Congressional Record—Senate S 8488
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
S 8488 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE June 15, 1995 required to carry out the event under this Whereas, when it appears that evidence ruary 22, 1992. I wanted to make it a resolution. under the control or in the possession of the matter of daily record precisely the SEC. 6. LIMITATION ON REPRESENTATIONS. Senate is needed for the promotion of jus- size of the Federal debt which as of The Boeing Company and the United Tech- tice, the Senate will take such action as will yesterday, Wednesday, June 14, stood promote the ends of justice consistent with nology Corporation shall not represent, ei- at $4,905,557,258,890.90 (or $18,621.58 for ther directly or indirectly, that this resolu- the privileges of the Senate; tion or any activity carried out under this Whereas, pursuant to section 703(a) and every man, woman, and child in Amer- resolution in any way constitutes approval 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government Act of ica). 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288B(A) and 288C(A)(2), the or endorsement by the Federal Government f of the Boeing Company or the United Tech- Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to re- nology Corporation or any product or service ``TAKE THE MONEY AND TALK'' offered by the Boeing Company or the United quests for testimony made to them in their Technology Corporation. official capacities: Now, therefore, be it Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, without a Resolved, That Ross Keys is authorized to f produce records and provide testimony in the doubt, the relationship between the cases of Schneider v. Schaaf and Schneider v. media and politicians is a unique and AUTHORIZING REPRESENTATION interesting one. All would agree that BY SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL Messer, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted. press attention on politicians is a natu- AND TESTIMONY BY FORMER SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is author- ral function of journalistic coverage of SENATE EMPLOYEE ized to represent Ross Keys in connection the legislative process. It is a nec- Mr. CHAFEE. Mr. President, I ask with the testimony authorized by section 1 essary and useful role for the members unanimous consent that the Senate of this resolution. of the press. f proceed to the immediate consider- Over the years, there has been a lot ation of Senate Resolution 135, submit- CLOTURE MOTION of media coverage focused on the ef- ted earlier today by Senators DOLE and Mr. CHAFEE. Mr. President, I send a fects of special interests on the legisla- DASCHLE. tive process. Reams have been written The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion to the desk that is signed by 16 Senators. on how the wishes of the American peo- clerk will report. ple are compromised by the practice of The legislative clerk read as follows: The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. legislators accepting gratuities from A resolution (S. Res. 135) to authorize pro- the pockets of highly paid lobbyists. duction of documents and testimony by a The legislative clerk read as follows: former Senate employee, and representation CLOTURE MOTION Miles of video tape have been aired on by Senate legal counsel. We, the undersigned Senators, in accord- programs critical of Members of Con- gress who cavort with special interest The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there ance with the provisions of rule XXII of groups which have influence over mat- objection to the immediate consider- Standing Rules of the Senate, hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to ters under consideration by Congress. ation of the resolution? proceed to Calendar Number 114, S. 440, the Often, by focusing their investigative There being no objection, the Senate National Highway System bill, signed by 16 proceeded to consider the resolution. light on elected officials, the media Senators. have brought instances of unethical be- Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, the plain- Bob Dole, Lauch Faircloth, Larry Pres- tiffs in two civil actions pending in sler, Rod Grams, Don Nickles, Robert havior to the public's attention. North Dakota State court have re- F. Bennett, Craig Thomas, James M. Partly as a result of this attention, quested documents and testimony from Inhofe, Pete V. Domenici, John W. Members of Congress got the message. a former member of Senator CONRAD's Warner, Hank Brown, John Chafee, In an effort, which I led here some staff relating to constituent casework Christopher Bond, Kay Bailey years ago, to eliminate possible con- Hutchison, Bob Smith, and Dirk flicts of interest and perceptions of the staff member performed for the Kempthorne. plaintiffs. The following resolution such conflicts, Members chose to pro- would authorize the former staff mem- f hibit the acceptance of honoraria and ber to testify at a deposition with rep- MORNING BUSINESS to require public disclosure of gifts from outside groups. Now, because of resentation by the Senate Legal Coun- (During today's session of the Sen- reporting requirements, the American sel, and would authorize the production ate, the following morning business people are able to judge the effects that of documents. was transacted.) Mr. CHAFEE. Mr. President, I ask any undue influence lobbyists may unanimous consent that the resolution f have on their elected representatives. be considered and agreed to, that the WAS CONGRESS IRRESPONSIBLE? What is distressing to me is the lack preamble be agreed to, that the motion THE VOTERS HAVE SAID YES of parity that exists in this area as far to reconsider be laid upon the table, Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, on that as the media are concerned. In the and that any statements relating to memorable evening in 1972 when I June 1995 edition of the American the resolution appear at the appro- learned that I had been elected to the Journalism Review, Alicia C. Shepard, priate place in the RECORD. Senate in 1972, one of the commitments in an article entitled, ``Take the Money The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without I made to myself was that I would and Talk,'' makes a compelling argu- objection, it is so ordered. ment for members of the press to turn So the resolution (S. Res. 135) was never fail to see a young person, or a group of young people, who wanted to the light of honoraria disclosure on agreed to. themselves. As the article points out, The preamble was agreed to. see me. It certainly proved beneficial to me journalists who receive honoraria from The resolution, with its preamble, is the very groups they cover have be- as follows: because I've been inspired by the esti- mated 60,000 young people with whom come a matter of considerable concern. S. RES. 135 I've visited during the nearly 23 years It seems that even many reporters feel Whereas, the plaintiffs in Schneider v. uncomfortable with the large sums Schaaf, Civ. No. 95±C±1056 and Schneider v. I've been in the Senate. Most of them have been concerned that their peers receive from speaking Messer, Civ. No. 93±C±124, civil actions pend- engagements. ing in state court in North Dakota have about the magnitude of the Federal sought the deposition testimony of Ross debt that Congress has run up for the In this age of instant communica- Keys, a former Senate employee who worked coming generations to pay. The young tion, no one can doubt the tremendous for Senator Kent Conrad and documents people and I always discuss the fact impact of the media. Their storiesÐei- from Senator Conrad's office; that under the U.S. Constitution, no ther in print, through newspapers and Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of President can spend a dime of Federal magazines, or on the air waves, the United States and Rule XI of the Stand- through network news and talk radioÐ ing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under money that has not first been author- the control or in the possession of the Senate ized and appropriated by both the control the very way the public re- can, by administrative or judicial process, be House and Senate of the United States. ceives the news each day and perceives taken from such control or possession but by That's why I began making these the issues and the players in the cov- permission of the Senate; daily reports to the Senate on Feb- erage. Reporters have the ability to June 15, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE S 8489 frame a story through virtually any fil- which I have referred be printed in the Roberts' ABC colleague Jeff Greenfield, ter they choose. Theirs is a powerful RECORD. who also speaks for money, doesn't think it's tool that cannot be taken lightly. There being no objection, the article a good idea to duck the issue. ``I think we was ordered to be printed in the ought not not talk about it,'' he says. ``I At a time when public cynicism with mean that's Cokie's right, obviously,'' he both politicians and the media seems RECORD, as follows: adds, but ``if we want people to answer our to have reached new proportions, the [From the American Journalism Review, questions, then up to a reasonable point, we journalism profession ought to put the June 1995] should answer their questions.'' brakes on and reflect on how it is TAKE THE MONEY AND TALK The phenomenon of journalists giving speeches for staggering sums of money con- tainted by the policy of accepting (By Alicia C. Shepard) tinues to dog the profession. Chicago Trib- speaking fees. How is one to know if a It's speech time at the Broward County une Washington Bureau Chief James Warren given journalist has a private agenda Convention Center in Fort Lauderdale.