DOCSLIB.ORG

Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) Muslim Public Affairs Council An IPT Investigative Report Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MPAC’ S ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY : A PRIMER ............................... 4 A. The Muslim Brotherhood ....................................................................................................... 4 B. MPAC’s “Founding Fathers” .................................................................................................. 5 1. Dr. Maher Hathout .............................................................................................................. 5 2. Dr. Mohamed Fathi Osman ............................................................................................... 7 C. The Muslim Public Affairs Council Today ............................................................................ 8 BROADCASTING HATE : MPAC’ S MEDIA WING ....................................................... 11 A. Downplaying the Threat Posed by Islamic Extremists .................................................... 11 B. Inflammatory Rhetoric About Jews and Zionism ............................................................ 13 C. The Minaret’s Anti-Semitic and Radical Cartoons ........................................................... 16 D. Conspiracy Theories about the 1993 World Trade Center Bombings and 9/11 ......... 31 ANTI -SEMITIC HATE SPEECH ................................................................................. 33 A. Anti-Israeli Rhetoric .............................................................................................................. 33 B. Support for, and Defense of, Foreign Terrorist Organizations ...................................... 41 STOKING DISTRUST : ATTEMPTS TO UNDERMINE U.S.-MUSLIM RELATIONS ............... 43 A. MPAC: The U.S. is Engaged in a “War on Islam” ............................................................... 43 B. Impeding Criminal Investigations by Sowing Distrust ................................................... 47 C. Criticism of Report by National Commission on Terrorism ............................................ 48 D. The USA PATRIOT Act ........................................................................................................... 49 E. Fusion Centers ....................................................................................................................... 50 F. Use of Informants .................................................................................................................. 51 IN DEFENSE OF TERRORIST FINANCIERS .................................................................. 52 The Investigative Project on Terrorism Page | 2 A. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development ....................................................... 54 B. Infocom ................................................................................................................................... 56 C. Benevolence International Foundation and Global Relief Foundation ....................... 57 D. Islamic American Relief Agency .......................................................................................... 60 E. KindHearts .............................................................................................................................. 61 F. SAAR Foundation .................................................................................................................. 62 DEFENDING DOMESTIC TERRORISTS ....................................................................... 63 A. On the Millennium Plot: Downplaying Ahmed Ressam ................................................. 63 B. Dr. Rafil Dhafir........................................................................................................................ 64 C. “Virginia Jihad” ...................................................................................................................... 64 D. Abdurahman Alamoudi ....................................................................................................... 65 E. Sami Al-Arian ......................................................................................................................... 66 F. Muhammad Salah ................................................................................................................. 67 G. Imam Wagdy Ghoneim ........................................................................................................ 68 H. Ahmadullah Niazi .................................................................................................................. 69 I. James Cromitie and the Bronx Terror Plot ........................................................................ 70 J. Daniel Boyd and the North Carolina Cell .......................................................................... 71 APPENDIX A: MPAC TIES TO THE ICSC ................................................................. 72 APPENDIX B: MPAC AND THE MINARET ................................................................. 76 APPENDIX C: MPAC AND MULTIMEDIA VERA INTERNATIONAL ................................ 79 Page | 3 Muslim Public Affairs Council Executive Summary Founded in 1988 as an off-shoot of the Islamic Center of Southern California (ICSC), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) hails itself as a “public service agency working for the civil rights of American Muslims, for the integration of Islam into American pluralism, and for a positive constructive relationship between American Muslims and their representatives.” 1 Despite this magnanimous mission statement, since its inception, an analysis of the group’s membership, statements, and publications reveals a far more menacing organization. In reality, MPAC routinely speaks in defense of designated terrorist organizations, as well as individuals and charities that are supporters of terrorism; opposes U.S. counterterrorism measures as part of a consistent knee-jerk reaction claiming bias and discrimination behind law enforcement efforts; and reflects a blatant and conspiratorial anti-Semitism. Part I of this report will examine MPAC’s history of broadcasting, in print media, a message of hate. MPAC’s leadership and members have repeatedly graced the pages of the ICSC’s magazine The Minaret , downplaying the threat posed by Islamic extremists, propagating inflammatory rhetoric about Jews and Zionism, and reiterating conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11, 2001. Part II of this report will take an in-depth look at the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist hate rhetoric that has been put forth by MPAC. MPAC routinely makes allegations that perpetuate anti- Semitic stereotypes and incite hatred towards Jews. The results have been consistent criticism of the creation of the State of Israel, the continued existence of the nation, and U.S. support for what is viewed as anti-Islamic actions undertaken by Israel. Next, Part III will review MPAC’s historical attempts to sow distrust between the American and Arab American communities. Whether it is in the form of generalized fear mongering or more specific allegations that the “war on terrorism” is a “war on Islam,” the leadership of MPAC has done more to undercut relations between these two segments of our society than it has to forge ties. Part IV of this report will closely examine MPAC’s defense of terrorist financiers. Rather than concede the obvious—that terrorist groups have used Islamic charities as cover for financing their violence acts—MPAC has consistently criticized U.S. counter-terrorism efforts by arguing that criminal investigations and prosecutions are based on politics rather than fact. Finally, Part V recounts MPAC’s statements in defense of domestic and international terrorists. As with MPAC’s response to U.S. efforts to shut down the support structure for terrorist organizations, the group has publicly defended at least a dozen individuals suspected of terrorist activity within the United States. 1 Muslim Public Affairs Council Web Page, “About MPAC,” http://www.mpac.org/about/#axzz0eKMCPAE8 , viewed February 1, 2010. The Investigative Project on Terrorism Page | 4 The Development of MPAC’s Islamist Ideology: A Primer Throughout the 1980s there was a perceived need in the American-Muslim community to become more involved in the American political scene by developing political action committees. In response, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) was founded in 1986 in Los Angeles as the Muslim Political Action Committee 2 of the Islamic Center of Southern California (ICSC). 3 After working in concert with the ICSC for a few years, MPAC declared its independence in 1988 and was renamed the Muslim Public Affairs Council. Although now independent, MPAC remains intertwined with the ICSC, as demonstrated by its shared leadership and membership. 4 Perhaps more important than an overlap in personnel, MPAC and ICSC also share a common Islamist ideology. This ideology can be traced back to the organizations’ principle founders Dr. Maher Hathout 5 and Dr. Sabri el Farra. 6 Although we will discuss the biographies of each of these men and their relationships with MPAC and the ICSC at length, infra , it is important to begin this story where the stories of so many modern day Islamist organizations began—with the Muslim Brotherhood. A. The Muslim Brotherhood In 1928, Hassan al Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood (“MB”), a rigidly conservative and highly secretive Egyptian-based
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew .J Piers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Review Volume 25 Issue 2 Spring 2005 Article 7 The Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines: The Impact on International Philanthropy April 2005 Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew .J Piers Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Recommended Citation Matthew J. Piers, Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation , 25 Pace L. Rev. 339 (2005) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol25/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malevolent Destruction of a Muslim Charity: A Commentary on the Prosecution of Benevolence International Foundation Matthew J. Piers Three years ago we, as a nation, suffered a ghastly act of mass murder and terrorism apparently perpetrated by the self-proclaimed Islamic fundamentalist group, al Qaeda. A remarkable thing occurred in the wake of this tragedy: the United States, already feared and respected as the world's sole remaining super power, became the object of a tidal wave of international support and sympathy. Perhaps never before in our nation's relatively short history have so many hands and hearts reached out to us. The potential to build on this historic outpouring of support and sympathy, both domestically and internationally, was enormous.
    [Show full text]
  • JIHAD Pag 1-10 Revazut.Qxd
    JIHADUL ISLAMIC DE LA "|NFRÂNGEREA TERORII" {I "R+ZBOIUL SFÂNT" LA "SPERAN}A LIBERT+}II" JIHADUL ISLAMIC 1 Foto coperta I • SHEIKH MAWLANA MUHAMMAD HISHAM COD CNCSIS 270 ANDREESCU, ANGHEL Jihadul Islamic de la ''|nfrângerea terorii'' [i ''R=zboiul Sfânt''ANDREESCU, la ''speran]a ANGHEL libert=]ii'' / Anghel Andreescu, NicolaeJihadul Radu. Islamic - Bucure[ti: de la ''|nfrângerea Editura Ministerului terorii'' [i ''R=zboiulInternelor [iSfânt'' Reformei la Administrative,''speran]a libert=]ii'' 2008 / Anghel Andreescu, Bibliogr.Nicolae Radu. - Bucure[ti: Editura Ministerului Internelor ISBN[i Reformei 978-973-745-011-1 Administrative, 2008 Bibliogr. I.ISBN Radu, 978-973-745-011-1 Nicolae 329.7(¡411.21)I. Radu, Nicolae Jihad 329.7(¡411.21) Jihad Opera]ii editoriale: colectiv Editura MIRA Tip=rit: Tipografia Codex Anghel ANDREESCU, Nicolae RADU 2 Chestor general de poli]ie Comisar [ef prof. univ. dr. Anghel ANDREESCU conf. univ. dr. Nicolae RADU JIHADULJIHADUL ISLAMICISLAMIC DE LA "|NFRÂNGEREA TERORII" {I "R+ZBOIUL SFÂNT" LA "SPERAN}A LIBERT+}II" BUCURE{TI – 2008 – JIHADUL ISLAMIC 3 Cuprins Gând pentru toleran]= . 9 Prefa]= . 11 Introducere . 15 Introduction . 29 Introduction . 43 Lista abrevieri . 59 Capitolul 1 De la Islam la cunoa[terea Jihadului . 65 Cât de bine cunoa[tem Islamul? . 65 Unicitatea lui Allah . 79 |n numele credin]ei . 96 Calea spre Mecca . 98 Ebraismul confirmat . 103 Moartea Profetului . .104 Urma[ii lui Mahomed . 106 Dinastia Abbasida [i civiliza]ia islamic= . 109 |n=l]are [i dec=dere . 110 {ii]i [i suni]i . 111 Religia \ntre [ii]i [i suni]i . 113 Cartea Sfânt= a Islamului . 115 Nemurirea sufletului .
    [Show full text]
  • American University in Cairo School of Humanities And
    American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences Competing Models of the Modern Islamic State: Wahhabi vs. Muslim Brotherhood Ideologies A Thesis Submitted to Political Science Department In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts By Mohammad Abdul-Monaem Abdul-Hamid Affan Under the supervision of Dr. Heba Raouf Ezzat December/2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FIRST AND FOREMOST I THANK ALLAH THE MOST MERCIFUL I AM DEEPLY GRATEFUL TO MY ADVISOR PROF. HEBA RAOUF EZZAT FOR HER CONTINUOUS ACADEMIC SUPPORT AND EXPERT ADVICES AND INSTRUCTIONS. I OWE HER TOO MUCH I WISH TO EXTEND MY CORDIAL THANKS AND GRATITUDE TO MY ACADEMIC READERS: PROF. ASHRAF AL SHERIF AND PROF. AMAL HAMADA FOR THEIR METICULOUS AND INFORMATIVE INSIGHTS AND COMMENTS I AM DEEPLY INDEBTED TO PROF. RABAB EL MAHDY, THE RESPONSIBLE OF ENGAGED SCHOLARS FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FOR HER GREAT EFFORTS AND HELP I AM ALSO THANKFUL TO ALL MY PROFESSORS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO I CANNOT FIND ENOUGH WORDS TO EXPRESS MY DEEP LOVE AND APPRECIATION TO MY PARENTS AND WIFE FOR THEIR ENCOURAGEMENT AND SUPPORT FINALLY, I DEDICATE THIS WORK TO THE SOULS OF EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION MARTYRS NEVER FORGET … NEVER FORGIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures Transliteration CHAPTER ONE: A BACKGROUND ………………………………………………………... 1 I. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 II. Research question, hypothesis, and objectives.…………………………………………….. 3 III. Theoretical Framework……………………………………………………………………... 6 a. Political legitimacy: a search for definition ................................................................ 6 b. Different approaches to the political legitimacy …………………………………….. 8 c. Max Weber’s theory of political legitimacy and its critics ………………………… 10 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Narrative
    (Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin) An Analysis of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Narrative An Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Elon University Honors Program By Kelsey L. Glover April, 2011 Approved by: Dr. Laura Rose le, Thesis Mentor Dr. Brooke Barnett, Communications (Reader) Dr. Tim Wardle, Religious Studies (Reader) AI-Ikhwan al-Muslimin An Analysis of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Narrative Kelsey L. Glover (Dr. Laura Roselle) Department of International Studies-Elon University This study presents an in-depth qualitative analysis of the strategic narrative of the al­ Ikhwan al-Muslimin, also known as the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood is a politically active Islamic organization and has been a formidable player on the political scene as one of the only opposition groups for over eighty years. Given the recent revolution in Egypt, they could have a dramatic impact on the future of the country, and it becomes even more important to understand their strategic narrative, how it has changed over time, and how it could change in the future. In order to analyze these narratives in a systematic manner, I developed a coding instrument to analyze the organization's narratives from the beginning of2008 to the end of2010. The coding instrument, Atlas.ti, was used to code for themes and descriptions of grievances and remedies. I analyzed these narratives to look for reactionary changes and trends over time. My research suggests that there has been a discemable shift in their narrative from their more radical beginnings to a moderate Islamist, pro-democracy movement today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jihadist Threat in France CLARA BEYLER
    The Jihadist Threat in France CLARA BEYLER INCE THE MADRID AND LONDON BOMBINGS, Europeans elsewhere— fearful that they may become the next targets of Islamist terrorism— are finally beginning to face the consequences of the long, unchecked Sgrowth of radical Islam on their continent. The July bombings in London, while having the distinction of being the first suicide attacks in Western Eu- rope, were not the first time terrorists targeted a major European subway system. Ten years ago, a group linked to the Algerian Armed Islamic Group (Groupe Islamique Armé—GIA) unleashed a series of bombings on the Paris metro system. Since 1996, however, France has successfully avoided any ma- jor attack on its soil by an extremist Muslim group. This is due not to any lack of terrorist attempts—(only last September, France arrested nine members of a radical Islamist cell planning to attack the metro system)—but rather to the efficiency of the French counterterrorist services.1 France is now home to between five to six million Muslims—the sec- ond largest religious group in France, and the largest Muslim population in any Western European country.2 The majority of this very diverse population practices and believes in an apolitical, nonviolent Islam.3 A minority of them, however, are extremists. Islamist groups are actively operating in France to- day, spreading radical ideology and recruiting for future terrorist attacks on French soil and abroad. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of France’s Islamist groups, the evolving threats they have posed and continue to pose to French society, and the response of the French authorities to these threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuing the International Relations of Islam: a Critique of IR Theory
    Pursuing the International Relations of Islam: A critique of IR theory Faiz Ahmed Sheikh Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Politics and International Studies September 2013 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that the appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement © 2013 The University of Leeds and Faiz Ahmed Sheikh The right of Faiz Ahmed Sheikh to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. ii Acknowledgements The PhD has been a long journey which could only be completed thanks to the input of innumerable people over the years, be it discussions about the research, or morale boosting company when it was most needed. So, mentioning no names (*cough* Levon Ouzounian, Gordon Clubb, Aree Phothiyarom, Terry Hathaway, Egle Cesnulyte, Simonida Kacarska, James Worrall, Dan Watson, Anne Flaspoeler *cough*), many thanks to my friends, past and present, at the University of Leeds and elsewhere. To my supervisors, Clive Jones and Jonathan Dean, and earlier Brad Evans also, I owe a huge debt of gratitude for keeping me on the straight and narrow in regards to both my PhD work and wider career prospects. Who knows what dark corner of the library I would have found myself in, rocking back and forth and mumbling to passers by about Foucaultian ideas, if it were not for the clear, consistent, and always beneficial guidance of my supervisors, Clive Jones especially.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development: Criminalizing Support for Non-Designated Charities
    Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity CHILLING MUSLIM CHARITABLE GIVING in the “WAR ON TERRORISM FINANCING” Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity: Chilling Muslim Charitable Giving in the “War on Terrorism Financing” PUBLISHED: June 2009 FRONT COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Alex Wong/Getty Images Members of a Muslim congregation in Virginia give Zakat donations for the needy before they enter a mosque for a service to mark the conclusion of the holy month of Ramadan, the height of annual Muslim charitable giving. Zakat is one of the core “five pillars” of Islam and a religious obligation for all observant Muslims. BACK COVER PHOTOGRAPHS: LEFT: Brandon Dill/Memphis Commercial Appeal RIGHT: LIFE for Relief and Development THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION is the nation’s premier guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the laws and treaties of the United States. OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Susan N. Herman, President Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director Richard Zacks, Treasurer ACLU NATIONAL OFFICE 125 Broad Street, 18th Fl. New York, NY 10004-2400 (212) 549-2500 www.aclu.org Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 7 a. Introduction .............................................................................................................................7 b. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Funding of Islamic Extremist Groups Undermining US Interests and the War on Terror from Within T
    MENU Policy Analysis / Congressional Testimony Subversion from Within: Saudi Funding of Islamic Extremist Groups Undermining U.S. Interests and the War on Terror from within the United States by Matthew Levitt Sep 10, 2003 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony T estimony before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security INTRODUCTION Well into the war on terrorism, Saudi Arabia continues to serve as the capital of international terrorist financing. Through groups like the Muslim World League (MWL), the International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO), the al Haramain Islamic Foundation, as well as the Islamic Affairs Bureaus located at Saudi embassies and consulates worldwide, the Saudis continue to fund radical Islamic groups supportive of, or engaged in, international terrorism. TIER 1: FINANCING TERRORISM Some cases are both clearcut and extreme. For example, after his arrest in Indonesia on June 5, 2002, Omar al- Farouq, al-Qaeda's operational point man in Southeast Asia, told his interrogators that al-Qaeda operations in the region were funded through a branch of al-Haramain. According to al-Farouq, "money was laundered through the foundation by donors from the Middle East."[1] In another case, Italian prosecutors revealed that "Syria has functioned as a hub for an al-Qaeda network" run out of Europe and linked to prominent al-Qaeda operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.[2] Transcripts of operatives' conversations -- first revealed in the Los Angeles Times -- "paint a detailed picture of overseers in Syria coordinating the movement of recruits and money" between cells in Europe and Ansar al-Islam training camps in northern Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act and Its Implications on Nonprofit
    PATRIOT GAMES The USA Patriot Act1 and its Impact on Nonprofit Organizations By Tim Visser and Kay Guinane Executive Summary The Bush administration recently shut down a number of Muslim-based nonprofit organizations using new powers under the USA Patriot Act, which was passed shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. No criminal charges were made against these organizations, nor were they officially designated terrorist supporters.2 Law enforcement officials simply froze their assets and seized their property “pending an investigation” without producing any evidence, as authorized by the act. Consequently, the burden of proof has shifted to the organizations, which must prove their innocence even though, in many cases, the government has not specified wrongdoing. Moreover, they must do this without access to their own documents, computers, records, or other materials that might make their case. Making matters worse for these organizations, the government controls the information judges see and how they see it; investigators can label evidence confidential for national security reasons and then bring it before a court without the target being represented. This allows the government to present part of the picture most favorable to its case -- which targets are not allowed to confront -- while withholding information that might prove innocence. As one target, the Global Relief Foundation, put it, “In fact, [the Treasury Department] has stated in court that it will base its case on evidence GRF may never see.”3 This secret evidence has also made it difficult to understand the how the act is being applied, although the Bush administration appears to be interpreting its mandate broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • High Alert: the Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 45 (2003-2004) Issue 4 Article 3 March 2004 High Alert: The Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy Nina J. Crimm [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the National Security Law Commons Repository Citation Nina J. Crimm, High Alert: The Government's War on the Financing of Terrorism and Its Implication for Donors, Domestic Charitable Organizations, and Global Philanthropy, 45 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1341 (2004), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol45/iss4/3 Copyright c 2004 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr HIGH ALERT: THE GOVERNMENT'S WAR ON THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DONORS, DOMESTIC CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, AND GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY NINA J. CRIMM* ABSTRACT Within days after the September 11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. government extended its already existing commitment to combat terrorism. President Bush declared a financial war on terrorism, with the aim of depriving terrorists of their necessary financial support. He issued Executive Order 13,224, which ordered the blocking of assets of specially designated global terrorists.' Congress enacted legislation that not only fortified previously existing criminal and civil laws, but also added new ones for use in combating terrorists and terrorism. The Bush Administration dedicated resources to existing and newly created governmental structures that would be responsible for enforcing these laws and for waging the financial war on terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable and Humanitarian Organizations in the Network of International Terrorist Financing | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Congressional Testimony Charitable and Humanitarian Organizations in the Network of International Terrorist Financing by Matthew Levitt Aug 1, 2002 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony estimony before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on T International Trade and Finance I. INTRODUCTION The synchronized suicide attacks of September 11 highlighted the critical role financial and logistical support networks play in the operations of international terrorist organizations. According to financial profiles released by the FBI, the attacks cost between $303,672 and $500,000.1 Unfortunately, the network of international terrorist financing is both established and sophisticated. The investigative value of following the trail of terrorist financing has long been known. Then-FBI Director Louis Freeh testified before Congress in 1999 that a shortage of funds prevented the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center from being as devastating as it otherwise could have been. After his capture in 1995, Ramzi Yousef, the convicted mastermind behind the 1993 bombing and other attacks, admitted that the terrorists were unable to purchase sufficient material to build as large a bomb as they had intended because they were strapped for cash. In fact, the operation itself was rushed and carried out earlier than planned because the cell simply ran out of money. In the end, the terrorists' attempt to reclaim the deposit fee on the rental truck used to transport the bomb provided a key break in the case.2 The al Qaeda suicide hijackings underscored the post-blast, investigative utility of tracking the money trail, but they also drove home the critical need to preemptively deny terrorists the funds they need to conduct their attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Studies and Islamic Education in Contemporary Southeast Asia
    ISLAMIC STUDIES AND ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA i ii ISLAMIC STUDIES AND ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA Editors KAMARUZZAMAN BUSTAMAM-AHMAD PATRICK JORY YAYASAN ILMUWAN iii Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-In-Publication Data Islamic studies and Islamic education in contemporary Southeast Asia / editors: Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad, Patrick Jory ISBN 978-983-44372-3-7 (pbk.) 1. Islamic religious education--Southeast Asia. 2. Islam--Education--Southeast Asia. I. Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad. II. Jory, Patrick. 297.77 First Printed 2011 © 2011 Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad & Patrick Jory Publisher: Yayasan Ilmuwan D-0-3A, Setiawangsa Business Suites, Taman Setiawangsa, 54200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – for example, electronic, photocopy, recording – without prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed review. The opinions expressed in this publication is the personal views of the authors, and do not necessary reflect the opinion of the publisher. Layout and cover design: Hafizuldin bin Satar Font: Goudy Old Style Font size: 11 pt Printer: Gemilang Press Sdn Bhd iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS his book grew out of a three-day workshop jointly held by the Regional Studies TProgram, Walailak University, and the Department of Cross-Cultural and Re- gional Studies, Copenhagen University, in Nakhon Si Thammarat, southern Thai- land, in 2006. The theme of the workshop was, “Voices of Islam in Europe and Southeast Asia”. Its aim was to gather leading scholars in the fields of Islamic Stud- ies from diverse disciplinary backgrounds to discuss contemporary developments in the study of Islam and Muslim societies in these two regions.
    [Show full text]