Available online at: www.cbioresearch.com/journal.html ISSN No. 0973-8207 Anthropogenic impacts on the water quality of river Cauvery around city, Tamilnadu

V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy* P.G and Research Department of Environmental Sciences Bishop Heber College, Tiruchirappalli -17 *(E-mail: [email protected])

Abstract Periodical determination of water quality and assessment of the various threats to our fresh waters, especially rivers, is mandatory for conserving it. Hence the present work has been designed to determine certain important water quality parameters (pH, EC, TDS, turbidity, DO, COD, BOD, alkalinity, hardness, chloride and coliform status) and the threats to river Cauvery, from Upper anaicut to Grand anaicut (about 30km) during the months of June to December, 2009. From this study it is noted that the water is moderately polluted. Anthropogenic activities (industrial, commercial, occupational, social, public and individual) contribute to the water pollution, which needs stringent and immediate action.

Keyword: Sewage, solid wastes, water quality parameters, riverine systems, economic loss and water borne diseases.

Introduction 2000 and Kalavathy et al., 2011). The evaluation of the water quality periodically and frequently is Rivers have the distinction of changing mandatory to prevent further degradation and to barbarians into civilized-men. Man has always make the best use of the available resources. preferred to live nearer to the riverine systems due Hence the quality of water and anthropogenic to the enriched water resources, vast flats for impacts around Tiruchirappalli city was chosen for agricultural activities and easy mobility through this study. water ways (Thirugnanamoorthy, 2001). Only when the population has exploded beyond the limit, man Materials and Methods started spreading over to the other areas. While The study area in the river Cauvery, the riverine ecosystems have excellent prospects, extended between Upper anaicut and Grand these are equally prone to disasters like flooding, anaicut, about 15km on either side of Tiruchirappalli soil salinity, soil erosion and land subsidence city. Samples were taken in the alternative months (Ramasamy, 2001). Today, this ecosystem suffers (June-Dec 2009) from the following four sampling from the twin assaults of water depletion and spots:- degradation leading to drought and diseases respectively. Hence the studies on the reverine 1. Upper anaicut (Mukkombu): Flood control water systems have always remained an area of greater reservoir cum picnic spot significance. 2. Kambarasampettai: Water pumping stations and Cauvery is one of the perennial rivers upstream of Trichy city supporting the economy of Tamilnadu. The holistic 3. Bypass bridge: Down stream of Trichy city and development of Tiruchirappalli city can be attributed sewage confluence points to the supporting water resource of river Cauvery. 4. Grand anaicut (Kallanai): Flood control water On the other hand the city discharges its wastes reservoir cum picnic spot impairing the water quality. Many human activities Through grab sampling method, water such as industries, agriculture, transport and samples were collected in clean plastic containers sewage from residential areas along with cultural from all stations between 6a.m. and 8a.m. For the and religious practices pollute the river (Jayaram, analysis of coliform bacteria, sterilized plastic 39

Journal of Basic and Applied Biology, Vol. 7, No.1, 2013, pp. 39-45 ©2012, by the Centre for Biological Research, Puthalam, 629 602, TN, V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy containers were used and stored in ice packs BOD and COD of all the samples in all during the transit. Vulnerable parameters such as the months were found to be beyond the prescribed pH, DO were determined in the field and all other guidelines. parameters (physico-chemical and bacteriological) in the laboratory as prescribed by APHA (1998). Water for drinking purposes should be Also results were compared with drinking water devoid of coliforms (Harilal and Sasikala, 2004). In quality standards (BIS, 1991 and CPCB, 2008). the present study, total coliform and fecal coliform All the anthropogenic activities were recorded counts of water samples were found to be very through enquiry from the available local resources high (table 1- 4). Total coliform count is commonly and personal observations. used as an indicator of water safety, showing the presence of other pathogenic organisms. Major Results and Discussion coliform bacteria causing gastroenteritis include In the present study pH values (7.9 – 8.5) Shigella, E. coli, and Salmonella, which causes fall within the prescribed limits (table 1-4). Krishna dysentery, urinary tract infections, diarrhea and et al., (2004) report that the pH value of river Bhadra vomiting (Kilmaren, 2011). to be 7.45. The Uyyakondan channel of Identified Anthropogenic Activities and their Tiruchirappalli city exhibited mild alkalinity (7.3 – Impacts 8.3) in a similar study (Kalavathy et al.,2011 and Jeena et al., 2012). A. Industrial, commercial and occupational exploitations EC values ranges between 670 - 982µS/ cm in the alternative months of June – Dec. In 1. Manufacturing industries earlier observation almost in the same area, the Closer to the sampling stations, there are EC range had been between 712 – 1025 µS/cm no major industries directly situated on the banks during summer (Sharma, 2009). of the river. Yet paper, dyeing, sugar, cement, diary, TDS ranges between 429 - 628mg/l. The tannery and distillery industries situated on the TDS value (513mg/L), at the By-pass bridge various directions, may influence the water quality exceeded the limit (500mg/L). indirectly through different water channels. Regarding impacts on the water quality, all the The average turbidity values of all the above mentioned industries have been grouped sampling stations exceeded the limit (5.0NTU). under red category by MoEF (1999). One of the distilleries located close to the sampling station Total hardness of all the samples in all at Bypass Bridge, discharge its treated effluents the months was within the limit (300mg/L). Lalitha in the Uyyakondan channel, a tributary of river et al., (2003) in an earlier study recorded the Cauvery. The impact is felt more during the rainy hardness range to be 200 – 750mg/L in the Cauvery season. water. Considerable changes are found in the The Alkalinity of all the sampling stations pH(Fig.1), EC(Fig.2), TDS(Fig.3), Turbidity(Fig.4), exceeded the limits (200mg/L). Jeyaram (2000) total hardness(Fig.5), DO(Fig.8), COD(Fig.9), and supported our observations through an earlier study BOD(Fig.10). The public report that at times the in the same river. Similar observations are also river water appeared colored and at these times reported by Rajurkar et al., (2003) in the water dermal and digestive disorders occurred. When this quality status of river Umkhrah at Shilong. water was irrigated the agriculture productivity was Observed values of chlorides were within the limit affected. (250mg/L). 2. Cottage industries In the present study, the DO levels of all the samples were well above prescribed limit Thatching and coir making activities are (6.0mg/l) excluding the bypass bridge during distributed randomly on the river banks especially December (table 1 - 4). between Mukkombu and Kambarasampettai.

40 V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy When the raw materials such as coconut leaves heavy metals from the benthic region, lowering of and fibres are soaked within or on the banks, the water table, change in the water course, reduction water soluble compounds viz. flavonoids, lignin, of self-purification capacity, disruption of the cellulose, phenols, sugar, tannins, amino acids, distribution and metabolism of aquatic organisms etc., (James et al., 2009 and Isreal et al., 2011) and impaired food chain of the riverine ecosystems diffuse in to the river. are the possible impacts of sand dredging.

3. Agriculture Because of the frequency and heavy weight of the trucks, roads are damaged and fatal The northern bank of the river is cultivated accidents occur. The local daily news papers often intensively with the wetland crops such as paddy, report this. banana, sugarcane, greens, vegetables, black gram and green gram. Various manures, synthetic B. Social and Public Abuses fertilizers, pesticides and growth regulators from 1. Water pumping stations the crop fields reach the river as runoff more during the rainy season, than due to irrigation. DDT(pp), All the villages, towns and cities situated chlordane and endosulfan have been estimated to on the banks of the river Cauvery are supplied with be in considerable quantities in the delta areas of the water, which is pumped out from the bore wells the river Cauvery (Kalavathy, 2009). The pH, DO, within the river. The ‘Ramanathapuram Combined EC, nitrogen and phosphorous of the water are Drinking water Scheme’ supplies water to the considerably affected. Algal blooms also Ramanathapuram district. Other beneficiaries are aggravates the situation (Jayaram, 2000). residents of Trichy, , , Pudukottai, Karaikudi, etc., The water table lowers 4. Fishing down due to constant pumping out of water in Inland fishing is one of the chief various points of the river at the same time. occupations of the river bank dwellers. Upper anicut 2. Sewage discharges (Mukkombu) and Grand anicut (Kallanai) are commercial fishing stations and in other stations Point and non-point sources of sewage also fishing is common. At all sampling stations discharges are found throughout the study area. fish diversity has been observed to be very high Private septic tank cleaners discharge the (Herbivorous:- Catla, Labeo, Cirrhinus; collected sewage in the nearby water bodies Omnivorous:- Oreochromis, Puntius; illegally. Chemicals such as detergents and heavy Carnivorous:- Mystus, Clarius, Glossogobius, metals carried by the sewage increase the total Channa, Heteropneustes). If inland fishing is solids (Fig.3 & 4), organic matters and other promoted in this area, problems of occupation and oxygen demanding wastes (Fig.9 & 10) in the water. malnutrition can be solved simultaneously. Total and fecal coliforms are very heavy in the river water (Fig.11 & 12). Bhardwag (2005), Verma and Destructive fishing practices such as blast Saksena (2010) and Jeena et al., (2012) also report fishing with the use of dynamite and homemade the impact of the sewage water on the water quality bombs has been observed at times. Blast fishing of various water bodies. releases concentrated toxins which kill both target 3. Solid waste dumping and non-target organisms, including non-target fish, invertebrates, as well as eggs, larvae, and From time immemorial rivers are dumping microorganism (McClellan, 2008). yards of all domestic and public unwanted materials (rags, canes, pottery, plastic bags, 5. Sand dredging sachets, garbage, etc). Dumping yards for want of Heavy mechanical sand dredging using space are increasing in the river banks throughout earth movers and manual dredging through cart the study area. Frequent disturbance by rag loads have been observed on either sides of the pickers, animals, birds etc. and burning of the river legally and illegally. Increase of turbidity and wastes, spoil the quality of river water especially suspended solids of water, release of toxins and during rains.

41 V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy 4. Religious activities 4. Cattle wading and waste burning Animal dungs contribute nitrogen (urea), During the temple and river oriented phosphorous, organic matter and pathogens to the festivals such as ‘Aadi perukku’, ‘Vinayagar river. Grasses and solid wastes, burning on the sathurth’i, ‘Thula snanam’, ‘Vaikuntha aegadesi’, river banks and inside of the river are also polluters ‘Masi magam’, ‘Margazhi neerattu’, etc., mass of water. bathing and discharging of idols, burning lamps, cloths & rags, flowers, leaves, vegetables & fruits, Conclusion sprouted grains, hair shavings, polythene bags & Based on the observations of the present containers, etc., are observed. The decomposition study and comparison with CPCB and BIS drinking of these wastes add upto organic load of the river. water standards, it may be concluded that river Invariably burial grounds, burning sheds Cauvery is moderately polluted due to three and electric crematorium are situated on the river categories of anthropogenic activities – A. banks. Performance of last rights and annual thidi industrial, commercial and occupational (death day), etc., discharge of bones, ashes, exploitations, B. social and public abuses and C. pottery, along with flowers, fruits & leaves and individual misuses. The regulation of industrial cooked foods, etc. are the death related activities discharges from category A, sewage and solid resulting in eutrophication and oxygen depletion. wastes dumping from category B and defecation Calcium and phosphorous content of water are and detergent use from category C need intense, supplemented by ashes and bones leading to algal stringent and immediate action by government blooms. authorities and full support from the stakeholders of the riverine systems, failing which various forms C. Individual Misuses of health issues and economic loss have to be 1. Open defecation faced. The unpleasant and unhygienic action of open defecation has been observed in all the Table 1: Variations in the water quality sampling stations. During the rainy seasons the parameters at Upper Anaicut defecated dry material for away from the river bank Parameter Jun Aug Oct Dec Avg also finds its ways into the river. pH 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.5 8.3 EC(µS/cm) 677 802 726 763 742 Bad odor and unpleasant feelings, algal TDS(mg/L) 433 513 465 488 475 Turbidity(NTU) 12.3 4.4 23 9.2 12.2 blooms and water borne diseases result out of open Hardness(mg/L) 200 180 135 187 176 defecation. Very high TC and FC has been observed Alkalinity(mg/L) 300 240 198 220 240 Chloride(mg/L) 95 80 87 85.2 86.8 in our study and is also supported by Bhardwag DO (mg/L) 7.7 7.2 6.6 7.3 7.2 (2005). BOD (mg/L) 4 4.4 1.8 2.1 3.1 COD (mg/L) 28 32 24 20 26 2. Washing and cleaning T.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 240x10 3 350x10 3 17x10 3 28x10 3 159x10 3 F.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 270 x10 2 1700x10 2 12x10 2 22x10 2 501x10 2 Bathing, vessels cleaning, washing cloths by individuals and professionals (launderer), Table 2: Variations in the water quality vehicular cleanings at all levels (Trucks to bicycles) parameters at Kambarasampettai etc., are the activities seen either singly or together Parameter Jun Aug Oct Dec Avg at various intensities in all the sampling stations pH 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.3 releasing adequate amount of detergents. EC(µS/cm) 670 765 784 770 747 TDS(mg/L) 429 490 502 493 479 Turbidity(NTU) 13.4 4.6 14 9.5 10.4 Detergents can have poisonous effects in Hardness(mg/L) 205 160 169 196 183 all types of aquatic life. Automobile cleaning Alkalinity(mg/L) 260 240 250 218 242 Chloride(mg/L) 85 82 83 84 83.5 releases oil & grease upon the water surface which DO (mg/L) 7.7 7.7 6.5 7.1 7.3 abstracts the surface activities on the aquatic BOD (mg/L) 3 4.5 2 2.5 3 COD (mg/L) 20 28 20 28 24 animals (Verma and Saksena, 2010). T.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 790 x10 3 220x10 3 127x10 3 35x10 3 293x10 3 F.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 1700 x10 2 330x10 2 67x10 2 29x10 2 531x10 2

42 V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy Table 3: Variations in the water quality Table 4: Variations in the water quality parameters at Grand Anaicut parameters at Bypass Bridge

Parameter Jun Aug Oct Dec Avg Parameter Jun Aug Oct Dec Avg pH 7.9 8.2 8.3 7.9 8.1 pH 8.2 8.4 8.2 8.2 8.3 EC(µS/cm) 788 753 686 982 802 EC(µS/cm) 721 750 742 740 738 TDS(mg/L) 504 482 439 628 513 TDS(mg/L) 461 480 475 474 473 Turbidity(NTU) 15.3 4.5 4.7 17 10.4 Turbidity(NTU) 11.2 3 9.2 8.2 7.9 Hardness(mg/L) 260 140 160 239 200 Hardness(mg/L) 240 170 178 188 194 Alkalinity(mg/L) 280 240 229 258 252 Alkalinity(mg/L) 300 260 220 199 245 Chloride(mg/L) 75 70 54 121 80 Chloride(mg/L) 60 68 69 86 70.8 DO (mg/L) 7.7 7.2 7.1 5 6.8 DO (mg/L) 7.3 6.1 7.1 6.9 6.9 BOD (mg/L) 5.4 4.7 3.3 4 4.4 BOD (mg/L) 4.8 4.3 4 2.8 4 COD (mg/L) 20 36 16 36 27 COD (mg/L) 28 32 20 24 26 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 T.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 2200x10 180x10 149x10 32x10 640x10 T.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 1700 x10 110x10 70x10 22x10 475x10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 F.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 1100 x10 170x10 74x10 19x10 340x10 F.Coliform(MPN/100ml) 700x10 90x10 63x10 17x10 217x10

Bimonthly variations in the water quality parameters of stational average (2009)

43 V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy

Bimonthly variations in the water quality parameters of stational average (2009)

References

APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the BIS. 1991. Indian Standards Specifications for Examination of Water and Wastewater. Drinking Water. Bureau of Indian American Public Health Association/American Standards, New Delhi, India. IS: 10500. Water Works Association/Water Environment CPCB. 2008. Environmental Standards – Water Federation, 20th edn, Washington DC, USA Quality Criteria. Central Pollution Control Bhardwaj, R.M. 2005. Water Quality Monitoring in Board, New Delhi, India.http://cpcb.nic.in/ India-Achievements and Contraints, IWG- Water_Quality_Criteria.php. Env, International work Session on Water Statistics, Vienna, June 20-22. 44 V. Jeena and S. Kalavathy Elisabeth Kilmaren. 2011. Symptoms from Drinking Lalitha, S; Kasthuri, R; Kalaivani, D; Banumathi, Coliform Bacteria in Water. K; and Akilandeshwari, L. 2003. Impact http://www.livestrong.com/article/123179- of Sewage Disposal on Quality of Water symptoms-drinking-coliform-bacteria- near Chinthamani, Tiruchirappalli. IJEP. water/ 23: 1268-1271. Harilal, C.C. and Sasikala, K. 2004. “Bacterial MoEF. 1999. Uniform consent procedure rules, Contamination of Well Water In and Prevention and Control of Pollution. Around Thiruvalla Municipal District”, IJEP. Schedule VIII, Rule3(2) and 12, Ministry 24(1): 25-29. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi. Ibidun James, A., Olatunji Gabrial and Atolani Rajurkar, N.S., Nongbri B. and Patwardhan A.M. Olubunmi. 2009. Propylethanoate 2003. Water Quality Status of River Derivative from Coconut coir, Res. J. Appl. Umkhrah at Shillong. IJEP. 23 (9): 990 – Sci. 4(6):217-220. 998. Israel, A.U. Ogali, R.E., Akaranta, O. and Obot, Ramasamy, SM. 2001. Life History of Cauvery river, I.B. 2011. Extraction and characterization India – A remote sensing perspective, The of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) coir dust. Cauvery – A living Museum, Seminar Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 33 (6), proceedings, St. Joseph College, 717-724. Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu. Jayaram, K.C. 2000. Riverine System: An Sharma, TR. 2009. Water Quality Assessment of environmental study. The Madras Science River Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli Region, Foundation, Chennai. Tamilnadu. M.Phil., Thesis, Dept. of Jeena, V., Rakesh Sharma, T. and Kalavsthy, S. Environmental and Herbal Science, Tamil 2012. Impacts of Municipal Sewage on the University, . River Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli city, Thirugnanamoorthy. 2001. The Cauvery-Sangam Tamilnadu. Life Sciences Leaflets. 10: 10- period records, The Cauvery – A living 18. Museum, Seminar proceedings, St. Kalavathy, S. 2009. Water Quality Monitoring of Joseph College, Tiruchirappalli, River Cauvery: A Project Report submitted Tamilnadu. to Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, Vangala Krishna, Ashwin Sabapathy and Chennai. Chakravarty, P. 2004. “Impact study on Kalavathy.S.,Rakesh Sharma.T.,And Bhadra river water quality by pulp and Sureshkumar. P.2011. Water Quality paper mill effluents”, IJEP. 24 (1): 14-17. Index of River Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli Verma, A.K. and Saksena, D.N. 2010. Assessment district, Tamilnadu Arch. Environ. Sci. 5, of Water Quality and Pollution status of 55-61. Kalpi (Morar) river, Gwalior, Madhya Kate McClellan. 2008. Conservation Biology: Coral Pradesh: with special reference to Degradation through Destructive fishing Conservation and Management plan, practices, the encyclopedia of Earth. Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci., 1(2):419-429.

* Author for correspondence

45