Security Council Provisional Seventy-First Year
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FINAL REPORT of SOFIMUN 2010
INTERNATIONAL YOUNG LEADERS CONFERENCE SOFIA INTERNATIONAL MODEL UNITED NATIONS EDITION III Sofia, Bulgaria, EU 24-31 July 2010 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS Main 1 General Guest Speaker – James Warlick 28 Contents 3 General Guest Speaker – Reiweger 29 Sponsors 4 FES 30 Partners 5 Rotary and Rotaract presentation 31 Realization – Organizations 6 Realization – Team + Special Guests 7 SIMULATED ORGANS Board of Trustees of the SOFIMUN International Foundation 8 Security Council 32 Opening speech of the SG of Human Rights Council 36 SOFIMUN 2010 10 International Court of Justice 40 Commission on Sustainable LETTERS AND ADDRESSES Development 44 Mayor of Sofia 12 Council of Ministers of the EU 48 Ministry of Foreign Affairs 13 Parliament of the EU 52 Ministry of Justice 14 SOFIMUN News Network 56 Ministry of Finance 15 Ministry of Regional Development Opening ceremony and gala dinner 60 and Public Works 16 Closing ceremony and gala dinner 61 Ministry of Labor and Social Policy 17 Program 62 Ministry of Culture 18 Museum trip 64 Ministry of Education, Youth and Night of the political leader 65 Science 19 Venues 66 UNICEF Bulgaria 20 Medical services 67 EU Commission 21 Accommodation 68 Embassy of Austria 22 Parties 69 Embassy of Belgium 23 Popularization – media partners and Embassy of Italy 24 academic cooperation 70 Friedrich Ebert Stiftung 25 Cooperation with similar organizations Human Resources Development and MUN partners 71 Center 26 Organization – fees, packages, legal Nottingham Internatio nal MUN 27 notice 72 Words of Gratitude 73 Closing -
Bulgaria's Hezbollah Moment
Report Bulgaria’s Hezbollah Moment Dimitar Bechev* Al Jazeera Center for Studies Tel: +974-44663454 25 February 2013 [email protected] http://studies.aljazeera.net/en/ As I write these lines, European Union (EU) foreign ministers are convening in Brussels. The regular Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) chaired by Cathy Ashton, the Union’s external relations supremo, is to discuss, amongst other things, how to deal with Hezbollah. On 5 February, Bulgarian authorities declared they had “grounded suspicions” of the Iranian- backed organisation’s – or more specifically its military wing – involvement in the bomb attack that killed five Israeli tourists and the Bulgarian driving their bus as they were about to leave the airport at the Black Sea resort town of Burgas on 18 July 2012.1 Bulgaria calls for measures against Hezbollah, stressing the fact it is the first time it has been linked to an attack on European soil. However, due to brief his opposite numbers in Brussels, Foreign Minister Nickolay Mladenov has neither spoken clearly in favour of blacklisting the organisation as a terrorist group2 nor dismissed the option. Rather, he called for “a political debate on what measures should be taken collectively by Europe to prevent similar terrorist attacks in the future.”3 In a similar vein, the 5 February statement, produced after a session of the Consultative Council on National Security, called for reinforced cooperation with Lebanon for the tracing of the individuals linked to the bomb attack;4 and it should be noted that Najib Mikati, the Middle Eastern country’s prime minister, visited Sofia as recently as last November.5 Clearly, Bulgarian authorities have tried to strike a balancing act: pointing a finger at the Shi’ite movement but ensuring that the government in Lebanon (which it supports) is not alienated, responding to the demands of Israel and the United States but also showing commitment to a unified EU stance in favour of keeping Lebanon stable in the face of a fierce civil war next-door in Syria. -
Amcham Annual Report 2012
2013 SOFIA, JANUARY, 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS Report of the Board of Directors page 1 Organizational Structure – Board of Directors and AmCham Team page 5 Key Performance Indicators page 6 Membership 2012 page 8 AmCham Events 2012 page 14 AmCham Committees & Working Groups page 24 Our Speakers page 30 International Cooperation page 34 Financial Report 2012 page 37 AmCham Bulgaria Publications page 38 In the media in 2012 page 39 Audit Report 2011 page 41 REPort of THE BOARD of DIREctors FOR THE YEAR 2012 DEAR AMCHAM MEMBErs: more foreign investments, leveling the playing field for On behalf of the American Chamber of Commerce Board fair competition were outlined to be the focus of the Jobs of Directors it is my pleasure to present you with our Diplomacy mission of the State Department. Annual Report for 2012. The conference was hosted by the Secretary of State, Further below you will see the Key Performance Indicators Hillary Clinton who said in her speech “Finally, we fun- as well as more detailed presentation of the events activi- damentally believe that increasing trade and growing ties of our committees, position papers, media coverage, prosperity will benefit not just our own people, but etc. people everywhere. Our economies are interdependent as never before, and so are our fates. America’s economic The facts and figures in the AmCham scorecard are renewal depends to a large degree on the strength of the important but it is far more interesting to see what is global economy, and the global economy depends on the behind these facts and figures. -
Elusive Identity: Duality and Missed Opportunities in Bulgarian Foreign Policy in the Black Sea Region
Part III The East of Europe, West of Russia: What Role for Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey? Elusive Identity: Duality and Missed Opportunities in Bulgarian Foreign Policy in the Black Sea Region Stefan Ralchev 1 Executive summary Bulgaria lacks a coherent, if any, foreign policy in the region of the Black Sea. As a littoral Black Sea country, a former part of the Soviet power system and a current member state on the Euro- pean Union’s Eastern flank, Bulgaria has all the prerequisites for a more active economic and political engagement with the coun- tries in this part of the world. However, for various reasons, this potential has been greatly underused. Bulgaria is in search of its own identity: on the one hand, it is formally part of the Western family of nations (confirmed with its 2004 NATO and 2007 EU accessions), which has been evident in numerous foreign policy choices; on the other hand, the historical legacy of its relations with Russia, the vassal position during the Soviet years and the current total dependence on energy resources from Moscow have driven Bulgarian leadership to take foreign policy decisions vis- à-vis the Black Sea area hardly in line with its own or EU interests and conforming more to a desire not to be in Russia’s way. This 1 Stefan Ralchev is Programme Director and Policy Analyst at the Insti- tute for Regional and International Studies (IRIS) in Sofia, Bulgaria. His work focuses on regional relations, security, democracy and domestic political developments in the Balkans and the Black Sea region in the context of European integration. -
THE NEW POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY of EUROPE Edited by Nicholas Walton and Jan Zielonka ABOUT ECFR
THE NEW POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE edited by Nicholas Walton and Jan Zielonka ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over one hundred and seventy Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. In the future ECFR plans to open an office in Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. -
Letter Dated 23 July 2020 Addressed to the Secretary-General and the Permanent Representatives of the Members of the Security Co
United Nations S/2020/736 Security Council Distr.: General 28 July 2020 Original: English Letter dated 23 July 2020 from the President of the Security Council addressed to the Secretary-General and the Permanent Representatives of the members of the Security Council I have the honour to enclose herewith a copy of the briefings provided by Mr. Nickolay Mladenov, Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Personal Representative of the Secretary-General; Mr. Khalil Shikaki, Professor of Political Science and Director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research; and Mr. Daniel Levy, President of the US/Middle East Project, as well as the statements delivered by His Excellency Mr. Miguel Berger, State Secretary of the Federal Foreign Office of Germany, and by the representatives of Belgium, China, the Dominican Republic, Estonia, France, Indonesia, the Niger, the Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Tunisia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Viet Nam, in connection with the video-teleconference on the agenda item entitled “The situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian Question”, convened on Tuesday, 21 July 2020. A statement was also delivered by the representative of Israel. In accordance with the understanding reached among Council members for this video-teleconference, the following delegations and entities submitted written statements, copies of which are also enclosed: Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, the European Union, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ireland, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, the League of Arab States, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. -
General Assembly Official Records Seventieth Session
United Nations A/70/ PV.19 General Assembly Official Records Seventieth session 19th plenary meeting Wednesday, 30 September 2015, 9 a.m. New York President: Mr. Lykketoft .......................................... (Denmark) The meeting was called to order at 9.05 a.m. conflicts, wars and terrorism creating insecurity around Europe. Our citizens feel that instability. They expect Address by Mr. Rosen Plevneliev, President of the politicians to act boldly, to solve and not to deepen the Republic of Bulgaria crises. The President: The Assembly will now hear an The ongoing conflicts in Syria, the Middle East address by the President of the Republic of Bulgaria. and North Africa are threatening the lives of millions. The rising extremism that no borders can contain is Mr. Rosen Plevneliev, President of the Republic of a serious challenge to the international community. Bulgaria, was escorted into the General Assembly The degrading humanitarian situation in several Hall. conflict zones has forced millions of people to leave The President: On behalf of the General Assembly, their homes, pack their whole lives into a suitcase I have the honour to welcome to the United Nations and embark on a perilous, sometimes even deadly His Excellency Mr. Rosen Plevneliev, President of the journey to safety. Hundreds of thousands of people Republic of Bulgaria, and to invite him to address the are at Europe’s doorstep, reaching out for a helping Assembly. hand, struggling and fighting for the right to live. As a result, nationalistic parties that feed on people’s fears President Plevneliev: Allow me to congratulate have seized the day and are gaining momentum. -
Judge Péter Kovács' Partly Dissenting Opinion Public
ICC-01/18-143-Anx1 05-02-2021 1/163 EC PT Judge Péter Kovács’ Partly Dissenting Opinion Public Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology and reasoning ............................................................................................. 3 A) What is the legal value of the United Nations resolutions? ................................... 4 B) Interlocking presumptions? ..................................................................................... 7 C) Competence for an in merito assessment of the notion of ‘the territory of the State’ in the situation sub judice ....................................................................................... 11 D) The Majority Decision and the rules of interpretation of the Vienna Convention 19 E) Did the Majority provide a practical answer to the Prosecutor? ....................... 32 The legitimacy and importance of relying on international law when assessing the impact of international legal documents on the situation sub judice................................. 35 The issue of the Montevideo criteria ............................................................................. 42 A) The Montevideo Convention and customary law ................................................. 42 B) The ‘permanent population’ criterion................................................................... 45 C) The ‘defined territory’ criterion ........................................................................... -
S/PV.7929 the Situation in the Middle East, Including the Palestinian Question 20/04/2017
United Nations S/ PV.7929 Security Council Provisional Seventy-second year 7929th meeting Thursday, 20 April 2017, 10 a.m. New York President: Mrs. Haley/Ms. Sison ............................ (United States of America) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Llorentty Solíz China ......................................... Mr. Liu Jieyi Egypt ......................................... Mr. Aboulatta Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Alemu France ........................................ Mr. Delattre Italy .......................................... Mr. Cardi Japan ......................................... Mr. Bessho Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Rakhmetullin Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Iliichev Senegal ....................................... Mr. Seck Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog Ukraine ....................................... Mr. Kyslytsya United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Mr. Rycroft Uruguay ....................................... Mr. Rosselli Agenda The situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question Letter dated 10 April 2017 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (S/2017/305) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should -
EU Member States and Enlargement Towards the Balkans
EU member states and enlargement towards the Balkans EPC ISSUE PAPER NO. 79 J u l y 2 0 1 5 Edited by Rosa Balfour and Corina Stratulat EUROPEAN POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONS ISSN 1782-494X PROGRAMME The EPC’s Programme on European Politics and Institutions With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the new focus of this programme is on adapting the EU’s institutional architecture to take account of the changed set-up and on bringing the EU closer to its citizens. Continuing discussion on governance and policymaking in Brussels is essential to ensure that the European project can move forward and respond to the challenges facing the Union in the 21st century in a democratic and effective manner. This debate is closely linked to the key questions of how to involve European citizens in the discussions over its future; how to win their support for European integration and what are the prospects for, and consequences of, further enlargement towards the Balkans and Turkey. This programme focuses on these core themes and brings together all the strands of the debate on a number of key issues, addressing them through various fora, task forces and projects. It also works with other programmes on cross-cutting issues such as the reform of European economic governance or the new EU foreign policy structures. ii Table of Contents About the authors .................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ -
Building Bridges for Peace U.S
Building Bridges for Peace U.S. Policy Toward Arab States, Palestinians, and Israel DAVID MAKOVSKY Executive Summary January 2021 he Biden administration has the opportunity to use progress in Arab-Israel normalization to reenergize dormant ties T between the United States and the Palestinian Authority and between Ramallah and Jerusalem. While circumstances are not ripe for a dash toward a conflict-ending final settlement, now is the time for U.S. leadership to rebuild constructive relations between the key parties and restore hope, energy, and enthusiasm in the potential for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Following are principles for moving U.S. policy in a positive direction: DAVID MAKOVSKY Invest in Arab-Israel normalization. Strategic Affirm U.S. support for Israeli security. If Israel convergence between moderate Arab states and limits settlement activity to within the security Israel is a longstanding goal of U.S. policy and a barrier, the United States should differentiate plus for U.S. interests. The Biden administration between settlements consistent with a two-state should welcome its predecessor’s legacy in terms of solution and those undermining the potential Arab state normalization with Israel, deepen these for it. Any U.S. discussion of Israeli territorial emerging partnerships, anchor them in a common compromise for the sake of peace must begin with strategy to counter threats to common interests, an unwavering affirmation of U.S. support for and use them to enhance the potential for Israeli security, including strategic cooperation constructive Israeli-Palestinian relations. with Jerusalem to confront the Iranian nuclear challenge and measures Israel might take to combat Build on normalization to shrink the Israeli- Iran’s efforts to arm its allies and proxies with Palestinian conflict and keep open the door to a advanced weaponry. -
THE NEW POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY of EUROPE Edited by Nicholas Walton and Jan Zielonka ABOUT ECFR
THE NEW POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE edited by Nicholas Walton and Jan Zielonka ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over one hundred and seventy Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. In the future ECFR plans to open an office in Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets.