Sur La Situation Concernant La Glorification Du Nazisme, La

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sur La Situation Concernant La Glorification Du Nazisme, La Traduction non-officielle Sur la situation concernant la glorification du nazisme, la propagation du néonazisme et des autres pratiques permettant l’aggravation des formes modernes du racisme, de la discrimination raciale, de la xénophobie et des formes d'intolérance qui y sont associées RAPPORT DU MINISTÈRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES DE RUSSIE 2019 Table des matières Introduction ................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Autriche ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Australie ........................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Azerbaïdjan ................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Albanie .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Argentine ....................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Arménie ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Belgique ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Bulgarie ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Bosnie-Herzégovine ...................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Brésil ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Grande-Bretagne ........................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Hongrie .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Allemagne ..................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Grèce ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Géorgie .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Danemark ...................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Israël .............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Inde ................................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Irlande ............................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 2 Islande ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Espagne ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Italie ............................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Kazakhstan .................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Canada ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Qatar .............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Chypre ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Chine ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Cuba ............................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Kuwait ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Lettonie .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Lituanie .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Luxembourg .................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Malte .............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Maroc ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Moldavie ........................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Pays-Bas ........................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Nouvelle-Zélande .......................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Norvège ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Pologne .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Portugal ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Roumanie....................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Saint-Marin .................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Macédoine du Nord ....................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Serbie ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Slovaquie ....................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Slovénie ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. États-Unis ...................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Tadjikistan ..................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3 Turkménistan ................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Ukraine .......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Uruguay ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Ouzbékistan ................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Finlande ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. France ............................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Croatie ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Monténégro ................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. République tchèque ....................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Chili ............................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Suisse ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Suède ............................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Estonie ........................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Afrique du Sud .............................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Jamaïque ........................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Union européenne ......................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Annexes ......................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Introduction Le présent rapport continue les efforts du Ministère des affaires étrangères de la Fédération de Russie visant à attirer l’attention de la communauté mondiale à la croissance des manifestations du nazisme, du néonazisme, de la xénophobie et de l’intolérance qui y est associée qui est observée dans de nombreux pays du monde. Nous voyons aujourd’hui que, malgré les mécanismes de droit élaborés et fonctionnant dans le cadre de l’ONU, de l’OSCE et du Conseil de l’Europe, qui interdisent, condamnent et préviennent les manifestations de la glorification du nazisme, de la xénophobie et de l’intolérance qui y est associée, la propagande des idées et valeurs nazies se réalise ouvertement dans de nombreux pays, les 4 nationalistes radicaux soulèvent la tête, les tentatives de diviser la société selon la nationalité et la langue s’intensifient. La Fédération de Russie est particulièrement préoccupée par le redressement de la campagne visant à réécrire l’histoire de la seconde guerre mondiale et les tentatives cyniques de blanchir les criminels de guerre et leurs acolytes, ceux qui ont créé et mis en œuvre la théorie de la suprématie raciale, de présenter les collaborationnistes qui ont coopéré avec les nazis comme les participants des mouvements de libération nationale, aussi bien que les efforts blasphémateurs des élites politiques de certains pays de l’Ouest et de l’Europe de l’Est de démolir la mémoire historique. Ces actions irresponsables et incompatibles avec les obligations internationales ont entraîné l’apparition d’une génération en Europe qui ne connait pas la vérité sur la guerre la plus terrible de l’histoire humaine, y compris sur la mission et les nombreux crimes de guerre des branches de l’organisation SS, reconnue criminelle par le tribunal de Nuremberg. Une autre chose inquiétante est la croissance constante du nombre d’incidents xénophobes et racistes, de manifestations du nationalisme agressif, du chauvinisme, des autres formes d’intolérance raciale et religieuse dans l’espace de l’Union européenne, aux États-Unis et au Canada, en Ukraine et dans nombre d’autres pays où l’inaction envers les manifestations du racisme et de l’intolérance est justifiée en évoquant le soi-disant caractère absolu du droit à la liberté d’expression. Dans ce contexte, le problème de la défense des droits des minorités nationales et des groupes ethniques, avant tout des droits à la langue et l’éducation, s’est sérieusement aiguisé dans les pays Baltes et en Ukraine. Les mesures prises dans le domaine concerné peuvent être qualifiées uniquement comme discriminatoires. La Fédération de Russie y voit une menace directe aux valeurs fondamentales de la démocratie et des droits de l’homme, un défi sérieux à la sécurité
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/29/2021 06:39:09AM Via Free Access
    fascism 4 (2015) 209-212 brill.com/fasc Book Review ∵ Mats Deland, Michael Minkenberg and Christin Mays, ed. In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe (Berlin/ Vienna: lit Verlag, 2014). Four years have already passed since Anders Behring Breivik, apparently single-handedly, committed the most murderous and destructive terrorist atrocity by the far right in post-war Europe. In 2011–2012, particularly during his criminal trial in Oslo, there was a lively public debate in in the Scandinavian media as to whether Breivik was a fascist, or represented some other permuta- tion of the contemporary European far right – an Islamophobic ‘counter-jihad- ist’; a militant, conservative nationalist; or a Christian extremist.1 Somewhat counterintuitively, since then relatively little scholarly attention has been devoted within comparative fascist studies to the implications of Breivik’s deeds, ideology, and self-proclaimed pan-European revolutionary movement. The title of this anthology – In the Tracks of Breivik – would suggest that its primary purpose is to map the far right networks of northern and eastern Europe in relation to the terrorist acts of July 22, 2011. Even if we realize that this formulation is an unfortunate literal translation of the Swedish phrase ‘i spåren av [Breivik]’ – for which a more idiomatic English rendering would be ‘in the wake of [Breivik]’, the implication would still be that the findings of the book are located in some direct relation to Breivik and his crimes. Even the promotional blurb on the back cover, as well as the opening and closing words of the introduction, reinforce this expectation.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Kosovar Albanians, Nato's
    VIOLENCE AGAINST KOSOVAR ALBANIANS, NATO’S INTERVENTION 1998-1999 MSF SPEAKS OUT MSF Speaks Out In the same collection, “MSF Speaking Out”: - “Salvadoran refugee camps in Honduras 1988” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - December 2013] - “Genocide of Rwandan Tutsis 1994” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Rwandan refugee camps Zaire and Tanzania 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “The violence of the new Rwandan regime 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Hunting and killings of Rwandan Refugee in Zaire-Congo 1996-1997” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [August 2004 - April 2014] - ‘’Famine and forced relocations in Ethiopia 1984-1986” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [January 2005 - November 2013] - “MSF and North Korea 1995-1998” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [January 2008 - 2014] - “War Crimes and Politics of Terror in Chechnya 1994-2004” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [June 2010 -2014] -”Somalia 1991-1993: Civil war, famine alert and UN ‘military-humanitarian’ intervention” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2013] Editorial Committee: Laurence Binet, Françoise Bouchet-Saulnier, Marine Buissonnière, Katharine Derderian, Rebecca Golden, Michiel Hofman, Theo Kreuzen, Jacqui Tong - Director of Studies (project coordination-research-interviews-editing): Laurence Binet - Assistant: Berengere Cescau - Transcription of interviews: Laurence Binet, Christelle Cabioch, Bérengère Cescau, Jonathan Hull, Mary Sexton - Typing: Cristelle Cabioch - Translation into English: Aaron Bull, Leah Brummer, Nina Friedman, Imogen Forst, Malcom Leader, Caroline Lopez-Serraf, Roger Leverdier, Jan Todd, Karen Tucker - Proof reading: Rebecca Golden, Jacqui Tong - Design/lay out: - Video edit- ing: Sara Mac Leod - Video research: Céline Zigo - Website designer and webmaster: Sean Brokenshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radical Roots of the Alt-Right
    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. The Radical Roots of the Alt-Right Josh Vandiver Ball State University Various source media, Political Extremism and Radicalism in the Twentieth Century EMPOWER™ RESEARCH The radical political movement known as the Alt-Right Revolution, and Evolian Traditionalism – for an is, without question, a twenty-first century American audience. phenomenon.1 As the hipster-esque ‘alt’ prefix 3. A refined and intensified gender politics, a suggests, the movement aspires to offer a youthful form of ‘ultra-masculinism.’ alternative to conservatism or the Establishment Right, a clean break and a fresh start for the new century and .2 the Millennial and ‘Z’ generations While the first has long been a feature of American political life (albeit a highly marginal one), and the second has been paralleled elsewhere on the Unlike earlier radical right movements, the Alt-Right transnational right, together the three make for an operates natively within the political medium of late unusual fusion. modernity – cyberspace – because it emerged within that medium and has been continuously shaped by its ongoing development. This operational innovation will Seminal Alt-Right figures, such as Andrew Anglin,4 continue to have far-reaching and unpredictable Richard Spencer,5 and Greg Johnson,6 have been active effects, but researchers should take care to precisely for less than a decade. While none has continuously delineate the Alt-Right’s broader uniqueness. designated the movement as ‘Alt-Right’ (including Investigating the Alt-Right’s incipient ideology – the Spencer, who coined the term), each has consistently ferment of political discourses, images, and ideas with returned to it as demarcating the ideological territory which it seeks to define itself – one finds numerous they share.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology, Social Basis, Prospects REPORT 2018
    European Centre for Democracy Development Center for Monitoring and Comparative Analysis of Intercultural Communications CONTEMPORARY FAR-RIGHTS Right radicalism in Europe: ideology, social basis, prospects REPORT 2018 Athens-London-Berlin-Paris-Moscow-Krakow-Budapest-Kiev-Amsterdam-Roma 1 Editor in Chief and Project Head: Dr. Valery Engel, Chairman of the Expert Council of the European Centre for Tolerance, principal of the Center for Monitoring and Comparative Analysis of Intercultural Communications Authors: Dr. Valery Engel (general analytics), Dr. Jean-Yves Camus (France), Dr. Anna Castriota (Italy), Dr. Ildikó Barna (Hungary), Bulcsú Hunyadi (Hungary), Dr. Vanja Ljujic (Netherlands), Tika Pranvera (Greece), Katarzyna du Val (Poland), Dr. Semen Charny (Russia), Dr. Dmitry Stratievsky (Germany), Ruslan Bortnik (Ukraine), Dr. Alex Carter (UK) Authors thank the Chairman of the European Centre for Tolerance, Mr. Vladimir Sternfeld, for his financial support of the project CONTEMPORARY FAR-RIGHTS Right radicalism in Europe: ideology, social basis, prospects Report “Contemporary far-rights. Right-wing radicalism in Europe: ideology, social base, prospects" is the result of the work of an international team of experts from 10 European countries. The report answers the question of what is the social basis of European right- wing radicalism and what are the objective prerequisites and possible directions for its development. In addition, the authors answer the question of what stays behind the ideology of modern radicalism, what the sources of funding for right-wing radical organizations are, and who their leaders are. Significant part of information is introduced for the first time. © European Center for Democracy Development, 2018 © Center for Monitoring and Comparative Analysis of Intercultural Communications, 2018 © Institute for Ethnic Policy and Inter-Ethnic Relations Studies, 2018 2 Introduction Radicalism is a commitment to the extreme views and concepts of the social order associated with the possibility of its radical transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Habermann Family Story
    Habermann Family Story Submitted by Ruth Habermann, Givatayim and Eyal Habermann, Shoham The Habermann family were watchmakers for generations and had three jewelry stores - in Drohobycz, Boryslaw and Truskawiec. The Habermanns were one of the well-to-do the families in town. The Germans occupied Drohobycz in the middle of September 1939. Some Ukrainians informed the Germans on the whereabouts of Jonah Habermann. The house was raided by the Germans who did much property damage, but Jonah was in hiding and was not found. Two years later, following the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, the Soviets occupied Drohobycz. All private property was immediately nationalized under Article 11 (prohibition to hold private property). Wealthy families could no longer live in big cities. Judith and Jonah Habermann were forced to live outside of Drohobycz and moved to Truskawiec. Alex Habermann, who was 12 years old, stayed with his maternal grandparents Joseph and Ethel Hershmann in Drohobycz. Alex remembered a Jew who fled from Kraków saying: "When will the Germans came to free us from these Bolsheviks". The Habermann family received a deportation order for Siberia for June 27th, 1941. They were preparing for the journey by hiding assets and packing belongings. On June 22nd, 1941, 5 days before the planned deportation, the Germans breaking the non-aggression pact, invaded the area that was under Russian rule. Judith and Jonah Habermann returned to Drohobycz. After about a week the Germans entered Drohobycz. Following the German invasion, a pogrom carried out by the Ukrainians took place. 900 Jews were murdered. The pogrom was followed by humiliations and degrading jobs such as cleaning the streets, as well as looting and killing by the Ukrainians for 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Records Related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party RG-25.059M
    Selected records related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party RG-25.059M United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW Washington, DC 20024-2126 Tel. (202) 479-9717 e-mail: [email protected] Descriptive summary Title: Selected records related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party Dates: 1834-1948 (inclusive) 1934-1943 (bulk) Accession number: 2009.267 Creator: Partidul Naţional Creştin. Liga Apărării Naţional Creştine Extent: 7,535 digital images 7 microfilm reels (digitized) Repository: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives, 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW, Washington, DC 20024-2126 Languages: Romanian Scope and content of collection Contains records relating to A. C. Cuza, a leading anti-Semite in Romania and the leader of the National Christian Party (PNC) which was in power December 1937 to February 1938. Also contains records relating to Istrate Micescu, the Justice Minister of the PNC administration. Administrative Information Restrictions on access: No restrictions on access. Restrictions on reproduction and use: Restrictions on use. Fair use only. Use only for scientific purposes (not for commercial use) Preferred citation: Preferred citation for USHMM archival collections; consult the USHMM website for guidance. Acquisition information: Source of acquisition is the Arhivele Naţionale ale României (Romanian National Archives), Fond personal A.C. Cuza (inv. 1139) and Fond personal Istrate Miscescu. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives received the collection via the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum International Archives Program in November, 2009. Existence and location of originals: Arhivele Naţionale ale României Historical note The National-Christian Defense League (Romanian: Liga Apararii National Crestine or LANC) was a virulently anti-Semitic political party of Romania formed by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Identitarian Movement
    Identitarian movement The identitarian movement (otherwise known as Identitarianism) is a European and North American[2][3][4][5] white nationalist[5][6][7] movement originating in France. The identitarians began as a youth movement deriving from the French Nouvelle Droite (New Right) Génération Identitaire and the anti-Zionist and National Bolshevik Unité Radicale. Although initially the youth wing of the anti- immigration and nativist Bloc Identitaire, it has taken on its own identity and is largely classified as a separate entity altogether.[8] The movement is a part of the counter-jihad movement,[9] with many in it believing in the white genocide conspiracy theory.[10][11] It also supports the concept of a "Europe of 100 flags".[12] The movement has also been described as being a part of the global alt-right.[13][14][15] Lambda, the symbol of the Identitarian movement; intended to commemorate the Battle of Thermopylae[1] Contents Geography In Europe In North America Links to violence and neo-Nazism References Further reading External links Geography In Europe The main Identitarian youth movement is Génération identitaire in France, a youth wing of the Bloc identitaire party. In Sweden, identitarianism has been promoted by a now inactive organisation Nordiska förbundet which initiated the online encyclopedia Metapedia.[16] It then mobilised a number of "independent activist groups" similar to their French counterparts, among them Reaktion Östergötland and Identitet Väst, who performed a number of political actions, marked by a certain
    [Show full text]
  • The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning
    The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam i The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam ICCT Perspective December 2020 ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution- oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counterterrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counterterrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
    [Show full text]
  • Brenton Tarrant: the Processes Which Brought Him to Engage in Political Violence
    CSTPV Short Papers Brenton Tarrant: the processes which brought him to engage in political violence Beatrice Williamson 1 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Brenton Tarrant .................................................................................................................... 3 Conceptualising Tarrant and his violence ............................................................................. 5 The Lone Actor Puzzle ........................................................................................................... 5 ‘A dark social web’: online ‘radicalisation’ ............................................................................ 7 Online communities: Social Network Ties and Framing .................................................... 7 Funnelling and Streams ..................................................................................................... 9 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 11 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 12 2 Introduction Individual radicalisation is a complex and bespoke process influenced by multiple factors and variables, meaning every individual follows their own path to terrorism and political violence. This paper will endeavour to demonstrate and explore some of the
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.
    [Show full text]