DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2012 15 MESSAGE BASED ANALYSIS ON SIGNALING SYSTEM NUMBER 7 AND ITS COMPARISON WITH MULTI- FREQUENCY CODED SIGNALING Md. Shah Alam1 and Mohammad Rezaul Huque Khan2* Dept. of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh E-mail:
[email protected],
[email protected] Abstract: A message based comparative study (і) Basic call setup, management, and tear between signaling system #7(SS7) and MFC Signaling down. is done. Here the limitations of SS7 and MFC (ii) Wireless services such as Personal signaling are also studied. The reasons for the transition from Multi-frequency Coded (MFC) Communications Services (PCS), wireless Signaling to SS7 has been discussed. roaming, and mobile subscriber authentication. Keywords: Common Channel Signaling No.7 (CCS7), R2 (iii) Local Number Portability (LNP). Signaling or Multi-frequency Coded (MFC) Signalin and, (iv) Toll-free (800/888) and toll (900) wireline SS7 message. services. (v) Enhanced call features such as call 1. Introduction waiting, call forwarding, calling party The over increasing demand of name/number display/ restriction/rejection, telecommunication in the world wide and three-way calling. significantly involves telecommunication (vi) Interaction with Network Databases and signaling systems. The Common Channel Service Control Points (SCP) for service Signaling no.7 is usually termed as Signaling control. System No.7 (SS7). The purpose of this paper is (vii) Handling congestion and priorities. to study the signaling systems R2 or MFC, SS7 (viii) Efficient and secure worldwide [1], to find the limitations of the above signaling telecommunications. system, analysis of the signaling systems (R2 SS7 started to make inroads in the 1980‟s and SS7) on the basis of their message format.