DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and Corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and Corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017) Invertebrate Zoology, 2020, 17(3): 267–290 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2020 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017). Contribution 2 Yu.N. Sundukov1, K.V. Makarov2 1 Federal Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 100-letiya Vladivostoka av. 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia. E-mail: yun- [email protected] 2 Zoology and Ecology Department, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Kibalchicha Street 6, Bld. 3, Moscow 129164 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: 214 comments are proposed for the 2nd edition of the first volume of the Catalog of Palaearctic Coleoptera, of which 189 are related to the systematic part of the catalog and 25 to its list of references. Distribution information is corrected for 10 taxa, three taxa are added, four excluded, and taxonomic information is refined for the remainder. 12 new publications are added, 2 references deleted, and data corrected for further 12 papers. How to cite this article: Sundukov Yu.N., Makarov K.V. 2020. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017). Contribution 2 // Invert. Zool. Vol.17. No.3. P.267–290. doi: 10.15298/invertzool.17.3.05 KEY WORDS: Taxonomic list; omitted taxa; added taxa; excluded taxa; taxonomic refinements; distribution. Жужелицы (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Дальнего Востока России: Дополнения и исправления к Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017). Сообщение 2 Ю.Н. Сундуков1, К.В. Макаров2 1 Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии Дальневосточного отделения РАН, просп. 100-летия Владивостока, 159, Владивосток, 690022 Россия. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Кафедра зоологии и экологии Института биологии и химии, Московский педагогический государственный университет, ул. Кибальчича 6, стр. 3, Москва 129164 Россия. E-mail: [email protected] РЕЗЮМЕ: Предложено 214 замечаний к 2-му изданию первого тома Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, из которых 189 касается систематической части каталога и 25 — его списка литературы. Для 10 таксонов исправлены сведения о распространении, три таксона добавлено, четыре — исключено, а для остальных уточнена таксономическая информация. Добавлено 12 новых публикаций, удалено 2 публикации, а для 12 публикаций приведены изменения. 268 Yu.N. Sundukov, K.V. Makarov Как цитировать эту статью: Sundukov Yu.N., Makarov K.V. 2020. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017). Contribution 2 // Invert. Zool. Vol.17. No.3. P.267–290. doi: 10.15298/invertzool.17.3.05 КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: таксономический список; добавленные таксоны, исключенные таксоны; таксономические уточнения; распространение. Introduction Results When preparing the catalog of ground bee- In total, 214 notes are included in the present tles of the Far East of Russia, many inaccuracies publication, of which 189 relate to the system- were found in the second edition of the first atic part. They contain a total of 10 corrections volume of the Catalog of Palaearctic Coleoptera to the distribution of taxa: 3 taxa are included as (Löbl, Löbl, 2017). Since this publication has new to the fauna of the Russian Far East, 4 are widely been used as a source of reference, also excluded from the list, and data on the distribu- serving as the basis for compiling many regional tion beyond the territory of the Far East are checklists, it seems advisable to pinpoint and corrected for further 3 taxa. Numerous taxonom- publish the errors we have spotted in order to ic refinements and changes are given as well, facilitate the future introduction of corrections. altogether concerning the following categories: This is the second contribution that also sub- – for 11 taxa of the generic rank, the type stantially supplements our first one (Sundukov, species are fixed; Makarov, 2019) which contained 108 distribu- – for 19 taxa of the generic rank, the genus of tion refinements and 70 taxonomic corrections the type species is fixed; for 155 Far Eastern taxa. – for 13 taxa, the name is corrected; – for 2 taxa, the names of the authors of the Methods original descriptions are corrected; – for 65 taxa, the page numbers containing the original descriptions are corrected; In the course of the study, we used only – for 96 taxa, information concerning the published data on the distribution of ground publication in which the original description of beetles in the Far East of Russia, supported by the taxon appeared was corrected. material from the collections of the Federal In the catalog’s list of references, 12 new Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodi- publications are added, 2 papers deleted as versity (Vladivostok), the Federal Pedagogical irrelevant, and corrections are made to further University (Moscow), and the Zoological Insti- 12 publications. tute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg). Corrections and addition to the Far East- To verify the taxonomic information, prima- ern taxa of Carabidae ry literature sources containing the descriptions of the relevant ground beetles taxa were con- p. 29. genus Trachypachus Motschulsky, sulted. All taxa included in the present paper are 1844: 86 type species Trachypachus transver- listed with reference to the pages they were salis Motschulsky, 1844; change the name from published on in the catalogue. transversalis to transversicollis (Motschulsky, In order not to increase the list of references, 1844). only sources used by us are included in this work, references to which being given in paren- p. 29: Trachypachus zetterstedti (Gyllenhal, theses, (). 1827), synonym transversalis Motschulsky, Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East. Contribution 2 269 1844: 86; change the name from transversalis to 539; change the reference to: Motschulsky, transversicollis (Motschulsky, 1844). 1859c: 539 [= Motschulsky, 1859d: 222]. The publication “Motschulsky, 1860e” is not in the p. 33: genus Leistus Frölich, 1799: 9; change references of Catalogue; article with a descrip- page to: 1799: 1. The description of the genus tion of Notiophilus aquaticus var. ?dauricus Leistus begins on page 1 and ends on page 8, was published twice in June 1859 (Motschul- with page 8 the description of L. testaceus sky, 1859c, d). begins (Frölich, 1799). p. 60: Notiophilus biguttatus Fabricius, 1779: p. 36: subgenus Leistus Frölich, 1799: 9 type 222 (Elaphrus); change page to: 1779: 231 species Carabus ferrugineus Linnaeus, 1758; (Fabricius, 1779). change page to: 1799: 1 (see previous post), and correct the type species to: Leistus testaceus p. 63: Pelophila borealis (Paykull, 1790), Frölich, 1799 (= Carabus ferrugineus Linnae- synonym costata Ménétriés, 1851: 49. The com- us, 1758). In the Catalogue, L. testaceus is the bination Pelophila costata Ménétriés, 1851 ap- junior synonym for L. ferrugineus (Farkač, peared for the first time in the catalog by Gem- 2017). minger and Harold (1868: 47) and later it was repeated in several papers (Csiki, 1927; Erwin, p. 38: Leistus (Leistus) niger Gebler, 1847, 2007; Löbl, Löbl, 2017). However, already synonym tibialis Motschulsky, 1860c: 98; Bänniger (1930: 101) doubted the assignment change page to: 1860c: 97 (Motschulsky, 1860c). of costata Ménétriés, 1851 to the genus Pelophi- la, while Kryzhanovskij et al. (1995) and p. 43: Nebria (Boreonebria) gyllenhali gyl- Bousquet (2012) omitted it from the list of lenhali (Schönherr, 1806), synonym schneideri synonyms of Pelophila borealis. We suggest Munster, 1933: 268; change page to: 1933: 267 deleting this taxon for the following reasons: 1) (Munster, 1933). Ménétriés’s work on page 49 describes Lypero- pherus costatus [= Pterostichus costatus p. 44: Nebria (Boreonebria) nivalis nivalis (Ménétriés, 1851)]; 2) of the genus Pelophila, (Paykull, 1790), synonym femoralis Motschul- only “Pelophila borealis Fabr.” is listed in this sky, 1859e: 541 [= Motschulsky, 1859f: 224]; publication (Ménétriés, 1851: 47); 3) in other change the reference to: Motschulsky, 1859c: publications of Ménétriés, this taxon was not 541 [= Motschulsky, 1859d: 224] (Motschul- described. sky, 1859c, d, e). p. 63: subgenus Calosoma Weber, 1801, p. 44: Nebria (Boreonebria) subdilatata synonym Acamegonia Lapouge, 1927: 4 type Motschulsky, 1844, synonym parvicollis Mots- species Calosoma glabratum Dejean, 1831; chulsky, 1859e: 540 [= Motschulsky, 1859f: change the reference, page and type species to: 224]; change the reference to: Motschulsky, 1924: 38 type species Acamegonia peregrina- 1859c: 540 [= Motschulsky, 1859d: 224] (Mo- trix incerta Lapouge, 1924 (= Calosoma sponsa tschulsky, 1859c, d, e). Casey, 1897) (Lapouge, 1924, 1927). p. 51: subgenus Nebria Latreille, 1812, syn- p. 63: subgenus Calosoma Weber, 1810, onym Helobia Stephens, 1828: 16; change the synonym Calipera Bedel, 1881: 15; change the reference and page to: 1827: 45. A description name Calipera and reference to: Callipera Be- of Helobia is given in the key (p. 45) and del, 1879a: 15 (Bedel, 1879, 1881). diagnosis (p. 60–61) (Stephens, 1827). p. 63: subgenus Calosoma Weber, 1810, p. 60: Notiophilus aquaticus (Linnaeus, synonym Calister Reitter, 1896: 41; change the 1758), synonym dauricus Motschulsky, 1860e: reference and page to: 1896b: 15 (Reitter, 1896). 270 Yu.N. Sundukov, K.V. Makarov p. 64: subgenus Calosoma
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Viability of Ground Beetle Populations in Fragmented Heathlands
    Viability of ground beetle populations in fragmented heathlands Henk de Vries Promotoren: Dr. L. Brussaard Hoogleraar in de Bodembiologie Dr. W. van Delden Hoogleraar in de Populatiegenetica Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Co-promotor: Dr. Th. S. van Dijk Universitair docent Biologisch Station Wijster Viability of ground beetle populations in fragmented heathlands H. H. de Vries Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van de Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Dr. C. M. Karssen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 30 oktober 1996 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula. t/)H cs"ic>zy>b LANDïîOUVV UXI VERSIT3T T ISBN 90-5485-586-X Printed on Challenger, 100% recycled paper This thesis has been accomplished at: Biological Station Wijster Wageningen Agricultural University Kampsweg 27 9418 PD Wijster The Netherlands Abstract Numbers of ground beetle species that are characteristic for heathlands were negatively associated with area, whereas this relationship was not found for the total number of ground beetle species or for unspecialised ground beetle species. In particular the number of heathland species with low dispersal ability was strongly related to area. Transplant experiments showed that some heathland species with low dispersal ability experienced reduced habitat quality in small habitats, whereas for others at least part of the unoccupied areas were of sufficient quality for successful reproduction. From the presence of occupied as well as unoccupied habitats and from knowledge on its possibilities for dispersal, it is inferred that Pterostichus lepidus lives in metapopulations with continuously and discontinuously occupied patches. Using allozymes, high levels of genetic variation were found in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 573: 387–512 (2016)Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada 387 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada Reginald P. Webster1 1 24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E3C 1X1 Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 3 February 2016 | Accepted 29 February 2016 | Published 24 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/34473062-17C2-4122-8109-3F4D47BB5699 Citation: Webster RP (2016) Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 387–512. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 Abstract All 3,062 species of Coleoptera from 92 families known to occur in New Brunswick, Canada, are re- corded, along with their author(s) and year of publication using the most recent classification framework. Adventive and Holarctic species are indicated. There are 366 adventive species in the province, 12.0% of the total fauna. Keywords Checklist, Coleoptera, New Brunswick, Canada Introduction The first checklist of the beetles of Canada by Bousquet (1991) listed 1,365 species from the province of New Brunswick, Canada. Since that publication, many species have been added to the faunal list of the province, primarily from increased collection efforts and
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Identification, and Phylogeny of the African and Madagascan Species of the Tiger Beetle Genus Chaetodera Jeannel 1946 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 9-2-2011 Taxonomy, identification, and phylogeny of the African and Madagascan species of the tiger beetle genus Chaetodera Jeannel 1946 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Jonathan R. Mawdsley Smithsonian Institution, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Mawdsley, Jonathan R., "Taxonomy, identification, and phylogeny of the African and Madagascan species of the tiger beetle genus Chaetodera Jeannel 1946 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)" (2011). Insecta Mundi. 703. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/703 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0191 Taxonomy, identification, and phylogeny of the African and Madagascan species of the tiger beetle genus Chaetodera Jeannel 1946 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Jonathan R. Mawdsley Department of Entomology, MRC 187 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, USA Date of Issue: September 2, 2011 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Jonathan R. Mawdsley Taxonomy, identification, and phylogeny of the African and Madagascan species of the tiger beetle genus Chaetodera Jeannel 1946 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Insecta Mundi 0191: 1-13 Published in 2011 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 WNAN 2007 New PAGE Template
    Western North American Naturalist 81(1), © 2021, pp. 54–62 Cold tolerance of mountain stoneflies (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from the high Rocky Mountains SCOTT HOTALING1,*,†, ALISHA A. SHAH2,†, MICHAEL E. DILLON3, J. JOSEPH GIERSCH4, LUSHA M. TRONSTAD5, DEBRA S. FINN6, H. ARTHUR WOODS2, AND JOANNA L. KELLEY1 1School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 2Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 3Department of Zoology and Physiology and Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 4Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, West Glacier, MT 5Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 6Department of Biology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO ABSTRACT.—How aquatic insects cope with cold temperatures is poorly understood. This is particularly true for high-elevation species, which often experience a seasonal risk of freezing. In the Rocky Mountains, nemourid stoneflies (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) are a major component of mountain stream biodiversity and are typically found in streams fed by glaciers and snowfields, which are rapidly receding due to climate change. Predicting the effects of climate change on mountain stoneflies is difficult because their thermal physiology is largely unknown. We investigated cold tolerance of several alpine stoneflies (Lednia tumana, Lednia tetonica, and Zapada spp.) from the Rocky Mountains, USA. We mea- sured the supercooling point (SCP) and tolerance to ice enclosure of late-instar nymphs collected from a range of thermal regimes. SCPs varied among species and populations, with the lowest SCP measured for nymphs from an alpine pond, which was much more likely to freeze solid in winter than flowing streams.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    Fifth National Report of Japan to the Convention on Biological Diversity Government of Japan March 2014 Contents Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 Biodiversity: the current situation, trends and threats 7 1.1 Importance of biodiversity 7 (1) Characteristics of biodiversity in Japan from the global perspective 7 (2) Biodiversity that supports life and livelihoods 9 (3) Japan causing impacts on global biodiversity 10 (4) The economic valuation of biodiversity 11 1.2 Major changes to the biodiversity situation and trends 12 (1) The current situation of ecosystems 12 (2) The current situation of threatened wildlife 17 (3) Impacts of the Great East Japan Earthquake on biodiversity 19 1.3 The structure of the biodiversity crisis 21 (1) The four crises of biodiversity 21 (2) Japan Biodiversity Outlook (JBO) 22 1.4 The impacts of changes in biodiversity on ecosystem services, socio-economy, and culture 24 (1) Changes in the distribution of medium and large mammals and the expansion of conflicts 24 (2) Alien species 24 (3) Impacts of changes in the global environment on biodiversity 26 1.5 Future scenarios for biodiversity 28 (1) Impacts of the global warming 28 (2) The impacts of ocean acidification on coral reefs 29 (3) The forecasted expansion in the distribution of sika deer (Cervus nippon ) 30 (4) Second crisis (caused by reduced human activities) 30 Chapter 2 Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Mainstreaming Biodiversity 32 2.1 Background to the formulation of the National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan and its development
    [Show full text]
  • Ent21 3 229 256 Sharova.Pmd
    Russian Entomol. J. 21(3): 229256 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2012 Æèçíåííûå ôîðìû è àäàïòèâíàÿ ðàäèàöèÿ ëè÷èíîê æóæåëèö (Coleoptera: Carabidae) ìèðîâîé ôàóíû Life forms and adaptive radiation of ground beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the World fauna È.Õ. Øàðîâà, Ê.Â. Ìàêàðîâ I.Kh. Sharova, K.V. Makarov Ìîñêîâñêèé ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò, êàôåäðà çîîëîãèè è ýêîëîãèè, óë.Êèáàëü÷è÷à, ä. 6, êîðï. 5, Ìîñêâà 129278, Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Moscow State Pedagogical University, Department of Zoology & Ecology, Kibalchicha str. 6, build. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: ëè÷èíêè, æóæåëèöû, ìîðôîëîãèô, æèçíåííûå ôîðìû, àäàïòàöèè, ñïåêòðû æèçíåííûõ ôîðì, ïàðàëëåëèçì. KEY WORDS: larvae, Carabidae, morphology, life forms, adaptations, life form spectra, parallelism. ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Ïðåäëîæåíà èåðàðõè÷åñêàÿ ñèñòåìà âî÷íû è ñâîäèëèñü ê îïèñàíèþ îòäåëüíûõ âèäîâ. æèçíåííûõ ôîðì ëè÷èíîê Carabidae ìèðîâîé ôàóíû Îáîáùåíèå ýòèõ ñâåäåíèé ñòàëî âîçìîæíûì ëèøü ñ íà îñíîâå ñèíòåçà îðèãèíàëüíûõ è îïóáëèêîâàííûõ ïîÿâëåíèåì ïåðâûõ ñâîäîê ïî ìîðôîëîãèè è ñèñòå- äàííûõ ïî èõ ìîðôîëîãèè, ñèñòåìàòèêå è ýêîëîãèè. ìàòèêå ëè÷èíîê Carabidae [van Emden, 1942; Jeannel, Íîâàÿ ñèñòåìà æèçíåííûõ ôîðì ëè÷èíîê Carabidae 1941, 1942; Larsson, 1941].  Ðîññèè ïåðâûå îïðåäå- îòëè÷àåòñÿ îò ïðåæíåé [Øàðîâà, 1981] ââåäåíèåì ëèòåëè ëè÷èíîê æóæåëèö áûëè ñîñòàâëåíû Çíîéêî äîïîëíèòåëüíûõ êàòåãîðèé.  ñèñòåìó âêëþ÷åíî 6 [1929], Ãèëÿðîâûì, Øàðîâîé [1954] è Øàðîâîé êëàññîâ è 45 ãðóïï æèçíåííûõ ôîðì, õàðàêåòðèçóþ- [1958, 1964]. Íàêîïëåííûå ñâåäåíèÿ î ëè÷èíêàõ ùèõñÿ êîìïëåêñîì ìîðôîëîãè÷åñêèõ è ïîâåäåí÷åñ- æóæåëèö ïîçâîëèëè èçó÷àòü èõ àäàïòèâíîå ìíîãî- êèõ àäàïòàöèé. Íà îñíîâå íîâîé ñèñòåìû æèçíåííûõ îáðàçèå. Âïåðâûå íåñêîëüêî ìîðôî-ýêîëîãè÷åñêèõ ôîðì ëè÷èíîê Carabidae ïðåäëîæåíà ãèïîòåçà èõ àäàï- òèïîâ ïî÷âîîáèòàþùèõ ëè÷èíîê æóæåëèö âûäåëèë òèâíîé ðàäèàöèè îò ìàëîñïåöèàëèçèðîâàííûõ çîîôà- Ì.Ñ.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruzickova 2014
    Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Přírodov ědecká fakulta Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato ř Bc. Jana R ůži čková Porovnání vlivu AEO "úhor" a "neošet řovaný pás" na carabidofaunu polí Diplomová práce v oboru Zoologie Vedoucí práce: RNDr. Milan Veselý, Ph.D. Olomouc 2014 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatn ě pod vedením RNDr. Milana Veselého, Ph.D. a všechny citované zdroje uvádím v seznamu literatury. V Olomouci 30. dubna 2014 ………………………… podpis Pod ěkování V prvé řad ě bych cht ěla pod ěkovat RNDr. Milanovi Veselému, PhD. za vedení práce, kritický pohled a cenné rady. M ůj obrovský dík pat ří taktéž RNDr. Ivanu H. Tufovi, PhD. a Mgr. Honzovi Šipošovi za pomoc se statistickou analýzou. Nesmím opomenout ani všechny sb ěratele dat, svoji rodinu a „kolíky“, bez kterých by se mi pracovalo jen velmi ztuha. A nakonec d ěkuji pardan ům za podporu ve chvílích nejtemn ějších a dugong ům za to, že jsou ozdobou naší planety. Růži čková, J. (2014): Porovnání vlivu AEO "úhor" a "neošet řovaný pás" na carabidofaunu polí. Sou časná zem ědělská politika Evropské unie podporuje opat ření na zvýšení biodiverzity a heterogenity agroekosystém ů. Cílem této práce bylo reáln ě zhodnotit smysluplnost dvou agroenvironmentálních opat ření (úhoru a chemicky neošet řeného pásu plodiny) na st řevlíkovité brouky v polích. Výzkum probíhal b ěhem let 2009 – 2011 na polích na Znojemsku, Královéhradecku a Vyškovsku. Pomocí padacích zemních pastí umíst ěných ve čty řech liniích v různých vzdálenostech od opat ření bylo celkov ě uloveno 58 805 jedinc ů st řevlíkovitých v 99 druzích. Druhová bohatost a po četnost spole čenstva byla nejvyšší v opatření (bez ohledu na typ) a klesala sm ěrem do pole.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Habitat Fragmentation
    REVIEW Eur. J.Entomol. 98: 127-132, 2001 ISSN 1210-5759 Carabid beetles (Coleóptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review Ja r i NIEMELÁ Department ofEcology and Systematics, PO Box 17, FIN-00014 University ofHelsinki, Finland e-mail:[email protected] Key words. Carabids, conservation, dispersal, forests, habitat fragmentation, habitat heterogeneity, metapopulations, species richness, generalists, specialists Abstract. I review the effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and examine whether the taxon could be used as an indicator of fragmentation. Related to this, I study the conservation needs of carabids. The reviewed studies showed that habitat fragmentation affects carabid assemblages. Many species that require habitat types found in interiors of frag­ ments are threatened by fragmentation. On the other hand, the species composition of small fragments of habitat (up to a few hec­ tares) is often altered by species invading from the surroundings. Recommendations for mitigating these adverse effects include maintenance of large habitat patches and connections between them. Furthermore, landscape homogenisation should be avoided by maintaining heterogeneity ofhabitat types. It appears that at least in the Northern Hemisphere there is enough data about carabids for them to be fruitfully used to signal changes in land use practices. Many carabid species have been classified as threatened. Mainte­ nance of the red-listed carabids in the landscape requires species-specific or assemblage-specific measures. INTRODUCTION HABITAT FRAGMENTATION AND CARABID ASSEMBLAGES Destruction and fragmentation of habitats, overkill, introduction of alien species, and cascading effects of Effects of fragmentation on carabid assemblages species extinctions have been labelled the “evil quartet”, Habitat fragmentation is the partitioning of a con­ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz
    Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Die Käfer Schleswig-Holsteins Rote Liste Band 2 Herausgeber: Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (MLUR) Erarbeitung durch: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Hamburger Chaussee 25 24220 Flintbek Tel.: 0 43 47 / 704-0 www.llur.schleswig-holstein.de Ansprechpartner: Arne Drews (Tel. 0 43 47 / 704-360) Autoren: Stephan Gürlich Roland Suikat Wolfgang Ziegler Titelfoto: Macroplea mutica (RL 1), Langklauen-Rohrblattkäfer, 7 mm, Familie Blattkäfer, Unterfamilie Schilfkäfer galt bereits als ausgestorben. Die Art konnte aber in neuerer Zeit in den Seegraswiesen der Orther Reede auf Fehmarn wieder nachgewiesen werden. Die Käferart vollzieht ihren gesamten Lebenszyklus vollständig submers und gehört gleichzeitig zu den ganz wenigen Insektenarten, die im Salzwasser leben können. Dieses einzige an der schleswig-hol- steinischen Ostseeküste bekannte Vorkommen ist in den dortigen Flachwasserzonen durch Wassersport gefährdet. (Foto: R. Suikat) Herstellung: Pirwitz Druck & Design, Kronshagen Dezember 2011 ISBN: 978-3-937937-54-0 Schriftenreihe: LLUR SH – Natur - RL 23 Band 2 von 3 Diese Broschüre wurde auf Recyclingpapier hergestellt. Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der schleswig- holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwerbung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahl- kampf zum Zwecke der Wahlwerbung verwendet werden. Auch ohne zeit- lichen Bezug zu einer bevorstehenden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Partei- nahme der Landesregierung zu Gunsten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden könnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu verwenden.
    [Show full text]