DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcontainer Annual Report 12821B.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transcontainer Annual Report 12821B.Pdf Annual report 2017 Just like sports, business is about building PRELIMINARILY APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS teamwork, setting ambitious goals, and making OF TRANSCONTAINER them happen. In 2017, TransContainer overcame 6 April 2018 Meeting Minutes No. 11 a variety of challenges to achieve strong results. dated 6 April 2018 APPROVED BY THE ANNUAL For more information, see the report. GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING OF TRANSCONTAINER 15 May 2018 Meeting Minutes No. 37 1. COMPANY PROFILE 04 Target business model 06 2017 year in review 2. STRATEGIC REPORT 16 Strategy 30 System of key performance indicators 3. MARKET OVERVIEW 34 Global container 45 The Company’s position in the shipping market industry Dear shareholders and investors, 38 Russian rail container transportation market I am happy to present to you TransContainer’s annual report for 2017. 4. BUSINESS OVERVIEW We have left behind a truly record year. 48 Services 86 Environmental impact Thanks to a growing commercial freight management 55 Assets transportation market, the Company 89 Procurement significantly beat its net profit and 62 Client service and sales 91 Charity margin targets and boosted its operating 72 Human resources 95 Financial review performance. The impressive results were naturally priced in by the stock market, contributing to stronger total shareholder return. 5. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 108 Corporate governance 145 Control and monitoring At the end of 2017, the Board of Directors system 152 Risk management updated the Company’s goals and 111 General meeting of shareholders objectives till 2025 in response to rapidly 157 Disclosure and shareholder 114 Board of Directors and investor relations changing market conditions, while also aligning the existing strategy with the 132 CEO and Executive Board developments in the domestic container 140 Report on remuneration of the market. In my view, we made a crucial Board of Directors, executive bodies and the management decision to focus on improving the efficiency of its key business processes, which is essential for the Company’s competitiveness 6. FINANCIAL REPORT and the entire container market, given the scale of our operations. 164 Statement of the Audit Committee 231 Opinion of the Revision Commission 165 Directors’ responsibility statement I am confident that our management and the Board of Directors will take every step to 166 Consolidated Financial Statements unlock this growth potential and achieve the goals set by the shareholders. 7. APPENDIX 232 Report on compliance with the 290 Global Sustainability Standards Corporate Governance Code (GRI) Sincerely yours, 263 Major transactions and related party 292 Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures transactions PJSC Transcontainer ANDREY STARKOV 264 TransContainer’s corporate risk 293 Administrative details Chairman of the Board of Directors iSales service TransContainer was one of the first rail cargo operators to launch online sales. In two years, the share of e-commerce orders soared from 10% to nearly 97% of domestic transportation volumes – almost a half of the total cargo transportation. In 2018, export, import and transit routes will be integrated into the e-commerce platform. IT Director ROMAN VESELOV see the Add container to basket section on p. 65 COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY Annual report TransContainer | 2017 TARGET BUSINESS MODEL A vertically integrated transport and logistics group, containerised cargo shipper and provider of logistics services in Eurasia. REVENUE BREAKDOWN 87.0% Integrated forwarding and logistics services 3.4% Rail container transportation 3.0% Third-party services relating to cargo transportation and handling TOTAL REVENUE 0.5% Other businesses 65.6BILLION RUB (+27.4%) 0.6% Road transportation 5.5% Terminal handling, bonded warehouse and agent services www.trcont.com NETWORKS PARTNER NETWORK OUR COMPETITIVE PRIORITY IN ADVANTAGES Trains DEVELOPING Vertically integrated THE business model Ships Integrating flatcars, containers SERVICES and terminal assets into a single PORTFOLIO IS platform enables us to deliver Partners’ quality execution in the key vehicles providing integrated elements of the logistics chain, “turnkey” intermodal boost asset performance, and transportation bring about a well-balanced mix Aircraft of own and third-party assets services by using our Terminal network serving as own and third-party a technological platform for assets intermodal transportation OPERATOR ASSET Network-scale operations NETWORK Optimised logistics, declining empty runs, presence in key transportation hubs and key Containers points where freight flows originate and terminate +15.2% Mature domestic and interna- Flatcars transportation using the tional sales and service network Company’s own rolling stock with international segments of end-to-end logistics services Company’s and containers vehicles Extensive and diversified client base Resilience to market shocks, low TERMINAL exposure to any individual client NETWORK or sector, quick adaptation to +5.2% turbulent market conditions Lifting Unique retail client base machines container handling volumes compared to other rail container at the Company’s terminals operators Rail in Russia terminals Mature e-commerce channels Modern, easy-to-use user CLIENT interface NETWORK 70% Accessible feedback system ISALES the share of e-commerce Competitive strength orders Our competitive strength is supported by the quality, Remote diverse structure and availability access suite of the entire portfolio of transportation services ranging from simple mass-market Sales offices services to complex intermodal 1520 mm gauge: status of the larg- transportation solutions. est flatcar and container owner and operator in the 1520 gauge market 1520 mm and a leader in the terminal ser- vices market; economies of scale, transportation availability across the entire 1520 gauge network, access to all client categories Annual report TransContainer | 2017 2017 YEAR IN REVIEW Year of records 2017 proved to be one of the most successful years in the recent history of the Russian container transportation. For more information We are delighted to present TransContainer’s annual report for 2017, which focuses on on the Russian railway our strategy. In this interview, TransContainer’s CEO Petr Baskakov speaks of the main network transportation, see “Market Review” challenges the Company faces and the ways of addressing them, its key objectives, on p. 34 mid-term prospects, and many other things. 2017 results – For TransContainer, the reporting year brought positive developments, with a surge in container transportation volumes driven by an overall expansion of the Russian railway container transportation market (up 19% against the projected 8%). Which of your business segments saw the strongest demand? +19% growth of the Russian – Indeed, the past year was one of the most successful in the recent history of the railway network Russian container transportation, both in terms of growth rates and in absolute terms, container transportation with the Russian railway network transporting a record high of nearly 3.9 mln TEUs. We also saw a change in transportation structure. Over the two previous years, the key market driver was domestic transportation, whereas in 2017, the market was close to its pre-crisis state, with international transportation showing the strongest growth of 31.1%, and domestic transportation lagging behind (up 7.6%). I believe this impressive growth in international transportation was The Company’s investments, RUB bn possible thanks in no small part to our contribution. Last year, we kept working to strengthen our foothold in China, while also launching new transit routes 2018E 12.3 across Mongolia. In the domestic market, the key growth driver was the launch of new 2017 8.1 CRM solutions. 2016 2.4 2015 2.9 In this context, increasing market demand turned out to be one of the toughest challenges 2014 4.5 that we effectively addressed by providing sufficient rolling stock and containers. Hence, despite higher than expected growth rates, we were able to fully meet the demand for container transportation. – How did you tackle the challenges? – First of all, we ensured utilisation of the existing rolling stock in the –10.4% most efficient way, cutting the flatcar turnover from 13.5 to 12.1 days and boosting their use of capacity from 79% to 86.5%. Empty run ratio and share of non-operational reduction of the flatcar fleet dropped from 22% and 3.0% to 19% and 2.4%, respectively, an absolute minimum turnover for the Company and the industry as a whole. Market pick-up urged us to consider expansion opportunities. Over the year, TransContainer implemented an extensive CAPEX programme by purchasing ~2,500 units of rolling stock and investing RUB 4.9 billion in new flatcars only. This is another record for us. 6 Company profile 01–13 Strategic report 14–31 Market overview 32–45 Business overview 46–105 Corporate governance 106–163 Financial report 164–231 Appendix 232–295 – There is a long-term global trend towards increasing use of information Share of online sales, % technologies in transportation and logistics. Is it relevant for TransContainer and how are you going to harness digital technologies? 100 – We are fully aware that a transportation company neglecting digital and information 75 technologies has no future. This is especially true for TransContainer as the largest network container operator. We serve tens of thousands of clients annually, offering millions of standard 50 transportation and logistics solutions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis.
    [Show full text]
  • BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities
    WITH THE SUPPORT OF: PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) September 2017 PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) PPP FOR CITIES The Specialist Centre on PPPs in Smart and Sustainable Cities (PPP for Cities) is a research, innovation and advisory center that aims to provide public administrations throughout the world with support in the organization, management and development of projects involving collaboration between the public and private sectors in the smart cities arena. It is also a partnership platform between companies and administrations from all over the world where they can further explore the dynamics of public-private partnerships, create guides to good practices and standards and design solutions to the issues facing cities. The center is led by IESE Business School and is part of the United Nations’ International Centre of Excellence on PPPs program. It has the support and sponsorship of Barcelona City Hall and other public administrations and private companies. This document was prepared by the Public-Private-Sector Research Center as a document of interest for the study of public private partnerships rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Research Results Digest 77
    May 2006 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Subject Areas: IA Planning and Administration, VI Public Transit, VII Rail Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm-Smith Research Results Digest 77 International Transit Studies Program Report on the Fall 2005 Mission INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES IN THE PLANNING AND FINANCING OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS This TCRP digest summarizes the mission performed October 20– November 5, 2005, under TCRP Project J-3, “International Transit Studies Program.” This digest includes transportation information on the cities and facilities visited. This digest was prepared by staff of the Eno Transportation Foundation and is based on reports filed by the mission participants. INTERNATIONAL TRANSIT participants to learn from foreign experience STUDIES PROGRAM while expanding their network of domestic and international contacts for addressing The International Transit Studies Prog- public transport problems and issues. ram (ITSP) is part of the Transit Cooperative The program arranges for teams of pub- Research Program (TCRP). ITSP is managed lic transportation professionals to visit ex- by the Eno Transportation Foundation under emplary transit operations in other countries. contract to the National Academies. TCRP Each study mission focuses on a theme that was authorized by the Intermodal Surface encompasses issues of concern in public Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and re- transportation. Cities and transit systems to authorized in 2005 by the Safe, Accountable, be visited are selected on the basis of their Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity ability to demonstrate new ideas or unique Act: A Legacy for Users. It is governed by approaches to handling public transportation a memorandum of agreement signed by the CONTENTS challenges reflected in the study mission’s National Academies, acting through its theme.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Contents
    Annual Report 2013 Contents U3 Key figures at a glance Group management report 40 – 179 U4 Events 2013 41 Stragey and commercial management system The Company 01 – 33 48 Shipping Finance 62 Aviation Finance 01 Mission Statement 82 Offshore Finance 02 About us 96 Land Transport Finance 10 Letter to our shareholders and business partners 110 Important deals 2013 13 The Board of Managing Directors 112 Financial Institutions 14 Report of the Supervisory Board 116 Investment Management 19 The Supervisory Board 124 ITF International Transport Finance Suisse AG 20 Corporate Governance Report 2013 126 Financial position and performance 30 Our employees 142 Remuneration 144 Non-financial performance indicators/sustainability Financial and equity markets 34 – 39 151 Report on material events after the reporting date 152 Report on opportunities and risks 34 Financial markets and DVB’s financial markets activities 176 Report on expected developments for 2014 36 Equity markets and the DVB share 179 Explanatory disclosures under takeover law 39 Financial calendar 2014 179 Report of the Board of Managing Directors on relations with affiliated companies Consolidated financial statements 180 – 240 181 Income statement 181 Appropriation of profits 182 Statement of comprehensive income 183 Statement of financial position 184 Statement of changes in equity 185 Cash flow statement 186 Segment report 187 Notes Audit opinion 241 Further information 242 – 252 242 DVB worldwide 244 Key words 246 Glossary 250 Abbreviations 252 Imprint Symbols Reference to the internet
    [Show full text]
  • Recast of the First Rail Freight Package
    HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 10th Report of Session 2008–09 Recast of the First Rail Freight Package Volume II: Evidence Ordered to be printed 19 May 2009 and published 2 June 2009 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 90–II CONTENTS Oral Evidence Network Rail Written Evidence 1 Oral Evidence, 2 March 2009 6 Supplementary Evidence 11 European Rail Infrastructure Managers (EIM) Written Evidence 12 Oral Evidence, 2 March 2009 15 Rail Freight Group Written Evidence 21 Oral Evidence, 9 March 2009 25 NewRail Written Evidence 34 Oral Evidence, 16 March 2009 38 Supplementary Evidence 46 Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) Written Evidence 53 Oral Evidence, 23 March 2009 56 European Rail Freight Association (ERFA) Written Evidence 60 Oral Evidence, 23 March 2009 69 Freightliner PL Oral Evidence, 23 March 2009 74 Federal Network Agency Written Evidence 78 Oral Evidence, 30 March 2009 80 Regulatory Service for Railway Transport and for Brussels Airport Operations Oral Evidence, 6 April 2009 88 Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER) Written Evidence 96 Oral Evidence, 6 April 2009 99 Arriva Written Evidence 109 Oral Evidence, 6 April 2009 113 Brian Simpson MEP Written Evidence 121 Oral Evidence, 7 April 2009 122 Michael Cramer MEP Oral Evidence, 7 April 2009 131 Department for Transport Written Evidence 137 Oral Evidence, 20 April 2009 141 Supplementary Evidence 149 Written Evidence Cargo Rail Europe 151 Deutsche Bahn AG 151 European Association for
    [Show full text]
  • Vikingtrain.Com
    VIKING TRAIN - CASE STUDY - Disclaimer This document is authorized for use only in eknowit-learning.eu courses, co-funded by the Marco Polo Programme of the European Union. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the permission of eKnowIT consortium. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials write to [email protected] or go to eknowit.eu. VIKING TRAIN 1. INTRODUCTION In the late 90s, Lithuanian government started to develop a strategy with the aim to become a leading logistics centre in Europe. Lithuania is commonly known as a transit country because in its particular location it shares borders with other European Union (EU) members (Poland and Latvia), with a Commonwealth Independent States (CIS) country (Belarus) and even with the Russian Federation (Kaliningrad Oblast). Lithuanian’s territory is traversed by multiple international transport corridors including access to the Baltic Sea through Klaipeda seaport and connections among Western Europe, Scandinavia, Russia and other CIS countries. In this situation, Lithuanian governments have pursued long-term economic growth through a Transport System Development Strategy. This plan states that the country is heavily committed to comply with EU transport policy that aims to facilitate a modal shift of at least 30% of road freight over 300 km to other transport modes by 2030. In order to achieve such ambitious goal it was indicated that advantages of individual models of transport and efficient interoperability would be exploited to the maximum potential. In this sense, the long-term strategy on transport was clearly oriented to a dominant use of railway mode for freight transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • "Report on Competition in Railway Freight Transport in Spain"
    "REPORT ON COMPETITION IN RAILWAY FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN SPAIN" TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. INTRODUCTION 7 II. LEGAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN SPAIN 9 II.1. Regulation of the rail freight sector 9 II.1.1. The gradual liberalisation of the sector in the EU 9 II.1.2. National rules 15 II.2. Economic characteristics of rail freight transport in Spain 31 II.2.1. Rail infrastructure 35 II.2.2. Rail freight transport 50 II.2.3. Access to rolling stock 60 II.2.4. Repair and maintenance of rolling stock 69 II.2.5. Additional, complementary and ancillary services 74 III. INDICATORS OF COMPETITIVENESS IN THE RAIL FREIGHT MARKET IN SPAIN 79 III.1. The Spanish rail network has a different rail structure from other European countries and less intensive use of the rail infrastructure 79 III.2. Rail represents a small proportion of the total in Spain, and in the last decade that proportion has declined more than in other countries 81 III.3. Spain is one of the countries where new companies have least penetrated the rail freight transport market in relative terms 84 III.4. According to various indicators, the Spanish rail incumbent is relatively inefficient 85 IV. FACTORS LIMITING THE LEVEL OF COMPETITION IN THE SPANISH RAIL SECTOR 95 IV.1. Factors relating to infrastructure 95 IV.1.1. International isolation 95 IV.1.2. Slow freight movement on the rail infrastructure 96 IV.1.3. Smaller average size of trains than in the main competitor countries 96 IV.1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro-Asian Transport Linkages Development
    Informal document No. 1 Distr.: General 20 January 2017 English only Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics Group of Experts on Euro-Asian Transport Links Fifteenth session Yerevan, 31 January and 1 February 2017 Item 2 of the provisional agenda Identification of cargo flows on the Euro-Asian transport links Draft report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links project Prepared by the "Scientific and Research Institute of Motor Transport" (NIIAT) Introduction 1. This document contains the draft final report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links (EATL) project. It presents the results of the project’s phase III whose aim was to identify measures to make the overland EATL operational. 2. In particular, the report offers an overview and analysis of the existing situation in transport and trade along EATL routes, it reviews existing studies, programmes and initiatives on the development of EATL in the period 2013-2016, it identifies main transportation and trade obstacles in transport, trade, border-crossing, customs and transit along the EATL routes, and it formulates recommendations to overcome the identified obstacles as well as to further develop the trade across the EATL area. 3. This document is submitted to the fifteenth session of the Group of Experts on EATL for discussion and review. Informal document No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EURO-ASIAN TRADE ROUTES AND FREIGHT FLOWS I.1. Economics and trade current situation in EATL Region I.1.1. General overview: world trade and economics I.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe
    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3. Freight Traffic
    ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) 1956-2021 Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2020 Members of OSJD As of 1 August 2021 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDz - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova”
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation for Co-Operation Between Railways (Osjd)
    ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2019 Members of OSJD As of 30 September 2019 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDZ - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova” Mongolia
    [Show full text]
  • Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries
    In 2007 the analytical materials of INFOLine information agency were worthily appraised by the leading European companies. In 2007 the analytical materials of INFOLine information agency were worthily appraised by the leading European companies. According to the regulations of the association, all materials of INFOLine agency are certified according to Eurostandards; this insures the quality of materials received by our customers and availability of aftersale services through additional consulting on customers’ request. Branch Research Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries Results of 2011 and Prognosis till 2015 . Main performance figures of railway engineering development in Russia during 2002-2011 . Business description of traction stock manufacturing companies in Russia and 1520 space countries . Dynamics of diesel-electric and electric locomotives production in Russia and other countries of 1520 space . Description of conditions of locomotives fleets of 1520 space railway administrations as well as transport companies of Russia . Dynamics and prognosis of market volume for traction stock in Russia and other countries of 1520 space . Technical specifications of the main traction stock models Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries Results of 2011 and Prognosis till 2015 Contents About Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries research........................................................................4 Section I. Description of the traction stock and railway engineering market ...................................................................9
    [Show full text]