<<

Association of Former Intelligence Officers From AFIO's The Intelligencer 7700 Leesburg Pike, Suite 324 Falls Church, Virginia 22043 Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies Web: www.afio.com , E-mail: [email protected] Volume 25 • Number 2 • Fall 2019 $15 single copy price mania pacified in 6 CE, Emperor appointed Varus to govern . Varus apparently contin- ued to use the harsh tactics that had worked in Syria, with much the same result: the Germanic tribes that When Intelligence Made a Difference had grudgingly accepted Roman dominion developed an intense hatred for their masters. — Ancient History — Varus was an administrator, not a trained soldier. But he had a trusted advisor who knew both German and Roman military tactics and had a superior knowl- edge of the local terrain. Deception in Arminius had been born a prince of a German by Robert M. Clark tribe, but had grown up as a hostage in , served with distinction in Rome’s military, and had been ntelligence and deception are inevitably inter- awarded . After Varus’ appointment twined. Intelligence collection – especially as governor of Germania, Arminius was dispatched to IHUMINT – depends on deception for its success. assist him in pacifying the German tribes. In turn, a profitable deception operation depends on Arminius, though, had a different agenda, and good intelligence about the opponent. And the key to he saw in Varus a perfect tool to execute it. Arminius’ success in military operations across history has often ambition was to become king of his tribe and been the result of deception. In few cases has that to expel Rome from its territory. If he could lead the been better illustrated than in the Battle of Teutoburg Cheruscis to a victory over the Roman legions, that just Forest in 9 C.E. between Roman legions and opposing might be possible. He began to secretly communicate German tribes. with the normally disorganized Germanic tribes and As the expanded into what is encourage them to unite against their common enemy. now , frequently there were set-piece battles Well placed and trusted, Arminius was able to where the ill-equipped German tribes faced the highly craft a deception that fit well with Varus’ inclination trained and disciplined Roman legions. These engage- to deal quickly and harshly with rebellion and his lack ments had a fairly predictable outcome: a slaughter. of military expertise. Arminius also was perfectly The opposing Rome had to find an asym- positioned to see that it was properly executed. metric response that would negate Roman military superiority, and they found it by virtue of superior The Deception intelligence. They got it because of the personal rela- tionship between two men; one Roman, one German. Deceptions depend on timing for success, and in 9 CE the timing was right. The Romans had trans- ferred eight of the eleven legions in Germania to deal Publius Quinctilius Varus with a rebellion in the , leaving the region Varus had risen through the Roman aristocracy lightly defended. as an effective administrator and was appointed Deceptions also succeed when the deceiver has governor of the Roman province of Africa in 8 BCE. a good understanding of what a leader is likely to do Two years later he became governor of Syria, where in a given situation. Arminius had that understand- he demonstrated the primary reasons for his effec- ing, thanks to having the perfect HUMINT source tiveness: heavy taxes and a direct, brutal approach – himself. He undoubtedly was aware of Varus’ his- to dealing with dissent. During the aftermath of an tory in handling revolt, and he crafted a story to fit insurrection in 4 BCE, he had occupied Jerusalem and that scenario. crucified 2,000 Jewish rebels, causing a major increase Arminius told Varus was that some tribes located in anti-Roman sentiment there. He then returned to in were in rebellion. He persuaded Rome and remained there until 6 CE. Varus to send his remaining three legions north to deal In the interim, Varus’ ally conducted a with the rebels. The route would take the legions two series of campaigns that expanded Rome’s control of day’s march through unfamiliar territory and directly Germania, east of the . When he declared Ger- through the Teutoburg forest.

Fall 2019 Intelligencer: Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies Page 41 All deceptions have their vulnerable points, as their movements were hampered by continuing and Arminius’ plan had a big one; but luck was with heavy rains. him. A pro-Roman Germanic military leader named The fight continued over the next two days and bore Arminius a grudge because of a family ended in another trap that Arminius had prepared next dispute. He learned of the plan and warned Varus not to Hill. The Roman escape route through a to trust Arminius. But because of his known hostility narrow area between the hill and a bog was blocked to Arminius, his warning lacked credibility, and Varus by trenches and an earthen wall, fortified by the Ger- ignored it. Instead, Arminius got the assignment to mans. A Roman attempt to storm the wall failed.1 march ahead and rally his Germanic allies to support Varus, seeing no possibility of escape, fell on his sword the Roman legions. in the approved manner, and many of his commanders did the same. (Military historians have long puzzled The Ambush as to why Roman tradition would demand that their commanders deprive their troops of leadership in In Sun Tzu’s Art of War, he describes six types of desperate situations, just when it is most needed.) terrain that must be dealt with in combat. One type The three legions were almost completely wiped out. he calls “entangling ground.” The side that occupies Only a few survivors escaped into the forest and made it first has a definite advantage. Not much is left of their way back to Roman lines. An asymmetric attack, Teutoburg forest today, but in 9 CE it was a perfect enabled by a well-crafted deception based on superior example of entangling ground. It was a dense wood, intelligence, effectively ended the Roman conquest not easily traversed even in good weather. And the of Germany. Autumn of 9 CE was a rainy one. The Roman legions entered the forest northeast of Osnabrück, on a road that was narrow and muddy. The legions were forced Robert M. Clark is the author of several books on out of battle formation into a line that extended for intelligence. His latest is Deception: Counterdeception 15-20 km, and Varus – possibly relying on Arminius and Counterintelligence with William L. Mitchell, CQ to scout ahead – failed to send reconnaissance parties Press, 2019. ahead of his forces. All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed are those Varus and his legions marched directly into the of the author and do not reflect the official positions or views of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or any other U.S. Gov- trap that Arminius had set for them near what is now ernment agency. Nothing in the contents should be construed Kalkriese. The Germanic forces attacked the dispersed as asserting or implying U.S. Government authentication of information or CIA endorsement of the author’s views. This legions from all sides with javelins and short spears. material has been reviewed by the CIA to prevent the disclosure Despite taking heavy losses, the Romans were able to of classified information. gather and create fortifications to hold off the Ger- mans for the night. The next day the legions broke out of the encircling enemy but took on more losses 1. Fergus M. Bordewich, “The Ambush That Changed History,” Smith- sonian Magazine, September 2006, https://www.smithsonianmag.com​ /history/the-ambush-that-changed-history-72636736/.

Page 42 Intelligencer: Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies Fall 2019