Pre-Revolution Gallery Walk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pre-Revolution Gallery Walk Small Revolt- The Republic of Fredonia The first clash between colonists and Mexican authorities came in 1826. The year before the Mexican government awarded an empresario contract to Haden Edwards to settle 800 families in the Nacogdoches area. When Edwards arrived he discovered many Tejanos and other settlers from U.S. (Anglos) already living on the land. His contract stated that he was to give those settlers rights if they could show him a legal title to the land. Most of the settlers did not have a title to the land. Edwards gave them three options – (1) show a clear title to the land to him (2) you could purchase a title from him (3) you could move away. This angered many of the settlers. Jose Antonio Saucedo, a political chief for Mexico would not allow Edwards to charge these settlers, for any land titles. This angers Haden Edwards and he decides to rebel against Mexico. Haden Edwards and his brother Benjamin Edwards declared their colony independent from Mexico. They made an alliance with Richard Fields, a Cherokee chief and his people in East Texas. Small Revolt- The Republic of Fredonia December 16, 1826, Edwards led a group of 15-30 men and took over the Old Stone Fort in Nacogdoches. They created a flag bearing the words “Independence, Liberty, & Justice” and proclaimed the Republic of Fredonia. This was the start of an event known as the Fredonian Rebellion. ‘Fredonia’ The Edwards brothers asked for Stephen F. Austin’s help and from the United States, but they received no assistance. In fact, Stephen F. Austin offered to help the Mexican government put down the Fredonian Revolt with volunteers from his colony. The Mexican army was sent to put down the rebellion. They marched from San Antonio to Nacogdoches in January 1827, the Fredonian Rebellion collapsed. Some were captured but most of those involved crossed the Sabine River into U.S. land to escape the Mexicans. Inspection of Texas- Mier y Teran Investigates Nacogdoches The Fredonian Revolt was a minor event. Most Anglos and Tejanos did not support Edwards or his rebellion. This event made Mexican officials suspicious of the settlers. Many Mexican officials thought that the Fredonian Revolt was a plan by Americans to take Texas and join the United States. 200 Mexican soldiers were sent to Nacogdoches to prevent anymore uprisings from the settlers. The United States ambassador to Mexico made a proposal, that Mexico should sell Texas to the United States. This event caused Mexico’s suspicions of Anglos wanting Texas to join the U.S. to continue to grow. The Mexican government sent an inspection group to Texas led by Manuel de Mier y Teran. While inspecting Texas, Teran noticed that the Anglo influence was strong. In most settlements, Anglos outnumbered Tejanos 10:1. Manuel de Mier y Teran Inspection of Texas- Mier y Teran Investigates Teran sent a report back to Mexico City. In his report, he expressed his concern about the American influence in Texas. He made recommendations and stated that if the Mexican government did not act at once, Texas would be “lost forever” to the Anglo settlers. As a result of Teran’s report Mexico will create the infamous- Law of April 6, 1830. Slaveholders in Texas became worried about the new laws that Mexico was passing. In 1829 the president of Mexico issued a decree abolishing slavery on all Mexican lands. Anglo colonists in Texas tried to persuade the Mexican government to exempt Texas from this decree. Although slavery was exempted for a time, most slaveholders were fearful that Mexico would eventually ban slavery in the province of Texas. An abolition of slavery would mean an economic downfall to large, land owning Anglos in Texas. New Laws- Law of April 6, 1830 On April 6, 1830, the Centralist government in Mexico issued a new law based on the reports and recommendations from Manuel Mier y Teran’s inspection of Texas. A Centralist believes all the power should be with the National government and State government power should be limited. Law of April 6, 1830 o No Immigration from the U.S. (No more Anglos) o Cancelled all unfulfilled empresario contracts. o Encouraged Mexican & European immigration o No more slaves could be brought into Texas (Mexico) o Placed a customs duty (tax) on all goods from the U.S. o Established new forts to prevent smuggling & to enforce the new laws Anglo citizens thought that this new law is unfair and discriminating toward whites. Most Anglo prosperity depended slave labor for cash crops, and trade with the United States. Many settlers in Texas had friends and family who wanted to come to Texas, but now would not be allowed. This becomes an early turning point in bad relations with Texas colonists and the Mexican government. Soon, Anglos and the Mexican government were very distrustful of each other. Protests- Settlers Protest Anahuac The first serious conflict over Mexico’s new law of April 6, 1830 occurred at the port town of Anahuac. A small Mexican garrison (soldiers) were stationed there to control the shipping and enforce the collection of customs duties (taxes) on goods. Colonel (Juan) John Bradburn was the commander of the Mexican garrison at Anahuac. Bradburn fought with Texan colonists living in Anahuac, due to accusations that he stole supplies and refused to give up runaway slaves. The tax collector at Anahuac attempted to collect customs duties on goods from the United States. This angered the Texas merchants. Now, they would have to travel long distances to file paperwork to give permission for imported goods to cross the border into Mexico. Protests- Settlers Protest Anahuac In May 1832, Juan (John) Bradburn arrested and imprisoned two lawyers- William B. Travis and Patrick Jack for interfering in his efforts to enforce the laws. About 160 Texas settlers from Brazoria and San Felipe marched to Anahuac and demanded Travis’s and Jack’s release. A small skirmish, or fight, takes place between the Mexican garrison and the Texas settlers. Bradburn agreed to release the two prisoners if the Texan colonists would retreat from Anahuac. Some settlers wouldn’t retreat, so Bradburn didn’t release the prisoners and he called for more Mexican troops to Anahuac. After another skirmish with the Mexican garrison, the Texan colonists needed more weapons. While the colonists camped at Turtle Bayou, located in between Liberty and Anahuac, a Texan colonist John Austin went to go get a cannon. Statements from the Colonists- Turtle Bayou Resolutions While waiting for John Austin to return with a cannon, the rest of the Texas colonists wrote down formal statements, called resolutions, that have come to be known as the Turtle Bayou Resolutions. Santa Anna was leading a revolt in Mexico against the Centralist’s Mexican President Anastasio Bustamante. Bustamante was unpopular with colonists because he was not following the Mexican Constitution of 1824. Santa Anna promised to support the Mexican Constitution of 1824, if he became the new president of Mexico. Final result at Anahuac: Colonel Bradburn was removed from command by another Mexican officer. Travis and Jack were released from prison. Mexican soldiers left Anahuac to fight for Santa Anna in Mexico City. More Fighting- Clash at Velasco On June 26, 1832 a skirmish between Texan colonists and the Mexican army occurred at Velasco, Texas. John Austin and a group of Texan colonists loaded a cannon onto a ship they picked up in Brazoria. A Mexican commander Colonel Domingo de Ugartechea wouldn’t let them pass at the Brazos River, this resulted in Texans and Mexican soldiers fighting. Fighting at the Battle of Velasco was bitter and men were killed on both sides. When the Mexican soldiers ran out of ammunition, Colonel Ugartechea and the Mexican garrison surrendered. After the victory, Texan colonist John Austin sailed on to Anahuac with the cannon. When he arrived he discovered that William B. Travis and Patrick Jack had already been released from prison. Colonists Assemble- Conventions of 1832 & 1833 Texan colonists wanted to discuss changes they wanted. Fifty-eight delegates from different parts of Texas met at San Felipe on October 1, 1832 as part of the Convention of 1832. Stephen F. Austin was elected president, or leader of the convention. Dear Santa Anna Please make these changes • Texas should be a separate Mexican state from Coahuila • Anglo immigration be allowed from the U.S. again • Exemption from import taxes • Better education facilities • More protection from Indians • Land titles to settlers living in East Texas -Best Regards Texas settlers For various reasons, these resolutions were not delivered to Santa Anna in Mexico City. Colonists Assemble- Conventions of 1832 & 1833 A few months later, another group Texan colonists called for another convention at San Felipe on April 1, 1833. Among the new delegates at the convention was Sam Houston, representing Nacogdoches. Sam Houston The Convention of 1833 adopted resolutions like those from the Convention of 1832. The Convention of 1833 also prepared a new Texas constitution, as a separate Mexican state from Coahuila. Mexican province of Coahuila y Texas Stephen F. Austin, Dr. James B. Miller, and Erasmo Seguin were chosen to carry the resolutions to Mexico City. Miller and Seguin did not make the trip, so Stephen F. Austin went to Mexico City alone. Austin Goes to Mexico City- Austin’s Mission is Stalled April 1833, Stephen F. Austin left San Felipe and began the long trip to Mexico City. After 3 months, he made it to the Mexican capital. When he arrived, Santa Anna was out of town. The Mexican government was not organized. A cholera epidemic raged in Mexico City, thousands were dying from the deadly bacteria.
Recommended publications
  • “I Go for Independence”: Stephen Austin and Two Wars for Texan Independence
    “I go for Independence”: Stephen Austin and Two Wars for Texan Independence A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by James Robert Griffin August 2021 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by James Robert Griffin B.S., Kent State University, 2019 M.A., Kent State University, 2021 Approved by Kim M. Gruenwald , Advisor Kevin Adams , Chair, Department of History Mandy Munro-Stasiuk , Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………...……iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………v INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………..1 CHAPTERS I. Building a Colony: Austin leads the Texans Through the Difficulty of Settling Texas….9 Early Colony……………………………………………………………………………..11 The Fredonian Rebellion…………………………………………………………………19 The Law of April 6, 1830………………………………………………………………..25 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….32 II. Time of Struggle: Austin Negotiates with the Conventions of 1832 and 1833………….35 Civil War of 1832………………………………………………………………………..37 The Convention of 1833…………………………………………………………………47 Austin’s Arrest…………………………………………………………………………...52 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….59 III. Two Wars: Austin Guides the Texans from Rebellion to Independence………………..61 Imprisonment During a Rebellion……………………………………………………….63 War is our Only Resource……………………………………………………………….70 The Second War…………………………………………………………………………78 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….85
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Lopez De Santa Anna ➢ in 1833 Santa Anna Was Elected President of Mexico, After Overthrowing Anastacio Bustamante
    Road To Revolution PoliticAL uNREST IN TEXAS ➢ Haden Edwards received his Empresario contract from the Mexican Government in 1825. ➢ This contract allowed him to settle 800 families near Nacogdoches. ➢ Upon arrival, Edwards found that there had been families living there already. These “Old Settlers” were made up of Mexicans, Anglos, and Cherokees. ➢ Edwards’s contract required him to respect the property rights of the “old settlers” but he thought some of those titles were fake and demanded that people pay him additional fees for land they had already purchased. Fredonian Rebellion ➢ After Edward’s son-in-law was elected alcalde of the settlement, “old settlers” suspected fraud. ➢ Enraged, the “old settlers” got the Mexican Government to overturn the election and ultimately cancel Edwards’s contract on October 1826. ➢ Benjamin Edwards along with other supporters took action and declared themselves free from Mexican rule. Fredonian Rebellion (cont.) ➢ The Fredonian Decleration of Independance was issued on December 21, 1826 ➢ On January 1827, the Mexican government puts down the Fredonian Rebellion, collapsing the republic of Fredonia. MIer y Teran Report ➢ At this point, Mexican officials fear they are losing control of Texas. ➢ General Manuel de Mier y Teran was sent to examine the resources and indians of Texas & to help determine the formal boundary with Louisiana. Most importantly to determine how many americans lived in Texas and what their attitudes toward Mexico were. ➢ Mier y Teran came up with recommendations to weaken TX ties with the U.S. so Mexico can keep TX based on his report. His Report: His Recommendations: ➢ Mexican influence ➢ To increase trade between decreased as one moved TX & Mexico instead with northward & eastward.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephenville Curriculum Document Social Studies Grade: 7 Course: Texas History Bundle (Unit) 5 Est
    STEPHENVILLE CURRICULUM DOCUMENT SOCIAL STUDIES GRADE: 7 COURSE: TEXAS HISTORY BUNDLE (UNIT) 5 EST. NUMBER OF DAYS: 20 UNIT 5 NAME REVOLUTION AND REPUBLIC With tensions increasing between the Mexican government and American settlers in Texas, diplomacy gave way to Unit Overview Narrative inevitable conflict that erupted into war. Emerging victorious, Texas separated itself from Mexico and became its own Republic. Generalizations/Enduring Understandings Concepts Guiding/Essential Questions Learning Targets Formative Assessments Summative Assessments TEKS Specifications (1) History. The student understands traditional historical points of reference in Texas history. The Texans earned their independence from Mexico student is expected to: (A) identify the major eras in Texas history, Events: describe their defining characteristics, and Battle of Gonzales explain why historians divide the past into eras, Alamo TEKS (Grade Level) / Specifications including Natural Texas and its People; Age of Goliad Massacre Contact; Spanish Colonial; Mexican National; Battle of San Jacinto Revolution and Republic; Early Statehood; Texas Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo in the Civil War and Reconstruction; Cotton, Cattle, and Railroads; Age of Oil; Texas in the People: Great Depression and World War II; Civil Rights Sam Houston and Conservatism; and Contemporary Texas; William B. Travis (B) apply absolute and relative chronology James Fannin through the sequencing of significant Antonio López de Santa Anna individuals, events, and time periods; Juan N. Seguín (C) explain the significance of the following 1836- Texans earned their independence from Mexico dates: 1519, mapping of the Texas coast and through a series of events including the siege of the Alamo, first mainland Spanish settlement; 1718, the massacre at Goliad, and the battle of San Jacinto.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen F. Austin and the Empresarios
    169 11/18/02 9:24 AM Page 174 Stephen F. Austin Why It Matters Now 2 Stephen F. Austin’s colony laid the foundation for thousands of people and the Empresarios to later move to Texas. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA Moses Austin, petition, 1. Identify the contributions of Moses Anglo American colonization of Stephen F. Austin, Austin to the colonization of Texas. Texas began when Stephen F. Austin land title, San Felipe de 2. Identify the contributions of Stephen F. was given permission to establish Austin, Green DeWitt Austin to the colonization of Texas. a colony of 300 American families 3. Explain the major change that took on Texas soil. Soon other colonists place in Texas during 1821. followed Austin’s lead, and Texas’s population expanded rapidly. WHAT Would You Do? Stephen F. Austin gave up his home and his career to fulfill Write your response his father’s dream of establishing a colony in Texas. to Interact with History Imagine that a loved one has asked you to leave in your Texas Notebook. your current life behind to go to a foreign country to carry out his or her wishes. Would you drop everything and leave, Stephen F. Austin’s hatchet or would you try to talk the person into staying here? Moses Austin Begins Colonization in Texas Moses Austin was born in Connecticut in 1761. During his business dealings, he developed a keen interest in lead mining. After learning of George Morgan’s colony in what is now Missouri, Austin moved there to operate a lead mine.
    [Show full text]
  • LOTS of LAND PD Books PD Commons
    PD Commons From the collection of the n ^z m PrelingerTi I a JjibraryJj San Francisco, California 2006 PD Books PD Commons LOTS OF LAND PD Books PD Commons Lotg or ^ 4 I / . FROM MATERIAL COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF TEXAS BASCOM GILES WRITTEN BY CURTIS BISHOP DECORATIONS BY WARREN HUNTER The Steck Company Austin Copyright 1949 by THE STECK COMPANY, AUSTIN, TEXAS All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine or newspaper. PRINTED AND BOUND IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PD Books PD Commons Contents \ I THE EXPLORER 1 II THE EMPRESARIO 23 Ml THE SETTLER 111 IV THE FOREIGNER 151 V THE COWBOY 201 VI THE SPECULATOR 245 . VII THE OILMAN 277 . BASCOM GILES PD Books PD Commons Pref<ace I'VE THOUGHT about this book a long time. The subject is one naturally very dear to me, for I have spent all of my adult life in the study of land history, in the interpretation of land laws, and in the direction of the state's land business. It has been a happy and interesting existence. Seldom a day has passed in these thirty years in which I have not experienced a new thrill as the files of the General Land Office revealed still another appealing incident out of the history of the Texas Public Domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Define 1. States' Rights
    Chapter 9 Define 1. States’ rights – Theory that a _________ could choose whether to obey or enforce federal laws. 2. Nationalist – a person who __________ policies that _________ national interests. 3. Provision – A specific ___________________ set by a law. 4. Customs duty – a ______ that is collected on ________ that are taken into our out of a country. 5. Allegiance - ________________ 6. Centralist – a supporter of ___________ national government and _______ state power. 7. Resolution – a formal statement of a __________, ____________ or course of action by an official group. 8. Delegate – a person who ____________ others. 9. Faction – a group of ____________ who share a viewpoint on an issue. 10. Siege- a lengthy military __________ on a fortified place. 11. Provisional government – a group of ________ who make laws and provide services on a ____________ basis. Identify Section 1 1. Haden Edwards – received empresarial _________, but the grant was taken away 2. Fredonian Rebellion – Clash between___________ colonists and the Mexican government 3. Manuel Mier y Teran – a commander sent to investigate the ___________ in Texas. 4. Law of April 6, 1830 – outlawed ______________ from the US to Texas and cancelled all empresarial grants that had not been fulfilled. Section 2 12. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna – launched a revolution in _______ against President Bustamante. 13. John Davis Bradburn – Mexican official that was directed to __________ laws 14. Anahuac – location of the customs house on _____________ Bay 15. Turtle Bayou Resolutions – resolutions where colonist pledged their _________ to Mexico and support for Santa Anna 16. Battle of Velasco – first battle where __________ and Mexican soldiers shot at each other 17.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas Revolution in Nacogdoches
    The Texas Revolution in Nacogdoches Scan this QR code with your smart phone to see more information about The Texas Revolution in Nacogdoches Misty Hurley, a Graduate If you do not have a QR Student in Public History at Stephen F. Austin State code scanner, you may University, created this visit the following brochure as part of her thesis website for more on cemetery preservation and information: creation of interpretive http://www.sfasu.edu/ materials connecting Oak Grove Cemetery of heritagecenter/7042.asp Nacogdoches with historic sites, museums, artifacts, and archival records. The Texas Revolution is significant in the history of Nacogdoches because citizens of Nacogdoches The First Shots served in the Texan This project has been created of the Texas Army and signed the in conjunction with the Texas Declaration of Center for Regional Heritage Revolution Independence. Research at SFASU. Photograph courtesy of the East Texas Research Center. Government passed the Law of April 6, 1830 The large number of Anglos entering Texas which closed the borders of Texas to immigrants, Visit these sites in the early 1800s, either with the sponsorship of an suspended all land grants, required all trade to be empressario or illegally, began to worry the conducted with Mexico, and allowed the associated with Mexican government who noticed that settlers were Mexican government to collect customs. The the Texas not taking their oaths of allegiance and agreements reaction of Texans to the Law of April 6, 1830, is with the government seriously. Individuals who called the Disturbances of 1832, is considered the Revolution in made their homes here at this time include future beginning of the Texas Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bitter Division Evolves of 1832 and 1833 Established the Foundations of an Independent Texas
    TXSE_3_09_p190-209 11/26/02 2:55 PM Page 196 Why It Matters Now Early battles and the Conventions 2 A Bitter Division Evolves of 1832 and 1833 established the foundations of an independent Texas. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA Antonio López de Santa Anna, 1. Describe the controversy surrounding Clashes between Texas colonists and allegiance, centralist, the Constitution of 1824. Mexican leaders over states’ rights John Davis Bradburn, Anahuac, 2. Explain the significance of the Turtle led Texans to petition for a separate Turtle Bayou Resolutions, Bayou Resolutions. state. resolution, Battle of Velasco, 3. Identify the events that led to the delegate, Convention of 1832, arrest of Stephen F. Austin. Convention of 1833 WHAT Would You Do? Imagine that you are a Texas colonist. You are unhappy with some Write your response of the changes that the Mexican government has made. You and to Interact with History the other colonists want to let the Mexican leaders know that you in your Texas Notebook. are upset, but you do not want to appear as if you are rebelling against the government. You decide to write a letter to the government officials. What would you include in your letter? Unrest in Texas The Law of April 6, 1830, marked a turning point in the relation- ship between the Texas colonists and the Mexican government. The most obvious sign of this strained relationship was the sending of Mexican soldiers into Texas. The soldiers were assigned the task of collecting the customs duties. Although military forces were already stationed at Nacogdoches, Bexar, San Antonio, and Goliad, additional troops arrived at these locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas As a Province and Republic 1795-1845 Reel Listing
    Texas as a Province and Republic 1795-1845 Reel Listing Advocate of the People's Rights, Brazoria. Alsbury, Horace A., d. 1847. Extra. Brazoria, Wednesday, March 27, 1834. To the People of Texas. [Brazoria: Printed at the Office of the Advocate of [Brazoria: Printed by F.C. Gray]. [1835] the People's Rights]. [1834] 53; [Text begins:] Arriving this day from Monterray 42; [Published "for the sole purpose of laying before [sic] ... [continues with] information which I possess the public" a letter from Stephen F. Austin to the in regard to the designs of the Mexican Government Ayuntamiento of San Felipe de Austin dated towards the people of Texas ... [Signed and dated at "Monterry [sic], Jan. 17, 1834.", but including a end:] Horatio A. Alsberry [sic]. Columbia, August number of other items. Text begins:] The present 28th, 1835.; Broadside in two columns. 19.3 x 15.4 Extra closes the career of the "Advocate," until the cm.; This handbill, from which Dr. Barker in Johnson return of Oliver H. Allen, the Editor, who is now and Barker, Texas and Texans, quotes at considerable absent in the U.S. of the North ...; Broadsheet, both length in Vol. I, p. 243, gives a report from Alsbury, sides in three columns. 45.5 x 30 cm.; This is one of just back from Mexico, that the Mexican government the letters written by Austin after his arrest at Saltillo plans to establish an "arbitrary despotism" in Texas, on January 3, 1834, when on his way back to Texas "drive from the country a number of our principal from his mission to Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia-Brazoria HISTORICAL ARCHIVES
    Columbia-Brazoria HISTORICAL ARCHIVES Table of Contents Page Topic 1 Table of Contents 2 Brazoria 3 Brazoria Residents in History 4 Columbia & Brazoria Schools Unite 5 East Columbia 6 Historical Points of Interest in Brazoria County 10 The Masonic Oak 11 Sofie Herzog, 1st Woman Surgeon in Texas 12 Superintendents/Head Coaches of CBISD 13 Varner Hogg Plantation 15 West Columbia, 1st Capitol of Texas 16 Where the Texas Revolution Began 18 Wild Peach 19 References Public Relations 1 Columbia-Brazoria ISD Columbia-Brazoria HISTORICAL ARCHIVES sulfur field nearby and the building of a traffic Brazoria bridge began to revive the town. Its population reached 1,291 by 1962 and 3,025 by 1987, when Brazoria had some fifty businesses. The Clemens “Brazoria, “I know of no other like it in the world” Unit, a prison where inmates raise livestock and Stephen F. Austin crops, is on 8,116 acres of land just south of the townsite. Each October Brazoria hosts a Bluegrass “Brother James lives in a new town we laid off on and Gospel Fall Festival, and its old town area is of the Brazos river, 15 miles from its mouth, called historic interest. In 1990 the community reported a Brassoria – a name I gave it for the single reason population of 2,717. In 2000 the population was that I know of no other like it in the world,” wrote 2,787. Stephen F. Austin to W. C. Carr on March 4, 1829. Brazoria’s place in Texas history is as unique as its name. Brazoria, more than any other place, was the “hotbed of discontent” from which the Texas Revolution was born.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] [Greek Map of the Americas.] ΧΑΡΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΕΚ ΤΟΥ ΑΤΛΑΝΤΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΗΡ. ΛΑΖΑΡΙΔΟΥ ΕΝ ΑΘΗΝΑΙΣ 1861. [Map of the Americas... Lazaridou in Athens 1861] Stock#: 55792 Map Maker: Lazaridou Date: 1861 Place: Athens Color: Hand Colored Condition: VG- Size: 19 x 25 inches Price: $ 1,900.00 Description: Fredonia in Texas! Fascinating Greek Map of the Americas, Published in Athens During the American Civil War. Lithographed folding map of the Americas entirely in Greek. Published in Athens by Lazaridou in 1861, during the American Civil War. The map features interesting cartographic eccentricities: In Ohio, the authors have placed "Philadelphia" and a river to the flowing northward to the east of it, and having been convinced of their error, they crossed both out, rather than erasing them from the matrix. The Missouri River is mislabeled the Mississippi River. Drawer Ref: America 2 Stock#: 55792 Page 1 of 3 Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] [Greek Map of the Americas.] ΧΑΡΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΕΚ ΤΟΥ ΑΤΛΑΝΤΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΗΡ. ΛΑΖΑΡΙΔΟΥ ΕΝ ΑΘΗΝΑΙΣ 1861. [Map of the Americas... Lazaridou in Athens 1861] The Texan Gulf Coast is labeled "Fredonia". A late example of that appellation. Elsewhere the toponyms adhere more closely to the conventions of the time: Alaska is Russian America. In the American West, there is New California, New Mexico, and Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • John Sprowl & the Failed Fredonian Rebellion
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 48 Issue 2 Article 6 10-2010 The Road from Nacogdoches to Natchitoches: John Sprowl & the Failed Fredonian Rebellion Rick Sherrod Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Sherrod, Rick (2010) "The Road from Nacogdoches to Natchitoches: John Sprowl & the Failed Fredonian Rebellion," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 48 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol48/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Road/rom Nacogdoches to Natchitoches: John Sprowl & the Failed Fredonian Rebellion By RICK SHERROD bit more than one hundred miles ofthe old EI Camino Real separated Natchitoches, the most important Aninetccnth century town in northwest Louisiana, from Nacogdoches, the oldest continuously inhabited city within the currcnt borders ofTexas. The story ofeach city's founding is rooted in a fascinating (iffanciful) Caddo legend about twin brothers. To forestall any future conflict between the families of his two sons, a Caddo chief instructed the twins to depart their tribal home on the Sabine. The brother "Natchitoches" traveled three days toward the rising sun while the other twin, HNacogdoches," journeyed three days to the west. In each respective location, both men raised their families and developed settlements. With sufficient insulation to prevent frictions over rights to hunting grounds, "the two brothers remained friendly and the road between the two communities was well traveled."1 Regular nlovement between the two settlements continued long after the Indian population of the area had vanished.
    [Show full text]