Terrorist Financing on the Internet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Terrorist Financing on the Internet JUNE 2009 . VOL 2 . ISSUE 6 Terrorist Financing on the entity called “Azzam Publications” and whose leaders were impressed by his a number of associated websites that computer knowledge and ambition. Internet were primarily focused on supporting He quickly developed close ties to the the Taliban in Afghanistan and the organization.6 AQI began feeding videos By Michael Jacobson mujahidin in Chechnya. On these sites, directly to Tsouli for him to post.7 At Babar solicited funds, attempted to the outset, Tsouli uploaded these videos since the september 11 attacks on the recruit fighters, and even provided to free webhosting services, and at this United States, al-Qa`ida has come detailed instructions on how individuals point he had few expenses and little need under growing international pressure. could move both themselves and money for funds. These free sites, however, In response, the terrorist organization to conflict zones.2 The website was had limited bandwidth and soon came has increasingly relied on the internet explicit in its purpose.3 to slow Tsouli down as he ramped up to spread its message and gain support his activities. Tsouli then turned to throughout the world. While its use To persuade individuals to donate, Babar sites with better technical capabilities, of the internet for propaganda and used a familiar argument: supporting but that forced him to raise money.8 recruiting purposes has received wide jihad in some fashion was an obligation publicity, al-Qa`ida has also utilized the incumbent upon every Muslim. Babar Not surprisingly, given his expertise, internet for a variety of other purposes, noted that even if one could not fight Tsouli turned to the internet to raise including terrorist financing. Al- in the jihad, they nonetheless had a the funds to pay for these sites. Tsouli Qa`ida is far from alone among terrorist religious obligation to contribute funds. and his partner, Tariq al-Daour, organizations in exploiting the internet He argued that the began acquiring stolen credit card for financing. A wide range of other numbers on the web, purchasing them terrorist groups—including Hamas, first and most important thing through various online forums, such Lashkar-i-Tayyiba and Hizb Allah— that Muslims can do in the West as Cardplanet.9 By the time Tsouli and have also used the internet to raise and is to donate money and to raise his partner were arrested, al-Daour had transfer needed funds to support their it amongst their families, friends accumulated 37,000 stolen credit card activities. and others…for someone who is numbers on his computer, which they not able to fight at this moment had used to make more than $3.5 million The internet offers broad reach, timely in time due to a valid excuse they in charges.10 Tsouli laundered money efficiency, as well as a certain degree of can start by the collection and through a number of online gambling anonymity and security for both donors donation of funds.4 sites, such as absolutepoker.com and and recipients. Although governments paradisepoker.com, using the stolen throughout the world now recognize that Babar’s case is just one example of early credit card information. They conducted the internet is an increasingly valuable terrorist use of the internet for financing hundreds of transactions at 43 different tool for terrorist organizations, the purposes. websites in total. Any winnings were response has been inconsistent. For the cashed in and transferred electronically United States and its allies to effectively Financing Earned through Online Criminal to bank accounts specifically established counter this dangerous trend, they will Activity for this purpose. In this way, the money have to prioritize their efforts in this One of the primary ways that terrorist would now appear legitimately won, area in the years to come. This article groups use the internet to raise funds is and thus successfully laundered.11 In provides an example of early terrorist through criminal activity. Younis Tsouli, total, Tsouli used 72 of these credit use of the internet, explains how and a young British man better known by cards to register 180 websites, hosted why terrorists launder and raise funds his internet code-name “Irhabi 007,”5 by 95 different companies.12 through websites, and examines the may today be the best known virtual challenges of countering this problem terrorist. Tsouli began his “career” 6 Gordon Corera, “The World’s Most Wanted Cyber- effectively. by posting videos depicting terrorist Jihadist,” BBC News, January 16, 2008. activity on various websites. He came to 7 Ibid. Early Terrorist Financing on the Internet the attention of al-Qa`ida in Iraq (AQI), 8 “Cyber Operative Charged in Real World Terror Plot,” While terrorists’ use of the internet for Anti-Defamation League, March 1, 2006. finance-related activities dramatically Ahmad,” September 2004 and indictment of Ahmad in 9 “U.S. Secret Service’s Operation Firewall Nets 28 Ar- increased after 9/11, it began well before. U.S.A. v. Babar Ahmad, District Court of Connecticut, rests,” U.S. Secret Service, press release, October 28, The most prominent example was Babar 2004. 2004. These forums obtained the credit cards through Ahmad, a young British citizen from 2 “Affadavit in Support of Request for Extradition of various online scams and e-mail viruses. See Brian South London who put his computer Babar Ahmad.” Krebs, “Terrorism’s Hook into Your Inbox,” Washington expertise to use early on in support of 3 On a question and answer page, Babar wrote that “Az- Post, July 5, 2007. the jihadist cause until his arrest in zam Publications has been set up to propagate the call for 10 For example, one New Jersey woman described how 2004.1 Beginning in 1997, Babar ran an jihad among the Muslims who are sitting down, ignorant she received an e-mail asking her to verify eBay account of this vital duty…Thus the purpose of Azzam Publica- information, which she completed, including sensitive fi- 1 Babar was arrested in 2004 by the United Kingdom on tions is to ‘incite the believers’ and secondly to raise some nancial information. Al-Daour ended up with her credit the basis of an extradition request by the United States. money for the brothers.” card information. For more, see Krebs. Babar’s appeals of the extradition request are still cur- 4 “Affadavit in Support of Request for Extradition of 11 Krebs. rently pending. For more, see U.S.A. v. Babar Ahmad, Babar Ahmad.” 12 Written statement from Andy Cochran at “Do the “Affadavit in Support of Request for Extradition of Babar 5 “Irhabi 007” means “Terrorist 007.” Payment Card Industry Data Standards Reduce Cyber- JUNE 2009 . VOL 2 . ISSUE 6 Charities (GRF), an organization designated in of the internet to raise and transfer Charities and non-governmental 2002 by the U.S. Treasury Department funds is also part of a broader global organizations (NGO) remain a major for its ties to al-Qa`ida and the Taliban.15 shift toward the use of technology in problem in the terrorist financing arena, On its website, the GRF said that the international commerce. There have and their activities on the internet are charity was “organized exclusively been dramatic shifts in how funds can no exception to this troublesome trend. for charitable, religious, education be transferred from one destination According to the Paris-based Financial and scientific purposes including to to another, with new technological Action Task Force, “the misuse of non- establish, promote, and carry out relief developments. Transferring funds profit organizations for the financing of and charitable activities, projects, electronically—using the internet to terrorism is coming to be recognized as a organizations, institutions and funds.” initiate transactions—has become crucial weak point in the global struggle GRF’s mission statement focused on increasingly common through services to stop such funding at its source.”13 its work in emergency relief, medical such as PayPal. Transactions can also Charities are especially susceptible to aid, advancement of education and be conducted through cell phones abuse by terrorists and their supporters development of social welfare, noting in what are now better known as for whom charitable or humanitarian that it will “act with goodwill towards “M-payments.” In countries where organizations are particularly all people.” GRF accepted donations the formal financial sector is less attractive front organizations. Some through its website, with donors able to than robust—such as in many African charities are founded with the express pay through credit and debit cards, and countries—using the internet or cell purpose of financing terror, while wire transfers, among other means.16 phones to facilitate transfers is a far others are existing entities that are In reality, the charity was set up and more attractive and readily available infiltrated by terrorist operatives and run for years by Rabih Haddad, who option. Online gambling sites and supporters and co-opted from within. was allegedly a previous member of other similar entities have also made it It is a significant challenge for law Maktab al-Khidmat (Services Bureau), the easier to launder money on the internet enforcement, intelligence officials, “precursor organization to al Qaeda.”17 than it was in the past—a practice that and charity headquarters personnel to terrorist groups have taken advantage effectively monitor funds distributed Another al-Qa`ida-linked NGO, the al- of in recent years. While this type of in conflict zones, which can be easily Haramain Islamic Foundation, a Saudi- activity could potentially expose them diverted away from the intended cause. based NGO that was designated by the to detection, terrorists attempt to mask Another challenge for governments that U.S.
Recommended publications
  • A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew .J Piers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Review Volume 25 Issue 2 Spring 2005 Article 7 The Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines: The Impact on International Philanthropy April 2005 Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew .J Piers Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Recommended Citation Matthew J. Piers, Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation , 25 Pace L. Rev. 339 (2005) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol25/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew J. Piers Three years ago we, as a nation, suffered a ghastly act of mass murder and terrorism apparently perpetrated by the self-proclaimed Islamic fundamentalist group, al Qaeda. A remarkable thing occurred in the wake of this tragedy: the United States, already feared and respected as the world's sole remaining super power, became the object of a tidal wave of international support and sympathy. Perhaps never before in our nation's relatively short history have so many hands and hearts reached out to us. The potential to build on this historic outpouring of support and sympathy, both domestically and internationally, was enormous.
    [Show full text]
  • JIHAD Pag 1-10 Revazut.Qxd
    JIHADUL ISLAMIC DE LA "|NFRÂNGEREA TERORII" {I "R+ZBOIUL SFÂNT" LA "SPERAN}A LIBERT+}II" JIHADUL ISLAMIC 1 Foto coperta I • SHEIKH MAWLANA MUHAMMAD HISHAM COD CNCSIS 270 ANDREESCU, ANGHEL Jihadul Islamic de la ''|nfrângerea terorii'' [i ''R=zboiul Sfânt''ANDREESCU, la ''speran]a ANGHEL libert=]ii'' / Anghel Andreescu, NicolaeJihadul Radu. Islamic - Bucure[ti: de la ''|nfrângerea Editura Ministerului terorii'' [i ''R=zboiulInternelor [iSfânt'' Reformei la Administrative,''speran]a libert=]ii'' 2008 / Anghel Andreescu, Bibliogr.Nicolae Radu. - Bucure[ti: Editura Ministerului Internelor ISBN[i Reformei 978-973-745-011-1 Administrative, 2008 Bibliogr. I.ISBN Radu, 978-973-745-011-1 Nicolae 329.7(¡411.21)I. Radu, Nicolae Jihad 329.7(¡411.21) Jihad Opera]ii editoriale: colectiv Editura MIRA Tip=rit: Tipografia Codex Anghel ANDREESCU, Nicolae RADU 2 Chestor general de poli]ie Comisar [ef prof. univ. dr. Anghel ANDREESCU conf. univ. dr. Nicolae RADU JIHADULJIHADUL ISLAMICISLAMIC DE LA "|NFRÂNGEREA TERORII" {I "R+ZBOIUL SFÂNT" LA "SPERAN}A LIBERT+}II" BUCURE{TI – 2008 – JIHADUL ISLAMIC 3 Cuprins Gând pentru toleran]= . 9 Prefa]= . 11 Introducere . 15 Introduction . 29 Introduction . 43 Lista abrevieri . 59 Capitolul 1 De la Islam la cunoa[terea Jihadului . 65 Cât de bine cunoa[tem Islamul? . 65 Unicitatea lui Allah . 79 |n numele credin]ei . 96 Calea spre Mecca . 98 Ebraismul confirmat . 103 Moartea Profetului . .104 Urma[ii lui Mahomed . 106 Dinastia Abbasida [i civiliza]ia islamic= . 109 |n=l]are [i dec=dere . 110 {ii]i [i suni]i . 111 Religia \ntre [ii]i [i suni]i . 113 Cartea Sfânt= a Islamului . 115 Nemurirea sufletului .
    [Show full text]
  • The Jihadist Threat in France CLARA BEYLER
    The Jihadist Threat in France CLARA BEYLER INCE THE MADRID AND LONDON BOMBINGS, Europeans elsewhere— fearful that they may become the next targets of Islamist terrorism— are finally beginning to face the consequences of the long, unchecked Sgrowth of radical Islam on their continent. The July bombings in London, while having the distinction of being the first suicide attacks in Western Eu- rope, were not the first time terrorists targeted a major European subway system. Ten years ago, a group linked to the Algerian Armed Islamic Group (Groupe Islamique Armé—GIA) unleashed a series of bombings on the Paris metro system. Since 1996, however, France has successfully avoided any ma- jor attack on its soil by an extremist Muslim group. This is due not to any lack of terrorist attempts—(only last September, France arrested nine members of a radical Islamist cell planning to attack the metro system)—but rather to the efficiency of the French counterterrorist services.1 France is now home to between five to six million Muslims—the sec- ond largest religious group in France, and the largest Muslim population in any Western European country.2 The majority of this very diverse population practices and believes in an apolitical, nonviolent Islam.3 A minority of them, however, are extremists. Islamist groups are actively operating in France to- day, spreading radical ideology and recruiting for future terrorist attacks on French soil and abroad. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of France’s Islamist groups, the evolving threats they have posed and continue to pose to French society, and the response of the French authorities to these threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development: Criminalizing Support for Non-Designated Charities
    Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity CHILLING MUSLIM CHARITABLE GIVING in the “WAR ON TERRORISM FINANCING” Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity: Chilling Muslim Charitable Giving in the “War on Terrorism Financing” PUBLISHED: June 2009 FRONT COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Alex Wong/Getty Images Members of a Muslim congregation in Virginia give Zakat donations for the needy before they enter a mosque for a service to mark the conclusion of the holy month of Ramadan, the height of annual Muslim charitable giving. Zakat is one of the core “five pillars” of Islam and a religious obligation for all observant Muslims. BACK COVER PHOTOGRAPHS: LEFT: Brandon Dill/Memphis Commercial Appeal RIGHT: LIFE for Relief and Development THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION is the nation’s premier guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the laws and treaties of the United States. OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Susan N. Herman, President Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director Richard Zacks, Treasurer ACLU NATIONAL OFFICE 125 Broad Street, 18th Fl. New York, NY 10004-2400 (212) 549-2500 www.aclu.org Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 7 a. Introduction .............................................................................................................................7 b. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Funding of Islamic Extremist Groups Undermining US Interests and the War on Terror from Within T
    MENU Policy Analysis / Congressional Testimony Subversion from Within: Saudi Funding of Islamic Extremist Groups Undermining U.S. Interests and the War on Terror from within the United States by Matthew Levitt Sep 10, 2003 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony T estimony before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security INTRODUCTION Well into the war on terrorism, Saudi Arabia continues to serve as the capital of international terrorist financing. Through groups like the Muslim World League (MWL), the International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO), the al Haramain Islamic Foundation, as well as the Islamic Affairs Bureaus located at Saudi embassies and consulates worldwide, the Saudis continue to fund radical Islamic groups supportive of, or engaged in, international terrorism. TIER 1: FINANCING TERRORISM Some cases are both clearcut and extreme. For example, after his arrest in Indonesia on June 5, 2002, Omar al- Farouq, al-Qaeda's operational point man in Southeast Asia, told his interrogators that al-Qaeda operations in the region were funded through a branch of al-Haramain. According to al-Farouq, "money was laundered through the foundation by donors from the Middle East."[1] In another case, Italian prosecutors revealed that "Syria has functioned as a hub for an al-Qaeda network" run out of Europe and linked to prominent al-Qaeda operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.[2] Transcripts of operatives' conversations -- first revealed in the Los Angeles Times -- "paint a detailed picture of overseers in Syria coordinating the movement of recruits and money" between cells in Europe and Ansar al-Islam training camps in northern Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act and Its Implications on Nonprofit
    PATRIOT GAMES The USA Patriot Act1 and its Impact on Nonprofit Organizations By Tim Visser and Kay Guinane Executive Summary The Bush administration recently shut down a number of Muslim-based nonprofit organizations using new powers under the USA Patriot Act, which was passed shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. No criminal charges were made against these organizations, nor were they officially designated terrorist supporters.2 Law enforcement officials simply froze their assets and seized their property “pending an investigation” without producing any evidence, as authorized by the act. Consequently, the burden of proof has shifted to the organizations, which must prove their innocence even though, in many cases, the government has not specified wrongdoing. Moreover, they must do this without access to their own documents, computers, records, or other materials that might make their case. Making matters worse for these organizations, the government controls the information judges see and how they see it; investigators can label evidence confidential for national security reasons and then bring it before a court without the target being represented. This allows the government to present part of the picture most favorable to its case -- which targets are not allowed to confront -- while withholding information that might prove innocence. As one target, the Global Relief Foundation, put it, “In fact, [the Treasury Department] has stated in court that it will base its case on evidence GRF may never see.”3 This secret evidence has also made it difficult to understand the how the act is being applied, although the Bush administration appears to be interpreting its mandate broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • High Alert: the Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 45 (2003-2004) Issue 4 Article 3 March 2004 High Alert: The Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy Nina J. Crimm [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the National Security Law Commons Repository Citation Nina J. Crimm, High Alert: The Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy, 45 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1341 (2004), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol45/iss4/3 Copyright c 2004 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr HIGH ALERT: THE GOVERNMENT'S WAR ON THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DONORS, DOMESTIC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, AND GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY NINA J. CRIMM* ABSTRACT Within days after the September 11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. government extended its already existing commitment to combat terrorism. President Bush declared a financial war on terrorism, with the aim of depriving terrorists of their necessary financial support. He issued Executive Order 13,224, which ordered the blocking of assets of specially designated global terrorists.' Congress enacted legislation that not only fortified previously existing criminal and civil laws, but also added new ones for use in combating terrorists and terrorism. The Bush Administration dedicated resources to existing and newly created governmental structures that would be responsible for enforcing these laws and for waging the financial war on terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable and Humanitarian Organizations in the Network of International Terrorist Financing | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Congressional Testimony Charitable and Humanitarian Organizations in the Network of International Terrorist Financing by Matthew Levitt Aug 1, 2002 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony estimony before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on T International Trade and Finance I. INTRODUCTION The synchronized suicide attacks of September 11 highlighted the critical role financial and logistical support networks play in the operations of international terrorist organizations. According to financial profiles released by the FBI, the attacks cost between $303,672 and $500,000.1 Unfortunately, the network of international terrorist financing is both established and sophisticated. The investigative value of following the trail of terrorist financing has long been known. Then-FBI Director Louis Freeh testified before Congress in 1999 that a shortage of funds prevented the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center from being as devastating as it otherwise could have been. After his capture in 1995, Ramzi Yousef, the convicted mastermind behind the 1993 bombing and other attacks, admitted that the terrorists were unable to purchase sufficient material to build as large a bomb as they had intended because they were strapped for cash. In fact, the operation itself was rushed and carried out earlier than planned because the cell simply ran out of money. In the end, the terrorists' attempt to reclaim the deposit fee on the rental truck used to transport the bomb provided a key break in the case.2 The al Qaeda suicide hijackings underscored the post-blast, investigative utility of tracking the money trail, but they also drove home the critical need to preemptively deny terrorists the funds they need to conduct their attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Dire
    Case 3:15-cv-01343-SI Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 34 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation COLIN A. KISOR Deputy Director, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation CHRISTOPHER W. DEMPSEY Assistant Director, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 532-4110 Facsimile: (202) 532-5393 [email protected] Attorneys for United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. 3:15-cv-1343 ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) COMPLAINT TO REVOKE MOHAMED SHEIKH ABDIRAHMAN ) NATURALIZATION KARIYE, a.k.a. MOHAMED SHEIKH ) ABDIRAHMAN a.k.a. SHEIKH KARIYE ) a.k.a. SHEIKH MOHAMED ) ABDIRAHMAN a.k.a. MAXAMED ) SHEIKH CABDIRAXMAN KARIYE a.k.a. ) MOHAMED ABDULRAHMAN SHEIKH ) CABDIRAXMAN KARIYE a.k.a. ABU ) ABDUL RAHMAN a.k.a. ABU ) ABDIRAHMAN a.k.a. ABU AL RAHMAN ) a.k.a. ABU RAHMAN ) ) Defendant. ) - 1 - Case 3:15-cv-01343-SI Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 34 I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is an action under 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a) to revoke and set aside the order admitting Mohamed Sheikh Abdirahman Kariye a.k.a. Mohamed Sheikh Abdirahman a.k.a. Sheikh Kariye a.k.a. Sheikh Mohamed Abdirahman a.k.a. Mohamed Abdulrahman Maxamed Sheikh Cabdiraxman Kariye a.k.a. Abu Hafsa a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • CAIR) Steven Merley
    Global Muslim Brotherhood Research Center Extremism and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Steven Merley January 2007 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................1 SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................7 BacKGROUND ................................................................................................................................7 SCOPE OF INQuiry AND DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................8 1. Fundamentalism ............................................................................................................................8 2. Anti-Semitism ...............................................................................................................................8 3. Terrorism ........................................................................................................................................8 FOUNDING OF CAIR ........................................................................................................................8 Islamic Association for Palestine .......................................................................................................8 Founding of CAIR ........................................................................................................................... 11 Early Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)
    Muslim Public Affairs Council An IPT Investigative Report Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MPAC’ S ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY : A PRIMER ............................... 4 A. The Muslim Brotherhood ....................................................................................................... 4 B. MPAC’s “Founding Fathers” .................................................................................................. 5 1. Dr. Maher Hathout .............................................................................................................. 5 2. Dr. Mohamed Fathi Osman ............................................................................................... 7 C. The Muslim Public Affairs Council Today ............................................................................ 8 BROADCASTING HATE : MPAC’ S MEDIA WING ....................................................... 11 A. Downplaying the Threat Posed by Islamic Extremists .................................................... 11 B. Inflammatory Rhetoric About Jews and Zionism ............................................................ 13 C. The Minaret’s Anti-Semitic and Radical Cartoons ........................................................... 16 D. Conspiracy Theories about the 1993 World Trade Center Bombings and 9/11 ......... 31 ANTI -SEMITIC HATE SPEECH ................................................................................. 33 A. Anti-Israeli
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES of AMERICA V. M
    Case 4:05-cr-40026-FDS Document 577 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________________________________ ) UNITED STATES of AMERICA ) ) v. )Criminal No. ) 05-40026-FDS MUHAMED MUBAYYID, ) EMADEDDIN Z. MUNTASSER, and ) SAMIR AL-MONLA, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL UNDER RULE 29 AND GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION SAYLOR, J. This is a criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy to defraud the United States), 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false statements), and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (false statements on tax returns). In essence, the indictment charged that defendants Muhamed Mubayyid, Emadeddin Z. Muntasser, and Samir Al-Monla fraudulently obtained a charitable exemption under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code for an entity known as Care International, Inc. According to the indictment, defendants concealed the fact that Care International solicited and distributed funds for, and issued publications supporting and promoting, Islamic holy war (“jihad”) and holy warriors (“mujahideen”). After a jury trial that began on November 13, 2007, and concluded on January 11, 2008, defendants were convicted on multiple counts. All three defendants moved for judgment of acquittal as to all counts at the close of the government’s evidence, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 29, which the Court granted as to part of Count Eight and otherwise denied. All three defendants Case 4:05-cr-40026-FDS Document 577 Filed 07/24/08 Page 2 of 48 renewed those motions after the trial. The Court issued its ruling from the bench as to those motions on June 3, 2008, granting those motions in part and denying them in part.
    [Show full text]