DOCSLIB.ORG

Swale Borough Local Plan: Updated Duty to Cooperate Statement Covering the Period December 2015 – December 2016 1. Introductio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swale Borough Local Plan: Updated Duty to Cooperate Statement Covering the Period December 2015 – December 2016 1. Introductio CD/011b Swale Borough Local Plan: Updated Duty to Cooperate Statement covering the period December 2015 – December 2016 1. Introduction 1.1 Since the submission of the Local Plan for Examination in Public (at April 2015) together with the covering Duty to Cooperate Statement (CD/011), the statement was updated at December 2015 to cover the additional research which was undertaken ahead of the Examination in Public (CD/011a). The Examination in Public (EIP) was paused after the initial hearing in December 2015 and followed by the Inspector’s Interim Findings published in late January and February 2016 (ID/9a-d). 1.2 The Inspector’s Interim Findings (ID/9a-d) followed the first phase of the EIP on the Swale Borough Local Plan. The Inspector noted at ID/9c (paras1-5) that she was satisfied that the preparation of the plan and additional work which would inform any main modifications has been based on co-operation and effective collaboration with the relevant organisations and that the DTC had been met. 1.3 In response to the detail of the Interim Findings, the Council has prepared and consulted on Main Modifications to the Swale Local Plan. These have been the subject of discussion and consultation with key stakeholders and neighbouring districts. However, as described in CD/011, contact with those bodies has continued as they progress their own strategies and plans. 1.4 This report provides a review of issues identified as potential strategic issues for the Borough or stakeholders in CD/011 and updates the situation. The Appendices to this update includes responses and sets out the actions taken and results of any cooperation. 2. Who does Swale Co-operate with? 2.1 Table 4.1 of CD/011 remains valid in this respect, with any additional bodies noted below for relevant topics. Regular liaison arrangements as set out in CD/011 continue. 3. Update on Strategic Issues Housing Need and Development Target Issues 3.1 The Inspector’s Interim Findings ID/9c indicated a new housing target for the Plan period of 776 dwellings per annum and a high degree of confidence that the Council would be able to accommodate this target, whilst maintaining its settlement strategy of two planning areas and should therefore propose main modifications to meet the new target. The Council has therefore done this 1 CD/011b through the Main Modifications document (SBC/PS/101). As a consequence, the Council has not found it necessary to request that any other neighbouring district assist with meeting any portion of the new housing target. Neighbouring district councils, although grappling with challenging housing targets of their own, have not to date needed to approach Swale to meet any of their need to date. This has been borne out in ongoing co-operation with neighbouring districts and the GLA as demonstrated below. 3.2 The Maidstone Local Plan has met its own objectively assessed housing need through the plan within its own administrative area. Swale BC made comments on the publication version of the Maidstone plan at March 2016 (on matters other than housing), which were subsequently resolved through discussion and proposed minor changes to the plan. A statement of Common Ground was also agreed between the two authorities at August 2016 which is at Appendix 1of this report and confirms the mutually agreed position on meeting housing need. The Maidstone Local Plan has been subject to EIP during October / November 2016, and Swale BC has been satisfied to rely upon the Statement of Common Ground in respect of both the Duty to Co- operate generally and upon the matter of meeting housing needs. Maidstone BC has also indicated their satisfaction in response to consultation with Main Modification 42 in respect of the new development targets. 3.3 The Canterbury Local Plan was subject to Inspector’s Interim Findings (as reported in CD/011a) and indicated the Inspector’s satisfaction with the DTC between Canterbury and Swale to date. The Interim Findings did increase the Canterbury housing target to be resolved through Main Modifications. This was proposed to be met within the Canterbury administrative area and consequently did not have any cross boundary issues for the Swale area on this topic. The resumed Canterbury EIP has now taken place and further reporting from that Inspector is awaited. No further cross boundary housing issues with Canterbury are anticipated at this time. 3.4 At the EIP hearings in 2015, the Medway City Council Plan was at too early a stage to establish whether they would need to seek to approach Swale BC under the DTC on housing matters. Since then, Medway CC have consulted on an Issues and Options document. (January 2016) for their plan, which Swale BC responded to (see Appendix 2). A preferred way forward for the Medway Plan has not yet been identified (a major issue continues to be the resolution of strategic site for 5000 dwellings, which has been subject to Secretary of State call in, with a public inquiry anticipated summer 2017). Medway CC have responded to the Main Modifications consultation on the Swale Local Plan have indicated their satisfaction with the new Swale development target in Main Modification 42. A meeting to discuss mutual local plan progress was held 3 August 2016 and led to the Medway note of 2 CD/011b satisfaction with the Swale Proposed Main Modifications as noted. Further updating and liaison meetings between Swale BC and Medway CC continue. 3.5 Ashford Borough Council sought to establish potential cross boundary issues in respect of their new Local Plan to 2030. The Borough Council responded to this (see letter 8 Feb 2016 Appendix 3) to share the latest information on the SHMA findings for the Swale housing market area, establishing the lack of overlap between Swale and Ashford in this respect. Ashford have proceeded to publication stage of their plan (August 2016), and propose to meet all of the objectively assessed housing need within their administrative boundaries (and focused principally at the urban area of Ashford), so no housing or other matters were identified as strategic cross boundary issues between Swale and Ashford. 3.6 Gravesham Borough Council (part of the wider North Kent housing market area) have also responded to the Main Modifications consultation and indicated their satisfaction with the new Swale housing development target at Main Modification 42. 3.7 The Greater London Plan Review is still at a very early stage, with a summit on the way forward on DTC, particularly in respect of how London’s housing need may be met anticipated in December 2016. At officer level information and research is disseminated through the Kent Planning Officers Group Planning Policy Forum, with officer representation at GLA from Kent County Council, Dartford BC / Gravesham BC and Medway CC feeding back to the whole group. At this stage no element of meeting London housing need has been sought in Swale, or indeed anywhere else in Kent. 3.8 The GLA have also responded to the Swale BC consultation on the Main Modifications and have indicated (LP Representation No 888) that they are content with Main Modification 24 and the assessment of the objectively assessed need for this plan period. However, Swale BC in assessing the potential implications of the 2014 based ONS Household Projections on Swale’s objectively assessed housing need (SBC/PS/116), also took the opportunity to corroborate the findings that there was no meaningful change to the Swale OAN, with the GLA’s demographers. Gypsy and Traveller Provision 3.9 In the light of the PPTS (2015) and continuing absence of any adopted DCLG guidance on GTAA’s, the Inspector’s Interim Findings (ID/9d paras 11-14) found the Council’s approach to assessing and meeting Gypsy and Traveller needs sound. The Council continues to meet with other Kent Districts and Kent County Council to monitor this topic and share research and policy approach as necessary. 3 CD/011b 3.10 In preparing the submission version of the Maidstone Local Plan, a small shortfall in identified sites was indicated and Maidstone BC enquired as to whether there were any surplus allocated sites in Swale. Following discussion, Maidstone BC resolved that their modest shortfall could be met through windfall provision within the Maidstone BC area. Transport Infrastructure 3.11 The Council continues to cooperate with the highway authorities and transport providers. Kent Highways advised the EIP in December 2015 that the new objectively assessed need figure was sufficiently close to figures already modelled to be acceptable on the County road network. Following the Inspector’s Interim Findings, there has been ongoing collaboration on the implications of the new housing target and proposed new allocations to meet this. The confirmation of the Council’s settlement strategy and ongoing focus of development at the western end of the Borough, led Highways England to advise that the impact of the new development on the junctions of the County network with the Strategic Road network along the A249 corridor should be tested and any necessary mitigation schemes identified (and this was confirmed in their response to the Main Modifications consultation). Both highway authorities and the Borough Council are continuing to work together and with key developers in the area to this end. A further Statement of Common Ground between the highway authorities and the Council, supported by technical evidence is in hand and will be available for the resumed Local Plan EIP hearings in January 2017. 3.12 The Council has continued to work with the Highways England M2/Junction 5 team in respect of research supporting the improvement scheme for this junction; and consultation on design options is anticipated early in 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kent Design Guide Review: Consultation on Interim Guidance Notes Full List of Consultees Appendix 4
    Appendix 4 Kent Design Guide Review: Consultation on Interim Guidance Notes Full List of Consultees FirstName LastName Company Richard Alderton Ashford Borough Council Sarah Anderton Maidstone Borough Council Mark Aplin Shepway Distrcit Council Judith Ashton Judith Ashton Associates Judith Ashton Judith Ashton Associates David Banfield Barratt Strategic Jeremy Barkway Southern Housing Group Kim Bennett Canterbury City Council Alan Best Swale Borough Council Graham Brown Denne Construction Limited Kevin Burbidge Gravesham Borough Council Hamish Buttle Millwood Designer Homes Ltd Tony Chadwick Gravesham Borough Council Scott Chamberlin Gleeson Homes Simon Cole Ashford Borough Council Peter Court Bovis Homes Ltd Nick Davies Crest Nicholson South East Ltd Mike Dawson Dover District Council Peter Day RICS (c/o Day Montague Youens) Mick Drury Ward Homes Jerry Duncan Partnership & Crime Reduction Alan Dyer Sevenoaks District Council Norman Easterbrook Gravesham Borough Council Mike Ebbs Dover District Council Bob Enderson Medway Council Pete Errington Home Builders Federation Ltd Andy Evans Centex Srategic Land David Evison Evison & Company Colin Fitt Thanet District Council Tim Flisher Dover District Council James Freeman Swale Borough Council Brian Gates Tonbridgte & Malling Borough Council Clive Gilbert Gravesham Borough Council Alan Glover The Architecture Centre Wendy Goddard Kent Energy Centre Ian Grundy Ashford Borough Council Jo Hanslip Redrow Homes Ltd Dave Harris Medway Council Gill Harris Swale Borough Council Martin Hart Pentland
    [Show full text]
  • PCC Notice of Election
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Election of the Police and Crime Commissioner for the Kent Police Area 1. An election is to be held for a Police and Crime Commissioner for the Kent Police Area. 2. Nomination papers can be obtained from the office of the Police Area Returning Officer, Room C1, Dartford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent, DA1 1DR, during the normal office hours or online at www.electoralcommission.org.uk 3. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Police Area Returning Officer at Room C1, Dartford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent, DA1 1DR between 10am and 4pm on any working day after publication of this notice but no later than 4pm on Thursday 8 April 2021 4. If the election is contested the poll will take place on Thursday 6 May 2021 between the hours of 7am and 10pm 5. Applications to register to vote must reach the relevant Electoral Registration Officer by 12 midnight on Monday 19 April 2021. Applications can be made online: https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote. 6. The £5,000 deposit can be paid by legal tender or by means of a banker’s draft from a drawer which carries on business as a banker in the United Kingdom or BACS. 7. Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the relevant Electoral Registration Officer by 5pm on Tuesday 20 April 2021. 8. Applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the relevant Electoral Registration Officer by 5pm on Tuesday 27 April 2021. 9. Applications to vote by emergency proxy at this election must reach the relevant Electoral Registration Officer by 5pm on 6 May 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Annual Meeting of the Council Of
    MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF LUTON HELD AT THE TOWN HALL, LUTON ON TUESDAY 21st JANUARY 2014 AT 6.00 P.M. PRESENT: THE MAYOR - Councillor Roden. THE DEPUTY MAYOR - Councillor Zia COUNCILLORS - Akbar, Ashraf, M. Ayub, N. Ayub, Bailey MBE, Burnett, Campbell, Cato, Chapman, J. Davies, R. J. Davis, Dolling, Farooq, Foord, Franks, Gale, Garrett, Hanif, Hinkley, Hopkins, Hussain, A. Khan, T. Khan, Knight, Lewis, Malcolm, K. Malik, T. Malik, Mead, Moles, O’ Callaghan, Rathore, Riaz, Rivers, Saleem, Sharif, Shaw, Simmons, Skepelhorn, Taylor, Titmuss and Worlding. 1 MINUTES (REF: 1) Resolved: That the Minutes of the meeting of the Council held on 5th November 2013 be taken as read, approved as a correct record and signed by the Mayor. 2 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence from the meeting were received on behalf of Councillors Stewart MBE, Timoney and Whittaker. 3 MEMBERS' CONDUCT (REF: 2.1) The Mayor reminded Members of the need to observe proper conduct, to show respect for each other and to observe her rulings at meetings of the Council. 4 MAYOR’S CHARITY EVENTS (REF: 2.2) The Mayor advised Members of a number of her upcoming Charity events: Page 321 of 323 Luton Town Football Club Dinner in the Eric Morecambe Suite on Friday 24th January 2014 at 7.00 p.m. Lewsey Sport Pavilion Race Night at Lewsey Park, Pastures Way on Friday 7th February 2014 at 7.00 p.m. Hat Fashion Show at the Town Hall on Friday 14th March 2014 at 6.30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Borough Council Freedom of Information Act Request Ref: FOI 7611 Date: 10 December 2018 Request and Response in Respon
    Maidstone Borough Council Freedom of Information Act Request Ref: FOI 7611 Date: 10 December 2018 Request and Response - How much waste is exported from your UK local authority and to where in years 2016-2017? What was the received revenue from waste export in years 2016-2017? - How much has your local authority spent on overall waste management and collecting recyclables in the last 5 years? - What is the collection method for paper and card in the UK? - How much waste did incinerate in 2017? In response to the questions 1,3 and 4, I have attached the Material End Destination Publication. The waste was exported to the following countries: Outside EU Inside EU China Italy Hong Kong Belgium India Netherlands Philipines Germany Vietman Poland Malaysia Indonesia Taiwan In response to question 2, the table below shows the costs for the last 5 years. This includes all overheads and costs for the waste and recycling services. Year £ 2017/18 2,491,236 2016/17 2,225,575 2015/16 2,364,419 2014/15 2,251525 2013/14 2,894,684 Kent Resource Partnership The KRP comprises all 13 Kent councils, working together for the benefit of Kent taxpayers and the wider economy Materials End Destinations Publication 2016/17 This page is intentionally left blank. 2 Contents Notes 4 Foreword 5 Kent Resource Partnership 6-15 Ashford Borough Council 16-17 Canterbury City Council 18-19 Dartford Borough Council 20-21 Dover District Council 22-23 Gravesham Borough Council 24-25 Maidstone Borough Council 26-27 Sevenoaks District Council 28-29 Shepway District Council 30-31 Swale Borough Council 32-33 Thanet District Council 34-35 Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council 36-37 Tunbridge Wells Borough Council 38-39 5 Year Picture: Reflecting on Progress – 2012/13 to 2016/17 40 - 52 3 Published by the Kent Resource Partnership on behalf of the following KRP constituent councils:- Ashford BC, Canterbury CC, Dartford BC, Dover DC, Gravesham BC, Kent CC, Maidstone BC, Sevenoaks DC, Shepway DC, Swale BC, Thanet DC, Tonbridge & Malling BC and Tunbridge Wells BC.
    [Show full text]
  • ICS Regional Locality Pack Kent&Medway
    Kent and Medway ICS NHS England and NHS Improvement Kent and Medway: Integrated care system & CCG Kent and Medway Population size Patient Population 1,917,087 Local Authorities 1 upper tier, 1 unitary, 12 districts & boroughs Acute Trusts 4 Mental health 2 Trusts Community 3 Trusts CCG 1 ICPs 4 PCNs 42 General Practices 198 Kent and Medway’s Integrated Care Partnerships and Primary Care Networks Kent and Medway Sites Our ICS Vision and purpose We will work together to make health and wellbeing better than any partner can do alone This means we will: 1. Give children the best start in life and work to make sure they are not disadvantaged by where they live or their background, and are free from fear or discrimination 2. Help the most vulnerable and disadvantaged in society to improve their physical and mental health; with a focus on the social determinants of health and preventing people becoming ill in the first place 3. Help people to manage their own health and wellbeing and be proactive partners in their care so they can live happy, independent and fulfilling lives; adding years to life and life to years 4. Support people with multiple health conditions to be part of a team with health and care professionals working compassionately to improve their health and wellbeing 5. Ensure that when people need hospital services, most are available from people’s nearest hospital; whilst providing centres of excellence for specialist care where that improves quality, safety and sustainability 6. Make Kent and Medway a great place for our colleagues to live, work and learn 5 | Our ICS priorities and principles In Kent and Medway we are working in partnership to deliver our vision and our nine ICS strategic priorities .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Draft Version 1 160914 Enterprise Zone Memorandum of Understanding
    Appendix I Draft version 1 160914 Enterprise Zone Memorandum of Understanding THIS AGREEMENT is dated [30 th September] 2016 PARTIES 1. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT whose principal address is 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF ( Secretary of State ); 2. Each of the local authorities for the area of the Enterprise Zone, whose names and principal addresses are listed at Schedule 1 (together the Relevant Local Authorities) 3. The Local Enterprise Partnership for the area of the Enterprise Zone, whose names and principal addresses are listed at Schedule 2 (where a local enterprise partnership does not have corporate status then the Accountable Body who acts as the representative is listed) (together with the Local Enterprise Partnership ) BACKGROUND A. The Secretary of State has the power to declare an area to be an Enterprise Zone. B. Enterprise Zones are single or multiple sites designated for business development which may offer business rate discounts or enhanced capital allowance for new businesses locating on the sites. Enterprise Zones are on sites which would ordinarily not be expected to generate significant business growth nor generate any business rates without incentives and /or dedicated local stakeholder support. Any increase from business rates income which arise from the development of an Enterprise Zone site will not be affected by business rates reform, reset or redistribution for a period of 25 years. C. A local enterprise partnership is a voluntary partnership between local authorities and businesses to help determine local economic priorities and lead economic growth within their local area. This includes arrangements for the establishment and operation of Enterprise Zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Local Kent Commitment
    Climate Local Kent Our commitment to taking action in a changing climate We recognise that we have an important role to help our residents and businesses to capture the opportunities and benefits of action on climate change. These include saving money on energy bills, generating income from renewable energy, attracting new jobs and investment in ‘green’ industries, supporting new sources of energy, managing local flood-risk and water scarcity and protecting our natural environment. We will progressively address the risks and pursue the opportunities presented by a changing climate, in line with local priorities, through our role as: • Community leader – helping local people and businesses to be smarter about their energy use and to prepare for climate impacts; • Service provider – delivering services that are resource efficient, less carbon intensive, resilient and that protect those who are most vulnerable to climate impacts; • Estate manager – ensuring that our own buildings and operations are resource efficient, use clean energy, and are well prepared for the impacts of a changing climate. In signing this commitment, we will: • Set locally-owned and determined commitments and actions to reduce carbon emissions and to manage climate impacts. These will be specific, measurable and challenging; • Publish our commitments, actions and progress, enabling local communities to hold us to account; • Share the learning from our experiences and achievements with other organisations; and • Regularly refresh our commitments and actions to ensure
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Code of Practice for Hygienic Skin Piercing
    Kent Code of Practice for Hygienic Skin Piercing Kent Councils working together Contact You should consult your local authority to find out about registering for skin piercing procedures, and to obtain a copy of their byelaws. Local authorities and organisations participating in this code of practice are listed below: • Ashford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Tannery Lane, Ashford, Kent TN23 1PL Tel: 01233 331111 • Canterbury City Council, Military Road, Canterbury CT1 1YW Tel: 01227 862000 • Dartford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent DA1 1DR Tel: 01322 343434 • Dover District Council, White Cliffs Business Park, Dover, Kent CT16 3PJ Tel: 01304 821199 • Gravesham Borough Council, Civic Centre, Windmill Street, Gravesend, Kent DA12 1AU Tel: 01474 564422 • Maidstone Borough Council, Swale House, East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent ME10 3HT Tel: 01795 417850 Email: [email protected] • Medway Council, Gun Wharf, Dock Road, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TR Tel: 01634 306000/01634 333333 • Sevenoaks District Council, Council Offices, Argyle Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 1HG Tel: 01732 227000 • Shepway District Council, The Civic Centre, Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, Kent CT20 2QY Tel: 01303 853000 • Swale Borough Council, Swale House, East Street, Sittingbourne, Kent ME10 3HT Tel: 01795 417850 Email: [email protected] • Thanet District Council, PO Box 9, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent CT9 1XZ Tel: 01843 577000 • Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council, Gibson Building, Gibson Drive,
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocal) Scheme (Krs
    KENT HIGH PRIORITY REHOUSING (RECIPROCAL) SCHEME (KRS) Joint Statement The purpose of this reciprocal scheme is to provide guidance and procedure for a voluntary reciprocal arrangement between the twelve Kent authorities, excluding Medway. The guidance points within the scheme should only be only in exceptional circumstances, when it is necessary to assist a household move from one borough to another. This scheme sets out a commitment from all local authorities to cooperate with regards not only the exporting of households, but the receiving of households. The aim of the Kent reciprocal scheme is to assist the Local Housing Authorities across the county to meet statutory homelessness duties to prevent and relieve homelessness. This scheme should be used to assist in rehousing an applicant in another borough/district who is at risk of domestic abuse, violence or serious harm within the borough/district who owe the applicant a homelessness duty. Points of Guidance of Procedure include the following: 1. The scheme is intended for applicants in all types of tenure who have become homeless or are threatened with homelessness, who is at risk of domestic abuse, violence or serious harm. 2. An allocation of accommodation may be made under Part VI of the Housing Act 1996 (as amended). Each local authority’s allocation scheme should include provision for offering accommodation via this reciprocal scheme. The local authority will accept the applicant onto their Housing Register and place the applicant into the highest band in accordance with their Allocations Policy for bidding and review their situation after three months. 3. If the local authority does not own its own stock, it will liaise with Registered Providers of social housing who have accommodation in the district.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 Consultation Report Appendices 5.32 – 5.33 (14 of 14)
    THE LONDON RESORT DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES Reference: BC080001 5.1 Consultation Report Appendices 5.32 – 5.33 (14 of 14) THE LONDON RESORT DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES Reference: BC080001 Appendix 5.32 Summary of engagement with organisations Schedule of key engagement – Key stakeholders 2020 Stakeholder Date Purpose of meeting Thurrock Council 04/03/2020 High Speed 1 26/03/2020 Re-introduction and project update Dartford Borough Council 30/03/2020 Transport Workshop 1 Ebbsfleet Development Corporation Gravesham Borough Council Highways England High Speed 1 Kent County Council Port of Tilbury Thames Clippers Thurrock Council Thames Gateway Partnership 01/04/2020 Thames Water 01/04/2020 Thames Clipper 03/04/2020 Shipping and ferry operations Port of Tilbury Ebbsfleet Development Corporation 06/04/2020 Ebbsfleet Central Port of London Authority 06/04/2020 River navigation Thurrock Council 22/04/2020 Creative Estuary 30/04/2020 University Of Kent Royal Opera House Dartford Borough Council 18/05/2020 Environmental briefing Gravesham Borough Council Thurrock Council Kent County Council Environment Agency Natural England Thames Clipper 22/05/2020 Tilbury & Swanscombe Ferry Pontoons High Speed 1 22/05/2020 Southeastern Franchise Gravesham Borough Council 27/05/2020 Draft Statement of Community Consultation and Community Liaison Group Ebbsfleet Development Corporation 27/05/2020 Draft Statement of Community Consultation and Community Liaison Group London Borough of Bexley 27/05/2020
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Planning List Week Ending 23 and 30 April 2021
    Kent Planning 1. Information for County Council Members on development proposals to be determined by the County Council received week ending: 23 and 30 April 2021 Presented by Sharon Thompson, Head of Planning Applications Group In light of the coronavirus and the need to keep people safe, the County Council has temporarily suspended notifying neighbours of planning applications submitted to the County Planning Application for decision. Whilst it is able to, it will continue to advertise applications via a site notice in the vicinity of the application site and where necessary a press notice. Details of live planning applications are available to view on the Councils website. Applications which will be determined by the County Council as County Planning Authority (i) COUNTY COUNCIL DEVELOPMENTS District Reference Details Canterbury KCC/CA/0089/2021 Proposed 1 form of entry expansion involving: a) the erection of a new freestanding two-storey teaching block; b) extension to existing dining building; c) alterations to bus zone area and parent drop off area; d) provision of additional 27 car parking spaces; e) removal of five temporary classroom buildings; and, f) associated landscaping works. Simon Langton Grammar School for Boys, Langton Lane, Nackington, Canterbury, Kent, CT4 7AS Case Officer: Alice Short Maidstone KCC/MA/0086/2021 Construction of a service road route for HGV and other vehicle deliveries, and concrete apron, with associated landscaping, lighting, and fencing. Newnham Court Farm, Bearsted Road, Weavering, Maidstone, Kent ME14 5LH Case Officer: Hazel Mallett Swale KCC/SW/0084/2021 Temporary modular classroom block. Borden Grammar School, Avenue of Remembrance, Sittingbourne, Kent ME10 4DB Case Officer: Helen Edwards (ii) MINERAL AND WASTE DISPOSAL DEVELOPMENTS District Reference Details Tonbridge & KCC/TM/0090/2021 Installation of ground mounted solar PV array and Malling associated infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • EDG Meeting Minutes June – Minutes Attending: Suzanne Wood, Chairman (SW) Medway Fibreglass Chris Inwood (CI) Gravesham B
    EDG Meeting June – Minutes Minutes Attending: Suzanne Wood, Chairman (SW) Medway Fibreglass Chris Inwood (CI) Gravesham Borough Council Clem Smith (CS) Medway Council Peter Cooper (PC) Penshurst Planning Steven Boxall (SB) Regeneration X Emma Harraden (EH) Hatten Wyatt Martin Garside (MG) Port of London Authority David Liston-Jones (DLJ) Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Janet Robinson (JR) Springfield Education & Training Stephen Parker (SP) Willmott Dixon Richard Lavender (RL) Chair Ashford EDG KICC Apologies: Alastair Gale Port of London Authority Robert Goodman Bluewater Gareth Edwards Gem Merchandising Richard Longman Thames Gateway Kent Partnership Lewis Kirnon (LK) Dartford Borough Council Phil Matthews (PM) North West Kent College / SUSCON Stacey Driver (SD) Stickleback Manufacturing Graham Moody (GM) North West Kent College / Maritime Carlo Gargiulo (CG) Swale Borough Council TIGER FUND: DLJ - Going well and have 30-40 applications across NK and Thurrock which will be approx. £6-7 m if approved. Rate and quality is good. Gravesham’s response is poor due to the sector definition which may need reviewing. The September board meeting may determine if this is to be the case. Mail shot going out from Kent County Council shortly.. CI - Few companies in Gravesham fit into the sector definitions and some are ineligible due to EU regulations. Many ICT businesses work from home so have limited access to the business magazines and mail shots – but the information about TIGER is readily available. Possibly a couple coming through soon. Paramount: Requirement for more information on this Lodge Hill and Chatham Waters: SB - Requirement for more information on these to enable decisions. SW – plan to gather feelings from group at next meeting Can we look at getting universities to join the group – this is still being considered – possibly early Autumn? ACTION: If anyone knows any universities then pass information on.
    [Show full text]