Arxiv:1005.0059V1 [Hep-Ex] 1 May 2010

Home , SciBooNE

arXiv:1005.0059v1 [hep-ex] 1 May 2010 † France Yvette, ∗ § Canada 2A3, Japan 506-1205, Gifu Tokyo, ‡ of University Research, ∗∗ Japan 990-8560 Yamagata, nvriyo e ok tn ro,N 19-80 USA 11794-3800, NY Brook, Stony York, New of University aoaUiest,Fr-h,Ciuak,Ngy,Japan Nagoya, ¶ Chikusa-ku, Furo-cho, University, Nagoya †† rsn drs:KmoaOsraoy nttt o Cosmi for Institute Observatory, Kamioka address: Present rsn drs:SlrTretilEvrnetLaborato Environment Solar-Terrestrial address: V6T Columbia, Present British Vancouver, TRIUMF, address: Present rsn drs:DMIf/P,CASca,F911Gif-su F-91191 Saclay, CEA DSM/Irfu/SPP, address: Present rsn drs:Dprmn fPyis aaaaUniversi Yamagata Physics, of Department address: Present rsn drs:Dprmn fPyisadAtooy Stat Astronomy, and Physics of Department address: Present rsn drs:Ktst nvriy oy,1884 Jap 108-8641 Tokyo, University, Kitasato address: Present .Kurimoto, Y. esrmn fnurlcretcoherent current neutral of Measurement .O Wascko, O. M. .H Shaevitz, H. M. 1 .Guzowski, P. ntttd iiadAtsEege,UiesttAutonoma Universitat Energies, d’Altes Fisica de Institut .Nakaya, T. .B .Mahn, M. B. K. 8 .B Mills, B. G. .K Kobayashi, K. Y. .Djurcic, Z. aik bevtr,IsiuefrCsi a eerh Un Research, Ray Cosmic for Institute Observatory, Kamioka 12 .Tayloe, R. 14 emauetertoo h eta urn coherent current neutral the of ratio the measure We ncro yamo etioba ihaeaeeeg . GeV. 0.8 energy average with beam neutrino muon inclusive a by carbon on coherent etost e(1 be to sections ASnmes 31.g 36.e 53.t 95.55.Vj 25.30.Pt, 13.60.Le, 13.15.+g, numbers: PACS measurement. pion eateto hsc n srnm,LusaaSaeUnive State Louisiana Astronomy, and Physics of Department 18 13 eateto hmsr n hsc,Pru nvriyCal University Purdue Physics, and Chemistry of Department h cBoEClaoainrprsamaueeto neutra of measurement a reports Collaboration SciBooNE The nttt eFsc opsua,Uiesddd aecaa Valencia de Universidad Corpuscular, Fisica de Instituto 15 5 eateto hsc,MsahstsIsiueo Technol of Institute Massachusetts Physics, of Department ihEeg ceeao eerhOgnzto KK,Tsuk (KEK), Organization Research Accelerator Energy High 16 5 Universit hsc eatet an aysUiest fMinnesota, of University Mary’s Saint Department, Physics .L Alcaraz-Aunion, L. J. 6 6 3 2 17 .B White, B. H. 10 π π eateto hsc,Uiest fClrd,Budr Co Boulder, Colorado, of University Physics, of Department .Hanson, A. 3 7 .A Shibata, T.-A. eateto hsc,TkoIsiueo ehooy Toky Technology, of Institute Tokyo Physics, of Department 9 11 0 0 3 7 6 eerhCne o omcNurns nttt o Cosmic for Institute Neutrinos, Cosmic for Center Research eateto hsc,Clmi nvriy e ok Y10 NY York, New University, Columbia Physics, of Department .J Taylor, J. I. .Dore, U. eateto hsc,IdaaUiest,Bomntn I Bloomington, University, Indiana Physics, of Department .Napora, R. rdcinhsbe mrvdb eetn eolpoosfr protons recoil detecting by improved been has production eateto hsc,Ipra olg odn odnSW7 London London, College Imperial Physics, of Department rdcini acltdt e0 be to calculated is production .Mitsuka, G. a ` 10 3, 11 4 iRm aSpez,Dpriet iFsc n NN I-0018 INFN, and Fisica di Dipartimento Sapienza, La Roma di eateto hsc,KooUiest,Koo6680,J 606-8502, Kyoto University, Kyoto Physics, of Department . em ainlAclrtrLbrtr;Btva L60510, IL Batavia, Laboratory; Accelerator National Fermi 17 ‡ 16 o lmsNtoa aoaoy o lms M855 USA 87545, NM Alamos, Los Laboratory; National Alamos Los .Mariani, C. .Kobilarcik, T. ± 15 nvriyo oy,Ksia hb 7-52 Japan 277-8582, Chiba Kashiwa, Tokyo, of University 7 4 .Hayato, Y. 0 14 .A Finley, A. D. .J Wilking, J. M. 6, . 17 24) 9, †† .Nienaber, P. § .Sorel, M. × 1 .J Tesarek, J. R. .Miyachi, Y. .J Brice, J. S. 3 10 TeSioN Collaboration) SciBooNE (The .Masuike, S. − 4 2 8 h ai fcagdcretcoherent current charged of ratio The . .Kubo, H. .Hiraide, K. 18 Dtd a ,2010) 4, May (Dated: etiobeam neutrino 4 2, 16 .J Franke, J. A. .J Stefanski, J. R. Ray c an ‡ 17, 4 .Orme, D. . .Yokoyama, M. ry, 14 ty, 4 .Bugel, L. r- ¶ e 17 +0 − 10 .Uchida, Y. .Mizugashira, S. 0 .Matsuoka, K. . . 10, 30 28 .C Louis, C. W. h owr direction. forward the ulo eolocr n the and no nucleus; occurs entire pro- recoil an pion nucleon with coherent interacts neutrino In the have duction, GeV [1]. 1 discussion around significant energies inspired neutrino at neutrinos muon ‡‡ oy 1-03 Japan 113-0033, Tokyo sn u ulse hre urn coherent current charged published our using , π † eBreoa -89 eltra(acln) Spain (Barcelona), Bellaterra E-08193 Barcelona, de rsn drs:Dprmn fPyis nvriyo Toky of University Physics, of Department address: Present 0 10 o hre urn C)chrn inproduction, pion coherent (CC) current charged For eetmaueet fchrn inpouto by production pion coherent of measurements Recent π .Jover-Manas, G. 3 13 0 rdcino abni few-GeV a in carbon on production .Otani, M. .Giganti, C. rdcint oa hre urn cross current charged total to production 4 .Catala-Perez, J. 6 .Takei, H. 10, vriyo oy,Gf 0-25 Japan 506-1205, Gifu Tokyo, of iversity .Vnd Water, de Van R. dCI,E401Vlni,Spain Valencia, E-46071 CSIC, nd g,Cmrde A019 USA 02139, MA Cambridge, ogy, ‡‡ st,BtnRue A783 USA 70803, LA Rouge, Baton rsity, 10 11 mt amn,I 62,USA 46323, IN Hammond, umet, 17 urn coherent current l .P Zeller, P. G. b,Iaai3500,Japan 305-0801, Ibaraki uba, h eaaino oeetfrom coherent of separation The .T McGary, T. V. .F Loverre, F. P. 10 ioa N597 USA 55987, MN Winona, .D Moore, D. C. .INTRODUCTION I. 15, 17, .D Russell, D. A. oao839 USA 80309, lorado mresonant om 5-51 Japan 152-8551, o ∗ 1 70,USA 47405, N ∗∗ a Research, Ray .Karagiorgi, G. .J Gomez-Cadenas, J. J. 18 .K Tanaka, H.-K. π 2,USA 027, A,UK 2AZ, USA + .Cheng, G. 11 apan 11 onurlcurrent neutral to oe Italy Rome, 5 n .D Zimmerman D. E. and 15 4 13 .J Walding, J. J. π π π .Nakajima, Y. 0 .Ludovici, L. 0 0 4 .Metcalf, W. production. ed ob mte in emitted be to tends production .Sanchez, F. 3 13 13 .M Conrad, M. J. .Katori, T. .Tanaka, M. 18 15 6 10 12 1 7 5 2 13 o, 2 both K2K and SciBooNE set limits on the ratio of CC range detector. We use SciBar as the neutrino target as coherent pion production to the total CC cross sections well as the particle tracker for this analysis. SciBar con- near 1 GeV[2, 3], These published upper limits are sig- sists of 14336 polystyrene (C8H8) scintillator bars. The nificantly lower than those predicted by the Rein and scintillators are arranged vertically and horizontally to Sehgal model [6, 7] which is widely used for many neu- construct a 3 × 3 × 1.7 m3 volume with a total mass of trino oscillation experiments. Meanwhile, evidence for 15 tons. neutral current (NC) coherent pion production with neu- As shown in Fig. 1, NC π0 production is observed as trino energy less than 2 GeV has been reported by the two isolated tracks in SciBar due to two gamma rays, MiniBooNE Collaboration [8]. The SciBooNE collabora- coming from the decay of the π0, converted into two e+e− tion also reported nonzero NC coherent pion production pairs. The background events stem from sources both [9] although the result is only 1.6 standard deviations internal and external to SciBar. Internal backgrounds above zero coherent production. Currently there is no are neutrino interactions other than NCπ0 (mainly CC) theoretical model which can accommodate all of these within SciBar. External backgrounds come from neutrino recent measurements. Further experimental inputs may interactions in the material outside of the detector vol- help the development of theoretical models. ume (dirt background events) as well as cosmic rays. To NC coherent pion production at neutrino energies reduce these background events, several event selections around 1 GeV is also important for neutrino oscillation are performed before extracting coherent π0s. experiments as a substantial contribution to NC π0 pro- To reject CC background events, identifying muons duction (NCπ0). The largest contribution to NCπ0 is is paramount. We identify the following three types of NC resonant pion production, in which the neutrino in- tracks as muons and reject such events, (i) tracks escap- teracts with a single nucleon in the target nucleus and ing from the side of SciBar, (ii) tracks stopping in SciBar excites it to a baryon resonance; the resonant decay pro- with delayed timing hits due to the decay electrons and duces a pion and a nucleon. NC π0 production is the (iii) tracks penetrating the electromagnetic calorimeter largest νµ-induced background in neutrino experiments 0 located at the downstream of SciBar. For the dirt back- searching for νµ → νe oscillations. NCπ events cannot be distinguished from νe signal events when, for example, one of the two photons associated with π0 → γγ is not detected. Both MiniBooNE’s and SciBooNE’s previous measurements of NC coherent pion production were performed using only emitted π0 kinematics. However, in addition to the π0 kinematics, the absence of a recoil nucleon is a clear and less model-dependent feature of coherent pion production. In SciBooNE, detection of the recoil nucleon is possible using the fully active and fine-grained vertex detector, SciBar. In this paper, we report a measurement of NC coherent π0 production using a new analysis method in which the lack of recoil nucleons is used to extract the fraction of coherent pions within the inclusive π0 dataset. SciBooNE’s full neutrino data set, corresponding to 0.99 × 1020 protons on target, is used. To simulate coherent π production, the Rein and Sehgal model [6], including lepton mass corrections [7], is used. The axial vector mass MA and the nuclear radius parameter R0 used in the model are set to 1.0 GeV/c2 and 1.0 fm, respectively. These are the same values used in previous SciBooNE papers [3, 9]. This paper updates our previous result[9], so, not only the coherent π production model but all simulations and the experimental setup used in this analysis are the same FIG. 1: Event display of a typical NCπ0 event candidate as previously described. in SciBooNE data. The neutrino beam runs from left to right in this figure, encountering SciBar, the electromagnetic calorimeter (EC) and the muon range detector (MRD), in that π0 order. The circles on SciBar indicate ADC hits for which the II. NC EVENT SELECTIONS area of the circle is proportional to the energy deposition in that channel. This event display shows the electromagnetic The SciBooNE detector is comprised of three subsys- shower tracks from the pair conversions of the two π0 decay tems: a scintillating bar neutrino vertex detector called photons. SciBar, an electromagnetic calorimeter, and a muon 3 ground rejection, we use the upstream part of SciBar as a incoherent π0 events is reduced from 71% in the sample charged particle veto and require that the reconstructed with vertex activity to 35% in the sample without vertex vertices of both gamma ray candidates be in SciBar. Fi- activity. nally, we require that the reconstructed invariant mass of two gamma ray candidates be close to the π0 mass. All selections are identical to those used in the previous analysis [9] and are described in detail there. Data After event selection, 657 events remain. Subtract- 200 NC coherent π0 ing the estimated background of 240 events (202 internal NC other π0 with n and 38 external) yields 417 signal events. The MC ex- NC other π0 with p π0 pectation is 368 events. The numbers and distributions Entries / 1 MeV Int. BG with obtained by the MC simulation are normalized with the Int. BG without π0 0 CC data sample [9]. The purity of NC π production 100 Dirt after all event selections is estimated to be 61%. The efficiency for NCπ0 production is estimated to be 5.3%. The efficiency for NC coherent π0production, incoherent π0 production1 with recoil neutron and with recoil proton are estimated to be 7.6%, 6.2% and 4.5%2. 00 10 20 Vertex Activity (MeV) III. COHERENT π0 EVENT SELECTION

In NC coherent pion production, there is no recoil nu- FIG. 2: Vertex activity after all event selections: the con- π0 π0 cleon in the final state since the π0 is produced by the tribution from NC coherent , incoherent NC with recoil neutrons, incoherent NCπ0 with recoil protons, internal back- neutrino interacting with the whole nucleus. Conversely, 0 grounds with a π in the final state, internal background with- a recoiling nucleon should be present in a resonant pion π0 0 out a in the final state and “dirt” background events are event. To separate the NC coherent π events from the shown separately for the MC simulation. NC resonant π0 events, recoil protons in the final state are used. The recoil protons are detected by their large energy deposition near the neutrino interaction vertex, so-called vertex activity. We search for the maximum IV. DATA ANALYSIS deposited energy in a scintillator strip around the reconstructed vertex, an area of 40 cm × 40 cm in each view. The choice of 40 cm (±20 cm from the reconstructed ver- When a neutrino interacts with the entire nucleus, the tex) for the area is based on the vertex resolution which is following relation should be satisfied: 0 approximately 12 cm for each direction (x,y and z). A π 1 at typical SciBooNE energies travels, on average, ∼20 nm > R, (1) before decaying, so the reconstructed intersection of the |t| gamma tracks is a good estimate of the neutrino inter- where t and R are the four-momentum transfer to the action vertex. Figure 2 shows the maximum deposited target nucleus from the neutrino and the radius of target energy distribution after all selections. Most of the co- nucleus, respectively. This means that the cross section herent π0 contribution is peaked at zero while the other 0 decreases rapidly when 1/|t| become smaller than R. Us- π events have high energy activity due to recoil pro- ing Eq. 1, we can deduce tons. Events with energy deposition greater than 2 MeV are considered to have activity at the vertex. Note that 1 E 0 (1 − cos θ 0 ) < ∼ 100 MeV, (2) incoherent pion production with a neutron recoil leaves π π R no vertex activity unless the neutron kicks off protons in the region where we search for the energy deposit. Based following Ref. [10]. In this equation, Eπ0 and θπ0 are on our MC simulation, the fraction of proton recoils in all the π0 energy and direction with respect to the neutrino beam, respectively. From this fact, we can determine the fraction of coherent π0 production using the recon- 0 rec rec structed π kinematic variable Eπ0 (1 − cos θπ0 ), where 1 π0 π0 rec 0 NC incoherent production is defined as all NC events except Eπ0 is the reconstructed π energy calculated as the sum for coherent π0 production. After event selections, 89% of the of the reconstructed energies of two gamma ray candi- incoherent events come from resonant pion production and the rec 0 dates and θ 0 is the reconstructed π direction with re- rest come from deep inelastic scattering. π 2 High track multiplicity around the neutrino interaction vertex spect to the neutrino beam axis. rec rec due to the proton recoil can cause mis-reconstruction of the We simultaneously fit two Eπ0 (1 − cos θπ0 ) distribu- event. tions, with and without the vertex activity, with three 4 templates made by dividing the final MC sample into NC 0 0 coherent π , NC resonant π and background samples. Data Two parameters, Rcoh and Rinc scale the NC coherent NC coherent π0 0 0 π and NC incoherent π templates independently. The NC other π0 with n background sample is fixed to the value of the MC pre- NC other π0 with p diction although the systematic errors on the background Int. BG with π0 prediction are taken into account. The expected number 50 Int. BG without π0

rec rec Entries / 25 MeV of events in the i-th bin in the Eπ0 (1 − cos θπ0 ) distri- Dirt bution is expressed as:

exp coh inc BG Ni = Rcoh × Ni + Rinc × Ni + Ni . (3)

The ﬁt minimizes the expression:

obs exp 0 2 f(N ; N ) 0 200 400 χ = −2 ln , (4) rec rec obs obs E (1-cos θ ) (MeV) f(N ; N ) π0 π0 where N obs(exp) represents the observed (expected) number of events in all bins Data (N obs(exp),N obs(exp),...,N obs(exp)) and f(N obs; N exp) is 1 2 N NC coherent π0 the Poisson likelihood to find N obs events when N exp NC other π0 with n events are expected. When the systematic errors for NC other π0 with p each bin and their correlation expressed with covariance 50 0 3 Int. BG with π matrix V (j, k = 1, 2,...,N(= 39)) are given, the Entries / 25 MeV jk π0 likelihood is expressed as Int. BG without Dirt N obs Ni −xi obs exp xi e f(N ; N ; V )= A dxi Z N obs! hiY=1 i i N N 1 exp −1 exp × exp − (xj − N )V (xk − N ) ,(5) 0 2 j jk k 0 200 400 h Xj=1 kX=1 i Erec(1-cos θ0 ) (MeV) π0 π0 where A is a normalization constant. The details of the systematic errors and the calculation of the integral are rec rec described in Ref. [9]. The result of the fit is: FIG. 3: The Eπ0 (1 − cos θπ0 ) distributions after fitting with (top) and without (bottom) vertex activity. Rcoh = 0.96 ± 0.20, (6)

Rinc = 1.24 ± 0.13. (7) The ratio of the NC coherent π0 production to the total rec rec CC cross sections from the MC prediction based on the The Eπ0 (1 − cos θπ0 ) distribution after the fitting is shown in Figure 3. The χ2 per degree of freedom (DOF), Rein and Sehgal model is 1.21 × 10−2. Hence, the cross before the fit is 30.8/39 = 0.79, and it is 26.6/37 = 0.72 section ratios are measured to be: after the fit. Figure 4 shows three contours corresponding 0 0 σ(NCcohπ ) σ(NCcohπ )MC to 68%, 90% and 99% confidence level. The statistical er- = Rcoh × , ror and all systematic errors are included in the errors of σ(CC) σ(CC)MC −2 Rcoh and Rinc. Without the systematic errors, we obtain = Rcoh × 1.21 × 10 , 0.98±0.18(stat.) and 1.19±0.10(stat.) for Rcoh and Rinc, = (1.16 ± 0.24) × 10−2, (8) respectively. Hence, the uncertainty of the measurement is dominated by the statistical uncertainty. Figures 5 and 0 where Rcoh is 0.96±0.20. The mean neutrino energy for 6 show the distributions of the reconstructed π momen- NC coherent π0 events in the sample is estimated4 to tum and direction with and without the vertex activity after fitting.

4 In the previous paper [9], the mean neutrino energy was 1.0 GeV despite using the same event sample as this paper. This is due to 3 The total number of bins for the two distributions is 40 and there a different definition of average neutrino energy. In the previous is one bin without entries. We do not include the empty bin in paper, we used mean neutrino energy of all events passing the se- the fit. lection cuts in the MC simulation while, in this paper, we divide 5

200 coh 2 Data R 68 % NC coherent π0 NC other π0 with n 90 % NC other π0 with p Int. BG with π0

100 π0 1 99 % Entries / 80 MeV/c Int. BG without Dirt

0 00 500 0 1 2 Reconstructed π0 Momentum (MeV/c) R inc

FIG. 4: The contours corresponding to 68%, 90% and 99% Data conﬁdence level for the ﬁtted values of the scaling parameters; 100 NC coherent π0 the number of degrees of freedom is 2. NC other π0 with n

NC other π0 with p

Int. BG with π0 be 0.8 GeV. The fractional error of this cross section ra- Int. BG without π0 Entries / 80 MeV/c tio is 21% while the previous result’s fractional error is 50 Dirt 60% ((0.68 ± 0.41) × 10−2). Hence, the result has been improved by a factor of three with the new analysis using vertex activity. This result is 5.8 standard deviations above the no coherent production assumption. The measured cross section is also consistent with the MC pre- 0 diction based on the Rein and Sehgal model [6]. The 0 500 0 result is evidence of non-zero coherent pion production Reconstructed π Momentum (MeV/c) via neutral current interactions at mean neutrino energy 0.8 GeV. FIG. 5: Reconstructed π0 momentum distributions after ﬁt- ting with the vertex activity (top) and without vertex activity (bottom). V. DISCUSSION

A. Comparison with the CC measurement is measured to be

σ(CCcohπ+) σ(CCcohπ+) σ(NCcohπ0) The SciBooNE collaboration measured the ratio of the = / , CC coherent pion to total CC production as σ(NCcohπ0) σ(CC) σ(CC) +0.30 = 0.14−0.28. (10) σ(CCcohπ+) σ(CC) In contrast, the Rein and Sehgal model [6] as well as + 0 = (0.16 ± 0.17(stat)+0.30(sys)) × 10−(9)2, many other models predict σ(CCcohπ )/σ(NCcohπ )= −0.27 2 without the lepton mass correction [11]. Even if we take it into account that the neutrino energy of the CC at 1.1 GeV [3]. According to Eq. 8 and 9, the ratio of measurement (1.1 GeV) is higher than that of NC mea- CC coherent pion production to NC coherent production surement (0.8 GeV), the corrected ratio ends up with a smaller value because the cross section increases with neutrino energy. So far, there is no model which can accommodate our measurement of the CC/NC coher- the selected neutrino energy distribution by the coherent cross section for each neutrino energy bin before calculating the aver- ent pion production ratio at these energies, although the age of the distribution. The latter method matches SciBooNE’s measurement of the ratio at higher energies ([12], ∼7 CC coherent result [3] GeV) is consistent with 2. 6

herent pion to NC single π0 production is found to be:

0 Data Rcoh × σ(NCcohπ )MC 0 0 Entries NC coherent π0 Rcoh × σ(NCcohπ )MC + Rinc × σ(NCresπ )MC

NC other π0 with n = (17.9 ± 4.1)%, (12)

NC other π0 with p 100 Int. BG with π0 where we assume that Rinc scales the NC single resonant π0 production (although R actually scales all incoher- Int. BG without π0 inc ent π0 production including the multi meson production). Dirt In fact, single resonant π0 production is dominates the incoherent π0 sample, comprising 81% after event selections. According to Eq. 11 and 12, the SciBooNE measurement agrees with the MiniBooNE result within un- certainties. It should be noted that MiniBooNE uses a 0 -1 0 1 CH2 target and includes diffractive hydrogen scattering cos θ rec π0 in their simulation while SciBooNE uses a CH target and does not include diffractive hydrogen scattering in the simulation. However, the effect of these differences is less Data than 10%, which is much smaller than the uncertainty of π0 Entries NC coherent the SciBooNE measurement (23%). NC other π0 with n 100 π0 NC other with p VI. CONCLUSION Int. BG with π0 Int. BG without π0 In conclusion, we have observed NC coherent π0 pro- 50 Dirt duction at mean neutrino energy 0.8 GeV. The ratio of the NC coherent π0 production to the total CC cross sections is measured to be 1.16 ×10−2 based on the Rein and Sehgal model. Our measurement confirms the previous MiniBooNE result. The ratio of CC coherent π+ to NC 0 0 +0.30 -1 0 1 coherent π production is calculated to be 0.14−0.28 us- cos θ rec π0 ing SciBooNE’s previous CC coherent pion measurement while many models predict 2 as this ratio. We know of no model that can accommodate our measurement of the rec CC/NC coherent pion production ratio. FIG. 6: The cos θπ0 distributions after fitting with the vertex activity (top) and without vertex activity (bottom).

VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

B. Comparison with the MiniBooNE measurement We acknowledge the Physics Department at Chonnam National University, Dongshin University, and Seoul Na- tional University for the loan of parts used in SciBar and The MiniBooNE collaboration measured the ratio of the help in the assembly of SciBar. We wish to thank NC coherent pion to NC single π0 production to be: the Physics Departments at the University of Rochester and Kansas State University for the loan of Hamamatsu σ(NCcohπ0) PMTs used in the MRD. We gratefully acknowledge sup- σ(NCcohπ0)+ σ(NCresπ0) port from Fermilab as well as various grants, contracts = (19.5 ± 1.1(stat) ± 2.5(sys))%, (11) and fellowships from the MEXT and JSPS (Japan), the INFN (Italy), the Ministry of Science and Innovation and CSIC (Spain), the STFC (UK), and the DOE and below 2.0 GeV [8], where σ(NCcohπ0) is the cross section NSF (USA). This work was supported by MEXT and for coherent π0 production and σ(NCresπ0) is the cross JSPS with the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research A section for exclusive NC resonant single π0 production. 19204026, Young Scientists S 20674004, Young Scien- The qualifier “exclusive” in the latter cross section defini- tists B 18740145, Scientific Research on Priority Areas tion by the MiniBooNE collaboration refers to a neutrino “New Developments of Flavor Physics”, and the global interaction produced in the resonant channel and with a COE program “The Next Generation of Physics, Spun 0 single π in the final state. Using our fit result (Rcoh, from Universality and Emergence”. The project was sup- Rinc) shown in Eq. 6, for SciBooNE, the ratio of NC co- ported by the Japan/U.S. Cooperation Program in the 7

ﬁeld of High Energy Physics and by JSPS and NSF under the Japan-U.S. Cooperative Science Program.

[1] J.G. Morﬁn, et al. [SciBooNE Collaboration] Proceedings [arXiv:hep-ph/0606185]. of NuInt09 (2009), doi:10.1063/1.3274173. [8] A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. [MiniBooNE Collaboration], [2] M. Hasegawa et al. [K2K Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. Phys. Lett. B 664, 41 (2008) [arXiv:0803.3423 [hep-ex]]. 95, 252301 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ex/0506008]. [9] Y. Kurimoto et al. [SciBooNE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. [3] K. Hiraide et al. [SciBooNE Collaboration] Phys. Rev. D D 81, 033004 (2010). 78, 112004 (2008). [10] K. S. Lackner, Nucl. Phys. B 153, 526 (1979). [4] K. Hiraide et al. [SciBooNE Collaboration] Proceedings [11] S. Boyd, S. Dytman, E. Hernandez, J. Sobczyk and of NuInt09 (2009), arXiv:0909.5127v1[hep-ex]. R. Tacik, AIP Conf. Proc. 1189, 60 (2009). [5] H.-K. Tanaka et al. [SciBooNE Collaboration] Proceed- [12] H. J. Grabosch et al. [SKAT Collaboration], Z. Phys. C ings of NuInt09 (2009), arXiv:0910.4754[hep-ex]. 31, 203 (1986). [6] D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Nucl. Phys. B 223, 29 (1983). [7] D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Phys. Lett. B 657, 207 (2007)