DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 13: Mentally Disabled Persons in Prisons and Jails

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 13: Mentally Disabled Persons in Prisons and Jails REPRESENTING MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Chapter 13: Mentally Disabled Persons in Prisons and Jails TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3 II. DEFINITION: WHAT IS MENTAL ILLNESS? .................................................................................................... 3 III. PRISON POPULATION ................................................................................................................................ 5 A. FEMALE OFFENDERS..................................................................................................................................... 5 B. GENDER DIFFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO MENTAL HEALTH ...................................................................................... 6 C. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE PRISONS ............................................................................................................ 7 Indigenous Female Offenders ............................................................................................................................ 8 D. OLDER OFFENDERS ...................................................................................................................................... 9 IV. FEDERAL PENITENTIARIES AND PROVINCIAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ..................................................10 V. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL DISABILITY IN PRISON AND JAIL ........................................................................16 A. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS ............................................................................................................16 B. PROVINCIAL JAILS .......................................................................................................................................19 C. MENTALLY HANDICAPPED PRISONERS ..............................................................................................................20 VI. MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS IN PENITENTIARIES AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ...............................22 A. GENERAL—CONDITIONS IN PENITENTIARIES AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES .............................................................22 B. MENTALLY DISABLED PRISONERS ....................................................................................................................24 1. Problems Encountered in the Regular Population ...............................................................................25 (a) Mentally Handicapped Prisoners ..................................................................................................................25 (b) Mentally Ill Prisoners ...................................................................................................................................27 2. Special Handling Units and Administrative Segregation......................................................................30 (a) Current Practices in Administrative Segregation ...........................................................................................31 (b) Drivers of Change in Administrative Segregation Practices ............................................................................32 (c) Administrative Segregation’s Application to Mentally Ill................................................................................35 C. OBLIGATION OF PRISON OFFICIALS TO PROTECT MENTALLY DISABLED INMATES .........................................................37 VII. TRANSFERS OF MENTALLY DISABLED PRISONERS ....................................................................................39 VIII. RIGHT TO TREATMENT IN PRISON AND JAIL ...........................................................................................44 A. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................44 B. CORRECTIONS LEGISLATION AND THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT..................................................................................45 C. COMMON LAW RIGHTS TO TREATMENT ...........................................................................................................47 D. BARRIERS TO EXERCISING THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT ..........................................................................................51 E. THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION'S POSITION ON THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT AND MENTALLY DISABLED PRISONERS ..........53 IX. RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT IN PRISON AND JAIL.................................................................................54 A. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................54 B. CONSENT TO TREATMENT .............................................................................................................................55 1. Informed Consent ..............................................................................................................................55 2. Exceptions to the Rules ......................................................................................................................57 (a) Emergency ..................................................................................................................................................57 (b) Best Interests of the Patient ........................................................................................................................58 (c) Incapacity ....................................................................................................................................................58 Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre Current to April 2018 Page 1 REPRESENTING MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 3. Capacity to Consent to Treatment......................................................................................................61 4. Assessing Capacity to Consent to Treatment ......................................................................................63 5. Voluntariness and Consent—The “Captive” Patient ............................................................................67 C. RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT, FEDERAL CORRECTIONS LEGISLATION AND PROVINCIAL LAW .........................................68 X. TREATMENT IN MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES..............................................................................................70 A. THE ALBERTA MENTAL HEALTH ACT................................................................................................................70 1. General .............................................................................................................................................70 2. Persons Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder ....................................................73 3. Persons Found Unfit to Stand Trial .....................................................................................................74 B. CHARTER OF RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT ...............................................................76 XI. ROLE OF CORRECTIONAL INVESTIGATOR AND PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN ..............................................80 XII. RECIDIVISM AND MENTALLY DISABLED PRISONERS ................................................................................81 XIII. CONCLUSION – RECOMMENDATIONS AND STRATEGIES WITH RESPECT TO MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS .84 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..............................................................................................................................................88 Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre Current to April 2018 Page 2 REPRESENTING MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM I. Introduction This chapter discusses various aspects of imprisonment and its effect on mentally disabled offenders. It examines the prevalence of mental illness in incarcerated persons and the difficulties faced by these prisoners. It also outlines various human rights issues, the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment while incarcerated. Finally, the chapter discusses the role of the Correctional Investigator and the provincial Ombudsman in assisting mentally disabled prisoners. II. Definition: what is mental illness? The term “Mental Disorders”, as discussed here, may include bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders,1 Alzheimer’s Disease, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), personality disorders, and problems resulting from traumatic head injuries and other disorders that influence the functioning of an individual.2 It is estimated that up to fifty per cent of prisoners in the criminal justice system have an anti-social personality disorder referred as to psychopathy.3 Mental illness is a health issue rather than a criminal law matter.4 As a result, the criminal justice system has proven ill-equipped to deal with people who suffer from mental illness. For centuries, persons with a mental illness have been systematically isolated, segregated from the mainstream of society, devalued, ridiculed, and excluded from participation in ordinary social and political processes.5 The criminal justice system is based on a set of assumptions, such as that people act in a voluntary manner that is determined 1 Beverly Spencer, “A Different Kind of Justice” 20 The Canadian Bar Association: National 5 (July-August 2011).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Causes of Male Sexual Assault: a Case Study of the Kokstad Medium Correctional Centre
    UNDERSTANDING THE CAUSES OF MALE SEXUAL ASSAULT: A CASE STUDY OF THE KOKSTAD MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL CENTRE by SIPHELELE NOKWETHEMBA MTSHALI (212535976) Submitted in fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree: Master of Social Sciences, in Criminology and Forensic Studies School of Applied Human Sciences College of Humanities University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor Dr. Siyanda Dlamini November, 2018 i DECLARATION This is to confirm that this research is my own work which I have never previously submitted to any other university for any purpose. The references used and cited have been acknowledged. Signature of candidate…………………………………… On the ………………day of ………………………. 2018 (Mtshali, S.N 212535976) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My gratitude goes to my supervisor Doctor Siyanda Dlamini for his guidance and patience throughout the course of my studies. Most importantly for his constructive feedback. I appreciate the support, love, and sacrifices of my parents Mr. and Mrs. Mtshali and my siblings (Sihle, Sibahle, Thokozani, Thandaza and Liyema) none of this would have been possible without your love. This one is for us. The grace of God for seeing me through these two years and finding favour in His eyes. To my friends who supported me through it all, blessings to you all. Uyabonga uMakhondlo! iii ABSTRACT Correctional centres are regarded as places of rehabilitation; however, this is not always the case. Correctional centres of the 21st century in South Africa seem to be a breeding place for the victimisation of offenders. One of the main purposes of environmental criminology is to successfully prevent the occurrence of crime through crime prevention strategies. Environmental Criminology considers the way in which the environment can contribute to the occurrence of crime and thus developing strategies that will alter the environment into preventing the crime from occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Clashes in Confinement: Men's Gendered Experiences With
    CLASHES IN CONFINEMENT: MEN’S GENDERED EXPERIENCES WITH CONFLICT IN CANADIAN PRISONS By Alicia D. Horton A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY KINGSTON, ONTARIO, CANADA DECEMBER 2016 Copyright Alicia D. Horton 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation presents the results of in-depth qualitative interviews with twenty-three formerly imprisoned men regarding their lived experience with prison conflict and the pain of incarceration. The results suggest that prison is a gendered ‘total institution’ (Goffman 1961). The pains that men experience in prison are uniquely gendered in that the deprivations imposed by incarceration– deprivation of autonomy, liberty, goods and services, heterosexual sex, and security (Sykes 1958) – in the reverse, define idealized masculinity as it is currently socially constructed: self-reliance, independence, toughness or invulnerability, material and economic success, and heterosexual prowess. From these shared deprivations emerges a gendered code of conduct that perpetuates a hierarchy among incarcerated men by constructing violent masculinity as a subcultural norm. The results suggest that the gender code in prison represents a set of rules that create opportunities for men to police each other’s gender performance and make claims to masculine statuses. Because status is inextricably tied to survival in this context, many men feel pressured to perform violent masculinities in prison despite privately subscribing to a non-violent sense of self-concept. The results suggest that violence is an expressive and instrumental resource for men in prison. A gender theory of prison violence, methodological findings, theoretical implications, ethical considerations and the short and long term aftermath of violent prison conflict are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Convict Leasing and the Construction of Carceral
    RAGGED BATTALIONS, PLOTTING LIBERTY: CONVICT LEASING AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF CARCERAL CAPITALISM IN FLORIDA, 1875-1925 E. Carson Eckhard AN HONORS THESIS in HIstory Presented to the Faculty of the Department of HIstory of the UniversIty of Pennsylvania in PartIal Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts wIth Honors 2021 Warren Breckman, Honors Seminar Director Mia Bay, Thesis Advisor _____________________________ Sinyen Fei Undergraduate Chair, Department of History I Acknowledgements This project would not have been possIble wIthout the many people who supported me along the way. I would lIke to thank my advisors, MIa Bay and Warren Breckman for theIr constant support, encouragement and feedback on every draft. I am also grateful to the Andrea MItchell Center for the Study of Democracy, whose financIal support made my archival research possIble. I would also lIke to thank Jeff Green, Matt Shafer, GIdeon Cohn-Postar and Paul Wolff MItchell for theIr feedback and support throughout this Process. Thank you also to Scott WIlds for his genealogical assIstance, on this project and on others throughout my tIme at Penn. I would also lIke to thank Kathleen Brown for InsPIring me to pursue historical research and supportIng me these past four years, and Gabriel Raeburn, for IntroducIng me to Penn’s HIstory Department. AdditIonally, NatalIa Rommen and MIsha McDaniel’s love, lIstening and support empowered me throughout this project. Lastly, I am endlessly grateful to my famIly and friends, whose encouragement and patIence made this process possIble and enjoyable. I am especIally thankful for my grandparents, Janie and Harry ClIne, who have nurtured my love of history sInce I was a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Film As a Pedagogical Tool for the Teaching and Learning of Social Justice- Orientated Citizenship Education
    Lights, Camera, Civic Action! Film as a pedagogical tool for the teaching and learning of social justice- orientated citizenship education. Daryn Bevan Egan-Simon A thesis submitted to the Department of Education, Edge Hill University, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. July 2020 Abstract Citizenship education in England is largely based on a deficit model of young people that positions them as compliant economic subjects rather than active agents of change (Olser and Starkey, 2003; Kisby, 2017; Weinberg and Flinders, 2018). Furthermore, provision for citizenship education has been described as inadequate, ineffective, sterile and lacking in pedagogical innovation (Turner, 2009; Garratt and Piper, 2012; Kerr et al., 2010). This study addresses the question: how can short animated film be used as a pedagogical tool for the teaching and learning of social justice-orientated citizenship education? Within the study, social justice-orientated citizenship education is conceptualised within a framework consisting of four constitutive elements: agency; dialogue; criticality; and emancipatory/ transformative knowledge. As part of the enquiry, a film-based social justice-orientated citizenship education programme (Lights, Camera, Civic Action!) was designed and organically developed with twelve Year 5 children during the Spring, Summer and Autumn Terms of 2018. An intrinsic case study (Stake, 1995; 2005) was employed as the strategy of enquiry with the preferred qualitative methods of data collection being focus group interviews, participant observations and the visual and technical documents created by the children. Thematic Analysis was used as the analytical method for identifying and reporting themes found through the codification of data sets (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Castlebury and Nolen, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • FREE PDF Version
    WriteAPrisoner.com’s SELF-HELP GUIDE FOR INMATES Flourishing Through Adversity WriteAPrisoner.com’s SELF-HELP GUIDE FOR INMATES Flourishing Through Adversity Adam Lovell Copyright © 2017 by Adam Lovell Cover design by VisualArts/Fiverr Illustrations by GraphicHarvest/Fiverr Published by WriteAPrisoner.com ISBN-10: 0-692-85478-9 ISBN-13: 978-0-692-85478-5 Author’s Note When I launched WriteAPrisoner.com in 2000 my goal was to help inmates maintain positive relationships with friends and family on the outside. After receiving countless requests for information and advice, the site introduced its first self-help guide, BACK TO WORK. That led to the creation of 15 documents that have since been shared with thousands of inmates. This book has been largely compiled based on the feedback we have received from the prison community. If you would like to share your feedback or success story, please address your letter to: WriteAPrisoner.com Self-help Feedback P.O. Box 10 Edgewater, FL 32132 Wishing you all the best to get your life on track for a bright future! -- Adam Lovell Disclaimer WriteAPrisoner.com makes no claims to be experts on the material in this book and cannot be held liable as a result of any action you take based on this information. This book is an informational guide and is not intended as legal or professional advice. It is recommended that you research all content yourself and consult a professional if you have questions. Table of Contents Section I: The Basics Chapter 1: Going To Prison Chapter 2: Visiting Prison Chapter 3:
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Autistic Individuals in Prison-Based Interventions to Address Sexual Offending
    Working with autistic individuals in prison-based interventions to address sexual offending Luke Paul Vinter A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. December 2020. 1 Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner(s) of the Intellectual Property Rights. 2 Acknowledgements Those who know me well know that I am not one to be particularly expressive or sentimental. However, in completing this thesis, I would feel remiss if I did not thank several people. First and foremost, I would like to thank all individuals from HMP Whatton and HMP Stafford (residents and staff alike) who took the time to participate in, advised on, and/or otherwise helped to facilitate my research. Without you all, this project would not have come to fruition. I would like to thank my supervision team- Dr Gayle Dillon, Prof Belinda Winder, and Dr Craig Harper. Gayle; without you, I would not be the same person that I am today. Beyond your guidance on this project, you helped me to build my conceptualisation of autism, taught me how to be strategic, provided me with invaluable career advice, and, most importantly, you have been an incredible role model for how to support others- thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. VICTIMIZATION BEHIND THE WALLS: SOCIAL CONTROL IN MALE FEDERAL PRISONd A Report on Victimization in Male Prisons Prepared for The Correctional Service of Canada Dennis Cooley Department of Sociology University of Manitoba April 1992 HV 9507 C56 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the staff of the prisons where interviews were conducted for extending helping hands and easing the administrative difficulties involved in co- ordinating a large project in a small time.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Violence in Prison & Hyper-Masculinities in the 'Hood
    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 37 Access to Justice: Mass Incarceration and Masculinity Through a Black Feminist Lens January 2011 Gender Violence in Prison & Hyper-masculinities in the 'Hood: Cycles of Destructive Masculinity SpearIt Saint Louis University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation SpearIt, Gender Violence in Prison & Hyper-masculinities in the 'Hood: Cycles of Destructive Masculinity, 37 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 89 (2011), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol37/iss1/5 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gender Violence in Prison & Hyper-masculinities in the ’Hood: Cycles of Destructive Masculinity SpearIt† TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM ..................................................... 90 A. Gender Norms in Society ...................................................... 95 1. Pornography & Prostitution ........................................... 99 2. Hate Language ............................................................. 103 B. Prison Reproductions
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for the Study
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49835-7 — Competing for Control David C. Pyrooz , Scott H. Decker Excerpt More Information 1 Foundation for the Study At the turn of the century, James Jacobs, New York University law professor and author of Stateville (1977), lamented: “It is hard to understand why the prison gang phenomenon does not attract more attention from the media, scholars, and policy analysts” (2001,vi).Certainly,prisonsaredangerous places that impact communities as well as the lives of inmates and those who work there. Over the last several years, prison gangs have made headlines across the country. The 2013 inmate hunger strike in California – involving over 30,000 inmates – was organized by black, Latino, and white gang members housed in solitary confinement for indeterminate sentences (Reiter 2016); the executive director of the Colorado Department of Corrections was executed on the doorstep of his home in 2013 by a recently released 211 Crew prison gang member (Prendergast 2014); and a multi-jurisdictional task force led to the indictments of nearly seventy-five Aryan Brotherhood of Texas gang members, some of whom were implicated in the blowtorch removal of a gang tattoo, the inspiration for a Sons of Anarchy episode (Schiller 2016). These are just a few of the events that illustrate the significance of prison gangs for society. Despite these important events, a recent systematic review and analysis of the study of gangs confirms Jacobs’s lament (Pyrooz and Mitchell 2015). For each article, essay, or book written about gangs and gang members under any form of incarceration – juvenile, jail, or prison systems – there were twenty-five works written about gangs and gang members in street settings.
    [Show full text]
  • 11PLN20.Final-Web.Pdf
    30th Anniversary Issue! Prison Legal News PUBLISHED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER VOL. 31 No. 11 November 2020 ISSN 1075-7678 Dedicated to Protecting Human Rights Milestone: Thirty Years of Prison Legal News and the Human Rights Defense Center by Paul Wright riginally we were planning to 30th anniversary. Yale law professor and and mailed to 75 potential subscribers with Ocelebrate the 30th anniversary of Pris- author James Forman Jr. will be our keynote a budget of $50. The first three issues were on Legal News (PLN) in the May 2020 issue. speaker. Details on the event and how to banned in all Washington state prisons, However, with the COVID-19 pandemic attend virtually are inside this issue. the first 18 in all Texas prisons. Since then impacting prisoners and the criminal justice When I started PLN in 1990 I was 25 we have published 367 consecutive issues, system we decided to postpone it until later years old and three years into a life sentence. grown to 72 pages with offset printing and in the year given the urgency of reporting The United States had a million people now have approximately 9,000 subscribers on the pandemic. We also had planned to locked in cages. Today, I am 55 years old and in all 50 states. PLN long ago became the do events in Seattle and New York City to have been out of prison for 17 years, and the longest continuously published indepen- commemorate our 30th anniversary as we United States has around 2.5 million people dent prisoner rights publication in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Man up Or Punk Out: the Role of Masculinity in Prison Rape
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 Man Up Or Punk Out: The Role Of Masculinity In Prison Rape Melanie Carlson University of Central Florida Part of the Sociology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Carlson, Melanie, "Man Up Or Punk Out: The Role Of Masculinity In Prison Rape" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3961. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3961 MAN UP OR PUNK OUT: THE ROLE OF MASCULINITY IN PRISON RAPE by MELANIE CARLSON B.A. California State University, Chico, 2003 M.A. California State University, Chico, 2005 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Sociology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2009 Major Professor: Elizabeth Ehrhardt Mustaine ABSTRACT Using the dataset, “Ethno-Methodological Study of the Subculture of Prison Inmate Sexuality in the United States, 2004-2005,” this study investigated the relationship between masculinities and prison rape. These data was collected in 23 men’s correctional institutions in 10 states. Between April 2004 and September 2005, 409 males were interviewed (Fleisher & Krienert, 2006). Findings showed that masculinity plays a complex and crucial role in the phenomenon of prison rape.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners Resource Guide UPDATED June 2011
    Fall 08 Prisoner Resource Guide Legal Support . Free Book Resources . Pen Pal Correspondence . Creative Writing and Artistic Resour ces . Jobs and Careers . Re-entry Assistance, Family Support, and Continued Education Equal Justice USA . 20 Jay Street . Suite 808 . Brooklyn . NY . 11201 . 718 – 801 – 8940 . [email protected] Prisoner Resource Guide Table of Contents Legal Support ………………………………..………………………………..………………………………..……………….2 Free Book Resources ………………………………..………………………………..…………………………………….7 Pen Pal Correspondence ………………………………..………………………………..……………………………..9 Creative Writing and Artistic Resources ………………………………..…………………………………..12 Jobs and Careers ………………………………..………………………………..………………………………………….14 Re-entry Assistance, Family Support, and Continued Education …………………………….15 1 Equal Justice USA ♦ 20 Jay Street, Suite 808, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (718) 801-8940 ♦ www.ejusa.org ♦ [email protected] Prisoner Resource Guide Legal Support ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)’s Prisoner’s Assistance Directory National Prison Project Publications, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York NY 10004 ! Tel: (212) 549-2500 ! Website: http://www.aclu.org/prisoners-rights/prisoners-assistance-directory-2008 The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United
    [Show full text]