DOCSLIB.ORG

Network Statement 2017 Edition 2015-12-10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Network Statement 2017 Edition 2015-12-10 Yta för en liten undertext SWEDISH TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION Network Statement 2017 Edition 2015-12-10 For deliveries from 2016-12-11 to 2017-12-09 Yta för bild Broschyrnamns exempel Denna yta för rubrik vid behov Updates The Network Statement will be updated with the amendments published at the website of The Swedish Transport Administration. Update Implemented Original edition 2015-12-10 Amendment no 1, effect from 2016-02-03 2016-01-13 Table of Contents – Network Statement 2017 1 General Information .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective of the Network Statement ......................................................... 1 1.3 Legal framework ....................................................................................... 1 1.4 Legal status ............................................................................................... 2 1.4.1 General remarks ................................................................................ 2 1.4.2 Liability ............................................................................................. 2 1.4.3 Appeals procedures ........................................................................... 2 1.5 Structure of Network Statement ................................................................ 2 1.6 Validity and updating process ................................................................... 2 1.6.1 Validity period .................................................................................. 2 1.6.2 Updating process ............................................................................... 3 1.7 Publishing ................................................................................................. 3 1.8 Contacts .................................................................................................... 3 1.9 Rail Freight Corridor - Scandinavian-Mediterranean Rail Freight Corridor (ScanMed RFC) ......................................................................... 3 1.9.1 Corridor One-Stop shop .................................................................... 4 1.10 RailNetEurope – international cooperation............................................... 4 1.10.1 National One Stop Shop .................................................................... 4 1.10.2 RNE Tools ........................................................................................ 5 2 Access Conditions ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 6 2.2 General access requirements ..................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Conditions for applying for capacity ................................................ 6 2.2.2 Conditions for access to the railway infrastructure ........................... 6 2.2.3 Licences ............................................................................................ 7 2.2.4 Safety certificate ............................................................................... 8 2.2.5 Cover of liabilities ............................................................................. 8 2.3 General Business/Commercial Conditions ............................................... 9 2.3.1 Framework Agreements .................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Track Access Agreements ............................................................... 10 2.4 Operational rules ..................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Regulations ..................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 Information ..................................................................................... 12 2.4.3 Other rules ....................................................................................... 12 2.5 Exceptional transport .............................................................................. 14 2.6 Dangerous goods ..................................................................................... 14 Network Statement 2017 __________________________________________________________________ 2.7 Rolling stock approval process ............................................................... 15 2.7.1 Communication system GSM-R ..................................................... 15 2.7.2 Operating restrictions ...................................................................... 16 2.7.3 Test run ........................................................................................... 16 2.7.4 Requirement for ETCS equipment .................................................. 16 2.8 Competence requirements for operational personnel .............................. 17 3 Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 18 3.2 Extent of network .................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 National limits ................................................................................. 18 3.2.2 Connected railway networks ........................................................... 18 3.2.3 Further information ......................................................................... 19 3.3 Network description ................................................................................ 20 3.3.1 Geographic identification ................................................................ 20 3.3.2 Capabilities ..................................................................................... 21 3.3.3 Traffic control and communication systems ................................... 24 3.4 Traffic restrictions ................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Specialised infrastructure ................................................................ 26 3.4.2 Environmental restrictions .............................................................. 37 3.4.3 Dangerous goods ............................................................................. 37 3.4.4 Tunnel restrictions .......................................................................... 37 3.4.5 Bridge restrictions ........................................................................... 37 3.5 Availability of the infrastructure ............................................................. 37 3.6 Service facilities ...................................................................................... 40 3.6.1 Passenger stations ........................................................................... 40 3.6.2 Freight terminals and loading areas for freight ............................... 41 3.6.3 Marshalling yards and train formation facilities ............................. 41 3.6.4 Storage sidings ................................................................................ 42 3.6.5 Maintenance facilities ..................................................................... 42 3.6.6 Other technical facilities ................................................................. 42 3.6.7 Maritime and inland port facilities .................................................. 43 3.6.8 Relief facilities ................................................................................ 43 3.6.9 Refuelling facilities ......................................................................... 43 3.6.10 Other facilities ................................................................................. 43 3.7 Infrastructure development ..................................................................... 43 4 Capacity Allocation ........................................................................................ 44 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 44 4.2 Description of process............................................................................. 44 4.2.1 Application for capacity .................................................................. 44 4.2.2 Ad hoc applications ......................................................................... 44 4.2.3 Application for capacity at operational sites ................................... 45 4.3 Schedule for path requests and allocation process .................................. 45 4.3.1 Schedule for working Timetable ..................................................... 46 4.3.2 Schedule for application outside the Timetabling process (ad hoc) 46 4.3.3 Capacity prerequisites ..................................................................... 47 4.4 Allocation process ................................................................................... 49 4.4.1 Coordination process ...................................................................... 50 4.4.2 Dispute resolution process .............................................................. 50 4.4.3 Congested infrastructure - definition, priority criteria and process 51 4.4.4 Impact of framework agreements ................................................... 51 4.4.5 Capacity analysis ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Competitive Tendering of Rail Services EUROPEAN CONFERENCE of MINISTERS of TRANSPORT (ECMT)
    Competitive EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT Tendering of Rail Competitive tendering Services provides a way to introduce Competitive competition to railways whilst preserving an integrated network of services. It has been used for freight Tendering railways in some countries but is particularly attractive for passenger networks when subsidised services make competition of Rail between trains serving the same routes difficult or impossible to organise. Services Governments promote competition in railways to Competitive Tendering reduce costs, not least to the tax payer, and to improve levels of service to customers. Concessions are also designed to bring much needed private capital into the rail industry. The success of competitive tendering in achieving these outcomes depends critically on the way risks are assigned between the government and private train operators. It also depends on the transparency and durability of the regulatory framework established to protect both the public interest and the interests of concession holders, and on the incentives created by franchise agreements. This report examines experience to date from around the world in competitively tendering rail services. It seeks to draw lessons for effective design of concessions and regulation from both of the successful and less successful cases examined. The work RailServices is based on detailed examinations by leading experts of the experience of passenger rail concessions in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. It also
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2010 Contents
    The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2010 Contents A EVERYBODY ARRIVES SMOOTHLY, THE GREEN AND SAFE WAY Contents Contents Comments from the Director-General 4 B 1. The Swedish Transport Administration in brief 6 2. Transport developments 10 Traffic developments on roads and railways 11 Capacity and congestion 11 Traffic and weather 2010 12 3. The Swedish Transport Administration’s operations 2010 14 The Swedish Transport Administration’s efficiency measures 15 Planning for intermodal transports 16 Investments in roads and railways 17 Operation and maintenance of state roads and railways in accordance with the national plan 26 International work 36 Research and innovation 37 4. Transport policy goals 40 Functional objective Accessibility 42 Environment and health 50 Safe traffic 56 5. Employees 60 6. Other feedback 62 7. Financial report 66 Income and expenditure account 68 Balance sheet 69 Appropriation account 70 Statement of source and application of funds 72 Summary of key figures 73 Notes 74 8. Signing of the annual report 80 9. Auditors’ report 81 10. Board of directors 82 11. Management group 83 Comments from the Director-General Comments from the Director-General be solved in the future. When society chairman of the organisation committee changes, then the transport systems must and then elected as Director-General. The also change. This is why the initial focus was to guarantee ongoing Administration’s challenges are closely operations and to maintain contacts with linked to current developments in society. interested parties and the wider world. Climate changes will impact infra- Much effort was spent ensuring function- structure, at the same time as transports ality in the telecom and datacom system, impact the climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Resandeflöden På Sveriges Järnvägsnät Analys Av Utbud Och Efterfrågan På Tågresor BO-LENNART NELLDAL JOSEF ANDERSSON OSKAR FRÖIDH
    Resandeflöden på Sveriges järnvägsnät Analys av utbud och efterfrågan på tågresor BO-LENNART NELLDAL JOSEF ANDERSSON OSKAR FRÖIDH Rapport Stockholm 2018 TRITA-ABE-RPT-1818 Avdelningen för transportplanering, ekonomi och teknik ISBN 978-91-7729-871-7 KTH Arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad www.railwaygroup.kth.se 100 44 Stockholm 2 Resandeflöden på Sveriges järnvägsnät KTH Rapport 2018 3 Resandeflöden på Sveriges järnvägsnät KTH Rapport 2018 Resandeflöden på Sveriges järnvägsnät −Analys av utbud och efterfrågan på tågresor Bo-Lennart Nelldal Josef Andersson Oskar Fröidh Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH) Avdelningen för transportplanering, ekonomi och teknik KTH Järnvägsgruppen Stockholm Rapport 2018-08-31 4 Resandeflöden på Sveriges järnvägsnät KTH Rapport 2018 Innehållsförteckning Förord ..............................................................................................................................6 Sammanfattning ................................................................................................................7 1 Inledning ................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Bakgrund .................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Syfte ........................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Metod .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banverket's Annual Report
    Banverket’s Annual report 2009 The Annual Report Banverket must submit an annual report to the Government not later than 22 February each year, in accordance with the ordinance on annual accounts and budget documentation (2000:605). The accounts must refer to the most recently completed financial year, in this case 2009. Some figures are accompanied by additional figures in brackets. Unless otherwise indicated the figures in brackets are the figures for the previous year. As the annual report includes many monetary amounts, the abbreviations SEK thousand (thousands of Swedish kronor), SEK million (millions of Swedish kronor) and SEK billion (billions of Swedish kronor) are used. Contents Director-General’s comments on the past year 4 Summary of operations during the year 6 Banverket’s operational areas 8 Developing Banverket’s railway network 9 Delivery of train paths 19 Sectoral duties and administration 26 Transport policy goals and results 32 Function goals – an accessible transport system 33 Consideration goal – safety, health and environment 44 Other reports 50 Banverket’s Profit Centres 56 Banverket Production 59 Banverket ICT 60 Banverket Railway Training Centre 61 Banverket Material Services 61 Employees 62 Financial Accounts 67 Income and expenditure account 68 Balance sheet 69 Appropriation account including presentation of authorisation 70 Funds statement 72 Summary of key figures 73 Notes 74 Signing of the Annual Report 80 Auditors’ Report 81 Board of Directors and Management Group 82 The Swedish railway network Brief facts
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2019
    The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2019 Contents Performance Report 3 The Director-General´s Report 4 In Brief 7 Results of the Operations 10 Transport Policy Objectives and Delivery Qualities 10 Operating Areas 24 Planning 26 Operation and Maintenance 30 Investments 41 Specialist Support and Exercise of Public Authority 54 Disbursement of Grants and Other Support 59 Research and Innovation 62 Contract Work 64 Additional Reporting Requirements 66 Competence Provision 72 Internal Governance and Control 76 Financial Report 78 Statement of Financial Performance 79 Balance Sheet 80 Appropriation Account, including Presentation of Authorisations 81 Cash Flow Analysis 85 Summary of Key Figures 86 Notes 87 Signing of the Annual Report 98 Auditor’s Report on the Swedish Transport Administration 2019 99 Board of Directors 102 Management Group 103 About the Annual Report: Unless otherwise stated, figures in parentheses refer to the equivalent figure for the previous financial year. As the annual report includes many monetary amounts, the abbreviations SEK thousand (thousand kronor), MSEK (million kronor) and BSEK (billion kronor) are used. 2 The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2019 Performance Report Page header text PERFORMANCE REPORT The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2019 3 Performance Report The Director-General´s Report The Director-General´s Report A number of positive results achieved during 2019 demonstrate that we are on the right track towards our vision – that everyone should arrive smoothly, the green and safe way – even if there are challenges ahead. The punctuality of railway services has improved, customer satisfaction with traffic information has increased while road fatalities have decreased.
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Railway Deregulation Path
    Review of Network Economics Vol.7, Issue 1 – March 2008 The Swedish Railway Deregulation Path GUNNAR ALEXANDERSSON * Department of Marketing, Distribution & Industry Dynamics, Stockholm School of Economics STAFFAN HULTÉN Department of Marketing, Distribution & Industry Dynamics, Stockholm School of Economics Abstract This paper deals with railway deregulation and related reforms by means of a case study of Sweden, studying the 1988 split of railway infrastructure from operations and the subsequent steps of vertical and horizontal disintegration to a market characterized by decentralization and intra-modal competition. We also analyze the current market situation, in terms of the actors and their roles, and industrial organization measures. This assessment is used to discuss the sustainability of the current regulatory structure, concluding that although it seems more sustainable than in the past, regulators will sooner or later have to deal with some of its inconsistencies. 1 Introduction Since the late 1980s, several countries in Europe have gradually started to reform their national railway monopolies, using vertical separation of infrastructure from operations, introducing intra-modal competition by various procedures and contracts, and sometimes partial privatization of the railway industry. While some countries have clearly been pioneers in this respect, we have also seen the rise of common EU policies, eventually affecting all member states. In this paper, we discuss the Swedish process of reforming the railways in the past decades. The first part of the paper deals with the economic and legal reasons for a deregulation of the railway sector and discusses the potential contribution of case study research of regulatory reforms. In a second part of the paper, we turn to Sweden, looking at the development since 1988, including the most important effects and the current market situation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Transport Administration Annual Report 2017 Performance Report Operating Areas
    The Swedish Transport Administration 2017 Annual Report CONTENTS Performance Report The Director-General’s Report 4 The Swedish Transport Administration in brief 6 Results of the operations 8 Operating areas 8 Planning measures 13 Planning traffic 27 Maintenance 30 Traffic management and other operations 38 Investments 42 Disbursement of operational grants and other support 58 Contract work 61 Research and innovation 65 Other reporting requirements 68 Competence provision 74 Internal governance and control 78 Financial report 80 Statement of financial performance 81 Balance sheet 82 Appropriation account, including presentation of authorisations83 Cash flow analysis 86 Summary of key figures 87 Notes 88 Signing of the Annual Report 98 Auditor’s Report for the Swedish Transport Administration 201799 Board of Directors 102 Management group 103 About the annual report: Certain figures are followed by a further figure within brackets. Unless otherwise stated, this refers to the previous year’s figure. As the annual report includes many monetary amounts, the abbreviations SEK thousand (thousand kronor), MSEK (million kronor) and BSEK (billion kronor) are used. 2 The Swedish Transport Administration 2017 Annual Report PERFORMANCE REPORT The Swedish Transport Administration 2017 Annual Report 3 Performance Report The Director-General’s Report The Director-General’s Report In 2017, the future issues characterised our operations. On 31 August, we submitted our proposal on a national plan for the transportation system in 2018-2029. The premise of the contents is to contribute to a modern, effective and sustaina- ble transportation system. The measures in the plan should also vehicles can be used to develop winter conditions are created for commuting address six prioritised social chal- road maintenance so that the right skid to work and for housing construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Bortom Järnvägsknuten SOU 2015:110 Volym 2 Del 4 Bilagedel
    Bilaga 13 Fordon vid Sveriges järnvägar 2014 – Analys av Transportstyrelsens fordonsregister Bo-Lennart Nelldal Professor emeritus Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan 229 SOU 2015:110 Bilaga 13 Innehållsförteckning Förord ............................................................................. 235 Sammanfattning .............................................................. 237 1 Inledning ................................................................ 246 1.1 Bakgrund ............................................................................... 246 1.2 Syfte ....................................................................................... 246 1.3 Metod ..................................................................................... 246 1.4 Avgränsning .......................................................................... 247 1.5 Några begreppsförklaringar ................................................. 247 2 Transportstyrelsens fordonsregister ............................ 248 2.1 Inledning................................................................................ 248 2.2 Transportstyrelsens register för järnvägsfordon ................. 250 2.3 Intressanta faktorer för utredningen ................................... 255 3 Inledande granskning av fordonsregistret ................... 257 3.1 Inledning................................................................................ 257 3.2 Loktyp och spårvidd ............................................................. 257 3.3 Normalspåriga lok i kommersiell trafik
    [Show full text]
  • Trains Are a Prerequisite for a Sustainable Sweden
    We bring people closer together, every day 2016 Annual and Sustainability Report Contents Significant events in 2016 1 SJ — a sustainable company 2 7 keys to the future of rail 4 CEO’s statement 10 Operating environment and market 12 Stakeholders 16 Business mission and business model 18 Strategy 20 Customer offering 22 Chairman’s statement 24 Annual Report Directors’ Report 26 Responsible management 29 SJ’s scorecard 30 Employees 31 Partnership and Resources 33 Society 34 Customer 36 Process 37 How we generate punctuality 38 Finance 39 Proposed remuneration policies for senior executives 40 Appropriation of profits 40 Multi-year summary 41 Corporate Governance Report 42 Board of Directors 47 Executive Management 48 The Board’s internal control report 49 Financial statements 50 Accounting policies 61 Notes 65 Auditors’ Report 88 Accounting policies — sustainability 91 Auditors’ review 92 Definitions and glossary 93 About the Annual Report and Sustainability Report Disclaimer The Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of SJ AB (corporate This is a summary of SJ’s 2016 Annual and Sustainability Report , registration number 556196-1599) hereby present SJ’s annual accounts and comprises selected parts of the Report. While every care has and sustainability report for the 2016 financial year. The statutory been taken in the translation of this Report, readers are reminded annual accounts, including the Directors’ Report, which have been that the original and complete Annual and Sustainability Report subjected to an audit are found on pages 26–41 and 50–87. 2016, signed by the SJ Board, is in Swedish. The Responsible management chapter is audited by an external audit- ing firm; refer to the assurance report on page 92.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway in Sweden and Japan – a Comparative Study Report 2014:12
    Railway in Sweden and Japan Report – a comparative study 2014:12 Railway in Sweden and Japan Report – a comparative study 2014:12 Transport Analysis Address: Torsgatan 30 SE-113 59 Stockholm Phone: +46 10 414 42 00 Fax: +46 10 414 42 10 E-mail: [email protected] Webaddress: www.trafa.se Publisher: Brita Saxton Publication date: 2014-11-11 Preface May 2013 saw the signing of a memorandum of cooperation in the railway area between the Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications in Sweden and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT) in Japan. The main purpose of the cooperation is to increase the mutual understanding of policies, laws, and other regulations and of organization and planning in the railway sector in Sweden and Japan and to exchange experience and technology in areas of common interest.1 This comparative case study seeks to increase the mutual understanding of the organization of the railway sector in Sweden and Japan. The study compares the current organization of railways in Sweden and Japan. The scope includes infrastructure and traffic organization, freight and passenger traffic solutions, and railway sector authorities. The project has been managed by Anna Ullström, Transport Analysis (Sweden); Takaaki Furuhashi, MLIT (Japan) submitted comments on chapters four and five. October 2014 Brita Saxton Director General 1 Överenskommelse mellan Näringsdepartementet i Konungariket Sverige och Ministeriet för mark, infrastruktur, transport och turism i Japan om samarbete inom järnvägsområdet, Tokyo den 17 maj 2013, N2013/2621/TE, Stockholm: Näringsdepartementet, 2013. 3 4 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................. 3 1 A comparative Sweden–Japan rail organization study ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Kraftförsörjningsanläggningar
    Verksamhetssystemet Gäller för Version Standard BV koncern 2.0 BVS 543.19300 Giltigt från Giltigt till Antal bilagor 2010-02-05 Tills vidare 1 Diarienummer Ansvarig enhet Fastställd av F 09-16151/EL30 Leveransdivisionen/Anläggning Leif Lindmark, LAKf Handläggare Ersätter Hongbo Jiang, XTBE Nils Rohlsson, LAKfÖf Kraftförsörjningsanläggningar Elektriska krav på fordon med avseende på kompatibilitet med infrastrukturen och andra fordon 1 (6) Verksamhetssystemet – BVMall 1000.3 Dokumentmall, version 3.0 Verksamhetssystemet Innehållsförteckning 1 Syfte.............................................................................................................................3 2 Omfattning ...................................................................................................................3 3 Definitioner och förkortningar ......................................................................................3 3.1 Definitioner.....................................................................................................................3 3.2 Förkortningar ..................................................................................................................3 4 Ansvar ..........................................................................................................................4 5 Elektriska krav på fordon med avseende på kompatibilitet med infrastrukturen och andra fordon .................................................................................5 6 Hjälpmedel och referenser ...........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Nya Fordon 1981–2006
    KTH_nya_fordon_omslag 06-12-11 11.14 Sida 2 NYA FORDON 1981–2006 Särtryck ur Järnvägen 150 år BO-LENNART NELLDAL KTH_nya_fordon_omslag 06-12-11 11.14 Sida 3 Avd för trafik och logistik KTH 100 44 Stockholm Tel: 08-790 60 00 www.infra.kth.se/jvg Nya fordon 1981–2006 Särtryck ur Järnvägen 150 år Bo-Lennart Nelldal JÄRNVÄGEN 150 ÅR (Stockholm, 2005) utgavs inför Sveriges järnvägars 150-årsjubileum 2006 av Informationsförlaget och Banverket. Särtrycket publiceras med tillstånd av Informationsförlaget och Banverket Första upplagan © 2006 Informationsförlaget, Banverket och Bo-Lennart Nelldal GRAFISK FORM: Kate Meurling, Qwack Text&Bild HB TRYCK: Intellecta Docusys AB, Solna 2006 TRITA-TEC-RR 06-003 ISSN 1653-4484 ISBN 13: 978-91-85539-09-3 ISBN 10: 91-85539-09-0 KTH_nya_fordon_inlagan 06-12-09 16.42 Sida 1 • BO-LENNART NELLDAL 1 Nya fordon 1981–2006 BO-LENNART NELLDAL Persontrafik Läget 1981 Persontrafiken var på rekordnivå 1981. Lågpriser hade införts 1979 som följd av ett politiskt beslut. Det innebar en stor ökning av resandet. SJ fyllde 125 år 1981 och man hade en speciell jubileums- biljett, som innebar att man fick åka hur långt som helst för 125 kr. Aldrig förr hade så många tagit tåget. Vagnparken var hårt ansträngd. Basen utgjor- des av 1960-talsvagnarna. De första 80-talsvag- narna hade börjat levereras. En hel del vagnar och liggvagnskapaciteten hade utökats. Det fanns 1980-talsvagnen var en stabil från 1930- och 1940-talen måste därför användas restaurangvagnar i många tåg. konstruktion som målades brun för att klara trafikökningen. Det var loktågen Man kan säga att 1981 befann sig persontrafi- innan designprogrammen tog vid, här en B7.
    [Show full text]