DOCSLIB.ORG

JANUARY to JUNE Thailand Burma Border Consortium TBBC Would Like to Thank Its Donors and Members for Their Generous Contributions and Support Expected in 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JANUARY to JUNE Thailand Burma Border Consortium TBBC Would Like to Thank Its Donors and Members for Their Generous Contributions and Support Expected in 2012 PROGRAMME REPORT 2012 JANUARY TO JUNE Thailand Burma Border Consortium TBBC would like to thank its Donors and Members for their generous contributions and support expected in 2012 The Netherlands Republic of China (Taiwan) Friends and Families Of TBBC PROGRAMME REPORT JANUARY TO JUNE 2012 TBBC Key Achievements January to June 2012 Objective 1: Pursue change leading to durable solutions while ensuring a protective environment for displaced people of Burma/Myanmar. Preparedness for return TBBC has begun the process of refocusing its programme on preparedness for return rather than ‘care & main- tenance’. TBBC has facilitated meetings between the international community and non-state actors to assist information exchange and build understanding. Refugee and Camp Committees have identified six key areas for consideration with a view to return: Information, Documentation, Relief Assistance, Livelihoods, Security and Participation. Peace building support After preliminary agreements have been negotiated between non-state armed groups and the Government of the Union of Myanmar, mutual trust building and information exchange is essential to further political progress TBBC has provided logistical support for the ongoing transition from ceasefires into a broader peace process. TBBC facilitated consultations between non-state armed groups, registered political parties and civil society groups from both sides of the border about the negotiations so far and the next steps towards a political settlement. Objective 2: Increase self-reliance by promoting and supporting livelihood opportunities. CAN Programme “Community household garden allotments are probably the single best way to prepare refugees for repatria- tion... This is also a good return on donor’s investment, and is a clear indication that community gardens are increasing self-reliance”. Dr Julian Gonsalves, who undertook a recent review of the CAN project (June 2012). Gardening is contributing on average: Baht 832/month/household; comprising an expenditure saving of Baht 457/month and monthly income of Baht 375/month. Cluster members are consuming vegetables an estimated 5.5 times a week. Income Generation (EDG- Over 75% of EDGSLP participants, of whom 67% are women, are returning an average profit of 35% in all 3 SLP) camps with average daily sales of Baht 382. 46 Savings and Loans groups with 344 members have formed, saving a total of Baht 350,000 between them. Shelter Livelihoods 7,000 bamboo plants, 3,000 eucalyptus plants and 2,000 other trees were planted. 545 bamboo poles have been treated and 200 concrete posts produced, making houses more durable. Local procurement of roof thatch has provided income for refugees, improved relations with surrounding villages, saved costs and resulted in improved thatch quality. Objective 3: Ensure continued access to adequate, nutritious food and appropriate shelter while prioritising support for the most vulnerable. Community Managed Tar- Following ration cuts, CMT pilots have commenced in Mae La, Ban Don Yang, Mae La Oon and Mae Ra Ma geting (CMT) Luang, aimed at providing extra support for an estimated 15% most vulnerable refugees and removing well-off refugees from the food assistance programme. The communities have demonstrated ownership of the process and, with input from an advisory group, are developing inclusion and exclusion criteria which will be finalised through community consultations. Objective 4: Strengthen mutually accountable community – based management which ensures equity, diversity and gender balance. Karen Refugee Committee KRC 2013 Election Guidelines have been finalised. A ballot system will now be used at all levels. At the Section (KRC) Election Guidelines Committee level, all refuges over 20 years will be able to vote, regardless of their registration status. At the Refugee Committee and Camp Committee level, unregistered refugees must have lived in camp for at least five years to be eligible to vote. Evaluation of the Camp A Canadian/ Australian government commissioned evaluation concluded that the refugees’ own assessment Management Model of current camp management structure was for the most part very positive across all nine camps and across all sub-groups (minorities, women and youth). Specific concerns were identified in some camps, and areas for improvement identified more generally in all camps, but none of these put into question the viability and effectiveness of the model. Provisional recommendations include formal recognition of TBBC’s de facto leader- ship in supporting Camp Management and allocation of adequate financial resources for capacity building and operations. Objective 5: Develop TBBC organisational structure and resources to anticipate and respond to changes, challenges and opportunities. Strategy In consideration of the changing political context, TBBC has embarked on a new strategic planning process for the period of 2013-15, centred around three phases of repatriation: preparedness, return and reintegration for refugee and displaced persons. ii Thailand Burma Border Consortium TBBC JANUARY TO JUNE 2012 PROGRAMME REPORT Introduction This report describes the programme and activities of the Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC) during the period January to June 2012. TBBC is currently a consortium of ten international Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) from eight coun- tries. TBBC’s main focus is to provide food, shelter and capacity-building support to Burmese refugees and internally displaced persons through community managed programmes. It also engages in research into the root causes of displacement and refugee outflows. Membership is open to other NGOs with similar interests. TBBC’s head office is in Bangkok, with field offices in the border towns of Mae Hong Son, Mae Sariang, Mae Sot, Umphang and Kan- chanaburi. TBBC’s programme evolves as circumstances change. In recent years increasing emphasis has been placed on pro- moting self-reliance of displaced people, including the support of livelihood activities. Following dramatic political reforms in Burma/Myanmar which offer the possibility of reconciliation after decades of conflict, the focus during this period has shifted to preparedness for return. TBBC works in cooperation with the Royal Thai Government (RTG) in accordance with regulations of the Minis- try of Interior. It is an Executive Member of the Committee for Coordination of Services to Displaced Persons in Thailand (CCSDPT), committed to coordination of all humanitarian service and protection activities with the other 17 NGO members of CCSDPT and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). TBBC’s pro- grammes are consistent with the CCSDPT/ UNHCR ‘Strategic Framework for Durable Solutions’ and are imple- mented through partnerships with refugee committees, community-based organisations and local groups. TBBC is a signatory to The Code of Conduct for The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Relief, and as such, aims to be impartial and independent from any political viewpoint. TBBC and its member organisations are not affiliated with the political aspirations or foreign policies of any government, group or movement. TBBC’s advocacy work is based on the principles of International Humanitarian and Human Rights law, and is aimed at ensuring that the rights of all TBBC’s beneficiaries and stake-holders are fulfilled regardless of their race, creed, or political affiliation TBBC is a company limited by guarantee in England and Wales, Company number 05255598, Charity Commission number 1109476. TBBC’s registered office is at 35 Lower Marsh, London SE1 7RL. The TBBC budget for 2012 is Baht 1,062 million (USD 34m, EUR 27m). TBBC is responsible for raising all of its own support. Donations can be made through the TBBC website www.tbbc.org. TBBC Strategic Plan Objectives, 2009-2013 Acknowledging recent and ongoing political developments in Burma/Myanmar, TBBC’s Strategic Plan is currently under review for the period 2013 to 2015 and the programme is being reoriented in preparedness for return. This report will follow the Strategic objectives set in the 2009-2013 Strategic Plan which largely remain valid, but will be aligned with the revised Strategic Plan next time. • Pursue change leading to durable solutions while ensuring a protective environment for displaced people of Burma/Myanmar. • Increase self-reliance by promoting and supporting livelihood opportunities. • Ensure continued access to adequate nutritious food and appropriate shelter while prioritising support for the most vulnerable. • Strengthen mutually accountable community-based management which ensures equity, diversity and gender balance. • Develop TBBC organisational structure and resources to anticipate and respond to changes, challenges and opportunities. Key achievements against these objectives in the first half of 2012 are summarised in the Table adjacent. TBBC Thailand Burma Border Consortium iii PROGRAMME REPORT JANUARY TO JUNE 2012 Contents 1. Executive Summary January to June 2012 ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Refugee Situation January to June 2012 ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1. Refugee populations ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Important Facts About the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - Emref
    Important Facts about the 2015 Myanmar General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation (EMReF) 2015 October Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF 1 Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF ENLIGHTENED MYANMAR RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT FOUNDATION (EMReF) This report is a product of the Information Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation EMReF is an accredited non-profit research Strategies for Societies in Transition program. (EMReF has been carrying out political-oriented organization dedicated to socioeconomic and This program is supported by United States studies since 2012. In 2013, EMReF published the political studies in order to provide information Agency for International Development Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010- and evidence-based recommendations for (USAID), Microsoft, the Bill & Melinda Gates 2012). Recently, EMReF studied The Record different stakeholders. EMReF has been Foundation, and the Tableau Foundation.The Keeping and Information Sharing System of extending its role in promoting evidence-based program is housed in the University of Pyithu Hluttaw (the People’s Parliament) and policy making, enhancing political awareness Washington's Henry M. Jackson School of shared the report to all stakeholders and the and participation for citizens and CSOs through International Studies and is run in collaboration public. Currently, EMReF has been regularly providing reliable and trustworthy information with the Technology & Social Change Group collecting some important data and information on political parties and elections, parliamentary (TASCHA) in the University of Washington’s on the elections and political parties. performances, and essential development Information School, and two partner policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Satellite Map of Proposed Project Site
    APPENDIX 6 SATELLITE MAP OF PROPOSED PROJECT SITE Hakha Township, Rim pi Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village A6-1 Falam Township, Webula Village Tract, Chin State Kim Mon Chaung Village A6-2 Webula Village Pa Mun Chaung Village Tedim Township, Dolluang Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village Dolluang Village A6-3 Taunggyi Township, Kyauk Ni Village Tract, Shan State A6-4 Kalaw Township, Myin Ma Hti Village Tract and Baw Nin Village Tract, Shan State A6-5 Ywangan Township, Sat Chan Village Tract, Shan State A6-6 Pinlaung Township, Paw Yar Village Tract, Shan State A6-7 Symbol Water Supply Facility Well Development by the Procurement of Drilling Rig Nansang Township, Mat Mon Mun Village Tract, Shan State A6-8 Nansang Township, Hai Nar Gyi Village Tract, Shan State A6-9 Hopong Township, Nam Hkok Village Tract, Shan State A6-10 Hopong Township, Pawng Lin Village Tract, Shan State A6-11 Myaungmya Township, Moke Soe Kwin Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-12 Myaungmya Township, Shan Yae Kyaw Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-13 Labutta Township, Thin Gan Gyi Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Protection Dike Rainwater Pond (New) : 5 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) : 20 Facilities A6-14 Labutta Township, Laput Pyay Lae Pyauk Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-15 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Irrigation Channel Rainwater Pond (New) : 2 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) Hinthada Township, Tha Si Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-16 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road
    [Show full text]
  • Shan State - Myanmar
    Myanmar Information Management Unit SHAN STATE - MYANMAR Mohnyin 96°40'E Sinbo 97°30'E 98°20'E 99°10'E 100°0'E 100°50'E 24°45'N 24°45'N Bhutan Dawthponeyan India China Bangladesh Myo Hla Banmauk KACHIN Vietnam Bamaw Laos Airport Bhamo Momauk Indaw Shwegu Lwegel Katha Mansi Thailand Maw Monekoe Hteik Pang Hseng (Kyu Koke) Konkyan Cambodia 24°0'N Muse 24°0'N Muse Manhlyoe (Manhero) Konkyan Namhkan Tigyaing Namhkan Kutkai Laukkaing Laukkaing Mabein Tarmoenye Takaung Kutkai Chinshwehaw CHINA Mabein Kunlong Namtit Hopang Manton Kunlong Hseni Manton Hseni Hopang Pan Lon 23°15'N 23°15'N Mongmit Namtu Lashio Namtu Mongmit Pangwaun Namhsan Lashio Airport Namhsan Mongmao Mongmao Lashio Thabeikkyin Mogoke Pangwaun Monglon Mongngawt Tangyan Man Kan Kyaukme Namphan Hsipaw Singu Kyaukme Narphan Mongyai Tangyan 22°30'N 22°30'N Mongyai Pangsang Wetlet Nawnghkio Wein Nawnghkio Madaya Hsipaw Pangsang Mongpauk Mandalay CityPyinoolwin Matman Mandalay Anisakan Mongyang Chanmyathazi Ai Airport Kyethi Monghsu Sagaing Kyethi Matman Mongyang Myitnge Tada-U SHAN Monghsu Mongkhet 21°45'N MANDALAY Mongkaing Mongsan 21°45'N Sintgaing Mongkhet Mongla (Hmonesan) Mandalay Mongnawng Intaw international A Kyaukse Mongkaung Mongla Lawksawk Myittha Mongyawng Mongping Tontar Mongyu Kar Li Kunhing Kengtung Laihka Ywangan Lawksawk Kentung Laihka Kunhing Airport Mongyawng Ywangan Mongping Wundwin Kho Lam Pindaya Hopong Pinlon 21°0'N Pindaya 21°0'N Loilen Monghpyak Loilen Nansang Meiktila Taunggyi Monghpyak Thazi Kenglat Nansang Nansang Airport Heho Taunggyi Airport Ayetharyar
    [Show full text]
  • Mimu875v01 120626 3W Livelihoods South East
    Myanmar Information Management Unit 3W South East of Myanmar Livelihoods Border and Country Based Organizations Presence by Township Budalin Thantlang 94°23'EKani Wetlet 96°4'E Kyaukme 97°45'E 99°26'E 101°7'E Ayadaw Madaya Pangsang Hakha Nawnghkio Mongyai Yinmabin Hsipaw Tangyan Gangaw SAGAING Monywa Sagaing Mandalay Myinmu Pale .! Pyinoolwin Mongyang Madupi Salingyi .! Matman CHINA Ngazun Sagaing Tilin 1 Tada-U 1 1 2 Monghsu Mongkhet CHIN Myaing Yesagyo Kyaukse Myingyan 1 Mongkaung Kyethi Mongla Mindat Pauk Natogyi Lawksawk Kengtung Myittha Pakokku 1 1 Hopong Mongping Taungtha 1 2 Mongyawng Saw Wundwin Loilen Laihka Ü Nyaung-U Kunhing Seikphyu Mahlaing Ywangan Kanpetlet 1 21°6'N Paletwa 4 21°6'N MANDALAY 1 1 Monghpyak Kyaukpadaung Taunggyi Nansang Meiktila Thazi Pindaya SHAN (EAST) Chauk .! Salin 4 Mongnai Pyawbwe 2 Tachileik Minbya Sidoktaya Kalaw 2 Natmauk Yenangyaung 4 Taunggyi SHAN (SOUTH) Monghsat Yamethin Pwintbyu Nyaungshwe Magway Pinlaung 4 Mawkmai Myothit 1 Mongpan 3 .! Nay Pyi Hsihseng 1 Minbu Taw-Tatkon 3 Mongton Myebon Langkho Ngape Magway 3 Nay Pyi Taw LAOS Ann MAGWAY Taungdwingyi [(!Nay Pyi Taw- Loikaw Minhla Nay Pyi Pyinmana 3 .! 3 3 Sinbaungwe Taw-Lewe Shadaw Pekon 3 3 Loikaw 2 RAKHINE Thayet Demoso Mindon Aunglan 19°25'N Yedashe 1 KAYAH 19°25'N 4 Thandaunggyi Hpruso 2 Ramree Kamma 2 3 Toungup Paukkhaung Taungoo Bawlakhe Pyay Htantabin 2 Oktwin Hpasawng Paungde 1 Mese Padaung Thegon Nattalin BAGOPhyu (EAST) BAGO (WEST) 3 Zigon Thandwe Kyangin Kyaukkyi Okpho Kyauktaga Hpapun 1 Myanaung Shwegyin 5 Minhla Ingapu 3 Gwa Letpadan
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Call for Proposals (Cfp)
    Livelihoods and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT) Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Call for Proposals (CfP) Ref no: CfP/LIFT/2016/7/Migration Release date: 19 February 2016 Deadline: 21 March 2016 12:00hrs (noon) Title: Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Duration: Planned start date July 2016, not to go beyond March 2019 Background UNOPS is the Fund Manager for the multi-donor Livelihood and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT), which was established in 2009 to address food insecurity and income poverty in Myanmar. LIFT’s donors are Australia, Denmark, the European Union, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. From the private sector, the Mitsubishi Corporation is a donor. The overall goal of LIFT is to sustainably reduce the number of people living in poverty and hunger in Myanmar. LIFT’s purpose is to improve the incomes and nutrition status of poor rural people by promoting resilient livelihoods and food security. Its designated outcomes are improvements in income, resilience, nutrition, and pro-poor policy developments. LIFT works with implementing partners (IPs), such as international NGOs, national NGOs, United Nations agencies, international organisations, academic and research institutions and the Government of Myanmar. LIFT is currently funding projects at the Union level and in the Ayeyarwady Delta, the Dry Zone, Myanmar’s Uplands and Rakhine State. So far, LIFT has reached over three million people, or roughly six per cent of Myanmar's population, and is active in just under half of the country's townships. The Fund is expected to continue operations until the end of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER May 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • PEACE Info (March 29, 2018)
    PEACE Info (March 29, 2018) − UWSA angered by government’s statement on its NCA stance − Northern Alliance Seeks Continued Support From China in Peace Process Negotiations − Coalition of ethnic armed groups ready to join Panglong summit, awaits invite − If the government officially invited, FPNCC will attend the 21st Century Panglong Conference − Karen Nationals Thahaya Association urges Tatmadaw and KNU to follow NCA on Hpapun issue − RCSS/SSA-S wants negotiation with TNLA once more − Army Brings Case Against Relative of 2 Kachin Villagers Allegedly Killed by Soldiers − Displaced residents in Kyaukme are scared to return home despite fighting stopped − MYANMAR’S REFUGEE AND IDP: Shan dislocation and dispossession after three decades − Burma’s army chief congratulates president-elect − Tough challenges lie ahead for President U Win Myint − Can A New President Pull Myanmar Out of the Quagmire of Conflict? − အစိုးရက ဖိတ္ၾကားပါက ေျမာက္ပိုင္းလက္နက္ကိုင္ ၇ ဖြဲ႔ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးညီလာခံ တက္မည္ − ၂၁ရာစု ပင္လုံတတိယအႀကိမ္ အစည္းအေဝးဖိတ္ရင္ FPNCC တက္မယ္ − ေျမာက္ပိုင္းလက္နက္ကိုင္ခုနစ္ဖြဲ႕ ၂၁ ရာစုပင္လံုတတိယအစည္းအေဝး တက္ေရာက္မည္ − တရား၀င္ ဖိတ္ၾကားပါက ၂၁ ပင္လံုသိုု႔ FPNCC အဖြဲ႔စံု တက္ေရာက္မည္ − FPNCC လက္နက္ကိုင္ ၇ဖဲြ႔ ၂၁ရာစု ပင္လံုတတိယ အစည္းအေ၀းဖိတ္ရင္ တက္ဖို႕ဆုံးျဖတ္ − အစိုးရက တရား၀င္ဖိတ္လာပါက၂၁ ပင္လံုတက္မည္ဟု FPNCC ဆို − ေျမာက္ပိုင္း မဟာမိတ္အဖြဲ႕မ်ား ၂၁ ရာစုပင္လုံတက္ရန္ ဆုံးျဖတ္ − ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးလုပ္ငန္းစဥ္ ေရွ႕ဆက္ႏုိင္ေရး စုိးရိမ္မႈမ်ားေလွ်ာ့ခ်ရန္ RCSS အႀကံေပးတိုက္တြန္း − KNU တြဲဖက္ အေထြေထြအတြင္းေရးမႉး(၂) ပဒိုေစာလွထြန္းႏွင့္ ေတြ႔ဆံုေမးျမန္းျခင္း − RCSS/SSA
    [Show full text]
  • Tie Bombers 18 73 474 135I48 124 X30
    'II Auth: AC Initials 1 June 1945 HEADQUARTRS EASTERN AIR COMAND SOUTH EAST ASIA WEEKLY INTELLIGENCE SUMMh~ARY NUJ3B.R 40 1 June 1945 With the reopening and consolidating of the port of Rarngoon the primary objective in the reconquest of BHt:a has been achieved. Fighting has not yet stopped but all organized resistance has ended. Another chapter of the war in South East Asia has therefore closed, and with it we cease publication o'? this Summary which has been, in part, a record of thc joint efforts of the Amrerican and British Air For- ces in this campaign. In the future, events will take a new course and perhaps this publication will be revived in a diff- erent setting; but, for the moment, suffice it to say that our forces have made a glorious advance along the rocd to Tokyo, We are glad to have had the privilege of recording part of that advance. By command of Lieutenant General STRATEvit1 R: A, T. RICHARDSON Group Captain, RAF Chief of Intelligence Section Office of DC/AS, OPTI i HEADQUARTERS EASTETN AIR 001MAND SOUTH EAST ASIA TO: All Personnel of Eastern Air Command, and all R.A.F. and U.S.A.A.F. Administrative and Service Units Which Have Supported E.A.C. Combat Operations. 1. On 15 December 1943 Eastern Air ommnand was organized as an integrated R.A.F.- A.A.F. air command, to which were also assigned squadrons of the Royal Canadian Air Force and Royal Indian Air Force. At that time I stated our mission and our mutual problems as follows: "A resourceful, able and wily enemy must be blasted from the jungles of Burma and driven from its skies in days to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Inclusion
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 I LIFT Annual Report 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 II III LIFT Annual Report 2020 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank LBVD Livestock Breeding and Veterinary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Department CBO Community-based Organisation We thank the governments of Australia, Canada, the European Union, LEARN Leveraging Essential Nutrition Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and CSO Civil Society Organisation Actions To Reduce Malnutrition project the United States of America for their kind contributions to improving the livelihoods and food security of rural poor people in Myanmar. Their DAR Department of Agricultural MAM Moderate acute malnutrition support to the Livelihoods and Food Security Fund (LIFT) is gratefully Research acknowledged. M&E Monitoring and evaluation DC Donor Consortium MADB Myanmar Agriculture Department of Agriculture Development Bank DISCLAIMER DoA DoF Department of Fisheries MEAL Monitoring, evaluation, This document is based on information from projects funded by LIFT in accountability and learning 2020 and supported with financial assistance from Australia, Canada, the DRD Department for Rural European Union, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, the United Development MoALI Ministry of Agriculture, Kingdom, and the United States of America. The views expressed herein Livestock and Irrigation should not be taken to reflect the official opinion of the LIFT donors. DSW Department of Social Welfare MoE Ministry of Education Exchange rate: This report converts MMK into
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006
    Burma Page 1 of 24 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Burma Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Since 1962, Burma, with an estimated population of more than 52 million, has been ruled by a succession of highly authoritarian military regimes dominated by the majority Burman ethnic group. The current controlling military regime, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), led by Senior General Than Shwe, is the country's de facto government, with subordinate Peace and Development Councils ruling by decree at the division, state, city, township, ward, and village levels. In 1990 prodemocracy parties won more than 80 percent of the seats in a generally free and fair parliamentary election, but the junta refused to recognize the results. Twice during the year, the SPDC convened the National Convention (NC) as part of its purported "Seven-Step Road Map to Democracy." The NC, designed to produce a new constitution, excluded the largest opposition parties and did not allow free debate. The military government totally controlled the country's armed forces, excluding a few active insurgent groups. The government's human rights record worsened during the year, and the government continued to commit numerous serious abuses. The following human rights abuses were reported: abridgement of the right to change the government extrajudicial killings, including custodial deaths disappearances rape, torture, and beatings of
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Armed Actors and Justice Provision in Myanmar
    Ethnic Armed Actors and Justice Provision in Myanmar Brian McCartan and Kim Jolliffe October 2016 Preface As a result of decades of ongoing civil war, large areas of Myanmar remain outside government rule, or are subject to mixed control and governance by the government and an array of ethnic armed actors (EAAs). These included ethnic armed organizations, with ceasefires or in conflict with the state, as well as state-backed ethnic paramilitary organizations, such as the Border Guard Forces and People’s Militia Forces. Despite this complexity, order has been created in these areas, in large part through customary justice mechanisms at the community level, and as a result of justice systems administered by EAAs. Though the rule of law and the workings of Myanmar’s justice system are receiving increasing attention, the role and structure of EAA justice systems and village justice remain little known and therefore, poorly understood. As such, The Asia Foundation is pleased to present this research on justice provision and ethnic armed actors in Myanmar, as part of the Foundation’s Social Services in Contested Areas in Myanmar series. The study details how the village, and village-based mechanisms, are the foundation of stability and order for civilians in most of these areas. These systems have then been built through EAA justice systems, which maintain a hierarchy of courts above the village level. Understanding the continuity and stability of these village systems, and the heterogeneity of the EAA justice systems which work alongside them, is essential for understanding civilians’ experiences of justice and security across Myanmar, as well as the opportunities for positive change that exist in Myanmar’s ongoing peace process and governance reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Dooplaya Field Report: a Quasi-Ceasefire? Developments After the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, from January To
    (i) The Dooplaya Field Report: A quasi-ceasefire? Developments after the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, from January to December 2016 th August 19 , 2017 Field Report August19, 2017 / KHRG #17-1-F1 Dooplaya Field Report: January to December 2016 This field report provides the analysis of the regional situation in Dooplaya District, southeast Myanmar, between January and December 2016. It includes information submitted by KHRG community members on a range of human rights violations and other issues including the military situation and ceasefire concerns, violent abuse, drug usage, development projects, land issues, health and education, and refugee issues. • According to the information listed in a number of reports, during 2016 villagers in Dooplaya District are still concerned about the military situation due to the resurgence of military movement and on-going fighting between the Tatmadaw and Karen ethnic armed groups after the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement [NCA]. Villager’s trust in the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) has decreased since the signing of the NCA. • In terms of the human rights situation in Dooplaya District, villagers are still facing a lack of justice when they experience violent abuse such as torture, rape and killing. The information received highlighted that villagers need more knowledge and awareness on human rights issues given by organisations such as KHRG in order to protect themselves. • Regarding drugs, villagers reported in numbers of situation updates that the illegal trade in yaba [methamphetamine] has rapidly increased in all townships of Dooplaya District; consequently there have been negative social impacts. Many young people, including children and married women became addicted to yaba and they are no longer interested in their education or working for their livelihood which creates burdens for their family.
    [Show full text]