The Foundation, Occupation, and Abandonment of Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Foundation, Occupation, and Abandonment of Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 RECEIVED OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior DEC 071993 National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Foundation, Occupation, and Abandonment of Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 C. Form Prepared by name/title Dr. Chester B. DePratter / Research Associate Professor organization S.C. Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology date Dec. 14 r 1992 street & number 1321 Pendleton Street_________________ telephone (803)777-8170 city or town Columbia state South Carolina zip code 29208___________ D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) "Utd V . Ll, M/2/T Signature and title yf certifying official Date Marv W. Edmonds. Deputy SHPQ r S.C. Department of Archives & History, Columbia, S.C, State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing~ in the National Register. Signature oHlie Keeper Date of Action Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 South Carolina Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the foilowing information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Numbers E. Statement of Historic Contexts 1-6 (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) F. Associated Property Types 1-3 (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements.) G. Geographical Data 1 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) I. Major Bibliographical References 1-3 (List major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or other, specifying repository.) Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127- and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NFS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-4018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number —E— Page _J—— Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 E. Statement of Historic Contexts The first mention of the peoples who later became Yamasee Indians can be found in accounts describing the earliest European expeditions into the area now occupied by the states of South Carolina and Georgia. The Ayllon expedition, which attempted to settle somewhere along the South Atlantic coast in 1526, may have encountered the Indians of Guale on the coast of present-day Georgia, although there is currently some dispute concerning precisely where Ayllon and his colonists landed (Quattiebaum 1956; Lyon 1990; Michie 1991). If the peoples of "Gualdape" visited by Ayllon were the Guale, then this is our first recorded reference to these peoples by a European. Sixteenth century documents indicate that the Guale were a large society composed of approximately 4-6000 people living in about 35 towns at that time (Swanton 1922:81). The Guale were coastal dwellers whose way of life was well adapted to exploitation of the coastal marshes and tidal creeks of their homeland. Their hunting and collecting for food was supplemented by agriculture. In 1565, Spanish commander Pedro Menendez de Aviles defeated a group of Frenchmen who were attempting to settle in northeast Florida, and the next year he traveled north along the coast from his stronghold at St. Augustine in an effort to familiarize himself with the region and to learn more of its native populations. He visited the Guale during that journey and decided that the Indians he encountered needed to be taught about the Catholic faith. Although there were no missionaries placed among the Guale for another 15 years, by 1597 the Spanish had an extensive mission system in place along the Guale coast composed of 5 missions and a number of substations (Lanning 1935:72). Hernando De Soto, another Spanish explorer, was the first to visit the Indians of Tama, in interior Georgia. De Soto was a hardened veteran who had participated in the conquest of Panama, Nicaragua, and Peru. In 1536 he was appointed Governor of Cuba and was also given the right to explore and settle the land called "La Florida" which stretched from Mexico to eastern Canada. In May, 1539, De Soto and his force landed at Tampa Bay, and over the next year they traveled north into what is today central Georgia. In passing through this region, this Spanish expedition encountered the chiefdoms of Ichisi (on the Ocmulgee River) and Altamaha/Ocute or Tama (on the Oconee River) (Hudson, DePratter, and Smith 1989). These related but distinct groups lived in towns and villages along their respective rivers and their tributaries. Chiefs and their principal advisors resided in large towns which were the centers of religious and political activities within each chiefdom. Most of the remainder of the population resided in smaller villages and hamlets scattered among their agricultural fields in the river bottoms and uplands. Total population of Tama and Ichisi was probably around 5000 to 7000. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-4018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number —E— Page _2—— Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684-1715 During the first half of the 17th century, the Guale and the Tama fared quite differently in the face of an ever-growing European presence in the region. The Spanish continued their efforts to missionize the Guale and encouraged them to lead settled lives in large, permanent villages surrounding the mission stations. Traditional Guale beliefs and values were belittled by the Spanish who intended to convert these "heathens" into good Catholics. The people of Tama, on the other hand, had little contact with the Spanish during the early decades of the 17th century. Only a few small military expeditions passed through Tama, and none of these stayed long or appears to have had any significant impact on the peoples that they encountered. Beginning in about 1660, conditions began to change. At about that time, the Westo Indians settled on the Savannah River near present-day Augusta, Georgia. The Westo moved into the area from the north with guns obtained from Virginia traders. Using these guns, the Westo began raiding neighboring groups, including the Guale who did not have guns because the Spanish never established a trade system to distribute goods to their Indian allies. By 1661, Guale refugees had settled around the walls of St. Augustine in an effort to escape the attacks of the Westo, who the Spanish called "Chichumecos" (Crane 1928:5-6; Lanning 1935:209). The Westo staged raids against all of their neighbors. When the English arrived in 1670 to settle their new Carolina Colony, the coastal Indians of that province professed great fear of the Westo who were thought to be cannibalistic. In reality, the Westo were taking captives not for cannibalism, but so they could be sold as slaves in the Virginia
Recommended publications
  • The Indian Trade War Reconsidered: Morris on Ivers
    Larry E. Ivers. This Torrent of Indians: War on the Southern Frontier, 1715-1728. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2016. 292 pp. $24.95, paper, ISBN 978-1-61117-606-3. Reviewed by Michael Morris Published on H-SC (September, 2016) Commissioned by David W. Dangerfield (University of South Carolina - Salkehatchie) If South Carolina’s Yamasee War is ever given tribes and forgotten forts. His secondary works a subtitle, it could rightly be called the Great Indi‐ run the gamut from Verner Crane's 1959 classic, an Trade War. Larry Ivers, a lawyer by training The Southern Frontier to William Ramsey's 2008 with a military background, notes in his preface work, The Yamasee War. that his intent was to fll a void in the history of The frst three chapters set the stage for con‐ the Yamasee War and to provide a more detailed flict by discussing the Indian agents and traders analysis of the military operations of the war. To who caused the crisis by enslavement of debtor that end, he clearly succeeds in recreating the sto‐ Indians, and one of its strengths is naming people ry of a colony at war aggravated by professional who are otherwise shadowy fgures in backcoun‐ Indian traders who trafficked in Indian slaves to try history. The Yamasee leadership clearly pay their debts. Ivers reveals an incredibly de‐ warned traders Samuel Warner and William Bray tailed account of the debacle and this detailed of a planned murder of all traders and an attack analysis is both a major strength and a minor on the colony if the South Carolina government weakness of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine Andrea Paige White College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2002 Living on the Periphery: A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine andrea Paige White College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation White, andrea Paige, "Living on the Periphery: A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine" (2002). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626354. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-whwd-r651 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIVING ON THE PERIPHERY: A STUDY OF AN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY YAMASEE MISSION COMMUNITY IN COLONIAL ST. AUGUSTINE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Andrea P. White 2002 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of aster of Arts Author Approved, November 2002 n / i i WJ m Norman Barka Carl Halbirt City Archaeologist, St. Augustine, FL Theodore Reinhart TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 2 Creolization Models in Historical Archaeology 4 Previous Archaeological Work on the Yamasee and Significance of La Punta 7 PROJECT METHODS 10 Historical Sources 10 Research Design and The City of St.
    [Show full text]
  • AP US History Opportunity and Oppression in Colonial Society 1
    AP US History Opportunity and Oppression in Colonial Society 1. The system of indentured labor used during the Colonial period had which of the following effects? A. It enabled England to deport most criminals. B. It enabled poor people to seek opportunity in America. C. It delayed the establishment of slavery in the South until about 1750. D. It facilitated the cultivation of cotton in the South. E. It instituted social equality. 2. Indentured servants were usually A. slaves who had been emancipated by their masters B. free blacks forced to sell themselves into slavery by economic conditions. C. paroled prisoners bound to a lifetime of service in the colonies D. persons who voluntarily bound themselves to labor for a set number of years in return for transportation in the colonies. E. the sons and daughters of slaves. 3. The headright system adopted in the Virginia colony A. determined the eligibility of a settler for voting and holding office. B. toughened the laws applying to indentured servants. C. gave 50 acres of land to anyone who would transport himself to the colony. D. encouraged the development of urban centers. E. prohibited the settlement of single men and women in the colony. 4. Of the African slaves brought to the New World by Europeans from 1492 through 1770, the vast majority were shipped to A Virginia B the Carolinas C the Caribbean D Georgia E Florida 5. A majority of the early English migrants to the Chesapeake were A. Families with young children B. Indentured servants C. Wealthy gentlemen D. Merchants and craftsmen E.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Indian Interaction in Spanish Florida
    DOCUMEPT RESUME ED 320 845 SO 030 009 AUTHOR Landers, Jane TITLE Black/Indian Interaction in SpanishFlorida. PUB DATE 24 Mar 90 NOTE 25p.; Paper presented at the AnnualMeeting of the Organization of American Historians(Washington, DC, March 24, 1990). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) --Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian History; *Black History; *Colonial History (United States); Higher Education; *Indigenous Populations; Secondary Education; *Slavery; State History IDENTIFIERS *Florida ABSTRACT The history of the lives of non-white peoples in the United States largely has been neglected although the Spanish bureaucrats kept meticulous records of the Spanish Mission period in Florida. These records represent an important source for the cultural history of these groups and offer new perspectives on the tri-racial nature of frontier society. Africans as well as Indians played significant roles in Spain's settlement of the Americas. On arrival in Florida the Africans ran away from the," captors to Indian villages. The Spanish, perceiving an alliance of non-white groups, sought to separate them, and passed special legislation forbidding living or trading between the two groups. There were continuous episodes of violence by the Indians who resisted Spanish labor and tribute demands, efforts to convert them, and changes in their social practices. Villages were reduced to mission sites where they could more readily supply the Spaniards with food and labor. Indian and black surrogates were used to fight the English and helped build the massive stone fort at St. Augustine. The end of the Spanish Mission system came with the war of 1700, English forces from the Carolinas raided mission sites killing thousands of Indians and taking many into slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Grade Sample Social Studies Learning Plan
    th 8 Grade Sample Social Studies Learning Plan Big Idea/ Topic American Indians & Exploration in Georgia Connecting Theme/Enduring Understanding: Location: The student will understand that location affects a society’s economy, culture, and development. Movement/Migration: The student will understand that the movement or migration of people and ideas affects all societies involved. Individuals, Groups, Institutions: The student will understand that the actions of individuals, groups, and/or institutions affect society through intended and unintended consequences. Essential Question: How were the lives of American Indians impacted by European exploration? Standard Alignment SS8H1 Evaluate the impact of European exploration and settlement on American Indians in Georgia. a. Describe the characteristics of American Indians living in Georgia at the time of European contact; to include culture, food, weapons/tools, and shelter. Connection to Literacy Standards for Social Studies and Social Studies Matrices L6-8RHSS5: Describe how a text presents information (e.g., sequentially, comparatively, casually). L6-8RHSS7: Integrate visual information (e.g., in charts, graphs, photographs, videos, or maps) with other information in print and digital texts L6-8WHST7: Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration L6-8WHST4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. L6-8WHST9: Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis reflection, and research Information Processing Skills– 1 (compare similarities and differences) , 9 (construct charts and tables) Instructional Design *This lesson has a flexible timeline and will cross over several days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yamasee War: 1715 - 1717
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Archaeology Month Posters Institute of 10-2015 The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archmonth_poster Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in 2015. South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina. Archaeology Month Poster - The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717, 2015. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2015. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2015 by University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Poster is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Archaeology Month Posters by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE YAMASEE WAR: 1715 - 1717 Thomas Nairne, “A map of South Carolina shewing the settlements of the English, French, & Indian nations from Charles Town to the River Missisipi [sic].” 1711. From Edward Crisp, “A compleat description of the province of Carolina in 3 parts.” Photo courtesy of Library of Congress 24th Annual South Carolina Archaeology Month October 2015 USC • South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology • 1321 Pendleton Street • Columbia S
    [Show full text]
  • Wiest Must Have War and Society List
    War and Society Graduate Reading List Drs. Allison Abra, Mao Lin, Heather M. Stur, Kenneth Swope, Susannah Ural, Andrew A. Wiest, & Kyle F. Zelner NOTE: In addition to the titles listed below, students should familiarize themselves with the important journals in the field, especially The Journal of Military History and War & Society, in addition to relevant articles in more general history journals. VALID DATES: Approved for students entering program in 2010 and forward (or by agreement with faculty advisor). * designates a classic, must-read, essential work. (67 total) ************************************************************************************* HISTORIOGRAPHICAL WORKS: The following—required—historiographical works offer students a firm understanding of current issues in the field of war and society: *Black, Jeremy. Rethinking Military History. New York: Routledge, 2004. *Citino, Robert M. “Military Histories Old and New: A Reintroduction.” American Historical Review 112, no. 4 (2007): 1070-1090. *Grenier, John. “Recent Trends in the Historiography on Warfare in the Colonial Period (1607-1765)” History Compass 8 no. 4 (2010): 358-367. *Hughes, Matthew and William Philpott, eds. Palgrave Advances in Modern Military Histor. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2007. *Kohn, Richard H., “The Social History of the American Soldier: A Review and Prospectus for Research.” American Historical Review 86, no. 3 (1981): 553-67. *Lee, Wayne E. “Early American Ways of War: A New Reconnaissance, 1600-1815.” The Historical Journal 44, no. 1 (2001): 269-289. *Lee, Wayne E. “Mind and Matter - Cultural Analysis in American Military History: A Look at the State of the Field.” Journal of American History 93, no. 4 (2007): 1116-1142. *Linn, Brian McAllister. “‘The American Way of War’ Revisited.” Journal of Military History 66, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and the Socio-Political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History 12-10-2018 Demons of Discord: Violence and the Socio-political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776 Corrie N. Hand-Stephenson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Recommended Citation Hand-Stephenson, Corrie N., "Demons of Discord: Violence and the Socio-political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/71 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEMONS OF DISCORD: VIOLENCE AND THE SOCIO-POLITICAL GROWTH OF COLONIAL SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA, 1690-1776 by CORRIE HAND-STEPHENSON Under the Direction of Charles Steffen, PhD ABSTRACT Life in the colonial American south was filled with brutality and inequality. Whether it was the violence of slavery and colonial expansion or the inherent inequalities of gender relations, violence and oppression permeated nearly every facet of life. This dissertation will look critically at the development of what I am calling a culture of violence in the colonies of Georgia and South Carolina. By studying the ways in which violence effected family, social, and political interactions, my work argues that the crucible of social, racial, and political issues of these two colonies created a culture in which violence or the threat of violence permeated most human interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Pageant, Fifteenth Edition
    Chapter 2 The Planting of English rAmerica 1500–1733 . For I shall yet live to see it [Virginia] an Inglishe nation. Sir Walter raleigh, 1602 s the seventeenth century dawned, scarcely Roman Catholic Church in the 1530s, launching the a hundred years after Columbus’s momentous English Protestant Reformation. Catholics bat- Alandfall, the face of much of the New World had already tled Protestants for decades, and the religious balance been profoundly transformed. European crops and live- of power seesawed. But after the Protestant Elizabeth stock had begun to alter the very landscape, touching ascended to the English throne in 1558, Protestantism off an ecological revolution that would reverberate for became dominant in England, and rivalry with Catho- centuries to come. From Tierra del Fuego in the south lic Spain intensified. to Hudson Bay in the north, disease and armed con- Ireland, which nominally had been under English quest had cruelly winnowed and disrupted the native rule since the twelfth century, became an early scene of peoples. Several hundred thousand enslaved Africans that rivalry. The Catholic Irish sought help from Catho- toiled on Caribbean and Brazilian sugar plantations. lic Spain to throw off the yoke of the new Protestant Eng- From Florida and New Mexico southward, most of the lish queen. But Spanish aid never amounted to much; New World lay firmly within the grip of imperial Spain. in the 1570s and 1580s, Elizabeth’s troops crushed the But north of Mexico, America in 1600 remained Irish uprising with terrible ferocity, inflicting unspeak- largely unexplored and effectively unclaimed by Euro- able atrocities upon the native Irish people.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren R. Hofstra's Book, the Planting of New Virginia: Settlement
    Warren R. Hofstra’s book, The Planting of New Virginia: Settlement and Landscape in the Shenandoah Valley is the product of years of assiduous scholarship. Hofstra traces the evolution of the Shenandoah Valley during the eighteenth century. In the early 1700s, the valley was unsettled but contested by Native Americans. Beginning in the 1730s, European settlement created a region of dispersed private farms. The Seven Years War stimulated the economy of Winchester, which became a garrison town, and paved the way for the transition to a town and country landscape that produced wheat for the Atlantic commercial economy. In charting these changes, Hofstra demonstrates what was unique about the valley but also how its pattern of evolution was replicated as Americans moved westward during the nineteenth century. To some degree, similar developments occurred in South Carolina. In 1731, shortly after the disastrous Yamasee war, the English Board of Trade authorized the colony’s first royal governor, Robert Johnson, to establish townships along colony’s frontier. Johnson and his superiors envisioned a landscape of towns and small family farms, a protective barrier against Indian threats on the frontier and slave rebellions by the black majority in the Carolina lowcountry. Subsidized by the colony’s government, the region attracted German Lutherans, French Huguenots, and Welsh Baptists. Situated below the fall line, this first layer of backcountry settlement eventually became known as the middlecountry. The purposes of South Carolina’s inland towns, as well as their ethnic and religious diversity, mirrored the early settlement of the Shenandoah Valley described by Hofstra. In addition to concerns for South Carolina’s security, the Board of Trade was alarmed that English settlement would be hemmed in by the French, who threatened to 2 extend their reach from Canada to Louisiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Gpb Textbook Unit 2 Final.Pdf
    OUR STATE and OUR NATION UNIT Georgia Studies 2 GEORGIA EVENTS EVENTS ELSEWHERE Before it Was Georgia B.C. 12,000 People first arrive in North America CHAPTER 3 10,000 10,000 Let’s Talk History People arrive in the Paleo-Indian period begins; Southeast animals domesticated in Near Why Study History? East How to Do History The Dating Game 8000 Archaic period begins; agriculture appears in Near East CHAPTER 4 Georgia’s Prehistoric Past 4000 Unearthing Clues to Georgia’s Civilization develops in Near Prehistoric Past East; beginning of recorded history Georgia’s First Inhabitants 2500 CHAPTER 5 Egyptians build Great Pyramid Europe Discovers at Giza the New World The Age of Discovery 2000 Pottery first made in North Spain Comes to the Southeast America (near Augusta) England Comes to North America 1000 Woodland period begins A.D. Birth of Christ 1000 Mississippian period begins; Leif Ericson explores Newfoundland 1492 Columbus lands in West Indies 1498 John Cabot explores North American coast, possibly as far south as Florida 1513 Ponce de Leon becomes first European to land on North American mainland 1526 Ayllon colony briefly settles on Georgia coast 1540 De Soto expedition first to explore Georgia’s interior 1565 Spanish destroy French Fort Caroline, build St. Augustine 1566 Spanish missionaries first arrive in Guale (Georgia) 1597 Juanillo rebellion 1607 Jamestown, Virginia, becomes England’s first permanent settlement in America 1619 West Africans brought to Virginia 1663 King Charles II creates colony of Carolina 1690 Spain withdraws from Guale 1721 Britain builds Fort King George Chapter Outline Chapter 3 Why Study History? Foreword How to Do History Starting with Questions Sources of Information Using Primary Sources Analyzing and Evaluating Information Georgia Standards of Excellence The Dating Game Correlations Using a Timeline B.C.
    [Show full text]