DOCSLIB.ORG

(Insecta: Diptera) in the National Park Donau-Auen 1-80

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Insecta: Diptera) in the National Park Donau-Auen 1-80 ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nationalpark Donauauen - Wissenschaftliche Reihe Jahr/Year: 2013 Band/Volume: 28 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zittra Carina Artikel/Article: Species inventory, ecology and seasonal distribution patterns of Culicidae (Insecta: Diptera) in the National Park Donau-Auen 1-80 ©Nationalpark Donau-Auen GmbH, download www.biologiezentrum.at Heft 28/2013 Species inventory, ecology and seasonal distribution patterns of Culicidae (Insecta: Diptera) in the National Park Donau-Auen Die Stechmückenfauna (Culicidae) des Augebietes bei Orth an der Donau wurde 2011 erhoben um die ökologischen Ansprüche der Stechmücken an ihre Bruthabitate zu untersuchen und die Lebenszyklen der abundanten Arten zu rekon- struieren. Carina Zittra ©Nationalpark Donau-Auen GmbH, download www.biologiezentrum.at 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Material and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Study area ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sampling sites ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1. Fadenbach (F1, F2 and F3) ..................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Große Binn and Kleine Binn (GB1, KB1 and KB2) .................................................................. 9 2.2.3. Wachtelgraben .................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.4 Tree Holes (PT1-PT6) ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2.5 Temporary stagnant water bodies (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5) .................................................. 14 2.3.2 Artificial Pond ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Methods and sampling design .................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1 Sampling design and preservation of Culicidae .................................................................... 18 2.3.2 Sampling design of habitat parameters ............................................................................... 19 2.3.3 Laboratory rearings .............................................................................................................. 19 2.3.4. Measurement of head capsule width and body length ...................................................... 19 2.3.4. Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Identification of Culicidae ............................................................................................................ 20 2.4.1. Standard identification characteristics of mosquito larvae ................................................ 20 3.4.2. Standard characteristics of pupal mosquitoes .................................................................... 22 3.4.3. Standard characteristics of immature males and females .................................................. 23 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Species inventory, abundance and phenology ............................................................................ 25 3.1.1 Anopheles maculipennis complex ........................................................................................ 26 3.1.2 Anopheles (Anopheles) plumbeus (Stephens 1828) ............................................................. 27 3.1.3 Aedes (Aedes) cinereus (Meigen 1818)/ rossicus (Dolbeskin, Goritzkaja & Mitrofanova 1930) (Figure 19) ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.1.4. Aedes (Aedimorphus) vexans (Meigen 1830) ...................................................................... 29 3.1.5 Ochlerotatus (Finlaya) geniculatus (Olivier 1791) ................................................................ 29 3.1.6 Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) cantans (Meigen 1818) /annulipes (Meigen 1830) ................ 31 3.1.7 Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) cataphylla (Dyar 1916) ........................................................... 32 3.1.8 Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) excrucians (Walker 1856) ....................................................... 32 3.1.9 Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) flavescens (Müller 1764) ........................................................ 32 3.1.10 Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) sticticus (Meigen 1838) ........................................................ 33 ©Nationalpark Donau-Auen GmbH, download www.biologiezentrum.at 2 3.1.11 Ochlerotatus (Rusticoidus) rusticus (Rossi 1790) ............................................................... 33 3.1.12 Culex (Culex) pipiens (Linnaeus 1785) ................................................................................ 33 3.1.13 Culex (Neoculex) territans (Walker 1856)........................................................................... 34 3.1.14 Culiseta sp. (Felt 1904) ....................................................................................................... 35 3.1.15 Coquilletidia (Coquilletidia) richiardii (Ficalbi 1889) ........................................................... 36 3.2 Life cycles ..................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Microhabitat characteristics ........................................................................................................ 42 4. Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 49 4.1 Sampling methods ....................................................................................................................... 49 4.2 Species inventory, abundance and phenology ............................................................................ 50 4.4 Life cycles ..................................................................................................................................... 52 4.5 Microhabitat characteristics ........................................................................................................ 54 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 59 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................................. 60 References ............................................................................................................................................. 61 Index of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... 74 Index of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... 75 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................ 77 Tables ................................................................................................................................................ 77 ©Nationalpark Donau-Auen GmbH, download www.biologiezentrum.at 3 1. Introduction More than 3,500 mosquito species have been recorded worldwide and more than 40 species are known to be endemic in central Europe (Becker et al. 2010). In Austria, the Culicidae inventory consists of 39 published species belonging to 6 genera (Aedes, Anopheles, Culex, Coquillettidia, Culiseta and Uranotaenia) (Mohrig & Car 2002); since then three further species (Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) nigrinus (Eckstein 1918), Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse 1894) and Anopheles (Anopheles) hyrcanus (Pallas 1771)) were reported by Seidel 2012) and Walter (2011). Culicidae are endopterygotic insects belonging to insect order Diptera. They are divided into two subfamilies: Anophelinae and Culicinae (Fauna Europaea, 2011). Culicidae are mainly known as vectors for many medically important pathogens and parasites like viruses, bacteria, protozoans and nematodes and as transmitters of diseases like malaria, chikungunya, dengue and west nile fever and filariaris, among others (Eldridge & Edman 2000; Clements 2012; Becker et al. 2010). After the disappearance of endemic malaria in Austria in 1950 (Wernsdorfer 2002), there was a lack of interest in mosquito research, both in medical and natural sciences, although potentially culicid malaria vectors like Anopheles (Anopheles) maculipennis and Anopheles (Anopheles) claviger (Wernsdorfer 2002) are still present in Austria. Mosquito species distribution patterns and their ecology gain importance again, because global change favours the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of the Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) of Bangladesh Seth R
    Irish et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:559 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1848-z RESEARCH Open Access A review of the mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) of Bangladesh Seth R. Irish1*, Hasan Mohammad Al-Amin2, Mohammad Shafiul Alam2 and Ralph E. Harbach3 Abstract Background: Diseases caused by mosquito-borne pathogens remain an important source of morbidity and mortality in Bangladesh. To better control the vectors that transmit the agents of disease, and hence the diseases they cause, and to appreciate the diversity of the family Culicidae, it is important to have an up-to-date list of the species present in the country. Original records were collected from a literature review to compile a list of the species recorded in Bangladesh. Results: Records for 123 species were collected, although some species had only a single record. This is an increase of ten species over the most recent complete list, compiled nearly 30 years ago. Collection records of three additional species are included here: Anopheles pseudowillmori, Armigeres malayi and Mimomyia luzonensis. Conclusions: While this work constitutes the most complete list of mosquito species collected in Bangladesh, further work is needed to refine this list and understand the distributions of those species within the country. Improved morphological and molecular methods of identification will allow the refinement of this list in years to come. Keywords: Species list, Mosquitoes, Bangladesh, Culicidae Background separation of Pakistan and India in 1947, Aslamkhan [11] Several diseases in Bangladesh are caused by mosquito- published checklists for mosquito species, indicating which borne pathogens. Malaria remains an important cause of were found in East Pakistan (Bangladesh).
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae) in Southern Iran Accepted: 07-02-2017
    International Journal of Mosquito Research 2017; 4(2): 27-38 ISSN: 2348-5906 CODEN: IJMRK2 IJMR 2017; 4(2): 27-38 Larval habitats, affinity and diversity indices of © 2017 IJMR Received: 06-01-2017 Culicinae (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern Iran Accepted: 07-02-2017 Ahmad-Ali Hanafi-Bojd Ahmad-Ali Hanafi-Bojd, Moussa Soleimani-Ahmadi, Sara Doosti and Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, Shahyad Azari-Hamidian School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Abstract Tehran, Iran. An investigation was carried out studying the ecology of the larvae of Culicinae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Moussa Soleimani-Ahmadi Bashagard County, Hormozgan Province, southern Iran. Larval habitat characteristics were recorded Social Determinants in Health according to habitat situation and type, vegetation, sunlight situation, substrate type, turbidity and water Promotion Research Center, depth during 2009–2011. Physicochemical parameters of larval habitat waters were analyzed for Hormozgan University of electrical conductivity (µS/cm), total alkalinity (mg/l), turbidity (NTU), total dissolved solids (mg/l), Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, total hardness (mg/l), acidity (pH), water temperature (°C) and ions such as calcium, chloride, Iran. magnesium and sulphate. In total, 1479 third- and fourth-instar larvae including twelve species representing four genera were collected and identified: Aedes vexans, Culex arbieeni, Cx. Sara Doosti bitaeniorhynchus, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. sinaiticus, Cx. theileri, Cx. Department of Medical tritaeniorhynchus, Culiseta longiareolata, Ochlerotatus caballus and Oc. caspius. All species, except Cx. Entomology and Vector Control, bitaeniorhynchus, were reported for the first time in Bashagard County. Culiseta longiareolata (37.5%), School of Public Health, Tehran Cx.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Alaska
    LIBRAR Y ■JRD FEBE- Î961 THE U. s. DtPÁ¡<,,>^iMl OF AGidCÜLl-yí MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U < The purpose of this handbook is to present information on the biology, distribu- tion, identification, and control of the species of mosquitoes known to occur in Alaska. Much of this information has been published in short papers in various journals and is not readily available to those who need a comprehensive treatise on this subject ; some of the material has not been published before. The information l)r()UKlit together here will serve as a guide for individuals and communities that have an interest and responsibility in mosquito problems in Alaska. In addition, the military services will have considerable use for this publication at their various installations in Alaska. CuUseta alaskaensis, one of the large "snow mosquitoes" that overwinter as adults and emerge from hiber- nation while much of the winter snow is on the ground. In some localities this species is suJBBciently abundant to cause serious annoy- ance. THE MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA By C. M. GJULLIN, R. I. SAILER, ALAN STONE, and B. V. TRAVIS Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1961 For «ale by the Superintendent of Document«. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 45 cent» Contents Page Page History of mosquito abundance Biology—Continued and control 1 Oviposition 25 Mosquito literature 3 Hibernation 25 Economic losses 4 Surveys of the mosquito problem. 25 Mosquito-control organizations 5 Mosquito surveys 25 Life history 5 Engineering surveys 29 Eggs_".
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson-Nicola Regional District Nuisance Mosquito
    THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT NUISANCE MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM 2011 YEAR-END REPORT Prepared by: ___________________________ Burke Phippen, BSc., RPBio. Project Manager ___________________________ Cheryl Phippen, BSc., RN Field Coordinator NOVEMBER, 2011 BWP CONSULTING INC. 6211 Meadowland C res S, Kamloops, BC V2C 6X3 2011 Thompson-Nicola Regional District Mosquito Control Program Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM ................................. 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1. SNOW PACK .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1. TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION .......................................................................... 7 2.2. FLOW LEVELS ............................................................................................................ 9 3.0 LARVICIDING PROGRAM ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH
    SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU I INSTITUT RUĐER BOŠKOVI Ć, ZAGREB Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij ZAŠTITA PRIRODE I OKOLIŠA Ana Kurbalija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD MEĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Specijalistički rad Osijek, 2012. TEMELJNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Specijalistički rad Institit Ruđer Boškovi ć, Zagreb Poslijediplomski sveučilišni interdisciplinarni specijalisti čki studij zaštita prirode i okoliša Znanstveno područje: Prirodne znanosti Znanstveno polje: Biologija PREGLED ENTOMOFAUNE MOČVARNIH STANIŠTA OD ME ĐUNARODNOG ZNAČENJA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ Ana Kurbalija Rad je izrađen na Odjelu za biologiju, Sveučilišta Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Mentor: izv.prof. dr. sc. Stjepan Krčmar U ovom radu je istražen kvalitativni sastav entomof aune na četiri močvarna staništa od me đunarodnog značenja u Republici Hrvatskoj. To su Park prirode Kopački rit, Park prirode Lonjsko polje, Delta rijeke Neretve i Crna Mlaka. Glavni cilj specijalističkog rada je objediniti sve objavljene i neobjavljene podatke o nalazima vrsta kukaca na ova četiri močvarna staništa te kvalitativno usporediti entomofau nu pomoću Sörensonovog indexa faunističke sličnosti. Na području Parka prirode Kopački rit utvrđeno je ukupno 866 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 84 porodice i 513 rodova. Na području Parka prirode Lonjsko polje utvrđeno je 513 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 24 porodice i 89 rodova. Na području delte rijeke Neretve utvrđeno je ukupno 348 vrsta kukaca razvrstanih u 89 porodica i 227 rodova. Za područje Crne Mlake nije bilo dostupne literature o nalazima kukaca. Velika vrijednost Sörensonovog indexa od 80,85% ukazuje na veliku faunističku sličnost između faune obada Kopačkoga rita i Lonjskoga polja. Najmanja sličnost u fauni obada utvrđena je između močvarnih staništa Lonjskog polja i delte rijeke Neretve, a iznosi 41,37%.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Mosquitoes
    Chapter 2 Biology of Mosquitoes Regarding their special adaptational mechanisms, as rain-water drums, tyres, cemetery vases, small clay mosquitoes are capable of thriving in a variety of envi- pots, etc. ronments. There is hardly any aquatic habitat anywhere Furthermore, their capacity to adapt to various in the world that does not lend itself as a breeding site climatic factors or changing environmental conditions for mosquitoes. They colonise the temporary and per- is fascinating. For instance, Ae. albopictus, the Asian manent, highly polluted as well as clean, large and tiger mosquito is originally a tropical species. In the small water bodies; even the smallest accumulations course of a climate-related evolutionary adaption it such as water-filled buckets, flower vases, tyres, hoof developed a photoperiodic sensitivity. When days are prints and leaf axes are potential sources. shorter, the photoperiodically sensitive female inhabit- In temporarily flooded areas, along rivers or lakes ing a temperate climate, lays eggs that are different with water fluctuations, floodwater mosquitoes such as from the eggs that she lays when days are longer. Eggs Aedes vexans or Ochlerotatus sticticus develop in large laid during shorter days, are dormant and do not hatch numbers and with a flight range of several miles, until the following season, ensuring the species’ sur- become a tremendous nuisance even in places located vival through the winter. far away from their breeding sites (Mohrig 1969; This ability to adapt to moderate climatic condi- Becker and Ludwig 1981; Schäfer et al. 1997). tions and the fact that the eggs are resistant to desic- In swampy woodlands, snow-melt mosquitoes such cation and survive for more than a year, including the as Oc.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 4537-4605; doi:10.3390/ijerph9124537 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Article North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control Jorge R. Rey 1,*, William E. Walton 2, Roger J. Wolfe 3, C. Roxanne Connelly 1, Sheila M. O’Connell 1, Joe Berg 4, Gabrielle E. Sakolsky-Hoopes 5 and Aimlee D. Laderman 6 1 Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory and Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida-IFAS, Vero Beach, FL 342962, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (S.M.O.C.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Franklin, CT 06254, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Biohabitats, Inc., 2081 Clipper Park Road, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project, Yarmouth Port, MA 02675, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-772-778-7200 (ext. 136). Received: 11 September 2012; in revised form: 21 November 2012 / Accepted: 22 November 2012 / Published: 10 December 2012 Abstract: Wetlands are valuable habitats that provide important social, economic, and ecological services such as flood control, water quality improvement, carbon sequestration, pollutant removal, and primary/secondary production export to terrestrial and aquatic food chains. There is disagreement about the need for mosquito control in wetlands and about the techniques utilized for mosquito abatement and their impacts upon wetlands ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae) in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran
    International Journal of Epidemiologic Research Archivedoi:10.34172/ijer.2020.15 of SID 2020 Spring;7(2):74-91 http://ijer.skums.ac.ir Original Article Vertical Distribution, Biodiversity, and Some Selective Aspects of the Physicochemical Characteristics of the Larval Habitats of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran Seyed-Mohammad Omrani1* ID , Shahyad Azari-Hamidian2 ID 1Medical Parasitology Department, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran. 2Department of Health Education, Research Center of Health and Environment, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. *Corresponding Author: Abstract Dr. Seyed-Mohammad Omrani, Assistant Professor, Background and aims: Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are still a focus of research because of their role Medical Parasitology in the transmission of diseases and annoying biting behavior. Source reduction is an effective measure Department, Shahrekord to control mosquito populations, which is based on good knowledge of larval habitats. This study was University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, conducted to obtain that basic knowledge in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Iran, P.O. Box: 3391, Methods: This study was carried out in 2011 and 2012. Geographical coordinates, altitude, pH, Shahrekord, Iran, Tel: 0098 383 33335635, E-mail: temperature, and the dissolved oxygen level of larval habitats were recorded by relevant devices, [email protected] followed by documenting physical attributes by direct observation. In addition, the indices of biodiversity were calculated to analyze the vertical biodiversity of species. Finally, the affinity index was calculated to elucidate species co-occurrence. Received: 17 Mar. 2020 Results: Eighteen species were recovered from 92 larval habitats. Low- (≤ 1400 m), mid- (1401–2000 Accepted: 18 May 2020 ePublished: 28 June 2020 m), and high- (≥ 2001 m) altitudes lodged 7, 17, and 14 species, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Mosquitoes in Tribe Aedini 925
    FORUM Classification of Mosquitoes in Tribe Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae): Paraphylyphobia, and Classification Versus Cladistic Analysis HARRY M. SAVAGE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, P.O. Box 2087, Fort Collins, CO 80522 J. Med. Entomol. 42(6): 923Ð927 (2005) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/42/6/923/886357 by guest on 29 September 2021 ABSTRACT Many mosquito species are important vectors of human and animal diseases, and others are important nuisance species. To facilitate communication and information exchange among pro- fessional groups interested in vector-borne diseases, it is essential that a stable nomenclature be maintained. For the Culicidae, easily identiÞable genera based on morphology are an asset. Major changes in generic concept, the elevation of 32 subgenera within Aedes to generic status, and changes in hundreds of species names proposed in a recent article demand consideration by all parties interested in mosquito-borne diseases. The entire approach to Aedini systematics of these authors was ßawed by an inordinate fear of paraphyletic taxa or Paraphylyphobia, and their inability to distinguish between classiÞcation and cladistic analysis. Taxonomists should refrain from making taxonomic changes based on preliminary data, and they should be very selective in assigning generic names to only the most important and well-deÞned groups of species. KEY WORDS Aedini classiÞcation, Aedes, Ochlerotatus, paraphylyphobia, mosquito classiÞcation MANY MOSQUITO SPECIES IN the tribe Aedini, a cosmo- In this communication, I brießy review taxonomic politan group represented by 11 genera and Ϸ1,239 categories in a zoological classiÞcation, the Interna- species, are important vectors of human and animal tional Code of Zoological Nomenclature (the Code), diseases, and many others are of considerable eco- the development of generic concept within the Cu- nomic importance as nuisance or pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • A New European Mosquito Species: Culex
    L-~------- I European Mosquito Bulletin, 15 (2003), 6-11. ! f Journal of the European Mosquito Control Association ISSN1460-6127 A new European mosqnito species: Culex (Neoculex) ellTOpaelIS (Dipten: Culicidae) Helena Da Cunha Ramos1• 2, Henrique Ribeiro1 and Bruce A Harrison3 lUnidade de Entomologia Medica, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Jmqueira, 96, 1349-008 Lisboa, portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Centro de Zoologia, Instituto de Investiga~o Cientitica Tropical, Jmqueira, 14, 1349-008 Lisboa, portugal. 3 Public Health Pest Management Section, North Carolina Depanment of Environment and Natural Resources, 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27107, USA. Abstnet The male, female, larva and pupa of Culex (Neoculex) europaeus, sp. novo are described on the basis of the examination of material from Portugal and comparison with reared specimens of Culex (Neoculex) territans from North Carolina, USA. The recognition of the new taxon is discussed and diagnostic identitication keys to the male and female genitalia and pupa are provided. Introduction Culex te"itans Walker was described from the "United States" (Walker, 1856), but the type locality was restricted later to Charlestoo (Charleston County), South Carolina, by Belkin et al. (1966). Furthermore, Belkin (1%8) was mable to locate the type specimen of Cx. te"itans and consida'ed it "presmnably lost" and non-extent. Sirivanakam (1971) considered Cx. te"itans the most widely spread member of the subgenus Neoculex Dyar, since it occurs in both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. In North America, ex. te"itans has a very wide distribution to include parts of Alaska and Canada, and most of the contiguous United States except for several southwestern states (Darsie & Ward, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Paper
    UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA Doctoral School of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences and Department of Limnology The ecology of mosquito and sandfly vectors and their pathogens in a changing environment A szúnyog, lepkeszúnyog vektorok és patogénjeik ökológiája a változó környezetben DOI: Supervisor Prof Dr Judit Padisák DSc, institute director professor, University of Pannonia, Department of Limnology; research group leader, MTA-PE, Limnoecology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Ph.D. Dissertation Dr Attila János Trájer 2019 The ecology of mosquito and sandfly vectors and their pathogens in a changing environment A szúnyog, lepkeszúnyog vektorok és patogénjeik ökológiája a változó környezetben Készült a Pannon Egyetem Kémiai és Környezettudományi Doktori Iskolája keretében Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Padisák Judit Elfogadásra javaslom (igen / nem) ............................ (aláírás) A jelölt a doktori szigorlaton ........%-ot ért el, Az értekezést bírálóként elfogadásra javaslom: Bíráló neve: …………………………. igen / nem ............................ (aláírás) Bíráló neve: …………………………. igen / nem ............................ (aláírás) A jelölt az értekezés nyilvános vitáján .............%-ot ért el. Veszprém, ……………………….... ............................... a Bíráló Bizottság elnöke A doktori (PhD) oklevél minősítése.................................... .............................. Az EDHT elnöke ABBREVIATIONS AGCC Anthropogenic Global Climate Change IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change THB(s) thermal bridge(s) UI Urbanisation Intensity
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Mosquito Fauna of Southeast Asia II
    ILLUSTRATED KEYS TO THE GENERA OF MOSQUITOES1 BY Peter F. Mattingly 2 INTRODUCTION The suprageneric and generic classification adopted here follow closely the Synoptic Catalog of the Mosquitoes of the World (Stone et al. , 1959) and the various supplements (Stone, 1961, 1963, 1967,’ 1970). Changes in generic no- menclature arising from the publication of the Catalog include the substitution of Mansonia for Taeniorhynchus and Culiseta for Theobaldiu, bringing New and Old World practice into line, the substitution of Toxorhynchites for Megarhinus and MaZaya for Harpagomyia, the suppression of the diaeresis in Aties, A&deomyia (formerly Atiomyia) and Paraties (Christophers, 1960b) and the inclusion of the last named as a subgenus of Aedes (Mattingly, 1958). The only new generic name to appear since the publication of the Catalog is Galindomyiu (Stone & Barreto, 1969). Mimomyia, previously treated as a subgenus of Ficalbia, is here treated, in combination with subgenera Etorleptiomyia and Rauenulites, as a separate genus. Ronderos & Bachmann (1963a) proposed to treat Mansonia and Coquillettidia as separate genera and they have been fol- lowed by Stone (1967, 1970) and others. I cannot accept this and they are here retained in the single genus Mansonia. It will be seen that the treatment adopted here, as always with mosquitoes since the early days, is conservative. Inevitably, therefore, dif- fictiIties arise in connection with occasional aberrant species. In order to avoid split, or unduly prolix, couplets I have preferred, in nearly every case, to deal with these in the Notes to the Keys. The latter are consequently to be regarded as very much a part of the keys themselves and should be constantly borne in mind.
    [Show full text]