A Cinematic Nation: Representation, Regionalism, and the National Question in Postwar Italy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Cinematic Nation: Representation, Regionalism, and the National Question in Postwar Italy By ©2009 Brent Jeffrey Piepergerdes Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. James R. Shortridge ____________________________ Chairperson Committee Members Garth A. Myers ____________________________ J. Christopher Brown ____________________________ Terry A. Slocum ____________________________ Janice M. Kozma ____________________________ Date Defended: December 04, 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Brent Jeffrey Piepergerdes certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: A Cinematic Nation: Representation, Regionalism, and the National Question in Postwar Italy James R. Shortridge ____________________________ Chairperson Committee Members Garth A. Myers ____________________________ J. Christopher Brown ____________________________ Terry A. Slocum ____________________________ Janice M. Kozma ____________________________ Date Approved: December 11, 2009 i Table of Contents List of Figures iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction: Imagined Italies—Cinema, Nation, Narration 1 1 The Southern Question and the Roots of Modern Italian Regionalism 20 2 Film Neorealism and the Postwar Italian Condition 52 3 The Periphery of Modernity: An Overview of Cinema and the South during the 83 Economic Miracle 4 To Laugh or Cry?: Commedia all’italiana and the Critique of Cultural Change 101 5 Interrogating the Hegemony of the Italian Economic Miracle 132 6 Popular Cinema and the Deconstruction of the Myths of Modernization 176 7 Boundaries: New Regionalisms and the Limits of the Cinematic Nation 210 Notes 232 Appendix 254 Filmography 259 Bibliography 264 ii List of Figures I.1. (Map) The traditional border between the North and the Mezzogiorno. 4 1.1. (Map) The Unification of Italy, 1815-1870. William Shepherd. Historical Atlas. 22 New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911. 2.1. Scipione l’africano. Carmine Gallone. ENIC, 1937. 64 2.2. Ladri di biciclette. Vittorio De Sica. PDS-ENIC, 1948. 66 2.3. Ladri di biciclette. Vittorio De Sica. PDS-ENIC, 1948. 68 2.4. Sciuscià. Vittorio De Sica. Societa Cooperativa Alfa Cinematografia, 1946. 70 2.5. La terra trema. Luchino Visconti. Universalia, 1948. 76 2.6. La terra trema. Luchino Visconti. Universalia, 1948. 78 2.7. La terra trema. Luchino Visconti. Universalia, 1948. 80 4.1. Mafioso. Alberto Lattuada. CCC /Dino de Laurentiis, 1962. 111 4.2. Mafioso. Alberto Lattuada. CCC /Dino de Laurentiis, 1962. 115 4.3. Divorzio all’italiana. Pietro Germi. Lux /Galatea /Vides, 1961. 121 4.4. Divorzio all’italiana. Pietro Germi. Lux /Galatea /Vides, 1961. 123 4.5. Sedotta e abbandonata. Pietro Germi. CCF /Ultra Film /Vides, 1964. 126 4.6. Il sorpasso. Dino Risi. Incei /Fair /Sancro Film, 1962. 129 5.1. Rocco e i suoi fratelli. Luchino Visconti. Titanus /Les Film Marceau, 1960. 148 5.2. Rocco e i suoi fratelli. Luchino Visconti. Titanus /Les Film Marceau, 1960. 152 5.3. Rocco e i suoi fratelli. Luchino Visconti. Titanus /Les Film Marceau, 1960. 152 5.4. Rocco e i suoi fratelli. Luchino Visconti. Titanus /Les Film Marceau, 1960. 154 5.5. Accattone. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Cino del Duca /Arco Film, 1961. 162 5.6. Accattone. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Cino del Duca /Arco Film, 1961. 162 5.7. Comizi d’amore. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Arco Film, 1965. 166 5.8. Comizi d’amore. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Arco Film, 1965. 169 5.9. Comizi d’amore. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Arco Film, 1965. 174 6.1. Le fatiche di Ercole. Pietro Francisci. Galatea Film /O.S.C.A.R. /Urania Film, 182 1957. 6.2. Banditi a Orgosolo. Vittorio De Seta. Titanus, 1960. 189 6.3. Salvatore Giuliano. Francesco Rosi. Galatea Film /Lux /Vides Cinematografica, 191 1962. 6.4. C’era una volta il West. Sergio Leone. Rafran /Finanzia /San Marco /Paramount 199 Pictures, 1968. 6.5. Giù la testa. Sergio Leone. EIA /Rafran /San Miura, 1971. 206 7.1. (Map) The Three Italies. 217 7.2. Uccellacci e uccellini. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Arco Film, 1966. 222 7.3. Uccellacci e uccellini. Pier Paolo Pasolini. Arco Film, 1966. 222 iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my dissertation committee members for their immeasurable support and guidance throughout this project. Garth Myers inspired my interest in social theory and provided an exceptional example of how to apply abstract ideas in an approachable and relevant manner. Also, he always found a spare moment to talk about two of our shared passions—soccer and music. Chris Brown conveyed the importance of being excited by my research and of having confidence in communicating a point of view. His scholarship on the social construction of scale was of great inspiration. Jan Kozma taught me so much about the richness and complexity of Italian history and culture. My greatest debt to her comes from reminding me how much more I have to learn. Barbara Shortridge introduced me to studies of media geography. I appreciate her careful and thorough critique and her suggestions for making this dissertation both academic and popular. Terry Slocum deserves thanks for sacrificing his time on sabbatical to assist in finalizing this project. His diligent and compassionate service as chair has truly enriched the department. My deepest gratitude goes to my advisor, Pete Shortridge, for his unwavering patience and encouragement. I can say with all sincerity that I would not have made it this far without his support, both academically and personally. As much as I am grateful for his professional mentorship, it is his friendship that I treasure the most. In addition, I would like to thank the Department of Geography at the University of Kansas for its financial support and intellectual stimulation over the years. I owe Beverly Koerner and Leatrice Smith special thanks for their time and expertise concerning all bureaucratic matters. iv Introduction: Imagined Italies—Cinema, Nation, Narration On a map, it seems so practical, so commonsensical. A seven-hundred mile long peninsula bound on its lone continental side by Europe’s tallest mountain range should yield the formation of a “natural” nation. Yet it has not. Italy today in many ways still remains how Klemens von Metternich imagined it in 1847: “only a geographical expression.”1 A common misconception is that Italy has been a cohesive political and cultural state since the Renaissance, or even since the Roman Empire. This is partly because the legacies of these periods have been co-opted by Western Civilization as a whole. Lost is the fact that the Italian North and South had drastically different experiences during both these periods, and that from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries, the entire peninsula was controlled by multiple foreign powers. Unified Italy is less than one hundred and fifty years old and, possibly more astonishing, the modern democratic republic formed only in 1948—a year after India. Since unification, Italian nationalism has struggled with an inbetweenness of identity. Although economic conditions (the seventh largest GDP in the world) render it an international power, Italy is considered a “second-tier” state in the European Union (EU) because of an inefficient and corrupt political system and relatively high unemployment rate. According to the EU, the Italian South is also one of the most prominent “problem regions” in all of Europe. Along with its Latin and Mediterranean heritage, the country’s proximity to Africa underscores imaginations of it as a land caught between the two continents. Moreover, Italians are also locked in a temporal limbo between the resonance of their ancient history and the ephemerality of the present. 1 Perhaps it should be no surprise then, that Italians have internalized their inbetweenness into a longstanding dualism between a “progressive” North and a “backward” South. In fact, the country has been so caught between the cultural and political remnants from the past and the realignments fostered by contemporary processes of globalization that nationalism has loomed like a carrot on a stick: always in sight, but never in reach. A Tale of Two Italies Although cultural differences have existed for centuries between a cosmopolitan, European-oriented North and a familial, localistic South, Italy at the time of its unification in 1861 was more economically homogeneous than it is today. The economy nearly everywhere was dominated by primary-sector activities at that time. Notably, fifty-two percent of the northern population was still involved in agriculture as recently as 1940, with only twenty-two percent in industry, and only twenty-six percent in tertiary activities.2 Although northern Italy on the eve of World War II was certainly more urbanized, industrialized, and connected to the rest of Europe than the entirety of the South (with the exceptions of Rome and Naples), the national economy still revolved around small-scale agriculture. The biggest contrast between regional economies at that time was small-to-medium-scale commercial agriculture in the North versus subsistence agriculture in the South. This functionality had great implications for growth potential, particularly in the ensuing postwar years.3 The contemporary landscape of a divided Italy became cemented after 1945 by rapid industrialization of the North. This region contained the majority of the country’s meager natural resources plus ninety-five percent of the rail network, an established credit system dating back to the Medici