DOCSLIB.ORG

The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven an Operational History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 21 January 2014 The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven An Operational History by Gary M. Gibson The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven An Operational History .................................................................. 1 Origin ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Arming and Fitting .................................................................................................................................... 5 Manning .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Operational History 1813 .......................................................................................................................... 8 Operational History 1814 ........................................................................................................................ 11 Post-War ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Commanding Officers ............................................................................................................................. 13 Reference Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... 13 The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 21 January 2014 Origin The United States Navy’s Armed Merchant Schooner Raven began life as the British merchant schooner Mary Hatt. When and where she was built is not known, but she was in service by the spring of 1810.1 The Mary Hatt was probably named after the mother of the brothers Richard and Samuel Hatt, or of Richard’s wife, or both. The Hatt brothers owned a farm, a store, a mill, a distillery and a potash works in Canada near the head of Lake Ontario. In 1803, they sent as many as 1,500 barrels of flour across the lake and down the St. Lawrence River to Quebec.2 Before the war, the Mary Hatt operated much as a tramp steamer would in a later century, going from place to place around Lake Ontario, wherever there was a cargo to be found. As she was a British-owned vessel, most voyages were probably between Kingston, York and Niagara. This was known, at the time, as the forwarding trade. As United States law at the time prohibited trade with Canada, the Mary Hatt’s visits to American lake ports would be few and likely unrecorded. Canadian lighthouse duty records refer to the Mary Hatt as just the Mary. There was another, smaller, Mary (35 or 36 tons as opposed to the Mary Hatt’s 51 ton entries) that complicates the situation. What is known about the Mary Hatt’s pre-war activity is shown in the following table.3 Date Arrived At Master Notes April to June 1810 Kingston Benjamin Monger Three arrivals July to September 1810 Kingston Benjamin Monger Three arrivals 20 July 1810 Niagara 17 August 1810 Niagara 20 September 1810 Niagara April to June 1811 Kingston George Miller One arrival July to September 1811 Kingston George Miller Two arrivals 9 July 1811 Queenston 25 August 1811 Queenston July to September 1812 Kingston George Miller Crew size was small, usually only a master, a mate and four or five hands. Just enough men to be able to safely navigate the schooner in all weather conditions. In the fall of 1812, her master was George Miller.4 The Mary Hatt was about average size for a Lake Ontario merchant schooner. According to the United States Navy, she could carry about 50 tons of cargo.5 This was a “tons burthen” measurement, an artificial calculation based on the beam and keel length of a merchant ship and not a measurement of the weight of the water displaced by the vessel as was common in the latter part of the nineteenth century.6 Dimensional 1 According to British lighthouse records, the Mary Hatt arrived at Kingston (recorded as just Mary) three times in the second quarter of 1810, each time with Benjamin Monger as master. The author thanks Walter Lewis for this information. 2 White, Patrick, Lord Selkirk’s Diary, pp.300-301. The Hatt family’s operations were quite extensive, the mill alone costing about £7,500 and they had “all the latest improvements of mechanism;” also the entry for Hatt, Richard, in Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online (www.biographi.ca). 3 The author is indebted to Walter Lewis for this information. 4 Isaac Chauncey to John D. Vincent, 16 November 1812, CLB 3. 5 A Return of Vessels of War belonging to the United States upon Lake Ontario exhibiting their force in Guns and Men, 10 June 1813, AF, roll 76 frames 201-203. 6 Now often referred to as “Builder’s Old Measurement” or BOM, the calculation multiplied the keel length “for tonnage” by the square of the vessel’s beam (both in feet) and the product divided by 190 (188 in British service). This calculation was also used Page 2 The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven – An Operational History The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 21 January 2014 information, with length, keel and beam based on other merchant schooners of similar tonnage, is shown in Table 1 Length on deck about 56 feet Beam about 18 feet Probable Tonnage 50 tons Table 1 – Estimated Dimensional Information for the Raven It is not known whether the Mary Hatt was a topsail schooner (square top and sometimes topgallant sails on the fore and often the main masts) or if she had a “pure” schooner rig. The latter allowed for a smaller crew size as all sails could be worked from the deck. Most of the schooners purchased by the navy in 1812 that did not have square topsails (e.g. Collector) had them added when they were converted to armed merchant schooners. it is not known if this was done for the Mary Hatt or if she was so-rigged when she was purchased. Shortly after the outbreak of war in June 1812, the naval officer commanding on Lake Ontario, Lieutenant Melancthon Taylor Woolsey, informed Secretary of the Navy Paul Hamilton that he had received word that the British government had taken over the Mary Hatt and had armed her with four small cannon.7 There is no evidence that supports this claim, and it is doubtful the Mary Hatt had any armament on board while she was in merchant service. If she was ever armed, all guns had been removed by November 1812.8 On Saturday, 7 November 1812, Commodore Isaac Chauncey’s flagship, the 18-gun brig Oneida, and six armed merchant schooners sailed from Sackets Harbor. Chauncey’s object was to intercept the British Provincial Marine warships which, he understood, “have gone up the lake with troops to reinforce Fort George.”9 at the time for warships, although such vessels carried no cargo. For warships, it was of value only as a means to compare their relative sizes. 7 Melancthon T. Woolsey to Paul Hamilton, 10 July 1812, NAUS, RG 45, SNLRO, 1813 vol 3 item 16, roll 12. 8 The Mary Hatt was unarmed when she was captured by the Americans in November 1812. 9 Isaac Chauncey to Paul Hamilton, 6 November 1812, SNLRC, 1812 vol 3 item 167 roll 25; Isaac Chauncey to Daniel D. Tompkins, 7 November 1812, CLB 3. The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven – An Operational History Page 3 The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 21 January 2014 Map of Northeastern Lake Ontario On 10 November 1812, the squadron chased the Provincial Marine corvette Royal George into Kingston Harbor and that afternoon fired on the British vessel but without result. That night, while the rest of the squadron anchored off Four Mile Point, intending to resume the attack in the morning, the armed merchant schooners Growler and Julia patrolled the Lower Gap as guard boats. About 11 p.m. a vessel was seen in the moonlight to windward about three kilometers away. As only the whereabouts of the Royal George was known, this could have been the 14-gun Earl of Moira. After clearing for action and firing an alarm gun to warn Chauncey, the Growler approached the strange vessel. She turned out to be the Mary Hatt, which was heading for Kingston, quite unaware of the American squadron’s presence. The Growler came alongside the Mary Hatt and captured the schooner without resistance. Her master, George Miller, and her crew were taken on board and replaced with men from the Growler. About daybreak the wind freshened and it became impossible to make any progress to windward. The Mary Hatt was drifting further and further downwind, back towards Kingston. At this point, Commodore Chauncey ordered the Growler to convoy the Mary Hatt through the Kingston Channel, around the foot of Long Island (now Wolfe Island), then down past Gravelly Point and back into the lake. There, the Mary Hatt would be ordered to make it to Sackets Harbor the best way she could while the Growler sailed west to rejoin the rest of Chauncey’s squadron near the Ducks Islands. After a delay of most of a day near the foot of Long Island caused by atrocious weather, the Growler reentered the lake and, about 8 p.m., sent the Mary Hatt on her way to Sackets Harbor. The Mary Hatt arrived safely and spent the remainder of the year at anchor in Sackets Harbor. Shortly after he returned to Sackets Harbor, Commodore Chauncey wrote his brother-in-law, James Heard, in Page 4 The Armed Merchant Schooner Raven – An Operational History The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 21 January 2014 New York City, and appointed him prize agent.10 Two weeks later, Chauncey asked shipwright Henry Eckford to examine the Mary Hatt and report his opinion of her value.11 On 29 December 1812, the case of the Mary
Recommended publications
  • Hornblower's Ships

    Hornblower's Ships

    Names of Ships from the Hornblower Books. Introduction Hornblower’s biographer, C S Forester, wrote eleven books covering the most active and dramatic episodes of the life of his subject. In addition, he also wrote a Hornblower “Companion” and the so called three “lost” short stories. There were some years and activities in Hornblower’s life that were not written about before the biographer’s death and therefore not recorded. However, the books and stories that were published describe not only what Hornblower did and thought about his life and career but also mentioned in varying levels of detail the people and the ships that he encountered. Hornblower of course served on many ships but also fought with and against them, captured them, sank them or protected them besides just being aware of them. Of all the ships mentioned, a handful of them would have been highly significant for him. The Indefatigable was the ship on which Midshipman and then Acting Lieutenant Hornblower mostly learnt and developed his skills as a seaman and as a fighting man. This learning continued with his experiences on the Renown as a lieutenant. His first commands, apart from prizes taken, were on the Hotspur and the Atropos. Later as a full captain, he took the Lydia round the Horn to the Pacific coast of South America and his first and only captaincy of a ship of the line was on the Sutherland. He first flew his own flag on the Nonsuch and sailed to the Baltic on her. In later years his ships were smaller as befitted the nature of the tasks that fell to him.
  • Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren Mccormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020

    Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren Mccormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020

    Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren McCormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren McCormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020 CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................1 Free Blacks in the Post-Revolutionary American North ........................2 Free Blacks in Boston, Massachusetts ........................................5 Black Participation in the Maritime Trade ....................................7 Life at Sea for Black Sailors in the early United States Navy ....................10 Black Sailors on USS Constitution ..........................................17 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org Introduction At the beginning of the nineteenth century, free black men from the northeastern United States, struggling to make their way in a highly discriminatory American society, went to sea in the merchant marine and the U.S. Navy, including aboard USS Constitution. By no means did shipboard life completely extract them from the prejudices of a white-dominated culture, but it often provided them with better opportunities than they had on land. Like their fellow white sailors, black seamen in the Early Republic could count on stable pay with the benefit of room and board. For many, sea service and its pay provided a path to a better life ashore. Because race was not specifically noted in U.S. Navy personnel records at the time, much remains unknown about these men. However, a survey of the status of life for free blacks on shore sheds light on why some may have found seafaring an attractive opportunity.
  • Newport Villa Owners' Summer Visitors' and Residents' Guide to the Reliable

    Newport Villa Owners' Summer Visitors' and Residents' Guide to the Reliable

    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. (SMITHSONIAN DEPOSIT.) ^'^ Chaj). \ Shelf \{lV\% UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Price^ 1^ Gents [COPYKIGHT, 1883.] DOE, HUNiNEWELL & CO. MANUFACTURERS OF FiRST-CLiss mmm MANTELS, MIRRORS, Drapery Curtains, Lace Curtains, Window Shades, &c. Importers of Upholstery Goods. SPECIAL ATTENTIONS GIVEN TO FURNISHING APARTMENTS THROUGHOUT, INCLUDIXG THE STANDING FINISH, NEWELS, DOORS, DECORATIONS, DRAPERY, CURTAINS, FURNITURE, &c. 577 & 579 Washington St. E. K. HINNEWEO. BOSTO^NT. H. F. BlKCHSTEAn. NEWPORT VILLA OWNERS' ^m\\\tt fmi$n' a«4 "l^t^idjfnte' aXJIDE TO THE RELIABLE BUSINESS INTERESTS OF THE CITY, FOR 1883. Together ivith a List of all the Cottage Rentals, and Villa Owners who will occupy their residences during the Summer of i88j, compiled to date, and other miscellaneous information. PUBLISHED >!V W. G. MORRISON & CO., „ If 3S3 WASHINGTON STREET, BOSTON. Copyright, 1883. NEWPORT VILLA OWNERS PORTABLE A% ELECTRIC LIGHTER PRICE S5.00. A Scientific and Economical Apparatus for Lighting for Home, Business, Office, Mining and Manufacturing Purposes. Complete in Itself. The Electric Current Being Produced by Chemical Action. This apparatus, by our adjustments, for which we make extra charges, can be adapted to use as a Burglar Alarm, Medical Battery, Call Bell, OR FOR AUTOMATIC ELECTRIC GAS LIGHTING. Our Burglar Alarm is so constructed that the intruder is imme- diately confronted with a light and a bell-alarm at the same instant. Reliable agents wanted all over the country. Enclose stamp for circular. Portable Electric Light Company, 22 WATER STREET, BOSTON. Chartered under the laws of Massachusetts, December, 1882. " A Portable Electric Lighterfor $5 is being extensively sold by the Portable Electric Light Co., of i^ Water Street, Boston.
  • Ships Down Through Theyears CNO TESTIFY BEFORE PAY COMMISSION 0Th Stress Uniqueness of Militaryservice

    Ships Down Through Theyears CNO TESTIFY BEFORE PAY COMMISSION 0Th Stress Uniqueness of Militaryservice

    FEBRU RY 1978 NUMBER 733 FeaturesA WINE AND WATER hristening ships down through theyears CNO TESTIFY BEFORE PAY COMMISSION 0th stress uniqueness of militaryservice astering English football at the source urial at sea aboard USS Boulder (LST 1 190) I 22 US$ SHREVEPORT (LPD 12) , ship with a vital mission in today's Navy 27 MIL TARY SEALIFT COMMAND avy men and civilians working together at sea 34 IT'S A SAREX oiling enemy attempts to capture downed pilots 38 IT'S MORE THAN A GAME ommand interest is one key to advancement 42 NE\ 'SEA PAY PROPOSAL LAUNCHED lore dollars for longer service at sea Covers Front: Co lmander Ira H. Coen, Jr., has the conn aboard the nuclear-powered attack sub1 larine USS Hawkbill (SSN 666) off Hawaii. Photo by LT Franklin D. Peele. Back: Mrs. Iolph Briscoe, wife of theGovernor of Texas, christens the nuclear- powered g1 lded missile cruiser USS Texas (CGN 39). See page 4. Photo by PHAN William F. :lynn. Departmc 1ts 2 Curl !nts 37 Information Exchange 24 Beal rigs 48 Mail Buoy Chief of I aval Operations: Admiral James L. Holloway II I Staff: LT Bill Ray Chi! of Information: Rear Admiral David M. Cooney JOC Dan Guzman Dir. Print M Jia Div. (NIRA): Lieutenant John Alexander JO1 Jerry Atchison Editor: John F. Coleman JO1 (SS) Pete Sundberg News Editor: Joanne E. Dumene PH1 Terry Mitchell F Dduction Editor: Lieutenant Jeff Zakem 502 Davida Matthews Layout Editor: E. L. Fast 502 Dan Wheeler Art Editor: Michael Tuffli 503 Francis Bir Research .Editor: Catherine D.
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of

    Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of

    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
  • First Name Last Name Affiliated Organization Vessel City State Tom

    First Name Last Name Affiliated Organization Vessel City State Tom

    First Name Last Name Affiliated Organization Vessel City State Tom Lokocz Adams Maine Design Company, LLC Appleton ME Andrew Adamus Flagship Niagara League, Inc. US BRIG NIAGARA Erie PA Lori A. Aguiar Tall Ships America Newport RI Björn Ahlander Viking Kings DRAKEN HARALD HÅRFAGRE Haugesund LADY WASHINGTON and HAWAIIAN Constance Allen Grays Harbor Historical Seaport CHIEFTAIN Aberdeen WA Nicholas Alley Mystic Seaport BRILLIANT Mystic CT Jay Amster West Haven CT Jennifer Angel Waterfront Development Halifax NS Francois Arbellot BREST 2016 Brest Finistere Richard Bailey Oliver Hazard Perry Rhode Island OLIVER HAZARD PERRY Newport RI SSV CORWITH CRAMER, SSV ROBERT C. David Bank Sea Education Association SEAMANS Woods Hole MA Philadelphia Autism Center for Jayme Banks Excellence Philadelphia PA Linda Beal South Street Seaport PIONEER, LETTIE G. HOWARD Belvidere NJ South Street Seaport Museum, New Anne Beaumont York Harbor Foundation PIONEER, LETTIE G. HOWARD New York NY Pat Beck MYSTIC WHALER Mystic CT Austin Becker University of Rhode Island Kingston RI Michael Bellard NY Harbor School LETTIE G. HOWARD New York NY Joseph Benton III McAllister Towing of Philadelphia Gloucester NJ LADY MARYLAND, SIGSBEE, MILDRED Peter Bolster Living Classrooms Foundation BLLE, MINNIE V Baltimore MD PIONEER, LETTIE G. HOWARD, Jonathan Boulware South Street Seaport Museum WAVERTREE New York NY Bob Boulware The Sound School East Haddam CT Yoko Bowen Kirkwood PA Philadelphia Autism Center for Melissa Brand Excellence Philadelphia PA Robert Brandenstein United States Power Squadron Freedom PA CORWITH CRAMER/ ROBERT C. Peg Brandon Sea Education Association SEAMANS Woods Hole MA Elizabeth Braunstein Tall Ships America Newport RI Jesse Briggs Bayshore Center at Bivalve AJ MEERWALD Newport NJ Gwyn Brown Sail Training International Hampshire Reg Brown SPIRIT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Summerville SC Carlos Canario Discovery World Ltd.
  • Attitudes Towards Privateering During the Era of the Early American Republic

    Attitudes Towards Privateering During the Era of the Early American Republic

    ATTITUDES TOWARDS PRIVATEERING DURING THE ERA OF THE EARLY AMERICAN REPUBLIC A Senior Honors Thesis by James R. Holcomb IV Submitted to the Office of Honors Programs & Academic Scholarships Texas A&M University In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FELLOWS April 2007 Major: History ii ABSTRACT Attitudes towards Privateering during the Era of the Early American Republic (April 2007) James R. Holcomb IV Department of History Texas A&M University Fellows Advisor: Dr. James C. Bradford Department of History Lacking sufficient funds to build and maintain a sizeable navy, the young United States was forced to employ privateers as a “stop-gap navy” in its struggles against stronger sea powers during the War for Independence, the Quasi War, and the War of 1812. Many American leaders opposed privateering on moral grounds, but felt compelled to employ it. Merchants and seamen were generally more supportive, wither because their usual employment, fishing and peaceful commerce, was denied them when enemies hovered outside American ports and began seizing American ships, or because privateering offered the prospect of quick and large profits. Sailors preferred service in iii privateers to enlisting in the navy because discipline tended to be less rigorous in privateers than in warships, privateers appeared safer since their captains generally tried to avoid combat with enemy men of war, and privateers offered the prospect of more prize money from the sale of captured ships. Officers in the Continental and United States Navy usually opposed privateering because privateers competed with them for recruits and for naval stores to fit their ships out for sea.
  • The Naval War of 1812, Volume 3, Chapter 2

    The Naval War of 1812, Volume 3, Chapter 2

    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume III 1814–1815 Chesapeake Bay, Northern Lakes, and Pacific Ocean Part 5 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 2002 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 532 NORTHERN LAKES THEATER JANUARY 1814-JUNE 1815 533 left to guard the vessel and property retreated upon the approach of our Boats- as soon as the vessel was intirely consumed Lieutenant Gregory reem­ as ,:e have nothing to oppose so overwhelming a force and as this class of ves­ barked his Men without having permitted one of them to enter a House.- On sel IS so much beyond any thing which the Government contemplated when I finding the alarm so general he thought it prudent to cross the Lake immedi­ had th~ honor of your instructions in January last, I should not feel myself ately- he stopped one day at Oswego for refreshment and arrived here last authOrIzed even to prepare to build any thing to oppose Such a vessel without evening having performed a most difficult service with his usual gallantry and Special authority.- good conduct Mter I have been a sufficient length of time on the Lake to ascertain Lieutenant Gregory speaks in the highest terms of commendation of Sailing whether th.e. Enemy will fight me without his 84 Gun Ship and there should be Master Vaughan and Mr. Dixon, as well as the Men under his command for no probabIlIty .of a Peac~ ~th England it will
  • Guia ENG WEB.Pdf

    Guia ENG WEB.Pdf

    TITULO SECCIÓN I GS 1 SUMMARY GS3 THE RACE · 3RD EDITION OF THE BARCELONA WORLD RACE THE ADVENTURE BEGINS! 04 THE EDUCATIONAL RACE · EXCITEMENT REACHES THE SCHOOLS! 08 · COOPERATIVE WORK IN THE CLASSROOM 13 HUMAN BEING · THE IMPORTance of a good night’s sleep 16 · THE BALANCED DIET OF THE SAILORS 19 · THE PIONEERS 24 MAIN DOSSIER · LOS PROTAGONISTAS DE LA BARCELONA WORLD RACE 28 SAILING · THE PROTAGONISTS OF THE BARCELONA WORLD RACE 38 · GREEN ENERGY ON BOARD 40 · THE STRATEGY IN A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD 42 PLANET SEA · ANTARCTICA, NATURAL RESERVE FOR PEACE AND SCIENCE 44 · CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SOUTH POLE 49 · AN OCEANOGRAPHER BEHOLDING THE MYSTERIES OF THE SEA 51 PRACTICAL GUIDE · SPORTS WITHOUT LIMITS 54 · THE SEA TEACHES 56 · PROPOSALS RELATED TO THE SEA 58 EDITORIAL Commitment to education and science The latest edition of the Barcelona World Race, organised humanistic and technologic Scientific Research (CSIC). The by the Barcelona Foundation for Ocean Sailing (FNOB), disciplines applied to and act of turning the IMOCA 60s into returns to the city. On this occasion, the event is developed during the Barcelona “scientific vessels” with sensors strengthening its commitment to the world of education, a World Race. that measure aspects such as the commitment most clearly evidenced through the school- Both initiatives serve to salinity, temperature and presence centred programme “Following the Barcelona World Race”. disseminate the scientific of microplastics in seawater Along these lines, in hopes of consolidating the race as a projects conducted by the race consolidates the Barcelona World tool to enhance education and help spread knowledge, in cooperation with specialised Race not only as a leading sporting we created the “Barcelona World Race Ocean Campus”.
  • Naval Documents of the American Revolution, Volume 11, Part 2

    Naval Documents of the American Revolution, Volume 11, Part 2

    Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 11 AMERICAN THEATRE: Jan. 1, 1778–Mar. 31, 1778 EUROPEAN THEATRE: Jan. 1, 1778–Mar. 31, 1778 Part 2 of 5 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 2005 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 1 FEBRUARY 1778 261 Past in the lower House [Hartford]/Feb 1778/ Test: AndwAdams Clerk.- D, Ct, Connecticut Archives, 1st Series, vol. 10, p. 112. February 1 (Sunday) [Boston] 1778 Feb. 1. The Ship1 fell down to Nantasket Road- DLC, Journal of Lieutenant William Jennison, p. 5. 1. Continental Navy frigate Boston, Captain Samuel Tucker, commander CAPTAINANDREW SNAPE HAMOND, R.N., TO VICEADMIRAL VISCOUNT HOWE Roebuck at Philadelphia My Lord, the lSt.February 1'778. The breaking up of the Frost has so much cleared the River of the Ice, that the Liuerpool is enabled to sail for New York for the Generals Dispatches arrived there in the three last Pacquets.-With the Liuerpool goes also a Mail for England in the Despenser Pacquet convoyed by two Armed Vessels.- Since your Lordships departure from hence no material event has happened except the loss of the Transport Brig Symetry one of the Baggage Vessels from New York,' which run a shore near Wilmington, and by the Frost coming on fell into the Enemy's hands before any Assistance could be sent from hence. Out of thirty Vessels that were taking in Forage at Tinnicum Island the 27h, DecemL when the Snow begun,
  • Archaeological Investigations of the Centerboard Schooner

    Archaeological Investigations of the Centerboard Schooner

    WHERE FIRE MEETS WATER: ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CENTERBOARD SCHOONER by Daniel Allen Haddock B.A., The University of West Florida, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The thesis of Daniel Allen Haddock is approved: ____________________________________________ _________________ Amy Mitchell-Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Gregory D. Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people that I wish to thank for their help during this process. To my thesis committee members, Dr. Bratten, Greg, and Amy I am eternally thankful for your support and guidance during both my undergraduate and graduate experience. You have shown me what it means to be both a friend and a professional. To Norine, Allen, and Kad, thank you for your help in conserving and documenting my artifact collection, without your help I would be lost in the lab. A special thanks is needed for the crews of the 2010 and 2011 maritime field schools that helped excavate, map, and document the Centerboard Schooner. My experience with you will always stay with me. I am also thankful for the help from MSC, Steve, Dell, and Fritz for keeping us safe in the field with your training and well-maintained equipment.
  • “Dissolute and Immoral Practices” the Court Martial of James T. Leonard

    “Dissolute and Immoral Practices” the Court Martial of James T. Leonard

    “Dissolute and Immoral Practices” The Court Martial of James T. Leonard Gary M. Gibson Had she been Captain Leonard’s wife her conduct would have been proper.1 n 1812 there were only three sea officer ranks in the United States Navy: lieutenant, master I commandant and captain.2 With Congress repeatedly refusing to create the rank of admiral, a captain had only a promotion to the honorary title of commodore to look forward to. That title was awarded by the Navy Department to a captain commanding a squadron and convention allowed him to fly a special flag called a broad pendant.3 This flag was also used to denote the senior naval officer present on a station. The right to fly a broad pendant was a privilege jealously guarded and disagreements between officers over that right often left a residue of bad feelings. One such occurred on 14 July 1812 when the commandant of the New York Navy Yard, Captain Isaac Chauncey, watched a flotilla of gunboats arrive in New York Harbor with one boat, that of Master Commandant James T. Leonard, flying a broad pendant.4 That annoyed Chauncey. As senior officer, he felt Leonard was out of line and he confronted him about the matter. Leonard told Chauncey that his was a separate command, not subordinate to Chauncey, and therefore he was authorized by the Navy Department to fly a broad pendant. Abbreviations used in the notes: CLB 3 & 4 Isaac Chauncey’s Letterbooks at William L. Clements Library, University of Michigan CLB 5 Isaac Chauncey’s Letterbook at Manuscript Department, New York Historical Society CMT Transcript of the court martial of James T.