DOCSLIB.ORG

Bangladesh - Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on Friday 24 & Tuesday 28 October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bangladesh - Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on Friday 24 & Tuesday 28 October 2014 Bangladesh - Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on Friday 24 & Tuesday 28 October 2014 Information on Jamaat-e-Islami including: general information; treatment by Awami League; party leaders between 2010 & 2014 The Jamaat-e-Islami party in an undated document states: “Jamaat e Islami is not a conventional religious, political, social or cultural party only. Jamaat performs as a spiritual party as spiritual life is important in Islam. Jamaat performs in political arena because Islamic law can’t be implemented without political force. Jamaat concentrates upon social service and social reform as strong emphasis has been given on social service and social reform in Islam. In this sense, Jamaat- e- Islami is a complete Islamic movement” (Jamaat-e-Islami (Undated) About Us). This document also notes: “To be associated with Jamaat: Firstly fill up the form of associate member Regularly attend in weekly meeting for attaining Islamic knowledge and character Attentively read tafsir (explanation) of Quran and Hadith, Islamic literature and news papers. Practice according to what knowledge you have gained and take firm decision not to do anything against your conscience. Be the member of Jamaat to perform the duty of deen efficiently” (ibid). A repot issued in 2014 by the Hindu American Foundation notes: “Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) Bangladesh is an offshoot of the Jamaat organization that was founded in undivided India in 1941 by Maulana Abul Ala Mauddudi. Jamaat drew its inspiration from the Deobandi school of Islam, known for promoting religious extremism in several countries in the region, and modeled itself after the Muslim Brotherhood.1 Separate branches were subsequently established in both Pakistan and Bangladesh (then East Pakistan), also known as Jamaat-e-Islami, following India’s partition. JeI Bangladesh and its student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir (ICS), continue to primarily draw their members from Deobandi seminaries in the country” (Hindu American Foundation (2014) Bangladesh: Jamaat-e-Islami - A Nexus of Terror, p.1). This document also states: “In August 2013, a High Court imposed a partial ban on JeI (upon the petition of a Sufi Muslim group) declaring that the Islamist party’s charter violated the constitution. The ruling, however, only prohibits JeI from participating in national elections and has failed to limit its other activities” (ibid, p.2). The Wall Street Journal in August 2013 notes that: “The Jamaat, though small compared with the ruling Awami League and the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party, has emerged as a kingmaker in recent elections” (Wall Street Journal (1 August 2013) Bangladesh Court Strikes Down Jamaat-e-Islami's Electoral Registration). This document also points out that: “Established in 1941 by Abul Ala Maududi, an Indian theologian, the Jamaat emerged as the main Islamist party in Pakistan after independence from British rule in 1947. The Jamaat was opposed to Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan in 1971, but it denies any role in the war crimes committed by pro-Pakistan militias. Party leaders say the Jamaat accepted independence after the war and has been part of the political process in the country since 1975. In 1996, the Jamaat forged an electoral understanding with the Awami League, helping it sweep to power. The Jamaat's 2001 alliance with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party was a key factor in the center-right party coming to power, according to political analysts. The Jamaat's influence waned in the last parliamentary polls in 2009, which saw the party's share of the popular vote decline to 4% from 12%. But it still has influence in rural areas and most experts see it as an important component of the opposition alliance led by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. A war crimes tribunal looking into atrocities committed during the 1971 war this year found six Jamaat leaders guilty of crimes against humanity. Jamaat activists protesting the verdicts have engaged in violent clashes with police. About 100 people, mostly Jamaat supporters, have died in the clashes, according to police and human rights groups” (ibid). In April 2014 a Human Rights Watch report states: “…Jamaat-e-Islami, is the largest Islamist political party and an ally of the BNP” (Human Rights Watch (29 April 2014, Democracy in the Crossfire, Opposition Violence and Government Abuses in the 2014 Pre- and Post- Election Period in Bangladesh, p.10). This report also points out that: “The 2014 election also took place against a backdrop of violence related to the prosecution and sentencing of Jamaat leaders accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity during Bangladesh’s struggle for independence in 1971. Opposition supporters resorted to violence following the death sentence of Jamaat leader Hossain Sayedee on February 28, 2013” (ibid, p.11). In July 2014 a paper published by Odhikar states: “On April 9, 2014 a Jamaat activist Alamgir Hossain (30) was killed and 10 people were injured in a clash between supporters of Awami League and Jamaat-e-Islami in Chor Dhulgagra village under Belkuchi Upazila in Sirajganj” (Odhikar (1 July 2014) Six-Months Human Rights Monitoring Report: January 1 – June 30, 2014). A report published in September 2014 by Janes states: “Forty Jamaat-e-Islami (Jel) activists were arrested in a police force raid operation in Kaliganj sub-district of Bangladesh's Jhenidah district on 26 September, the Daily Star reported” (Janes (30 September 2014) Police forces arrest 40 Jel activists in Bangladesh's Jhenidah). A report published in September 2014 by Amnesty International notes that: “…the motives for the enforced disappearances appear to have been political, with the targets being members of the opposition parties. At least eight of the 20 people mentioned above have been prominent members of the BNP or Jamaat-e-Islami” (Amnesty International (2 September 2014) Bangladesh: Stop enforced disappearances, torture and restrictions on freedom of expression, p.3). BBC News in October 2013 states: “The former leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami…Ghulam Azam, 90, was the party's leader until 2000…” (BBC News (1 October 2013) Bangladesh war crimes trial: Key accused). In October 2014 the Asian Tribune states: “Ghulam Azam was ameer (chief) of East Pakistan Jamaat-e-Islami during the Liberation War in 1971. He also became ameer of Bangladesh Jamaat in 1991. He left the party’s top post in 2000 through handing over charge of the party to war crimes accused Motiur Rahman Nizami” (Asian Tribune (24 October 2014) Bangladesh War criminal Ghulam Azam dies in Prison). In January 2014 BBC News notes the: “…head of Bangladesh's main Islamist party, Motiur Rahman Nizami…Jamaat-e- Islami president…” (BBC News (30 January 2014) Bangladesh Islamist leader Motiur Rahman Nizami to hang). In June 2014 Al Jazeera notes that: “Bangladesh's war crimes court has postponed a verdict on the leader of the country's largest Islamist party for alleged crimes committed during the 1971 independence struggle, according to local media. Motiur Rahman Nizami, 71, faces 16 charges including mass killings, rape, arson and genocide, relating to violence committed by a militia” (Al Jazeera (24 June 2014) Bangladesh defers verdict on Jamaat leader). This document also states that: “Nizami…[is] the president of Jamaat-e-Islami…” (ibid. BDNews24 in October 2014 notes the: “Jamaat-e-Islami chief Motiur Rahman Nizami…” (BDNews24 (28 October 2014) The 16 charges against Jamaat-e-Islami chief Nizami). No further information on any of these issues could be found among sources available to the RDC. References Al Jazeera (24 June 2014) Bangladesh defers verdict on Jamaat leader http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2014/06/bangladesh-defers-verdict-jamaat- leader-201462462725784475.html Accessed Friday 24 October 2014 Amnesty International (2 September 2014) Bangladesh: Stop enforced disappearances, torture and restrictions on freedom of expression http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA13/006/2014/en Accessed Friday 24 October 2014 Asian Tribune (24 October 2014) Bangladesh War criminal Ghulam Azam dies in Prison http://www.asiantribune.com/node/85711 Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 BBC News (30 January 2014) Bangladesh Islamist leader Motiur Rahman Nizami to hang http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-25962798# Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 BBC News (1 October 2013) Bangladesh war crimes trial: Key accused http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-20970123 Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 BDNews24 (28 October 2014) The 16 charges against Jamaat-e-Islami chief Nizami http://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2014/10/28/the-16-charges-against-jamaat-e- islami-chief-nizami Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Hindu American Foundation (2014) Bangladesh: Jamaat-e-Islami - A Nexus of Terror http://hafsite.org/about/where_we_stand Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Human Rights Watch (29 April 2014, Democracy in the Crossfire, Opposition Violence and Government Abuses in the 2014 Pre- and Post- Election Period in Bangladesh http://www.hrw.org/reports/2014/04/29/democracy-crossfire Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Jamaat-e-Islami (undated) About us http://www.jamaat-e-islami.org/en/aboutus.php Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Janes (30 September 2014) Police forces arrest 40 Jel activists in Bangladesh's Jhenidah http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb =21_T20825202065&format=GNBFULL&sort=BOOLEAN&startDocNo=101&results UrlKey=29_T20825202075&cisb=22_T20825202073&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&c si=411136&docNo=124 This is a subscription database Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Odhikar (1 July 2014) Six-Months Human Rights Monitoring Report: January 1 – June 30, 2014 http://www.ein.org.uk/members/country-report/six-months-human-rights-monitoring- report-january-1-june-30-2014 This is a subscription database Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 Wall Street Journal (1 August 2013) Bangladesh Court Strikes Down Jamaat-e- Islami's Electoral Registration http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323681904578641530401992180 Accessed Tuesday 28 October 2014 This response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Refugee Documentation Centre within time constraints.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE the COLONIAL CONTEXT: the BIRTH of BANGLADESH in Retrospectt
    SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE THE COLONIAL CONTEXT: THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH IN RETROSPECTt By VedP. Nanda* I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the Indo-Pakistan War in December 1971, the independent nation-state of Bangladesh was born.' Within the next four months, more than fifty countries had formally recognized the new nation.2 As India's military intervention was primarily responsible for the success of the secessionist movement in what was then known as East Pakistan, and for the creation of a new political entity on the inter- national scene,3 many serious questions stemming from this historic event remain unresolved for the international lawyer. For example: (1) What is the continuing validity of Article 2 (4) of the United Nations Charter?4 (2) What is the current status of the doctrine of humanita- rian intervention in international law?5 (3) What action could the United Nations have taken to avert the Bangladesh crisis?6 (4) What measures are necessary to prevent such tragic occurrences in the fu- ture?7 and (5) What relationship exists between the principle of self- "- This paper is an adapted version of a chapter that will appear in Y. ALEXANDER & R. FRIEDLANDER, SELF-DETERMINATION (1979). * Professor of Law and Director of the International Legal Studies Program, Univer- sity of Denver Law Center. 1. See generally BANGLADESH: CRISIS AND CONSEQUENCES (New Delhi: Deen Dayal Research Institute 1972); D. MANKEKAR, PAKISTAN CUT TO SIZE (1972); PAKISTAN POLITI- CAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS: EMERGENCE OF BANGLADESH (S. Varma & V. Narain eds. 1972). 2. Ebb Tide, THE ECONOMIST, April 8, 1972, at 47.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali Language
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: BGD30821 Country: Bangladesh Date: 8 November 2006 Keywords: Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali language This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? 3. Is the Awami League traditionally supported by the Hindus in Bangladesh? 4. Are Hindu supporters of the Awami League discriminated against and if so, by whom? 5. Are there parts of Bangladesh where Hindus enjoy more safety? 6. Is Bengali the language of Bangladeshis? RESPONSE 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? Hindus constitute approximately 10 percent of the population in Bangladesh making them a religious minority. Sunni Muslims constitute around 88 percent of the population and Buddhists and Christians make up the remainder of the religious minorities. The Hindu minority in Bangladesh has progressively diminished since partition in 1947 from approximately 25 percent of the population to its current 10 percent (US Department of State 2006, International Religious Freedom Report for 2006 – Bangladesh, 15 September – Attachment 1). 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? In general, minorities in Bangladesh have been consistently mistreated by the government and Islamist extremists. Specific discrimination against the Hindu minority intensified immediately following the 2001 national elections when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) gained victory with its four-party coalition government, including two Islamic parties.
    [Show full text]
  • AATA 3541 (14 March 2016)
    5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ 1418185 (Refugee) [2016] AATA 3541 (14 March 2016) DECISION RECORD DIVISION: Migration & Refugee Division CASE NUMBER: 1418185 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Bangladesh MEMBER: Tania Flood DATE: 14 March 2016 PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection visa. Statement made on 14 March 2016 at 9:38am Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant. 4GVTKGXGFHTQO#WUV.++QP,WN[CV 8GTKH[XGTUKQP 5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Bangladesh, applied for the visa [in] September 2013 and the delegate refused to grant the visa [in] October 2014. 3. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 2 March 2016 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Bengali and English languages. 4. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE 5. The criteria for a protection visa are set out in s.36 of the Act and Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Political Ideology of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman by Atiqur Rahman Mujahid
    DEBATING NATIONALISM IN BANGLADESH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN BY ATIQUR RAHMAN MUJAHID A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Human Sciences in History and Civilization Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Science International Islamic University Malaysia NOVEMBER 2018 ABSTRACT Sheikh Mujibur Rahman has been the central role player in the movement of Bangladeshi independence. His dominant role and presence has earned him the title “Father of the nation.” However, his political ideology has been debated intensely. Sheikh Mujib being the most towering figure in Bangladeshi politics, has been explained, claimed and counter claimed by political parties and intellectuals as a secular, a Bengali and a socialist or a mix of all. This thesis argues that such understanding about Sheikh Mujib is only partial, and is conditioned by two factors: firstly, looking at only half of Sheikh Mujib’s entire political career, that is post-1947 Sheikh Mujib in Pakistan politics; and secondly, looking at Sheikh Mujib in the context of independence movement alone as an anti-Pakistan politician. The thesis argues that the true political ideology of Sheikh Mujib should be constructed based on the context of nationalism-debate, political psychology and political trend that he inherited, oriented with and practiced in his entire political career spanning during the last two decades of British India and the first two decades of united Pakistan. In analyzing his entire political career the research found that Sheikh Mujib and his political ideology are embodiment of the spirit of independence and Muslim identity consciousness inherited from Wahhabi-Farayezi-Deobandi anti-British Islamic movements, modernist Aligarh movement, Muslim League and Pakistan movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights
    BANGLADESH: URDU-SPEAKING “BIHARIS” SEEK RECOGNITION, RESPECT AND RIGHTS BANGLADESH: URDU-SPEAKING “BIHARIS” SEEK RECOGNITION, RESPECT AND RIGHTS International Republican Institute IRI.org @IRIglobal © 2020 All Rights Reserved Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights Copyright © 2020 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attn: Department of External Affairs International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Cover Image Description: Aerial view of the Biharis Relief Camp, known as the “Geneva Camp.” IRI | BANGLADESH • Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” 3 OVERVIEW In early 2020, the International Republican Institute (IRI) conducted a qualitative research study of the Bihari community in Bangladesh — an Urdu-speaking linguistic minority group in the South Asian nation. The study examined the challenges and needs of Biharis in different locations around Bangladesh. The term “Bihari” refers to approximately 300,000 non-Bengali, Urdu-speaking citizens of Bangladesh who came to what was then East Pakistan mostly from the Indian states of Bihar and West Bengal after the Partition of India in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh: Extremism & Counter-Extremism
    Bangladesh: Extremism & Counter-Extremism On July 1, 2016, at least five Islamist militants stormed into Holey Artisan Bakery, an upscale restaurant in the Gulshan neighborhood of Dhaka, and detonated explosives before separating the Muslim and local Bangladeshi hostages from the non-Muslims and foreigners. After a 12-hour siege, Bangladeshi security forces stormed the restaurant in the early hours of July 2 and freed 13 hostages. The officials found 20 hostages hacked and stabbed to death, including Italian, Japanese, Indian, and U.S. citizens. Four militants and two police officers were killed over the course of the incident, and one militant was arrested. (Sources: Reuters, Dhaka Tribune, CNN, BBC News, BBC News) The July 1 restaurant attack reportedly was the 24th ISIS attack in Bangladesh since September 2015, and the most deadly in a spate of terror attacks in Bangladesh in 2016. Though ISIS claimed responsibility, some U.S. officials said that the assault bore the hallmark of al-Qaeda’s regional affiliate, al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent. In October 2016, ISIS released an article reiterating its claim of responsibility and providing its own narrative of the attacks. Bangladeshi authorities reportedly have evidence of communications between the architect of the attack and Abu Terek Mohammad Tajuddin Kausar, an ISIS militant born in Bangladesh but living in Australia. Kausar is said to have approved the attack and ordered the assailants to specifically target non-Muslim foreigners and expatriates. (Sources: Guardian, Dhaka Tribune, NPR, Times of India, CNN, Hindu BusinessLine, Dhaka Tribune, Reuters, Reuters, New York Times) Bangladeshi officials nonetheless claim that ISIS does not maintain a presence in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Torture in Bangladesh 1971-2004
    TORTURE IN BANGLADESH 1971-2004 MAKING INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENTS A REALITY AND PROVIDING JUSTICE AND REPARATIONS TO VICTIMS AUGUST 2004 REALISED WITH FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN INITIATIVE FOR DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS The Redress Trust 87 Vauxhall Walk, 3rd Floor London, SE11 5HJ Tel: +44 (0)207 793 1777 Fax: +44(0)207 793 1719 Website: www.redress.org 1 TORTURE IN BANGLADESH 1971- 2004 INDEX I. INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 4 II. CONTEXT OF TORTURE IN BANGLADESH ................................ ................................ .. 5 A. POLITICAL HISTORY..............................................................................................................................5 B. TORTURE AND OTHER SERIOUS ABUSES COMMITTED IN THE COURSE OF THE 1971 WAR.....7 i. Violations attributed to Pakistani forces and “collaborators”..................................................................................................7 ii. Violations attributed to the Mukthi Bahini and Bengali civilians.............................................................................................8 C. THE PRACTICE OF TORTURE IN BANGLADESH FROM 1971-2004...................................................9 III. BANGLADESH’S OBLIGATIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION IN DOMESTIC LAW ................................ ................................ .......... 13 A. INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS .........................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Theses
    Australian National University THESES SIS/LIBRARY TELEPHONE: +61 2 6125 4631 R.G. MENZIES LIBRARY BUILDING NO:2 FACSIMILE: +61 2 6125 4063 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY EMAIL: [email protected] CANBERRA ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA USE OF THESES This copy is supplied for purposes of private study and research only. Passages from the thesis may not be copied or closely paraphrased without the written consent of the author. INDIA-BANGLADESH POLITICAL RELATIONS DURING THE AWAMI LEAGUE GOVERNMENT, 1972-75 by Shaukat Hassan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Australian National University April 1987 Deelarat ion Except where otherwise indicated this thesis is my own work. Utx*.s Shaukat Hassan April 1987 Acknowledgements I wish to thank Professors George Codding of the Un.iversity of Colorado, Thomas Hovet and M. George Zaninovich of the University of Oregon, Talukdar Maniruzzaman of the University of Dhaka, Mr. Neville Maxwell of the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, Oxford University, and Brigadier Abdul Momen, former Director General of the Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies, Dhaka, for making it possible for me to undertake this study. I am equally grateful to the Department of International Relations at the Australian National University for generously providing me the necessary funds to carry out research overseas. I must express my sincere gratitude to all those in the United States, the United Kingdom, India, Bangladesh, the People's Repub­ lic of China, and Australia who granted me interviews, many of whom must remain anonymous. My special thanks and appreciation are due to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberation War of Bangladesh
    Bangladesh Liberation War, 1971 By: Alburuj Razzaq Rahman 9th Grade, Metro High School, Columbus, Ohio The Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971 was for independence from Pakistan. India and Pakistan got independence from the British rule in 1947. Pakistan was formed for the Muslims and India had a majority of Hindus. Pakistan had two parts, East and West, which were separated by about 1,000 miles. East Pakistan was mainly the eastern part of the province of Bengal. The capital of Pakistan was Karachi in West Pakistan and was moved to Islamabad in 1958. However, due to discrimination in economy and ruling powers against them, the East Pakistanis vigorously protested and declared independence on March 26, 1971 under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. But during the year prior to that, to suppress the unrest in East Pakistan, the Pakistani government sent troops to East Pakistan and unleashed a massacre. And thus, the war for liberation commenced. The Reasons for war Both East and West Pakistan remained united because of their religion, Islam. West Pakistan had 97% Muslims and East Pakistanis had 85% Muslims. However, there were several significant reasons that caused the East Pakistani people to fight for their independence. West Pakistan had four provinces: Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and the North-West Frontier. The fifth province was East Pakistan. Having control over the provinces, the West used up more resources than the East. Between 1948 and 1960, East Pakistan made 70% of all of Pakistan's exports, while it only received 25% of imported money. In 1948, East Pakistan had 11 fabric mills while the West had nine.
    [Show full text]
  • BANGLADESH COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    BANGLADESH COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 30 September 2012 BANGLADESH 30 SEPTEMBER 2012 Contents Go to End Preface REPORTS ON BANGLADESH PUBLISHED OR FIRST ACCESSED BETWEEN 31 AUGUST AND 30 SEPTEMBER 2012 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 1.01 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.06 Maps of Bangladesh ............................................................................................. 1.07 Other maps of Bangladesh ................................................................................. 1.07 2. ECONOMY ....................................................................................................................... 2.01 3. HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 3.01 Pre-independence: 1947- 1971 ............................................................................ 3.01 Post-independence: 1972 - April 2010 .............................................................. 3.02 Government of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, 1972-75 ............................................. 3.02 Government of Ziaur Rahman, 1975-81 ............................................................. 3.03 Government of Hussain Mohammed Ershad, 1982-90 ...................................... 3.04 Government of Khaleda Zia,
    [Show full text]
  • Free Ghulam Azam
    FREE GHULAM AZAM A briefing on the arrest and defence of former political leader and activist Professor Ghulam Azam www.ghulamazam.net @freeghulamazam facebook.com/FreeGhulamAzam On 11th January 2012, police arrested Ghulam Azam, a veteran including during his time democracy campaigner and former chief of one of the biggest as General Secretary Key Points opposition parties in Bangladesh. He faces trial by the self- of Dhaka University proclaimed ‘International Crimes Tribunal’, established by Student Union. l Ghulam Azam, a key political figure in the ruling Awami League government; purportedly created Bangladesh, was arrested on 11th to seek justice for crimes committed during Bangladesh’s However, unlike January 2012 bloody liberation struggle in 1971. Respected rights groups the Awami League l He rejects accusations of committing such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International as which led Bangladesh crimes against humanity during the well as the International Bar Association have cast doubt on into independence, 1971 independence struggle, and is the proceedings. Many see these actions as a step towards Ghulam Azam and willing to defend his name in a fair trial an authoritarian one-party state as existed soon after several other parties l Human rights groups have cast doubt independence. Ghulam Azam, aged 89, led the Jamaat-e-Islami were committed to on the legitimacy of the ‘International party during Bangladesh’s traumatic birth. the union of Pakistan Crimes Tribunal’, the government and felt that the appointed body that has called for Today he is accused of a number of crimes allegedly committed people of Bangladesh Ghulam Azam’s trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Caught Between Fear and Repression
    CAUGHT BETWEEN FEAR AND REPRESSION ATTACKS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN BANGLADESH Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Cover design and illustration: © Colin Foo Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 13/6114/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION TIMELINE 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & METHODOLOGY 6 1. ACTIVISTS LIVING IN FEAR WITHOUT PROTECTION 13 2. A MEDIA UNDER SIEGE 27 3. BANGLADESH’S OBLIGATIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 42 4. BANGLADESH’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK 44 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 Glossary AQIS - al-Qa’ida in the Indian Subcontinent
    [Show full text]