DOCSLIB.ORG

Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Prepared for: El Dorado Irrigation District June 2019 Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Prepared for: El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, CA 95667 Contact: Doug Venable Environmental Review Analyst (530) 642-4187 Prepared by: GEI Consultants 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 Contact: Ryan Jolley Senior Project Manager (916) 912-4942 June 2019 Project No. 1901628 El Dorado Irrigation District NOTICE OF INTENT and NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to CEQA Section 21092 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15072) CAPLES LAKE AND SILVER LAKE EAST CAMPGROUND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT The El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Code of Regulations) for the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project (project or proposed project). The project involves improvements to camping units, infrastructure, restrooms, and other facilities to meet the most current U.S. Forest Service (USFS) design and accessibility standards of the Architectural Barriers Act, at the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds. The improvements are being conducted in accordance with requirements of USFS Conditions 50.1 and 50.2 of EID’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license to operate Project No. 184. The project includes: 1) resurfacing and expanding campground roadways and parking spurs; 2) replacing, expanding, and relocating camping units; 3) replacing the potable water systems; 4) replacing restrooms and other facilities; and 5) abandoning and/or removing existing camping units, pipelines, and other facilities. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 10 months in fall 2019 and spring/summer 2020. The project site locations are not identified on the lists specified in Government Code section 65962.5 for hazardous waste sites. The project does not increase the capacity or change the existing use of the campgrounds. EID is the lead agency for the project, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and has directed the preparation of an Initial Study (IS) on the proposed project in accordance with CEQA requirements, the State CEQA Guidelines, and EID’s guidelines. This IS describes the proposed project and assesses the proposed project’s potentially significant adverse impacts on the physical environment. It concludes that the proposed project’s potentially significant or significant adverse effects on the environment could be mitigated to less-than-significant levels; therefore, a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared. Agencies and members of the public are invited to comment on the proposed IS/MND. The comment period is from June 28, 2019 to July 29, 2019. The proposed IS/MND can be reviewed at EID’s Customer Service Building, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, CA 95667 or on the EID web site at www.eid.org/ceqa. Comments can be sent to Doug Venable, EID Environmental Review Analyst, at the address above or by email at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on July 29, 2019. A public hearing to consider the IS/MND will be held on August 12, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. during a regularly scheduled meeting of the EID Board of Directors. The hearing will be in the EID Customer Service Building Board Room at the above address. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project GEI Consultants, Inc. El Dorado Irrigation District NOI-1 Notice of Intent In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California law, it is the policy of the El Dorado Irrigation District to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation for this meeting, please contact the EID ADA coordinator at 530.642.4045 or email at [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the District to make reasonable accommodations to ensure accessibility. GEI Consultants, Inc. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Notice of Intent NOI-2 El Dorado Irrigation District PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Lead Agency: El Dorado Irrigation District PROJECT LOCATION The Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds are located in Alpine and Amador counties, California, respectively. A segment of the new water supply pipeline and offsite well serving the Silver Lake East Campground is located in El Dorado County, California. The project site locations are adjacent to State Route 88, near Caples and Silver lakes. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves improvements to camping units, infrastructure, and restrooms, to meet the most current U.S. Forest Service (USFS) design and accessibility standards of the Architectural Barriers Act at the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds. The improvements are being conducted in accordance with requirements of USFS Conditions 50.1 and 50.2 of El Dorado Irrigation District’s (EID’s) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license for operation of Project No. 184. The project includes: 1) resurfacing and expanding campground roadways and parking spurs; 2) replacing, expanding, and relocating camping units; 3) replacing potable water systems; 4) replacing restrooms and other facilities; and 5) abandoning and/or removing existing camping units, pipelines, and other facilities. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 10 months in fall 2019 and spring/summer 2020. FINDINGS An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to assess the proposed project’s potential effects on the environment and the significance of those effects. Based on the IS, it has been determined that the proposed project would not result in significant adverse effects on the physical environment after implementation of mitigation measures. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: 1. The proposed project would have no impacts on land use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, and wildfire. 2. The proposed project would have less-than-significant impacts on aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, recreation, transportation, and utilities and service systems. 3. The proposed project would have potentially significant impacts on biological, Tribal and cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and hydrology and water quality, but mitigation measures are proposed to avoid or reduce these effects to less-than-significant levels. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project GEI Consultants, Inc. El Dorado Irrigation District MND-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 4. The proposed project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 5. The proposed project would not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 6. The proposed project would not have possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable and contribute to a significant cumulative impact. “Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. 7. The environmental effects of the proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Following are the proposed mitigation measures that would be implemented by EID to avoid or minimize environmental impacts. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the environmental impacts of the proposed project to less-than-significant levels. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Minimize Potential Impacts on Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog EID shall implement the following measures to minimize potential for significant adverse effects on Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog during project activities at the Silver Lake East Campground. Conduct environmental awareness training before project activities begin to inform all construction personnel about measures to avoid and minimize effects on biological resources. Install and maintain high-visibility fencing or other visual marking to protect sensitive biological resource areas (i.e., Oyster Lake and Oyster Creek) that are located adjacent to construction areas from encroachment by personnel and equipment. Incorporate sensitive habitat information into construction
Recommended publications
  • Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan

    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan

    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan PREPARED BY SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR THE California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region December 2009 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE rptfic'iii Printed on sustainable paper products COVER: Appleton Utopia Forest Stewardship Council certified by Smartwood (a Rainforest Alliance program), ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, EPA SmartWay Transport Partner Interior pages: Navigator Hybrid 85%-100% recycled post consumer waste blended with virgin fiber, Forest Stewarship Council certified chain of custody, ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, 80% energy from renewable resources Divider pages (main body): Domtar Colors Sustainable Forest Initiative fiber sourcing certified, 30% post consumer waste Divider pages (appendices): Hammermill Fore MP 30% post consumer waste PDF VERSION DESIGNED FOR DUPLEX PRINTING State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Sierra and Lassen Counties, California UPDATED: DECEMBER 2009 PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region Headquarters 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Attention: Terri Weist 530.644.5980 PREPARED BY: Sustain Environmental Inc. 3104 "O" Street #164 Sacramento, California 95816 916.457.1856 APPRnvFn RY- Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i
  • Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland

    Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland

    NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. Department of the Interior March 2020 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin Volume 3: Appendices B through N Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIS $2,000,000 The Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Appendix B. Acronyms, Literature Cited, Glossary B.1 ACRONYMS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AML appropriate management level ARMPA Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment BCR bird conservation region BLM Bureau of Land Management BSU biologically significant unit CEQ Council on Environmental Quality EIS environmental impact statement EPA US Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ESR emergency stabilization and rehabilitation FIAT Fire and Invasives Assessment Tool FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act FY fiscal year GHMA general habitat management area HMA herd management area IBA important bird area IHMA important habitat management area MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOU memorandum of understanding MtCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NIFC National Interagency Fire Center NRCS National Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWCG National Wildfire Coordination Group OHMA other habitat management area OHV off-highway vehicle Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin B-1 B.
  • April 1999 SCREE

    April 1999 SCREE

    October, 2007 Peak Climbing Section, Loma Prieta Chapter, Sierra Club Vol. 41 No. 10 World Wide Web Address: http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/pcs/ General Meeting Editor’s Notes Date: October 9, 2007 Winter made a brief appearance last week with snow falling in the mountains (see the Highland Peak report). Expect a gorgeous time of the year for outside activity Time: 7:30 pm in the wilderness using skis, snowshoes or just feet. Where: Peninsula Conservation Center This year we introduce a new kind of trip for those who 3921 E. Bayshore Rd. are more ambitious than the would-be tripper that curls Palo Alto, CA up by the fire with a good book. Called the BSS, Backcountry Ski Series, the offering is a day trip into the backcountry once a month, typically in the Tahoe Program: Canyoneering - area. The trips are scheduled for Friday because North Fork of the Kaweah River Thursday night traffic after 7 pm is quick and smooth while Friday is terrible. Also a Friday outing allows the leaders to recover enough to race in the citizen class Presenter: Toinette Hartshorne races each Sunday or Monday. People may attend one or all trips. Tips on Telemark and Randonee skiing will be available, but participants need to have advanced This past summer, Jef Levin and Toinette skiing skills. Typically there will be anywhere from completed the first descent of the North Fork of good to great powder. the Kaweah River. Several weekends were spent scouting and rigging the technical sections in the Avalanche beacons as well as shovels and probes are beautiful granite canyons carved by this river.
  • Upper Mokelumne Management Unit

    Upper Mokelumne Management Unit

    AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER MOKELUMNE MANAGEMENT UNIT 2016 Prepared By Sarah Mussulman Environmental Scientist Mitch Lockhart Environmental Scientist And Kevin Thomas Kimberly Gagnon NORTH CENTRAL REGION DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. III SECTION I .............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1) OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 2 2) FACTORS AFFECTING THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ........................... 3 3) REGULATORY STATUS OF THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ................... 4 4) RESOURCE ASSESSMENT METHODS ................................................................................... 5 5) FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 6 6) AMPHIBIAN MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 7 7) MONITORING ............................................................................................................................
  • 2020 El Dorado Irrigation District Temporary Water Transfer

    2020 El Dorado Irrigation District Temporary Water Transfer

    PUBLIC DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2020 El Dorado Irrigation District Temporary Water Transfer MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR: El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, CA, 956670 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2020 EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT TEMPORARY WATER TRANSFER The El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Code of Regulations) for the 2020 EID Temporary Water Transfer Project (proposed project). EID plans to transfer up to 8,000 acre-feet (AF) of water to state and/or federal water contractors (Buyers) to be used by the Buyers in their service areas south of the Delta in 2020. EID proposes to transfer water to the Buyers during summer and fall 2020. EID would make the water available through re-operations of three EID reservoirs to release water otherwise planned to be consumed by EID customers and/or stored within the EID network of reservoirs. The involved reservoirs and rivers/creeks would all operate consistent with their historic flow and release schedules, and would meet all applicable rules and requirements, including but not limited to lake level and minimum streamflow requirements. The proposed 8,000-AF transfer quantity would consist of releases from Weber Reservoir (up to 850 AF) that would otherwise remain in Weber Reservoir and releases from Caples/Silver lakes (up to 8,000 AF) that would otherwise be added to storage in Jenkinson Lake or used directly to meet summer/fall 2020 demands that would instead be met with water previously stored in Jenkinson Lake.
  • Biological Resources Reports

    Biological Resources Reports

    APPENDIX B Biological Resources Reports BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT FOR HOFF PROPERTY PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF YORBA LINDA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Rob Hoff 3875 Crest Drive Contact: Rob Hoff Phone: 714-742-1965 Prepared By: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. 29 Orchard Lake Forest, California 92630 Phone: (949) 340-0256 Report Preparer: David Smith July 11, 2019 (Revised November 11, 2020) i INFORMATION SUMMARY A. Report Date: July 11, 2019 (revised November 11, 2020) B. Report Title: Biological Technical Report for the Hoff Property Project, Located in the City of Yorba Linda, Orange County, California C. Project Site Location: The Project is located north of Fairmont Boulevard, east of Rimcrest Drive, south of South Ridge Trail, and west of Fairmont Boulevard and Little Canyon Lane in the city of Yorba Linda, Orange County, California. The site is depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Yorba Linda, California topographic quadrangle (dated 1964 and photorevised in 1981) within unsectioned areas of Township 3S, Range 9W. The Project site is located at latitude 33.908234 and longitude -117.7722826 (center reading). D. Owner/Applicant: Rob Hoff Property Owner 3875 Crest Drive Phone: (714) 742-1965 Email: [email protected] E. Principal Investigator: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. 29 Orchard Lake Forest, California 92630 Phone: (949) 837-0404 Fax: (949) 837-5834 Report Preparer: David Smith F. Report Summary: A biological study was performed for the proposed Hoff Property Project, located in the City of Yorba Linda, Orange County, California. The Project Applicant is proposing to build a single family residence with associated utilities, road access, and fuel modification zones.
  • Preliminary Biological Assessment, Special Status Botanical Survey

    Preliminary Biological Assessment, Special Status Botanical Survey

    PRELIMINARY BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, SPECIAL STATUS BOTANICAL SURVEY, AND BREEDING SEASON BURROWING OWL SURVEY FOR THE SLOVER AND CACTUS WAREHOUSE PROJECT, BLOOMINGTON AREA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ±13.34 Acre Property, ±13.34 Acres Surveyed APNs 0257-071-03, -04, and -39, Bloomington Area, Section 27, Township 1 South, Range 5 West, USGS Fontana 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Map Prepared For: Clark Neuhoff Alere Property Group 100 Byview Circle, No. 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 [email protected] Prepared By: Leslie Irish, Principal [email protected] Guy Bruyea, Biological Investigator [email protected] Carla Wakeman, Senior Biologist [email protected] Jeffrey Sonnentag, Technical Editor [email protected] Vegetation onsite is disturbed and developed/ornamental. No native habitat is present. There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands. No special status plant species have been detected during surveys to date. Botanical surveys will continue through the flowering season in 2018. One (1) special status wildlife species, California horned lark, was observed foraging onsite. One (1) other special status wildlife species, loggerhead shrike, has moderate potential for occurrence, but has not been observed. No evidence of current burrowing owl occupation has been found on the project site to date; however, suitable mammal burrows were observed. Focused burrowing owl surveys will continue through the breeding season in 2018. No suitable habitat for Delhi sands flower-loving fly is present on the project site and no surveys for this species are recommended. Trees, vegetation, and structures suitable for nesting birds are present within and around the site. Recommended mitigation measures include a pre-construction burrowing owl clearance survey and pre-construction nesting bird survey.
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California

    A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
  • USGS Topographic Maps of California

    USGS Topographic Maps of California

    USGS Topographic Maps of California: 7.5' (1:24,000) Planimetric Planimetric Map Name Reference Regular Replace Ref Replace Reg County Orthophotoquad DRG Digital Stock No Paper Overlay Aberdeen 1985, 1994 1985 (3), 1994 (3) Fresno, Inyo 1994 TCA3252 Academy 1947, 1964 (pp), 1964, 1947, 1964 (3) 1964 1964 c.1, 2, 3 Fresno 1964 TCA0002 1978 Ackerson Mountain 1990, 1992 1992 (2) Mariposa, Tuolumne 1992 TCA3473 Acolita 1953, 1992, 1998 1953 (3), 1992 (2) Imperial 1992 TCA0004 Acorn Hollow 1985 Tehama 1985 TCA3327 Acton 1959, 1974 (pp), 1974 1959 (3), 1974 (2), 1994 1974 1994 c.2 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0006 (2), 1994, 1995 (2) Adelaida 1948 (pp), 1948, 1978 1948 (3), 1978 1948, 1978 1948 (pp) c.1 San Luis Obispo 1978 TCA0009 (pp), 1978 Adelanto 1956, 1968 (pp), 1968, 1956 (3), 1968 (3), 1980 1968, 1980 San Bernardino 1993 TCA0010 1980 (pp), 1980 (2), (2) 1993 Adin 1990 Lassen, Modoc 1990 TCA3474 Adin Pass 1990, 1993 1993 (2) Modoc 1993 TCA3475 Adobe Mountain 1955, 1968 (pp), 1968 1955 (3), 1968 (2), 1992 1968 Los Angeles, San 1968 TCA0012 Bernardino Aetna Springs 1958 (pp), 1958, 1981 1958 (3), 1981 (2) 1958, 1981 1981 (pp) c.1 Lake, Napa 1992 TCA0013 (pp), 1981, 1992, 1998 Agua Caliente Springs 1959 (pp), 1959, 1997 1959 (2) 1959 San Diego 1959 TCA0014 Agua Dulce 1960 (pp), 1960, 1974, 1960 (3), 1974 (3), 1994 1960 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0015 1988, 1994, 1995 (3) Aguanga 1954, 1971 (pp), 1971, 1954 (2), 1971 (3), 1982 1971 1954 c.2 Riverside, San Diego 1988 TCA0016 1982, 1988, 1997 (3), 1988 Ah Pah Ridge 1983, 1997 1983 Del Norte, Humboldt 1983
  • Mokelumne Wilderness Management Guidelines

    Mokelumne Wilderness Management Guidelines

    M~okelurilne.~wila·erness,:,, ·.. For~stSeryice' -- '~ ~ _, ~ t -, __ ~ _f Manag~ment.riqid·9lin:~~"- - ~ - - ' ~Pacific somllwestR~gici~ . ' . - -' . ' . ' .. •. artd!~t~r~~ntain ~egioii. ' '· '\' ·;Land· and Resource· > Man~g-~riler1~f. pl,an .· ·· Amel'ldmerit. ,. ~. · · · : "~ ~ -l /~- ... \ '· Mokelumne Wilderness Management Guidelines Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment March,2000 Pacific Southwest Region and Intermountain Regions Eldorado, Stanislaus and Toiyabe National Forests Responsible Agency: Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture Responsible Officials: Judie L. Tartaglia, Acting Forest Supervisor Eldorado National Forest 100 Forni Road Placerville, CA 95667 Ben del Villar, Forest Supervisor Stanislaus National Forest 19777 Greenley Road Sonora, CA 95370 Robert Vaught, Forest Supervisor Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 1200 Franklin Way Sparks, NV 89431 Information Contact: Diana Erickson Eldorado National Forest 100 Forni Road Placerville, CA 95667 (530) 622-5061 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forest Plan Consistency 1 Management Emphasis 1 Area Description and Current Management Situation 1 Desired Future Conditions - Opportunity Class Descriptions 3 Summary Table of Opportunity ~lass Objectives 8 Table of Opportunity Class Allocations 12 Management Area Direction, Standards and Guidelines 13 Resource Area and Management Practices 14 Administrative Activities 14 Air Resources 16 Facilities (trails and signs) 17 Fire Management 21 Fish and Wildlife 22 Heritage Resources 24 Lands 27 Minerals 28 Range 28 Recreation
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Sacramento NE

    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Sacramento NE

    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Sacramento NE Project ID: Sacramento NE Project Title or Area: Sacramento NE 1:100,000 Project area covers the following 31 USGS 7.5 minute quadrangles contained within the Sacramento 1;100,000 quadrangle: Aukum Bear River Reservoir Caldor Camino Caples Lake Coloma Devil Peak Echo Lake Emerald Bay Fiddletown Garden Valley Georgetown Greenwood Kyburz Latrobe Leek Spring Hill Loon Lake Mokelumne Peak Omo Ranch Peddler Hill Placerville Pyramid Peak Riverton Robbs Peak Rockbound Valley Shingle Springs Slate Mountain Sly Park Stump Spring Tragedy Spring Tunnel Hill Source Imagery: Type: CIR for all quadrangles Scale: 1:58,000 for all quadrangles Date: See table below: USGS Quadrangle Photo Date(s) Aukum 6/84 Bear River Reservoir 8/84 Caldor 6/84 Camino 6/84 Caples Lake 8/84, 9/84 Coloma 6/84 Devil Peak 6/84 Echo Lake 8/84 Emerald Bay 8/84 Fiddletown 6/84 Garden Valley 6/84 Georgetown 6/84 Greenwood 6/84 Kyburz 8/84 Latrobe 6/84 Leek Spring Hill 8/84 Loon Lake 9/84 Mokelumne Peak 9/84 Omo Ranch 6/84 Peddler Hill 9/84 Placerville 6/84 Pyramid Peak 9/84 Riverton 9/84 Robbs Peak 9/84 Rockbound Valley 9/84 Shingle Springs 6/84 Slate Mountain 6/84 Sly Park 6/84 Stump Spring 9/84 Tragedy Spring 8/84 Tunnel Hill 6/84 Collateral Data: • USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles • USDA Soil Surveys of Amador Area, El Dorado Area, El Dorado National Forest, Tahoe Basin Area, and Placer County, Western Part.