Appendices

Appendix D Historic Resource Analysis Report

Crown City Medical Center Subsequent Draft EIR City of Pasadena

Appendices

This page intentionally left blank.

The Planning Center|DC&E October 2012

Historical Resource Analysis Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91101

Prepared For / Submitted To: Leah Boyer, Associate Planner The Planning Center | DC&E 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707

Prepared By: Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, AICP, RPH, Principal Noah Stewart, MCP, Associate Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC www.urbanapreservation.com

December 2011 | Revised February 22, 2012 | Revised September 28, 2012

D-1 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... 1

II. INTRODUCTION ...... 2 Project Description...... 2 Project Location ...... 2 Methodological Approach ...... 2

III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...... 6 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & Historical Resources ...... 6 Projects & Significant Effects...... 7 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation...... 7 City of Pasadena Historical Resource Evaluation / Landmark Designation Criteria ...... 8 Integrity ...... 8

IV. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW...... 9 Pasadena...... 9 Pasadena Playhouse Historic District...... 10 Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project Historical Resource Survey Area ...... 12

V. HISTORICAL RESOURCE SURVEY AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS & OBSERVATIONS ...... 14 Properties Outside of the Survey Boundaries...... 14

VI. ELIGIBILITY ANALYSIS & REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ...... 15 Eligibility Analysis – California & Local Register ...... 15 CEQA Historical Resource Interpretation & Impacts Findings ...... 16

VII. HISTORICAL RESOURCE CONCLUSIONS...... 17

VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY...... 18

FIGURES Figure 1 – Proposed Project Site Plan Figure 2 – Regional Location Map Figure 3 – Local Vicinity Map Figure 4 – Los Angeles Assessor Parcel Map Figure 5 – Boundary Map of the Pasadena Playhouse National Register Historic District Figure 6 – Vandevort Residences (Image) Figure 7 (a-d) – Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1894, 1903, 1931, 1951 Figure 8 – Mullen and Bluett Store (Image) Figure 9 – Harold A. Parker Photographic Service (Image)

APPENDICES Appendix A – Department of Parks & Recreation 523 A Form Appendix B – Preparer Qualifications

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page ii D-2 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Historical Resource Analysis Report (HRAR) was prepared by Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC (Urbana) to assist the City of Pasadena in the decision-making process and historic preservation requirements related to current and future proposed projects at the Crown City Medical Center property located at 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91011. A historical narrative (overview) of the proposed project site (survey area), description of existing conditions and field survey observations, contextual and site-specific historical property research and associated eligibility evaluation determinations, and related CEQA historical resource regulatory interpretations are included on the following pages.

Urbana’s historical resource survey boundaries include all parcels located within the footprint of the proposed project site. The parking lot and its appurtenant landscaping and small attendant building are not yet 50 years of age. There are no buildings or structures located within the survey area that are included on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the City of Pasadena Register of Historic Places, nor have any survey area buildings been previously surveyed or evaluated for eligibility on the Local, California Register, or National Register. No survey area properties are listed as California Historic Landmarks or Points of Historical Interest, and none of the survey area properties are included on the California State Office of Historic Preservation’s Historic Property Data File for Los Angeles County. None of the survey area properties observed and / or documented by Urbana were identified as being eligible for inclusion on the National Register, the California Register, or the Local Register.

The proposed project would involve the construction of an 112,252 square foot, five-story office and retail building. As proposed, the ground floor would contain 16,201 square feet of retail space and a lobby. The remaining four levels would consist of approximately 96,051 square feet of medical office space and common areas. The building would be 86 feet, 6 inches high. The building would be in an L-shape from the second floor upward spanning the northern and eastern parts of the site. The main lobby entrance would be at the northeastern corner of the building. On the east side of the building the second through fifth levels would be set back about 13 feet to provide space for the canopies of existing trees on Madison Avenue.

A six level subterranean parking garage is proposed (one level at grade and five subterranean) levels). ADA accessible parking spaces would be on the ground level; 396 total parking spaces would be provided. The floor of the fifth, that is, lowest, underground parking level would be roughly 56 feet below grade. Access to and from the parking structure would be from separate entrance and exit driveways that would both provide access to and from Converse Alley.

Because no properties within the survey area have been identified as listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources, or for designation as a City of Pasadena Landmark, it has been determined as part of this HRAR that no historic properties or historical resources are extant within the proposed project boundaries. The proposed project will not have a direct impact on historical resources.

There are numerous buildings immediately beyond the proposed project and survey area boundaries that have been evaluated as eligible for, or listed on, the Local Register, the California Register, or the National Register, including the National Register listed Pasadena Playhouse Historic District (PPHD), the boundaries for which were drawn to exclude a portion of the block containing the proposed project site at 550-558 Colorado Boulevard. The proposed project site is located outside the boundaries of the PPHD, but the site is surrounded to the east and the west by the historic district.

Because no tasks are proposed project within the PPHD boundaries, the proposed project will not result in a direct significant impact to the PPHD. The proposed project is located within a void in the PPHD – outside of the district boundaries – and will not indirectly impact the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of the PPHD, and as such, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of the PPHD.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 1 D-3 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

II. INTRODUCTION This Historical Resource Analysis Report (HRAR) was prepared to assist the City of Pasadena in the decision-making process and historic preservation requirements related to current and future proposed projects at the Crown City Medical Center property located at 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91011. A historical narrative (overview) of the survey area, description of existing conditions and field survey observations, contextual and site specific historical property research and associated eligibility evaluation determinations, and related CEQA historical resource regulatory interpretations are included on the following pages.

Project Description The project would involve the construction of an 112,252 square foot, five story office and retail building. As proposed, the ground floor would contain 16,201 square feet of retail space and a lobby. The remaining four levels would consist of approximately 96,051 square feet of medical office space and common areas. The building would be 86 feet, 6 inches high. The building would be in an L shape from the second floor upward spanning the northern and eastern parts of the site. The main lobby entrance would be at the northeastern corner of the building. On the east side of the building the second through fifth levels would be set back about 13 feet to provide space for the canopies of existing trees on Madison Avenue.

A six level subterranean parking garage is proposed (one level at grade and five subterranean) levels). ADA-accessible parking spaces would be on the ground level; 396 total parking spaces would be provided. The floor of the fifth, that is, lowest, underground parking level would be roughly 56 feet below grade. Access to and from the parking structure would be from separate entrance and exit driveways that would both provide access to and from Converse Alley.

Project Location The project is located on the southwest corner of Colorado Boulevard and Madison Avenue and is located in a fully developed urban area (see Figures 1-3). The subject property is composed of three separate parcels described by the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office as 5743-036-oo6, 5743-036-007, and 5743-036-008 (see Figure 4). Although the project is comprised of three parcels, they are currently used for the same purpose and appear to be a single 38,000 square feet surface parking lot. The lot provides 76 parking spaces for general public use. The site includes 5,400 square feet of landscaping consisting of shrubs and a few small trees. The site contains a 100 square foot office for the parking lot attendant at the northeast corner of the site. Access to the site is from Converse Alley, which runs east to west along the south site boundary.

Methodological Approach The methodological approach undertaken for this HRAR consisted of three major tasks - a site visit, archival research, and technical analysis. Urbana Principal Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, and Noah Stewart, Associate Preservation Planner / Architectural Historian, conducted the site visit on November 18, 2011. The purpose of the site visit was to observe and photograph the subject property and the surrounding community in order to understand and identify the architectural styles, character-defining features, building alterations and development patterns that comprise the property and those in its immediate vicinity. Representative views of the subject property were photographed as part of field survey efforts and are included in this report.

Archival research included a review of relevant records and reference resources on file at the Pasadena Central Library Centennial Room Pasadena History Collection and the Los Angeles Public Library. The Online Archive of California was used to identify historical maps and photographs as was the Pasadena Digital History Collaboration online photograph archive, and the Maynard Parker Collection housed at the Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens.

Noah Stewart conducted contextual and property-specific historical research. Information reviewed and obtained includes Pasadena City Directory listings, historic Sanborn Fire Insurance Map publications for Pasadena, City of Pasadena building permit applications, and County of Los Angeles land records. Additionally the City of Pasadena California Historical Resources Inventory Database (CHRID) was reviewed to identify and obtain documentation for surveyed or designated historical resources within the boundaries or in the immediate vicinity of the survey area. Urbana’s in-house library and the Los Angeles Times historical newspaper database provided additional context on the historical development patterns for Pasadena and the subject property.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 2 D-4 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Figure 1. Proposed Project Site Plan. Source: Green Oaks Investment 2008; The Planning Center | DC&E, Crown City Medical Center Initial Study.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 3 D-5 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Figure 2. Regional Location Map. Source: The Planning Center | DC&E, Crown City Medical Center Initial Study.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 4 D-6 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

‘

Figure 3. Local Vicinity Map. Source: The Planning Center | DC&E, Crown City Medical Center Initial Study.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 5 D-7 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Figure 4. Los Angeles Assessor Parcel Map, Book 5734, Page 36.

The technical analysis consisted of reviewing the property at 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard under the eligibility criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and the City of Pasadena Historical Resources Register (Local Register). These eligibility criteria establish a threshold under which a property may be determined to meet the definition of an historical resource for the purposes of CEQA and the local planning and development discretionary review process. For the purposes of consistent decision-making, the subject property’s history, architectural features, and integrity were analyzed within the context of the surrounding community, nearby designated properties, and within the identified context of the historical development patterns of Pasadena.

III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Following is an overview of historic preservation regulatory framework related to current and future tasks proposed within the Crown City Medical Center project area.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & Historical Resources The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted in 1970 in order to inform, identify, prevent, and disclose to decision-makers and the general public the effects a project may have on the environment. Historical resources are included in the comprehensive definition of the environment under CEQA. Under CEQA a historical resource is defined as:  Any resource listed in or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources by the State Historical Resources Commission; or  Any resource included in a local register of historical resources pursuant to §5020.1 (k) of the California Public Resources Code; or  Any resource identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the criteria set forth in §5024.1 (g) of the California Public Resource Code; or

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 6 D-8 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

 Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California.1

In order to be eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, one of the four following criteria must be met: 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; or 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method or construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in Public Resources Code sections 5020.1(j) or 5024.1

Projects & Significant Effects CEQA Public Resources Code §21084.1 provides that any project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. Substantial adverse change is defined as physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of the resource would be materially impaired.2

The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in the Local Register or the California Register of Historical Resources.3

Generally, a project that follows The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer, shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical resource. The intent of the Standards is to assist the long-term preservation of a property's significance through the preservation of historic materials and features. The Standards pertain to historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and interior of the buildings. They also encompass related landscape features and the building's site and environment, as well as attached, adjacent, or related new construction.

The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation "Rehabilitation" is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values." The treatment "rehabilitation" assumes that at least some repair or alteration of the historic building will be needed in order to provide for an efficient contemporary use; however, these repairs and alterations must not damage or destroy materials, features or finishes that are important in defining the building's historic character. The ten Standards for Rehabilitation are as follows. 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.

1 C.C.R. Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 5, §15064.5 (a)(1-3). 2 Ibid., §15064.5(b)(1) 3 Ibid., §15064.5(b)(2) Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 7 D-9 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.

3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.

5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved.

6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.

7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.

8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

City of Pasadena Historical Resource Evaluation / Landmark Designation Criteria Any property in Pasadena that is found eligible for designation as a Landmark shall be considered to meet the definition of an historical resource. Pursuant to City of Pasadena Zoning Code Section 17.62.040, a Landmark shall meet one or more of the following criteria at a local level of significance: a. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the City, region, or State. b. It is associated with the lives of persons who are significant in the history of the City, region, or State. c. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, architectural style, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of an architect, designer, engineer, or builder whose work is of significance to the City or, to the region or possesses artistic values of significance to the City or to the region. d. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important locally in prehistory or history.

Additionally any grouping of contiguous properties may be eligible for designation as a Landmark District by meeting the following criteria. a. Within its boundaries, a minimum of 60 percent of the properties qualify as contributing; and b. The grouping represents a significant and distinguishable entity of Citywide importance and one or more of a defined historic, cultural, development and/or architectural context(s).

Integrity According to National Register Bulletin 15 to retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of the seven aspects of integrity identified as:  Location (the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred),  Design (the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property),  Setting (the physical environment of a historic property),

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 8 D-10 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

 Materials (the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property),  Workmanship (the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory),  Feeling (a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time), and  Association (the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property).

IV. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Pasadena The Tongva, or Gabrielino, were the earliest people to inhabit the San Gabriel Valley. Native American population numbers were high owing to the abundant environment. The earliest European to enter the valley were led by Gaspar de Portola in 1769 as part of an expedition searching for a route from the missions of Baja California to Monterey Bay, in Central California. Two years later, in 1771, Spanish missionaries established the first European settlement in the Los Angeles area – the San Gabriel Mission Archangel on the banks of the Rio Hondo; it was the fourth mission established in Alta California. The newcomers built a chapel, dormitories and barracks buildings surrounded by stockade. Zanjas, or ditches, were built tapping the nearby river to irrigate fields. Corn and beans were the major crops, but grapes and other fruits were also grown. Cattle, horses, sheep, and other livestock were kept, grazing in the nearby Puente Hills. The fathers were successful at converting to Catholicism several dozen Native American families who took up residence near the compound. In 1881 colonists from mission San Gabriel founded what is now the City of Los Angeles.4 Mexico achieved independence from Spain in 1821. With independence the severe economic restrictions of the Spanish crown were removed and residents of Los Angeles began to trade more regularly with the outside world. As Los Angeles transitioned from a military garrison to a pueblo the city’s population grew from 650 to 1,250 between the years 1821 and 1845. Importance of the city during this period was made clear with its establishment as the capital of Alta California. American and other foreign traders slowly grew in numbers throughout the state. By becoming Mexican citizens and often marrying into local families well known characters like John Sutter and Joseph Bidwell were able to gain title to rancho lands. This was particularly true after the 1834 secularization law distributing previously church held mission lands to the former neophyte populations.5

The 1840s saw a significant increase in land grants given by the Mexican government. With the continuing influx of immigrants, particularly Americans, the threat of invasion by the United States was very real. Land grants were seen as a way to develop the state and discourage an assault by the US. Foreigners could acquire property but first had to become Mexican citizens. Many Americans were able to secure significant holdings throughout the state. Given the area’s fertility, land in the San Gabriel Valley was especially sought after by grant seekers. Following secularization of the missions the Mexican government split up the San Gabriel Mission lands, creating three ranchos in the Pasadena area: Rancho San Rafael, Rancho San Pasqual, and Rancho Santa Anita. The Subject property is located in what was Rancho San Pasqual.6 The Mexican government granted the 14,000 acre Rancho San Pasqual to the Juan Marine, who died before he could obtain full title to the land. Marine’s heirs sold any rights they had to the property after his death to Jose Perez, who along with Enreque Sepulveda secured a grant of the property in 1840. Perez died in 1841 and with this Sepulveda abandoned the property. Two years later Governor Manuel Micheltorena awarded the property to Manuel Garfias, who built a house and used the property to graze horses and cattle. Unable to pay a debt to John Griffin, Garfias lost the property to his debtors in 1858. After gaining title, Griffin, an American doctor who had settled in Los Angeles, transferred the partial interest in the ranch to his associate Benjamin Wilson, later the second mayor of Los Angeles and state senator. The two sold off portions of the ranch for speculative development but also setup irrigation and planted

4 David Lindsey and Martin Schiesl, Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin Historic Resources Survey, prepared for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles, 1976, and Francesca Smith, Jim Steely, Caprice D. Harper and Shannon Carmack, Historic Resources Evaluation Report for the San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation, Cities of San Gabriel, Alhambra, and Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California, prepared for the California Department of Transportation and Alameda Corridor – East Construction Authority, 2010, 27-28. 5 Smith, et al, 28. 6 Ann Scheid, Pasadena: Crown of the Valley (Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, 1986), 19. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 9 D-11 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

extensive orchards and vineyards across their land.7 Griffin and Wilson maintained a significant portion of the rancho for themselves. However, 1873 they sold nearly 4,000 acres on the east side of the Arroyo Seco to the San Gabriel Orange Grove Association, a collection of investors from the state of Indiana. The investors subdivided the land between themselves, planning lots, streets and parks. Many quickly ran irrigation from the Arroyo Seco, built houses laid out orange orchards. Others further subdivided their property, spurring further development. By 1875 the group developed a small village of 40 houses surrounded by thousands of orange trees.8 Development continued slowly throughout the 1870s and early 1880s. By 1880 the community had grown to nearly 400 people with a hotel, a school and several stores.9 The community’s first railroad, linking Pasadena and Los Angeles, opened in 1885. Wanting local control of such things as street paving, street lighting, and police and fire protection, in 1886 the City of Pasadena officially incorporated. At the same time the fledgling city, like much of Southern California, experienced a major population boom, which at the height inflated the city’s population to as many as 15,000. It was during this time that Pasadena became a major tourist attraction. The first of the resort hotels that would later make the city famous, the Raymond, opened in 1886, just south of the city. By 1890 the city’s population dropped down to 5,000, and although it had decreased it was more than ten times higher than the previous decade and could boast many new houses and several brick commercial buildings along Colorado Boulevard, the City’s principal thoroughfare.10 The tourist economy developed during the boom served the City well in the following decades. By the early 1900s entrepreneurs developed a number of fashionable resort hotels in Pasadena, including the Hotel Green, the Maryland Hotel, and the Hotel Wentworth (later Hotel Huntington).11 As the twentieth century progressed the city continued to expand in population and size. Tourists flocked to the city for its mild climate and natural beauty. In addition to the areas landscape, tourists came to enjoy the parks created by the City as well as the many tourist attractions boosters developed, including the Tournament of Roses, Cawston’s Ostrich Farm in South Pasadena, and the Mount Lowe Railway, which transported adventures to the summit of Mount Wilson. Significantly, many of those who first came to the area as tourists decided to stay. Others, particularly wealthy easterners like Adolphus Bush, William Wrigley, and Mrs. George Pullman, erected stately winter resort homes. Overtime distinct neighborhoods developed and Colorado Boulevard expanded eastward; in the 1920s city officials established the civic center north of Colorado Boulevard at Garfield Avenue, encouraging further easterly growth.

Pasadena Playhouse Historic District The subject property is situated in an area generally known as the Pasadena Playhouse District, a part of Downtown Pasadena that features a mix of attractions including restaurants, museums and theaters. The Pasadena Playhouse Historic District is a subpart of the Playhouse District. The Pasadena Playhouse Historic District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) on May 19, 1994 under National Register criteria A and C, for its association with and representation of community planning and development patterns, performing arts, and architecture in Pasadena. At the time of its listing the district was comprised of 34 contributing elements – 32 buildings and two objects (signs). Eight buildings within the district were considered non-contributing elements. The period of significance was established as 1906 – 1940. The boundaries of the district were drawn in a “U” shape and include properties along Colorado Boulevard as well as South El Molino Avenue, Madison Avenue and Green Street (see Figure 5). The subject property, as well as its western neighbor (what is now occupied by the County of Los Angeles), and the Pasadena Presbyterian Church across Colorado Boulevard are located within a void in the district boundary – they are not within the boundaries of the Pasadena Playhouse Historic District – and do not contribute to the historic district.12 Today the PPHD is comprised of 33 contributing elements – 32 buildings and one sign. One historic sign originally found to contribute to the district (Zinke’s) has been removed.

7 Scheid, 19-21 and Jane Apostol, South Pasadena: A Centennial History (South Pasadena, CA: South Pasadena Public Library, 1987), 7-9. 8 Scheid, 29-31. 9 Scheid, 54 and Thomas D. Carpenter, Pasadena: Resort Hotels and Paradise (Azusa, CA: Marc Sheldon Publishing, 1984), 9. 10 Until 1927 what is now Colorado Boulevard was known as Colorado Street. For more information see Leonard Kliwinski and James D. Wilson, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Pasadena Playhouse Historic District (Newport Beach, CA: Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., 1993), section 8, page 7. For the ease of comprehension the road will be referred to as Colorado Boulevard throughout the document. 11 Scheid, 58 and Carpenter 16-18. 12 Kliwinski and Wilson, 2-3. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 10 D-12 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

F i Figure 5. Boundary Map of the Pasadena Playhouse National Register Historic District. The proposed Crown City Medical Center Project parcel, demarcated by the star symbol, is located outside of the Historic District boundaries, but the parcel is surrounded to the east and west by the Historic District. Source: City of Pasadena CHRID – Pasadena Playhouse Historic District National Register Nomination.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 11 D-13 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

The historic district is composed of buildings designed in a variety of revival styles, including Spanish Colonial, Mediterranean, Gothic, and Classical, but there are also buildings in the Art Deco style. Most of the buildings have a similar design vocabulary; they are low in scale, most buildings are one and two stories, although buildings as tall as eight stories are also contributing elements of the historic district. Buildings are set at the sidewalk and are composed of repeating bays. Facades are typically broken into distinct vertical groupings – ground, middle and top. Upper windows are set in recessed openings; ground floor windows are usually large and opened to the street. Entrances are articulated and well marked.13

The historic district is representative of the “second wave” of Pasadena’s growth. Prior to construction of the civic center, the City’s commercial and cultural center centered around Colorado Boulevard and Fair Oaks Avenue. With the completion of the civic center commercial development moved eastward along Colorado Boulevard into what was previously a fashionable residential area (see Figure 6). The 1922 zoning ordinance sealed the neighborhood’s fate. Under the new regulations the area that is now the Pasadena Playhouse Historic District was up-zoned for “commercial” and “third residential” and as a result retail, office and apartment construction increased. In the ensuing decades commercial development replaced nearly all other uses along Colorado Boulevard.14 Over the last few decades redevelopment and infill construction have intensified commercial uses in the area.

Figure 6. Vandevort Residences at 482 (left) and 494 (center) East Colorado Street, one-half block west of subject property, ca. 1895. Source: California History Room, Picture Collection.

Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project Historical Resource Survey Area The history of the proposed project site and historical resource survey area follows a path similar to the surrounding neighborhood. The land was part of Rancho San Pasqual and was first subdivided in 1876 as part of the Benjamin Wilson’s San Pasqual Tract of the Lake Vineyard Land and Water Association lands. The subdivision established the gridded street pattern seen today with Colorado Boulevard and California Street as the east—west, east of Fair Oaks Avenue, and Marengo, Los Robles, Moline (now El Molino) and Lake Avenues serving north—south traffic. Later

13 Kliwinski and Wilson, section 7, page 2. 14 Kliwinski and Wilson, section 8, page 2. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 12 D-14 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

subdivisions added several other streets throughout district. Lots in Wilson’s subdivision were mostly ten acre plots, although a few in the northwest section were as large as 20 acres. The lots on the south side of Colorado Boulevard were the smallest, each a little more than four and a half acres.15

In 1896 the subject property along with the surrounding parcels were further subdivided as part of the Alvin Gibbs Subdivision. Both Oakland and Madison Avenues were added at this time and Colorado Boulevard was expanded from 50 to 100 feet wide.16 By the mid-1890s a residential neighborhood had begun to develop. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps dated 1894 depict several large houses fronting Colorado Boulevard. While not illustrated on the later Gibbs map, the Sanborn map shows the subject properties divided into three parcels, as it is today, with single residential structures on each.17 It is unclear why the two maps are in disagreement. However, city directories show Alvin Gibbs living at 522 East Colorado, which was adjacent to the subject property. Of the three residential buildings depicted on the 1894 Sanborn map occupants of two were identified in city directories: Frank Wallace occupied 564 East Colorado Boulevard and James F. Parker and his son Harold lived at 572 East Colorado Boulevard, at the corner of Madison Avenue (see Figure 7a).18

The Sanborn map dating to 1903 documents the continued residential intensification of the neighborhood (See Figure 7b). While development first occurred along Colorado Boulevard by the turn of the century houses lined the intersecting streets to the south. Additionally, what was previously identified as an orchard south of Colorado Boulevard was either developed or vacant land. Although Oakland Avenue was not depicted on the previous maps, it is by 1903. By this time, the First Church of Christian Science replaced Gibbs residence at the corner of Colorado Boulevard and Oakland Avenue.

The first commercial building erected on the south side of the 500 block of Colorado Boulevard was in 1925 with the eight-story Pasadena Furniture Company building located at 530 Colorado Boulevard (immediately west of the subject property). Although extensively altered in the late 1950s, the building is still in use. The first commercial building constructed on the subject property (AIN 5734-036-006) was the elegant 1925 Spanish Renaissance edifice designed by the well-known Los Angeles architectural firm Morgan, Walls and Clements for Mullen and Bluett (see Figure 8). A new rather generic Spanish Colonial building replaced the house on the corner of Colorado Boulevard and Madison Avenue (AIN 5734-036-008) by 1929. The building housed Harold A. Parker’s photographic studio as well as rental store fronts

Figure 7a. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, 1894, page 21. Figure 7b. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, 1903, page 47.

15 “San Pasqual Tract of the Lake Vineyard Land and Water Association lands,” on file at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Land Records Information, Miscellaneous Records 3 – 315, 1876. 16 “Alvin Gibbs Subdivision,” on file at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Land Records Information, Miscellaneous Records 59 – 93, 1896. 17 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map for Pasadena, California, 1894, sheet 21. 18 The Moore Pasadena City Directory (Pasadena: The Moore Pasadena Directory Co. Publishers, 1900), 306. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 13 D-15 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Figure 7c. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, 1931, page 124. Figure 7d. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, 1951, page 124.

(see Figure 9). The building in between these was built at some time before 1931 as it appears on the Sanborn map dated that year (see Figure 7c). By 1931, the commercial redevelopment of the area was complete. Sanborn Maps depict a diverse mix of uses including retail as well as entertainment venues such as movie theaters. City Directories dating to the 1930s through the 1960s note several different businesses occupying the buildings once located on the subject property, including multiple women’s clothing and shoes stores, an appliance store, a radio store, an optometrist and a beauty shop, among others.19 The 1951 Sanborn map illustrates further intensification of commercial uses in the area as well as the expansion of the buildings located on the subject property.

Starting in the late 1960s city directories list as vacant several of the store fronts located within the subject property. The trend continued into the 1970s. By 1975 all but one store were vacant. In 1976 the City of Pasadena issued the building owners a demolition permit for the three buildings located on the subject property. The buildings were likely razed shortly after. According to permits the extant parking lot with its appurtenant landscaping and the attendant building were constructed in 1981.

V. HISTORICAL RESOURCE SURVEY AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS & OBSERVATIONS The historical resource survey boundaries include all parcels located within the footprint of the proposed project site. The proposed project entails constructing an 112,252 square foot, five story office and retail building with a six level subterranean parking garage on what is currently a 38,000 square feet surface parking lot. The site includes 5,400 square feet of landscaping consisting of shrubs and a few small trees. A low split face concrete block wall encloses the north and east sides of the parcel. A small, 100 square foot building is located at the northeast corner of the site. The building, which permit records indicate was constructed in 1980, is the only permanent structure on the subject property. It is trapezoidal in plan and like the peripheral wall surrounding the parking lot it is clad in brown split face concrete block. A short stucco covered parapet obscures the roof structure. The roof overhangs the south side and is supported by three split face concrete piers. Plywood covers what appear to be two pedestrian entryways. The building has no windows. All buildings or structures observed within the subject property are less than 45 years of age.

Properties Outside of the Survey Boundaries The Pasadena Playhouse Historic District (PPHD) is located in the vicinity of the proposed project site; however the proposed project site is not located within the historic district. The boundaries of the district were drawn in a “U” shape and include properties along Colorado Boulevard as well as South El Molino Avenue, Madison Avenue and Green Street. The proposed Crown City Medical Center project site, as well as its western neighbor (what is now occupied by the

19 Thurston's Pasadena City Directory (Los Angeles: Los Angeles Directory Co.) for the years 1930, 1935, 1940, 1943, 1949, 1956, 1960, and 1965. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 14 D-16 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

County of Los Angeles), and the Pasadena Presbyterian Church across Colorado Boulevard are located within a void in the district boundary – they are not within the boundaries of the PPHD – and do not contribute to the historic district. The nearest contributing element to the historic district is the 1929 First Trust Bank Building, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Colorado Boulevard and Madison Avenue.

Figure 8. Mullen and Bluett Store, Pasadena, California, ca. 1925. Source: The Architectural Forum.20

VI. ELIGIBILITY ANALYSIS & REGULATORY INTERPRETATION Eligibility Analysis – California & Local Register The survey area was historically developed with low-density residential uses in the late 19th Century. At least three single-family residential buildings were built on three separate parcels that comprise the present-day proposed project site and survey boundaries. The land was redeveloped in the mid-1920s; three commercial buildings replaced the residences. Like most buildings in the surrounding area, the commercial buildings were low in scale and sited adjacent to the Colorado Boulevard. Over the years the buildings were occupied by a variety of retail ventures, including Harold A. Parker’s photography studio, several millinery/clothing shops, a radio store, an appliance store, a bookstore, and a silversmith. The three buildings were demolished in 1976 and by 1980 the existing parking lot and small attendant building were constructed. The existing parking lot and associated building are approximately 31 years of age.

No historic-era properties are located within the proposed project site and historical resource survey boundaries. The historical resource survey boundaries include all parcels located within the footprint of the proposed project site. The survey area includes a parking lot and building dating to 1980 that are approximately 31 years of age and do not meet age eligibility criteria for consideration to listing on the Local Register, California Register, or the National Register. Additionally, historical research did not identify significant events associated with the existing parking lot and building,

20 Donald E. Marquis, “The Spanish Stores of Morgan, Walls and Clements,” The Architectural Forum, Vol. 50 (June 1929), 902. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 15 D-17 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR nor is there a direct association with the existing parking lot and building with important persons in local, state, or national history. The parking lot and associated attendant building are ordinary resource types and do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a specific style, type, period, or method of construction that would be considered important or exceptionally significant. No information was identified to support the notion that the parking lot and associated building have the potential to yield future information important to local, state, regional, or national history. As a result the existing 31-year old parking lot and associated building are not eligible for recognition as City of Pasadena Landmarks or for listing to the California Register of Historical Resource.

Figure 9. Harold A. Parker Photographic Service, ca. 1929. Source: The Huntington Library, Art Collection and Botanical Garden. The business and building was located in the boundaries of the proposed project site and survey boundaries. The property was demolished in 1976 and replaced by the existing parking lot by 1980.

CEQA Historical Resource Interpretation & Impacts Findings No historical resources are present within the survey area. The survey area is defined as the proposed Crown City Medical Center project site. Because no historical resources are located within the project site, the proposed Crown City Medical Center project will not cause a direct impact to a historical resource.

The historic-era Pasadena Presbyterian Church is located 558 E. Colorado Boulevard, immediately north of the proposed Crown City Medical Center project site. The church property is outside the boundaries of the surrounding National Register listed PPHD and is not listed in the City of Pasadena CHRID. The church property does not appear to have been previously identified as a historical resource. The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the historic-era Pasadena Presbyterian Church property because the project will not demolish, destruct, relocate, or alter the immediate settings of the church such that its potential significance would be materially impaired.

The proposed project site is located adjacent to, but outside of the boundaries of the National Register listed PPHD. The construction of the proposed project would appear to have the potential to cause an impact on the PPHD. However, the intersection of Colorado Boulevard and Madison Avenue, where the proposed project site is located, is not a particularly sensitive intersection with respect to historical resources because two of the corners (at the southwest and the southeast) are developed with surface parking lots (one inside and one outside the boundaries of the PPHD), and Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 16 D-18 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR because the scale of the development at the northeast corner (the First Trust Bank Building) is taller and more intensive than the proposed project.

The nearest contributing element of the PPHD is the First Trust Bank Building, located at 559 E. Colorado Boulevard. The First Trust Bank Building is also individually listed on the National Register. This property is of the most concern with regard to impacts because it is within view of the proposed Crown City Medical Center project site. However, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the First Trust bank Building as a historical resource because the proposed project will not demolish, destruct, relocate, or alter the immediate setting of the resource such that the significance of the resource would be materially or visually impaired.

The proposed project entails constructing an 112,252 square foot, five story office and retail building with a six level subterranean parking garage. In terms of building heights, the proposed building will be smaller than its existing neighbor, the eight-story building former Pasadena Furniture Building. The parking structure to the south, across from Converse Alley is six-stories. The proposed building will be five-stories and below the permitted 90 foot height limit.

With regard to potential indirect impacts to the PPHD the project will not alter the district’s integrity to the degree that it would no longer be eligible for inclusion on the National Register or the California Register. The project will not alter the integrity of location of the PPHD, the PPHD and its contributing elements will remain in the place where the historic property/historical resource was constructed. The integrity of design will not be altered. The proposed Crown City Medical Center project is located outside of the boundaries of the PPHD and will not directly or indirectly impact the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of the PPHD. The project will not alter the setting to the degree that the PPHD will no longer be eligible for the National Register/ California Register. The setting was previously altered to a significant degree through infill development over the years. The current project is in scale with surrounding buildings, including those contributing elements of the PPHD. The proposed project will not alter the material integrity of the PPHD as it will not alter the physical elements that were combined or deposited during the PPHD’s period of significance. The project will not impact the PPHD’s integrity of workmanship, the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory as the project is not directly alter any of the contributing elements of the historic district. The project will not alter the PPHD’s integrity of feeling as it will not change the PPHD’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. Finally, the project will not alter the PPHD’s integrity of association, the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property, as it will not directly alter any of the contributing elements within the district boundaries. The proposed project will not cause an indirect impact on the PPHD.

VII. HISTORICAL RESOURCE CONCLUSIONS The proposed project entails constructing an 112,252 square foot, five story office and retail building with a six level subterranean parking garage on what is currently a 38,000 square feet surface parking lot. The site includes 5,400 square feet of landscaping consisting of shrubs and a few small trees. A low split face concrete block wall encloses the north and east sides of the parcel. A small, 100 square foot building is located at the northeast corner of the site. The building, which permit records indicate was constructed in 1980, is the only permanent structure on the subject property. It is trapezoidal in plan and like the peripheral wall surrounding the parking lot it is clad in brown split face concrete block. All buildings or structures observed within the subject property are less than 45 years of age.

Urbana’s historical resource survey boundaries include all parcels located within the footprint of the proposed project. The parking lot and its appurtenant landscaping and small attendant building are not yet 50 years of age. There are no buildings or structures located within the project area that are included on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the City of Pasadena Register of Historic Places, nor have any project area buildings been previously surveyed or evaluated for eligibility on the local, state or national registers. No project area properties are listed as California Historic Landmarks or Points of Historical Interest, and none of the survey-area properties are included on the California State Office of Historic Preservation’s Historic Property Data File for Los Angeles County. None of the properties appear to have been previously presented to or discussed by the State Historic Resources Commission. None of the buildings observed and / or documented by Urbana were identified as being eligible for inclusion on the National Register, the California Register, or the Local Register.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 17 D-19 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Because no properties within the survey area have been identified as listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources, or for designation as a City of Pasadena Landmark, it has been determined as part of this HRAR that no historic properties or historical resources are extant within the proposed project boundaries. The proposed project will not have a direct impact on historical resources.

The proposed project site is located in the vicinity of the Pasadena Playhouse Historic District, however it is not within the boundaries of the historic district. The proposed project will not result in a direct or significant level of impact to the nearby historic district, nor would the proposed project result in indirect impacts to the historic district or any of the individual contributors located within.

VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY Apostol, Jane. South Pasadena: A Centennial History. South Pasadena, CA: South Pasadena Public Library, 1987.

Carpenter, Thomas D. Pasadena: Resort Hotels and Paradise. Azusa, CA: Marc Sheldon Publishing, 1984.

City of Pasadena, California Historical resources Information Database (CHRID) – District Summary – Pasadena Playhouse Historic District. http://pasadena.cfwebtools.com/search.cfm?dist_id=55&display=district&res_id=1641 Accessed December 8, 2011.

Kliwinski, Leonard and James D. Wilson. National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Pasadena Playhouse Historic District. Newport Beach, CA: Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., 1993.

Lindsey, David and Martin Schiesl. Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin Historic Resources Survey. Prepared for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles, 1976.

Marquis, Donald E. “The Spanish Stores of Morgan, Walls and Clements,” The Architectural Forum, Vol. 50 (June 1929), 901-916.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, Pasadena, CA, 1894, 1903, 1931, 1951.

Scheid, Ann. Pasadena: Crown of the Valley. Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, 1986.

Smith, Francesca, Jim Steely, Caprice D. Harper and Shannon Carmack. Historic Resources Evaluation Report for the San Gabriel Trench Grade Separation, Cities of San Gabriel, Alhambra, and Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. Prepared for the California Department of Transportation and Alameda Corridor – East Construction Authority, 2010.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Page 18 D-20 Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Appendix A – Department of Parks & Recreation 523 A Form

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Appendix A D-21 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #: PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial: NRHP Status Code: 6Z Other Listings: Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 1 *Resource Name or #: 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard

P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County: Los Angeles *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Pasadena Date: T ; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard City: Pasadena Zip: 91101 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Los Angeles County Assessor Information Number: 5743-036-006, 5743-036-007, and 5743-036-008

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The property at 550-558 East Colorador Boulevard is a 38,000 square feet surface parking lot. The site includes 5,400 square feet of landscaping consisting of shrubs and a few small trees. A low split face concrete block wall encloses the north and east sides of the parcel. A small, 100 square foot building is located at the northeast corner of the site. The building, which permit records indicate was constructed in 1980, is the only permanent structure on the subject property. It is trapezoidal in plan and like the peripheral wall surrounding the parking lot it is clad in brown split face concrete block. A short stucco covered parapet obscures the roof structure. The roof overhangs the south side and is supported by three split face concrete piers. Plywood covers what appear to be two pedestrian entryways. The building has no windows. The 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard property, including the surface parking lot and small building, is approximately 31 years of age. The property does not meet the age threshold to be considered for eligibility (45-50 years), nor does it exhibit exception significance that would negate the age eligibility threshold.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP4. Ancillary building, HP39. Other (parking lot) *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and P5b. Description of Photo: (View, objects.) date, accession #) Looking southwest from the intersection of Colorado Blvd and Madison Ave. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Non-Historic Built in 1980 (permit) *P7. Owner and Address:

*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) Noah M. Stewart Urbana Preservation & Planning. LLC www.urbanapreservation.com *P9. Date Recorded: December 2011 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Reconnaissance – Level CEQA Determination

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Wendy L. Tinsley Becker and Noah Stewart, Historical Resource Analysis Report: Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR, 550-558 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91101, 2011. *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) D-22 *Required information Historical Resource Analysis (Technical) Report Proposed Crown City Medical Center Project EIR

Appendix B – Preparer Qualifications

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC December 2011 | Revised February 2012 | Revised September 2012 ◼ Appendix B D-23 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL

Ms. Tinsley Becker brings an expert background in American history, architectural history and urban planning, with a particular emphasis on issues relating to historic preservation. Her experience includes extensive historical resources survey work, design review under The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, single-site historic property research and documentation, and practice in municipal regulatory planning and cultural resources compliance issues including code compliance, revision and review, CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. As a preservation-planning consultant she participates in the development and administration of local land use regulations, policies, programs and projects; prepares reports involving research and analysis of various planning issues; conducts site- specific project and design review; and facilitates project coordination between contractors, architects, developers, citizens and other stakeholders. Wendy meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards in the disciplines of History and Architectural History and the draft standards established for Historic Preservation and Land Use/Community Planning. She is included on the California Council for the Promotion of History’s Register of Professional Historians and also maintains professional certification in the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP).

Wendy was the founding President of the Jack London District Association, a non-profit community advocacy organization for the Jack London District, an emerging neighborhood located along the historic industrial waterfront of Oakland, California that is anchored by a ten-block district of intact historically and architecturally significant warehouse properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places. In this position Wendy facilitated community-visioning workshops, presided over community meetings, corresponded and negotiated with City Staff and Council representatives, and development interests on behalf of the Jack London District. Wendy served as a Board member of the Northern California Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA) from 2004 through 2006 where she was appointed as the San Francisco and East Bay Chair for the group’s Regional Advisory Council. She is currently the Chair of the APA National Urban Design & Preservation Division. From 2006 forward Wendy has held the position of Instructor within the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Extension Urban Planning & Development professional program, where she teaches courses on Historic Preservation Planning, American Architectural History, Urban Planning, and Planning History, and also serves as a program Advisory Group Member to further historic preservation in local planning and development education curriculums. Historic preservation and cultural resources professionals working in San Diego and the Southern California region regularly attend her historic preservation and American architectural history courses. Wendy is a former Director/Board Member of the San Diego Architectural Foundation. She is the Founder of the Built Environment Education Program (BEEP) San Diego, a volunteer organization that strives to engage and educate school-age youth in all aspects of the built environment, including the concepts, methods, disciplines, and professional practice of urban planning, architecture, and landscape architecture. Wendy has authored invited contributions for the Encyclopedia of the City publication and authored the United States Research Bibliography for the book The International Faces of Urban Sprawl.

She regularly consults for private and agency applicants on historical resource and historic property analysis for discretionary projects and undertakings pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality Act, as well as Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit proposals at National Register listed or eligible properties, which are subject to review by the State Office of Historic Preservation and the National Park Service. Wendy has assisted jurisdictions in preservation planning program development and implementation efforts through:  Crafting historic preservation ordinance language and related procedural and administrative guidelines;  Reviewing existing programs for specialized use in historic preservation strategies;  Establishing preservation incentive and benefit programs;  Navigating proposed programs through the participatory process including educating advisory committees and established municipal historic preservation boards;  Facilitating public workshops, and presenting conclusions and recommendations to city decision-makers;  Developing historic contexts relating to architectural and social history; and  Conducting comprehensive historical resource/historic property surveys to identify and evaluate eligible properties and inform the current and long-range planning and development process.

Wendy served as the lead historic preservation consultant for the City of Chula Vista’s recently adopted Municipal Preservation Planning Program, and recently authored a Historic Preservation Element for the City of La Mesa’s 2030 General Plan update process. She provides survey, architectural history, context development, programmatic agreement, and historic preservation planning consulting services for the Southern California Edison Company. She is the lead Architectural Historian for the City and County of Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project’s Kako’o (Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Program manager) team. Wendy’s professional analysis and determinations are regularly reviewed for compliance and concurrence by numerous municipalities, and state and federal agencies including the California State Office of Historic Preservation, the California Public Utilities Commission, the USDA Forest Service, and the National Park Service. D-24 1 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

EDUCATION Master of City Planning, Historic Preservation & Urban Design Concentration Thesis Title: How Cities Grow: A History Of San Diego Neighborhood Development Patterns, 1769-1955 California State University, San Diego

Bachelor of Arts – History, Public History & Urban Studies Concentration Senior Research Thesis: Another Streetcar Suburb: The Development of Mission Beach, 1914-1930 California State University, San Diego

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Founding Principal: Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC, (San Diego & Oakland) 04/2005-present Faculty + Lecturer: San Diego State University Master of City Planning Graduate program, 2012-forward Instructor: University of California, San Diego – Extension, 2006-forward -Urban Planning & Development Professional Program / Art & the Creative Process Certificate Program -Courses Taught: Architectural History, Historic Preservation Planning, Historic Preservation Planning Online, Fundamentals of City Planning, Foundations of Planning & the Built Environment Architectural Historian & Preservation Planner: Architectural Resources Group (San Francisco & Los Angeles), 10/2002-04/2005 Architectural Historian & Preservation Planner: HRS, (San Diego) 12/2001-10/2002 Graduate Instructor: Urban Studies & Planning Program, University of CA at San Diego, Courses Taught: USP 124-Land Use Planning, Dr. Nico Calavita, 09/2001 – 12/2001 Graduate Teaching Assistant: City Planning Graduate Program, San Diego State University, Dr. Nico Calavita, 01/2000 – 08/2000, 09/2001 – 12/2001, 01/2002 – 05/2002 Historian & Historic Preservation Planner: Office of Marie Burke Lia, Attorney at Law, (San Diego) 01/2000-11/2001 Assistant Coordinator: SHPO/CHRIS-South Coastal Information Center, 07/1998-08/1999 Consultant, East Side Survey and Oral History Program: City of Oceanside Department of Planning and Land Use, 01/1999-06/1999 Consultant, National Register of Historic Places Travel Itinerary: City of San Diego Historic Site Board, 06/1998-06/1999 Research Assistant: SHPO/CHRIS-South Coastal Information Center, 12/1996-07/1998

SELECT RELATED EXPERIENCE / CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL SEMINARS & EDUCATION Forthcoming Speaker: Preservation Toolkit for Small Cities, American Planning Association California Chapter Conference, 10/2012. Invited Panel Speaker: Outsiders & Fringe Dwellers – Preservation Partners of the Future, California Preservation Foundation Conference, 05/2011 Guest Lecturer: Preservation, Housing, and Sustainability, UCSD Urban Studies & Planning Program, 05/2011 Invited Speaker: Harriett Wimmer, Women, and Modern Landscape Architecture in California, Congress of History of San Diego & Imperial Counties, 03/2011 Guest Lecturer: Historic Preservation Planning, San Diego State University Public Administration Program, 07/2010 Attendee: AIA Webinar, The 2030 Commitment: Setting and Achieving Energy Goals with Integrated Design, 12/2009 Attendee: APA Webinar, Balancing the Land-Use Transportation Equation: At the Community Level, 09/2009 Attendee: APA Webinar, LEED for Neighborhoods, 08/2009 Attendee: San Diego APA, Making Density Work – San Diego Density Symposium, 10/2008 Moderator: Planning for Preservation: A Survey of Municipal Preservation Programs Throughout San Diego County, San Diego APA & UCSD Extension–UPD Cert. Program, 08/2008 Invited Speaker: Local Historic Site Designation & The Mills Act Historic Property Tax Credit Program, City of San Leandro (CA), 04/2005 Attendee: CA Preservation Foundation & CA Office of Historic Preservation, Historical Resource Surveys for Local Governments, San Diego (CA) 02/2004 Attendee: National Charrette Institute, Introduction to Dynamic Planning (Level 1 NCI Charrette Manager Certification Training), San Diego (CA) 10/2003 Attendee: CA Preservation Foundation, Incentives for Historic Preservation Projects, Berkeley (CA) 09/2003 Attendee: University of Southern CA, Preservation Planning & Law, Los Angeles (CA) 07/2003

2 D-25 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

Attendee: League of CA Cities, Smart Growth Zoning Codes, Lodi (CA) 12/2002 Invited Participant: Second Natures, Redefining The Los Angeles Riverfront, Los Angeles (CA) 01/2002 (2-Day Planning & Design Charrette hosted by MOCA & The Geffen) Selected Smart Growth Researcher: San Diego State University Foundation & City Planning Graduate Program, Dr. Roger Caves, 01/2001 – 08/2001 (Grant Topic: Planning for Sprawl in the U.S) Attendee: Section 106 An Introductory Course, National Preservation Institute, San Francisco (CA) 04/1999

SELECT MEMBERSHIPS & REGISTRATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP – Certified Planner #022838) Register of Professional Historians, CA Council for the Promotion of History (RPH –Professional Historian #612) American Institute of Architects (Allied AIA) American Planning Association (APA) Association for Preservation Technology International (APT) California Preservation Foundation (CPF) National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) Society for American City and Regional Planning History (SACRPH)

BOARDS & COMMITTEES Chair – American Planning Association National Urban Design & Preservation Division, 04/2012-forward Founder + Executive Director – Built Environment Education Program (BEEP) San Diego, 2008-forward Education Committee Member – California Preservation Foundation, 04/2012-forward Vice-Chair + Newsletter Editor – APA National Urban Design & Preservation Division, 01/2010-03/2012 Nominating Committee Member – APA National Urban Design & Preservation Division, 10/2009-02/2010 Director & Education Chair – San Diego Architectural Foundation, 11/2008 forward Appointed Public Member – City of San Diego Historical Resources Board Incentives Subcommittee, 08/2008-02/2010 Consultant Advisor – City of Chula Vista Interim Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, 2007-2008 California Representative – Urban Design & Preservation Division, American Planning Association, 2007-2008 Advisor/Member – UCSD Extension Advisory Group Urban Planning & Development Certificate Program, 2007 forward Founding President – Jack London District Association, 2005-2006 East Bay Co-Chair – Regional Advisory Council, APA Northern Section-CA Chapter, 2005-2006 San Francisco Chair – Regional Advisory Council, APA Northern Section-CA Chapter, 2004-2005

AWARDS 2012 APA National Division Executive Committee Recipient – American Planning Association Education Excellence Award (recognized for education efforts on behalf of the APA Urban Design & Preservation Division). 2011 APA National Division Executive Committee Recipient – American Planning Association Branding Award (recognized for visibility, outreach, and education efforts on behalf of the APA Urban Design & Preservation Division). 2010 Recipient – Award of Excellence in Education - City of San Diego City Planning & Community Investment Department Historical Resources Board (recognized for the Built Environment Education Program developed for the San Diego Architectural Foundation / BEEP San Diego). 2009 Recipient – San Diego Public Library Foundation / Friends of the San Diego Public Library 2008- 2009 Chapter Volunteer Award, University Heights Branch (recognized for preservation planning work at the historic San Diego State Normal College campus).

SELECT PUBLICATIONS In-progress (1) The General Plan and Historic Preservation; An Overview of Historic Preservation Elements in the State of CA. (2) San Diego County’s Municipal Preservation Report Card. 2006 “United States Research Bibliography” The International Faces of Urban Sprawl: Lessons Learned From North America. Fritz Wagner (ed.) Geography Dept. University of Waterloo: Waterloo, Ontario. 2005 “Courtyards” Encyclopedia Of The City. Roger Caves (ed.) Routledge: London. 2005 “Robert Venturi” Encyclopedia Of The City. Roger Caves (ed.) Routledge: London. 3 D-26 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

SELECT PROJECTS / REPORTS / DOCUMENTATION In-process Historic Agricultural Landscapes of Visalia and Tulare County electronic book and exhibit – Tulare County Museum of Farm Labor and Agriculture, Visalia, CA In-process Historical and Architectural Eligibility Evaluations of the Southern California Edison Company Historic- Era Casitas, Santa Barbara, Carpinteria, Santa Clara, and Goleta Substations In-process Historic Preservation Expert Witness, Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San Diego, U.S.D.C. Case No. 09CV0962 WQH (MDD) In-process San Diego Municipal Anglers Building Historical Resource Designation Report, San Diego, CA July 2012 National Park Service Historic American Engineering Record Level II Documentation (Large Format Negative Photography & Narrative) – SCE San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Project, Visalia, CA June 2012 Historic Structure Report - Casa Peralta, 384 West Estudillo Avenue, San Leandro, CA June 2012 County of San Diego Historic Site Designation Report, John N. Mortenson’s Hines Residence, Mt. Helix, CA April 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, Lodi Municipal Stadium, Lodi, CA March 2012 Federal Rehabilitation Certification Application – Part 3 Request for Certification of Completed Work – Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA February 2012 National Register of Historic Places Nomination, Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA February 2012 Sequoia National Forest Electric Power Conveyance Systems NRHP Eligibility Evaluations, Tulare County, CA January 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa Youth Center, La Mesa, CA December 2011 City of La Mesa 2012 General Plan Update – 2030 Historic Preservation Element, La Mesa, CA December 2011 Crown City Medical Center EIR Historical Resource Initial Study, Pasadena, CA November 2011 NHPA Section 106 Review, 4470 Acacia Avenue, La Mesa, CA September 2011 Big Creek Hydroelectric System Historic District Vincent 220kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation July 2011 Historic-Era Electric Power Conveyance Systems Programmatic Agreement (SCE, BLM, & CA, NV SHPO) (Context, Typology, Identification, Integrity Qualifications, & Treatment Processes) June 2011 Aesthetic impact Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA April 2011 Kern River – Los Angeles 60 / 66kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation, Kern & L.A. Counties December 2010 Historic Structure Report - Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA October 2010 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historic Property / Historical Resource Analysis Report of the Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA November 2010 Historic Designation Report, Burt F, Raynes Residence, 299 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista, CA August 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Vincent No. 1 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Rosamond Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Montebello, California July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Chino, California April 2010 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA March 2010 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 2 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application January 2010 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 2629 National Avenue, San Diego CA December 2009 City of Santa Ana Warner Avenue Transportation Study Historical Resource Survey, Santa Ana, CA December 2009 Proposed Heidi Square Redevelopment Project – Project Management, Preservation Planning & Subdivision Re-Design Consulting, San Lorenzo, CA November 2009 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historical Resource Review of 4102-4122 University Avenue, San Diego, CA November 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7195 Country Club Drive, La Jolla, CA November 2009 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 1 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application August 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 5511 Calumet Avenue, La Jolla, CA

4 D-27 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

August 2009 Preservation Planning Study, Site Development, & Rehabilitation Analysis of the Herman Hotel Carriage House, Chula Vista, CA August 2009 Historical Site Designation, Design Review, & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting for the Dennstedt Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Queen Avenue Dwelling, Mt. Helix, CA August 2009 CEQA and NHPA Section 106 Review of the Nike Missile Defense System - LA - 14/29 Commemorative Site, unincorporated Los Angeles, CA July 2009 Code Compliance and Historical Resource Review, 2341 Irving Avenue, San Diego, CA July 2009 City of Santa Ana Bristol & 17th Transportation Study Historical Resource Survey, Santa Ana, CA May 2009 Fresno Unified School District Historical Resource Survey of the Proposed M-4 Site, Fresno, CA May 2009 Section 106 Review of Casa Blanca – 716 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, CA April 2009 Design Review Analysis for the 2110 Glenneyre Street Property, Laguna Beach, CA April 2009 Section 106 Review of the Fairfax Theatre, Oakland, CA March 2009 Draft National Register of Historic Places Documentation & Eligibility Evaluation for the Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project, Placer County, California February 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report & Design Review – 337 Hawthorne Road, Laguna Beach, CA February 2009 San Diego Normal School Campus Phase I Preservation Planning Study & Historical Resource Survey, San Diego, CA January 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 634 2nd Avenue, Chula Vista, CA October 2008 Pier 29 National Historic Preservation Act Finding of Effects Statement, San Francisco, CA July 2007 – August 2008 Lead Consultant – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Development – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Binder (ordinance, historic inventory database, historical overview statement, incentives, project review process and related permit application and processing forms August 2008 Mayor John Gill Residence, Designation, Mills Act & Rehabilitation Consulting, San Leandro, CA July 2008 California Portland Cement Company P&H Excavators #3 & #4 Historic Context Statement & California Register Eligibility Review, Mojave, CA July 2008 Historic Context Statement – Bean Springs Site, Rosamond, CA June 2008 Cultural Resource Report & Regulatory Review, PL-SCE-Tehachapi-10H, Acton, CA May 2008 Historical Resource Documentation & Review, San Diego Aqueduct, San Diego, CA April 2008 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Goldberg Residence, 4654 Iowa Street, San Diego, CA April 2008 Storefront Improvement / Façade Revitalization Historical Resource Analysis & Design Review Assistance, 3201 Adams Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2008 Lombardi Ranch CEQA Review, San Ardo, California February 2008 Del-Sur Saugus Mining Complex Historical Resource Review, Grass Valley, CA February 2008 Foothill Ranch Historical Resource Review, Palmdale, CA January 2008 Section 106 Review 1425-1475 South Main Street, Walnut Creek, CA January 2008 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4670 Del Monte Ave., San Diego, CA November 2007 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Olmstead Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Project #531, Mt. Helix, CA October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Del Sur-Saugus Transmission Line Historical Resource Review, Lancaster - Palmdale, CA October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Antelope Substation Historical Resource Review, Lancaster, CA September 2007 Historical Resource Review & Data Responses for the Proposed SDG&E Orange Grove Energy Project in Pala, CA September 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Kaiser Pass Cabin Historic Property Assessment, Fresno Co., CA August 2007 USDA Forest Service Meeks Creeks Historic Bridge Assessment, Lake Tahoe, CA July 2007 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 433 W. Meadow Drive, Palo Alto, CA May 2007 Historic Preservation Assessment & New Project Planning and Design Consulting – 3994 Jackdaw Street, San Diego (CA) February 2007 419 Park Way Historical Resource Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA January 2007 Upper Triangle Areas Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 50 Properties over 15 City Blocks), Fresno, CA December 2006 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Charles Wakefield Cadman Residence, Mt. Helix, CA. November 2006 Historical Resource Analysis of the 4303 Narragansett Avenue Property, San Diego, CA

5 D-28 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

September 2006 Section 106 Review of the 1333 Balboa Street Property, San Francisco, CA September 2006 Section 106 Review of the Historic Delta-Mendota Canal, Los Banos, CA August 2006 Historical Evaluation Report – 2959 East Avenue, Hayward, CA June 2006 Historical Resource Analysis Report: 418-450 10th Avenue Properties, San Diego, CA May 2006 Section 106 Review of the Cocoanut Grove Building – Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, Santa Cruz, CA May 2006 Historical Resource Evaluation Report for the 70 15th Street Warehouse, San Diego, CA April 2006 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4528 Saratoga Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2006 City of Fresno Arts-Culture District Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 90-100 Properties over 18 City Blocks), Fresno, CA March 2006 South Mossdale Historic-Era House Evaluation, Lathrop, CA February 2006 Westwind Barn Historic Preservation Study, Los Altos Hills, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 2654 Mission Street Property, San Francisco, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 325 Mowry Avenue Property, Fremont, CA 94536 January 2006 Section 106 Review of Ardenwood 34551 Ardenwood Bouevard, Fremont, CA 94555 December 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1230 N Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95814 December 2005 Section 106 Review of the Sacramento City College Water Tower, Sacramento, CA November 2005 Section 106 Review of Fair Oaks Watts, 525 La Sierra Drive, Sacramento, CA November 2005 Napa Valley College Bus Shelter West Historical Resource Analysis Report, Napa, CA October 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1025 3rd Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95818 September 2005 City of Davis, Historic Anderson Bank Building Research, Documentation & Design Review Analysis, 203 G Street, Davis, CA September 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 1212 & 1214 Second Street, San Rafael, CA August 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report – Somky Property/Thompson’s Soscol Ranch, Napa, CA 94558 July 2005 Walnut Creek Women’s Club Environmental Impact Report, 1224 Lincoln Avenue, Walnut Creek, CA June 2005 Tam Property Lot Split Historic Preservation Consulting, Castro Valley, CA May 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7329-7331 Eads Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2005 Ehlers Estate Historical Resource Analysis, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St. Helena, CA March 2005 University of CA at Santa Cruz Preservation Consulting (Campus Wide Cultural Resources Inventory, Historic Context Statement – Campus Planning History) February 2005 Hall Winery Historical Resource Analysis, St. Helena, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 700 28th Avenue, San Mateo, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 312 & 318 Highland Avenue, San Mateo, CA December 2004 San Mateo Motel Historical Resource Report – Park Bayshore Townhomes – Environmental Impact Report (Revised February 2005) November 2004 Historical Evaluation of the San Mateo Motel, 801 South Bayshore Boulevard, San Mateo, CA October 2004 Stonegate Homes Subdivision Plan, and Single-and-Multi-Family Dwellings Design Review, San Mateo, CA September 2004 University of CA at Santa Cruz, Getty Campus Heritage Grant Application September 2004 City of Riverside Downtown Fire Station No.1 Cultural Resources Analysis, Riverside, CA August 2004 Residential Remodel Design Review – Glazenwood Historic District Contributor, 929 Laurel Avenue, San Mateo, CA August 2004 Odd Fellows Hall, Historic Structure Report, 113 South B Street, San Mateo, CA (with Conservator Seth Bergstein) July 2004 Design Review Analysis – Schneider’s Building, 208 East Third Street, San Mateo, CA 94401 July 2004 Embarcadero Cove Development Project Initial Study – Preliminary Historical Resource Analysis, Oakland, CA 94606 July 2004 Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 4830 Cape May Avenue, San Diego, CA 92107 (Revised January 2005) June 2004 City of Monterey Alvarado Street Mixed-Use Project - APE Survey, Monterey, CA June 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 450 Frederick Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 June 2004 Design Review Analysis – 117 Clark Drive, San Mateo, CA 94402 May 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 426 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 April 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 1272 42nd Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122 April 2004 City of Fresno Broadway Row Historical Resource Survey, Fresno, CA

6 D-29 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

March 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 117 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 March 2004 Historical Evaluation Of The Fresno Republican/McMahan’s Building, 2030 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721 February 2004 Crocker Bank Building Preservation Planning Considerations Memorandum January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 501 Walnut Street Residence, San Carlos, CA 94070 January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 20 Madison Avenue and 29 Hobart Avenue Properties, San Mateo, CA 94402 January 2004 Historical Evaluation Of The Residence Located At 571 Valley Street, San Francisco, CA January 2004 Historical Evaluation Of The 3925 20th Street Residence, San Francisco, CA 94131 November 2003 Historical Evaluation of Commercial Building Located at 1022 El Camino Real, San Carlos, CA November 2003 Peer Review Statement for the K & T Foods Building, 451 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA November 2003 Historical Evaluation of the Greer-O’Brine Property, 51 Encina Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, November 2003 Embarcadero Hotel Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis and Design Review Statement October 2003 City of San Leandro Historical Resources Survey, Historic Context Statement, Historic Preservation Ordinance, and Draft Historic Preservation Benefits/Incentive Program August 2003 Palm Theater Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis July 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The First Christian Church Building, 2701 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403 June 2003 Alameda Naval Air Station Reuse Project Historic Preservation Regulatory and Policy Memorandum (Prepared for Alameda Point Community Partners-Master Developer for NAS Alameda) May 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The Residence Located At 606 Dorchester Road, San Mateo, CA March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 40’ x 80’ Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center) March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 6’ x 6’ Supersonic Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center) March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory Administration Building National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center) March 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The Residence Located At 1015 South Grant Street, San Mateo, CA February 2003 8th & Market, 10 United Nations Plaza, Cell Site Impact Review, San Francisco, CA February 2003 Existing Conditions and Subdivision Design Alternatives For The Proposed Hayman Homes Tract No. 7267, Proctor Road, Castro Valley, CA February 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The Residence Located At 336 West Poplar Avenue, San Mateo, CA January 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The Residence Located At 744 Occidental Avenue, San Mateo, CA January 2003 Historical Evaluation Of The 131 and 141 West Third Avenue Apartment Buildings, San Mateo, CA December 2002 CA State Capitol Building, Historical Resource Review, Sacramento, CA November 2002 Wireless Antenna Site Review, Medical Arts Building, 2000 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA October 2002 Historical Evaluation Of The LeDucq Winery Estate, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St. Helena, CA 94574 (Revised June 2003) October 2002 Historical Assessment Of The St. Patrick’s Parish Community Building Located At 3585 30th Street, San Diego, CA, 92104 September 2002 Historical Assessment Of The Building Located At 4257 Third Street, San Diego, CA, April 2002 Historical Assessment Of The Building Located At 3567 Ray Street, San Diego, CA, October 2001 Historical Assessment Of The Gustafson’s Furniture Building Located At 2930 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92104 September 2001 Historical Review Of Lots A, B, K & L, Block 93, Horton’s Addition Lockling, San Diego, CA August 2001 Core Inventory Of All Sites Appearing To Be More Than 45 Years Of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared For Centre City Development Corporation) August 2001 Urbana Project Abstract Bibliography (Prepared for Dr. Roger Caves, San Diego State University and San Diego State University Foundation) July 2001 Historical Assessment Of The Kirkland Apartments Building Located At 2309 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA, 92103 July 2001 Historical Assessment Of The Building Located At 4230 Maryland Street, San Diego, CA, 92103 (With Kathleen A. Crawford) June 2001 Historical Assessment Of The 2525-2529, 2537-2547, 2561 First Avenue Residences, San Diego, CA 92103 May 2001 Update Of The November 1988 Historic Site Inventory Of Centre City East For Centre City Development Corporation (with Scott Moomjian)

7 D-30 WENDY L. TINSLEY BECKER, RPH, AICP, PRINCIPAL [email protected]

April 2001 East Village Inventory Of All Sites Appearing To Be More Than 45 Years Of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared For Centre City Development Corporation) April 2001 Update Of The May 1989 Historic Site Inventory Of Bayside For Centre City Development Corporation January 2001 Historic Survey Report Of The Former Teledyne-Ryan Aeronautical Complex 2701 North Harbor Drive San Diego, CA 92101(with Scott Moomjian) January 2001 Historical Assessment Of The Fletcher-Salmons Building 602-624 Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101 December 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site, Alternative 1 Site, and Alternative 2 Site November 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Edison/Hamilton/Parks Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites November 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Adams/Franklin Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Site October 2000 The National Register of Historic Places Travel Itinerary; Old Town San Diego August 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites July 2000 Cultural Resource Report, 52nd Street Area Elementary School Preferred & Alternative Sites, San Diego, CA July 2000 Historical Assessment Of The 3658 Warner Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92106 July 2000 Historical Assessment Of The 367 Catalina Boulevard Residence, San Diego, CA 92106 July 2000 Historical Assessment Of The 906 West Lewis Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92103 May 2000 Historical Assessment Of The 501-503, 507 and 509 14th Street Residences, San Diego, CA May 2000 The San Diego Flume Company System Redwood Pipeline, San Diego County, CA March 2000 Historical Assessment of The Society For Crippled Children’s Hydrotherapy Gymnasium Located at 851 South 35th Street, San Diego, CA 92113 (with Scott Moomjian)

8 D-31 END

D-32