Michigan Entomologist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed. -
De Heterocera Van Sumatra — Iv —
00 ZOOLOG1SCHE MEDEDEELINGEN — DEEL X. VIII. — DE HETEROCERA VAN SUMATRA — IV —. DOOR R. VAN EECKE. (MET 14 TEXTFIGUREN EN 1 GEKLEURDE PLAAT). Gen. Thumata Walk. Thumata, Walk., List. Lep. Ins. Br. Mus. XXXV, p. 1900, (1866). Hamps., Cat. Lep. Phal. II, p. 420, (1900). Seitz, Grossschm. d. Erde X, p. 159, (1914). Type: Th. fuscescens Walk. Geogr. verspr.: W. Afrika, Madagascar, Br. Indie, Assam, Ceylon, Borneo, Java, Australie. Zuiger gereduceerd, klein; palpen vooruitstekend, doch niet over het voorhoofd reikend; dat met haar begroeid is; antennen van het cT kort dubbel gekamd en wat verdikt aan de toppen; tibien middelmatig ge- spoord; abdomen wollig. Voorvleugel kort en breed; ader 2 vanaf het midden der eel; 3 vanaf voor den celhoek; 4 en 5 vanaf dien hoek; 6 vanaf onder den bovenhoek; 7, 8 en 9 gesteeld; 10 vrij; 11 met 12 samensmeltend. Aehtervleugelader 2 vanaf over het midden der eel; 3 en 4 gesteeld; 5 vanaf ongeveer het midden der discocellularis; 6 en 7 lang gesteeld; 8 vanaf bij het celeinde. Thumata fuscescens Walk. Thumata fuscescens, Walk., List. Lep. Ins. Br. Mus. XXXV, p. 1901, (1866). Hamps., 111. Typ. Sp. Br. Mus. IX, p. 86; pi. 158, f. 18, (1893). Cat. Lep. Phal. II, p. 421, f. 332, (1900). Seitz, Grossschm. d. Erde X, p. 159; pi. 17c, (1914). Deze soort werd tot nog toe niet op Sumatra gevonden, doch zal daar ongetwijfeld wel voorkomen. Grijs-bruin; kop, thorax, voorvleugelbasis en eenige vlekken langs de costa donker bruin; sporen van een gezaagde, buitenwaarts gebogen mediale; een duidelijke vlek op de discocellularis; sporen van een postmediale lijn, gevolgd door eene serie zwarte stippen. -
Max Gaede - Wikipedia
Max Gaede - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gaede From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Max Gaede (29 November 1871 – 27 October 1946),[2] Max Gaede was a German engineer and entomologist[3] of international fame who described several hundred of new Born 29 November 1871 species of lepidoptera, mainly African Noctuidae. Berlin Died 27 October 1946 (aged 74) He became a member of the Internationaler Berlin Entomologischer Verein[4] in 1899 and Many lepidoptera species had been named after Max Gaede. Some of them Residence Berlin-Charlottenburg, Bergedorf[1] are: Citizenship German Nationality German Zekelita gaedei Lödl, 1999[5] Decachorda gaedei Dufrane 1953[6] Fields Lepidoptera, entomology, Astyloneura gaedei Alberti, 1957[7] Lepidopterology Eutelia gaedei Hacker & Fibiger, 2006[8] Institutions Berlin Zamarada gaedei Fletcher, 1974[9] Hypocala gaedei Berio, 1955[10] Ozarba gaedei Berio, 1940[11] Athetis gaedei Berio, 1955[12] Callyna gaedei Hacker & Fibiger, 2006[13] and others Some of the publications of Max Gaede are: Gaede, M., 1914, Internationale entomologische Zeitschrift 8 : 127, fig. Gaede, M., 1915, Internationale entomologische Zeitschrift 9 : 73. Gaede, M., 1915. Neue afrikanische Heteroceren des Berliner Zoologischen Museums. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris 29 : 101–122. (https://archive.org/stream /deutscheentomolo29141915ento#page/101/mode/1up) Gaede, M., 1915. Lepidoptera von Herrn P.Range im Nama-Land. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift Iris 29 : 144–148. (https://archive.org/stream/deutscheentomolo29141915ento#page /144/mode/1up) Gaede, M., 1916, Stettiner entomologische Zeitung 77: p. 125, pl. Gaede, Max, 1916, Die äthiopischen Thyrididen nach dem Material des Berliner zoologischen Museums.-Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin. 28 cm. 8. -
The Genus Danielithosia Dubatolov & Kishida, 2012
Zootaxa 3964 (4): 494–497 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3964.4.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:179EF87B-2F0A-4A49-9ABE-5994E9B9BF91 The genus Danielithosia Dubatolov & Kishida, 2012 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) in Cambodia, with description of one new species ULZIIJARGAL BAYARSAIKHAN 1, VLADIMIR V. DUBATOLOV2 & YANG-SEOP BAE1, 3 1Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Songdo-dong, Incheon, 406-772, South Korea. E-mail. [email protected] 2Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, SB RAS, Frunze street 11, Novosibirsk 91, RU-630091 Russia. 3Corresponding author Although the arctiine fauna of Cambodia remains poorly known, considerable progress has been made over the last seven years (Bucsek, 2012; Cerny & Pinratana, 2009; Bae et al., 2012; Dubatolov, 2012, 2013; Dubatolov et al., 2012, 2013). The genus Danielithosia (Arctiinae) was established by Dubatolov and Kishida (2012), with the type species Tigrioides aureolata Daniel, 1954 from Fujian, Sichuan, and Zhejiang, China. To date, this genus comprises 11 species in the world, most of which are distributed in the Palaearctic and Oriental Regions (Dubatolov, 2013). The genus Danielithosia can be recognized by the following characters: sacculus with a characteristic broadening subapically; juxta long, with a long sclerotized bifurcated process apically (Dubatolov et al., 2012). In Cambodia, only one species, D. hoenei Dubatolov, 2013, has been reported (Dubatolov, 2013), and we here describe one new species from Cambodia. Terminology in this paper follows Dubatolov et al. -
2003 Contents
THE NEWSJOURNAL OF THE TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION VOLUME 8, NUMBER 2 JANUARY 2003 Contents Vol. 8, No. 2 Jan. 2003 Mission Statement The Toronto Entomologists’ Association (TEA) is a non-profit educational and scientific organization formed to promote Announcements ...................................................................................................................... 21 interest in insects, to encourage co-operation Upcoming Meetings ............................................................................................................... 22 among amateur and professional Recent News submitted by Don Davis ................................................................................... 24 entomologists, to educate and inform non- entomologists about insects, entomology and Meeting Reports ..................................................................................................................... 25 related fields, to aid in the preservation of Rediscovery of the Lake Huron Locust in Ontario by Steve Marshall .............................. 26 insects and their habitats and to issue publications in support of these objectives. The Bookworm ....................................................................................................................... 27 Executive Officers: Weaving an Ant's Tail by Lydia Attard ................................................................................ 28 President Nancy van der Poorten 2002 Presqu'ile Butterfly Blitz by Philip Careless ............................................................. -
CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties. -
The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?
The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle. -
Catalogue of Eastern and Australian Lepidoptera Heterocera in The
XCATALOGUE OF EASTERN AND AUSTRALIAN LEPIDOPTERA HETEROCERA /N THE COLLECTION OF THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY MUSEUM COLONEL C. SWINHOE F.L.S., F.Z.S., F.E.S. PART I SPHINGES AND BOMB WITH EIGHT PLAJOES 0;cfor5 AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1892 PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRKSS EY HORACE HART, PRINT .!< TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE At the request of Professor Westwood, and under the orders and sanction of the Delegates of the Press, this work is being produced as a students' handbook to all the Eastern Moths in the Oxford University Museum, including chiefly the Walkerian types of the moths collected by Wal- lace in the Malay Archipelago, which for many years have been lost sight of and forgotten for want of a catalogue of reference. The Oxford University Museum collection of moths is very largely a collection of the types of Hope, Saunders, Walker, and Moore, many of the type specimens being unique and of great scientific value. All Walker's types mentioned in his Catalogue of Hetero- cerous Lepidoptera in the British Museum as ' in coll. Saun- ders ' should be in the Oxford Museum, as also the types of all the species therein mentioned by him as described in Trans. Ent. Soc, Lond., 3rd sen vol. i. The types of all the species mentioned in Walker's cata- logue which have a given locality preceding the lettered localties showing that they are in the British Museum should also be in the Oxford Museum. In so far as this work has proceeded this has been proved to be the case by the correct- vi PREFACE. -
Diel Flight Periodicity and the Evolution of Auditory Defences in the Macrolepidoptera
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2001, 62, 349–368 doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1753, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Diel flight periodicity and the evolution of auditory defences in the Macrolepidoptera JAMES H. FULLARD & NADIA NAPOLEONE Department of Zoology, Erindale College, University of Toronto (Received 18 February 2000; initial acceptance 3 May 2000; final acceptance 24 January 2001; MS. number: A8729R) We measured the 24-h flight activity patterns of 84 species of Nearctic Lepidoptera representing 12 ultrasound-earless and seven ultrasound-eared families to examine the evolution of the diel flight periodicities (DFPs) and auditory defences of these insects. Most species tested showed mixed DFPs (flight during day and night hours) with few being exclusively nocturnal. With the exception of one geometrid moth and one arctiid moth, only the butterflies (Papilionoidea+Hesperioidea) were exclusively diurnal, supporting the hypothesis that this trait has resulted from their lack of ultrasound-sensitive ears, structures that in most other Macrolepidoptera provide auditory defence against aerially foraging, insectivorous bats. Eared species showed the highest tendency to fly during both day and night, a trait we suggest results from their possession of both visual and auditory defences. Earless moths were almost exclusively nocturnal and may be constrained to the night because of their size and tendency for ground-hugging flight, which may provide protection against bats, but would be liabilities against diurnal, visually hunting predators. Ultrasound sensitivity not only appears to protect eared moths from aerial predators (bats) but also protects them from terrestrial predators by allowing the moths to remain in the air during the night, and, we suggest, is responsible for the success of this group of Macrolepidoptera. -
Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups
Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System.......................................................... -
A Vascular Flora Inventory
A Vascular Flora Inventory Ottawa Sands Ottawa County Parks, Michigan September 2020 Prepared by William Martinus & Associates Financial assistance for this project was provided, in part, by the Coastal Management Program, Water Resources Division, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, under the National Coastal Zone Management program, through a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the Ottawa County Parks & Recreation Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Purpose 3 II. Overview 3 III. Plant Communities 4 IV. Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species 5 V. Species Lists 7 VI. References 21 2 I. Introduction and Purpose Ottawa Sands, Ottawa County Parks, consists of 345 acres including an 80-acre inland lake, natural forests, coastal dunes, intermittent wetlands, inundated shrub swamp, and riparian marsh, shrub, and swamp communities. The eleven natural plant communities occurring on the site are listed along with hundreds of associated plant and animal species. - Ottawa Sands is located near the mouth of the Grand River in sections 17, 18 and 20 of Spring Lake Township, Ottawa County, in Western Michigan. - Property includes 5,585 feet of Grand River frontage. - A Floristic Quality Assessment demonstrates that a diverse and extremely high-quality plant component exists at Ottawa Sands. Purpose - To gain an understanding of the vegetative plant communities and flora of western Ottawa County and central west Michigan area. -
1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.