Peter Jennings Still the No. 1 News Anchorman but Tom Brokaw Now in Virtual Tie for First Place

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peter Jennings Still the No. 1 News Anchorman but Tom Brokaw Now in Virtual Tie for First Place The Harris Poll THE HARRIS POLL 1994 #16 For release: Monday, March 14, 1994 PETER JENNINGS STILL THE NO. 1 NEWS ANCHORMAN BUT TOM BROKAW NOW IN VIRTUAL TIE FOR FIRST PLACE By Humphrey Taylor The battle to be the nation's most popular TV news anchorman is now a virtual dead heat between Peter Jennings of ABC and Tom Brokaw of NBC. In 1992 and 1993, Peter Jennings was the clear favorite. In this latest Harris Poll, he has slipped a little and Tom Brokaw has increased his following. Dan Rather of CBS is in third place, but is strongly positioned to challenge the front runners if either were to slip. L These are the results of a Harris Poll of 1,252 adults surveyed between Feb. 2 and 6, 1994. In 1992 and 1993 Harris Polls, Peter Jennings was clearly the most popular anchor, eleven points (in 1992) and eight points (in 1993) ahead of his nearest rival. In those years, Brokaw and Rather were in a virtual tie for second place. Now 30 percent of all adults prefer Peter Jennings, 29 percent prefer Tom Brokaw and 24 percent prefer Dan Rather. Support for Bernard Shaw of CNN, which was always a long way behind that of the three network anchors, has slipped slightly. Only 10 percent of adults prefer him to the other three anchors, compared to 13 percent in 1992 and 12 percent in 1993. L Louis Harris & Associates 630 Fifth Avenue NYC Political Bias in Network News Another question in the poll concerns political bias in the news broadcasts or the major networks. The great majority of the public (70 percent) do not believe that network news programs are biased toward either the Republicans or Democrats. However, among the small minority who feel they are biased there is a tendency to see a pro-Democratic tilt. Only 7 percent see a pro-Republican bias, while 18 percent see a pro-Democratic tilt. Of course, bias, like beauty, is often in the eye of the beholder and public perceptions depend on what the public believes to "be fair and balanced." Given the tendency of many of the media to cast themselves as watchdogs (i.e., critics) of those in power, these results may reflect the shadow of twelve years of Republican administrations. If so, this perceived tilt may change over the next two years as media watchdogs critique a Democratic administration and a Democratic Congress. Humphrey Taylor is the President and CEO of Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. Note: Connie Chung was not included in this survey. We felt it would be unfair to include her until she has been on the job (as Co-Anchor) longer. TABLE 1 PREFERRED ANCHORMAN 'Of the four news anchormen (READ LIST), which one do you prefer?" Peter Jennings of ABC Tom Brokaw of NBC Dan Rather of CBS Bernard Shaw of CNN NoneINot sure TABLE 2 TV NEWS BIAS "In general, do you feel that the network news programs tend to be biased toward the Democrats, biased toward the Republicans or pretty fair?" Total Republican Democrat Independent 1993 1994 1993 1994 1993 1994 1993 1994 % % % % % % % % Biased toward Democrats 2 1 18 39 32 10 8 19 17 Biased toward Republicans 6 7 6 5 6 8 4 6 Pretty fair 70 70 53 60 79 79 74 71 Not sure 4 5 2 3 4 5 3 6 METHODOLOGY This Harris Poll was conducted by telephone within the United States between Feb.2 and 6, among a nationwide cross section of 1,252 adults. Figures for age, sex, race, education and number of adults in the household were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. In theory, with a sample of this size, one can say with 95 percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult population had been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (non- response), question wording and question order, interviewer bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g., for likely voters). It is difficult or impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors. This statement conforms to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls. Contact Louis Harris and Associates, Inc., Information Services, 630 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 1011 1, (212) 698-9697, for complete demographic details for the questions in this release. COPYFUGHT 1994 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC. ISSN 0895-7983 .
Recommended publications
  • Ext Generatio
    MAY24 The News MEDIA nuo11011 .....,1 US West, Time Warner: telco-cable convergence 6 JOURNALISM Rather, Chung: The return of the anchor team PROGRAMING GE Chairman Welch pledges support to NBC affiliates 26 U N!'K; Vol. 123 No.21 62nd Year 1993 $2.95 A Cahners Publication OP Progr : ing the no^o/71G,*******************3-DIGIT APR94 554 00237 ext generatio BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 Air .. .r,. = . ,,, aju+0141.0110 m,.., SHOWCASE H80 is a re9KSered trademark of None Box ice Inc. P 1593 Warner Bros. Inc. M ROW Reserve 5H:.. WGAS E ALE DEMOS. MEN 18 -49 MEN 18 -49 AUDIENCE AUDIENCE PROGRAM COMPOSITION PROGRAM COMPOSITION STAR TREK: DEEP SPACE 9 37% WKRP IN CINCINNATI 25% HBO COMEDY SHOWCASE 35% IT'S SHOWTIME AT APOLLO 24% SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE 35% SOUL TRAIN 24% G. MICHAEL SPORTS MACHINE 34% BAYWATCH 24% WHOOP! WEEKEND 31% PRIME SUSPECT 24% UPTOWN COMEDY CLUB 31% CURRENT AFFAIR EXTRA 23% COMIC STRIP LIVE 31% STREET JUSTICE 23% APOLLO COMEDY HOUR 310/0 EBONY JET SHOWCASE 23% HIGHLANDER 30% WARRIORS 23% AMERICAN GLADIATORS 28% CATWALK 23% RENEGADE 28% ED SULLIVAN SHOW 23% ROGGIN'S HEROES 28% RUNAWAY RICH & FAMOUS 22% ON SCENE 27% HOLLYWOOD BABYLON 22% EMERGENCY CALL 26% SWEATING BULLETS 21% UNTOUCHABLES 26% HARRY & THE HENDERSONS 21% KIDS IN THE HALL 26% ARSENIO WEEKEND JAM 20% ABC'S IN CONCERT 26% STAR SEARCH 20% WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF THAT 26% ENTERTAINMENT THIS WEEK 20% SISKEL & EBERT 25% LIFESTYLES OF RICH & FAMOUS 19% FIREFIGHTERS 25% WHEEL OF FORTUNE - WEEKEND 10% SOURCE. NTI, FEBRUARY NAD DATES In today's tough marketplace, no one has money to burn.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2007 Impact Report
    INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S MEDIA FOUNDATION The Global Network for Women in the News Media 2006–2007 Annual Report From the IWMF Executive Director and Co-Chairs March 2008 Dear Friends and Supporters, As a global network the IWMF supports women journalists throughout the world by honoring their courage, cultivating their leadership skills, and joining with them to pioneer change in the news media. Our global commitment is reflected in the activities documented in this annual report. In 2006-2007 we celebrated the bravery of Courage in Journalism honorees from China, the United States, Lebanon and Mexico. We sponsored an Iraqi journalist on a fellowship that placed her in newsrooms with American counterparts in Boston and New York City. In the summer we convened journalists and top media managers from 14 African countries in Johannesburg to examine best practices for increasing and improving reporting on HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria. On the other side of the world in Chicago we simultaneously operated our annual Leadership Institute for Women Journalists, training mid-career journlists in skills needed to advance in the newsroom. These initiatives were carried out in the belief that strong participation by women in the news media is a crucial part of creating and maintaining freedom of the press. Because our mission is as relevant as ever, we also prepared for the future. We welcomed a cohort of new international members to the IWMF’s governing board. We geared up for the launch of leadership training for women journalists from former Soviet republics. And we added a major new journalism training inititiative on agriculture and women in Africa to our agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Stereotypes of Asians and Asian Americans in the U.S. Media
    ABSTRACT Stereotypes of Asians and Asian Americans in the U.S. Media: Appearance, Disappearance, and Assimilation Yueqin Yang, M.A. Mentor: Douglas R. Ferdon, Jr., Ph.D. This thesis commits to highlighting major stereotypes concerning Asians and Asian Americans found in the U.S. media, the “Yellow Peril,” the perpetual foreigner, the model minority, and problematic representations of gender and sexuality. In the U.S. media, Asians and Asian Americans are greatly underrepresented. Acting roles that are granted to them in television series, films, and shows usually consist of stereotyped characters. It is unacceptable to socialize such stereotypes, for the media play a significant role of education and social networking which help people understand themselves and their relation with others. Within the limited pages of the thesis, I devote to exploring such labels as the “Yellow Peril,” perpetual foreigner, the model minority, the emasculated Asian male and the hyper-sexualized Asian female in the U.S. media. In doing so I hope to promote awareness of such typecasts by white dominant culture and society to ethnic minorities in the U.S. Stereotypes of Asians and Asian Americans in the U.S. Media: Appearance, Disappearance, and Assimilation by Yueqin Yang, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of American Studies ___________________________________ Douglas R. Ferdon, Jr., Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ Douglas R. Ferdon, Jr., Ph.D., Chairperson ___________________________________ James M. SoRelle, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Xin Wang, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time
    The Business of Getting “The Get”: Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time by Connie Chung The Joan Shorenstein Center I PRESS POLITICS Discussion Paper D-28 April 1998 IIPUBLIC POLICY Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government The Business of Getting “The Get” Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time by Connie Chung Discussion Paper D-28 April 1998 INTRODUCTION In “The Business of Getting ‘The Get’,” TV to recover a sense of lost balance and integrity news veteran Connie Chung has given us a dra- that appears to trouble as many news profes- matic—and powerfully informative—insider’s sionals as it does, and, to judge by polls, the account of a driving, indeed sometimes defining, American news audience. force in modern television news: the celebrity One may agree or disagree with all or part interview. of her conclusion; what is not disputable is that The celebrity may be well established or Chung has provided us in this paper with a an overnight sensation; the distinction barely nuanced and provocatively insightful view into matters in the relentless hunger of a Nielsen- the world of journalism at the end of the 20th driven industry that many charge has too often century, and one of the main pressures which in recent years crossed over the line between drive it as a commercial medium, whether print “news” and “entertainment.” or broadcast. One may lament the world it Chung focuses her study on how, in early reveals; one may appreciate the frankness with 1997, retired Army Sergeant Major Brenda which it is portrayed; one may embrace or reject Hoster came to accuse the Army’s top enlisted the conclusions and recommendations Chung man, Sergeant Major Gene McKinney—and the has given us.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Intelligence!
    NEW YORK INTELLIGENCE! TIME/ LIFE ROB PETER 50 `Assassins' Probe Media Monitor: Gets Prime Time Quick Takes The "unanswered" ques- • Bob Schieffer, the CBS fions in the assassinations of White House correspondent, John F. Kennedy, Robert grew up in the shadow of Kennedy, Martin Luther King his brother Tom, who serves Jr., and the attempted assas- in the Texas legislature. That sination of George Wallace used to bother Bob, but no will be examined in a CBS more—thanks to Bill Small, News report that may pre- the CBS News executive who empt most of the network's assigned him to the White nighttime schedule on No- House. As Bob Schieffer puts vember 20. According to Les it, "I used to be Tom Schief- Midgley, executive producer fer's brother, but Bill Small of "The Assassins," what is gave me my own identity. currently being checked out Now I'm Dan Rather's re- includes: placement." Brother Tom is • The possibility of a a man with a sense of hu- "second Oswald" firing at mor, too. He recently per- Bouton as Maverick: Will television get a hit off him? J.F.K., as well as the first suaded a waitress in Vail, Oswald's CIA connections. Colorado, where the presi- Winding Up for a TV Pitch: • The discrepancies in the dent was vacationing, to go R.F.K. shooting account, up to Bob and ask, "Haven't Hometown Boy's New Stuff such as the powder burns on I seen you on TV?" Bob said Jim Bouton says he isn't just collecting material for an- Kennedy vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Journalist Research Project
    Famous Journalist Research Project Name:____________________________ The Assignment: You will research a famous journalist and present to the class your findings. You will introduce the ​ journalist, describe his/her major accomplishments, why he/she is famous, how he/she got his/her start in journalism, pertinent personal information, and be able answer any questions from the journalism class. You should make yourself an "expert" on this person. You should know more about the person than you actually present. You will need to gather your information from a wide variety of sources: Internet, TV, magazines, newspapers, etc. You must include a list of all sources you consult. For modern day journalists, you MUST read/watch something they have done. (ie. If you were presenting on Barbara Walters, then you must actually watch at least one interview/story she has done, or a portion of one, if an entire story isn't available. If you choose a writer, then you must read at least ONE article written by that person.) Source Ideas: Biography.com, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN or any news websites. NO WIKIPEDIA! The Presentation: You may be as creative as you wish to be. You may use note cards or you may memorize your ​ presentation. You must have at least ONE visual!! Any visual must include information as well as be creative. Some possibilities include dressing as the character (if they have a distinctive way of dressing) & performing in first person (imitating the journalist), creating a video, PowerPoint or make a poster of the journalist’s life, a photo album, a smore, or something else! The main idea: Be creative as well as informative.
    [Show full text]
  • By Barrie Dunsmor E PRESS POLITICS PUBLIC POLICY
    THE NEXT WAR: LIVE? by Barrie Dunsmor e The Joan Shorenstein Center PRESS POLITICS Discussion Paper D-22 March 1996 PUBLIC POLICY Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government Barrie Dunsmore 35 INTRODUCTION “Live” coverage is no longer a technological recognition that their effort, while sincere and marvel, though networks still rush to superim- determined, may fail. And so they “negotiate.” pose the word “live” over their coverage of a They say they respect each other’s needs. They Presidential news conference, a Congressional are sensitive to the awesome power of public hearing or the latest installment of the O.J. opinion in the age of television, faxes, cellular Simpson saga. Indeed, “live” coverage has been phones and other such miracles of communica- an option, though at the beginning an awkward tion. They are aware that any agreement and costly one, since the political conventions of reached in an atmosphere of peace may quickly 1948 and 1952. Over the years, as cameras have collapse in the pressures of war. become smaller, satellites more sophisticated, Neither side has to be reminded that the and the world more “digitalized,” costs have precedent for “live” coverage of war has been set. dropped dramatically, and many news events are Twice already, during the Persian Gulf War of now covered “live” routinely—except for the 1990-91, network correspondents reported “live” coverage of war. Yet, even here, too, it seems to from the Kuwaiti front—Forrest Sawyer for ABC be only a matter of time before anchors intro- News and Bob McKeowan for CBS News.
    [Show full text]
  • J366E HISTORY of JOURNALISM University of Texas School of Journalism Fall Semester 2010
    J366E HISTORY OF JOURNALISM University of Texas School of Journalism Fall Semester 2010 Instructor: Dr. Tom Johnson Office: CMA 5.155 Phone: 232-3831 email: [email protected] Office Hours: TTH 1-3:30, by appointment and when you least expect it Class Time: 3:30-5 Tuesday and Thursday, CMA 5.136 REQUIRED READINGS Wm David Sloan, The Media in America: A History (7th Edition). Reading packet: available on library reserve website (see separate sheet for instructions) COURSE DESCRIPTION Development of the mass media; social, economic, and political factors that have contributed to changes in the press. Three lecture hours a week for one semester. Prerequisite: Upper-division standing and a major in journalism, or consent of instructor. OBJECTIVES J 366E will trace the development of American media with an emphasis on cultural, technological and economic backgrounds of press development. To put it more simply, this course will examine the historic relationship between American society and the media. An underlying assumption of this class is that the content and values of the media have been greatly influenced by changes in society over the last 300 years. Conversely, the media have helped shape our society. More specifically, this course will: 1. Examine how journalistic values such as objectivity have evolved. 2. Explain how the media influenced society and how society influenced the media during different periods of our nation's history. 3. Examine who controlled the media at different periods of time, how that control was exercised and how that control influenced media content. 4. Investigate the relationship between the public and the media during different periods of time.
    [Show full text]
  • 54Th Annual Commencement 54TH
    54th Annual Commencement 54TH Brilliant Future Juris Doctor Degrees MAY 11 Doctor of Medicine Degrees JUNE 1 Master of Fine Arts and Doctoral Degrees JUNE 15 Master’s and Baccalaureate Degrees JUNE 14, 15, 16, 17 Table of Contents 2019 Commencement Schedule of Ceremonies . 3 Chancellor’s Award of Distinction . 4 Message from the Chancellor . 5 Message from the Interim Vice Chancellor, Student Affairs . 6 Deans’ Messages & Ceremonies Claire Trevor School of the Arts. 7-8 School of Biological Sciences . 9-10 The Paul Merage School of Business . 11-12 School of Education . .13-14 Samueli School of Engineering . .15-16 Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences . 17-21 School of Medicine . 18, 20 Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing . 18, 21 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences . .19, 21 Program in Public Health . .19, 21 School of Humanities . 22-23 Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences . 24-25 School of Law . 26-27 School of Physical Sciences . .28-29 School of Social Ecology . 30-31 School of Social Sciences . 32-33 Graduate Division . .34-35 List of Graduates Advanced Degree Candidates . 36 Undergraduate Degree Candidates Claire Trevor School of the Arts. 47 School of Biological Sciences . .48 The Paul Merage School of Business . 52 School of Education . 54 The Henry Samueli School of Engineering . 55 School of Humanities . .60 Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences . 63 Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing . 67 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 67 School of Physical Sciences . 68 Program in Public Health . 70 School of Social Ecology . 73 School of Social Sciences .
    [Show full text]
  • Torture Not Treatment
    I -Child restrained at waist, arms, chest, groin and feet in isolation room -Leg cuffs used to restrain children in chairs -Cover Photo: Child face-down on a four-point restraint board attached to electric shock device. Torture not Treatment: Electric Shock and Long-Term Restraint in the United States on Children and Adults with Disabilities at the Judge Rotenberg Center Urgent Appeal to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Presented by: Mental Disability Rights International 1156 15th Street NW, Suite 1001 Washington, DC 20005 www.mdri.org Primary Author/Researcher: Laurie Ahern President Co-Author: Eric Rosenthal, Esq. Executive Director Torture Not Treatment: Electric Shock and Long-Term Restraint in the United States on Children and Adults with Disabilities at the Judge Rotenberg Center Copyright 2010, Mental Disability Rights International Copies of this report are available from: Mental Disability Rights International 1156 15th Street, NW Suite 1001 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: 202.296.0800 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mdri.org All photos copyright CBS Inc., 1994, Eye to Eye with Connie Chung Mental Disability Rights International Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI) is an international human rights organization dedicated to the human rights and full participation in society of people with disabilities worldwide. MDRI documents human rights abuses, supports the development of disability rights advocacy, and promotes international awareness and oversight of the rights of people with disabilities. MDRI advises governments and non-governmental organizations to plan strategies to bring about effective rights enforcement and service-system reform. Drawing on the skills of attorneys, mental health professionals, people with disabilities and their families, MDRI challenges the discrimination and abuse faced by people with disabilities worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Theire Journal
    CONTENTSFEATURES THE IRE JOURNAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 21 TRAFFIC STOPS Justice for sale as police downgrade JULY/AUGUST 2005 violations in return for ‘donations’ 4 Culture critical By Clark Kauffman for investigative reporting The Des Moines Register By Brant Houston, IRE 6 Denver conference features 22- 30 BLOODY SUNDAYS candid, emotional Dan Rather Analysis finds NFL injuries worse By The IRE Journal after rule changes to energize game By Carl Prine 8 IRE CELEBRATES 30 YEARS! Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Vision continues to be upheld through members, board, staff HORSE TRACK INJURIES By Steve Weinberg Health privacy laws help The IRE Journal trainers hide lack of coverage for workers 14 Investigative journalism on radio: By Janet Patton Brilliant sparks promising Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader By Amanda Buck The IRE Journal STEROID SALES Illegal drugs obtained on eBay 17 JAILHOUSE TALK despite site’s security measures Phone companies, counties earn millions By Mike Brunker through unregulated rates for inmate calls MSNBC.com By Kim Curtis and Bob Porterfield The Associated Press 31 INSIDE DEAL 18 FUGITIVE CAPTURE Reporting leads to charges against mayor, associates Electronic documents help reporter in plan to profit from redevelopment of industrial site track killer, 15 years after prison escape By Peter Panepento and Kevin Flowers Erie (Pa.) Times-News By Linda J. Johnson Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader 32 SEX SCANDAL 19 BLOG ALERT Rumors, document hints, interviews Battalion of citizen investigative reporters lead to long-held secret about former governor cannot be ignored by mainstream media By Nigel Jaquiss Willamette Week (Portland, Ore.) By Michelle Dammon Loyalka The IRE Journal 34 BOND DEALS Despite campaign reform, municipal bonding still tends to follow campaign contributions By David Dietz ABOUT THE COVER Bloomberg Markets The cost of competition photos from the Lexington 35 RECORD DECEIT State passes sweeping ethics reform Herald-Leader and the after legislator concocts stories, documents Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds Apart: How the Distance Between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future
    Worlds Apart Worlds Apart HOW THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND JOURNALISM THREATENS AMERICA’S FUTURE JIM HARTZ AND RICK CHAPPELL, PH.D. iv Worlds Apart: How the Distance Between Science and Journalism Threatens America’s Future By Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Ph.D. ©1997 First Amendment Center 1207 18th Avenue South Nashville, TN 37212 (615) 321-9588 www.freedomforum.org Editor: Natilee Duning Designer: David Smith Publication: #98-F02 To order: 1-800-830-3733 Contents Foreword vii Scientists Needn’t Take Themselves Seriously To Do Serious Science 39 Introduction ix Concise writing 40 Talk to the customers 41 Overview xi An end to infighting 42 The incremental nature of science 43 The Unscientific Americans 1 Scientific Publishing 44 Serious omissions 2 Science and the Fourth Estate 47 The U.S. science establishment 4 Public disillusionment 48 Looking ahead at falling behind 5 Spreading tabloidization 48 Out of sight, out of money 7 v Is anybody there? 8 Unprepared but interested 50 The regional press 50 The 7 Percent Solution 10 The good science reporter 51 Common Denominators 13 Hooked on science 52 Gauging the Importance of Science 53 Unfriendly assessments 13 When tortoise meets hare 14 Media Gatekeepers 55 Language barriers 15 Margin of error 16 The current agenda 55 Objective vs. subjective 17 Not enough interest 57 Gatekeepers as obstacles 58 Changing times, concurrent threats 17 What does the public want? 19 Nothing Succeeds Like Substance 60 A new interest in interaction 20 Running Scared 61 Dams, Diversions & Bottlenecks 21 Meanwhile,
    [Show full text]