Celebration Year for Territorials
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Troops Meet No Fight in Taking IRA Enelaves
Mancheater-— A City of Village Charm MANCHESTER, CONN., MONDAY, JULY 3X, 1972 Barriers Troops Meet No Fight Collapse By ED BL.ANGHE LONDONERRY, Northern Ireland (AP) — The first sol In Taking IRA Enelaves diers sllpx>ed silently into the Creggan district of Londonder ry, their blackened faces LONDONDERRY North- extent of what has happened kept up barrages of obscenities, down their roadblocks as soon streaked by rain. ern Ireland (A P )—__ British sunk in and they have had Outside a church, a crowd of as the troops appeared. Troops flitted through «>e - ' ' . A fIvMA fn fnllr If- women who had attended Mass The army’s main target was drizzle to take cover in dark- army spokesman said the shouted at a convoy roaring "Free Derry ’ the Bogside and ened doorways. Suburban lawns ^ troops suffered no casualties past; "W e’ll rise again and Creggan districts of Londonder- became a quagmire. the Irish Republi^n Arniy shot four gunmen during you'll know about it.” ry» ringed by concrete and iron At 4 a.m. a heavy force of in Londonderry, Belfast the night. The bodies of two "They'll be back,” women barricades, where the IRA has armored cars and armored per- and other areas before men were brought to a London- supporters of the IRA shouted, held unchallenged military sohnel carriers loaded with dawn today and encounter- derry hospital. ’The troops also flooded into sway for more than a year, troops nosed toward the barri- g(J almost no rsistance. It was the biggest military of- IRA havens in Armagh and At 4 a.m. -
Conclusions and Overall Assessment of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons Dated 15 June 2010 for The
Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment of the Principal Conclusions and Overall Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Bloody Sunday Inquiry Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: The Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment Online (Chapters 1–5 of the report) are reproduced in this volume www.tsoshop.co.uk This volume is accompanied by a DVD containing the full Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO text of the report PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone: 028 9023 8451 Fax: 028 9023 5401 HC30 £19.50 Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey -
Volume I Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons Dated 15 June 2010 for The
Report of the Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume I Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Volume I Outline Table of Contents General Introduction Glossary Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Background to Bloody www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Sunday TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX This volume is accompanied by a DVD containing the full Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 text of the report Email: [email protected] Internet: www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from £572.00 TSO Ireland 10 volumes 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD not sold Telephone: 028 9023 8451 Fax: 028 9023 5401 HC29-I separately Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Ordered by the House of Commons -
A Comparative Analysis of Artist Prints and Print Collecting at the Imperial War Museum and Australian War M
Bold Impressions: A Comparative Analysis of Artist Prints and Print Collecting at the Imperial War Museum and Australian War Memorial Alexandra Fae Walton A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University, June 2017. © Copyright by Alexandra Fae Walton, 2017 DECLARATION PAGE I declare that this thesis has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree. Except where stated otherwise by reference or acknowledgement, the work presented is entirely my own. Acknowledgements I was inspired to write about the two print collections while working in the Art Section at the Australian War Memorial. The many striking and varied prints in that collection made me wonder about their place in that museum – it being such a special yet conservative institution in the minds of many Australians. The prints themselves always sustained my interest in the topic, but I was also fortunate to have guidance and assistance from a number of people during my research, and to make new friends. Firstly, I would like to say thank you to my supervisors: Dr Peter Londey who gave such helpful advice on all my chapters, and who saw me through the final year of the PhD; Dr Kylie Message who guided and supported me for the bulk of the project; Dr Caroline Turner who gave excellent feedback on chapters and my final oral presentation; and also Dr Sarah Scott and Roger Butler who gave good advice from a prints perspective. Thank you to Professor Joan Beaumont, Professor Helen Ennis and Professor Diane Davis from the Australian National University (ANU) for making the time to discuss my thesis with me, and for their advice. -
The East German Army; the Second Power in the Warsaw Pact
ROUTLEDGE LIBRARY EDITIONS: COLD WAR SECURITY STUDIES Volume 23 THEEAST EAST GERMAN GERMAN ARMY ARMY THEEAST EAST GERMAN GERMAN ARMY ARMY The Second Power in the Warsaw Pact THOMAS M. FORSTER With an Introduction by General Sir Harry Tuzo, G.C.B., O.B.E., M.C., M.A. Translated by Deryck Viney I~ ~~o~:~!n~~~up LONDON AND NEW YORK First published in Great Britain in 1980 by George Allen & Unwin, Ltd. This edition first published in 2021 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 1980 Markus-Verlag Kln All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 978-0-367-56630-2 (Set) ISBN: 978-1-00-312438-2 (Set) (ebk) ISBN: 978-0-367-60971-9 (Volume 23) (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-00-310273-1 (Volume 23) (ebk) Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. -
Defense at the Forward Edge of the Battle Or Rather in the Depth? Different Approaches to Implement NATO’S Operation Plans by the Alliance Partners, 1955-1988
Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 15, ISSUE 3, 2014 Studies Defense at the Forward Edge of the Battle or rather in the Depth? Different approaches to implement NATO’s operation plans by the alliance partners, 1955-1988 LTC Helmut R. Hammerich Military historians love studying battles. For this purpose, they evaluate operation plans and analyze how these plans were executed on the battlefield. The battle history of the Cold War focuses first and foremost on the planning for the nuclear clash between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Although between 1945 and 1989-90 the world saw countless hot wars on the periphery of the Cold War, the “Cold World War,” as the German historian Jost Dülffer termed it, is best examined through the operational plans of the military alliances for what would have been World War Three. To conduct such an analysis we must consider Total War under nuclear conditions. Analyzing the war planning, however, is far from easy. The main difficulty lies in access to the files. The records of both the Warsaw Pact and NATO are still largely classified and therefore relatively inaccessible. Nor is access to the archives in Moscow two decades after glasnost and perestroika at all encouraging. At the request of historians, NATO has begun to declassify some of its key documents. Nonetheless, the specific details of the nuclear operational planning will continue to remain inaccessible to historians for the foreseeable future. As an alternative, historians then are forced to rely on collateral documents in the various national archives or on the compilations of ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2014 ISSN : 1488-559X VOLUME 15, ISSUE 3, 2014 diverse oral history projects. -
1 Introduction 1
Notes 1 Introduction 1. A debate exists whether a ‘Second Cold War’ did in fact break out or whether this merely a changing phase of the ongoing Cold War. This changing situation in East-West relations from the late 1970s onwards will henceforth, be referred to as the Second Cold War. See, for example, Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (London: Verso Editions and NLB, second edition, 1986). 2. Private discussions. In 1979 only 2 per cent of the electorate thought defence was a major issue in the election. By 1983 this had risen to 38 per cent. Michael Heseltine, ‘The United Kingdom’s Strategic Interests and Priorities’, RUSI Journal, vol. 128, no. 4, December 1983, pp. 3–5, p. 3. The 1983 election campaign was noteworthy for the action of the previous Labour Prime Minister, James Callaghan, who took the unprecedented step of repudiating his own party’s defence policy; Ian Aitken, ‘Callaghan Wrecks Polaris Repairs’, Guardian, 26 May 1983; Peter M. Jones, ‘British Defence Policy: the Breakdown of the Inter-party Consensus’, Review of International Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, April 1987, pp. 111–31; Bruce George and Curt Pawlisch, ‘Defence and 1983 Election’, ADIU Report, vol. 5, no. 4, July/August 1983, p. 2; Michael Heseltine, Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2000), p. 250. 3. Peter Calvocoressi, ‘Deterrence, the Costs, the Issues, the Choices’, Sunday Times, 6 April 1980. 4. Nicholas J. Wheeler, ‘Perceptions of the Soviet Threat’, in British Security Policy: the Thatcher Years and the End of the Cold War, edited by Stuart Croft (London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991), p. -
Andrew Dorman Michael D. Kandiah and Gillian Staerck ICBH Witness
edited by Andrew Dorman Michael D. Kandiah and Gillian Staerck ICBH Witness Seminar Programme The Nott Review The ICBH is grateful to the Ministry of Defence for help with the costs of producing and editing this seminar for publication The analysis, opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the JSCSC, the UK Ministry of Defence, any other Government agency or the ICBH. ICBH Witness Seminar Programme Programme Director: Dr Michael D. Kandiah © Institute of Contemporary British History, 2002 All rights reserved. This material is made available for use for personal research and study. We give per- mission for the entire files to be downloaded to your computer for such personal use only. For reproduction or further distribution of all or part of the file (except as constitutes fair dealing), permission must be sought from ICBH. Published by Institute of Contemporary British History Institute of Historical Research School of Advanced Study University of London Malet St London WC1E 7HU ISBN: 1 871348 72 2 The Nott Review (Cmnd 8288, The UK Defence Programme: The Way Forward) Held 20 June 2001, 2 p.m. – 6 p.m. Joint Services Command and Staff College Watchfield (near Swindon), Wiltshire Chaired by Geoffrey Till Paper by Andrew Dorman Seminar edited by Andrew Dorman, Michael D. Kandiah and Gillian Staerck Seminar organised by ICBH in conjunction with Defence Studies, King’s College London, and the Joint Service Command and Staff College, Ministry of -
Aldenhamiana No 23 October 2001
Aldenhamiana No 23 October 2001 Published byTHE OLD ALDENHAMIAN SOCIETY Aldenham School, Elstree, Hertfordshire WD6 3AJ, England e-mail: [email protected] www.oldaldenhamian.org ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PRESIDENT'S LETTER Finally, I must send the thanks of the Society to Lindy Creedy who served us so well for many years, and welcome in her place Molly I find myself writing this letter in the aftermath of the horrendous Barton whose husband, Trevor, has most helpfully taken over as Editor terrorist attacks on the United States on 11th September which, in turn, of Aldenhamiana. led to the postponement of the Society’s Committee Meeting which was eventually held a week later than intended, on 18th September. I hope to see many of you at the events that are now being arranged for the months ahead. Dick Vincent That delayed meeting of your Committee considered some of the more significant business in recent years on behalf of active and interested OAs, including the recommended revision of our membership and EDITOR’S NOTES subscription arrangements, which will be put to the next AGM for formal approval in Tallow Chandlers Hall, London, at 5.00pm on 9th This is my first edition of Aldenhamiana as Editor. For those of you April 2002. who do not know me, I was in Kennedy’s House from 1971 to 1975, went to University, spent ten years in the Royal Navy and, after 9th April 2002 will also mark precisely the centenary of the formation changing career and some years living abroad, have now moved back of the OA Society and at our recent Committee meeting we agreed a with my family to live locally and to work in London. -
Ucin1070571375.Pdf (2.43
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DATE: November 10, 2003 I, Craig T. Cobane II , hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy in: Political Science It is entitled: Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience Approved by: Richard Harknett James Stever Thomas Moore Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Sciences 2003 by Craig T. Cobane II B.S., University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 1990 M.A., University of Cincinnati 1992 Committee Chair: Richard J. Harknett, Ph.D. Abstract The British Government has been engaged for more than thirty years in a struggle with terrorism related to Northern Ireland. During what is euphemistically called the Troubles, the British government has implemented a series of special emergency laws to address the violence. Drawing upon the political context and debate surrounding the implementation and development of the emergency legislation this research examines the overall effect of British anti-terrorism legislation on both respect for civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight campaigns of violence. Drawing heavily upon primary sources, high profile cases of miscarriages of justice and accusation of an official ‘shoot to kill’ policy this project explores three distinct areas related to a government’s balancing of the exigencies of individual liberty and societal order. -
On Behalf of Those Who Were Killed Or Injured in the Mcgurk's Bar Massacre 4Th December 1971 Written Testimony of Ciarán
On Behalf of Those Who Were Killed or Injured in the McGurk’s Bar Massacre 4th December 1971 Written Testimony of Ciarán McAirt Hearing by the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (U.S. Helsinki Commission) "Northern Ireland: Why Justice in Individual Cases Matters" March 16, 2011 The families are grateful to this honourable Commission for allowing us to submit written evidence to its hearing on “Northern Ireland: Why Justice in Individual Cases Matters”. We humbly request that this longer testimony be written into the record. My name is Ciarán MacAirt and I am the grandson of John and Kathleen Irvine. On the 4th December 1971, my grandparents were enjoying a quiet drink with old friends, Edward and Sarah Keenan, in a snug of a family-run bar in north Belfast. The chat was lively as Edward had just received his retirement money after lifelong work in the docks. Christmas was just three weeks away and the old couple had big surprises planned for their family. McGurk’s Bar was a cosy establishment, passed from father to son, which was frequented by those members of the north Belfast community who were more interested in a punt or a pint rather than the sectarian politics of the day. Indeed, Patrick and Philomena McGurk, the owners of the pub, were renowned for their intolerance of bigotry and prejudice. The clientele naturally reflected this. As the family home was in the rooms upstairs, Mr. And Mrs. McGurk had created an environment that was not only fitting for a well-run pub, but also one that was appropriate for the raising of their children. -
BRITISH COUNTERINSURGENCY in CYPRUS, ADEN, and NORTHERN IRELAND Brian Drohan a Dissertation Submitted to the Facu
RIGHTS AT WAR: BRITISH COUNTERINSURGENCY IN CYPRUS, ADEN, AND NORTHERN IRELAND Brian Drohan A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Susan D. Pennybacker Wayne E. Lee Klaus Larres Cemil Aydin Michael C. Morgan © 2016 Brian Drohan ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Brian Drohan: Rights at War: British Counterinsurgency in Cyprus, Aden, and Northern Ireland (Under the direction of Susan D. Pennybacker) This study analyzes the role of human rights activism during three post-1945 British counterinsurgency campaigns in Cyprus (1955-1959), Aden (1963-1967), and the Northern Ireland “Troubles” (emphasizing 1969-1976). Based on material gathered from 15 archives in four countries as well as oral history records and personal papers, this study demonstrates that human rights activism shaped British operational decisions during each of these conflicts. Activists mobilized ideas of human rights to restrain counterinsurgency violence by defining certain British actions as illegal or morally unjustifiable. Although British forces often prevented activists from restraining state violence, activists forced government officials and military commanders to develop new ways of covering up human rights abuses. Focusing the analytical lens on activists and the officials with whom they interacted places rights activists on the counterinsurgency “battlefield”