DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Use the Herbicide Classification Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Use the Herbicide Classification Chart The Herbicide Classifi cation Chart is your QUICK START GUIDE most important tool for taking action against HOW TO USE THE HERBICIDE your worst weeds. By knowing herbicide groups by their site of action (SOA), you CLASSIFICATION CHART can diversify your herbicide applications to reduce your risk of herbicide resistance. The left half of the chart classifi es herbicides by HERBICIDE their mode of action (MOA). CLASSIFICATION REPEATED USE OF HERBICIDES WITH THE SAME SITE OF ACTION CAN RESULT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE-RESISTANT WEED POPULATIONS. For example, Groups 2 and 9 are both Amino Acid MODE OF This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist you This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade by in selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in herbicide by PREMIX names so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides ACTION use and 2) to rotate among effective herbicides with different sites and their respective site-of-action groups. Refer to the Site- (effect on plant growth) of action to delay the development of herbicide resistance. of-Action chart on the left for more information. Synthesis Inhibitors, which means their MOA is to SITE-OF-ACTION NUMBER OF COMPONENT COMPONENT GROUP RESISTANT WEED SPECIES SITE-OF-ACTION SITE-OF-ACTION IN U.S. GROUP GROUP shut down amino acid production necessary for SITE OF CHEMICAL ACTIVE PRODUCT ACTIVE TRADE ACTIVE TRADE ACTION FAMILY INGREDIENT EXAMPLES (TRADE NAME®) PREMIX INGREDIENT NAME® PREMIX INGREDIENT NAME® LIPID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS bicyclopyrone ––––– 27 acetochlor Harness 15 HARNESS XTRA clodinafop Discover NG mesotrione Callisto 27 atrazine AAtrex 5 ACURON* cyhalofop Clincher protein synthesis. atrazine AAtrex 5 clopyralid Stinger 4 Aryloxyphenoxypro- fenoxaprop HORNET pionate (fops) Ricestar, Tecoma, others s-metolachlor Dual II Magnum 15 flumetsulam Python 2 fluazifop Fusilade DX ACCASE INHIBITORS AFFINITY BROADSPEC thifensulfuron Harmony 2 pyrasulfotole ––––– 27 1 15 HUSKIE (acetyl CoA carboxylase) quizalofop Assure II, Targa (Affinity Tankmix) tribenuron Express 2 bromoxynil Buctril 6 clethodim Select Max, others Cyclohexanedione (dims) thifensulfuron Harmony 2 pyrasulfotole ––––– 27 sethoxydim Poast, Poast Plus AFFORIA tribenuron Express 2 HUSKIE COMPLETE bromoxynil Buctril 6 Phenylpyrazolin pinoxaden Axial XL flumioxazin Valor 14 thiencarbazone Varro 2 dicamba Clarity 4 rimsulfuron Resolve, Matrix 2 AMINO ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS INSTIGATE thifensulfuron Harmony 2 mesotrione Callisto 27 AGILITY SG imazamox Raptor, Beyond, Clearmax tribenuron Express 2 KEYSTONE NXT acetochlor Surpass NXT 15 imazapic Plateau (Keystone LA NXT) Imidazolinone metsulfuron Ally 2 atrazine AAtrex 5 But Groups 2 and 9 are also broken into their SOA. imazaquin Scepter thifensulfuron Harmony 2 rimsulfuron Resolve 2 LEADOFF imazethapyr Pursuit, Newpath ALLY EXTRA tribenuron Express 2 thifensulfuron Harmony 2 Pyrimidinylthiobenzoic bispyribac Regiment metsulfuron Ally 2 mesotrione Callisto 27 acid pyrithiobac Staple pyroxasulfone Zidua 15 LEXAR EZ s-metolachlor Dual II Magnum 15 ANTHEM flucarbazone Everest, Pre-Pare, Sierra fluthiacet Cadet 14 atrazine AAtrex 5 Sulfonylaminocarbonyl- Group 2 are ALS inhibitors, which inhibits the enzyme propoxycarbazone Olympus triazolinones pyroxasulfone Zidua 15 mesotrione Callisto 27 thiencarbazone Varro ANTHEM ATZ fluthiacet Cadet 14 LUMAX EZ s-metolachlor Dual II Magnum 15 bensulfuron Londax atrazine AAtrex 5 atrazine AAtrex 5 chlorimuron Classic pyroxasulfone Zidua 15 dicamba Clarity 4 ANTHEM FLEX MARKSMAN chlorsulfuron Glean carfentrazone Aim 14 atrazine AAtrex 5 halosulfuron Permit sulfentrazone 14 fluthiacet 14 acetolactate synthase (ALS) as their SOA, while Group 9 Spartan Cadet AUTHORITY ASSIST MARVEL iodosulfuron Autumn imazethapyr Pursuit 2 fomesafen Flexstar 14 mesosulfuron Osprey sulfentrazone Spartan 14 primisulfuron Beacon 2 AUTHORITY ELITE NORTHSTAR ALS INHIBITORS metsulfuron Ally 2 45 s-metolachlor Dual Magnum 15 dicamba Clarity 4 (acetolactate synthase) nicosulfuron Accent Q sulfentrazone Spartan 14 clomazone Command 13 AUTHORITY FIRST OBEY orthosulfamuron Strada Sulfonylurea cloransulam FirstRate 2 quinclorac Facet 4 includes glyphosate, which inhibits the chloroplast primisulfuron Beacon sulfentrazone Spartan 14 saflufenacil Sharpen 14 AUTHORITY MTZ OPTILL prosulfuron Peak metribuzin Metribuzin 5 imazethapyr Pursuit 2 rimsulfuron Resolve, Matrix AUTHORITY XL sulfentrazone Spartan 14 saflufenacil Sharpen 14 sulfosulfuron Maverick (Authority Maxx) chlorimuron Classic 2 OPTILL PRO imazethapyr Pursuit 2 thifensulfuron Harmony iodosulfuron Autumn 2 dimethenamid-P Outlook 15 AUTUMN SUPER enolpyruvyl shikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) triasulfuron Amber thiencarbazone Varro 2 florasulam ––––– 2 ORION tribenuron Express pinoxaden Axial XL 1 MCPA MCPA 4 AXIAL STAR trifloxysulfuron Envoke fluroxypyr Starane 4 thifensulfuron Harmony 2 PANOFLEX triflusulfuron UpBeet rimsulfuron Resolve 2 tribenuron Express 2 BASIS BLEND cloransulam FirstRate thifensulfuron Harmony 2 thifensulfuron Harmony 2 PERMIT PLUS florasulam component of Orion as the SOA. desmedipham Betenex 5 halosulfuron Permit 2 BETAMIX Triazolopyrimidine flumetsulam Python, Accolade phenmedipham ––––– 5 s-metolachlor Dual Magnum 15 PREFIX penoxsulam Grasp BICEP II MAGNUM s-metolachlor Dual II Magnum 15 fomesafen Reflex 14 pyroxsulam PowerFlex HL (Bicep Lite II Magnum) atrazine AAtrex 5 rimsulfuron Resolve 2 PREQUEL EPSP SYNTHASE INHIBITOR s-metolachlor Dual Magnum 15 isoxaflutole Balance 27 Roundup, Touchdown, BOUNDARY (5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate- Organophosphorus glyphosate metribuzin Metribuzin 5 carfentrazone Aim 14 9 14 several PRIORITY 3-phosphate) fomesafen Flexstar 14 halosulfuron Permit 2 BRAKE F2 fluridone Sonar 12 desmedipham Betenex 5 acetochlor 15 PROGRESS phenmedipham 5 GROWTH REGULATORS BREAKFREE NXT ATZ Breakfree NXT ––––– (Breakfree NXT Lite) atrazine AAtrex 5 ethofumesate Nortron 16 Arylpicolinate halauxifen component of Quelex* s-metolachlor Dual Magnum 15 dicamba Clarity 4 Benzoic acid dicamba Banvel, Clarity, DiFlexx*, others The right half of the chart lists specifi c herbicides BROADAXE PULSAR sulfentrazone Spartan 14 fluroxypyr Starane 4 clopyralid Stinger carfentrazone Aim 14 halauzifen ––––– 4 T1R1 AUXIN RECEPTORS fluroxypyr Starane BROADHEAD QUELEX* 4 8 Carboxylic acid quinclorac Facet 4 florasulam ––––– 2 (synthetic auxins) triclopyr Grandstand bromoxynil Buctril 6 triasulfuron Amber 2 quinclorac Facet, Paramount BRONATE RAVE MCPA MCPA 4 dicamba Clarity 4 2,4-D 2,4-D, others or premixes by their sites of action (SOA). Phenoxy alachlor Micro-Tech 15 flucarbazone Everest 2 MCPA MCPA, others BULLET RAZE atrazine AAtrex 5 fluroxypyr Starane 4 19 AUXIN TRANSPORT INHIBITOR 0 Semicarbazone diflufenzopyr component of Status mesotrione Callisto 27 rimsulfuron Resolve 2 CALLISTO GT REALM Q glyphosate glyphosate 9 mesotrione Callisto 27 mesotrione Callisto 27 cyhalofop Clincher 1 PHOTOSYNTHESIS INHIBITORS CALLISTO XTRA REBELEX atrazine AAtrex 5 penoxsulam Grasp 2 desmedipham Betenex Phenylcarbamate chlorimuron Classic 2 rimsulfuron Resolve 2 phenmedipham component of Betamix CANOPY REQUIRE Q metribuzin Metribuzin 5 dicamba Clarity 4 atrazine AAtrex, others chlorimuron Classic 2 rimsulfuron Resolve 2 PHOTOSYSTEM II INHIBITORS Triazine prometryn Caparol CANOPY EX RESOLVE Q 5 26 tribenuron Express 2 thifensulfuron Harmony 2 (different binding than 6 & 7) simazine Princep thiencarbazone Varro 2 bentazon Basagran 6 Premixes on this chart are listed by the most common hexazinone Velpar CAPRENO REZULT Triazinone tembotrione Laudis 27 sethoxydim Poast 1 metribuzin Metribuzin, others MCPA MCPA 4 propoxycarbazone Olympus 2 Uracil terbacil Sinbar RIMFIRE MAX CARNIVORE clopyralid Stinger 4 mesosulfuron Osprey 2 PHOTOSYSTEM II INHIBITORS Benzothiadiazole bentazon Basagran, others 6 1 bromoxynil Buctril 6 s-metolachlor Dual Magnum 15 (different binding than 5 & 7) Nitrile bromoxynil Buctril, others SEQUENCE s-metolachlor Dual II Magnum 15 glyphosate glyphosate 9 Amide propanil SuperWham CINCH ATZ brand names. If you use a generic brand, you will (Cinch ATZ Lite) atrazine AAtrex 5 atrazine AAtrex 5 PHOTOSYSTEM II INHIBITORS diuron Direx, Karmex SHOTGUN 7 9 quinclorac Facet 4 2,4-D 2,4-D 4 (different binding than 5 & 6) Urea fluometuron Cotoran CLEARPATH imazethapyr Newpath 2 mesotrione Callisto 27 linuron Lorox, Linex SOLSTICE COLT + SALVO 2,4-D 2,4-D 4 fluthiacet Cadet 14 (Trump Card) fluroxypyr Starane 4 sulfentrazone Spartan 14 NITROGEN METABOLISM INHIBITOR SONIC 4 2 need to look up the common brand equivalent or the MCPA MCPA cloransulam FirstRate GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE COLT + SWORD 10 1 Organophosphorus glufosinate Liberty fluroxypyr Starane 4 sulfentrazone Spartan 14 INHIBITOR SPARTAN CHARGE thiencarbazone Varro 2 carfentrazone Aim 14 CORVUS isoxaflutole Balance Flexx 27 prosulfuron Peak 2 PIGMENT INHIBITORS SPIRIT clopyralid Stinger 4 primisulfuron Beacon 2 PHYTOENE DESATURASE CURTAIL 12 1 none recognized fluridone Sonar 2,4-D 2,4-D 4 clopyralid Stinger 4 active ingredients. (PDS) INHIBITOR STANZA clopyralid Stinger 4 flumetsulam Python 2 DOXP SYNTHASE INHIBITOR CURTAIL M 13 1 Isoxazolidinone clomazone Command MCPA MCPA 4 florasulam ––––– 2 (1-DEOXY-D-XYULOSE 5-PHOSPHATE) STARANE FLEX acetochlor Degree 15 fluroxypyr Starane 4 Isoxazole isoxaflutole Balance Flexx DEGREE XTRA atrazine AAtrex 5 fluroxypyr Starane 4 Pyrazole pyrasulfotole component of Huskie STARANE NXT 2,4-D 2,4-D 4 bromoxynil Buctril 6 Pyrazolone topramezone Armezon,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D
    Weed Science 2010 58:351–354 Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D. Velini, Maria L. B. Trindade, Luis Rodrigo M. Barberis, and Stephen O. Duke* As all herbicides act on pathways or processes crucial to plants, in an inhibitory or stimulatory way, low doses of any herbicide might be used to beneficially modulate plant growth, development, or composition. Glyphosate, the most used herbicide in the world, is widely applied at low rates to ripen sugarcane. Low rates of glyphosate also can stimulate plant growth (this effect is called hormesis). When applied at recommended rates for weed control, glyphosate can inhibit rust diseases in glyphosate-resistant wheat and soybean. Fluridone blocks carotenoid biosynthesis by inhibition of phytoene desaturase and is effective in reducing the production of abscisic acid in drought-stressed plants. Among the acetolactate synthase inhibitors, sulfometuron-methyl is widely used to ripen sugarcane and imidazolinones can be used to suppress turf species growth. The application of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors can trigger plant defenses against pathogens. Glufosinate, a glutamine synthetase inhibitor, is also known to improve the control of plant diseases. Auxin agonists (i.e., dicamba and 2,4-D) are effective, low-cost plant growth regulators. Currently, auxin agonists are still used in tissue cultures to induce somatic embryogenesis and to control fruit ripening, to reduce drop of fruits, to enlarge fruit size, or to extend the harvest period in citrus orchards. At low doses, triazine herbicides stimulate growth through beneficial effects on nitrogen metabolism and through auxin-like effects. Thus, sublethal doses of several herbicides have applications other than weed control.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Target-Site Mutations Conferring Herbicide Resistance
    plants Review Target-Site Mutations Conferring Herbicide Resistance Brent P. Murphy and Patrick J. Tranel * Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-217-333-1531 Received: 4 September 2019; Accepted: 26 September 2019; Published: 28 September 2019 Abstract: Mutations conferring evolved herbicide resistance in weeds are known in nine different herbicide sites of action. This review summarizes recently reported resistance-conferring mutations for each of these nine target sites. One emerging trend is an increase in reports of multiple mutations, including multiple amino acid changes at the glyphosate target site, as well as mutations involving two nucleotide changes at a single amino acid codon. Standard reference sequences are suggested for target sites for which standards do not already exist. We also discuss experimental approaches for investigating cross-resistance patterns and for investigating fitness costs of specific target-site mutations. Keywords: D1 protein; acetolactate synthase; tubulin; ACCase; EPSPS; phytoene desaturase; PPO; glutamine synthetase; auxin 1. Introduction Herbicide-resistance mechanisms broadly fall under two categories: target-site mechanisms and non-target-site mechanisms [1,2]. The former involves a change to the molecular target of the herbicide (usually an enzyme) that decreases its affinity for the herbicide. Although much less common, target-site resistance can also occur via increased expression of the target, which results in more herbicide required to achieve a lethal effect [3,4]. Non-target-site resistance encompasses any mechanism that reduces the amount of herbicide that reaches the target site, or that ameliorates the effect of the herbicide despite its inhibition of the target site.
    [Show full text]
  • RR Program's RCL Spreadsheet Update
    RR Program’s RCL Spreadsheet Update March 2017 RR Program RCL Spreadsheet Update DNR-RR-052e The Wisconsin DNR Remediation and Redevelopment Program (RR) has updated the numerical soil standards in the August 2015 DNR-RR- 052b RR spreadsheet of residual contaminant levels (RCLs). The RCLs were determined using the U.S. EPA RSL web- calculator by accepting EPA exposure defaults, with the exception of using Chicago, IL, for the climatic zone. This documentThe U.S. provides EPA updateda summary its Regionalof changes Screening to the direct-contact Level (RSL) RCLs website (DC-RCLs) in June that2015. are To now reflect in the that March 2017 spreadsheet.update, the The Wisconsin last page ofDNR this updated document the has numerical the EPA exposuresoil standards, parameter or residual values usedcontaminant in the RCL levels calculations. (RCLs), in the Remediation and Redevelopment program’s spreadsheet of RCLs. This document The providesU.S. EPA a RSL summary web-calculator of the updates has been incorporated recently updated in the Julyso that 2015 the spreadsheet.most up-to-date There toxicity were values no changes for chemi - cals madewere certainlyto the groundwater used in the RCLs,RCL calculations. but there are However, many changes it is important in the industrial to note that and the non-industrial web-calculator direct is only a subpartcontact of the (DC) full RCLsEPA RSL worksheets. webpage, Tables and that 1 andthe other 2 of thissubparts document that will summarize have important the DC-RCL explanatory changes text, generic tablesfrom and the references previous have spreadsheet yet to be (Januaryupdated.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, Metolachlor + Metribuzin EC,04/15
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA Reg. Number: Date of Issuance: Office of Pesticide Programs Registration Division (7505P) 42750-360 4/15/20 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: X Registration Reregistration Conditional (under FIFRA, as amended) Name of Pesticide Product: METOLACHLOR + METRIBUZIN EC Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): Albaugh, LLC P.O. Box 2127 Valdosta, GA 31604-2127 Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Registration Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereby registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. This product is conditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(7)(A). You must comply with the following conditions: 1. Submit and/or cite all data required for registration/reregistration/registration review of your product under FIFRA when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Herbicides to Control Glyphsoate-Resistant Canola Volunteers
    AGRONOMY SCIENCES RESEARCHRESEARCH UPDAUPDATETE Corn Herbicides to Control Glyphosate-Resistant Canola Volunteers 2013 Background Table 1. Herbicide treatments. • With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant corn in Western Treatment Application Rate/Acre Canada, glyphosate-resistant canola volunteers have become a major weed concern to corn producers in the region. 1 Gly Only (Check) 1 L/acre (360g ae) • The Pest Management Regulatory Agency now allows 2 Gly + Dicamba 1 L/acre + 0.243 L/acre herbicides to be tank-mixed if they have individual registrations 3 Gly + 2,4-D 1 L/acre + 0.4 L/acre (600g/L) on the crop and have a common application timing. 4 Gly + MCPA Amine 1 L/acre + 0.45L/acre • Several herbicide options are available to control glyphosate 5 Gly + Bromoxynil 1 L/acre + 0.48 L/acre tolerant canola volunteers in corn; however, some herbicides may have undesirable effects on corn. Gly / Bromoxynil 6 1 L/acre + 0.48 L/acre (Split Application*) Objectives * Glyphosate and bromoxynil applied separately at V3 stage. • Assess crop injury and yield effects of various herbicides tank- mixed with glyphosate to control glyphosate-resistant canola • Herbicide injury scores were recorded at: volunteers in glyphosate-resistant corn. • 3-5 days after treatment • 7-10 days after treatment • Identify the most suitable post-emergence strategy for • 21-24 days after treatment managing glyphosate-resistant canola volunteers in glyphosate-resistant corn. • Other recorded observations include: • Brittle snap counts Study Description • Yield (bu/acre) & moisture (%) • Test weight (lbs/bu) • The study compared the crop response of four industry leading hybrids (Pioneer® brand and competitive) with five different Results herbicide treatments (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • Diquat Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 11-2005 Diquat Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report Bureau of Land Management Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Life Sciences Commons, and the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Bureau of Land Management, "Diquat Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report" (2005). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 107. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/107 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bureau of Land Management Reno, Nevada Diquat Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report November 2005 Bureau of Land Management Contract No. NAD010156 ENSR Document Number 09090-020-650 Executive Summary The United States Department of the Interior (USDI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing a program to treat vegetation on up to six million acres of public lands annually in 17 western states in the continental United States (US) and Alaska. As part of this program, the BLM is proposing the use of ten herbicide active ingredients (a.i.) to control invasive plants and noxious weeds on approximately one million of the 6 million acres proposed for treatment. The BLM and its contractor, ENSR, are preparing a Vegetation Treatments Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate this and other proposed vegetation treatment methods and alternatives on lands managed by the BLM in the western continental US and Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Nozzle Selection and Adjuvant Impact on the Efficacy of Glyphosate And
    agronomy Article Nozzle Selection and Adjuvant Impact on the Efficacy of Glyphosate and PPO-Inhibiting Herbicide Tank-Mixtures Jesaelen G. Moraes 1,* , Thomas R. Butts 1 , Vitor M. Anunciato 2 , Joe D. Luck 3 , Wesley C. Hoffmann 4, Ulisses R. Antuniassi 5 and Greg R. Kruger 1 1 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101, USA; [email protected] (T.R.B.); [email protected] (G.R.K.) 2 Department of Plant Protection, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP 18618687, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Department of Biological System Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101, USA; [email protected] 4 USDA-ARS Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Rural Engineering, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP 18618687, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-219-1674 Abstract: PPO-inhibiting herbicides in combination with glyphosate for postemergence applications is a common approach to manage glyphosate- and ALS-inhibitor-resistant weeds. PPO-inhibitors can reduce glyphosate translocation when applied in tank-mixtures, but adjuvants may be used to overcome this effect. Additionally, optimal droplet size may be affected by tank-mixtures of different Citation: Moraes, J.G.; Butts, T.R.; herbicides and it can be crucial to herbicide efficacy. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted M. Anunciato, V.; Luck, J.D.; to investigate the impact of nozzle selection and adjuvants on weed control and interactions when Hoffmann, W.C.; Antuniassi, U.R.; applying PPO-inhibitors (fomesafen or lactofen) alone or in tank-mixture with glyphosate to five Kruger, G.R.
    [Show full text]