<<

IN :PART I

By A. J. A. (Bram) Janse

For more than 100 years, Africa has pro- lthough have been known for more than duced large commercial quantities of dia- 2,000 years, with the earliest discoveries in , monds and important individual stones. large-scale mining and distribution date only from The earliest official finds were made from the late 1860s and the first finds in Africa. For almost a centu- approximately 1867 onward, in sands and ry, Africa-and especially South AfricaÑdon~inate gravels of the and Vaal Rivers in production, representing more than 98% of world output . Subsequently, diamonds from 1889 to 1959. Many of the most famous stones ever to were found in "hard rock" and, most recently, in off-shore deposits enter the gem market originated from these African deposits. along the western coast of South Africa In addition, much of our current knowledge about diamond and . Important discoveries have occurrences, exploration, and mining comes from the African been made in many other African coun- diamond fields. And the history of these discoveries is among tries. Angola, , Central African the richest in the archives of gemology. Republic, , Namibia, and The first reliable records of diamond finds in Africa date have now joined South Africa as being from the late 1860s ("Diamonds are trumps," April 18, 1867). among the top 10 dian~ond-producing These followed the earlier finds in India several centuries B.C. countries worldwide. Part I of this two- (recorded in Arthasastra and Ratnapariska texts, as part series examines the fascinating histo- reported in Legrand, 1984); in the 10th century A.D. ry of these numerous discoveries in south- (Legrand, 1984); in the 1720s (Sarmento, 1735; Bruton, ern and from the 19th cen- tury to the present. Part II will look at 1978*!; Russia in the 1830s (Rose, 1837, pp. 352-374; Webster, eastern and western Africa, as well as the 1975); the in the 1840s (Shepard, 1846; Kunz, history of diamond prospecting, n~ining, 1892; Sinlzankas, 1976); and in the 1850s and production on the African . (Hargraves, 1851; Atlkson et al., 1990).In most of these earli- er instances, the diamonds were mere mineralogical curiosi- ties, found as occasional by-products in the recovery of from sands and gravels in stream beds. Through the ages, pro- duction from India and Borneo reached only as a triclz- le of large (over one ) stones that were used mainly as adornments for sovereigns and their consorts, with smaller stones used for and cutting tools. The Brazilian deposits provided a steady supply of small stones after 1730 (Lenzen, 1970), but large quantities of stones of significant size (including many 15 ct and above) came only with the exploitation of the South African diamond fields from 1870 onwards (figure 1).In general, this sudden increase in supply coincided with the new wealth generated by the Industrial

228 Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Figure 1. Africa was the dominant source in the world diamond market for almost a hundred years after the fust pieces of rough were reported in South Africa in the 1860s. This suite of jewelry, designed by Gianmaria Bucceflati, was fashioned born predominantly African rough collected over many years. The dia- monds weigh a total of 344.11 carats. Courtesy of Biiccellati of Beverly Hills, California; photo 0Harold o)Erica Van Pelt.

Revolution and the attendant increased demand for excerpts of original documents) or recollections of luxury goods by a broader range of consumers. people directly involved in the events described. Tills article reviews the history of the major dis- Please keep in mind that the quality of reporting in coveries of alluvial diamonds and lzimberlite pipes 19th-century periodicals is often not as high as in throughout the African continent, from the earliest- recent ones, in that there was less opportunity for on- ill February 1867-near Kimberley, in South Africa, the-spot investigation. As a result, much of the evi- to the most recent discovery-in 1990411 the dence was based on hearsay. Likewise, personal rec- , in Algeria (figure 2). The stories of the early ollections often contain incorrect information caused diamond discoveries have been told many times, but by wishful thinking and faulty memory. There are many have become distorted and bowdlerized in the several other interesting stories that could have been retelling. As much as possible, the information pro- told, but they were omitted because they could not vided here has been culled from original sources be substantiated. (archival issues of periodicals and photocopies or The following is a country-by-country account

- - - -. .- (basically, from south to north and from east to west) Wherever two references are quoted with widely different of the progression of major diamond discoveries and years, the first reference indicntes the curliest record that I have exploitation in Africa. Part I surveys the important found, whereas the second reference is the more accessible and con~prehensive.Note that they sometimes differ in detail and diamond-producing countries in southern and central interpretation. Africa. Part IT, to be published in an upcoming issue

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 WESTERN SWflA

SEW , a LEW -!*- LW/ -Em 7 - BWffOWAL .a- IK@Y/' SHAW , 1 COAST o! A

- figure 2. This map of Africa shows the countries in which diamonds and/or l

230 Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 rock" kin~berlitesources. In fact, South Africa is con- sidered the type locality for the occurrence of dia- monds in igneous host rocks, such as lzimberlite pipes, which were first discovered there in 1869 and recognized as such in 1872. The methods and special equipment now used worldwide for the recovery of diamonds were developed here. Diamond production from lzimberlite pipes around Kimberley exceeded one million carats with- in the first year of exploitation by local miners ("dig- gers"). The largest diamond ever found, the Cullinan (3,106 metric carats), and many other very large dia- Figure 3. The 10.73 ct diamond known as monds were found in South Africa. This country has the Eureka was reportedly faceted from the earliest been a steady producer of several n~illionsof carats recorded diamond in Africa, found in late 1866 or annually up to the present, and important new dis- early 1867 on De Kalk farm near the . coveries are still being made. Photo courtesy of . The First Alluvial Diggings. Although a few dia- monds were allegedly found earlier (Balfour, 1992; genuine diamond of 21.3 ct. (It remains unexplained Liddicoat, 1993))the first officially recorded diamond why an experienced diamond cutter, such as Louis on the African continent was found in the southern Hond, would have moved from Holland to Cape henGspherels summer of 186611867, either as early Town before it became known that diamonds were as December 1866 or as late as February 1867 actually found in South Africa. Perhaps the lznowl- (Robertson; 1974*).This stone, which weighed 21.25 edge of earlier diamond finds [see Balfour, 19921 was old carats," was subsequently cut into a 10.73 ct more widespread than has been reported, but this and named the Eureka (figure3). cannot be substantiated.) The actual location of the This stone was found on a farm named De I

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Subsequently, Chalmers wrote that OIReilly then went on to Colesberg where the town clerk, Lorenzo Boyes, sent the stone to Dr. Atherstone by letter, dated March 12, 1867 (see Chaliners' letter of January 20, 1969, cited in Robertson, 1974). Atherstone immediately responded that it was a dia- mond of 21.25 ct, worth £500and that he would like to send it to Colonial Secretary Southey in Cape Town (Atherstonc, 1869).** On April 16 or 17, Southey showed the stone to Ernest Heritte, the French consul, and the above-mentioned Louis Hond, both of whom confirmed Atherstone's asser- tions ("Diamonds are trumps," April 18, 1867). On April 19, the stone was sent by a steamer named the Celt to London for final verification by Garrard and Co., the Crown Jewellers. On July 12, 1867, Southey received a copy of the certificate that Garrard had issued the preceding month (June8), which stated that it was a genuine diamond of good quality, slight- ly colored, and weighed 21.16 ct; they confirmed Dr. Figure 4. The first diamonds reporteknd, subse- quently, most of the major mines-in South Atherstone's value of £50 (Garrard's certificate in Africa were located in the area between the Robertson, 1974).A replica of the stone was exhibit- Oraiige and Vaal Rivers. Note thai the. Kimbarley- ed at the Paris Exhibition later in 1867. The diamond area mines are shown here in relative position, not was subsequently purchased for £50 by Sir Philip precise to scale, because they were clustered ill Wodehouse, governor of the . such a small area. Chalmers' story of the find (littlegirl Jacobs, chil- dren playing with pebbles, Van Nielzerk's interest, etc.) was quoted in the influential lecture on the dis- Schallz Van Nielzerlz, when he was visiting in covery of diamonds in South Africa given by February 1867.* He offered to buy it, but Mrs. Jacobs Professor James Tennant at the Society of Arts on scoffed at the idea of selling a mere pebble and gave it November 23, 1870 (Tennant, 1870).Most early writ- to him (Chalmers' account does not say what the lit- ers and, recently, Bruton (1978) follow Tennant's tle girl thought of this). Chalmers states that "Van account. Nielzerk was a very shrewd man with an enquiring In 1872, OIReilly gave a different version of the turn of mind" and credits him with "bringing to find to Richard Murray, editor of the Diamond Fields the existence of diamonds along the Orange River." Advertiser (publishedin the tent town then called De Van Nielzerlz gave the pebble to a local trader/hunter, Bcers New Rush, later renamed the city of Kimberleyl. John OiRedly, to take it to Hopetown to see if it was OIReilly said that while visiting Van Niekerlz in worth anything, as he thought that it was a diamond. March 1867, he saw Van Nielzerk's little girl playing OIReilly showed it to several people ill Hopetown, with some bright pebbles. He offered to buy a partic- including Chalmers, who all laughed at the idea that ularly shiny one, but Van Niekerlz gave it to him on the pebble might be a diamond. Nevertheless, the understanding that if it was worth something Chalmers says he advised O'Redly to send it to Dr. they would share equally (Murray, 1873).The rest of Atherstone, a physician and self-taught geologist/ the story is as told by Chalmers. - - . - - ,. .- . - -. - - mineralogist living in Grahamstown. * 'The date on the letter from Boyes is reported in A therstone, 1869. Atherstone's reply to Boyes was received in Colesberg on It is strange that Chalmers and Atlierstone described [he April 8. Alherstone determined the specific gravity of the stone, IacobsIVan Niekerk diamond as a white stone. Hond, in his eval- its hardness (it did scratch glass and was not scratched by a atio ion in Capetown, mentioned that it had a small yellow spot hardened steel file), its weight in carats, and its value (probably in one corner ("eengee1 vlekje," h "Eel7 Kciapsche diamant," from the book by leffries, 1750, which includes a manual fir April 30, 1867). Garrard's certificate said "slightly colored" with- establishing the value of a diamond from its weight and dimen- out stating which color (most diamonds from South Africa have sioas). It was a remarkable effort for a self-taught mineralogist a faint yellow ), whereas the Eureka is distinctly yellow. who had never before evaluated a diamond.

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 In a petition to then-governor of the Cape But how did Van Nielzerlz get that idea? It may Colony Sir Henry Barldy, filed January 10, 1872, at have come from a legend among the Boers that dia- De Beers New Rush, O'Reilly claimed to have found monds were collected by Bushmen along the Orange (or at least recognized) the first diamond identified in and Vaal Rivers (Dunn, 1871).There are also indica- South Africa. Again, he referred to a March 1867 visit tions that Van Niekerlz had found diamonds even to Van Nielzerlz, but in this account (reproduced in before he recognized the Jacobs diamond ("Jacobs' Robertson, 1974, pp. 73-74), he claimed to have diamond . . . ,I' June 4, 1867; "Nelly Jacobs . . . ," July picked out the diamond from among Van Niekerk's 30, 1867).In the mid-1860~~the government land sur- collection of stones. He offered to buy it, but Van veyor, Von Ludwig, often stayed at Van Niekerk's Nielzerk gave it to him, saying it belonged to "Daniel house and the two discussed minerals. When he fin- Jacobs' little Bushman boy." In an 1876 account, it ished his survey of farms along the Orange River, was in the hands of a little Griqua servant boy who Von Ludwig gave Van Niekerlz a boolz 011 was minding the children (Matthews, 1878).In 1894, (Beet and Terpend, 1917). OIReilly changed the little Griqua boy to a little Regardless of who actually found the first stone, Hottentot boy. In all of these accounts, the rest of the it created a mild stir of interest among the Boers (pas- story is as told above. turalists of mainly Dutch ancestry) and the Griquas O1Reilly's claim that he was the first to recog- (shepherds of mixed Hottentot/Bushman/Bantu nize the pebble's potential was so successful that the ancestry) living in the general area of the Orange and first boolz on the diamond fields (Reunert, 1893),and the most authoritative textbook on gemstones of that era (Bauer, 1896), gave OIReilly the credit "for Figure 5. Erasmus Jacobs has been credited with establishing the occurrence of diamonds in South finding ihe fust officially recorded diamond on the Africa." Both publications called the first stone the African continent, on his family's farm, De IZalk, "O'Reilly Diamond." in 1866. Tills photo was taken around 1907. An account by a nephew of Van Nielzerlz given to Courtesy of De Beers. George Beet in Kimberley states that it was Erasmus Jacobs (figure5)) second so11 of Daniel Jacobs of De Kalk farm, who found the first diamond (Beet and Terpend, 1917).John Noble, who visited De Kalk, also describes the finder as a young son of Daniel Jacobs, and this ver- sion was adopted by Williams (1905).In a sworn affi- davit, dated August 9, 1932, Erasmus Jacobs stated that he picked up a bright pebble near the dam on his father's farm, De Kalk, in the summer of 1866 when he was 15 years old (in Robertson, 1974).A Hottentot was standing by but had nothing to do with the discovery. Erasmus gave the stone to his little sister (Rielzie). When Van Nielzerlz was visiting a month or two later, Erasmus and his brother and two sisters were playing games with some pebbles, including the bright one. Van Nielzerlz acquired it and then passed it on to OIRedy, who took it to Hopetown and Colesberg. This account ties up everything very neatly-too neatly, perhaps. The native servant is there (Hottentot, Griqua, or Bushman), but is dismissed as irrelevant; the little girl is there, but she got the stone from Erasinus; and OIReilly is just the courier. Robertson (1974)commented that the information in the affidavit might have been obtained by "leading questions," that is, by putting words into Erasinus' mouth. Nevertheless, Van Nielzerlz gets the credit for thinlzing that the bright pebble might be a diamond.

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Vaal Rivers. At least 20 other diamonds turned up frames came into use, and screen sizes went down to during the next two years, found by Griquas and one-sixteenth of an inch (1.6mm, about 0.035 ct). Boers poking around in the gravels of the two rivers Most of the early diamonds were found in the (see Chalmers' "list of 20 diamonds" in Wealzley, Vaal River which, in the area near its confluence 1869; Atherstone, 1869). with the Orange River, flows over amygdaloidal Harry Emanuel, a well-known London jeweler basalt (in fact, andesite). The basalt forms good "trap who had written a textbook on gemstones (1865), sites" for diamonds, with rock bars, potholes, and sent mineralogist James Gregory to South Africa in gravel bars. A party of prospectors from Natal, led by 1868 to check out the discoveries. During his tour a Captain Rolleston, was credited as the first to estab- through the Cape Colony, Gregory did not see any lish that diamonds not only occur lying on the sur- roclzs resembling the nicaceous sandstones and mica face, but also can be recovered by actually digging in schists that had been reported to be the source roclzs the gravel. Their first successful dig was near the for diamonds in Brazil (Claussen, 1841).Consequently, German mission station of Pniel on January 4, 1870 he declared that the discovery was "an imposture, a ("Captain Rolleston's party finds diamonds . . . ,I1 July bubble scheme to drive up land values" (Gregory, 16, 1870; Noble, 1874).* 1868).He said that if there were any diamonds scat- In the early years, then, the South African dia- tered about, they must have been brought there in mond fields did not appear to differ much in charac- the gizzards of ostriches. (Most birds swallow small ter from diamond fields in India, Borneo, or Brazil. stones to help their digestive system; he probably Diamonds were found in alluvial deposits, that is, added the ostriches as an afterthought, because a few unconsolidated sands and gravels located in stream stones as large as several carats were found and beds, flats, and banks, as well as the terraces of rivers. offered for sale while he was in the area.) They were recovered by washing and sieving gravels, Gregory's statements created an uproar in the using picks and shovels and locally made sieves that Cape Colony (Atherstone, 1869). Before the debate were often ingenuously combined to make primitive really took off, though, an 83.5 (old)carat stone (later equipment such as roclcing cradles. The energy was cut into a 47.69 ct pear shape called the Star of South provided by manual labor; horses and mules were Africa; figure 6) was offered for sale by the same Van only used for transport. Nielzerlz who had been associated with the first (Eureka) diamond. This was on March 17, 1869, in The First Dry Diggings. In late 1869 and in 1870, Hopetown (L. Hond letter cited ill Wealzley, 1869). however, diamonds were also found in places that Van Nielzerlz got the stone from a Griqua shepherd were nowhere near an obvious watercourse. They named Swartbooi, who said that he had found it on were recovered from reddish loamy surface sand and the Sandfontein farm, which was also near the con- from yellowish friable calcareous dry mud underlying vergence of the Orange and Vaal Rivers. Van Nielzerlz the sand. The yellowground was later found to gave Swartbooi all he possessed: 500 sheep, 10 head overlie harder, compact, bluish gray roclz-- of cattle, and one horse (F. Steytler letter dated March ground-which eventually was called . 18, 1869, cited in Robertson, 1974, pp. 173-174). Van Because they were far removed from any obvious Nielzerlz then sold the stone to Lilienfeld Brothers, streams or rivers and lacked water during the sum- general merchants in Hopetown, for £1,200. mer season, people referred to them as "dry" diggings This event removed all doubts in the minds of in contrast to the alluvial "river" or "wet" diggings. most people in , many of whom soon Most lay accounts of the history of the South took to searching the sands and gravels of the Orange African diamond fields (see, e.g., Dickinson, 1965) and Vaal Rivers. Because these early diggers knew lit- state that the and the tle about alluvial mining, the earliest efforts were were the first lzimberlite pipes discovered, but early inefficient, recovering only diamonds of one carat correspondence reveals that diamonds were recov- and larger. Hubner (1871)wrote that in 1870 the ear- liest sieves were made of pieces of corrugated iron -. .- . -- - - - Ill-house records of the Pniel Mission note the local find of a sheeting that had been pierced by nails to make diamond in 1859. Dunn (1871)mentioned the existence of an holes, so the smallest sieve size was one fifth of an 18th-century missionary's map that has the words "here be dia- inch (5 n~in).Consequently, only rough stones over monds" covering part of the Orange and Vaal River areas. Maps of this kind are not rare. The author has seen replicas of "mis- one carat (about 5 mm in longest dimension) were sionciry maps" with the words "here be diamonds" in Dutch or retained. A year later, metal screens in wooden Spanish for various parts of the world.

234 Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 ered first from the pipes at Dutoitspan and Bultfontein. In July 1870, the foreman of the Jagers- fontein farm, a man called De IUerlz, found a 50 ct diamond in a small dry creek on that property (Steytler, 18701.1have not found any early records on Koffiefontein. However, Beet (1931) states that the first diamond was found there by a transport rider (the equivalent of today's long-distance truck driver) named Banl, also in July 1870. Both finds were made in small tributaries of the Riet (Reed)River and were first considered river diggings. Yet, in a paper deliv- ered before the Geological Association in London in December 1872 (Paterson, 1873)) the statement is made that the Jagersfontein and Koffiefontein worlz- ings do not represent alluvial diggings, but rather they are similar to the Dutoitspan diggings, which by that time were already regarded as being other than river diggings. In fact, in a letter dated November 4, 1869, Fred Steytler wrote that during a visit to Dutoitspan farm the preceding month, he saw hundreds of garnets and some diamonds in limy soil (Robertson, 1974, p. 219). Not only is this several months before the first report of diamonds at Jagersfontein and Koffiefontein, but Figure 6. The 1869 discovery of the large dia- Steytler's association of red garnets and diamonds mond from which this 47.69 ct pear shape known as the Star of South Africa was cut sent suggests that early prospectors had an inkling that many people to the Orange and Vaal Rivers to the occurrence of garnets was in some way related to start digging for diamonds. Photo courtesy of the the occurrence of diamonds. Central Selling Organisation. Draper (1905)stated that the first diamonds not associated with a watercourse were actually found on Bultfontein farm sometime before November 1869. pebbles (which he had recognized as diamonds) from He claimed that he was present in a small store on Mrs. Van Wyk at Dutoitspan (Murray, 1873). the Vaal River on November 6, 1869, when Cornelius Duplooy walked in and showed him a few Discovery of the De Beers and Kimberley (the Big diamonds that he had found in the mud with which Hole) Pipes. These first two dry diggings (Bultfontein he built his house at Bultfontein. The mud came and Dutoitspan; Jagersfontein and Koffiefontein were from the edge of a large pan (i.e., a large shallow still considered wet diggings in 1870)did not generate depression) named Du Toit's Pan about 25 kin (16 much interest, both because the diamonds were miles) east of the Vaal River diggings. Further excava- small (Higson, 1870) and because living and digging tions revealed more diamonds in the small quarry conditions were not very pleasant on the hot, dry and also at a spot 500 in further north along the edge plains. Most would-be miners left for the Vaal River of the pan, on the neighboring farm owned by in January 1870. Summer was at its height, the water Adriaan van Wylz (called Dorstfontein, but once part had run out (Babe, 18721, and they had heard of the of the original Dutoitspan farm). These two mud Rolleston party's success in finding diamonds at quarries became the two famous diamond pipe Pniel. In May 1871, Richard Jackson and party left mines, Bultfontein and Dutoitspan (figure 7). the river diggings to check out a rumor and found a Another account states that the diggings on lone Boer named Corneilsa (probably Cornelissen, a Bultfontein started in September 1869 (report by F. S. common surname in Dutch) digging for diamonds in Philipson-Stow, cited in Robertson, 1974, p. 221). a depression on a farm adjoining Bultfontein and However, J. B. Robinson, a well-known early digger Dorstfontein (Dutoitspan)to the west. This farm- and diamond buyer, claimed that on his first trip to insightfully named Vooruitzigt ("Foresight," or the Vaal River at the end of 1868, he purchased some "Expectation")-belonged to two brothers, Johannes

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & CEMOLOCY Winter 1995 235 Nilzolaas and Diederilz Arnoldus De Beer. Because Gilfflan's Kop a week or two before Danion was told the diamonds at this dry digging were plentiful and to dig there (this story is first told in Beet, 1931). relatively large, the place was soon overrun by min- Gilfillfln's Kop was probably the only place for 11des ers in what came to be known as the De Beers Rush around De Beers Rush to have trees and shade for a pic- (Williams, 1905). nic, as depicted in a Mary Barber watercolor that is now Two months later, in mid-July 1871, diamonds in the Ihnberley mine museum. This diamond stayed were found at the foot of a low hill formed of porous in die Ortlepp family until recently, when it was placed calcareous rock, Gilf illan's Kop, which was 3.5 km (2 on permanent loan at the Africana Museum in miles) west of the De Beers Rush. Tills marked the (J. Hummel, pers. coinm., 1995). start of the De Beers New Rush and became the Big A large tent settlement grew up between Old De Hole (later the Kimberley mine). The credit for tills Beers and De Beers New Rush. On July 5, 1873, this discovery is usually given to the Rawstome party, settlement became the town of Kimberley. These originally from Colesberg, who were digging at the two dry diggings, together with Bultfontein and original (later "Old") De Beers Rush. One night when Dutoitspan, fit within a circle 3.5 lzm across. They the party's cook Damon was drunk and boisterous, developed into the four famous diamond mines locat- the other men sought to get rid of him by telling him ed on kiniberlite pipes in and around the town of to go and dig "on that hill over there." He did, and Ihmberley: the Kimberley (the ), De Beers, found a diamond. The hill was proclaimed a public Bultfontein, and Dutoitspan mines (again, see figure digging on July 21, 1871. It was subsequently 4). From the earliest days, they produced some spec- renamed Colesberg Kopje (Williams, 1905). tacular stones (figures 8 and 9). However, Sarah Ortlepp, wife of an Orange Free The dry diggings quickly became far more impor- State surveyor, claimed to have found the first stone by tant than the river diggings. Not only did they con- accident while picnicking in the shade of a tree on tain more diamonds per volume of ground being dug

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 surface [see, e.g., figure 11), with mules used to pro- vide the power. Water caused further problems; to pump it out, steam engines made their first appear- ance in 1875 [Williams, 1905).By 1878, fallen reef (the non-diamond-bearing rock that forms a wall around the pipe) became a very serious problem and cost much money to remove. To raise the necessary capital for mechanization of the mining operation and removal of the fallen reef, the smaller claims were consolidated into major new companies. By 1883, all of the diggings at the Kimberley mine were controlled by a few companies. The most important of these were the Kimberley Central Diamond Mining Company (controlled by Barnato Brothers) and the "French Company" (actually the Compagrue Franpise des Mines de Diamant d~iCap de Bonne Espkrance), which was run by the in Paris. By the end of 1882, the excavations were 120 Figure 8. The 55 ct Porter Rhodes diamond (named nl (400 feet) deep and underground mining had start- for the man on whose IZimberley mine claim it was found) was cut from a 154 ct stone considered to be the finest African diamond found up to 1880 Figwe 9. One of the most famous stones found at (Krashes, 1993). Photo courtesy of Harry Winston Inc. Dutoitspan is this 253.70 ct well-formed crystal known as the Oppenheimer diamond, which was recovered in 1964. Courtesy of the Sniithsonian Institution. up, but the fine-grained dry yellowground was n~~ich easier to process than the gravels. (Hard "blue- ground" had not yet been encountered.) Although as many as 20 other lumberlite pipes were found around Kimberley over the next 20 years, not until September 1890 was another economically successful lumberlite found-no more than 8 kin (5 miles) from the Kiinberley town center [Williams, 1905). First called the Premier, the name was changed to Wesselton when a larger pipe found in Transvaal in 1903 was also called the Premier.

Consolidation of Claims. In the early days of the dry diggings, individual miners were allowed to register one claim of 31 x 31 feet square. After 1872, when the pits on some claims became deeper than those on adjoining claims, and passageways between them started to fall in (figure lo), two claims were allowed to combine; in 1874, blocks of 10 claims were per- mitted. Eventually, the fnable yeLlowground ran out and gave way to hard, compact bluegro~ind,which was more difficult to work. Gradually, syndicates and small companies bought out the individual min- ers (Reunert, 1893). Around 1874, the open pits in the Kimberley mine had reached such depths (about 30-40 in) that mechanization was essential to haul the ore to the

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 23 7 ed; by 1884, almost all ore at Kimberley came from was considered the world center for economic lum- underground workings (Reunert, 1893). berlite pipe mines (C. Rhodes, quoted in De Beers The De Beers mine was 100 m deep in 1882 and Annual Report, 1896). The discovery of the first was experiencing the same problems as at Kimberley. Premier (later called Wesselton) pipe in September hi 1880, and his partners formed the De 1890, less than 8 lzm from Kin~berley,seemed to con- Beers Mmh~gCompany and began to consolidate all firm this view. Eventually, all five econon~icpipes claims on this pipe into a single entity. De Beers around Kimberley, plus the Jagersfontein and Mining's first technical manager was American min- Koffiefontein pipes in the , were ing engineer Gardner F. Williams, who had been either owned, leased, or gradually purchased by De manager of an alluvial gold mine near Oroville, Beers Consolidated Mines, which controlled tlie out- California, that had also produced a few hundred put of all economic diamond pipes in South Africa by small diamonds (K~inz,1885)! Williams (1886)wrote the turn of the century. (The purchase of all shares in the first detailed paper on the technical aspects of Koffiefontein was con~pletedin 1911.) operating tlie De Beers mine, which by 1884 had started underground workings. By 1887, all claim Discovery of the Premier Pipe. The Kiniberley area's blocks in the De Beers pipe had been bought up by dominance of diamond production in South Africa De Beers Mining. In the Kiinberley pipe, Rhodes's De changed in 1903 when the large Premier pipe was dis- Beers company first purchased the "French covered 30 kin east of , the capital of the Company" and then, in 1888, bought out Barnato Transvaal-500 lun northeast of Kimberley. Alluvial Brothers' "Kimberley Central" to form De Beers diamonds and a few small pipes had been found in the Consolidated Mines (Williams, 1905). By 1889, De general area as early as April 1897 (Molengraaff, 1897)' Beers had completed leasing arrangements for the but the Boer War (1899-1902) halted prospecting Dutoitspan and Bultfontein pipes. activities. By 1898, Thomas Cullinan, a builder and local brick manufacturer from Pretoria, had recog- Kiinberley-the World's Center for Economic nized that alluvial diamonds found on the Diamond Pipes. As the 19th century drew to a close, Bijenestpoort (Beehive Pass) farm came from the many other kiinberlite pipes were discovered in South adjoining farm to the east, Elandsfontein, A diamond Africa, but they either were not diamondiferous or was actually found right beneath the wires of were low in grade or small in volume. Furthermore, it Ehindsfontein's western fence (Heline, 1974). appeared that the closer the pipes were to Kimberley, Elandsfontein's owner, Prinsloo, would not sell and the bigger and better they were. Therefore, Kimberley threatened to shoot any diamond prospectors tres- passing on Ills farm. Nevertheless, in November 1902, after Prinsloo's death and the end of the Boer War, Figure 10. By 1872, as this early photo shows, the Cullinan was able to purchase the farm from walls between pits at the ~

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 199.5 vaal) Diamond Mining Company (Liddicoat, 1993; figure 12). Not until 1920 did the Premier's board of directors reach an understanding with De Beers on levels of production. In 1922, De Beers finally acquired all shares in the Premier mine ("De Beers issuing . . . ," 1923, p. 70). The Elandsfontein area continued to produce many important alluvial dia- monds, including the 726 ct Jonker and 287 ct Pohl diamonds, both found hi 1934.

Underground Mining. The Itimberley and De Beers mines became the first underground diamond-rnin- ing operations in 1882 and 1884, respectively, when workings reached depths of 120 m (400 feet). By the time the Kimberley mine was closed in 1914, it had been worked down to 1,098 m. The De Beers mine was closed in 1908; it was re-opened in 1963 as a modern underground mine, and was closed again in November 1990, when workings had reached 720 nl (De Beers Annzzal Report, 1990).A gradual transition from open-pit to underground mining took place in Figwe 11. As the 1~1iningclaims in the Kimberley the other three diamond pipe mines around area consolidated and pits got deeper, n~echaniza- tion was needed to bring the miners to the ore and Kin~berley-Bultfontein, Dutoitspan, and Wesselton transport the ore to the surface. Photo from (figure13) from 1906 to 1910, when depths from 120 Williams, 1905. to 150 in were reached. The was worked both open pit and underground until 1932, and then again as an widenings of a fissure), were known in the Orange underground mine from 1949 until 1971. The Free State (Molengraaff, 1895) and in the Cape west remained open pit until its clo- of Kimberley. From 1905 on, intermittent mining sure in 1931. It was re-opened as an open-pit mine in took place at Driekoppies (New Thor, Phoenix) and 1971, converted to an underground mine in 1977, Roberts Victor, New Eland, and Monastery (a small closed again in 1982, and re-opened in 1988; it is std pipe) in the Orange Free State, as well as at Frank active today (De Beers Annual Reports, 1971 to pre- Smith-Weltevreden, Sover-Mitjeniansluaal, Newlands, sent). The Premier mine (figure 14) closed in 1932, and Leicester (a small pipe) in the Cape. All these was re-opened as an underground mine in 1946, and mines were closed temporarily during the periods is still active. It is the source of many superb stones, 19 14115, 1921/22, 1932134, and 1940144 (see "History including the 426.50 carat piece of rough from which of Diamond Production," in Part JI) and for several the 128.25 ct D-flawless Niarchos was cut as well as periods during more recent times when demand for the 599 ct rough that produced the 273.85 ct D-inter- new mine production decreased. nally flawless Centenary diamond (figure 15). The In 1958, high-grade, good-quality fissures were Finsch mine started as an open-pit operation in 1966 found at Bellsbank/Bobbejaan, 80 lan northwest of and was converted to underground mining Kimberley. These have been successfully mined September 1990, after the pit reached a depth of 430 intermittently since then (figure 16). During the last nl (De Beers Annual Reports, 1 966 and 1990). decade, most of the fissure mines and small pipes Currently, the only operating underground &a- have been re-opened, with a combined (non-DeBeers) mend mines are in South Africa. All other diamond production that the author has calculated to be as pipe mines worldwide are open pit. high as 200,000 carats per year. Most of these are underground mines. Fissure Mines. As early as 1895, narrow fissures (actually dikes, but called fissures in South Africa)- The Lichtenburg Gravels. From the 1880s on, alluvial 50 cm to a few meters wide and several kilometers diamonds were found farther and farther upstream long-and related small pipes or "blows" (local from die original Vaal River diggings (Coe, 1904). By

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Fig~i~c12, This 11ec1&1ce, which has a 2.60 ct b1~1e diamond as its center stone, was (1 present from Premier mine Chairman Thomas C~~lfih~~nto 171s wiie, Annie, in celebra- tion of the gift o{ the CtzUinon dio~nondto King Edward VII of England in 1902. Co~~rtesyof S. H. Silver. Photo 0Harold d Erica Van Pelt

the ~LWIof the centuryl diggers had reached Bloemhof watercourses to connect them. Some people believe (again)see &re 4).During 1907-191 1) diamonds were that there is a lumberlite pipe beneath each hole (B. cliscovered in a thin layer of gravels well away from Von Gottberg) pers, comm.l 1982))but the consensus the northern bank of the river! on Mooifontein fcmn is that the holes are the remains of an old river sys- (Harger! 1911). In 1922) diamonds were found in gav- tein since eroded (seele.g.! Wilbamsl 1930). els on Sterldontein farm in the headwaters of the Mooi Each dia~nonddeposit on the plateau was River! a northern tributary of the Vaal ("The thrown open to the public by an organized llrush.J1A Sterkfontein diamond dqgmgs1" 1923). Transvaal governinent official stood on a cart and Thenl in February 1926) the first dian~ondswere read a proclamation declaring a farm! or part of itl found near Lichtenburg on the high) flat plateau that open for di

Diamond Sot~rcesin Africa: Part 1 Winter 1995 Mmes from 1904 to 1931. At the height of mining! in Ronaldson and J. van Praagh! who had bought the 1927) the gravels prod~lced2 million carats of dia- property/ invited the Consolid;~tedAfrican Selection monds. Although activity has dropped off drainatical- Trust (CAST)la diamond mining coinpany in the lyl the field is still worlzed sporadically, Gold Coast (now Ghana) to evaluate the deposit. CAST'S prospectorsl George and Ronald Derinodyl Coast. Diainonds were discovered in two brothers originally froin Ireland! submitted a coastal deposits/ actually dune valleys! near Luderitz favorable report (SelectionTrust in-house reports]. To in South (now Namibia) in April 1908 develop these deposits! the Cape Coast Exploration (figure 17; see below). In August 1925/ anlateur Company was incorporated in January 1928. CAST prospector Jaclz Carstens found the first dainond on originally obtained nearly a third of the shares! but the coast south of the Orange River! in South Africa! Anglo American and Barnato Brothers had bought near Port Nolloth (Reuning1 192gj Carstens! 1962). out everyone by January 1939 (Greenhalgh, 1985). The area was soon overrun by amateur prospectors as Systematic minmg started in 1929! was suspended in well as some professional geologistsl SLIC~Ias Hans 1932/ and res~unedi111937. The IUeinzee deposit was Merenslzy and Ernst Re~ining. inined out in 1958! hut adjoining deposits to the Merenslzy was famous for discovering the plat- north at Tweepad :1i1c1 Dreyerspan and to the south at in~~in-bearinghorizon that bears 111s name Annex IUeinzee are still being worlzed. (llMerei~slzyReef1') in Transvaal Province (Lehnlan! The Precious Stones Bill was rescinded in 1960. 1955]/ and Re~ii~inghad n111ch experience with the By then! Dc Beers had purchased allnost all the farms coastal diamond deposits in . In (and their mineral rights) along the Namaqualand Januaiy 1927) Merei~slzydiscovered the "oyster he1! coast from near Port Nolloth south to the mouth of in the Alexander Bay . He found that the dia- the Olifants River! a distance of 320 la(200 miles). inonds in this area are associated with a raised beach These areas were n~appedand prospccted in 19.58 and terrace (a terrace fonned when sea level was ligher 1959 (the author participated in these surveys as his than at present)! which also contained many oyster first job)/ and in the early 1960s several minable shells (Wagner and Merenslzyl 1928).He pegged his rescrves were outlined along the coast at Kohg~aas now-famous oyster line and formed the H. M. and Hondeklip Bay. Mmhg started at 1Coingnaas in Syndicate. 1978 ("Kougnaas alluvial diamond inine , . . 1978) The sudden increase in diamond production due and is still ongoing. De Beers and Transhex are to the Lichtenburg discoveriest combined with the ricl~nessof the Nainaqualand coastal depositsl caused the South African government to pass the Figure 13. Once cleptlis of 120-150 m were reached, Precio~isStones Bill in Novenlbcr 1927-forbidchng lninuig mnzpo~iiesat pipes Hie the Wesselton (sl~own f~irtl~erprospecting and digging for diamonds on here) had to go unclergrozzl~cl. state-owned land in (K~inz!1929). However! the H. M. Syndicate was awarded its dis- coveiy claims (a prospector who fhds a new pipe or alluvial deposit is awarded two claims)! and inining started h 1928. The remainder of the oyster line was talzen over by the South Afric'm government and pro- claimed the Alexander Bay State Alluvial Diggngs ("Government intends . . . /I1 1928).In 1930, the State Alluvial Diggings acquired all the cliscovery claims in the area! including those of the H. M. Syndicate. They were partly privatized in 1989 into the new Alexander Bay Development Corp. ('lAlexcorll)l whch has since been granted three sea concessions. Other important diamond deposits were discov- ered in 1926 at the mouth of the Buffels River at IUehee. They were also exempt from the prohibi- tions of the Precious Stones Billl because the area was a freehold property, Johannesburg jewelers G. S.

Diamond SOLI~CCSin Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Wintcr 1995 presently mining at Hondelzlip Bay. Minable reserves er diamonds from submerged beaches in tidal zone A! were also located at Langhoogte in 'ancient river ter- operating from the shore. Divers supported by long air races along the Buffels kverI the largest of the dry river hoses guide powerful suction devices that transport beds that are common along the Namaqualand coast. gravel and sand to the beach where they are washed Mmmg started there in 1978 and is still ongoing. and sorted. III zone B (shallow sea)! sinall boats are In 1966/ Baxter Brown and Hugh Jenner-Clarlze also usedl but such operatio~lsfrequently have to be were the first to discover ahvial diamond deposits in s~~spendedbecause of rough seas (G~irneyet al.! 19911. fossilized channels (earlier coLirsesl bends! or mean- ders that are now covered by terrace sands and gav- Discovexy of the Fhsch pipe. In 1963! De Beers pur- els of the present river bed) in the lower course of the chased a large pipe prospect from Alastair Fincham Orange River's south banlz (Wilsoi~~1972). These 'and Wilheh Schwabell who named their find Finsch deposits became the Ochta mine and Baken after the first three letters of their surnames. Beca~~se Dia~nante~which prod~icedlarge! good-qi~ality of the 1927 Precious Stones Billl the prospect was stones. Other fossilized channels have since been first pegged as an claim in 1958. When this fo~indon the north ball<. law was repealed in 19601 the prospectors started to worlz their claiin for diamonds and offered it to De Off-Shore Deposits. Texas oil Inan Sam Collins Beers. The latter deched the offer on the advice of forlneci the So~ithemDiainond Corporation in 1961 one of their geologistsl who had gotten uneconon~ic to prospect for and eventually mine diamonds from results from a bullz sample collected i11 one large deep the sea floor off the coast of Nainaq~al~md.De Beers pit. The prospectors then dug a long! shallow trench toolz over management of Southern Dia~nondin right across the pipe and found patches of high-grade 1964. Altho~~ghprospecting and research have con- lumberlite (a~ithor'sown files). De Beers later agreed tinued! there has as yet been no systematic mining to pay 4.5 mikon Rand (about US$4 nlillion) to pur- operation. chase this 17.9 ha (44 acre) pipe ("Finsch Diamonds The South African govemnleilt has dvided the (MY]Ltd. acq~liredby De Beersl'' 1963).Finscl~ came sea concessions into 14 blocksl further subdivided into production in 1966 and was officially opened into zones A [tidal)! B [sl~allow)~and C (deep as Febriiary 27! 1967. It soon produced 3 million carats dustrated in Gurney et al. (1991). Several junior min- per year. Finsch became an underground mine in ing coinpanies (notably Benguela Concessions) recov- September 1990)when a depth of 430 m was reached (figure 18).

Figure 14. The Premier mine, 11ere s110wn in (7n Discovery of the Venetia Pil~e.Altho~gh one wo~dd early-2Gth-cent~~ryphoto, was mined open pit ~~ntil thinlz that South Africa had been thoroughly it closed in 1936. Reopened iti 1946 0s an ~~nder- prospected over the years! a wholc new field of dia- ~OLLII~mining operaiio~~,it is stg being actively mondiferous kimberlites was recently discovered in worked. Pl~otocouItesy of De Beers. the northern Transvaal. In the mid-1970~~while prospecting for copper on the Venetia farml Saturn Mining (a s~lbsidiaryof the hglo Vaal group] and African Selection Tmst intersected a sinall luinber- lite fiss~lrein one drill hole (Selection Tmst in-house reports). De Beers acquired a lease from Saturn Mining to prospect for ki~nberlites~and in 197911980 De Beers geologists fo~lnd12 pipes. The Venetia nline1 on the largest of the pipes (12.7 ha (31 acre])! started production in 1991 and was officially opened August 14! 1992. It reached its planned production of 5 million carats per year in 1993! and is scheduled to produce this amount annually for the next 20 years.

Future Prospects. The discovery of the Venetia pipel which came more than 100 years after the original lmlzilnberlite discoveries around Ki~nberley~showed

242 Di:~monclSo~~rces in Africa: Pgrt I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 that newJ iinportant, ecoi~oinicpipes can still be found in South Africa. Diamondiferous fissures may still await discovery in the central part of the Orange Free State! the eastern and western Transvaal! and the areas. It is also possible that a large pipel covered by soil or calcrete! could be found in an area that is difficult to prospect. Th~is)althougl~ the co~mtryhas been prospected for a long tiinel there is still hope for new economic discoveries. LESOTHO (Formerly Basutoland) The first concession to prospect for diamonds in Basutoland (now Lesotl~o)was granted by the Basuto parainount chieftainess to Colonel Jaclz Scott in 1954 ("Colonel Jaclz Scott . . . 1978).Several lzimberlite occurrences were described in the first official report on the geology of Basutoland (Stoclzleyl 1947))b~it it was specifically stated that none had yet been found to contain diamonds. Figzzre 15. Many superb diamonds have rece~ztly come fron~the Pren~iermine, incl~~clingthe 599 ct In 19591 De Beers geologists joined Jaclz Scott's dia1710ndfro171 whic11 this 273,85 ct D-color (inter- prospectors two post-graduate st~~dents,Barry naLly fl~~wless)Ce~~ten~lty di~~lnond was c~lt.Photo Dawson and Peter NixonJ from the newly formed co~zrtesyof De ~ee~i. Researcll Institute for African Geology at the University of Leeds! England! where the first modern research on lzimberlites was started (Dawsoi~~1962; too smdl to sustain a substai~tialinining operation. Nixon et al.! 1963). De Beers withdrew in 1962! and However! in 1983 Transhex started a mine that is the I

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEIMOLOGY Wintcr 1995 ume (Wagner) 1914). S~~rfacemining continued ~intil . CDM headquarters moved froni World War I intervened. In 1915! the country was Ludentz to the new of Oranjeiiiund (Orange occ~lpiedby Soutli Africa and ownership of the mines mouth = 1110~1thof the Orange River) in 1943. In this was transferred to the Custodiai~of Eneiny Property. area! diaiiionds are found in sands and gravels of ancient 1ii:irine terraces. These occur up to 35 m Birth of CDM in 1919. After the war! Consolidated above present sea level and are covered by an overbw- Diamond Mines of South West Africa (CDM! created den of dune and beach sand as IIILIC~as 12-15 m thiclz specifically for this purpose by Emest Oppenheinier) (Hallainl 1964; M~lrrayet al.! 1970J.H~ige eaitli-inov- toolz overl reorganized! and purchased the properties of ing machinery is used to reinove the overb~lrden. the various Gerinan companies. (In 1917) Oppeiilieiiner had formed the Anglo American Offshore and Foreshore Mining. In the early 1960s) Corporation of So~itl~Africa [AAC] to raise venture the idea emerged that dianionds would also be foud capital for investment in the Witwatersrand gold in s~lb~nergedinarine terraces farther out to sea. hi iikes; AAC tmlz a large shareliolder position in CDM 19611 Sain Collins formed Marine Dian~ond in 1920.)Mining of the I~olmcmslzopaid Elizabeth Bay Corporation ("Diainonds mined off the seabedt'! areas res~imedthro~igli the 1920s and 1930~~but in 1962) and obtained a sea-mining concession. Maiine 1928 diamondifero~isniarine terraces (raised beaches) Diamond worlzed the sea floor near the coast froin were fo~~iidin the areas north of the ino~~tliof the October 1961 to J~lly1963! producing SllOOO carats. Orange River ("Another great diamond disco~ery~!~ However! ~lnpredictableweatlier) ro~igliseasl inade- 1928; I

Submarine Mining. Mter several years of research and prospecting actual sea-bed inining operations started in 1991 in Namibian waters as deep as 100 m, Altho~ighfirst-year prod~lctionwas modest-about 1251000 carats-by 1994 diainond prod~lctionfroin submarine deposits already accounted for 3 1% of Naniibials total prod~lction(De Beers Annual Reports for 1991 to 1994). These deposits are believed to extend to the edge of the coiitinental shelf (upto 100 lun froin the shore) in water over 100 m deep! so mining costs will be hgh. However! the quality of the diainonds recov-

GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 ered is exceptionally good and the deposits are huge (Gurney et al., 1991; Meyer, 1991).

New Mines. CDM has also opened two new mines on land in recent years: Elizabeth Bay, on the coast, 30 knl south of Luderitz; and Auchas, on the north bank of the Orange River, 45 km inland. Elizabeth Bay's ore reserves have been calculated at 38 million tonnes at 6.6 carats per 100 tonnes, that is, more than 2.5 million carats of good-quality small stones (Boting and Russel, 1993).The mine, started in June 1991, is projected to produce 250,000 carats annually Oaf, for 10 years. Alexander> Reserves at the Auchas mine are 12.3 million b Bay tonnes of ore (under 45 million tonnes of sandy over- burden), with 3.6 carats of diamond per 100 tonnes (Croll and Cooper, 1993). Plans are for the mine, started in July 1990, to produce 45,000 carats of good- quality, larger-than-average diamonds annually for 10 years.

CDM Becomes Namdeb. After intense negotiations, CDM was restructured in November 1994 as a new company, Naindeb Diamond Corporation. (Namdeb), Figure 17. This map shows the key areas where dia- owned in equal shares by De Beers Centenary and the monds are being mined in on-shore and off-shore Namibian government (see, e.g., "Namibia: The gov- deposits along ihe coasts of Namuquc;la11d(in South ernment is . . . ," 1995, and "Namibia: De Beers . . . ,'I Africa) and Namibia. The broken line above the 1995). Orange River in Namibia represents the outer bound- ary of the restricted diamond area. The inset shows the Kimberlites. The first kimberlite in Namibia was dis- outline of Namibia. covered at Gibeon Village in 1889. By 1906, several other occurrences had been identified as far as 50 lzm east of Gibeon, near Mukorob, and 85 km south of Gibeon, near Brukkaros (Scheibe, 1906). The site Early Discoveries. Although earlier finds of alluvial "near Bnilzkaros" where a 2.75 (old)ct diamond was diamonds had been rumored (Wayland, 1949), the allegedly found in 1893 could not be confirmed, and first officially recorded discoveiy~ofthree small &a- the lhberlites in the Gibeon field proved to be bar- mends (0.27, 0.14, and 0.02 ct)-was made in the ren (Janse, 1975). Namibia has at least four other Motloutse River near Foley in 1959, by a prospecting kimberlite fields, but all proved to be barren. party led by Humphrey Willis of CAST/Selection Trust (Boococlz, 1960, 1965).The diamonds could not BOTSWANA be traced to a host kimberlite; rather, they were (Formerly Bechuanaland) believed to come from an intermediate host, a con- Botswana is the second largest diamond producer by glomerate of the Ecca series (SelectionTrust in-house volume on the African continent, and the largest pro- report), and the company allowed their lease to lapse. ducer by total value in the world. Diamonds are recovered from two of the largest-laown lumberlite Discovery of Orapa. Most of central Botswana is cov- pipes-Orapa and Jwaneng-and one small one, ered by the , a vast expanse of red Letlhakane (figure 20). There is no production from sand dunes that lie in long rows separated by valleys alluvial sources. These lumberlite pipes were discov- covered in grass, bushes, and clumps of thorn trees, ered only relatively recently, because a large part of but no surface water. The De Beers subsidiary the country is covered by a thick layer of desert sand. Kimberlite Searches started prospecting in 1955 in

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 (figure 21). The De Beers prospecting teams (then called De Beers Prospecting Botswana) were directed by Dr. Gavin Lament, with Jim Gibson the regional team leader. The actual discovery of the Orapa pipe, however, was made by Manfred Marx, a junior geolo- gist ("Young prospector. . . ," 1969; "How the Orapa pipe was discovered," 1971).Marx said to me once that "everyone has one great piece of luck during their lifetime of prospecting, and I had mine in my very first job" (pers. comin., 1994). Orapa turned out to be a pipe topped by an oval- shaped crater 1,560 in x 950 m and about 80 in deep. At 106.6 ha (263 acre), it was the world's second largest economic lzimberlite (after the 146 ha of Tanzania's Mwadui pipe). Bechuanaland became the independent state of Botswana in 1966, and in 1969 De Beers Botswana Figure 18. The Finsch mine has been a major South Mining Company ()was registered in African diamond producer since it was opened in 1967. Mining went underground when the pit- to develop Orapa, originally as an 85/15 shown here in September 1990Ñha reached a joint venture of De Beers and the Botswana govem- depth of 430 m. inent. The Orapa mine started production in July 1971 and opened officially on May 26, 1972, with a planned production of 2.5 million carats per year the eastern (less sandy) parts of the country, and in ('Orapa opening . . . ," 1972; Alien, 1981).In 1975, 1965 they found two nondiamondiferous pipes near the joint venture was reorganized on a 50150 basis, Mochudi (Boocock, 1965). After 1960, they had also and the principals decided to double the size of the moved into the Motloutse River area, farther west Orapa operation. Orapa reached a peak production of than CAST had prospected. In April 1967, 12 years 6 million carats in 1991, and produced 5.4 million after they had started, they found a large diainondifer- carats in 1994 (De Beers Centenary Annual Reports ous lziinberlite pipe near a cattle post called Orapa for 1991-1994).

Figure 19. By building huge walls of sand to keep back the sea, CDM has mined vast tracts in Namibia that were once the I sea floor. Photo wur- Itesi of De Beers.

246 Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Discovery of Letlhalzane. The Orapa pipe is part of a field that contains 30 lu~ownlzi~nberlites. One year after Orapa was discovered! De Beers Prospecting fo~indtwo small pipes! Letlhalzane 1 and 2 (I1.6 and 3.6 hal re~pectively)~abo~it 48 lzm southeast of Orapa, These two pipes came into production in 1976 at a projected annual rate of 3001000 carats (Allen! 198ljj in 1994) they produced 1 ,l million carats (De Beers Cenlena~Annual RgporL for 19941.

Discovery of Jwaneng. After the successful discover- ies of Orapa and Letlhalzane) De Beers vei~t~ired south into the Icalahari Desert and in 1973 discov- ered the Jwaneng pipe. Eleven pipes were event~ially found 25-60 m under a cover of ICalahari sand. Jwaneng forms three lobes-soutl~J central! and northeast-with a con~binedarea of 54 ha (133 acre] Fime The'ze~7n1h1mk Ore the Orfipa Wane1x2fl1x-l Lctfi(~lmne. The bst of these, Llnder50 of sand. mgstarted in ,.lie centrall 27 ha lobe (figure 22) in February 1982! at a planned the Orapa pipe, was discovered only in 1967. The Gape 25 is std bekm ev annual production rate of 5 million carats (Chadwicl~~1983); in 1994/ Jwaneng produced 9 inil- lion carats. deposits. Today! the River Ranch n1ineJ a single pipe) Prospecting by Falconbridge and Others. In 1974) a appears to be econoinic. Beca~isethe geologic frame- Falcol~bridgeIS~iperiorOil joint venture began worlz of Zimbabwe favors lziinberlite intn~sions~it prospecting in Botswana c0111binhg inchcator-miner- has been the object of considerable prospecting activi- a1 sampling with aeroinagnetic surveys (which will ty fi~recent years. be dcscribed in detail in Part H). Over the next five years! they found approximately 60 lzimberlites Alluvial Deposits. H. R. Moir! wllo had dLlg dia- Linda 20-60 in of sand. Although one of these pipes! monds at Vaal River! was the first to discover alluvial the Gape 2SJ appeared to have p~teiltiallnone of diamonds in the Soinabula Forest area! in 1903 these lzimberlites has yet proved economic. (Mennelll 1906; Macgregorl 1921). By arrangeillents h 1982) superior Oil withdrew and Falconbridge illade in 1892 with the British Soutll Africa formed two joint ventures with De Beers: Gope Company (founded by Rl~odes)~De Beers had an ExplorationJ to develop Gope 25; and Debridge exclusive license to mine all mineralsf includq dia- ~xploration~to investigate other areas (Jonesl 1982). monds! in . Therefore! Moir contacted NO econon~icdiscoveries have been announced to prolnhent entrepreneur Sir James w&u&byl who date. formed the South African Options Syndicate and Since 1988) smaller coinpanies based in used his influence to obt~a diamond-111-g con- Australia) ) and SOU~~IAfrica have joined the cessi~ilfrom ~e Beers. mgoperations started in search for diamonds. As of 1994) at least 140 lumber- 1905 but seldom an~o~~ntedto more than a few 11~1n- lites in 11 clusters or fields were known. Except for &ed carats amuallyj they haUy ceased h 1938. Orapa) wlich outcrops (again! see figure 20))all other lzimberlites in Botswana lie under 20-100 in of sand. fimberfite Rps. The f&t lzimberlite pipel ~~~ossu~~ No new major discoveries have been announced thus was found in 1907)about 80 lzm soutl~westof wel lo far) but it is highly probable that at least one more (Memelll 1908J1but it W~IS than col~~sd-dy siguficant diamond pipe mine will be found. 900 by 150 in. Several sinaller pipes were later found nearby! but all provcd to be ine economic. ZIMBABWE De Beers geologists found inore lzin~berlitesin (Formerly ) the central part of the countiy in the late 1930~~but HistoricallyJZimbabwehasbeenasmallproducerof tl~eres~~ltswerenotei~couraging.I~ii~~berlite diamonds fro111 alluvial and minor lziinberlite Searches has prospected intermittently since the

Dia~no~~dSources in Africa: Part I Winter 1995 are less lilzely to occur here than in Botswana and South Africa (where the platfor~nsediments are still present! so the upper! wider parts of pipes and craters could still be preserved). Neverthelessl several Canadian and Australian companiesl as well as Kiinberlite Searches! are actively prospecting throughout the country ("Zimbabwe diamond hunt expands! " 1994). About 30 lzimberlites had been found in Zi~nbabweas of mid-1995. To date! only the River Ranch pipe h~sproved econoinic.

Figure 21. This aeri~lview sl~owsthe Or(1po lzin~berlite River Ranch Mine. The River Ranch Iu~nberlitepipe pipe sl~ortlyober its discovery 1i7 1967. Ujdilze most was found in 1975 by IG~nberliteSexcl~es~ but was lzimberlites, the ciscular outhe of the pipe (lower right reported to be uneconomic (De Beers hnzzdReport foregro~ind)can be seen at the s~zrface.Photo courtesy for 1977). The mineral rights were returned to the of Manfred luarx. state and were then acquired by a joint venture between A~iridiain(Australia based) and Redaurum (Canada 17ased). They started a miling operation in early 1950~~adding to the number of uneconomic 1992 with a planned annual production of 3001000 kiinberlites discovered. carats; as of the end of 1994) llowever, production Since 1992! l~owever~prospecting activities have was a little over 1501000 ct (Holloway and accelerated due to a change in the mining law and Associatesl 1995). Evidence for the presence of veiy the promise of continued political stability! COIII- large diamonds is provided by the finding of large bined with discoveries of diainondiferous pipes in fragments from diamonds brolzen during recovely. Canada's Arcllaean shield (an area of ancient granitic Fragments of one large stone added iip to 326 ct. The roclzsl i.e.] inore than 2!500 ii~illionyears old). Most plant has been inodifiecl to recover large stones-LIP of Zin~babweis also underlain by an Arcliaean shield! to 40 inill in longest dimension-intact ("F~~rther biit the overlying platform sedn~entshave been erod- evidence . . . 1994). The mine was officially ed froin n~~ichof it. Therefore! large pipes and craters opened November 2! 1995. ZAIRE Figure 22. Botswana's enor~nouslys~~ccess~~l jwaneng ope11-pit mine, here as it loolwxl in 1992, (Formerly the Belgian Congo) prod~zced9 inillion carats of diamonds in 1994. In recent years! Zaire has been the largest dia~nond Photo courtesy of De Beers. producer in Africa (and second in the world after A~istralia)by weight! nearly 70 million carats duing 199 1-1 994. Altl~oughmost of the diainonds are recovered froin sands and gravels along watersheds and hillsidesl the highly prodiictive Mbuji-Mayi area derives large quantities of poor-qiiality stones from sinall luinberlites. Howeverl the oudoolz for diainond inining in Zaire is currently uncertainl beca~lseof chaotic social and political conditions.

Earliest Discoveries, The earliest dian~ondfind was made 111 Deceinber 1903 111 Icatanga (now Shaba Province] by two tin prospectorsl CooI

Diamond So~~rcesin Atrica: Part I GEMS ik GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 in the Lualaba hver during 1906 to 1909 (Ball! 1912) were traced to two groups of diai~~ondifero~~s~but uneconon~ic~lumberlites along the eastem and west- ein rims of the I

Tshilzapa. Belgian prospector Narcisse Janot found the first diainoi1d4.1 ct-in the Tshilzapa area on Noveinber 4) 1907! in the Icasai River at Mai Mu~lei~e(Ball! 1912). He was a member of a field Fig~re23. Alihoz~ghsome zrneconor~iicpipes party led by American geologist M. K. Shaler! whch have bee11 fozzi~dalong t11e caster11 and western was prospecting for tlle newly formed Societk rims of the Kundel~inguPlateazz, the major dia- Internationale Forestiere et Miniere du Congo 1n011ddej~osits iz~ Zaire are in the region of the (Formii~ikre)~a joint venture between (first Icing towns of Tsl~ilzapamd Mbuji-Mayi. Leopold and then) the Societk Genkrale de Belgicl~~e and tlle American Gu~eid~ein~-ThoinasRyan gro~ip. The Tslulzapa area was inhabited by the fiercely European-organized inking ended abruptly in l96lJ independent Batshiolzo tribes! which resented the after independence was attained! and has never been intn~sionof foreigners/ so a detachment of soldiers resunled, Virt~~allyall n~iningis now done by localsl acconlpanied the prospecting party. One can visual- who produce several hundred thousa~~dcarats a year ize the conditions when Janot was panning for gold: from this area. It was raining hard! the ilatives were hostile! and he After 1967! the national governinent tried to con- had been away fro111 lloine for nearly half a year. trol the diamond ii~d~~stryin Westein Kasai by allow- When he fo~~ncisome color in his pan (a few speclzs of ing expatriate companies to set up buying offices. yellow g01d)~he quicldy put tlle concentrate! whch Nevertheless! even today prod~~ctionand trade still included a bright slliny crystal) in 21 bag that eventu- are not controlled by the central government. The ally ended up in Brussels with all the other samples. number of carats purchased at the official buying P, L~mcsweert~who inspected Janotls samplesl recog- offices rose froin a few tho~~sandin 1968 to close to nized the crystal as diamondl and ShalerJs accurate 6OO10O0 annually in the late 1980s and 1990s. field notes helped then1 locate the probable discovery site (Buttgenbacl~~1910; "How diainonds were dis- Mbuji-Mayi. The first diamonds at Busl~imaie(now covered . . . 1925).The find was confirmed by Janot called Mbuji-Mayi)were found in December 1918 by in 191 1) when ruffled tribal feelings had settled George Young! a young Scottish geologst worlzing down. Mining started in 1913! and the Tsl~ikapa for the Compagnie des Chemins de Fer du Bas-Congo deposits became a steacly producer of good-q~iality au Icatanga (Bk~elza)~a railway company that had small stoiles (Bardet! 1974).They are still active. been granted huge tracts of land for mineral explo- At Tshilzapa/ diamoilds are found ii~~~nconsoli- ration (P01inard~1929). Young found more than 81800 dated sands and gravels in and along the Icasai hver sn~alldiainonds in one location in a tributaiy of the and its trib~~taries-Tshilzapa/ Loi~gatsl~i~~~o~Bushiinaie River. The Socikte M.inikre ~LIBecklza was Tsiuinbel and Lubeinbe-which flow north from the formed in 1919) and mining started at once with Lunda region of Angola into the I

Dii~n~ondSo~irccs in Africa: Part I GEMS &. GEMOLOGY came from several small lzin~berlites~hscovered in Angola will undo~lbtedlybe an even greater player on 1946 (de Magnee! 1947). Their pipe steins are veiy the international marlzet. narsow and are topped by sinall craters that contain a complex n~ixtureof sandstonel lumberlitel clay! cal- Alluvial Fields. The discovery of diamonds in the cite! opall and chalcedony roclz and mineral fsagments. Tshilzapa area of what is now Zaire encouraged the Diamonds were fo~mdin eluvial (cl~ectlyoverlying the Guggenheim-Ryan group to extend prospecting far- lzimberlite] and colluvial (transported down slopeJ1as ther upstream into tlie Lunda area of Angola. In July well as alluvial deposits in the stream beds. 1912! Donald Steel found the first diamonds in tribu- The diamonds were generally of poor q~dty(95% taries of the Luembe River (Legrandl 1984).The bort)' but the grade was high (5 carats per tonne] and Companhia de Pesquisa h'lineiras em Angola (Peina) mining was low cost (Bardet) 1974).Consequentlyl large was fo~lndedin Lisbon in 1913 to mine the dialnonds quantities were producedl racka peak of 18 don (Castsol 1929). Productionl which started in 1916! carats in 1961. This enonnous production has made a rose gradually from 1001000carats in 1921 to nearly signhcant impact on the world diamond marlzet. 8001000carats in 1940. Bkcklza was reorganized after independence into a In 1917! Pema was reorganized into the new new Belgian company! Sibelza (Socikte dfInves- Companlia de Diainantes de Angola (Diama~g)~and tissements de Bkcelza! later Socikt6 dfEntreprises et fouyears later Diamang acquired prospecting rights to d'Investissements)l whch formed a subsidiary Mha virtually all of Angola (except the coastal strip) until (Societk merede Balcwanga) to manage the Mbuji- 1971. Bamato Brothers and Anglo American purchased Mayi mines. The Congolese (after l97Ot the Zairian) large share holdmgs in Diainang in 1923' and secured a government took a 50% eq~~ityin Miba; this was contract that

250 Diamond So~~rcesin Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Angola has a large illicit production (estimated at an additional one doncarats in 1992) that is largely ca~~sedby the recurrent den~obilizationof soldiers. Once released! the soldiers would rather dig for dia- monds than retum to their farms. Illicit production decreases when military operations talze place or heavy rains impede digging. A law passed in October 1994 gave Endiama the excl~~siveright to all diamond deposits in hgola and empowered it to enter into joint ventures with for- eign companies (with government approval). Licensed artisanal dggmg (manual diamond mining by local residents) is allowed in places where large- scale mmhg would not be lucrative. Present alluvial operations are carried out in the Lucapa area by ITL Mining (a s~lbsidiaryof RST) on behalf of the Sociedade Mineira de Lucapa! a joint venture of Endiama and SPE. Alluvial operations in the Cuango Valley! which stopped when Unita forces reinvaded the diamond worlu~~gsin November 1992! are starting up again. It is estimated that about 80% in of hgolan diamonds produced in 1980-1992 came Figure 24. Most of the diamonds fozmd to date Angola wme from allzzvid deposits h the Lz~capa from this area (Gordonl 1995). and Czz~7ngoareas,' in Lzznda Norte Provinc8. Kimberlites. There is only very limited production froin eluvial and colluvial gravels overlying pipes such All diamonds produced there to date came from all~l- as the one at Camaf~~ca-Camazombalwhich was vial deposits. The first diamonds were fo~~ndin 1914 found in 1952 in the Chicapa River near Caloi~da near Bria in the south central part of the country (Real! 1958). %s sinuous 3 lun-long bodyl up to 550 (Middleton! 1932). The major diamond-producing 111 widel covers an area of 75 ha (185 acres). Many are Camot-Berbkrati in C.A.R.Is wet ~0~1th- other chamondiferous lcimberlites were discovered in west and Moulza Ouadda in its dry northeast. the Lunda Norte district and elsewhere in Angola in Diamond production started in 1931. Mining was the 1970s (Jourdan! 1990, gives a total of 600). carried out by small French companies until indepen- Prospectmg activities by Diamang and E~~diamaindi- dence was attained in 19611after whcll syndicates of cated that at least five pipes in Lunda Norte may be locals assumed control. economic: CcamutuelCakepa! Cainatchia! Camagicq Since the early 1980~~foreign companies have and Catoca. However, hgo1a1s internal strife has hin- again been allowed to participate in mining ventures. dered evaluation and development of pipes throughout Osborne and Chappell Company attempted to dredge the country. The Russia-Salzha Diamond Corporation the Mambkrk River (the main trunlz river in the (Almazy Rossii-Sal~ha)~in a joint venture with Camot-Berbkrati region) during 1989-1 990) but the Endiama and Brazil-based Odebrecht) was reportedly project was terminated because the results could not pl- to develop the 66 ha Catoca pipe for open-pit support a large mechanized mining operation. mining. Development was delayed! tl~ough~as govem- Prospecting programs to evaluate the allegedly merit forces recaptured the Catoca area only in July extensive coll~~vialdeposits in the Ba~ningui- 1994 (Gordonl 1995). Bangoran area of the northeastern Moulza Ouadda De Beers is currently negotiating rights to region have been proposed since 1984. Canada-based prospect off-shore for submarine deposits and at sev- United Reef recently raised venture capital to evalu- eral areas on-shore (Gordonl 1995). ate this project (RoL~1994j1 and they started small- scale mining in June 1995. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC (C.A.R.) Official plus unofficial production in C.A.R. is The Central African Republic has been a small b~~testimated at 50OI000 carats a~m~~allyfor the last 33 steady prod~~cerof diamonds since the mid-1930s. years (based on Mining Annuul Revjew reports for

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 with bright pebbles on De Kallz farm to liigh-technol- ogy exploration and excavation of tons of desert sand at Orapa and Jwaneng. During this period, all but two of the largest economic kimberlite pipes ever discov- ered were found (the other two are in ). And several magnificent (see e.g., figure 25) were recovered. As a result, from 1872 to 1959, Africa produced 98% of the world's diamonds by weight, and 96% by value. Although, as will be dis- cussed in Part II, these percentages have dropped dra- matically in recent years, Africa is still the single most important diamond producer among the seven . Historically, most of the diamonds have been produced by alluvial diggings-along rivers and streams in South Africa, Angola, and Zaire, in partic- ular-and by large lzimberlite pipes, such as those clustered in the Kimberley area and the prolific pipes in Botswana. However, diamonds from coastal deposits, such as those off the Atlantic Coasts of Namibia and Namaqualand, promise to be the indus- try's greatest future resource. Part I1 will continue the story, focusing on the diamond-producing nations of eastern and western Africa. This part will also look at Africa's role in the development of theories on the geology and origin of Figure 25. The 128 ct fancy yellow Tiffanydiamond was diamond, as well as methods of diamond prospecting cut from one of the fabulous diamonds found in southern and mining. Special attention will be paid to the his- Africa, a 287 ct piece of rough reportedly recovered from a tory of diamond production in Africa and key devel- claim on the Kin~berleymine 111 1878. Photo by Josh opments from the 1870s to the present. Haskin; courtesy of Tiffany o) Co,

1961-1994). Despite careful prospecting, 110 lumber- Acknowledgments; The author [hanks Pat Sheahan htes or other primary host rocks have been found in of Konsult International Inc. in Toronto for assistance this region, and all of C.A.R.'s diamonds are recov- in collecting basic information and literature refer- ered from alluvial sources. ences; Roz Llavies of Creative Cartography in Perth for making the maps and last-minute alterations; Drs. CONCLUSION TO PART I John J. Gurney and Alfred A. Levinson for constnzc- The history of diamond and kimberlite discoveries in tive reviews, and Dr. Levinson especially for his Africa spans nearly 130 years, from children playing meticulous scrutiny of the maps and references.

REFERENCES Allen H.E.K. (1981) Development of Orapa and Letlhakane dia- Engineering journal, Vol. 40, Part 2 (November), pp. 573-574. mond mines, Botswana. Transactions of the Institution of Atherstone W.C. (18691The discovery of diamonds at the Cape of Mining and Metallurgy (Section A: Mining Industry), Vol. 90, Good Hope. Geological Magazine, Decade 1, Vol. 6, pp. October, pp. A1 77-A191. 208-213. The Angolan diamond deal (1923) South African Mining and Atkinson W.J., Smith C.B., Danchin R.V., fanse A.J.A. (1990) Engineering Journal, Vol. 34, Part 2, January 20 (p. 515) and Diamond deposits of Australia. In F.E. Hughes, Ed., Geology of February 3 (p.5751. the Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua, New Guinea, The Angolan diamond experrcncc: A case of wasted opport~~iiily Vol. 1, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, (1992)Diamond World Review, No. 71, pp. 44-59. Melbourne, Australia, pp. 69-76. Another great clicinionil discovery (1928) South African Mining and Babe J.L. (1872) The South African Diamond Fields. D. Weslcy &

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part 1 GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 Co., New York (reprinted in 1976 by the Historical Society, tifcre de Bakwanga (Kasai, Congo Belge). Bulletin de la Societi Kirnberley, South Africa), 105 pp. Belge de Geologic, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 97-108. Balfo~~r1. (1992) Famous Diamonds, 2nd ed. Gemological Institute Diamonds are trumps (1867)Cape Argus, April 18, p. 1; as reported of America, Santa Monica, CA, 245 pp. in Robertson, 1974, p. 43. Ball S.H. (1912) Diamonds in the Belgian Congo. Enguieering and Diamonds founil near Mlihash on the Lcbombo Range, cast of Mining journal, Vol. 93, No. 5 (February31, pp. 268-269. Swaziland (1895) South African Minirig jo~trnal,Vol. 4, January Ball S.H., Shaler M.K. (1914)Economic geology of the Belgian 12, pp. 299-300. Congo, Central Africa. Economic Geology, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. Diamonds mined off the sea bed (1962) Mining Magazine, Vol. 605463. 107, No. 1 (January),p. 40. Bardet M.G. (1974) Gdologie d~iDiamant, Vol. 2, Gisements de Diamond mining (1867) Colesberg Advertiser and Northern Dia~nantdlAfrique. Bureau de Recherches Gkologiques et Frontier Gnzelte, July 16, p. 1. Minikres (BRGM),Memoire 83, Paris, , 229 pp. Dickinson J.Y. (1965)The Book of Diamonds. Avencl Books, New Ba~ierM.H. (1896) Edelsteinkunde (Gemology).C.H. Tauchnitz, York. Leipzig, 71 1 pp. Draper D. (1905)The earliest discoveries of diamonds in the Cape Beet G. (1931) The Grand Old Days of the Diamond Fields: Colony and the Transvaal. Engineering and Mining Journal, Memories of Past Times with the Diggers of Diainondia. Vol. 79, pp. 612-613. Maskew Miller Ltd., Cape Town, South Africa, 192 pp. DLI~IIE.J. (1871)Notes on the Diamond-Fields. Saul Solomon &. Beet G., Tcipend T.L. (1917)The romance and reality of the Vaal Co., Cape Town, South Africa, 20 pp. diamond diggings. Diamond Fields Advertiser, Kimberlcy,. . Ecn Kaapschc diamant (A Cape diamond] (1867). . Hat VoU^sblad, South Africa,i 17pp. ~prL30. Boocock C, (1960), , Three small diamonds found in Barnanmato En~anuelH. I18651 Diamonds and Precious Stones. lohn Ciimclen Tribal Territory. In the Annual Report of the ~echuai'tciland Hotten, Lkcio;, 266 pp. Geological Survey Department for the Year 1960, Vol. 4. Fiisch Diamonds (MY)Ltd. acquired by De Beers (1963) Milling Boocock C. (1965) Mineral resources of the Bechumalancl Magazine, Vol. 108, No. 6 (Junc),p. 321. . Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources, Vol. 9, Further eviclence has been found of the presence of large diamonds No. 4, pp. 369417, at the River Ranch mine (1994) Engineering and Mining Borchers D., Stocken C.G., Dall A.E. (1970) Beach mining at journal, Vol. 195, No. 1, p. 14, Consolidated Diamond Mines of South West Africa Ltd.: Gerucht over eeii diamant gcvonden Lings de Oranjc Rivier Exploitation of the area between the high- and low-water [Rumor about a diamond found along the Orange River] (1867) marks, hi M.J. Jones, Ed., Mitiing and Technology, Het Volksblad, April 18. Vol. 1, Proceedings of the Ninth Commonwealth ~Vimingand Gordon C. (1995) Angola: A major produccr by 2000? Diamond Metailurgical Congress 1969, Institution of Mining and International, MayIJune, pp. 61-66. Metallurgy, London, pp. 571-590. Government intends to work the Alexander Bay deposits (1928) Boting G., Russel M. (1993) Elizabeth Bay mine: Reappraisal and Milling Magazine, Vol. 38, No, 2 (February),p. 134. commission of mining operations. In Abstracts of the Grasfontcin diamond nish (1927)Muting Magazine, Vol. 36, No. 4 Conference on Mining Investment in Namibia, Ministry of (April),p. 222. Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Namibici, pp. 83-88. Greenhalgh P. (1985) West African Diamonds 1919-1983: An Bruton E. (1978)Diamonds, 2nd cd. Chilton Book Co., Radnor, PA, Economic Histmy. Manchester University Press, Manchestcr, Buttgenbiich H. (1910)Description des Min6r;iux du Congo Beige. England, 306 pp. Annales du M~1s6edu Congo Belge, Gkologie, Paleontologic et Gregory J.R. (1868) Diamonds from the Cape of Good Hope. Ml~kralo&, S6rie I-Generalit&-Fascicule 1, pp. 5-10. Geological Magazine, Vol. 5, pp. 561-568. Buttgenbach (1925) Minkralogie du Congo Belge. Memoires de la Gurney J.J., Levinson A.A., Smith H.S. (1991) Marine mining of Socikte Royale des Sciences cle Liege. Seric 3, Vol. 13, pp. diamonds off the West Coast of Southern Africa. Gems di) 108-1 17. Gendogy, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 206-219. Captain Rolleston's party finds diamonds at Pniel (1870) Cape Hallam C.D. (1964)The geology of the constal diamond deposits of Argus, July 16. Southern Africa. In S.H. Haughton, Ed., The Geology of Some Carstens J, (1962)A Fortune Through My Fingers. Howard Ore Deposits in Southern Africa, Geological Society of South Timmins, Cape Town, South Africa, 185 pp. Africa, Johannesburg, pp. 671-728. Castro L. de (1929) Companhia de Diamantes de Angola. Harger H.S. (1911) The Bloemhof and Mooifontein diamond dig- Conipanhia de Diamantes de Angola, Lisbon, 50 pp. ging. South African A'limng ]oiiinal, Vol. 9, Part 2 November Chaclwiclz J.R. (1983) Jwaneng and Botswana: At height of dia- 18 (pp. 363-3641, November 25 (pp. 40 1402), and December 2 mond production. World Mum~g,January, pp. 64-68. (P. 4401. Clausscn P. (1841) Note sur Ie gisemcnt du cliamant dans 1c gres IHargraves E.H. (1851) Extract from printed papers relative to gco- rouge ancien. Bulletin de 1'Acadeinie Royala de Bruxelles, Vol. logical surveys, etc.: Further papers relative to the discovery of 8, No. 5, pp. 8-14. gold in Australia. Discoveiy of Gold, Aust.ralia, George E. Eyre Coe F.E. (1904) The diamond placers of the Vaal River, South and William Spottiswoodc, London. Africa. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Hawthorne J.B., Carrington A.J., Clement C.R., Skinner E.M.W. MetaU~ugy,Vol. 13, pp. 518-532. (1979) Geology of thc Dokolwayo hberlite and nssociateil Colonel Jack Scott finds first diamonds in Maluti Mountains, 1954 palaeo-alluvial deposits. In F.R. Boyd and H.O.A. Meyer, Eds., (1978)Indiaqua, No. 18, pp. 19-20. Kimberlites, Diatremes, and Diainoiid.~:Their Ceology, Croll A.M., Cooper G. (1993)Auchas n~c:Its discovery, its rnin- Petrology, and Geochemistry, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the ing and its future. In Abstracts of the Conference on Milling Second International Kimberlite Conference, American Investment in Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 59-70, Windhoek, Namibia, pp. 89-91. Helme N. (1974)Thomas Major CuUinan, a Biography. McGraw- Dawson J.B. (1962) Basutoland kimberlites. Bulletin of the Hill, Johanncsburg, South Africa, 271 pp. Geological Society of America, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 545-560. 1-Iigson G.S. (1870)Diamonds and gold at the Cape. lournal of the De Beers issuing new deferred shares to acquire all the shares of Society of Arts (London),Vol. 18, July 29, pp. 759-760. Premier (1923)~VulUng Magazine, Vol. 28, No. 2 (February),p. 70. Hollaway J. and Associates (1995)Zimbabwe. Mining Annual de Magnee I (1947) Prhence dc kimberlite dans la zone diaman- Review 1995, The Miniilg Journal, London, pp. 138-140.

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 253 How diamonds were discovered in the Belgian Congo (1925) Mining Annual Review 1995 (1995)The Mining Journal, London. Engineering and Mining Journal, Vol. 119, No. 2, p. 43. Molengraaff G.A.F. (1895) Uber ein Vorkommen von Diainanten How the Orapa pipe was discovered (1971) Diamond News and in dem Bebiete der kohlennjhrenden Formation bei Driekop im S.A. IeweUer, February, pp. 7-10. Oranjc-Freistaat (About the occurrence of diamonds in the area Hubner A. (1871) Geognostische Skizzen von den Sud- of the coal-bearing formation near Driekop in the Orange Free Afrikanischen Diamanten-Districten. Petermiinn State). Neues lahrbuch fin Mineralogie, Band 1894195, pp. (Geografische) Mitiheiliuigen, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 8 1-87. 277-283. Jacobs' diamond was not the first (1867)Colesberg Advertiser and Molengraaff G.A.F. (1897) Diamoncl at Rietfontein. Transactions Northern Frontier Gazette, June 4. of the Geological Society of South Africa, Vol. 3, pp. 122-123. Janse A.J.A. (1975)kmberlitc and related rocks from the Nama Molengraaff G.A.F. (1905)Thc Cullinan diamond. Transactions of Plateau of South-West Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the the Institute of Minmg Engineers, Vol. 24, pp. 507-509. Earth, Vol. 9, pp. 8 1-94. Murray L.G., Joynt R.H., O'Shea D.OfC.,Foster R.W., Kleinjan L. Jeffries D. (1750) A Treatise on Diamonds and Pearls. London. (1970)The geological environment of some diamond deposits Jones A. (1982)Falconbridge plans Dc Beers link for diamond off the coast of South West Africa, Report no. 70113. In F.M. search in Africa. Northern Miner, Vol. 68, No. 34 (October 281, Dclaney, Eel., The Geology of the East Atlantic Continental pp. 1, 19. Margin, Natural Environment Research Council, Institute of Jourdan P. (1990) The Minerals Industry of Angola. University of Geological Sciences, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, Zimbabwe Institute of Mining Research Report No. 116, pp. 9- pp. 119-141. 11. Murray R.W. (1873)The diamond-field keepsake for 1873. Saul Kaiser E. (1926) Die Diamantwijste SiidwestafriI

254 Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995 gold and dianionds in Minas Gerais. Materia Medica-Physico- Unpublished report, Bechuanaland Geological Survey Historio-Mechanics, Regno Mineral 1, Lon~lon,pp. 149-154. Department. Scheibe R. (1906)Der Blue Ground des Deutsch Slidwest Afrika Weakley J.R. (1869)The diamond discovery in South Africa (a col- in1 Vergleich mit dem des englischen Slid Afrikas (The blue lection of articles and original correspondence from various ground of compared to that of colonial journals and original remarks refuting erroneous state- Enghsh South Africa). Programni der konighchen Be1plcademie ments by H. Emanuel and J.R. Gregory]. Colesberg Advertiser, zu Berlin, FeistelJschen Buchdruckerei, Berlin, 18 pp. Colesberg, South Africa, 35 pp. Sheparcl C.U. (1846)On three new mineral species from Arkansas, Webster R. (1975) Gems: Their Sources, Descriptions and and the discovery of diamond in North Carolina. American Identification, 3rd ed. Butterworth & Co., London. fovmal of Science, 2nd ser., Vol. 22, pp. 249-254. Williams G.F. (1905) The Diamond Mines of South Africa. Sinkankas J. (1976) Gemstones of North America, Vol. 2. Van Macndan Co., New York. Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Williams A.F. (1930) Diamond bearing gravels of the Union of The Sterldontein diamond diggings (19231 South African Mining South Africa. In Proceedings of the Third (Triennial) Empire and Engineeringlowial, Vol. 35, No. 1648, pp. 152-153. Mining and Metallurgical Congress, South Africa, March 24- Steytler J.G. (1870)Letter, dated July 23, reporting the discovery of May 8, Part 3, Paper 2, 169 pp. diamonds on Jagersfontein. In The Emigrant's Guide, the Willianls A.F. (1932) The Genesis of the Diamond, Vols. 1-2. Diamond-Fields of South Africa, Saul Solomon, Cape Town, Ernest Berm, London, 636 pp. South Africa, p. 18. Williams G.F. (1886) The diamond mines of South Africa. Stockley G.M. (1947) Report on the Geology of Basutolancl. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, Government Printer, Maseru, Lesotho, 114 pp. Vol. 15, pp. 392417. Tennant J. (1870)South African diamonds. fournal of the Society Williams G.F. (19051 The Diamond Mines of South Africa, Vols. of Arts (London),Vol. 19, November 25, pp. 15-19. -2. B.F. Buck &. Co., New York. Twenty diamonds found so far along the banks of the Orange Wilson A.N. (1972)Spectacular finds in the Orange River terraces. River, see map (1868)Cape Argus, October 31. In A. N. Wilson, Diamond International No. 2, Diamond Wagner P.A. (1914)The Diamond Fields of Southern Africa. The International (Pty.)Ltd., Johannesburg, pp. 53-54. Transvaal Leader, Johannesburg, South Africa (reprinted in The wonderful South African diamond (1867) Colesberg 1971 by C. Struik, Cape Town, South Africa, 355 pp.). Advertiser and Northern Frontier Gazette, April 9. Wagner P.A., Merensky H. (19281 The diamond deposits on the Young prospector carved niche for himself in history (1969) coast of Little Namdqiialand. Transactions of the Geological Diamond News and S.A. leweUer, September, pp. 18-19. Society of South Africa, Vol. 31, pp. 1-41. Zimbabwe diamond hynt expands (1994)Diamond International, Wayland E.J. (1949)Minerals in the Bechuanaland Protectorate. No. 29, May/June, pp. 23-24. ,. , IN RESPONSE TO POPULAR DEMAND... 1

For more information or to enroll ddl(600) 421-7250 ext. 2% Outside the U.S. (3 10) 829-299 1 ext '2 Fax (3 10) 453-7674 SPECIAL I am hrn-At-mme i, [I INTRODUCTORY TUITION:

Diamond Sources in Africa: Part I GEMS & GEMOLOGY Winter 1995