DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 505 Medical Marihuana Act Data Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 505 Medical Marihuana Act Data Report Marijuana Regulatory Agency Statistical Report For Fiscal Year 2020 Pursuant to MCL 333.27302(l), MCL 333.27702, MCL 333.27957(f), MCL 333.26426(i), and Section 505 of 2020 PA 166 December 9, 2020 Governor Executive Director Director Gretchen Whitmer Andrew Brisbo Orlene Hawks Table of Contents Medical Marijuana Facility Licensing ..................................................................................... 5 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 5 2. Executive Background ................................................................................................. 7 Required for MCL 333.27302(l) and 333.27702 ...................................................................... 8 3. Patterns of Marijuana Transfers ................................................................................... 8 4. Gross Revenue Collected ............................................................................................ 8 5. Costs of Administering the Medical Marijuana Facilities Licensing Program ................. 9 6. Actions Taken by the MRA ........................................................................................... 9 Required for Section 505 of 2020 PA 166 ..............................................................................10 7. Number of Prequalification & Facility Operating License Applications Received .........10 8. Number of Initial Applications Approved & Denied ......................................................10 9. Average Time to Process an Initial Application ............................................................11 10. Number of Renewal Applications Approved ................................................................12 11. Number of Renewal Applications Received .................................................................13 12. Number of Renewal Applications Denied ....................................................................14 13. Average Time to Process a Renewal Application ........................................................14 14. Initial Applications not Processed within Established Time Requirements ...................14 15. Renewal Applications not Processed within Established Time Requirements .............14 16. Revenue Collected ......................................................................................................15 17. Costs of Administering the Medical Marijuana Facilities Licensing Program ................16 18. Registered Name and Address of All Licensed Facilities .............................................16 19. Number of Complaints Received .................................................................................32 20. Description of Types of Complaints Received .............................................................32 21. Description of Process Used to Resolve Complaints ...................................................32 22. Number of Investigations Opened ...............................................................................32 23. Number of Investigations Closed .................................................................................32 24. Average Time to Complete an Investigation ................................................................33 25. Number of Enforcement Actions ..................................................................................33 26. Description of the Types of Enforcement Actions Taken .............................................33 27. Number of Administrative Hearing Adjudications .........................................................33 28. List of Fees Charged ...................................................................................................34 29. Demographic Information ............................................................................................34 30. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................38 2 | P a g e Adult-Use Establishment Licensing ......................................................................................39 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................39 2. Executive Background ................................................................................................40 Required for Section 7 of the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act ...............41 3. Number of State Licenses of Each Class Issued .........................................................41 4. Demographic Information on Licensees ......................................................................42 5. Enforcement and Disciplinary Actions Taken ..............................................................46 6. Gross Revenue Collected ...........................................................................................46 7. Costs of Administering the Adult-Use Marijuana Licensing Program ...........................47 Required for Section 505 of 2020 PA 166 ..............................................................................48 8. Number of Prequalification & Establishment License Applications Received ...............48 9. Number of Initial Applications Approved & Denied ......................................................49 10. Average Time to Process an Initial Application ............................................................51 11. Number of Renewal Applications Approved ................................................................51 12. Number of Renewal Applications Received .................................................................52 13. Number of Renewal Applications Denied ....................................................................52 14. Average Time to Process a Renewal Application ........................................................52 15. Initial Applications not Processed within Established Time Requirements ...................53 16. Renewal Applications not Processed within Established Time Requirements .............53 17. Revenue Collected ......................................................................................................53 18. Costs of Administering the Adult-Use Marijuana Licensing Program ...........................57 19. Registered Name and Address of All Licensed Facilities .............................................58 20. Number of Complaints Received .................................................................................69 21. Description of Types of Complaints Received .............................................................69 22. Description of the Process Used to Resolve Complaints .............................................69 23. Number of Investigations Opened ...............................................................................69 24. Number of Investigations Closed .................................................................................69 25. Average Time to Complete an Investigation ................................................................70 26. Number of Enforcement Actions ..................................................................................70 27. Description of Types of Enforcement Actions Taken ...................................................70 28. Number of Administrative Hearing Adjudications .........................................................70 29. List of Fees Charged ...................................................................................................71 30. Social Equity Applications ...........................................................................................72 31. Social Equity Education & Outreach ............................................................................72 32. Social Equity Application Assistance Provided ............................................................73 33. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................73 3 | P a g e Medical Marijuana Registry Program ....................................................................................74 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................74 2. Executive Background ................................................................................................76 Required for MCL 333.26426(i) .............................................................................................77 3. Number of Applications Filed for Registry Identification Cards ....................................77 4. Number of Qualifying Patients and Primary Caregivers Approved in Each County. .....78 5. Nature of the Debilitating Medical Conditions of the Qualifying Patients. .....................79 6. Number of Registry Identification Cards Revoked. ......................................................80 7. Number of Physicians Providing Written Certifications for Qualifying Patients .............80 Required for Section 505 of 2020 PA 166 ..............................................................................81 8. Number of Initial Applications Received ......................................................................81 9. Number of Applications Approved & Denied ................................................................81 10. Average Time to Process an Initial Application ............................................................82
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Large Impact Crater Histories of Mars: the Effect of Different Model Crater Age Techniques ⇑ Stuart J
    Icarus 225 (2013) 173–184 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Large impact crater histories of Mars: The effect of different model crater age techniques ⇑ Stuart J. Robbins a, , Brian M. Hynek a,b, Robert J. Lillis c, William F. Bottke d a Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States b Department of Geological Sciences, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States c UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States d Southwest Research Institute and NASA Lunar Science Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, United States article info abstract Article history: Impact events that produce large craters primarily occurred early in the Solar System’s history because Received 25 June 2012 the largest bolides were remnants from planet ary formation .Determi ning when large impacts occurred Revised 6 February 2013 on a planetary surface such as Mars can yield clues to the flux of material in the early inner Solar System Accepted 25 March 2013 which, in turn, can constrain other planet ary processes such as the timing and magnitude of resur facing Available online 3 April 2013 and the history of the martian core dynamo. We have used a large, global planetary databas ein conjunc- tion with geomorpholog icmapping to identify craters superposed on the rims of 78 larger craters with Keywords: diameters D P 150 km on Mars, 78% of which have not been previously dated in this manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 17 Press
    7A-/ a NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington. D . C . 20546 202-755-8370 FOR RELEASE: Sunday t RELEASE NO: 72-220K November 26. 1972 B PROJECT: APOLLO 17 (To be launched no P earlier than Dec . 6) R E contents 1-5 6-13 U APOLLC 17 MISSION OBJECTIVES .............14 LAUNCH OPERATIONS .................. 15-17 COUNTDOWN ....................... 18-21 Launch Windows .................. 20 3 Ground Elapsed Time Update ............ 20-21 LAUNCH AND MISSION PROFILE .............. 22-32 Launch Events .................. 24-26 Mission Events .................. 26-28 EVA Mission Events ................ 29-32 APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE ................ 33-36 LUNAR SURFACE SCIENCE ................ 37-55 S-IVB Lunar Impact ................ 37 ALSEP ...................... 37 K SNAP-27 ..................... 38-39 Heat Flow Experiment ............... 40 Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites ........... 41 Lunar Seismic Profiling ............. 41-42 I Lunar Atmospheric Composition Experiment ..... 43 Lunar Surface Gravimeter ............. 43-44 Traverse Gravimeter ............... 44-45 Surface Electrical Properties 45 I-) .......... T Lunar Neutron Probe ............... 46 1 Soil Mechanics .................. 46-47 Lunar Geology Investigation ........... 48-51 Lunar Geology Hand Tools ............. 52-54 Long Term Surface Exposure Experiment ...... 54-55 -more- November 14. 1972 i2 LUNAR ORBITAL SCIENCE ............... .5 6.61 Lunar Sounder ................. .5 6.57 Infrared Scanning Radiometer ......... .5 7.58 Far-Ultraviolet Spectrometer ..........5
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual and History
    MIRATOR 11:1/2010 1 Ritual and History: Pagan Rites in the Story of the Princess’ Revenge (the Russian Primary Chronicle, under 945–946) 1 Aleksandr Koptev Introduction The Kievan prince Igor is known to have been murdered by tribesmen of the tributary Drevljans during a journey he made to their country with the purpose of collecting the tribute. The case is described in the Primary Chronicle under the year 945: 6453 (945). In this year, Igor’s retinue said to him, ‘The servants of Sveinald are adorned with weapons and fine raiment, but we are naked. Go forth with us, oh Prince, after tribute, that both you and we may profit thereby’. Igor´ heeded their words, and he attacked Dereva in search of tribute. He sought to increase the previous tribute and collected it by violence from the people with the assistance of his followers. After thus gathering the tribute, he returned to his city. On his homeward way, he said to his followers, after some reflection, ‘Go forward with the tribute. I shall turn back, and rejoin you later’. He dismissed his retainers on their journey homeward, but being desirous of still greater booty he returned on his tracks with a few of his followers. The Derevlians heard that he was again approaching, and consulted with Mal, their prince, saying, ‘If a wolf comes among the sheep, he will take away the whole flock one by one, unless he be killed. If we do not thus kill him now, he will destroy us all’. They 1 The article is based on my paper ‘Water and Fire as the Road to the Mythic Other World: Princess Olga and the Murdered Ambassadors in the Russian Primary Chronicle, under 945’ delivered at the Septième Colloque International d’anthropologie du monde indo-européen et de mythologie comparée “Routes et parcours mythiques: des textes à l’archéologie”, Louvain-la-Neuve, March 19–21, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensible Straw
    SENSIBLE STRAW EXPLORING INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STRAW BALE BUILDING IN SWEDEN Emelie Sandmer & Isabelle Sjöberg Master´s thesis at Chalmers Architecture Design for Sustainable Development Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden 2015 SENSIBLE STRAW EXPLORING INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STRAW BALE BUILDING IN SWEDEN Emelie Sandmer - Isabelle Sjöberg Master’s Thesis at Chalmers Architecture Master’s Programme Design for Sustainable Development Chalmers University of Technology 412 96 Gothenburg Tel: +46 (0) 31-772 10 00 Examiner: Lena Falkheden Tutor: John Helmfridsson June 2015 © Emelie Sandmer & Isabelle Sjöberg, 2015 Changing the world, one straw at a time PREFACE seed was planted some years ago to look Acknowledgements to Torbjörn Svensson at Becohus closer at straw bale construction. Attending and representatives from PEAB and NCC. Further A a practical course in straw bale construction, thanks to Thomas Henrikson at Malmömässan at Slöjd & Byggnadsvård in the spring of 2014, was and Marius Tarvydas at Ecococon. Appreciations a large stepping stone for the realization and the to Miljöbyggsystem for providing material for the formation of this master’s thesis. psychical model of the “Sensible Straw” wall element. Thanks to other architects around the world for This master’s thesis would not be possible without sharing their thoughts about the straw bale building the help from skilled individuals and companies, technique. and therefore we want to thank everyone who has contributed to our work. Special thanks Finally, special acknowledgements to ModCell® to our supervisor John Helmfridsson, Liljewall and Finlay White for welcoming us and sharing arkitekter, for supporting us along this journey. thoughts and ideas throughout the process of this Furthermore appreciations to our examiner Lena master’s thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Young Martian Ray Craters Have Ages Consistent with the Crater Count System?
    Icarus 208 (2010) 621–635 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Do young martian ray craters have ages consistent with the crater count system? William K. Hartmann a,*, Cathy Quantin b, Stephanie C. Werner c, Olga Popova d a Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719-2395, United States b Laboratoire des Sciences de la Terre, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon1, 2, rue Raphaël Dubois, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France c Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, PO 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway d Institute for Dynamics of Geospheres, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 38, Bldg. 1, 119334 Moscow, Russia article info abstract Article history: McEwen et al. (McEwen, A.S., Preblich, B.S., Turtle, E.P., Artemieva, N.A., Golombek, M.P., Hurst, M., Kirk, Received 9 September 2009 R.L., Burr, D.M., Christensen, P. [2005]. Icarus 176, 351–381) developed a useful test for the internal con- Revised 19 February 2010 sistency of crater-count chronometry systems. They argued that certain multi-kilometer, fresh-looking Accepted 24 March 2010 martian craters with prominent rays should be the youngest or near-youngest craters in their size range. Available online 21 April 2010 The ‘‘McEwen et al. test” is that the ages determined from crater densities of the smallest superimposed craters (typically diameter D 5–20 m) should thus be comparable to the expected formation intervals Keywords: of the host primary. McEwen et al. concluded from MOC data that crater chronometry failed this test by Crater chronology factors of 700–2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Stratigraphy, and Origin of Husband Hill, Columbia Hills, Gusev Crater, Mars T
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, E06S03, doi:10.1029/2007JE003041, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Structure, stratigraphy, and origin of Husband Hill, Columbia Hills, Gusev Crater, Mars T. J. McCoy,1 M. Sims,2 M. E. Schmidt,1 L. Edwards,2 L. L. Tornabene,3 L. S. Crumpler,4 B. A. Cohen,5 L. A. Soderblom,6 D. L. Blaney,7 S. W. Squyres,8 R. E. Arvidson,9 J. W. Rice Jr.,10 E. Tre´guier,11 C. d’Uston,11 J. A. Grant,12 H. Y. McSween Jr.,13 M. P. Golombek,7 A. F. C. Haldemann,14 and P. A. de Souza Jr.15,16 Received 15 November 2007; revised 26 February 2008; accepted 7 April 2008; published 17 June 2008. [1] The strike and dip of lithologic units imaged in stereo by the Spirit rover in the Columbia Hills using three-dimensional imaging software shows that measured dips (15– 32°) for bedding on the main edifice of the Columbia Hill are steeper than local topography (8–10°). Outcrops measured on West Spur are conformable in strike with shallower dips (7–15°) than observed on Husband Hill. Dips are consistent with observed strata draping the Columbia Hills. Initial uplift was likely related either to the formation of the Gusev Crater central peak or ring or through mutual interference of overlapping crater rims. Uplift was followed by subsequent draping by a series of impact and volcaniclastic materials that experienced temporally and spatially variable aqueous infiltration, cementation, and alteration episodically during or after deposition. West Spur likely represents a spatially isolated depositional event.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing # Name Loca�On Phone # Units Rooms Notes 1 Camden Apartments 541 Merri� St
    TATE OLD SPRINGS ALEXANDRIA WRENN HICKORY LEBANON GRACE NOONKESTER GALAX CHARLES PARK 15 MARION MAIN BOEING HENRI × ROBIN CRESCENT BRAY WOODBRIAR HOWARD WELLINGTON OLIVIA BYERLY POPLAR NELSON HILL LYNDA FOWLER POPLAR LEONARD TARHEEL MITCHELL LINDSAY DUDLEY 8 TYRIE ×EMBRACE JUSTIN GRANITE LINVILLE 9 × ORCHARD PINE TERRACE ×7 TERRI SYDNOR HICKS MERITA NORTH WOODRUFF HAY CAROLINA HAY HUNTER LONE RANGER STRICKLAND FARM FRANK PINE RIVERSIDE TAYLOR BROWN GRASSY KNOLL VIRGINIA WEST 13 MAYBERRY MALL × ANDY GRIFFITH GALLOWAY BURTON PIPERS GAP CARRIAGE RUN BARBARA ELM GRANITE QUARRY FREDERICK OLD E PINE BOOKER WILLOW GRAVELY ARCH TESH SHALLOWBROOK TWILIGHT MERRITT GRANNYS GORDON 6 5 MAPLE × BOTTOM LUTHER RIDGE LUTHER JUNCTION × KNOB DOWNING EFLAND ALLEN 1 HINES EAST 1 WEST END × × MILLER CITY VIEW HIDDEN HILL RURITAN NATIONS EAST SIDE SOUTH INDEPENDENCE SPAUGH KINGSWOOD TRANQUIL MAY CITY HALL BEASLEY VIRGINIA VIRGINIA 7 OAK × MARKET MOORE COMBS ×14 GILMER PEACEHAVEN LOVILL PINE 7 MUSE BEASLEY × WILLOW EVANS MCCARGO OLD TOAST CIRCLE TOAST EFFIE FRANKLIN GRAVES CHERRY CUBS WINDCHIME BLUEMONT MAPLE GALYEAN GLENDALE CRESTVIEW BACON COLLEGE GRANITE CRITZ LINWOOD 11 × WILSON CALVARY CHURCH HERRING ROBERTS SPRING KORNER ROSEWOOD SPLENDOR MOUNT AIRY PRICE PATTERSON RENFRO FRANKLIN HAMBURG LOCKLEAR DERBY HADLEY WILSON LONG 7 4 WALNUT × WILLIAM PENN WESTOVER × DURHAM BANK LONDON MCCORMICK BROAD LOVILL WAGONER WELCH MANTLE £52 HALE ROY AYERS ¤ BLUEMONT CREED LIT BIT LIT ANGEL BARBER ESTER JESSUP WORTH ANDREWS BLUFF MARSHALL BELAIR FACTORY DEPOT HAYMORE CAIRO
    [Show full text]
  • March 2020 Violation Decision Details
    Business Address Business County Complaint Violation Number Date Violation Occurred Violation Status Subject Date Comments Acknowledgement Received Date Commission/ALJ Name Account: Account Name: 7-ELEVEN, INC. (A TEXAS CORPORATION) (5 records) Business ID: 0263564 (3 records) Business DBA: 7-ELEVEN #36910-H (3 records) 101 Woodside Ave, , Essexville, MI 48732-1109 BAY CV-504407 - Decision Issued VIOL 4/16/2019 NSF ($622.25) NSF ACH PD IN FULL 5/15/19 - - 101 Woodside Ave, , Essexville, MI 48732-1109 BAY CV-504407 - Decision Issued VIOL 4/16/2019 NSF ($622.25) ***NSF ACH paid in full - - 05/15/2019*** 101 Woodside Ave, , Essexville, MI 48732-1109 BAY CV-504407 - Decision Issued DEC 2/4/2020 The Commissioner Orders the one charge, cited - - in Complaint CV-504407, be DISMISSED, with prejudice. Business ID: 232700 (2 records) Business DBA: 7-ELEVEN #36893-H (2 records) 1955 N Center Rd, , Saginaw, MI 48638-5580 SAGINAW CV-504392 - Decision Issued VIOL 4/16/2019 NSF ($100.00)*** NSF ACH paid in full - - 05/15/2019*** 1955 N Center Rd, , Saginaw, MI 48638-5580 SAGINAW CV-504392 - Decision Issued DEC 2/4/2020 The Commissioner Orders the one charge, cited - - in Complaint CV-504392, be DISMISSED, with prejudice. Account: Account Name: 7-ELEVEN, INC. (A TEXAS CORPORATION) & ARYAN, INC. (2 records) Business ID: 215017 (2 records) Business DBA: 7-ELEVEN #34156-B (2 records) 33920 Van Born Rd, , Wayne, MI 48184-2473 WAYNE CV-504433 4/17/2019 Decision Issued VIOL 4/17/2019 NSF ($260.00) ***NSF ACH PAID IN FULL - - 05/10/2019*** 33920 Van Born Rd, , Wayne, MI 48184-2473 WAYNE CV-504433 4/17/2019 Decision Issued DEC 9/25/2019 The Commissioner Orders Complaint CV- - - 504433 DISMISSED with prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • 78155 Feldspathic Granulitic Impactite 401.1 Grams
    78155 Feldspathic Granulitic Impactite 401.1 grams Figure 1: Tray full of pieces of 78155. Largest piece is about 7 cm. Small pieces and cube are 1 cm. NASA S73-15407 Station 8, on slope of Sculptured Hills Petrography CDR Boy, almost pure white and very friable. Oh, boy, Bickel (1977) described 78155 as a holocrystalline, is it! Pure white. Right out of a small pit crater on the side weakly-coherent, polymict breccia that has been of this crater I just walked in, Houston. And it’s pure metamorphosed at a high temperature. Warner et al. white, very friable. I got one big piece and several small (1977) group it with other rocks from the early lunar in 567. crust as “feldpathic granulitic impactites”. Lindstrom LMP Bob, the walls of these craters, the big ones that are, say, 15 meters in diameter, tend to be a little bit and Lindstrom (1986) have also discussed the polymict lighter albedo than ones down in the mantled area. nature of 78155. Hudgins et al. (2008) have recently described, analyzed and dated 78155. Introduction Investigators find that about 65% of 78155 is Sample 78155 is a friable white cataclasite that was granoblasic matrix (figure 2) with another 20% found in a small “pit crater” in the wall of a 15-meter “crushed material”. Small clasts of polygonal crater at station 8, Apollo 17 (Muehlberger et al. 1973, anorthosite have been reported (see Meyer 1994). The Wolfe et al. 1981). The sample itself may have been overall mineralogical mode is ~75% plagioclase (An95) the projectile that made the small “pit crater” (Meyer and ~25% mafic silicates (mostly pigeonite 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Child Care Homes and Centers Bureau of Community and Health Systems Provider Directory
    Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Child Care Homes and Centers Bureau of Community and Health Systems Provider Directory PROVIDER NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE COUNTY 100 Acre Wood Daycare Center 1340 Onondaga Rd. Holt MI 48842 Ingham 123 Grow With Me 451 Helen St Brooklyn MI 49230 Jackson 1st Advantage Learning Center 26555 John R Road Madison Heights MI 48071 Oakland 2 Day's Child Learning Center 15075 Meyers Detroit MI 48227 Wayne 2 Sweets Angels Family Daycare 9701 Everts Street Detroit MI 48224 Wayne 21st Century - Milwood Magnet 2916 Konkle Kalamazoo MI 49001 Kalamazoo 21st Century/KCIS - Hillside Middle School 1941 Alamo Ave. Kalamazoo MI 49006 Kalamazoo 21st Century/KCIS - Linden Grove Middle School 4241 Arboretum Pkwy. Kalamazoo MI 49006 Kalamazoo 21st Century/KCIS - Maple Street Magnet 922 W. Maple St. Kalamazoo MI 49008 Kalamazoo 2BKids Creative Station 622 Bates St Grand Rapids MI 49503 Kent 3 C's & ABC 47080 Exeter Ct Shelby Twp MI 48315 Macomb 3 Musketeers Daycare 1388 Lancaster Ave NW Grand Rapids MI 49504 Kent 4 K Learning Center 13220 Greenfield Detroit MI 48227 Wayne 40 Acre Wood Daycare 5595 Truckey Rd Alpena MI 49707 Alpena A & J's Child Care 512 W Martin St Gladwin MI 48624 Gladwin A and W Day Care Center 6565 Greenfield Detroit MI 48228 Wayne A Brighter Beginning 16101 Schoolcraft Detroit MI 48227 Wayne A Child's World Learning Center 1828 E Michigan Ave Ypsilanti MI 48198 Washtenaw A G B U Alex & Marie Manoogian School 22001 Northwestern Southfield MI 48075 Oakland A Growing Place Inc 40700 Ten Mile Road Novi MI 48375 Oakland A Happy Place Childcare 3713 Lawndale Drive Midland MI 48642 Midland A Home Away From Home Child Care 3875 Bacon Ave Berkley MI 48072 Oakland A Joyful Noise Child Development Center LLC 2515 Ashman St.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Document
    WORKSHOP DOCUMENT For the pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Workshop VERSION 11/01/2012 Prepared by N2K Group, namely Jan Dušek, Lenka Vokasová, Anja Finne, Helena Carská, Milan Janák, Pavel Marhoul & Kerstin Sundseth; (with further input and editing by Lawrence Jones-Walters and Mark Snethlage, ECNC and Lubos halada, ILE SAS). PILOT BOREAL NATURA 2000 SEMINAR Content Executive summary............................................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction and general information..........................................................................................................5 1.1 Objectives..................................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Introduction to the biogeographical process.......................................................................................5 1.3 Boreal biogeographical region...............................................................................................................8 1.4 Selection of habitat types and species ..............................................................................................12 2. Grasslands ....................................................................................................................................................14 Habitat type 6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates (Festuco-Brometalia) (* important orchid sites) ......................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Timing of Fluvial Activity at Eberswalde Crater, Mars
    Icarus 220 (2012) 530–551 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The origin and timing of fluvial activity at Eberswalde crater, Mars ⇑ N. Mangold a, , E.S. Kite b, M.G. Kleinhans c, H. Newsom d, V. Ansan a, E. Hauber e, E. Kraal f, C. Quantin g, K. Tanaka h a Laboratoire Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, LPGN/CNRS, Université Nantes, 2, rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France b Division of Geological and Planetary Science, Caltech MC 150-21, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA c Faculty of Geosciences, Universiteit Utrecht, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands d Institute of Meteoritics, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA e Institut für Planetenforschung/Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany f Department of Physical Sciences, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, PA 19530, USA g Laboratoire Géologie de Lyon, La Doua, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne, France h Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Dr. Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA article info abstract Article history: The fan deposit in Eberswalde crater has been interpreted as strong evidence for sustained liquid water on Received 19 September 2011 early Mars with a paleolake formed during the Noachian period (>3.7 Gy). This location became a key region Revised 2 May 2012 for understanding the Mars paleo-environment. Eberswalde crater is located 50 km north of the rim of the Accepted 22 May 2012 150 km diameter crater Holden.
    [Show full text]