The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers Brian Harvey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers Brian Harvey The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers Brian Harvey The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers J^K. Published in association with s~ y? <£J Springer Praxis Publishing PRAXIS Chichester, UK Mr Brian Harvey Terenure Dublin 6W Ireland SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, M.Sc, B.Sc, Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-71354-0 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2007922812 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. © Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services Ltd, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Author's preface ix Acknowledgments xi About the book xii List of figures xiii List of maps xix List of tables xxi List of abbreviations and acronyms xxiii 1 Almost the end 1 The admiration of the world 5 The collapse 7 Back on Mir: the long recovery 11 Almost the end: conclusions 16 2 Building the International Space Station 17 Origins of ISS 17 Paving the way for ISS: the last phases of Mir 19 Winding Mir down: "grief in our hearts" 25 The mark of Cassandra 29 Building the ISS 35 Waiting for Mir 2 37 Delay, delay and delay 39 Zvezda, 12th July 2000 40 Soyuz as lifeboat 43 Space station routine 46 vi Contents Space station depends on Russia 57 Completing the space station 67 Building the International Space Station: conclusions 74 References 75 3 Scientific and applications programs 77 Comsats: the Soviet inheritance 77 Comsats: the new generation 83 Weather satellites 87 Earth resources: Resurs DK, Sich M, Monitor 89 Materials-processing: Foton 94 Science: Koronas, Spektr 96 Small satellites 100 The unmanned program: conclusions 101 References 103 4 Military programs 105 Photo-reconnaissance 106 Close-look: Yantar 4K2 Kobalt 109 Mapping: Yantar 1KFT Kometa 110 Instant intelligence: Yantar 4KS2 Neman Ill Orlets and the rivers: Don and Yenisey 112 Space telescope: Araks 114 Electronic intelligence: Tselina 116 Maritime electronic intelligence: US P Legenda 118 Military communications: Strela, Gonetz, Potok 121 Navigation satellites: Parus, Nadezhda 124 Navigation: GLONASS 127 Military early warning system: Oko, Prognoz 132 The military space program: conclusions 136 References 138 5 Launchers and engines 139 Old reliable 139 New upper stages: Ikar, Fregat 142 Rus program 144 Cosmos 3M 151 Proton and Proton M 155 Proton M 160 Tsyklon 164 Zenit 167 Ukrainian rockets to the Pacific: Zenit 3SL, the Sea Launch 170 Rockot 175 Strela rocket 179 START 180 Contents vii Dnepr 182 Volna, Shtil and relatives 185 New rocket: Angara 187 Russian rocket engines 192 GDL/Energomash: the most powerful rockets in the world 193 RD-180 powers the Atlas 196 Kosberg bureau/KBKhA in Voronezh 199 Isayev bureau/KhimMash 200 And from history, Kuznetsov's NK-33 201 Future launch vehicle and engine programs: Ural, Barzugin 201 Reliability 203 Conclusions: rockets and rocket engines 205 References 205 6 Launch sites 207 Baikonour 208 Plesetsk 221 Svobodny-Blagoveshensk 227 Dombarovska/Yasny 229 Soyuz a Kourou, French Guyana 229 Kapustin Yar: the Volgograd station 234 Alcantara 235 Recovery zones 237 De-orbit zones 244 Other ground facilities 246 Star Town, TsPK 246 Mission control Korolev: TsUP 254 Military mission control 257 Tracking and control 257 Cosmodromes and ground facilities: conclusions 262 References 263 7 The design bureaus 265 Energiya—premier design bureau 266 Chelomei's bureau and derivatives 269 NPO Lavochkin 270 NPO Yuzhnoye: missile lines "like sausages" 273 NPO PM, builder of comsats 276 KB Arsenal: the oldest design bureau 277 TsSKB Samara: continuous production from 1957 277 NPO Polyot 279 Organization of the space program 279 New space agency 281 Russia's space budget 283 From commercialization to space tourism 285 viii Contents Participation in the global commercial space community 293 Cooperation: rogue states 302 Cooperation: China 306 Cooperation: India 310 Organization: conclusions 312 References 313 8 Resurgent—the new projects 315 The federal space plan 317 Replacing the Soyuz: Kliper 318 Return to the moon: Luna Glob 325 Return to Mars: Phobos Grunt 326 Mars 500: no girls please, we're going to Mars 330 Final remarks 334 References 335 Appendix: Launchings 2000-06 337 Index 345 Author's preface The rebirth of the Russian space program marks an important event: 50 years since the first Sputnik was launched on 4th October 1957. At that time, few could have imagined the dramatic events that lay head. The Soviet Union achieved all the great firsts in cosmonautics—the first satellite in orbit, the first animal in orbit, the first laboratory in orbit, the first probe to the Moon, the first probe to photograph its far side, the first soft landing on the moon, the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first spacewalk. Except one, the first human landing on the Moon. In 1964, the Soviet Union decided to contest the decision of the United States to put the first person on the Moon. The Soviet Union engaged in that race far too late, with divided organization, and made a gallant but doomed challenge to Apollo. Undaunted, the Soviet Union rebuilt its space program around orbiting stations, building the first one, Salyut, and then the first permanent home in space, Mir. The Soviet Union still achieved many more firsts: the first lunar rover, the first soft landing on Venus, the first soft landing on Mars, the first recovery of samples from the Moon by automatic spacecraft. The original book in this series Race into space—a history of the Soviet space programme (1988) was written during the heyday of the Soviet space program, when the Soviet Union was launching over a hundred satellites a year and had a vast program for the manned and unmanned exploration of space and its application for practical benefits on Earth. The second book in the series, The new Russian space program (1995) was compiled during the shock adjustment of the former Soviet space program to the strained economic realities of life in the Russian Federation. The new Russian space program took advantage of all the new information that had come to light about Soviet history: thanks to the policy of openness (glasnost) begun by the last president of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, we were now at last able to learn about what had really taken place during the time of the Soviet period, as secrets emerged into the light of day. The third book of this series, Russia in space—the failed frontier? (2001) looked at the Russian space program in the period from 1992, when x Author's preface the Russian Federation came into existence. The title of course posed a question: Had the Russian romance with cosmonautics run its course and "failed"? This book chronicled the decline and difficulties of the 1990s, but also showed how the program had adapted, survived and, sometimes grimly, held on. Now, the fourth book in the series, The rebirth of the Russian space program looks at the Russian space program at a convenient marking point, fifty years after Sputnik. It chronicles developments since the turn of the century, takes a look at the Russian program as it is now and looks toward the future. This account focuses on the years 2000 to 2006. Readers who wish to study the earlier history should return to Race into space (for the Soviet period), The new Russian space programme (for the transition) and Russia in space—the failed frontier? (for the 1990s). By way of definitions, this book covers primarily the Russian Federation—but it does take in those parts of the Ukrainian space program rooted in the old Soviet program. The rebirth of the Russian space program coincides not only with Sputnik but with the announcement by the government of the federation of a space plan to last to 2015, an attempt to reinstitute goal-orientated planning in the program. If one looks at the number of launches per year, Russia remains the leading spacefaring nation in the world. At the same time, it is obvious that the Russian Federation's space program has none of the ambition of the American space program, which has now sent extra­ ordinary missions to all the corners of the solar system and plans to return astronauts to the Moon and send them onward to Mars. Unlike the 1960s and 1980s, present-day Russia has neither the capacity nor the will to challenge American leadership of space exploration (the Chinese probably do, but that is another story). At the same time, Russia will remain one of the world's space superpowers, a builder of space stations, a formidable contributor to the world space industry and science. As this book shows, the Russian space program is full of activity and life.
Recommended publications
  • The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J
    The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J. LePage November 1998 Introduction of Sputnik 1 and 2 in October and November of 1957 changed everything. At the same time NACA and the USAF were studying manned spaceflight (see The Beginnings of The first Sputnik launches were to affect the manned America's Man in Space Program in the October space program in several ways. The impact the 1998 issue of SpaceViews), comparable efforts were launch of Sputnik 1 had on the West led Soviet quietly taking place independently in the Soviet Primer Nikita Khrushchev to exploit space missions Union . As with virtually every other aspect of the for their propaganda value. Development of more Soviet Union's early space program, Chief Designer advanced and spectacular missions like the manned Sergei P. Korolev and his OKB-1 (Experimental satellite program were immediately approved and Design Bureau No. 1) lead the way. All during the placed on the fast track. Also at the insistence of 1950s when Korolev and his colleague, Mikhail K. Khrushchev, Sputnik 2 was launched with a dog on Tikhonravov of NII-4 (Scientific Research Institute board. While thermal control problems marred the No. 4), were pushing their original Earth satellite mission, it did demonstrate that weightlessness would proposal, it also included plans to send probes to the not be a major hazard for a human (see Sputnik 2: Moon and men into orbit. When the satellite The First Animal in Space in the November 1997 proposal was finally adopted by the Soviet issue of SpaceViews). As a result, Korolev scrapped government on January 30, 1956, the lunar probe and his initial, more conservative approach and moved manned satellite projects were also given the green ahead with a much more aggressive plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mir-125 in Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis
    Leukemia (2012) 26, 2011–2018 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/12 www.nature.com/leu SPOTLIGHT REVIEW MiR-125 in normal and malignant hematopoiesis L Shaham1,2, V Binder3,4,NGefen1,5, A Borkhardt3 and S Izraeli1,5 MiR-125 is a highly conserved microRNA throughout many different species from nematode to humans. In humans, there are three homologs (hsa-miR-125b-1, hsa-miR-125b-2 and hsa-miR-125a). Here we review a recent research on the role of miR-125 in normal and malignant hematopoietic cells. Its high expression in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) enhances self-renewal and survival. Its expression in specific subtypes of myeloid and lymphoid leukemias provides resistance to apoptosis and blocks further differentiation. A direct oncogenic role in the hematopoietic system has recently been demonstrated by several mouse models. Targets of miR-125b include key proteins regulating apoptosis, innate immunity, inflammation and hematopoietic differentiation. Leukemia (2012) 26, 2011–2018; doi:10.1038/leu.2012.90 Keywords: microRNA; hematopoiesis; hematological malignancies; acute myeloid leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 21–23-nucleotide non-coding RNAs that nucleotides with the seed region of miR-125b (ebv-miR-BART21-5p, have crucial roles in fundamental biological processes by ebv-miR-BART8 and rlcv-miR-rL1-25). In humans, as in most of the regulating the levels of multiple proteins. They are transcribed genomes, there are two paralogs (hsa-miR-125b-1 on chromosome as primary miRNAs and processed in the nucleus by the RNase III 11 and hsa-miR-125b-2 on chromosome 21), coding for the same endonuclease DROSHA to liberate 70-nucleotide stem loops, the mature sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"
    1995 (32nd) People and Technology - The Case The Space Congress® Proceedings For Space Apr 26th, 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha" Anatoli I. Kiselev General Director Khrunichev, SRPSC Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Kiselev, Anatoli I., "Paper Session II-A - Energy Block of International Space Station "Alpha"" (1995). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 28. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1995-32nd/april-26-1995/28 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENERGY BLOCK OF INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION "ALPHA" Ana10Ji I.Kisclev - General Director K.hrunichcv SRPSC Anatoli i.Nedaivoda - General Designer Valdimir K.Karra.sk - Professor, Design Center Director The international space station "Alpha" consists of the American, Rus­ sian, European and Japanese segments. Its integration in the orbit will take place in November, 1997 starting from the injection of 20-tonn erergy block on the basis of the unified functional c.argo blade (russian abbr1.. "' iation as EFGB) by means of the "Proton" LY. The EFG B is designed by the KHRUNICHEV State Research and Production Space Center (KSRPSC) The orbit hight with the inclination of 51.6 deg for EFGB is so selected thett by the end of December, 1997 it can be decreased upto the hight (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module, IG-01-027
    IG-01-027 AUDIT ACQUISITION OF THE SPACE STATION REPORT PROPULSION MODULE May 21, 2001 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing at (202) 358-1232, or visit www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/issuedaudits.html. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Assistant Inspector General for Auditing Code W NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 NASA Hotline To report fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement contact the NASA Hotline at (800) 424-9183, (800) 535-8134 (TDD), or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/hotline.html#form; or write to the NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, DC 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. Reader Survey Please complete the reader survey at the end of this report or at www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oig/hq/audits.html. Acronyms ATV Autonomous Transfer Vehicle FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation FGB Functional Energy Block GAO General Accounting Office ICM Interim Control Module ISS International Space Station NPD NASA Policy Directive NPG NASA Procedures and Guidelines OIG Office of Inspector General OMB Office of Management and Budget OPTS Orbiter Propellant Transfer System SRR Systems Requirements Review USPM United States Propulsion Module USPS United States Propulsion System W May 21, 2001 TO: A/Administrator FROM: W/Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module Report Number IG-01-027 The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) has completed an Audit of Acquisition of the Space Station Propulsion Module.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2011 A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2 Chad Lee Davis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons, Other Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Chad Lee, "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/965 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Chad Lee Davis entitled "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aerospace Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Venona Special Studies
    - 1 - Venona Project Special Studies Transcribed by Students of the Mercyhurst College Institute for Intelligence Studies Arranged by John Earl Haynes, Library of Congress, 2010 COVER NAMES IN NEW YORK TRAFFIC p. 2 UNIDENTIFIED COVER NAMES IN NEW YORK TRAFFIC p. 86 COVER NAMES IN SAN FRANCISCO TRAFFIC p. 92 COVER NAMES IN WASHINGTON TRAFFIC p. 123 ADDITIONAL COVERNAMES AND RELATED INFORMATION IN DIPLOMATIC TRAFFIC p. 127 REVISED TRANSLATION OF MESSAGE ON ANTENNA-LIBERAL'S WIFE ETHEL p. 135 THE COVERNAMES "ANTENNA" AND "LIBERAL" IN . MESSAGES p. 139 ESSAGES IN . INVOLVING THE COVERNAME"ENORMOZ" AND THE NAMES OF NUCLEAR PHYSICISTS, ETC. p. 147 UNDATED REPORT OF MEREDITH GARDNER p. 155 DEVELOPMENT OF THE “G--“HOMER” [“GOMER”] CASE p. 158 THE KOMAR (KRAVCHENKO) AFFAIR IN . MESSAGES p. 161 REVISED TRANSLATION OF TWO . MESSAGES ON CHANGES IN COVERNAMES p. 170 THE COVERNAME "KARAS" IN. TRAFFIC p. 178 THE COVERNAMES "TÉNOR", "BAS", AND "CHETÁ" (? IN . TRAFFIC p. 181 - 2 - Special Study Cover Names in New York Traffic - 3 - cover-name Message number Date Publication reference S/ or 3/NBF/ 19 N.Y. to M. 812 29053 JKI 06 T1022 1B-1910 0027A ABRAM N.Y. to M. 992 24063 JKR 14 T872√ 1B-7518 0005A JACK SOBLE 1086 06073 JKV 48 T873√ 2A-0011 1957 29113 NNNNNN T939√ 625 04054 JHD 48 T916√ 851 15064 JIJ 40 T10.1√ 1146 10084 JHM 41 T123√ 1251 02094 JHN 12 T301√ (to ChEKh) 0005B 1353 23094 JHO 42 T289√ 1449 12104 JIL 37 T106√ 1754 14124 JHZ 49 T6√ 48 11015 JHV 37 (NSA)T1941 AVGUR 2A-0013 1638 (AUGUR) N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of S.P
    ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Life Sciences Payload Assessment
    Lunar Surface Science Workshop 2020 (LPI Contrib. No. 2241) 5077.pdf LUNAR LIFE SCIENCES PAYLOAD ASSESSMENT. S. C. Sun1, F. Karouia2, M. P. Lera3, M. P. Parra1, H. E. Ray4, A. J. Ricco1, S. M. Spremo1. 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, 3KBR, 4ASRC Federal Space and Defense, Inc. Introduction: The Moon provides a unique site to ISS, including systems that integrate into EXPRESS study living organisms. The fractional gravity and (EXpedite the PRocessing of ExperimentS for Space) unique radiation environment have similarities to Mars Racks or are external space exposure research facilities. and will help us understand how life will respond to These same systems can be the basis for future payload conditions on the red planet. Martian and lunar envi- systems for experiments to be performed beyond Low ronments can be simulated on the ground but not to high Earth Orbit. Such facilities would need to be adapted to fidelity. Altered gravity and increased radiation are dif- be compatible with the new research platforms and ficult to replicate simultaneously, which makes study- function in the harsher radiation environment found out- ing their combined effect difficult. The International side the magnetosphere. If Gateway and a lunar based- Space Station, and previously, the Space Shuttle, pro- lab could provide EXPRESS-compatible interfaces, lev- vided a microgravity environment, and could simulate eraging hardware developed for ISS would be more fea- fractional-g only via an onboard centrifuge. Because sible. the ISS and Space Shuttle orbits were within the Earth’s Gaps in Capabilities: Many of the payload systems magnetosphere, experiments on those platforms have that have been developed require human tending.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Solar Wind Monitor (BMSW): Description and First Results
    Space Sci Rev (2013) 175:165–182 DOI 10.1007/s11214-013-9979-4 Fast Solar Wind Monitor (BMSW): Description and First Results Jana Šafránková · Zdenekˇ Nemeˇ cekˇ · Lubomír Prechˇ · Georgy Zastenker · Ivo Cermákˇ · Lev Chesalin · Arnošt Komárek · Jakub Vaverka · Martin Beránek · Jiríˇ Pavl˚u · Elena Gavrilova · Boris Karimov · Arkadii Leibov Received: 4 September 2012 / Accepted: 19 March 2013 / Published online: 6 April 2013 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Abstract Monitoring of solar wind parameters is a key problem of the Space Weather pro- gram. The paper presents a description of a novel fast solar wind monitor (Bright Monitor of the Solar Wind, BMSW) and the first results of its measurements of plasma moments with a time resolution ranging from seconds to 31 ms. The method of the fast monitoring is based on simultaneous measurements of the total ion flux and ion integral energy spectrum by six nearly identical Faraday cups (FCs). Three of them are dedicated to determination of the ion flow direction, whereas other three equipped with control grids supplied by a re- tarding potential are used for a determination of the density, temperature, and speed of the plasma flow. The paper introduces not only the measuring methods, the FCs design, and modes of operation, but brings the examples of time series of measurements and their com- parison with the observations of other spacecraft as well as the first results of an analysis of frequency spectra of solar wind fluctuations within the ion kinetic scale, examples of rapid measurements at the ramp of an interplanetary shock and investigations of fast variations of alpha particle content.
    [Show full text]
  • World Space Observatory %Uf02d Ultraviolet Remains Very Relevant
    WORLD SPACE OBSERVATORY-ULTRAVIOLET Boris Shustov, Ana Inés Gómez de Castro, Mikhail Sachkov UV observatories aperture pointing mode , Å OAO-2 1968.12 - 1973.01 20 sp is 1000-4250 TD-1A 1972.03 - 1974.05 28 s is 1350-2800+ OAO-3 1972.08 - 1981.02 80 p s 900-3150 ANS 1974.08 - 1977.06 22 p s 1500-3300+ IUE 1978.01 - 1996.09 45 p s 1150-3200 ASTRON 1983.03 - 1989.06 80 p s 1100-3500+ EXOSAT 1983.05 - 1986. 2x30 p is 250+ ROSAT 1990.06 - 1999.02 84 sp i 60- 200+ HST 1990.04 - 240 p isp 1150-10000 EUVE 1992.06 - 2001.01 12 sp is 70- 760 ALEXIS 1993.04 - 2005.04 35 s i 130- 186 MSX 1996.04 - 2003 50 s i 1100-9000+ FUSE 1999.06 - 2007.07 39х35 (4) p s 905-1195 XMM 1999.12 - 30 p is 1700-5500 GALEX 2003.04 - 2013.06 50 sp is 1350-2800 SWIFT 2004.11 - 30 p i 1700-6500 2 ASTROSAT/UVIT UVIT - UltraViolet Imaging Telescopes (on the ISRO Astrosat observatory, launch 2015); Two 40cm telescopes: FUV and NUV, FOV 0.5 degrees, resolution ~1” Next talk by John Hutchings! 3 4 ASTRON (1983 – 1989) ASTRON is an UV space observatory with 80 cm aperture telescope equipped with a scanning spectrometer:(λλ 110-350 nm, λ ~ 2 nm) onboard. Some significant results: detection of OH (H2O) in Halley comet, UV spectroscopy of SN1987a, Pb lines in stellar spectra etc. (Photo of flight model at Lavochkin Museum).5 “Spektr” (Спектр) missions Federal Space Program (2016-2025) includes as major astrophysical projects: Spektr-R (Radioastron) – launched in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexe: Summary of Soviet and Russian Space Science Missions
    Contents Introduction by the authors ..................................... ix Acknowledgments ............................................ xi Glossary .................................................. xiii Terminological and translation notes ..............................xv Reference notes .............................................xvii List of tables ............................................... xix List of illustrations ......................................... xxiii List of figures .............................................xxvii 1 Early space science ........................................... 1 Space science by balloon....................................... 3 Scientific flights into the atmosphere: the Akademik series..............14 Scientific test flights with animals ................................20 The idea of a scientific Earth satellite .............................23 Scientific objectives of the first Earth satellites . ....................25 Key people .................................................25 Instead, Prosteishy Sputnik .....................................27 PS2......................................................29 Object D: the first large scientific satellite in orbit....................33 Early space science: what was learned? ............................37 References .................................................39 2 Deepening our understanding ....................................43 Following Sputnik: the MS series ................................43 Cosmos 5 and Starfish: introducing Yuri Galperin
    [Show full text]