZi#Vj3 EVig^X^VLddY^c\ &+7jghZab6kZcjZ!=V^cVjai!>a[dgY B:B7:GH=>E :hhZm!><+(:=!Jc^iZY@^c\Ydb
    [Show full text]
  • July 2004 Contact: [email protected], Or Check out Web Site
    “We will always remember. We will always be proud. July We will always be prepared, so we may always be free.” August President Ronald Reagan September June 6, 1984 - Normandy, France 2004 "Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide firepower for freedom…” THE JERSEYMAN Long Beach, California...December 28, 1982 President Ronald Reagan at the 4th Recommissioning of USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) “...Well, the New Jersey today becomes our 514th ship and represents our determination to rebuild the strength of America's right arm so that we can preserve the peace. After valiant service in Vietnam and after saving the lives of countless Ma- rines, the New Jersey was decommissioned in 1969. During that solemn ceremony, her last commanding officer, Captain Robert Peniston, spoke prophetically when he suggested that this mighty ship, “Rest well, yet sleep lightly; and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide fire power for freedom.” Well, the call has been sounded. America needs the bat- tleship once again to provide firepower for the defense of freedom and, above all, to maintain the peace. She will truly fulfill her mission if her firepower never has to be used. Captain Fogarty, I hereby place the United States Ship New Jersey in commission. God bless, and Godspeed.” In Memory of President Ronald Wilson Reagan Commander In Chief THE JERSEYMAN n May 29, 2004, formal dedication of the WW2 National Memorial took place in Washington, DC. The event was simulcast to the Battleship New Jersey Memorial and Mu- seum, with an audience estimated at well over 1,100 WW2 Veterans and their guests, plus 800 guests that were general public attendees.
    [Show full text]
  • January Cover.Indd
    Accessories 1:35 Scale SALE V3000S Masks For ICM kit. EUXT198 $16.95 $11.99 SALE L3H163 Masks For ICM kit. EUXT200 $16.95 $11.99 SALE Kfz.2 Radio Car Masks For ICM kit. KV-1 and KV-2 - Vol. 5 - Tool Boxes Early German E-50 Flakpanzer Rheinmetall Geraet sWS with 20mm Flakvierling Detail Set EUXT201 $9.95 $7.99 AB35194 $17.99 $16.19 58 5.5cm Gun Barrels For Trumpter EU36195 $32.95 $29.66 AB35L100 $21.99 $19.79 SALE Merkava Mk.3D Masks For Meng kit. KV-1 and KV-2 - Vol. 4 - Tool Boxes Late Defender 110 Hardtop Detail Set HobbyBoss EUXT202 $14.95 $10.99 AB35195 $17.99 $16.19 Soviet 76.2mm M1936 (F22) Divisional Gun EU36200 $32.95 $29.66 SALE L 4500 Büssing NAG Window Mask KV-1 Vol. 6 - Lubricant Tanks Trumpeter KV-1 Barrel For Bronco kit. GMC Bofors 40mm Detail Set For HobbyBoss For ICM kit. AB35196 $14.99 $14.99 AB35L104 $9.99 EU36208 $29.95 $26.96 EUXT206 $10.95 $7.99 German Heavy Tank PzKpfw(r) KV-2 Vol-1 German Stu.Pz.IV Brumbar 15cm STuH 43 Gun Boxer MRAV Detail Set For HobbyBoss kit. Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzer Wheel mask For Basic Set For Trumpeter kit - TR00367. Barrel For Dragon kit. EU36215 $32.95 $29.66 AB35L110 $9.99 Academy kit. AB35212 $25.99 $23.39 Churchill Mk.VI Detail Set For AFV Club kit. EUXT208 $12.95 SALE German Super Heavy Tank E-100 Vol.1 Soviet 152.4mm ML-20S for SU-152 SP Gun EU36233 $26.95 $24.26 Simca 5 Staff Car Mask For Tamiya kit.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGLEY, LEX and SARA by Scot Macdonald ‘It Is the Navy's Mission to Protect Our Coasts, Our Seaborne Commerce, and Far-Flung Possessions
    ANCHORED IN SAN DIEGO harbor January 1933, U.S. Navy’s first the recent past. At right is USS Constitution. “Old Ironsides” was aircraft carrier, USS Langley, provides a startlinq contrast against then on her last major voyage, a tour of important U.S. seaports. Evolution of Aircraft Carriers LANGLEY, LEX AND SARA By Scot MacDonald ‘It is the Navy's mission to protect our coasts, our seaborne commerce, and far-flung possessions. Once war is forced upon us we must take the offensive to win it. The Navy is the first line of offense, and Naval Aviation as an advance guard of this line must deliver the brunt of the attack. Naval Aviation cannot take the offensive from shore; it must go to sea on the back of the fleet. I do not believe aircraft on shore can ward off a bombing attack launched, perhaps, from carriers by night from an unknown point for an unknown objective. On the other hand, a fleet with adequate aviation of its own can drive the carriers back out of effective range. Both for offense and defense the fleet and Naval Aviation are one and inseparable.’ —R.Adm. William A. Moffett, USN, October 1925, in the U.S. Naval Institute Proccedings NE DAY," said Capt. Thomas T. Jason. Although some conservative Returning to America, he immedi- O Craven, who had relieved Capt. seniors frowned on the plan, in time ately studied the problems of strength- Noble E. Irwin as Director of Naval and with the Secretary of the ening the Navy’s complement of pilots Aviation in May 1919, "one day, when Navy’s approval, we persuaded Con- and support personnel, obtaining "ap- someone suggested that shoveling coal gressional committees of the wisdom paratus suitable for their use,” and was becoming unpopular, we proceeded of converting one ship, the Jupiter, developing tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreadnought, HMS | International Encyclopedia of the First World War
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 13 January 2016 Dreadnought, HMS By John Abbatiello Adopted in 1906, HMS Dreadnought represented an innovative battleship design that changed the nature of the Anglo- German naval race preceding the Great War. A hybrid Dreadnought battlecruiser design soon followed; by 1914, all major navies measured their strength by the number of Dreadnought battleships and battlecruisers they possessed. Table of Contents 1 Pre-war Battleship Design 2 Dreadnought Design Innovations 3 Ship History 4 Impact Selected Bibliography Citation Pre-war Battleship Design Technological development during the steamship age pushed 19th century warship design to its limits, featuring battleships mounting large caliber, turreted guns, driven by high output piston steam engines, and protected by steel armor. By the turn of last century, a typical battleship mounted four 12-inch guns in two twin-turrets and was armed with an assortment of intermediate gun batteries throughout the ship. Reciprocating steam engines produced enough power to drive the ships to high speeds, typically fifteen to eighteen knots. Major drawbacks of these designs included difficulty in fire control for the different caliber ammunition. Also, the steam engines required lengthy periods in port for maintenance overhauls and could not be run at full speed for very long without risking breakdowns. Early in the 20th century, British Admiralty leaders learned of plans by American, Italian and Japanese navies to design and build “all big gun” battleships, a concept publicized by Italian naval engineer Vittorio Cuniberti (1854-1913) in 1903. Led by First Sea Lord, Sir John Fisher (1841-1920), British decision makers designed the HMS Dreadnought to steal the lead on the plans of other navies and launch a battleship that would outfight any ship afloat.
    [Show full text]
  • July Slater Signals
    SLATER SIGNALS The Newsletter of the USS SLATER's Volunteers By Timothy C. Rizzuto, Executive Director Destroyer Escort Historical Museum USS Slater DE-766 PO Box 1926 Albany, NY 12201-1926 Phone (518) 431-1943, Fax 432-1123 Vol. 18 No. 7, July 2015 It’s hard to believe that the summer is half over and I’m already writing the July SIGNALS. We had some very special visitors this month. First and foremost were Dale and Linda Drake. This was special because Linda is the daughter of the late Master Chief Gunner’s Mate Sam Saylor and, it’s safe to say, without Sam Saylor, there would be no USS SLATER preservation. Linda recalled that for years her visits were constantly interrupted with Sam's words, "Well, I take care of some SLATER business." It was the ship that was Sam's focus and sustained him through the last 20 years of his life. Linda and Dale made the trip from Omaha specifically to see USS SLATER because this was Linda’s first chance to see the fruit of all her father’s effort. Board President Tony Esposito greeted them as they toured the ship from stem to stern. Linda’s husband Dale is a former Marine, and he left Linda on the Observation Deck so he could take the bilge tour. He wanted to see everything. I do believe if we could get them to relocate to Albany we’d have two more dedicated volunteers. Linda brought along Sam's burial flag which we will fly for the month of August and then retire it to the USS CONNOLLY display in Sam’s honor.
    [Show full text]
  • 164Th Infantry News: September 1998
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons 164th Infantry Regiment Publications 9-1998 164th Infantry News: September 1998 164th Infantry Association Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/infantry-documents Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation 164th Infantry Association, "164th Infantry News: September 1998" (1998). 164th Infantry Regiment Publications. 55. https://commons.und.edu/infantry-documents/55 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in 164th Infantry Regiment Publications by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE 164TH INFANTRY NEWS Vot 38 · N o, 6 Sepitemlber 1, 1998 Guadalcanal (Excerpts taken from the book Orchids In The Mud: Edited by Robert C. Muehrcke) Orch id s In The Mud, the record of the 132nd Infan try Regiment, edited by Robert C. Mueherke. GUADALCANAL AND T H E SOLOMON ISLANDS The Solomon Archipelago named after the King of Kings, lie in the Pacific Ocean between longitude 154 and 163 east, and between latitude 5 and 12 south. It is due east of Papua, New Guinea, northeast of Australia and northwest of the tri angle formed by Fiji, New Caledonia, and the New Hebrides. The Solomon Islands are a parallel chain of coral capped isles extending for 600 miles. Each row of islands is separated from the other by a wide, long passage named in World War II "The Slot." Geologically these islands are described as old coral deposits lying on an underwater mountain range, whi ch was th rust above the surface by long past volcanic actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Shipbuilding Expansion: the World War II Surface Combatant Experience
    Naval Shipbuilding Expansion: The World War II Surface Combatant Experience Dr. Norbert Doerry1 (FL), Dr. Philip Koenig1, P.E. (FL) 1. Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C. From the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991 to the present day, the U.S. Navy has exercised uncontested control of the high seas. In the absence of peer naval competition, the surface combatant force was re-oriented towards land attack and near-shore operations in support of power projection. This historically unprecedented strategic situation appears to be nearing its end with the rapid growth and reach of the new 21st century Chinese navy and the reinvigoration of the Russian fleet. In response, U.S. Navy strategic planning has been re-balanced towards naval warfare against growing peer competitors, and the naval shipbuilding program is being ramped up. The last time this took place was in the run-up to World War II. What can we learn from that experience, so that the currently planned buildup can be as effective as possible? This paper offers an introductory examination of how the U.S. planned, designed, and built the surface combatant fleet during the interwar period (1920-1941), with a focus on destroyers. After accounting for differences in warship complexity and the industrial and shipbuilding capabilities of the United States of the 1930’s and 1940’s as compared to today, lessons for today’s surface combatant designers and program managers are identified and discussed. Recommendations are made for further work. KEY WORDS nuclear, industrial-scale war can no longer be dismissed.
    [Show full text]
  • LEFT to DIE Produced, Written & Directed by Kenneth A. Simon Www
    LEFT TO DIE Produced, Written & Directed by Kenneth A. Simon www.simonpure.com OPEN NARRATOR: On Friday, November 13, 1942, the cruiser USS Juneau disintegrated when hit by a Japanese torpedo just hours after surviving a vicious World War II sea battle. Most of its 700-man crew were instantly killed. But 140 were thrown alive into the angry waters off Guadalcanal. Only 10 ultimately survived. The Navy glorified the crew’s heroic deaths. But the scandalous story of how the Juneau crew was left to die is a heartbreaking tragedy of American military errors. TITLE: LEFT TO DIE: THE TRAGEDY OF THE USS JUNEAU JAMES SULLIVAN (Son of Albert Sullivan): This is a picture of the five Sullivan Brothers -- my father and my four uncles. They all served together in the Navy on the USS Juneau. And this is Joe, my Dad Al, George, Frank and Matt. They were known as the "Fighting Sullivans" NARRATOR: Thomas and Alleta Sullivan of Waterloo, Iowa, were destined to suffer an unprecedented loss in battle of five sons. NEWSREEL “Dad, our boys did not die in vain.” SULLIVAN: My grandfather was a brakeman on the Illinois Central Railroad. They were your typical Irish Catholic family. The boys liked to get in trouble a little bit, but they didn't get in any bad trouble. My dad, he was the youngest. He was 19 and he was the only one that was married at the time. Their motto, "We stick together" was true from the time they were little kids. NARRATOR: After the December, 1941, surprise Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, the Sullivan Brothers decided to join up together, but only if they could serve on the same ship.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION 231 Closing Tuesday December 10, 2019
    AUCTION 231 Closing Tuesday December 10, 2019 1594 Ex 2297 1890 701 603 1630 2367 VIEW THIS AUCTION ONLINE AT WWW.AUCKLANDCITYSTAMPS.CO.NZ No Buyer’s Commission PO Box 99988 Newmarket Auckland 1149 NZ • Ph +64 9 522 0311 • Fax +64 9 522 0313 • Email [email protected] Ex 30 235 261 257 Ex 31 252 264 249 Ex 255 256 Ex 271 Ex 438 Ex 440 Ex 443 Ex 452 1044 616 Ex 832 Ex 1327 Ex 1356 Ex 1432 Ex 1485 Ex 1582 Ex 1620 1629 1631 1632 - Plate 1 - 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1654 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 Ex 1664 1666 1668 1676 1678 1679 1680 1684 1693 1691 1700 1712 Ex 1721 1731 - Plate 2 - 1772 1783 1794 1796 1797 1792 1817 1057 1848 1893 1894 1966 2089 1971 1973 1980 1987 1988 2054 2023 2024 2012 2016 2014 2013 2001 2003 Ex 2104 2184 2185 2197 2198 2218 2205 2202 2207 - Plate 3 - Welcome To Auckland City Stamps Auction 231 Welcome to Postal Auction 231 which contains 2833 lots of World & New Zealand Stamps & Covers and closes on Tuesday December10, 2019. In World Stamps the highlights are French Antarctic (See Lots 229-425), Lot 603 Great Britain 1902/10 KEVII £1 Dull Blue Green SG 266 Mint (Est $1600), Lot 701 Great Britain 1929 £1 PUC Mint (Est $800), Lot 1321 Pitcairn Island 1925 Posted at Pitcairn Island/No Stamps Available Forerunner Cover (Est $1250), and Lots 1593-1595 USA 1930 Zeppelins Mint.
    [Show full text]