DOCSLIB.ORG

Highway Location As a Factor in Regional Development in Areas Adjacent to National Parks: a Case Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highway Location As a Factor in Regional Development in Areas Adjacent to National Parks: a Case Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1968 Highway Location as a Factor in Regional Development in Areas Adjacent to National Parks: A Case Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region Carl Rowan Leathers University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Leathers, Carl Rowan, "Highway Location as a Factor in Regional Development in Areas Adjacent to National Parks: A Case Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1968. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3264 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Carl Rowan Leathers entitled "Highway Location as a Factor in Regional Development in Areas Adjacent to National Parks: A Case Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Architecture. Aelred J. Gray, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Walter L. Shouse Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) May 17 , 1967 To the G�aduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis wr itten by Carl Rowan Leathers entitled "�ighway Location as a Factor in Regional Development . in Areas Adjacent to .National.Parks : A Case. Study of the Great Smoky Mountains National · Park Region ." I recommend that it be accepted for nine quarter hours of c�edit in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the ,degree of Master ·of . Science in Planning. We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: HIGHWAY LO CAT ION AS A FAC TOR IN REG IO NAL DE VELOPMENT IN AR EAS ADJACENT TO NAT IONAL . PAR KS : A CASE ST UDY .OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NAT IO NAL PARK REG ION A Th esis Presented to. th e Graduate Council of . Th e Un iversity of Tenne ssee In.Part ial Fulfillm ent of the Requirements for.the Degree . Ma st er of Sc ience in Pl ann ing .a by Ca rl Rowan Leathers August 196 8 . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his gratitude to . Mr . Walter L. Shouse, Director , and the faculty of the Graduate School of Planning. at The University_of-Tennessee, for the opportunity to pursue graduate work . Appreciation is also extended to M�. Aelred J. Gray whose patience , insight , and .helpful suggestions.were invaluable in the com­ pletion of .this study . Th� photographs used-in this thesis.were.taken by the late Harvey Broome , whose .. life .was devoted to presei!ving the splendor and beauty of this land for othei!s . To Mr� Broome .and.his wife , Anne , a special thanks . The writer is also_ grateful for the-financial support received from the.State of-Tennessee , and the encouragement of Mr . Harold v. Miller , £xecutive .Dir.ectoi!. of .the Tennessee .State PJ.anni.ng Commission , and Jack s. Cunning. , Director .. of Local Plann�ng . The writer wishes to thank.the many people who contriputed their time and knowledge in discussing the subject. _ _ ii ABSTRACT How may highways be located in regions containing a national park so as to maximize the park as a resource appropriate to the stimulation of regional development and , · at the same time , preserve . the values which the park represents? Research was conducted on the .history and purposes of th e national · park . system to determine factors,which are relevant to the establishment of ,national -parks and related areas, Available litera­ ture on the history and establishment of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park was,used . to supplement material obtained from personal interviews with various staff members of the park . The 1964 Master . Plan for the park was studied to determine a clearer picture of develop­ ment policy for the park . The history of the . development of highways and . the present , emerging , and f�ture highway,system of . the region were considered. Interviews with park administrators,were conducted and the results coordinated witb data compiled from traffic surveys by the National Park Service , the Bureau of Public Roads , and the highway,departments of Tennessee and North Carolina . Economic and · population data from · the Bureau of Census reports and other . sources were employed to present a cursory development picture of the region. iii iv Interior park planning shou).d be related .to , but not controlled by exterior forces and.iriterests . Th� key element in the sound develop­ ment of the region is a highway system designed to serve the park and the .region , and planned to preserve their scenic qualities as a whole� Because National.Park Service policy requires major accomodations to :Pe outside the park , th� highway.system must provide and encourage opportunities for commercial development within,the region. Because of the many interests involved iR .loca�i� new highways there is a need.for.some .machinery to consider .confliQts .of interest and . to prepare courses of action. It is recommended.that .· a regional council be established.composed .of representativ�s fpom the appropriat� federal , , state , and local _agencies and departments ,. which .would serve . to resolve these conflicts and coordinate . highway planning for the region . A funot�onal·classification system for highways within the region is ·proposed . TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE • • • • • . I. INTRODUCTION • ft . l Statement .of the Problem . � . 2 Limitations .and .Scope of .. the Thesis . • 3 II. THE DEVELOPMENT .OF THE NAT IONAL PARK SYSTEM IN THE ' . UNITED STATES . .•••• . 4 III. THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS N,ATIONAL PARK AND THE REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM . 13 Physical Features. of the Region . 13 Establishment .and .Histor-y of the Great Smoky Mountains . • • . National park . 15 Purpose of the park . 19 A History. of-the .Developmen� -of Highways Within the Region . • • • , • • . 20 • . Inte�state highways • , 24 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP.OF .. THE PARK.TO RE GIONAL DEVELOPMENT -· • • • 26 The Economic .Base of the Region • � . 28 Population . ' . 28 Employment . 30 Agriculture .• 30 Manuf�cturing . •• . 31 . ' . Value added·.. • .• . 32 vi CHAPTER PAGE Construction 32. Retail activity or other activity 32 . ' . Wholesale act ivity . 32 . Finance , insurance , and real estate • . 33 . Forest products . 33 Resorts ••. I I I I I f . 33 . National.park employment .••. 33 . • • . .. The. economy, of -Gatlinburg • . 34 . Other urban.centers within the . �egion . • . ••• 35' Present , Eme.rging , and .Future Traffic Pqtterns • • 36 V. FACTORS AND INTERESTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN REGIONAL . HIGHWAY LOCATION . 45 • • • • Topography and Other Natural Features • 45 .•••.• Aesthetic Considerations . 47 Interests Involved in Highway . Location . 52 . Local interests • • 52 The conservationists 52 . The general public . 53 . The nat ional interest . 53 . Highway . planning .. agencies •• . 54' Region Wide Public and Private Recreational Resources . 55. Nat ional forests 57 Tennessee Valley Authority lakes 59. vii CHAPT�R PAGE· State parks . • • • o o o • 59 Private resort developments o . 60 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . .. 61· Establishment of a Regional Council 62 A Functional Classification of Highways·Within the Region 63 Regional · connector highways 65 Parkways and.scenic highways . 65 Standavds for parkways a�d sc�nic highways . • • • • • • 67 Regional development highways 68 Development nodes . • . 68 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 70 VITA ,,....... ...., .... .... 75 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. The Region and the Major Highway System o o o 0 16 2. · An .Example of the Complex Geology of the Region o o 17 3. Location Map of the Great .Smoky Mountains National Park Showing the Major Access Routes from the Eastern . United · States • 0 . ' . 21 4, Average Daily Traffic Flow Map , 1966, Eastern Tennessee.and . ' .. Western North Carolina . 39 5o An Example ,_of Contour Realignment Resulting from Present Highway Standards and Construction Methods in.Mountainous • • • , • • , • • • • • • • • • Te:rrain, Part 1 o o o o •. o 48 6. An Example,of Contour Realignment Resulting from Present Highway Standards-and Construction Methods in Mountainous , , • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • Terrain , Part 2 o • o o 49 7 o An Example of .. Contour. Realignment Resulting from . Present Highway Standards and Construction Methods in Mountainous . " . Terrain , Part·3 o . 50 8. A Possible Functional Highway System for-Major Highways and the Location of-Development Nodes . inrthe Region . 66 viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The· nat�onal park system is one . of the important innovations in land use policy conceived and developed by the United States . It was th� first major nation to establish a system of national parks as a means of . preserving significant examples of its natural and cultural heritage for present and future generations . l The idea has been adopted · by several other nations , notably
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Data Sheets for National Park Service
    Total Project Score/Ranking: N/A NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Planned Funding FY: 2021 $14,116,000 Project Data Sheet Funding Source: Legacy Restoration Fund Project Identification Project Title: Maintenance Action Team Project Number: DOI #N001 Unit/Facility Name: Multiple Region/Area/District: Multiple Congressional District: Multiple State: Multiple Project Justification DOI Asset Code FRPP Unique Id# API: FCI-Before: N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Description: Utilizing the Legacy Restoration Fund, the NPS's Historic Preservation Training Center (HPTC) and Historic Architecture, & Engineering Center (HACE) will stand up a pilot program during FY21 consisting of Preservation Maintenance Action Teams (MATs) to complete rehabilitation and preservation projects on historic assets. These assets make up 25 percent of the NPS facility portfolio. The MAT will perform the following types of projects: preservation and stabilization of fortification masonry scarp walls; rehabilitation of masonry comfort station exteriors; battlefield monument care and maintenance; specialized repair and painting of windows in several structures at various parks; replacing roofs in-kind (ranging from wood shingle to slate); and rehabilitating culverts, trails and trail bridges, cultural landscapes and their historic features. The maintenance work will improve the condition of the asset by extending the life of the critical systems which may include components of the exterior envelope, superstructure, or interior features— ultimately preserving the cultural resource and its contents. Staff training and hands-on education will provide NPS personnel with skillsets that will last decades. Training and capacity in the traditional trades, appropriate materials selection, and treatment approaches will help parks reduce life cycle costs—especially since many assets with deteriorated conditions are the result of prior use of incompatible materials, lack of trained staff, attrition of skilled craftspeople, budget shortfalls, or a failure to prioritize preservation of the resource.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Wilderness Trail
    Trail Protecti n The Pacific Crest Trail: America’s Wilderness Trail By Mike Dawson, PCTA Trail Operations Director To maintain and defend for the enjoyment of nature lovers the PACIFIC CREST TRAILWAY as a primitive wilderness pathway in an environment of solitude, free “from the sights and sounds of a mechanically disturbed Nature. – PCT System Conference mission, appearing in many publications and at the bottom of correspondence in the 1940s Many of us make the mistake of believing that the notion of set- The concepts of preserving wilderness” and building long-distance ting aside land in its natural condition with minimal influence trails were linked from those earliest days and were seen by leaders by man’s hand or of creating long-distance trails in natural set- of the time as facets of the same grand scheme. It seems clear that Mtings began with the environmental movement of the 1960s and one of the entities developed in those days has always been the set into the national consciousness with the passage of the 1964 epitome of the connection between those movements – the Pacific Wilderness Act and the 1968 National Trails System Act. Crest National Scenic Trail. But the development of these preservation concepts predates In recent articles in the PCT Communicator, writers have talked these landmark congressional acts by 40 years. A group of revolu- about the current association between the PCT and wilderness in tionary thinkers planted the seeds of these big ideas in the 1920s, this, the 50th anniversary of the Wilderness Act. Few are aware 1930s and 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE a Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System
    A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System A PEW WILDERNESS CENTER RESEARCH REPORT A WILDERNESS-FOREVER FUTURE A Short History of the National Wilderness Preservation System DOUGLAS W. SCOTT Here is an American wilderness vision: the vision of “a wilderness- forever future.” This is not my phrase, it is Howard Zahniser’s. And it is not my vision, but the one that I inherited, and that you, too, have inherited, from the wilderness leaders who went before. A Wilderness-Forever Future. Think about that. It is It is a hazard in a movement such as ours that the core idea bound up in the Wilderness Act, which newer recruits, as we all once were, may know too holds out the promise of “an enduring resource of little about the wilderness work of earlier generations. wilderness.” It is the idea of saving wilderness forever Knowing something of the history of wilderness —in perpetuity. preservation—nationally and in your own state— is important for effective wilderness advocacy. In Perpetuity. Think of the boldness of that ambition! As Zahniser said: “The wilderness that has come to us The history of our wilderness movement and the char- from the eternity of the past we have the boldness to acter and methods of those who pioneered the work project into the eternity of the future.”1 we continue today offer powerful practical lessons. The ideas earlier leaders nurtured and the practical tools Today this goal may seem obvious and worthy, but and skills they developed are what have brought our the goal of preserving American wilderness in per- movement to its present state of achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Microfilm Edition of the Papers of Ernest Oberholtzer
    GUIDE TO THE MICROFILM EDITION of the PAPERS OF ERNEST OBERHOLTZER Gregory Kinney _~ Minnesota Historical Society '!&1l1 Division of Library and Archives 1989 Copyright © by Minnesota Historical Society The Oberholtzer Papers were microfilmed and this guide printed with funds provided by grants from the Ernest C. Oberholtzer Foundation and the Quetico-Superior Foundation. -.-- -- - --- ~?' ~:':'-;::::~. Ernest Oberholtzer in his Mallard Island house on Rainy Lake in the late 1930s. Photo by Virginia Roberts French. Courtesy Minnesota Historical Society. Map of Arrowhead Region L.a"(.e~se\"C ~ I o A' .---.....; ., ; , \~ -'\ ~ • ~ fI"" i Whitefish---- Lake Fowl Lake ~/ ~ '""'-- F . O)"~"~'t\ ~~ , .tV "" , I -r-- ~Rlucr~ v'" '" Reprinted from Saving Quetico-Superior: A Land Set Apart, by R. Newell Searle, copyright@ 1977 by the Minnesota Historical Society, Used with permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .•• INTRODUCTION. 1 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 2 ARRANGEMENT NOTE 5 SERIES DESCRIPTIONS: Biographical Information 8 Personal Correspondence and Related Papers 9 Short Stories, Essays, and Other Writings 14 Miscellaneous Notes. • • 19 Journals and Notebooks • 20 Flood Damage Lawsuit Files 34 Quetico-Superior Papers • 35 Wilderness Society Papers • 39 Andrews Family Papers •• 40 Personal and Family Memorabilia and Other Miscellany 43 ROLL CONTENTS LIST • 44 RELATED COLLECTIONS 48 PREFACE This micl'ofilm edition represents the culmination of twenty-five years of efforts to preserve the personal papers of Ernest Carl Oberholtzer, The acquisition, processing, conservation, and microfilming of the papers has been made possible through the dedicated work and generous support of the Ernest C, Oberholtzer Foundation and the members of its board. Additional grant support was received from the Quetico-Superior Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Wilderness
    INTERNATIONAL Journal of Wilderness DECEMBER 2005 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3 FEATURES SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 3 Is Eastern Wilderness ”Real”? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE ALDO LEOPOLD WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE BY REBECCA ORESKES 30 Social and Institutional Influences on SOUL OF THE WILDERNESS Wilderness Fire Stewardship 4 Florida Wilderness BY KATIE KNOTEK Working with Traditional Tools after a Hurricane BY SUSAN JENKINS 31 Wilderness In Whose Backyard? BY GARY T. GREEN, MICHAEL A. TARRANT, UTTIYO STEWARDSHIP RAYCHAUDHURI, and YANGJIAN ZHANG 7 A Truly National Wilderness Preservation System BY DOUGLAS W. SCOTT EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION 39 Changes in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters 13 Keeping the Wild in Wilderness When Is Too Much Change Unacceptable to Visitors? Minimizing Nonconforming Uses in the National Wilderness Preservation System BY JOSEPH FLOOD and CRAIG COLISTRA BY GEORGE NICKAS and KEVIN PROESCHOLDT 19 Developing Wilderness Indicators on the INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES White Mountain National Forest 42 Wilderness Conservation in a Biodiversity Hotspot BY DAVE NEELY BY RUSSELL A. MITTERMEIER, FRANK HAWKINS, SERGE RAJAOBELINA, and OLIVIER LANGRAND 22 Understanding the Cultural, Existence, and Bequest Values of Wilderness BY RUDY M. SCHUSTER, H. KEN CORDELL, and WILDERNESS DIGEST BRAD PHILLIPS 46 Announcements and Wilderness Calendar 26 8th World Wilderness Congress Generates Book Review Conservation Results 48 How Should America’s Wilderness Be Managed? BY VANCE G. MARTIN edited by Stuart A. Kallen REVIEWED BY JOHN SHULTIS FRONT COVER The magnificent El Carmen escaprment, one of the the “sky islands” of Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Patricio Robles Gil/Sierra Madre. INSET Ancient grain grinding site, Maderas del Carmen, Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Vance G.
    [Show full text]
  • 2034 Regional Mobility Plan
    2009-2034 Knoxville Regional Mobility Plan Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization 2009-2034 Knoxville Regional Mobility Plan Adopted by: East Tennessee South Rural Planning Organization on May 12, 2009 TPO Executive Board on May 27, 2009 This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation and the Tennessee Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors/ Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization expressed herein do not necessarily state or refl ect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation and Tennessee Department of Transportation. This plan was prepared by: Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization Suite 403, City County Building 400 Main Street Knoxville, TN 37902 Phone: 865-215-2500 Fax: 865-215-2068 Email: [email protected] www.knoxtrans.org 1 Acknowledgements Cover images: “Child in Car” © Charles White/Dreamstime.com “Child on Sidewalk” © Dimitrii/Dreamstime.com “Boy Watching Plane” © Wildcat78/Dreamstime.com “Kid with Bicycle” © Nanmoid/Dreamstime.com 2009-2034 Knoxville Regional Mobility Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 Purpose of the 2009 Regional Mobility Plan ......................................................................................... 7 Scope of the Plan ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highways in Harmony Grant Siijui: Y Muiiniiiinz I Jaiiau&L Fart
    The Asheville, North Carolina Chamber of Commerce NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AS In an effort to appease both wilderness advocates and DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF promoted construction of a "Skyway" along the crest of road proponents, GRSM Superintendent George Fry Highways in Harmony the Smokies in 1932. The proposed road would run along MEDIATOR proposed six smaller wilderness areas rather than the two GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS Q 1 US 5 Si^tS § < -s sit J the ridge of the mountains much like Shenandoah's The debate between road proponents and wilderness larger ones promoted by the Smoky Mountains Hiking ROADS & BRIDGES Skyline Drive. In July of that year GRSM officials advocates continued to influence road building in GRSM Club. Most importantly, Fry situated these six tracts so as Thousand of years of geological change and erosion have Grant Siijui: y announced that the Park would go ahead with this project, during the post World War II era. This is most evident in to leave a swath of undesignated land running up and over shaped the Great Smoky Mountains, which are and in November and December the Bureau of Public the controversy over the proposed Northshore Road that the crest of the Smokies to allow construction of a 32-mile characterized by high mountain peaks, steep hillsides, Muiiniiiinz Roads inspected the proposed route. was to run along Fontana Lake from Bryson City to motor road connecting Townsend, Tennessee with Bryson deep river valleys, and fertile coves. This difficult terrain Fontana Dam. According to a 1943 agreement, the City, North Carolina. This "Transmountain Highway," and underlying bedrock presented numerous challenges i Jaiiau&l Fart In response to such actions, in 1934 a local lawyer named National Park Service agreed to construct a new road Fry believed, would not only relieve congestion along for the designer of the roads in Great Smoky Mountains Harvey Broome invited Marshall and McKaye to within park boundaries along the north shore of Fontana Newfound Gap Road but would also appeal to North North Carolina, Tennessee National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Historic Resource Study Great Smoky Mountains National Park
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Service National Park Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Great Smoky Mountains NATIONAL PARK Historic Resource Study Resource Historic Park National Mountains Smoky Great Historic Resource Study | Volume 1 April 2016 VOL Historic Resource Study | Volume 1 1 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historic places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. GRSM 133/134404/A April 2016 GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 FRONT MATTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • We Engineer America's Scenic Highways
    Wrd E/icjifw&TAmerica's Scenic Highways Double Arch Bridge, Natchez Trace Parkway Williamson County, Tennessee Our Nation's first segmentallv constructed concrete arch bridge. Pastern Federal Lands • Federal Highway Administration • U.S. Department of Transportation • Sterling, Virginia 2(1166 Blue Ridge Parkway /Year Floyd, Virginia This 469-mile-long scenic parkway in Virginia and STAMP North Carolina spirals and winds ils wa\ from the valleys to the mountain tops. s- _ =• — ! £ Pastern Federal Lands • Federal Highway Administration • U.S. Department of'Transportation • Sterling. Virginia 20160 The Gatlinburg Spur, Foothills Parkway Great Smoky Mountains National Park This connector road, which proceeds through a STAMP tunnel and crosses a bridge, was reconstructed 3 ft below its former grade to improve safety. a =: I - r Eastern Federal lands • Federal I lighway Administration • U.S. Department of Transportation • Sterling, Virginia 201 f>f> Cumberland Gap Tunnel, Tennessee Portal Cumberland Cap National Historical Park This tunnel, which runs from Cumberland Gap, STAMP Tennessee, to Middlesboro, Kentucky, was constructed to permit restoration of the historic Cumberland Gap to its 17()0's appearance and to improve traffic safety. -.:•. Eastern federal Lands • federal Highway Administration • U.S. Department of Transportation • Sterling, Virginia 20166 Forehand Hollow Bridge, Natchez Trace Parkway Williamson County, Tennessee This 900-ft-long bridge rises 100 feet above the STAMP basin floor as it curves gracefully into the woodlands. B I .-•J; - < 5ft •O« ::Q.. ••:: C; £ Eastern Federal Lands • Federal Highway Administration • U.S. Department of Transportation • Sterling. Virginia 2016b Cherohala Skyway Nantahala Forest, North Carolina This picturesque forest road follows the mountain­ STAMP ous ridges of Tennessee (Cherokee National Forest) and North Carolina (Nantahala National Forest).
    [Show full text]
  • Four-Year Implementation Plan 2016
    2016 Four-Year Implementation Plan Table of Contents The Vision.............................. 1 Stakeholder Engagement........ 7 The Plan................................ 11 The Design Guide.................. 20 Funding the Plan.................... 34 Acronym Glossary: AMBC / Appalachian Mountain Bike Club TDOT / Tennessee Department of Transportation GSMNP / Great Smoky Mountains National Park UW / Urban Wilderness LPF / Legacy Parks Foundation WMA / Wildlife Management Area MOU / memorandum of understanding The Partners That Collaborated On This Plan Consultant Team THE VISION Knoxville’s Urban Wilderness 4-Year Implementation Plan 2 The Urban Wilderness is a collaborative project that is reinventing Using the Goals to Vet Projects Knoxville as one of the Southeast’s premier outdoor towns. Just Big Picture and minutes from downtown, the Urban Wilderness currently is a Vision and The goals below should be referenced in future planning, fabric of connected parks, open space, and trails with over as a “filter” through which all projects are vetted. Projects 1,000 forested acres, 50-miles of multi-purpose trails, world that will accomplish the most goals should be a priority for class mountain bike trails and a bike park, Ijams Nature Center, partners and for funding. Background rock-climbing, four Civil War sites, a Wildlife Management Area with Goals of opportunities for hunting and fishing, and several scenic quarries. Goals The Urban Wilderness—Present and The fabric of the Urban Wilderness will connect schools, the Urban Future neighborhoods, downtown, and existing and emerging businesses. It will stimulate the economy and the revitalization The Systems are Interconnected: including parks, The Knoxville Urban Wilderness represents a dynamic of South Knoxville; many of the investments will not be made by open space, trails, pedestrian/bike facilities, schools, Wilderness communities, downtown, and commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Smoky Mountains National Park 1
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Great Smoky Mountains National Park East Tennessee p79 Great Smoky Mountains North Carolina National Park Mountains p38 p109 Atlanta & North Georgia p134 Amy C Balfour, Kevin Raub, Regis St Louis, Greg Ward PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to the Great GREAT SMOKY Fontana Dam Smoky Mountains MOUNTAINS & Western National Park . 4 NATIONAL PARK . 38 North Carolina . 63 Sights & Activities . 65 Great Smoky Mountains Day Hikes . 39 National Park Map . 6 Newfound Gap Road . 39 Newfound Gap Road . 65 Great Smoky Mountains Roaring Fork Motor Cades Cove National Park’s Top 10 . .. 8 Nature Trail, & Foothills Parkway . 68 Need to Know . 14 Greenbrier Cataloochee Valley . 70 & Around Cosby . 50 What’s New . 16 Fontana Dam Cades Cove . 52 & Western If You Like . 17 Cataloochee Valley . 56 North Carolina . 71 Month by Month . 19 Additional Hikes . 58 Courses . 72 Itineraries . 22 Overnight Hikes . 59 Sleeping . 72 Outdoor Activities . 26 Newfound Gap Road . 60 Newfound Gap Road . 73 Travel with Children . 32 Around Cosby . 62 Cosby & Big Creek . 73 PERSONALPRODUCER/GETTY IMAGES © IMAGES PERSONALPRODUCER/GETTY © STAHL/500PX KIP WHITE-WATER RAFTING P31 TODD RYBURN PHOTOGRAPHY/GETTY IMAGES © IMAGES PHOTOGRAPHY/GETTY RYBURN TODD WHITE-TAILED DEER P189 Contents UNDERSTAND Cades Cove, Cherokee Great Smoky Abrams Creek National Forest . 104 Mountains & Foothills Parkway . 76 National Park Today . 174 Cataloochee Valley NORTH CAROLINA & Balsam Mountain . 76 MOUNTAINS . 109 History . 176 Fontana Dam & Western High Country . 112 Wildlife . 185 North Carolina . 76 Blowing Rock . 112 People of the Eating . 77 Boone . 115 Smoky Mountains . 190 Asheville . 117 Forests of the EAST TENNESSEE .
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquy.10.2.Pdf
    GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS Fall 2009 The panoramic photograph, below, olloquyVolume 10 • Number 2 of the Fontana area was taken by Elgin Kintner. Read more about CT h e U n i v e r s i T y o f T e n n e s s e e L i b r a r i e s Kintner and his work on page 3. Great Smoky Mountains Colloquy Rejoice but Remember is a newsletter published by FOR THE 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE The University of Tennessee GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK Libraries. a poem by Margaret Lynn Brown Co-editors: Rejoice in Anne Bridges Ken Wise 540,000 acres 75 years of National Park Service protection Correspondence and 1500 flowering plants, AND change of address: 59 years of Wildflower Pilgrims 1 GSM Colloquy But Remember 152D John C. Hodges Library Will Palmer, who rode his horse to Raleigh, The University of Tennessee to stop overfishing on Cataloochee Creek. Knoxville, TN 37996-1000 865/974-2359 My father built our cabin of oak, said Email: [email protected] Seymour Calhoun, because that’s what Web: www.lib.utk.edu/smokies/ he had to cut down to build it A fallen chestnut above Cosby so big it protected cattle from a snowstorm. Rejoice in Fringed phacilia Dutchman’s pipe vine Fiddleheads and trilliums GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS Pilgrimage veterans But Remember Ma filled her apron with poke stalks growing everywhere, said Dorie Cope, It was Nature’s garden. AMERICAN CHESTNUT (continued on page 2) REGIONAL PROJECT GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS COLLOQUY Fall 2009 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Juanita Ownby’s family used 2 Imagine if you can (wouldn’t you love to have seen it) bloodroot to dye Easter eggs red.
    [Show full text]