DOCSLIB.ORG

How Do You Switch Between Pregabalin and Gabapentin for Neuropathic Pain, and Vice Versa?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Do You Switch Between Pregabalin and Gabapentin for Neuropathic Pain, and Vice Versa? Medicines Q&As Q&A 408.1 How do you switch between pregabalin and gabapentin for neuropathic pain, and vice versa? Prepared by UK Medicines Information (UKMi) pharmacists for NHS healthcare professionals Date prepared: 5th November 2012 Background Both gabapentin and pregabalin were originally developed as antiepileptic drugs. Both agents are also licensed for use in neuropathic pain1,2. The mechanism of action is similar for pregabalin and gabapentin. Both drugs bind to the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels1,2. Gabapentin has nonlinear pharmacokinetics, meaning careful titration of dose is required, whereas pregabalin possesses linear pharmacokinetics, which mean dosing regimes are more straightforward3. Pregabalin is recommended as a first-line treatment option for neuropathic pain by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence4. This recommendation was seen as controversial at the time of publication of the guideline, as gabapentin was in common use prior to this time5. Answer There have been no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions found between pregabalin and gabapentin6, although pregabalin displaces gabapentin from receptors7. The manufacturer of both pregabalin and gabapentin advises that if they are to be discontinued, or the dose reduced or substituted with an alternative medication, the dose should be tapered gradually over a minimum of a week1,2. However, this withdrawal is to minimise the risk of increased seizure frequency where they are being used for patients with seizure disorders8. The clinical importance of a slow withdrawal in patients with neuropathic pain remains unknown. Literature Search There is very limited evidence in the medical literature with regards to managing a switch between the two agents. A conference abstract of a small study included 26 patients who were directly switched from gabapentin to pregabalin. The focus of the study was looking at unlicensed doses of pregabalin and gabapentin for the treatment of pain models outside of the pregabalin license. Patients were switched directly to pregabalin after stopping gabapentin with no dose tapering or wash out period. Most patients were switched to 150mg twice daily of pregabalin (above the recommended licensed starting dose in the UK). Unfortunately, there was no reported information on tolerability of this switching regime9. An open label study substituted gabapentin with pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to peripheral neuropathy. The author describes an overnight switch from gabapentin to pregabalin, based on a conversion table which is described in the paper as “of the author’s creation” (table 1). No serious adverse effects appeared to have been caused by the switch. Patients who had not responded to gabapentin therapy appeared to have a higher likelihood of adverse effects such as sedation and dizziness, although these did not lead to treatment discontinuation after one week10. Daily Dose of Daily dose of pregabalin per day Dosing schedule of pregabalin gabapentin pre-switch post switch (mg/day) (mg/day) 0-900 150 75mg twice daily From the National Electronic Library for Medicines. www.nelm.nhs.uk 1 Medicines Q&As 901-1500 225 75mg in the morning and 150mg in the evening* 1501-2100 300 150mg twice daily 2101-2700 450 150mg in the morning and 300mg in the evening 2700 or higher 600 300mg twice daily Table 1: Dose conversion of gabapentin to pregabalin used in the Toth study. *the table in the published study actually reads 75mg in the morning and 225mg in the evening. This error has been corrected in the above table. Yilmaz et al conducted a cross-over study design in which patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury were randomised into either the pregabalin or gabapentin group. Patients were titrated up to the highest tolerated dose up to 1800mg per day for gabapentin and 300mg per day for pregabalin for a total of 8 weeks. After a washout period of 2 weeks, they were switched to the other medication. Tolerability of this switching regime was not reported.11 A small (n=32) study of patients with post-herpetic neuralgia saw patients switched from gabapentin to pregabalin at one sixth of the gabapentin dose. No serious side effects occurred, and no significant difference was found before and after substitution in the number of patients with somnolence and dizziness. A significant (p<0.05) increase in the number of patients with peripheral oedema was found after the switch12. Manufacturer’s Information Pfizer, the manufacturer of both Lyrica® (pregabalin) and Neurontin® (gabapentin), advise that in the absence of clinical studies, licensed dosage information for both gabapentin and pregabalin should be consulted. They are unable to make any recommendations regarding initiating or switching13. An in-house pharmacokinetic simulation suggests that a regime of halving the original gabapentin dose, and introducing half the intended dose of pregabalin on day 0, then stopping gabapentin and doubling the pregabalin dose on day 4 leads to fairly stable drug levels of pregabalin equivalents. However, the efficacy and safety of this switching regime has not been established, and use in this way would fall out with the licenses of the products13. Summary In the absence of more detailed data, recommendations cannot be made about initiating or switching to gabapentin following pregabalin treatment or vice versa. The individual SPCs suggest that both agents should be discontinued over the course of a week, although whether this is relevant for patients with neuropathic pain remains unclear. Any decisions made will need to be based on a clinical judgement, in partnership with the patient. Pain clinics or individual Primary Care Trusts may have developed local switching guidance which should be consulted where possible. Limitations This Medicines Q&A does not consider the potential for differences in efficacy of pregabalin and gabapentin but merely considers how to manage a switch. Disclaimer • Medicines Q&As are intended for healthcare professionals and reflect UK practice. • Each Q&A relates only to the clinical scenario described. • Q&As are believed to accurately reflect the medical literature at the time of writing. • The authors of Medicines Q&As are not responsible for the content of external websites and links are made available solely to indicate their potential usefulness to users of NeLM. You must use your judgement to determine the accuracy and relevance of the information they contain. From the National Electronic Library for Medicines. www.nelm.nhs.uk 2 Medicines Q&As • This document is intended for use by NHS healthcare professionals and cannot be used for commercial or marketing purposes. • See NeLM for full disclaimer. References Quality Assurance Prepared by Hayley Johnson, Regional Drug & Therapeutics Centre Date Prepared 5th November 2012 Checked by Nancy Kane, Regional Drug & Therapeutics Centre Date of check 29th November 2012 Search strategy Embase PREGABALIN* AND GABAPENTIN* AND NEUROPATHIC PAIN* Medline Pregabalin.af AND gabapentin.af AND NEURALGIA* eMC NICE PRODIGY Micromedex Manufacturer’s medical information department References 1 Summary of Product Characteristics- Neurontin (gabapentin). Pfizer Ltd. Accessed via http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/printfriendlydocument.aspx?documentid=17095 on 05/11/2012. [date of revision of the text 04/2012] 2 Summary of Product Characteristics- Lyrica (pregabalin). Pfizer Ltd. Accessed via http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/14651/SPC/Lyrica+Capsules/ on 05/11/2012. [date of revision of the text 07/2009 3 Dworkin r, O’Connor A, Audette J et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: An overview and literature update. Mayo Clinical Proceedings 2010; 85(3): S3-S14 4 National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE CG96. Neuropathic Pain: the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings. 2010. Accessed via http://publications.nice.org.uk/neuropathic-pain-cg96/guidance on 05/11/2012 5 Why q pregabalin ? DTB 2010;48:61 doi:10.1136/dtb.2010.04.0029. Accessed via http://dtb.bmj.com/content/48/6/61.extract on 05/11/2012 6 Baxter K, Preston C (Eds), Stockley’s Drug Interactions. [online] London: Pharmaceutical Press. Accessed via www.medicinescomplete.com on 05/11/2012. 7 Bazire S. Pregabalin. In: Psychotropic Drug Directory 2009, page 356 8 Gajraj N. Pregabalin: its pharmacology and use in pain management. Anasethesia and alangesia 2007; 105(6) 1805-1815 9 Allen S. Pregabalin- is it any better than gabapentin? Presented at the IASP’s 11th World Congres on Pain: Sydney, Australia 2005, cited in: Personal Communication with Medical Information- Pfizer Ltd 27/11/2012 From the National Electronic Library for Medicines. www.nelm.nhs.uk 3 Medicines Q&As 10 Toth C. Substitution of gabapentin therapy with pregabalin therapy in neuropathic pain due to peripheral neuropathy. Pain Medicine 2010; 11: 456-465 11 Yilmaz B, Yasar E, Koroglu Omac O et al. Gabapentin vs pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a cross over study. European Journal of Pain Supplements. 2011; 5(1): 239 12 Ifuku M, Iseki M, Hidaka I et al. Replacement of gabapentin with pregabalin in postherpetic neuralgia therapy. Pain medicine 2011; 12: 1112-1116. 13 Personal Communication with Medical Information- Pfizer Ltd 27/11/2012 From the National Electronic Library for Medicines. www.nelm.nhs.uk 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neurontin (Gabapentin)
    Texas Prior Authorization Program Clinical Criteria Drug/Drug Class Gabapentin Clinical Criteria Information Included in this Document Neurontin (gabapentin) • Drugs requiring prior authorization: the list of drugs requiring prior authorization for this clinical criteria • Prior authorization criteria logic: a description of how the prior authorization request will be evaluated against the clinical criteria rules • Logic diagram: a visual depiction of the clinical criteria logic • Supporting tables: a collection of information associated with the steps within the criteria (diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and therapy codes); provided when applicable • References: clinical publications and sources relevant to this clinical criteria Note: Click the hyperlink to navigate directly to that section. Gralise (gabapentin Extended Release) • Drugs requiring prior authorization: the list of drugs requiring prior authorization for this clinical criteria • Prior authorization criteria logic: a description of how the prior authorization request will be evaluated against the clinical criteria rules • Logic diagram: a visual depiction of the clinical criteria logic • Supporting tables: a collection of information associated with the steps within the criteria (diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and therapy codes); provided when applicable • References: clinical publications and sources relevant to this clinical criteria Note: Click the hyperlink to navigate directly to that section. March 29, 2019 Copyright © 2019 Health Information Designs, LLC 1 Horizant
    [Show full text]
  • Big Pain Assays Aren't a Big Pain with the Raptor Biphenyl LC Column
    Featured Application: 231 Pain Management and Drugs of Abuse Compounds in under 10 Minutes by LC-MS/MS Big Pain Assays Aren’t a Big Pain with the Raptor Biphenyl LC Column • 231 compounds, 40+ isobars, 10 drug classes, 22 ESI- compounds in 10 minutes with 1 column. • A Raptor SPP LC column with time-tested Restek Biphenyl selectivity is the most versatile, multiclass-capable LC column available. • Achieve excellent separation of critical isobars with no tailing peaks. • Run fast and reliable high-throughput LC-MS/MS analyses with increased sensitivity using simple mobile phases. The use of pain management drugs is steadily increasing. As a result, hospital and reference labs are seeing an increase in patient samples that must be screened for a wide variety of pain management drugs to prevent drug abuse and to ensure patient safety and adherence to their medication regimen. Thera- peutic drug monitoring can be challenging due to the low cutoff levels, potential matrix interferences, and isobaric drug compounds. To address these chal- lenges, many drug testing facilities are turning to liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for its increased speed, sensitivity, and specificity. As shown in the analysis below, Restek’s Raptor Biphenyl column is ideal for developing successful LC-MS/MS pain medication screening methodologies. With its exceptionally high retention and unique selectivity, 231 multiclass drug compounds and metabolites—including over 40 isobars—can be analyzed in just 10 minutes. In addition, separate panels have been optimized on the Raptor Biphenyl column specifically for opioids, antianxiety drugs, barbiturates, NSAIDs and analgesics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, hallucinogens, and stimulants for use during confirmation and quantitative analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Mechanisms of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs
    Chapter 25 Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs GRAEME J. SILLS Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool _________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The serendipitous discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of phenobarbital in 1912 marked the foundation of the modern pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. The subsequent 70 years saw the introduction of phenytoin, ethosuximide, carbamazepine, sodium valproate and a range of benzodiazepines. Collectively, these compounds have come to be regarded as the ‘established’ antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A concerted period of development of drugs for epilepsy throughout the 1980s and 1990s has resulted (to date) in 16 new agents being licensed as add-on treatment for difficult-to-control adult and/or paediatric epilepsy, with some becoming available as monotherapy for newly diagnosed patients. Together, these have become known as the ‘modern’ AEDs. Throughout this period of unprecedented drug development, there have also been considerable advances in our understanding of how antiepileptic agents exert their effects at the cellular level. AEDs are neither preventive nor curative and are employed solely as a means of controlling symptoms (i.e. suppression of seizures). Recurrent seizure activity is the manifestation of an intermittent and excessive hyperexcitability of the nervous system and, while the pharmacological minutiae of currently marketed AEDs remain to be completely unravelled, these agents essentially redress the balance between neuronal excitation and inhibition. Three major classes of mechanism are recognised: modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission; and attenuation of glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission. The principal pharmacological targets of currently available AEDs are highlighted in Table 1 and discussed further below.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyrica Gabapentin: an Easy Switch!
    Pharmacist Contacts: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Lyrica Gabapentin: An Easy Switch! Conversion between Lyrica and gabapentin is generally Daily Dose of Daily Dose of Shingrix well tolerated and direct switching minimizes potential for Gabapentin Lyrica Reactogenicity gaps in pain relief. In the absence of seizure history, the (mg/day) (mg/day) drugs can be directly interchanged; patients can be advised 0 – 300 50 to discontinue Lyrica and begin gabapentin the following When giving Shingrix, day. Patients with a seizure history should be cross-tapered 301 – 450 75 counsel patients about over 1 – 4 weeks. 451 – 600 100 expected reactions. 601 – 900 150 While cross-tolerance is expected, patients should be 901 – 1200 200 advised adverse effects such as drowsiness or edema may There is a 10% chance of 1201 – 1500 250 still emerge when therapy is changed but tend to decrease developing a grade 3 1501 – 1800 300 injection site reaction with time. A conservative approach may be useful to 1801 – 2100 350 and/or systemic mitigate adverse effects. reactions (see table 2101 – 2400 400 Titration of gabapentin to the maximum tolerated 2401 – 2700 450 below) – these symptoms therapeutic dose is important. The therapeutic dosing 2701 – 3000 500 were significant enough range in neuropathic pain trials is 1800-3600 mg/day to prevent regular (normal renal function). The pharmacokinetics of 3001 – 3600 600 activities in about 17% of gabapentin require regular dosing, it will not work if clinical trial patients, but dosed “as needed.” Studies show minimal benefit & tend to pass within 2-3 more adverse effects when high days.
    [Show full text]
  • “GABA” 'Bout? Pregabalin and Gabapentin Abuse
    3/19/18 What’s All the “GABA” ‘Bout? Pregabalin and Gabapentin Abuse Courtney Kominek, PharmD, BCPS, CPE Disclosures .Courtney Kominek, PharmD, BCPS, CPE –Axial Healthcare – Consultant .The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the United States government, including the Department of Veterans Affairs. 1 3/19/18 Learning Objectives .Review the proposed mechanisms of action (MOA) for gabapentin and pregabalin. .Explain the proposed rationale as to why gabapentin and pregabalin have become drugs of abuse. .Identify signs and symptoms of withdrawal that an addicted or tolerant patient may experience upon abrupt discontinuation of gabapentin or pregabalin. .Discuss updates on changes in pain management given the increase in gabapentin and pregabalin abuse. Current Situation Opioid overdose public health crisis Rising use of nonopioid medications including gabapentin Opioids and concomitant gabapentin increase risk for overdose Reports of gabapentinoid abuse Changes in PDMP and scheduling at state level http://www.register-herald.com/news/manchin-asks-fda-dea-to-consider-rescheduling-gabapentin/article_442fa04b-7ed9-5bf8-8d19-b5440e9c278b.html 2 3/19/18 Gabapentin and Pregabalin: Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics Fact or Alternate Fact? .Gabapentin and pregabalin work on GABA. 3 3/19/18 Mechanism of Action Structurally related to GABA and has GABA-mimetic properties Do not • Alter uptake or breakdown • Convert into GABA • Bind to GABAa or GABAB Binds to the α2-δ subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel Reduces the Ca2+ -dependent release of pro-nociceptive neurotransmitters Decreases release of glutamate, NE, and substance P Dworkin RH et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Adverse Effects of Analgesic Strategies For
    Comparing Adverse Effects daily and weekly time during which higher than that of the only ATC opi- their pain interfered with their mood oids group and 17 times higher than of Analgesic Strategies for or activities, and they indicated the that of the only PRN opioids group. Chronic Cancer Pain amount of relief they received from Source: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;33(1):67–77. their pain medicine in the previ- Nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, lack ous week. They also completed the of energy, urinary retention—some- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Clopidogrel: Best Results times the adverse effects of the anal- which measures patients’ ability to per- Pre- or Post-PCI? gesic medication are enough to derail form activities of daily living and their pain management for patients with need for caregiver assistance. When is the best time to give the anti- cancer. It would help to understand There were no significant differ- platelet clopidogrel to patients sched- the relationships between the type of ences between any of the four groups uled for diagnostic coronary angiogra- analgesic prescription and the preva- in terms of pain intensity or amount of phy—before ad hoc coronary stenting lence and severity of adverse effects. time spent in pain. Total pain interfer- or immediately after? Researchers from But not much information is available, ence scores, however, were significantly University of Debrecen, Debrecen, say researchers from the University higher in the ATC plus PRN opioids Hungary and Medical University of of California, San Francisco; the Uni- group than in the no opioids group. Vienna and Wilhelminenhospital, both versity of Nebraska, Omaha; and the The ATC plus PRN opioids group in Vienna, Austria say starting treat- University of Texas Southwestern Med- also had significantly lower functional ment before percutaneous coronary ical Center, Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Stabilizer Medications in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: a Comprehensive Review
    Current Pain and Headache Reports (2019) 23: 37 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0774-0 OTHER PAIN (A KAYE AND N VADIVELU, SECTION EDITORS) Membrane Stabilizer Medications in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: a Comprehensive Review Omar Viswanath1,2,3 & Ivan Urits4 & Mark R. Jones4 & Jacqueline M. Peck5 & Justin Kochanski6 & Morgan Hasegawa6 & Best Anyama7 & Alan D. Kaye7 Published online: 1 May 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review Neuropathic pain is often debilitating, severely limiting the daily lives of patients who are affected. Typically, neuropathic pain is difficult to manage and, as a result, leads to progression into a chronic condition that is, in many instances, refractory to medical management. Recent Findings Gabapentinoids, belonging to the calcium channel blocking class of drugs, have shown good efficacy in the management of chronic pain and are thus commonly utilized as first-line therapy. Various sodium channel blocking drugs, belonging to the categories of anticonvulsants and local anesthetics, have demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy in the in the treatment of neurogenic pain. Summary Though there is limited medical literature as to efficacy of any one drug, individualized multimodal therapy can provide significant analgesia to patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Keywords Neuropathic pain . Chronic pain . Ion Channel blockers . Anticonvulsants . Membrane stabilizers Introduction Neuropathic pain, which is a result of nervous system injury or lives of patients who are affected. Frequently, it is difficult to dysfunction, is often debilitating, severely limiting the daily manage and as a result leads to the progression of a chronic condition that is, in many instances, refractory to medical This article is part of the Topical Collection on Other Pain management.
    [Show full text]
  • Pregabalin for the Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms: a Comprehensive Review
    CNS Drugs (2016) 30:1191–1200 DOI 10.1007/s40263-016-0390-z REVIEW ARTICLE Pregabalin for the Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms: A Comprehensive Review 1 2,3 4 5 Rainer Freynhagen • Miroslav Backonja • Stephan Schug • Gavin Lyndon • 6 6 6 Bruce Parsons • Stephen Watt • Regina Behar Published online: 16 November 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Treatments for physical dependence and asso- treatment of physical dependence and accompanying ciated withdrawal symptoms following the abrupt discon- withdrawal symptoms associated with opioids, benzodi- tinuation of prescription drugs (such as opioids and azepines, nicotine, cannabinoids, and alcohol, although benzodiazepines), nicotine, alcohol, and cannabinoids are data from randomized controlled studies are sparse. How- available, but there is still a need for new and more ever, the current evidence is promising and provides a effective therapies. This review examines evidence sup- platform for future studies, including appropriate random- porting the potential use of pregabalin, an a2d voltage- ized, placebo- and/or comparator-controlled studies, to gated calcium channel subunit ligand, for the treatment of further explore the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for the physical dependence and associated withdrawal symptoms. treatment of withdrawal symptoms. Given the potential for A literature search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library pregabalin misuse or abuse, particularly in individuals with databases up to and including 11 December 2015 was a previous history of substance abuse, clinicians should conducted. The search term used was ‘(dependence OR exercise caution when using pregabalin in this patient withdrawal) AND pregabalin’.
    [Show full text]
  • Insomnia Disorder a VA Clinician’S Guide to Managing Insomnia Disorder (2019) Contents Insomnia Disorder
    Insomnia Disorder A VA Clinician’s Guide to Managing Insomnia Disorder (2019) Contents Insomnia Disorder .................................................................................................... 3 Risks in elderly patients and patients with dementia .................................15 Background ................................................................................................................ 3 Provider perceptions vs reality ............................................................................16 Figure 1. Stepped Care for Management of Insomnia Disorder .............. 3 Figure 5. Weighing the potential risks versus benefits of Table 1. Brief summary of the ISI ......................................................................... 4 medication use .........................................................................................................16 Figure 2. Acute Insomnia to Insomnia Disorder ............................................ 5 Doxepin ........................................................................................................................17 Clinical Pearl ............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 6. Doxepin Use .............................................................................................18 Figure 3. Common causes of sleep disturbance ........................................... 6 Ramelteon ...................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gabapentinoids in Total Joint Arthroplasty: the Clinical Practice
    1 Gabapentinoids in Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, and Knee Society Charles P. Hannon MD1, Yale A. Fillingham MD2, James A. Browne MD3, Emil H Schemitsch MD FRCS(C)4, AAHKS Anesthesia & Analgesia Clinical Practice Guideline Workgroup5, Asokumar Buvanendran MD6, William G. Hamilton MD7*, Craig J. Della Valle MD1* 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada 5Workgroup Comprised of the following individuals: Justin T. Deen MD (Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA), Greg A. Erens MD (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA), Jess H. Lonner MD (Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Aidin E. Pour MD (Department of orthopaedic surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Robert S. Sterling MD (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA) 6Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA 7Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA *Denotes co-senior authors 2 Introduction The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS), The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), The Hip Society, The Knee Society and The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) have worked together to develop evidence-based guidelines on the use of gabapentinoids in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
    [Show full text]
  • Intranasal Pregabalin Administration: a Review of the Literature and the Worldwide Spontaneous Reporting System of Adverse Drug Reactions
    brain sciences Perspective Intranasal Pregabalin Administration: A Review of the Literature and the Worldwide Spontaneous Reporting System of Adverse Drug Reactions Mohamed Elsayed *, René Zeiss, Maximilian Gahr, Bernhard J. Connemann and Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany; [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (B.J.C.); [email protected] (C.S.-L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)-731-500-61411; Fax: +49-(0)-731-500-61412 Received: 2 October 2019; Accepted: 11 November 2019; Published: 13 November 2019 Abstract: Background: It is repeatedly reported that pregabalin (PRG) and gabapentin feature a potential for abuse/misuse, predominantly in patients with former or active substance use disorder. The most common route of use is oral, though reports of sublingual, intravenous, rectal, and smoking administration also exist. A narrative review was performed to provide an overview of current knowledge about nasal PRG use. Methods: A narrative review of the currently available literature of nasal PRG use was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The abstracts and articles identified were reviewed and examined for relevance. Secondly, a request regarding reports of cases of nasal PRG administration was performed in the worldwide spontaneous reporting system of adverse drug reactions of the European Medicines Agency (EMA, EudraVigilance database). Results: The literature search resulted in two reported cases of nasal PRG use. In the analysis of the EMA-database, 13 reported cases of nasal PRG use (11 male (two not specified), mean age of users = 34.2 years (four not specified)) were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabapentin Enacarbil (Horizant) Monograph
    Gabapentin enacarbil (Horizant) Monograph ® Gabapentin Enacarbil (Horizant ) National Drug Monograph March 2012 VA Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Medical Advisory Panel, and VISN Pharmacist Executives The purpose of VA PBM Services drug monographs is to provide a comprehensive drug review for making formulary decisions. These documents will be updated when new clinical data warrant additional formulary discussion. Documents will be placed in the Archive section when the information is deemed to be no longer current. Executive Summary: Gabapentin enacarbil (Horizant®) is a prodrug of gabapentin which binds with high affinity to the α2δ subunit of voltage-activated calcium channels in vitro studies. It is unknown how the binding of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) to the α2δ subunit corresponds to the treatment of restless leg syndrome (RLS) symptoms. Indication: GEn is FDA approved for treatment of RLS. Pharmacokinetics: GEn is primarily excreted by the kidneys and neither gabapentin nor GEn is substrate, inhibitor, or inducer of the major CYP450 system. In addition, GEn is not an inhibitor or substrate of p-glycoprotein in vitro. Dose: The recommended dosage is 600 mg once daily taken with food at about 5 PM. Efficacy: Several studies examining GEn have shown efficacy over placebo in patients with RLS; improvement in RLS symptoms was observed within 7 days of starting treatment.6-8, 12-14 Three studies demonstrated 1200 mg/day GEn significantly reduced International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) scale total score and improved Clinical Global Impression– Improvement (CGI-I) scale compared with placebo.6-8 Two studies demonstrated efficacy at lower dose of 600 mg/day GEn; however, another study did not.7,12,13 These results are comparable to those seen with dopamine agonists.8,12 Adverse Drug Events: Commonly reported adverse effects for the approved dose of 600 mg/day GEn are somnolence, sedation and dizziness.
    [Show full text]