Proximity to Builder Proves Boon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proximity to Builder Proves Boon Bus order Proximity to builder proves boon Proximity of bus manufacturer to Also, as noted by Board President Jean , buyer - Gillig Corporation of Hayward Holmes, it's helpful to AC Transit's to AC Transit - has proven to be a policy-makers to be able to "observe boon, according to System Directors, first-hand the process and the problems management, operating and mainte­ of building buses to meet the require­ nance personnel. ments of our System." The advantages of having new coaches Says Nisbet, "With future acquisitions for AC Transit fleet replacement rolling we'll have to see who comes in meeting off an assembly line so near Downtown specs and with a low bid. But this I would like to bring to your attention I ride the bus rarely, so when I boarded Oakland headquarters and all operating purchase has proven to be a boon to a the excellence of one of your coach I had to ask the driver the correct fare, divisions have been particularly dra­ local transit system, two local manufac­ operators - M. E. Andrews. for a transfer, and directions to my matized since delivery began last month turers, to local bus riders, and to the tax­ In one instance, he aided a blind pas­ destination in Oakland. He was polite and of the first of 141 buses ordered from the payers. " senger onto another bus - actually stop­ helpful. When I changed buses, I showed firm formerly famous as a builder of ping the other bus and leading her onto my transfer to the driver who asked me school buses. it. Minutes later, he was providing writ­ to relinquish it. Later, I overheard the Maintenance and transportation peo­ ten instructions to a passenger who was driver tell someone who also wanted to ple have discovered how quickly produc­ lost. A woman had just run onto the bus keep her transfer that another transfer tion-line solutions can be agreed upon with her child, and Mr. Andrews waited could be obtained for half-price. when it's possible to meet instantly with patiently until she was seated before Why not have a sign with all this infor­ Gillig engineers to iron out problems moving the coach. mation about fares, transfers, ages, etc., right on the spot. Mr. Andrews' performance was above posted in every bus? In addition, why not Since Environmental Equipment Cor­ and beyond the ordinary. have it printed on the timetables, avail­ poration, which is furnishing the Gregory Look able to everyone. Newspapers would be wheelchair lifts being installed on these Berkeley glad to transmit changes. It would be buses, also is close by in San Leandro, THE COVER - A September 22 helpful (to the operator) as well. the onsite problem-solving potential is event marked the business link be­ * * * tween AC Transit, Gillig, and I believe that employees who are good Ellen Drori further increased. Berkeley "In this case, too, their nearness is a Environmental Equipment Corpora­ representatives of their employers tion which has present and future sig­ should be mentioned. Yesterday I was on (Ed. Note: See item, Pg. 6, about AC Tran­ definite advantage," according to General Manager Robert E. Nisbet. nificance for East Bay public trans­ a 51 bus from downtown Oakland to sit's rider in/ormation efforts.) portation and also provides a positive Alameda. On Santa Clara Avenue I "When lift-equipment problems arise, note in the recession-hit Alameda observed that the driver, Steven Hayes, * * * we examine them jointly and hasten the County employment picture. Among acted in a kind and compassionate man­ I would like to commend L. D. Morrow solution. " participants noting AC Transit' s ner toward an elderly gentleman. on being a very conscientious driver and There's also a dollar-saving benefit order for new buses from Gillig, with Rebecca Wolstenholme dedicated worker while exhibiting cour­ attached to this first-time situation of wheelchair lifts furnished by EEC, (upper left photo) were, left to right, Alameda teous responses to all questions. doing bus building business with an East Bay neighbor. Since the buses are driven Mayor Alex Giuliani, Hayward; Helen Ponzelli Board President Jean Holmes ; * * * Lafayette just a couple of miles from the assembly Recently I rode a bus driven by David site, the District pays substantially General Manager Robert E. Nisbet; reduced delivery charges. This unit sav­ Director William J. Bettencourt; and Pinckard, whom I found very friendly and * * * Gillig's John Olivera, vice president, courteous. As new passengers boarded, I was a passenger on a 51 bus yesterday ing, multiplied by the total order of 141 and Dennis Howard, president. he greeted them with a warm "good and was so impressed with the driver's coaches, adds up to nearly the purchase Nisbet (upper right photo) is shown morning", and I'm sure he brightened (L. H. Lee) gentlemanly, cheerful and price of an additional bus. with Kevin Adams, vice president, many of their days with his friendliness. helpful attitude and excellent handling of For the East Bay as a whole, the Gillig EEC. Organization officials, media, I think it really helps to promote a the bus down Broadway in heavy traffic order has meant several hundred jobs and guests gathered for the event good image of AC Transit. that could try the nerves of a saint. during a severe recession period in which Oower photo) in front of Gillig's Sarah Murray Mrs. J. H. Anderson Alameda County has been particularly Hayward manufacturing facility. El Cerrito Oakland hard-hit. 2 3 November election Fremont-Newark Study Candidates vie for four Board positions Survey spotlights transit consciousness Adults in Fremont and Newark - bus the bus service themselves expressed Four seats on AC Transit's policymak­ Alan Laird, and Hector Reyna, all of riders and non-riders alike - voice a great concern about maintaining it for ing Board of Directors will be determined Oakland. Constituency includes AC strong sense of community concern others in their community. by November 2 voting. The balloting by Transit's entire service area, from Rich­ about bus service in their cities. This was Although the non-riders responded District voters will take place in conjunc­ mond and San Pablo on the north to fre­ a key finding in a market survey con­ favorably to possible service adjustments tion with the statewide general election mont. ducted for the District. that they found personally attractive - of that date. The riders voiced substantial satisfac­ such as more frequent commute-hour bus Board seats to be determined are those Bus service kicks off tion with the bus service (as reported in service - they voiced strong opposition to which represent Wards III, IV and V, the May, 1982, Transit Times), and they achieving such changes by 'trading ofT' plus one Director-at-Large constituency. For UC football games voiced considerable concern about main­ service levels currently operated midday. Those Directors elected in November The Golden Bears and the bus fleet taining present levels of service. Both riders and non-riders gave top will serve four-year terms which will joined forces as of mid-September when In the second phase of the two-part billing to close-at-home bus stops in begin January 3, 1983. AC Transit kicked off service to Univer­ survey - in-depth, 20-minute telephone expressing their attitudes about their Ward III currently is represented by sity of California, Berkeley, football interviews conducted with some 200 local bus network. This coincides with John McDonnell, seeking re-election in games for the 1982 season. adult nonriders - even those respon­ AC Transit's own long-standing concept competition with Cecilia L. Phillips and Football fans can get to Memorial dents who voiced little interest in using of the importance of bus stops near Myrna Ochoa Valdez. All are Oakland Stadium without traffic-hassles or park­ homes. residents. Ward III comprises the cities ing headaches by using AC Transit Lines Two take new positions as However, while riders gave second of Alameda and Piedmont, and that part 40 and 51151A. Shuttle service also is place to 'economy' among their five of Oakland which is south of Highway 24, operated between Third & University Assistant superintendents 'very important' reasons for riding buses, northeast of the MacArthur Freeway, and Bancroft & Piedmont for local riders non-riders ranked public transit's dollar­ and south of 35th Ave. It includes the and for blue-and-gold fans coming from saving potential as fifth among their con­ Elmhurst, Fruitvale, Melrose, Mills­ San Francisco on regular Line F buses. cerns when viewing the bus-use option. mont, Montclair, Oakmore, Oak Knoll, BART riders may transfer to Line 51 Important motivators for transit use, Piedmont Pines, Seminary and Sheffield buses at BART /Rockridge or at BART / both groups agreed, are such factors as Village areas. Berkeley. freedom from parking problems and Ward IV is now represented by Regular fares prevail for the stadium good service to the workplace and to William J. Bettencourt, San Leandro. service. BART passengers pay half-fare shopping centers. The other candidate for the seat is Philip by showing their bus transfers obtained The information gathered on aware­ J. Adams, Hayward. Ward IV encom­ within the paid area of the BART sta­ Don Myers Bill Schmid ness, attitudes and opinions of both passes the city of San Leandro, the unin­ tions. riders and non-riders in the two cities is corporated areas of Ashland, Castro Don R. Myers and William F. Schmid now being studied for incorporation into Valley, San Lorenzo, the portion of are new assistant superintendents in the future service planning and transit infor­ Hayward east of the Southern Pacific Transportation Department's Seminary mation efforts.
Recommended publications
  • A Review Across Us Transit Agencies
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Transportation Engineering Masters Projects Civil and Environmental Engineering 2018 ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES Aikaterini Deliali Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cee_transportation Part of the Transportation Engineering Commons Deliali, Aikaterini, "ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES" (2018). Transportation Engineering Masters Projects. 5. https://doi.org/10.7275/78av-7x59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Engineering Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES A Project Presented by AIKATERINI DELIALI Master of Science in Civil Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 4/5/2018 iv ABSTRACT Globally there have been considerable efforts of decarbonizing the transportation sector, as it has been found to be largely responsible for greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. One strategy to achieving this is the implementation of zero-emission buses in transit fleets. This paper summarizes the characteristics of three zero-emission bus technologies: 1) battery electric buses; 2) fuel cell battery electric buses; and 3) fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric buses. All of these technologies do not produce tailpipe emission and can potentially be emission-free in a well-to-wheel content, depending on the fuel source.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-08 TIP Revision Summary
    TIP Revision Summary 2017-08 Funding Funding TIP ID Sponsor Project Name Description of Change Change ($) Change (%) System: Transit ALA090065 Bay Area Rapid Transit BART: Fare Collection Equipment Update the funding plan to add $6.2M in 5337 and $1.6M in local funds for CON in $7,763,750 25.0% District (BART) FY 17 ALA170014 Union City Transit Union City Paratransit Van Procurement Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $846K in 5307, and $186K in TDA $1,032,000 ~% funds in CON FY 17 ALA170015 Union City Transit Union City Transit: Replace Paratransit Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $141K in 5307, and $35K in TDA $176,300 ~% Sedan funds in CON FY 17 ALA170027 Alameda Contra Costa AC Transit: Purchase 10 Double-Decker Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $7.9M in 5307 funds and $2.4M in $10,248,896 ~% Transit District (AC Buses local funds Transit) ALA170028 Alameda Contra Costa AC Transit: Purchase 18 40ft Hybrid-Electric Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $10.8M in 5307 funds and $3.2M $14,040,000 ~% Transit District (AC Buses local funds Transit) ALA170029 Alameda Contra Costa AC Transit: Preventive Maintenance (Swap) Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $5.4M in 5307 funds and $1.6M in $7,020,000 ~% Transit District (AC local funds Transit) ALA170030 Alameda Contra Costa AC Transit: Preventive Maintenance Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $2.1M in 5307 funds and $520K local $2,600,000 ~% Transit District (AC (Deferred Comp) funds Transit) ALA170032 Alameda Contra Costa AC Transit: Purchase 19 60-ft Artic Urban Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $14M in 5307 funds, $1.3M in 5339 $22,157,520 ~% Transit District (AC Buses funds, and $6.8M in bridge toll funds Transit) ALA170039 Union City Transit Union City: ADA Paratransit Operating Amend a new exempt project into the TIP with $134K in 5307 and $34K Local funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Range Transit Plan
    ^ZϭϵͲϰϬϲ Short-Range Transit Plan Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District SRTP | Fiscal Years 2019 – 2029 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Reasons for Preparing the SRTP ................................................................................. 7 1.2 Current and Previous SRTP ........................................................................................ 7 1.3 Relationship to Other Plans, Projects, and Actions ..................................................... 7 1.4 SRTP Structure .......................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Overview, The AC Transit District and AC Transit ......................................... 9 2.1 The AC Transit district—the place where AC Transit provides service ......................... 9 2.2 Serving the AC Transit District—AC Transit and Other Operators ............................... 12 2.3 Timeline of AC Transit and Related History ................................................................ 13 2.4 Governance and Organizational Structure ................................................................. 14 2.5 Unions at AC Transit ................................................................................................. 15 2.6 Contracted Transportation Services ........................................................................... 15 2.7 Service Structure and Service Types ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No. 08-044 Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: March 12, 2008
    AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No. 08-044 Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: March 12, 2008 Committees: Planning Committee Finance and Audit Committee External Affairs Committee Operations Committee Rider Complaint Committee Paratransit Committee Board of Directors Financing Corporation SUBJECT: General Manager’s Quarterly Report, 2nd Quarter, October-December 2007 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information Only Briefing Item Recommended Motion Receive General Manager's Report for quarterly reporting purposes. Fiscal Impact: None Background/Discussion: Attached is the General Manager’s Quarterly Report for the period ending December 31, 2007. Per Board action, this report serves to replace various quarterly and semi-annual reports that were formerly submitted to the Operations or Finance Committees. The full bound report was distributed to the Board prior to this meeting. Two additional reports are presented with this memo as attachments: East Bay Paratransit Quarterly Summary addendum to the Accessible Services Report, and the Purchasing Dept. report. Prior Relevant Board Actions/Policies: N/A Attachments: 1. East Bay Paratransit Quarterly Summary 2. Purchasing Dept. Quarterly Report 3. GM Quarterly Report – 2nd Quarter, October-December 2007 (cover page only) Approved by: Rick Fernandez, General Manager Prepared by: Jim Gleich, Deputy General Manager Date Prepared: February 29, 2008 BOARD ACTION: Approved as Recommended [ ] Other [ ] Approved with Modification(s) [ ] The above order was passed on: . Linda A. Nemeroff, District Secretary By GM Memo No. 08-044 Attachment 1 Department: Submitted by: Extension: Accessible Services M. Nestor-Brush 7213 Quarterly Report Summary 2nd Quarter - FY 2007-08 Prepared for AC Transit Ridership and Productivity Total ridership in the period was equal to 162,587 passengers which is higher than the same quarter last year; 158,628 passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Fifth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory
    Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Fifth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-66039 June 2016 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Fifth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. HT12.8210 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5400-66039 Golden, CO 80401 June 2016 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Sixth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory
    Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Sixth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-68413 September 2017 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Results: Sixth Report Leslie Eudy, Matthew Post, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. HT12.8210 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5400-68413 Golden, CO 80401 September 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Project Listings
    Transit Project Listings Transit Projects Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) TIP ID: ALA010034 County: Alameda System: Transit RTP ID: 17-10-0026 CTIPS 20600002155 Sponsor: Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) Implementing Agency: Alameda Contra Costa Transit District Project Name: AC Transit: Facilities Upgrade Description: AC Transit: Systemwide: Agency's facilities & equipment upgrades. Air Quality Exempt Code: 2.08 - EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities, stations, terminals, and ancillary structures) Route: Post Mile From: Post Mile To: Toll Credits: All funding in thousands of dollars Phase Fund Source Prior Years FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 Future Years Total Programmed CON 5307 $ 24,474 $ 24,474 CON 5309 $ 6,177 $ 6,177 CON BT $ 1,482 $ 1,482 CON OTHER LOCAL $ 11,480 $ 11,480 CON PROP $ 4,346 $ 4,346 CON RIP $ 3,705 $ 3,705 CON STP $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Total Programmed Funding: $ 55,663 $ 55,663 TIP ID: ALA150004 County: Alameda System: Transit RTP ID: 17-01-0060 CTIPS 20600005855 Sponsor: Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) Implementing Agency: Alameda Contra Costa Transit District Project Name: AC Transit: East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Description: Alameda County: Along Broadway/ International/E 14th corridor from Oakland to San Leandro: Implement BRT including 34 stations, transit signal priority, level-boarding, shelters, off-board ticketing, real-time information,
    [Show full text]
  • AC Transit 2010 Environmental Sustainability Report
    Filmsight Productions Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District 2010 Environmental Sustainability Report Prepared by Environmental Science Associates San Francisco, CA March 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS AC Transit 2010 Environmental Sustainability Report A Message from the General Manager .....................................................1 1. AC Transit’s Value and Role ................................................................2 2. Our Organization ..............................................................................3 Governance ................................................................................. 3 Environmental Departments ............................................................ 4 Environmental Justice and Social Equity ........................................... 4 Trends in Service and Ridership ...................................................... 5 3. Increasing Ridership ..........................................................................8 Supporting Transit-Oriented Developments ....................................... 8 Increasing Customer Satisfaction .................................................... 9 NextBus and 511 Departures ......................................................... 12 4. Reducing Our Environmental Impact ...................................................13 Planning ...................................................................................... 13 Buses .......................................................................................... 14 Our Facilities ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT TO: AC Transit Board of Directors
    TI"?-9'1115/T Report No: 15-017 -AI Meeting Date: March 25, 2015 Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District STAFF REPORT TO: AC Transit Board of Directors FROM: David J. Armijo, General Manager SUBJECT: Update on Zero Emission Bus Technologies BRIEFING ITEM RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Consider receiving an update on zero emission bus technologies that are currently available for procurement for a discussion on the District's path for future zero emission bus procurements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The transit bus industry has been a testing ground for the reduction of vehicle emissions for several decades. In the early part of the 21st century, both the automobile industry and transit bus manufacturers have made significant advancements on zero emission propulsion systems for light and heavy duty vehicles. The primary focus of the zero emission technologies has been on the development of the fuel cell and battery electric propulsion systems. As the District continues to pursue grant opportunities to fund its zero emission initiatives, an update on zero emission technologies is needed to determine the District's zero emission path going forward. Both zero emission fuel cell and battery electric bus technologies have advanced in the last several years, and bus manufacturers have initiated the marketing of both technologies to provide for new bus procurement options for transit agencies. Both battery electric bus and hydrogen fuel cell bus have equipment and facility benefits and limitations that must be considered for future bus procurements. This report provides information and costs for zero emission bus technologies and infrastructure being demonstrated at transit agencies and available in the marketplace to assist in making decisions on a path moving forward for zero emission bus demonstration and replacement programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Division 4 (D4) Modifications to Accommodate Battery Electric Buses As Part of the 45 Zero Emission Bus Purchase
    DIVISION 4 (D4) MODIFICATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES AS PART OF THE 45 ZERO EMISSION BUS PURCHASE Division 4 (D4) Modifications to Accommodate Battery Electric Buses as part of the 45 Zero Emission Bus Purchase INITIAL STUDY/PRELIMINARY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION September 2019 1 DIVISION 4 (D4) MODIFICATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES AS PART OF THE 45 ZERO EMISSION BUS PURCHASE INITIAL STUDY – PRELIMINARY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date: September 26, 2019 Project Title: AC Transit Division 4 Modification to Accommodate 45 New Zero Emission Buses (ZEBs) as Part of the ZEB Transition Plan Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District Lead Agency name and address: 1600 Franklin Street Oakland, CA 94612 Contact Person and phone number: Mika Miyasato Project Manager Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District 1600 Franklin Street Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 891-7138 Project Location: Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District Division 4 1100 Seminary Avenue Oakland, CA 94621 Temporary Bus Parking 6235 Tevis Street Oakland CA 94621 Project Sponsor’s name and address: Mika Miyasato Project Manager Alameda-Contra Costa County Transit District 1600 Franklin Street Oakland, CA 94612 General Plan Designation: General Industry and Transportation Zoning: IG (Industrial General) and IG/S-19 (Industrial General/Health & Safety Protection Overlay) 2 DIVISION 4 (D4) MODIFICATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES AS PART OF THE 45 ZERO EMISSION BUS PURCHASE Table of ContentsInitial Study – Preliminary Mitigated Negative
    [Show full text]