<<

M.E./CFS: a guide for pharmacy teams

Supporting patients living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome 2 Contents

Introduction 4

What is M.E.? 5

Non-pharmacological management 7

Pharmacological management 7

Issues with polypharmacy 8

Delivering pharmacy services 8

Promotion of healthy lifestyles to people with M.E. 10

Quick reference tables Pathophysiology 11 Symptoms and management 12 Common issues 15

Case studies 16

Acknowledgements 17

References 18 3 Essential M.E. facts

M.E. is a complex, fluctuating, long-term Function levels for people with M.E. can condition affecting 250,000 men, women range from being in work (this requires and children in the UK. A GP surgery careful energy management) to not with 10,000 patients will have around 40 being able to wash or feed themselves people with M.E. – see p 5. – see p 5.

The key symptom of M.E. is post- exertional malaise, triggered by physical/ M.E. fluctuates in symptoms and mental activity, so patients must carefully severity, so people who seem well one manage rest and physical/mental day can be very unwell the next – activity. General exercise programmes see p 5. have no evidence-base in M.E. and can cause harm – see p 7.

M.E. is not easily recognisable from Issues associated with multi-morbidity prescriptions alone as there’s no specific and polypharmacy are common in treatment for the condition – see p 8. patients living with M.E. – see p 8.

People with M.E. have difficulty People with M.E. often have increased accessing services, and pharmacy teams susceptibility to side effects, and the may be their only contact with health similarity of these and the symptoms of professionals. Support with ordering M.E., can result in misinterpreting them repeat prescriptions, deliveries and other as new symptoms – see p 8. pharmacy services can be invaluable – see p 8.

Cognitive difficulties in M.E. can affect You can refer anyone affected by M.E., concentration and the ability to retain including carers, to Action for M.E. for information, so offering a written information and support on all aspects of summary, as per the Accessible living with the condition, including Information Standard, is recommended, applying for welfare benefits and particularly for patients with severe M.E. accessing peer-support. Call 0117 927 – see p 8. 9551 or visit www.actionforme.org.uk 4 Introduction

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.) is a relatively common long-term condition with complex symptoms. It causes significant and, in some cases, profound disability. Within the NHS, a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or CFS/M.E. is often given. We will refer to it as M.E. throughout this resource. A lack of understanding and awareness about M.E. as a debilitating, physical, hidden illness means that patients can experience disbelief, and even discrimination, from friends, family, health and social care professionals and employers. Consequently, their health needs may be going unmet. Action for M.E. has produced this booklet for community pharmacy teams in the UK to ensure that people with M.E. receive evidence-based pharmaceutical care and that their needs are met when using pharmacy services. We also offer information to people affected M.E. about the pharmacy services that might help them to manage their long- term condition. We are hugely grateful to pharmacist and Action for M.E. volunteer, Emily Beardall, who wrote this resource and continues to devote considerable time, energy and expertise to engaging with health professionals and improving outcomes for people with M.E. Pharmacy professionals will be familiar with the guidelines for managing many of the symptoms of M.E. from other patients. For this reason, we have focused on special considerations when applying your existing expertise to patients with M.E., non-pharmacological management, and the ways M.E. could affect delivery of pharmacy services for people with the illness. Our case studies (see p 16), based on real patients, show typical medication used and demonstrate polypharmacy seen in people with M.E. We hope you find this resource useful, and would welcome your feedback: you’ll find our contact details on the back. 5 What is M.E.?

Although the aetiology of M.E. is unknown, emerging evidence about the cause of M.E. includes autoimmune deficiencies, viral infections, autonomic nervous system dysfunction and genetic factors, among others. Evidence suggests a population prevalence of at least 0.2–0.4% which means that a general practice with 10,000 patients is likely to have up to 40 patients with M.E.1 They might be difficult to identify from their prescriptions because there is no specific treatment that is licensed for M.E. At present, there is only symptom management available, so you might see chronic pain, , , , or depression treatments, among others, on prescriptions. M.E. patients often have multimorbidity2 so even if they are not taking prescribed medication for their M.E. symptoms, you may still come across them. It is important to know how M.E. may affect the safe and effective use of and the services you provide. As a long-term, fluctuating condition, M.E. is categorised as a disability by the Equality Act 2010.3

Symptoms There are many symptoms of M.E. affecting many body systems, listed in the Symptoms and management quick reference table on p 12. Not all patients will experience all of these symptoms all of the time. Any new symptoms should always be checked, even if they may seem related to M.E. (see Red flags for referral on p 6.) For recent research findings relating to the multi-system nature of the illness and its symptoms, please see the Pathophysiology quick reference table on p 11. Symptoms can fluctuate and women with M.E. often find that symptoms worsen at different times in their menstrual cycle. If a patient appears better or worse at a given moment, this does not indicate a change in their overall condition. The characteristic symptom of M.E. which differentiates the illness from fatigue experienced in other conditions is post-exertional malaise, sometimes referred to as “payback.”4 This is defined as the body’s inability to recover after expending even small amounts of energy on simple physical or mental activity.1 The onset of post-exertional malaise is delayed for at least 24 hours, with slow recovery over several days. Some patients also experience widespread muscle and , along with worsening of their other symptoms, as part of post-exertional malaise. The fatigue experienced by people with M.E. is very different from ordinary tiredness or sleepiness. Simple physical and mental activities can leave patients struggling to function, and pushing through this can trigger post-exertional malaise. For this reason, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence’s guideline for M.E. (NICE CG53, see p 6) stresses that M.E. patients need to space out their activities and may find that their capacity is typically greater at a specific time of day.

Severity and function levels NICE CG53 describes three levels of severity of M.E.:1 • People with mild M.E. are mobile, can care for themselves and can do light domestic tasks but with difficulty. Most are still working or in education, but to do this they have probably stopped all leisure and social pursuits. • People with moderate M.E. have reduced mobility and are restricted in all activities of daily living, although they may have peaks and troughs in their level of symptoms and ability to do activities some of the time. • People with severe M.E. are unable to do any activity for themselves, or can only carry out minimal daily tasks (such as face washing, cleaning teeth). They have severe cognitive difficulties and depend on a wheelchair for mobility. Complications can develop in severe M.E. as a result of being mostly bedbound, such as postural , deep venous thrombosis, osteoporosis, pressure sores and deconditioning.1 6

Diagnosis There is no specific single test to diagnose M.E., though potential biomarkers are being investigated. Diagnosis is currently made after other possible causes for symptoms have been excluded via blood tests specified by NICE CG53.1 This should be a positive clinical diagnosis based on well-characterised set of symptoms. These are post-exertional fatigue or malaise, cognitive difficulties, sleep disturbance and chronic pain, which have persisted for four months in an adult and three months in a child. Early diagnosis and management may aid recovery and prevent further worsening to severe M.E.,5 so if you suspect from their symptoms that someone might have undiagnosed M.E., please refer them to their GP.

Red flags for referral Symptoms that can be caused by other serious conditions should not be attributed to an existing M.E. diagnosis as they may be part of an alternative diagnosis or comorbidity which should be investigated and treated. NICE CG531 lists the following red flags for referral: • any new symptoms, including pain that is new or localised to a specific area • sudden, unexplained weight loss – people with M.E. may have explained weight loss due to difficulty eating and this should be managed • spatial disorientation • localising/focal neurological signs • of inflammatory arthritis or connective tissue disease • signs and symptoms of cardiorespiratory disease • sleep apnoea • clinically significant lymphadenopathy.

UK treatment guidelines • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline CG53 and NICE pathway at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG53 • Scottish good practice statement on M.E./CFS, formally endorsed by RCGP (Scotland) and the Scottish Neurosciences Council at www.scot.nhs.uk/scottish-good-practice-statement-on-me-cfs • Therapy and symptom management in CFS/M.E. published by The British Association for CFS/M.E. (BACME), a professional body for M.E. clinicians and multi-disciplinary teams, at www.bacme.info 7 Non-pharmacological management

The following are used to manage the overall impact of symptoms (see Pharmacological management below for individual management of symptoms), as suggested by Treatment guidelines on p 6. • Rest periods are a core component of all management approaches for M.E.; they can also be part of management of pain, sleep problems and comorbid stress or , especially for those who cannot tolerate medication. • Pacing is a structured approach to managing activity and rest that people with M.E. repeatedly report that they find helpful.6 • Research into the efficacy of individual dietary regimens has been inconclusive,7 so there is no specific dietary advice for people with M.E., though some report finding exclusion diets helpful, in which case a dietician should be referred to for advice on preventing malnutrition.1 • Graded exercise therapy (GET) may be helpful for a specific sub-group of patients, though some patients report adverse effects on symptoms and functioning.1,6 CG53 says GET should be completely avoided in people with severe M.E. and, for those with mild/moderate M.E., only be delivered by appropriately trained professionals. General exercise programmes are not evidence based for M.E. patients and can cause harm.1 • Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is used to support people through long-term conditions, including M.E. Its use does not imply that the cause of the illness is psychological but it can help some cope with the challenges of living with M.E. • There is insufficient evidence regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) to treat M.E. However, some patients report using complementary approaches to help them manage their symptoms,6 so being aware of this is important for checking interactions and reviewing medication. The most frequently self-prescribed approaches in Action for M.E.’s 2014 survey of more than 2,000 people with M.E. were pacing, rest (including bed-rest), vitamin and mineral supplements, and dietary changes.6 Other symptoms are managed as in usual clinical practice, using the standard guidelines for each symptom.

Pharmacological management

There is very little evidence of the safety of pharmacological treatments in people with M.E. for symptoms or comorbid conditions, so the response may be unpredictable and should be monitored, for example with New medicines (see p 9), if applicable. Important medication considerations in people with M.E. are listed in the Common medication issues quick reference table on p 15. There are no treatments for the symptoms of post-exertional malaise, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, or recurrent flu-like symptoms, but the approaches in theNon-pharmacological management section (above) may be helpful. See the Symptoms and management quick reference table on p 12 for specific advice. It is recommended that sleep disturbances are treated if possible, as a priority. Low-dose tricyclics (eg. up to 75mg) and/or anti-epileptics are used for their sedating and pain-relieving effects but guidelines state they should only be initiated after referral to specialist M.E. care, as these are unlicensed indications.1 Tricyclics are not effective as an at this low dose.1 If sleep management strategies do not improve sleep, the possibility of an underlying sleep disorder such as sleep apnoea should be considered (see Red flags for referral on p 6). Any vitamin deficiencies should be treated. For example, vitamin D deficiency, which may contribute to fatigue and pain, is common due to lack of sunlight, and the lack of weight-bearing exercise and possible dietary restrictions due to food intolerances.1 Drug treatment in children and young people with M.E. should be initiated by a paediatrician but may be continued in primary care. Drug treatments sometimes prescribed for children include , amitriptyline, , NSAIDs and analgesia.1 There are a number of drugs in clinical trials for M.E., including the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) cyclophosphamide and rituximab, currently in phase III. Other trials include CNS , low-dose naltrexone, antibacterials, antivirals, and antihypertensives. More information can be found on NHS Choices (www.nhs.uk/ conditions/chronic-fatigue-syndrome), which queries the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; see also the 2016 systematic review in Clinical Therapeutics (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014929181630306X). 8 Issues with polypharmacy

A significant number of people with M.E. take medication for individual symptoms. One patient interviewed had 20 different regular prescription items (see Case studies on p 16) to manage severe M.E. and co-morbid conditions. Organising and taking medication, along with coping with side effects, may add to the burden of living with M.E. Although sometimes appropriate, polypharmacy could occur due to the following factors in someone with M.E. Please also refer to your region’s relevant polypharmacy guidance. • Managing numerous symptoms individually can result in many medicines being prescribed over time. • People with M.E. can attend many different specialists, especially during investigations at the start of the illness to establish a diagnosis, and each may prescribe medication. • Increased susceptibility to side effects (see Common medication issues on p 15), and the similarity of these and the symptoms of M.E., can result in misinterpreting them as new symptoms and medication being prescribed to alleviate them, resulting in a prescribing cascade. • A high occurrence of multimorbidity can contribute to the number of medicines prescribed.2 • Some symptoms may fluctuate over time, so it is possible that the indication for which medication has been prescribed is no longer current.

Delivering pharmacy services

People with M.E. have difficulty accessing health services, and pharmacy teams may be the only contact they have with health professionals. Bear in mind, especially with new patients, that it’s not possible to identify some with M.E. by their prescription alone. Even if they do not take medication for M.E. symptoms, you may come across them taking medication for comorbidities, presenting for over-the-counter (OTC) medicines, or using one of your pharmacy’s services. The following points and Common medication issues quick reference table on p 15 should be considered in the delivery of pharmacy services to people with M.E. We know that policies and procedures for pharmacy services may differ across pharmacy sectors and/or in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. We have used general terms here, while acknowledging that your region may use alternatives.

Ordering repeat prescriptions The cognitive difficulties that come with M.E. can make it difficult to be organised and remember when to re-order medication, so assistance with ordering medication may be helpful, if this service is available. The patient could also be referred to their GP to organise NHS Repeat Dispensing.

Prescription deliveries A number of people with M.E. find prescription deliveries an invaluable service.8 Approximately a quarter of people with M.E. are housebound9 and those with mild or moderate M.E. may look well when they pick up their prescription, but can also have periods of being housebound. Driving can be hazardous and draining for people with M.E., and reaction times may be affected by medication, so they may have difficulty picking up their repeat prescriptions, especially if there is not a carer available.

Accessible information and communication NHS England’s Accessible Information Standard (www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/accessibleinfo) may apply to someone with M.E., depending on individual need. Cognitive difficulties can affect concentration and the ability to retain verbal information, so offering a written list of points covered is recommended, particularly for patients with severe M.E.1 Communication may be impaired by speech, concentration and word-finding difficulties, so people with M.E. may need to take their time and have longer consultations. Use of the consultation room, including for OTC consultations may be helpful, both for seating due to weight-bearing difficulties, and because many people with M.E. have light and sound intolerance so find it more difficult to concentrate in a busy environment. M.E. patients need to space out their activities to avoid exacerbating their symptoms and may find that their functioning is greater at a specific time of day, so consultations could be arranged to fit this. 9

Medicines Use Reviews People with M.E. may benefit from a Medicines Use Review (MUR) in England to discuss any problems with their medication, such as side effects, remembering to take medication, polypharmacy, and other Common medication issues (see quick reference table on p 15).

New medicines With the increased susceptibility to side effects mentioned previously, giving advice on what side effects to expect with any new medication, how to cope with them, and what to do if they cannot be tolerated, will likely improve adherence. Explaining that a low-dose antidepressant has not been prescribed for depression, but rather pain or sleep difficulties, is also likely to improve adherence. Patients would be eligible for the New Service (NMS) in England if the medicine is on the NMS medicines list.

Domiciliary visits Severely affected house- or bedbound patients with M.E. are unlikely to be able to come into the pharmacy for a MUR but might have complex medication problems, such as managing polypharmacy. NICE identified concerns that patients made housebound by severe M.E. received little or no care or support because they are unable to access potentially effective care. The guideline states these patients would benefit from domiciliary healthcare visits,1 so where possible a visit by a domiciliary medicines optimisation pharmacist could be helpful, especially for those with polypharmacy. Action for M.E.’s 2014 survey found that 63% of people with severe M.E. said home visits would make a real difference to their healthcare.6

Common or minor ailments and OTC prescribing People with M.E. often take a range of supplements and herbal medicines, which may cause side-effects or interact with prescribed medication. OTC preparations containing and other substances may not be well tolerated, so patients should be advised to purchase “plain” preparations with a single active ingredient to avoid potential side effects. Red flags for referral on p 6 details the circumstances in which a person with M.E. should be referred to their GP.

Flu vaccinations People with M.E. may be eligible for the free flu vaccination service if they have comorbidities (eg. asthma). Anecdotally, some people with M.E. don’t want to have the vaccine because they are worried it might make them relapse. However, the vaccine has been shown to be both safe and effective in people with M.E.10 Research shows that many more patients who had never been vaccinated against flu reported fears of a relapse than those who had.11 Carers of people with M.E. will be eligible if they are in receipt of Carers Allowance, or if the welfare of the person they care for would be put at risk if the carer becomes ill.12

Supporting carers Family and partners are the most frequent carers of people with severe M.E. and community pharmacy teams can help make life a little easier for them. Advice on giving medicines might be helpful, such as when and how to give them, and what to do if the person they care for has difficulty taking medicines or using devices; it may also be helpful to invite a carer to attend an MUR with the patient. NICE CG53 (see p 6) recommends that people with M.E. should be offered information about local and national self-help groups and support for people with M.E. and their carers.1

Signposting patients and carers Action for M.E.’s Online M.E. Centre (www.actionforme.org.uk) offers information, advice and support on most aspects of living with or caring for someone with M.E., including a searchable directory of local M.E. support groups and specialist healthcare services. The charity also offers printed information resources, specialist welfare benefits advice, and peer-support forums for children and adults affected by M.E. 10 Promotion of healthy lifestyles to people with M.E.

Although people with M.E. inherently live a relatively sedentary lifestyle due to their physical limitations, a study has shown that people with M.E. tend to live healthier lifestyles than the general population, possibly to manage symptoms, and that an unhealthy lifestyle does not influence the severity or duration of M.E.13 There are several factors to be considered when promoting healthy lifestyles to someone with M.E.

Diet The effort required to buy food and prepare nutritious meals can mean that people with M.E. find it difficult to maintain a healthy diet. It can be made more difficult by loss of or intolerance to some foods. If they are experiencing significant problems with their diet or struggling to maintain an adequate food intake, your patient with M.E. could ask their GP for a referral to a dietician.

Exercise NICE CG53 states that advice to undertake unsupervised, or unstructured, vigorous exercise (such as simply “go to the gym” or “exercise more”) should not be given, as it may worsen their symptoms.1 People with M.E. have to pace themselves and stay within a safe baseline of physical, mental and emotional activity to manage their illness, and the patient is the most knowledgeable about their own limits.

Smoking As is a , someone with M.E. who smokes may have inadvertently self- medicated with nicotine to treat cognitive difficulties and symptoms related to the autonomic nervous system, such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Being aware of these issues may help health professionals support people with M.E. to quit and allow the patient to be more prepared so that they can manage any changes in symptoms.

Alcohol Some with M.E. report intolerance to , with consumption exacerbating their symptoms. Research has found that 38% reduce their alcohol intake and around a quarter stop drinking alcohol altogether.14 Tolerance may improve as symptoms improve and it would be advisable for people with M.E. to be aware of the effect of alcohol, considering depression is a common comorbidity. 11 Quick reference tables

Pathophysiology NB. This list is not exhaustive, but includes a selection of recent findings to demonstrate the multi-system nature of the illness and its symptoms.

System affected Pathophysiology

Immunological • Chronic lymphocyte activation, with altered immune response to exercise15 • Reduced cytokine and heat shock protein responses correlating with lengthened and accentuated oxidative stress with incremental exercise16 • Elevated levels of mast cells17 • Autoimmunity, including elevated antibodies to ß-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors18

Neurological • Widespread neuroinflammation19 • Bilateral white matter atrophy and right anterior arcuate fasciculus abnormality20 • Autonomic dysfunction21 and abnormalities in pH handling in peripheral muscle related to autonomic dysfunction22

Cardiovascular • Reduced cardiac volumes and blood volume23 • Down-regulation of renin-aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone systems24

Gastrointestinal • Altered composition of the gut microbiome25

Energy • 20 metabolic pathways showing a hypometabolic dauer state26 • Impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase function27 • Disturbed and lipid metabolism28

Musculoskeletal • Loss of capacity to recover from acidosis on repeat exercise29 • Increased oxidative stress and altered muscle excitability in response to incremental exercise30 • Abnormalities of AMPK activation and glucose uptake in cultured skeletal muscle cells31 12

Symptoms and management This table shows management options for adults recommended by the Treatment guidelines on p 6. Considering the Common medication issues on p 15, it is advisable to try non-pharmacological management from the guidelines before resorting to pharmaceuticals. As symptoms are managed as in usual clinical practice with the standard guidelines for each symptom, these have been listed, along with any deviations and adapted advice recommended by the BACME guide (see p 6). The equivalent NICE guidelines for children for these symptom groups should be referred to.

Symptom group Specific symptoms Pharmacological Non- management pharmacological management

Fatigue Persistent overwhelming None available4 See Non- physical and mental pharmacological exhaustion not improved management with rest on p 7

Post-exertional Flu-like symptoms malaise (eg. general malaise, painful glands with/without swelling, sore throat)

Cognitive Short-term memory problems impairment Reduced attention span (or “ fog”) Inability to multi-task Word-finding difficulties Difficulty planning Loss of concentration

Pain Neuropathic pain CG173: Neuropathic pain in adults (www.nice.org.uk/ Aching muscles or joints guidance/cg173) with the following adaptations (see above) Twitching muscles, cramps to pharmacological treatments: or spasms

Low-dose Tricyclic anti- Anecdotally, some (TCAs) at night, commonly people with M.E. amitriptyline (unlicensed use), initially experiencing pain 10mg or less if not tolerated due to report some benefit daytime drowsiness or antimuscarinic from heated wheat effects, up to 75mg. and bags, heat packs are less sedating if and hot water daytime drowsiness affects function.4 bottles. Antiepileptics for moderate/ severe pain not responding to low-dose TCAs (unlicensed use): gabapentin (initially 100mg at night) or (initially 25mg TDS or simplified to BD)4 or may be helpful in neuropathic pain with comorbid depression (mirtazapine initially 15mg in the evening increasing gradually to 45mg)4 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be helpful for musculo-skeletal pain4 have limited efficacy as tolerance is quickly gained4 and they continued on are known for triggering prescribing next page... cascades32 13

Symptom group Specific symptoms Pharmacological Non-pharmacological management management

Sleep disturbance Low-dose TCAs, commonly Sleep hygiene advice1 Hypersomnia amitriptyline (unlicensed use), Sleep reversal (eg. sleeping initially 10mg or less if not Changes to sleep patterns from 4am to noon) tolerated due to daytime should only be introduced Non-refreshing sleep drowsiness or antimuscarinic gradually so as not to effects, up to 75mg 2-4hrs exacerbate symptoms1 before bed or 12hrs prior to desired waking time4 Avoidance of caffeine4 Sedating antihistamines4 Melatonin may be considered for children,1 or for over 55s for 13 weeks max4

Headache CG150: in over 12s Migraine (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg150)

Neurological/ Dizziness on standing, or Increase fluid intake to Autonomic orthostatic intolerance, or may relieve dizziness or at least 2.5 litres of water nervous system autonomic dysfunction balance problems if intrusive, a day4 Hyper-sensitivity to light or for travel and other and sound likely triggers, for short-term Patients with low blood Poor temperature control use only33 pressure are advised to Excess sweating increase their salt intake to Loss of balance maintain blood volume4 Paraesthesia

Respiratory Recurrent URTIs Antibiotics should only be Breathing difficulties given where there is convincing evidence of an acute bacterial infection4 Breathing difficulties may be due to autonomic dysfunction34 or comorbid asthma and should be treated accordingly

Gastro-intestinal Nausea and pallor CG61: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia Loss of appetite in adults (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg184) Swallowing difficulties or CG61: Irritable bowel syndrome in adults GERD (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg61) Gastroparesis Abdominal pain IBS-like symptoms

Antihistamines may be Eating little and often, helpful for nausea4 but snacking on dry starchy anti-emetic drugs should foods and sipping fluids4 only be considered if severe1 Supplements and thickeners may be advised by a speech and language therapist to aid swallowing medication and to prevent malnutrition in dysphagia35 Some patients with severe continued on M.E. may need to be next page... tube-fed1 14

Symptom group Specific symptoms Pharmacological Non-pharmacological management management

Urinary Increased frequency Antibiotics should only be None available and urgency prescribed when there is Urinary retention evidence of bacterial infection4

Allergies/ Intolerance to certain odours, Standard treatments If patients have a restricted Intolerances foods (eg. dairy or wheat), for allergies4 diet advice should be sought some medication, alcohol from a dietician as there is and other substances a risk of malnutrition1 15

Common medication issues

Issue Comment

Increased susceptibility People with M.E. and specialists anecdotally report non-specific drug intolerance and to side effects with increased susceptibility to side effects. 4 Treatment guidelines (see p 6) recommend all drugs greater severity should be used with caution, at lower doses than usual, and that effects should be monitored closely.

Withdrawal effects Specialists report that patients with M.E. experience significant withdrawal symptoms when ceasing antidepressant treatment.4

Switching Avoid frequent changes of medication because of the above effects, particularly between drugs in the same class.33

Drugs to be avoided The “Do not do” recommendations in CG53 state that monoamine oxidase inhibitors, or used with caution , mineralocorticoids and CNS stimulants should not be used for the treatment of M.E. because of insufficient evidence of their safety and efficacy.1 A high number of patients withdrew from trials of galanthamine, , fludrocortisone and due to adverse effects.1 Anaesthesia involving -releasing anaesthetic agents (such as pentothal) and muscle relaxants (, Tracrium, and Mevacurium) are best avoided if possible. , , and are generally well-tolerated.36 Patients with severe M.E. have difficulty sitting up for any length of time, so this, along with dysphagia, would have an impact on the safe use of drugs such as bisphosphonates.37

Comorbidities Interactions with treatments prescribed for comorbid conditions, for example using low-dose TCAs for pain and sleep disturbance in a patient already taking SSRIs for depression.

Swallowing difficulties/ May affect ability to take solid dosage forms. Thickeners are sometimes advised by dysphagia speech and language therapists to aid taking medicines in dysphagia.35 The RPS guidance document Pharmaceutical issues when crushing, opening or splitting oral dosage forms38 provides professional guidance if patients have been instructed to do this or are using this method of overcoming difficulties swallowing solid dosage forms.

Interactions People with M.E. may be taking a range of supplements, herbal medicines or privately prescribed medication which may cause side-effects or interactions.

Polypharmacy See Issues with polypharmacy on p 8.

Problems Cognitive dysfunction affects memory and concentration, and can cause confusion, so tips remembering for organising and remembering to take medication may be helpful. medication

Non-adherence Medication issues such as side effects, dysphagia, previous experiences with medication, and the burden of polypharmacy are potential contributing factors to non-adherence in M.E. patients. Shared decision-making and an open dialogue about treatment preferences, concerns and previous experiences should take place throughout care1 and could avoid non-adherence. 16 Case studies

These case studies use a combination of information from people with M.E. who kindly volunteered their medication histories, with their names changed.

Case study: Mark Mark, 30, lives alone. His M.E. began three years ago with severe symptoms following a viral infection, which very gradually improved to mild. Although Mark has been able to return to part-time work, his spare time mainly consists of resting and his social life is still very restricted. He has difficulty remembering to use his inhalers and take his tablets, and finds his medication an extra difficulty to live with. In addition to those prescribed by his GP, he occasionally uses herbal medicines and medicines he buys from the supermarket. Mark’s M.E. symptoms managed by medication are: • GERD (omeprazole) • widespread pain and sleep difficulties (low-dose amitriptyline) • back pain () • dizziness and nausea (cinnarizine). Mark is also being treated for: • asthma using an inhaled SABA (salbutamol) and LABA/ICS (Seretide), along with a LTRA (montelukast) as add-on therapy • vitamin D deficiency (Calceos), which can be common in patients with M.E. due to lack of sunlight; it is a treatable cause of additional pain and fatigue.1 Mark’s problematic polypharmacy and unintentional adherence may mean Mark would benefit from a MUR, particularly regarding his asthma. Advice on improving adherence to inhaled and oral medication would also be helpful, perhaps suggesting a prompt sheet or other reminder techniques, along with a discussion about potential interactions with herbal, P and GSL medication. Any new treatments for his asthma would qualify Mark for the New Medicines Service in England.

Case study: Elizabeth Elizabeth, 58, has had M.E. for more than 20 years. Living alone, she struggles with daily tasks such as showering and preparing food, and can only leave the house once or twice a week with the aid of a stick or motorised scooter. Elizabeth finds her medication a problem to organise and has difficulty removing tablets from packaging. She takes D-ribose energy supplement, and the herbal remedies “slippery elm” and “digestive ,” which she says help with her side effects. Elizabeth’s M.E. symptoms managed by medication are: • neuropathic pain (low-dose amitriptyline, gabapentin) • muscle and back pain (naproxen, co-codomol and ) • GERD (lansoprazole). Elizabeth is also being treated for: • depression and anxiety () • allergic rhinitis (beclametasone spray) • vitamin D deficiency (Calcichew D3 Forte). Elizabeth may benefit from a MUR to investigate the side effects she says she is treating with herbal medicines, including a discussion around potential interactions between prescribed and herbal medicines. Popping her tablets out for her or providing them in a dosette tray may help, if this is deemed a safe option. There is possibly a prescribing cascade in that she’s taking macrogol for constipation, possibly caused by her pain relief. A clinical review of Elizabeth’s pain medication may help to establish whether the opioid, and therefore the Macrogol, is essential. Elizabeth might also need to have her medication delivered when she is too unwell to pick them up herself. 17

Case study: Sarah Sarah, 36, lives with very severe M.E. and is bedbound and catheterised. District nurses visit her for bed-sore prevention. Sarah is unable to speak and communicates via computer or tablet. She has seen many specialists who have prescribed medication, such as gastroenterologists, respiratory consultants, endocrinologists, a dietician, and a speech and language therapist. Sarah’s M.E. symptoms managed by medication are: • pain (MST, Oramorph, , naproxen) • nausea (, ) • constipation (prucalopride, macrogol) • abdominal cramps (buscopan) • GERD (lansoprazole) • allergies () • () • malnourishment (Prosource, Maxijul, thiamine, vitamin B complex) • swallowing difficulties (Resource thickener). Sarah is also being treated for: • severe asthma (theophylline) • dysmenorrhoea () • growth hormone deficiency (Omnitrope). Sarah may benefit from either a domiciliary MUR or medicines optimisation, to check that all her medication is still helpful and to establish whether there are prescribing cascades adding to her polypharmacy, as it is difficult to tell if the side effects of some of items are being treated as additional symptoms. As Sarah cannot speak, her communication preferences should be used and recorded, as per the NHS England Accessible Information Standard. Sarah needs to have her medication delivered.

Acknowledgements

We are enormously grateful to the following people for their expert input in reviewing this resource: • Action for M.E. medical advisors Dr Gregor Purdie and Prof Julia Newton • Members of Action for M.E.’s Patient and Carer Reference Group • People with M.E. who contributed their medication history for the case studies • Alison Hemsworth, Head of Primary Care Policy (Pharmacy and Dispensing Doctors), Medical Directorate (Central Team), NHS England • Dr Mahendra Patel, Fellow of NICE and Principal Enterprise Fellow in Pharmacy Practice, Reader Level • Stephanie Przepiorka, Branch Pharmacist, Weldricks Pharmacy • Mike Valentine, Health and Lifestyle Pharmacist, Leger ME Group (Doncaster) lead. 18 References

1 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. CFS/ME: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline (CG53) (2007) 2 Carruthers, B. M. et al. Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria. J. Intern. Med. 270, 327–338 (2011) 3 Office for Disability Issues.Equality Act 2010 Guidance (2011) www.gov.uk/government/publications/equality-act-guidance 4 British Association for CFS/ME. Therapy and Symptom Management in CFS/ME (2015) www.bacme.info 5 Pheby, D & , L. Risk factors for severe ME/CFS. Biol. Med. 1, 50–74 (2009) 6 Action for M.E. M.E. Time to deliver (2014) www.actionforme.org.uk 7 Campagnolo, N. et al. Dietary and nutrition interventions for the therapeutic treatment of CFS/ME: a systematic review. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 30, 247–259 (2017) 8 Beardall, E. Please let me know how your pharmacy helps. A Prescription for M.E. (2015) www.aprescriptionforme.wordpress.com 9 Pendergrast, T. et al. Housebound versus nonhousebound patients with ME and CFS. Chronic Illn. 12, 292–307 (2016) 10 Sleigh, K. M. et al. Double-blind, randomized study of the effects of influenza vaccination on the specific antibody response and clinical course of patients with CFS. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 11, 267–73 (2000) 11 Sleigh, K. M., Marra, F. H. & Stiver, H. G. Influenza vaccination: is it appropriate in CFS?Am. J. Respir. Med. 1, 3–9 (2002) 12 Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. Flu Vaccination FAQs www.psnc.org.uk/services-commissioning/advanced-services/flu-vaccination-service/flu-vaccination-faqs 13 Goedendorp, M. M. at al. The lifestyle of patients with CFS and the effect on fatigue and functional impairments. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 22, 226–231 (2009) 14 Woolley, J. et al. Alcohol use in CFS. J. Psychosom. Res. 56, 203–206 (2004) 15 Nijs, J. et al. Altered immune response to exercise in patients with CFS/ME: A systematic literature review. Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 20, 94–116 (2014) 16 Jammes, Y. et al. CFS combines increased exercise-induced oxidative stress and reduced cytokine and Hsp responses. J. Intern. Med. 266, 196–206 (2009) 17 Nguyen, T. et al. Novel characterisation of mast cell phenotypes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS/ME patients. Asian Pacific J. Allergy Immunol. June 30 (2016) 18 Loebel, M. et al. Antibodies to ß adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in patients with CFS. Brain. Behav. Immun. 52, 32–9 (2016) 19 Nakatomi, Y. et al. Neuroinflammation in Patients with CFS/ME: An 11C-(R)-PK11195 PET Study.J. Nucl. Med. 55, 945–950 (2014) 20 Zeineh, M. M. et al. Right Arcuate Fasciculus Abnormality in CFS. Radiology 274, 517–526 (2015) 21 Newton, J. L. et al. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in CFS. QJM 100, 519–26 (2007) 22 Jones, D. E. J. et al. Abnormalities in pH handling by peripheral muscle and potential regulation by the autonomic nervous system in CFS. J. Intern. Med. 267, 394–401 (2010) 23 Newton, J. L. et al. Reduced cardiac volumes in CFS associate with plasma volume but not length of disease: a cohort study. Open Hear. 3, e000381 (2016) 24 Miwa, K. Down-regulation of renin-aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone systems in patients with ME/CFS. J. Cardiol. 69, 684–688 (2016) 25 Giloteaux, L. et al. Reduced diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome in individuals with ME/CFS. Microbiome 4, 30 (2016) 26 Naviaux, R. K. et al. Metabolic features of chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, E5472–E5480 (2016) continued on next page 19

27 Fluge, Ø. et al. Metabolic profiling indicates impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase function in ME/CFS.JCI Insight. 1, 7–36 (2016) 28 Germain, A. et al. Metabolic profiling of a ME/CFS discovery cohort reveals disturbances in fatty acid and lipid metabolism. Mol. BioSyst. 13, 371–379 (2017) 29 Jones, D. E. J. et al. Loss of capacity to recover from acidosis on repeat exercise in CFS: a case-control study. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 42, 186–194 (2012) 30 Jammes, Y. at al. CFS: assessment of increased oxidative stress and altered muscle excitability in response to incremental exercise. J. Intern. Med. 257, 299–310 (2005) 31 Brown, A. E. et al. Abnormalities of AMPK Activation and Glucose Uptake in Cultured Skeletal Muscle Cells from Individuals with CFS. PLoS One 10. e0122982 (2015) 32 Kalisch, L. et al. The prescribing cascade. Aust. Prescr. 34, 162–6 (2011) 33 NHS Scotland. Scottish Good Practice Statement on ME-CFS (2010) www.scot.nhs.uk/scottish-good-practice-statement-on-me-cfs 34 Action for M.E. Managing ME-CFS A guide for GPs in Scotland (2015) www.actionforme.org.uk 35 Barnett, N. & Parmar, P. How to tailor medication formulations for patients with dysphagia. Pharm. J. 297, 7892 (2016) 36 Fisher, M. M. & Rose, M. Anaesthesia for patients with idiopathic environmental intolerance and CFS. Br. J. Anaesth. 101, 486–491 (2008) 37 Joint Formulary Committee. 6.6.2 Bisphosphonates and other drugs affecting bone metabolism: Bisphosphonates. British National Formulary (2017) 38 Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Pharmaceutical Issues when Crushing, Opening or Splitting Oral Dosage Forms (2011) www.rpharms.com/resources/toolkits/specials Action for M.E. takes action to end the ignorance, injustice and neglect experienced by people with M.E. We provide information, support and advice to people affected by M.E. to help improve their health and well-being. We work with professionals to enhance the care and support that people with M.E. receive, and invest in and drive research to advance knowledge of the illness.

42 Temple Street Keynsham BS31 1EH

T 0117 927 9551 E [email protected] www.actionforme.org.uk actionforme @actionforme

Registered charity Registered charity in England and Wales no. 1036419 Registered in Scotland no. SC040452 Company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 2906840 ©Action for M.E. May 2017