CULTURAL IMPACT REPORT Dry Creek Replacement Cleanfill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CULTURAL IMPACT REPORT Dry Creek Replacement Cleanfill CULTURAL IMPACT REPO R T Dry Creek replacement cleanfill Judgeford IN ASSOCIATION WITH WELLINGTON TENTHS TRUST & PORT NICHOLSON BLOCK SETTLEMENT TRUST CULTURAL IMPACT REPORT Dry Creek replacement cleanfill TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW & TECHNICAL DETAIL .................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CULTURAL IMPACT REPORT ...........................................................5 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ......................................................................................................................6 OTHER CULTURAL ISSUES ............................................................................................................................7 TRADITIONAL MAORI HISTORY OF THE AREA ..............................................................................7 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 10 BATTLE OF BOULCOTT FARM .................................................................................................................... 15 TANGATA WHENUA OF WELLINGTON TODAY ............................................................................. 16 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 19 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................................................................................ 19 APPENDIX I ................................................................................................................................................ 20 APPENDIX II – TRACKS AND PLACES IN HUTT VALLEY AND PORIRUA ............................... 21 APPENDIX III – SITE LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................... 22 © Raukura Consultants 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW & TECHNICAL DETAIL The Project 1. Winstone Aggregates (Winstones) propose to establish and operate a cleanfill on rural land adjacent to State Highway 58 (SH58) approximately 4 kms to the northwest of Winstone’s existing Dry Creek Cleanfill on State Highway 2 (SH2). 2. The proposed cleanfill will be known as the Dry Creek Replacement Cleanfill (DCR). The DCR site is privately owned and currently run as a dry stock farming operation. The site is located within the jurisdiction of the Greater Wellington Regional Council, the Porirua City Council and Hutt City Council. The land will be leased to Winstones as required. 3. The DCR will be located in the lower half of a farm gully which effectively ensures that the upper half of regenerating and mature native vegetation can remain intact and can be subject to potential future protection through stock exclusion. 4. The cleanfill will have an extensive drainage system centred on the main stream in the gully all leading to sediment retention ponds which are designed to retain sediments from discharging into the natural streams. The project will have four such ponds with three in gullies around the site. Fill slopes will be stabilised and planted as they are built up with fill. 5. The site will be accessed through a controlled entrance from SH 58 with a main access road across the top of the fill site. The Environment 6. The DCR site is within the Pauatahanui catchment which has an overall area of around 43.4 km2 and the mainstream length is 9.6 km. The upper catchment has pockets of bush and shrubland with the middle and lower catchment largely in exotic shelter belts and pasture. 7. There is a tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream that runs through the site and joins the upper reaches of the main stream after passing through a culvert under SH58. 8. The Pauatahanui stream and its tributaries like stream in the region have populations of native fish including banded kokopu, eels and bullies. There is some limitation on fish access along the valley, with some perched culverts in the Pauatahanui Stream. 3 That would mean the ‘climbers’ of the native fish species are favoured in the upper catchment with perhaps including koaro (one of the whitebait species and perhaps the best climber able to climb near vertical walls). 9. The project will not involve clearing indigenous forest or scrublands with most of the area being pasture with some 0.7 ha of manuka shrubland to be cleared. Above the site the Belmont Regional Park which features regenerating native forest is used extensively around the Dry Creek area in the Hutt valley. Ref: ATL 1/2-151767-F Aerial view of the Haywards Hill Road in 1939. The cleanfill site is in the background of this photo which shows Dry Creek 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CULTURAL IMPACT REPORT 10. This report will cover the area around the proposed cleanfill site in the Pauatahanui Stream catchment. The area is largely pasture in a gully which has a tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream draining it. Water flows in the area are intermittent with few permanent streams. The cleanfill will fill the unnamed stream gully which will have been culverted to provide essential drainage of the upper catchment through the site. There will be four sediment retention ponds. Erosion control is also important for a cleanfill operation including stabilisation of fill faces and drainage control. The cleanfill operation is large and will need to be landscaped to manage visual impacts. 11. The cultural impact issues around this project will largely focus on potential environmental impacts. The Māori cultural significance of this area relate to events that occurred in the Hutt Valley and Pauatahanui in the early colonial period. Early Māori travelled through the area to get to hunting grounds or while transiting to battles. In the mid 19th century the area became notorious with Māori warriors coming through this area to attack the colonists in the Hutt valley and then escape back through the valley eventually to the Pā at Battle Hill. There were no Pā, kainga or urupa in the immediate area of the cleanfill. The nearest Pā were at Pauatahanui and in the Hutt Valley at Motutawa (Avalon Park). 12. The Māori cultural issues related to this area come from what was happening in the Hutt Valley and at Pauatahanui and the movement of people from one area to another. 13. In the period of colonisation this was an area affected by conflicts both between various iwi as well as between the newly arriving colonists and visiting iwi groups. The land was a major route between the Porirua Harbour and the Hutt Valley. It is still that today. However it was not really a place where people resided, gardened or stayed for any time. There were no Pā sites or Māori burial grounds. The tracks through the site were the most important feature from Māori times. The hills above Belmont were known as Pareraho Hills. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 14. The area for the cleanfill is drained by the Pauatahanui Stream which itself drains into the Pauatahanui Inlet, an arm of the sea. The inlet is one with high ecological values with the estuarine area being home to many juvenile stages of both freshwater species of fish along with many marine species. Pauatahanui Inlet is the largest in Porirua and the most extensive relatively unmodified estuarine area in the southern part of the North Island. 15. The Pauatahanui Inlet is home to waterfowl, both local and migratory waders, with occasionally a rare visitor such as the bar-tailed godwit. The inlet is the only large area of salt-marsh and seagrass in the Wellington region. The quality of the water it receives from the Pauatahanui stream catchment is important. 16. The site is adjacent to part of the Belmont Regional Park being the Dry Creek area. This is largely regeneration forest which has been taken out of farming operations. There are camping areas in Dry Creek however they are remote from the proposed cleanfill site. There should be minimal environmental impacts on the Regional Park. 17. The indigenous fisheries that move up the Pauatahunui stream are likely to be quite limited on the site with access restricted by perched culverts, where a pipe which protrudes at the downstream end making it difficult for fish passage. Fish would probably include banded kokopu, eel, and koaro. 18. The important aspect of the design of this facility is the site drainage system. The object of the system is to ensure that silts are trapped on site and settled out of the drainage water. 19. Great care must be taken in accepting hard fill into the cleanfill site. This means no contaminated material is to be brought onto the site. All contaminated fill should be taken to the main city council landfills which are sealed from discharge to the environment. The cleanfill will be unsealed. 20. Roading through the site will need to be managed for dust control as will the whole site particularly given the proximity of SH 58. 6 OTHER CULTURAL ISSUES 21. There are no particular cultural impacts from the proposed clean fill aside from the environmental issues. There are no cultural sites within the project area aside from the traditional Māori tracks which ran through the area. 22. The cultural issues are associated with activities that took place in the vicinity in the Hutt Valley and at Pauatahanui particularly during the volatile period from 1819 to 1850. TRADITIONAL MAORI HI STORY OF THE AREA 23. This is an area where great conflict occurred early in colonial history with conflicts over the New Zealand Company’s sale of rural acres to settlers and the displaced people
Recommended publications
  • Review Year In
    Our Year in Review Annual Review Year to June 2020 Our vision That people in our communities who need palliative care have access to compassionate and quality care, when and where they need it. Our approach Taking a whole person approach, we will provide and promote high quality specialist palliative care, grief support, education and care planning services. Working alongside our health partners, we aim to make a difference in the communities we serve. Our values Respect Compassion Dignity Hospitality Stewardship Ngā kaupapa o Meri Potter Hospice Mana Aroha Rangatiratanga Manaakitanga Kaitiakitanga Mary Potter Hospice relies on the generous donation of time and knowledge by many amazing people. To the following people we offer our sincere appreciation for the many hours you freely commit to the Hospice. Your generosity of spirit Contents enables the Hospice to carry on. Our vision Patron Chair’s message 2 Dame Kerry Prendergast From the Chief Executive 3 Mary Potter Hospice Board Acknowledging and strengthening our partnership with Māori 4 Chair: Andrea McCance Our service: more patients, more services, more care 5 Deputy Chair and Chair of the Audit Finance and Investment Response to Covid-19 6 Committee: Malcolm Bruce Hospice@Home 6 Board members: Stephanie Dyhrberg, Sumati Govind, Sister Margaret Last Days of Life Programme 6 Lancaster, Martin Lenart, Dr Grant Pidgeon, Tui Te Hau, Dr David Werry Inpatient Unit Model of Care Review 6 Medical team 7 Te Pou Tautoko: Māori support Volunteer Advisory Group Quality 7 and advisory group This group advises the Hospice on our volunteer Day Services 8 Te Pou Tautoko provides advice and supports the services and strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Te Rangihaeata
    PART IV MR59 103 PART IV MR01 Cootia Pipi Kutia the portrait of cootia at Pitt Rivers Keats’s poem: “Rauparaha stayed on board to dinner, Museum is the first in the Coates sketchbook, and her with his wife, a tall Meg Merrilies-like woman, who husband, Te Rauparaha, is the second. Cootia is more had a bushy head of hair, frizzled out to the height of six commonly known as Kutia or Pipi Kutia. inches all round, and a masculine voice and appetite. Pipi Kutia was wife of Te Rauparaha (MR02), She is the daughter of his last wife by a former husband.”3 acknowledged fighting chief of Ngāti Toa, and of the Tainui–Taranaki alliance. Her mother, Te The New Zealand Company surveyor John Barnicoat Akau, was high-born of the Te Arawa tribe (of the described members of Te Rauparaha’s party in Nelson in Rotorua district of the central North Island of New March 1843: “He has brought three of his wives with him ... Zealand), and her father, Hapekituarangi, was a senior the second ... is a tall stout woman of handsome features hereditary chief of Ngāti Raukawa of Maungatautari if not too masculine ...”4 And the Australian artist (the present-day Cambridge district). Hapekituarangi G. F. Angas, who toured New Zealand in mid to late 1844, was a distant kinsman of Te Rauparaha. On his was also impressed, describing Kutia: deathbed, Hape’s mantle of seniority bypassed his “Rauparaha’s wife is an exceedingly stout woman, and own sons and fell to Te Rauparaha, and in accordance wears her hair, which is very stiff and wiry, combed up with custom, Te Rauparaha married Hape’s widow, into an erect mass upon her head, about a foot in height, Te Akau.1 In c.
    [Show full text]
  • MAI a WAIWIRI KI WAITOHU: How Mātauranga Māori Enhances Iwi and Hapū Well Being and Ecological Integrity
    Manaaki Taha Moana: Enhancing Coastal Ecosystems for Iwi and Hapū Report No. 18 November 2015 MAI A WAIWIRI KI WAITOHU: How Mātauranga Māori Enhances Iwi and Hapū Well Being and Ecological Integrity MAI A WAIWIRI KI WAITOHU: How Mātauranga Māori Enhances Iwi and Hapū Well Being and Ecological Integrity Dr Huhana Smith [With support from Horowhenua MTM team- Moira Poutama and Aroha Spinks.] ISBN 978-0-9876639-7-9 ISSN 2230-3332 (Print) ISSN 2230-3340 (Online) Published by the Manaaki Taha Moana (MTM) Research Team Funded by the Ministry for Science and Innovation Contract MAUX0907 Main Contract Holder: Massey University www.mtm.ac.nz Approved for release Reviewed by: by: Cultural Advisor MTM Science Leader Mr Lindsay Poutama Professor Murray Patterson Issue Date: November 2015 RECOMMENDED CITATION: Smith, H., 2015, MAI A WAIWIRI KI WAITOHU: How Mātauranga Māori Enhances Iwi and Hapū Well Being and Ecological Integrity, Manaaki Taha Moana Research Project, Massey University: Palmerston North/Taiao Raukawa Environmental Resource Unit: Ōtaki. 43 pages © Copyright: Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, this publication must not be reproduced in whole or in part without the written permission of the Copyright Holder, who, unless other authorship is cited in the text or acknowledgements, is the commissioner of the report. MIHIMIHI1 Tuia i runga, tuia i raro, tuia i waho, tuia i roto, tuia te here tangata, ka rongo te pō, ka rongo te ao. Ka tuku te ia o whakaaro kia rere makuru roimata atu ki te kāhui ngū kua hoki atu ki te waro huanga roa o te wairua, rātou kei tua o te ārai, takoto, okioki, e moe.
    [Show full text]
  • Porirua – Our Place, Our Future, Our Challenge Let's Kōrero
    COPYRIGHT © You are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to Porirua City Council. Published March 2021. Porirua City Council 16 Cobham Court PO Box 50218 Porirua 5240 This document is available on our website poriruacity.govt.nz Porirua – our place, our future, our challenge Let’s kōrero Consultation Document for the proposed Long-term Plan 2021-51 Message from Ngāti Toa Rangatira E te iwi e noho nei i te riu o Porirua, tēnā koutou katoa The development of the city's Long-term Plan 2021-2051 will bring changes to our city that we will be proud of. Between now and 2051 we will see Porirua transform into a vibrant and exciting place to be for residents and people who choose to work here. We are blessed with hills, waterways, Te Mana o Kupe bushwalks and two magnificent harbours, Porirua and Pāuatahanui, as well as rich histories all anchored by Te Matahourua, the anchor left here by Kupe. As a challenge to all of us – we must look after our environment and look after each other, especially our tamariki and rangatahi. Nou te rourou, naku te rourou ka ora ai te Iwi With your contribution, and my contribution the people will thrive Taku Parai Chairman, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Toa Rangatira 2 Consultation Document for the proposed LTP 2021-51 Contents Mai i tō Koutou Koromatua 4 From your Mayor Executive summary 8 Rates 10 The challenges for our city 11 Your views 16 Investment in the 3 waters – drinking water, wastewater 17 & stormwater 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 207 Wai 785
    In the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 207 Wai 785 Under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 In the Matter of the Northern South Island Inquiry (Wai 785) And In the Matter of a claim to the Waitangi Tribunal by Akuhata Wineera, Pirihira Hammond, Ariana Rene, Ruta Rene, Matuaiwi Solomon, Ramari Wineera, Hautonga te Hiko Love, Wikitoria Whatu, Ringi Horomona, Harata Solomon, Rangi Wereta, Tiratu Williams, Ruihi Horomona and Manu Katene for and on behalf of themselves and all descendants of the iwi and hapu of Ngati Toa Rangatira BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF TE WAARI CARKEEK Dated 9 June 2003 89 The Terrace PO Box 10246 DX SP26517 Wellington Telephone (04) 472 7877 Facsimile (04) 472 2291 Solicitor Acting: D A Edmunds Counsel: K Bellingham/K E Mitchell/B E Ross 031600261 KEM BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF TE WAARI CARKEEK Introduction 1 My name is Te Waari Carkeek, and I am known as Te Waari. I was born at Otaki on 29 October 1960, I was brought up there. My father is Rikihana Te Rei Carkeek and my mother is Hemaima Te Hiwi Carkeek. I am the second youngest of their fourteen children. I am of Ngati Toa and Ngati Raukawa descent, among others. 2 I reside in Otaki today. Although I am not a resident in Te Tau Ihu I have always been aware that our family had roots there through our Maori ancestry. 3 I am self-employed and contract my administrative and teaching skills for our iwi developments. I presently have a working relationship with Te Runanga o Raukawa Inc and the Raukawa Marae Information and Support Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Te-Ariki-Wi-Neera.Pdf
    In the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 207 Wai 785 Under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 In the Matter of the Northern South Island Inquiry (Wai 785) And In the Matter of a claim to the Waitangi Tribunal by Akuhata Wineera, Pirihira Hammond, Ariana Rene, Ruta Rene, Matuaiwi Solomon, Ramari Wineera, Hautonga te Hiko Love, Wikitoria Whatu, Ringi Horomona, Harata Solomon, Rangi Wereta, Tiratu Williams, Ruihi Horomona and Manu Katene for and on behalf of themselves and all descendants of the iwi and hapu of Ngati Toa Rangatira BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF TE ARIKI KAWHE WI NEERA Dated 9 June 2003 89 The Terrace PO Box 10246 DX SP26517 Wellington Telephone (04) 472 7877 Facsimile (04) 472 2291 Solicitor Acting: D A Edmunds Counsel: K Bellingham/K E Mitchell/B E Ross 031600234 KB BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF TE ARIKI KAWHE WI NEERA Introduction 1 My name is Te Ariki Kawhe Wi Neera. I was born in Wellington on 12 September 1960 and I live in Karehana Bay, Porirua. 2 My parents are Ariki Paraaone Toaaingaa Wi Neera of Ngati Toa Rangatira and Aneta Nihipora Hiraina Pou of Nga Puhi me Ngati Kahungunu/Scottish and Welsh ancestry. I whakapapa predominantly to Ngati Toa Rangatira. 3 I am a direct descendant of Te Rauparaha. I am going to give evidence today relating to his illegal kidnapping and detention by the Crown, and the huge effect this had on Ngati Toa Rangatira as an iwi. 4 My Ngati Toa Rangatira whakapapa is as follows: Toa Rangatira Marangaiparoa Kimihia Te Maunu Werawera Pikauterangi Te Rauparaha Toitoi Karoraina Tutari Te Peehi Kupe Ria Te Uira Te Hiko o Te Rangi Wi Neera Te Kanae Matenga Te Hiko Wiremu Pere Wi Neera Paraaone Te Hiko Te Ariki Wi Neera Ramari Pirihira Te Hiko Ariki Paraaone Wi Neera Ariki Paraaone Wi Neera Te Ariki Kawhe Wi Neera Te Ariki Kawhe Wi Neera 2 031600234 KB Te Rauparaha 5 Our tupuna Te Rauparaha was probably one of the most feared and hated Maori by Europeans throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Manager, Environmental Regulation on a Notified Resource Consent Application
    Report to the Manager, Environmental Regulation on a notified resource consent application Summary of application Activity: Earthworks, stream piping, stream reclamation and soil disturbance associated with the harvesting of 44.3 ha of pine forest. File Reference: WGN110347 Applicant: Pauatahanui Forest 346 Paremata Haywards Road Judgeford Porirua 5381 Attention: Wendy and Graham Bugden Address for service Forest Owner Marketing Service PO Box 96 Fielding 4740 Attention: Paul van der Voort Consents sought: [31252] Discretionary Activity Discharge permit to discharge stormwater contaminated with sediment, originating from areas of bulk earthworks exceeding 0.3 hectares, into water, and onto land where it may enter water, from sediment control and treatment measures; [31254] Discretionary Activity Water permit to dam and divert the full flow of a tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream through a pipe [31048] Non complying Activity Land use consent to place a pipe and associated disturbance and deposition in the beds of a tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream in association with the logging of pine forest [31255] Discretionary Activity Land use consent for disturbance of and deposition on the beds of a tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream in association with the cable hauling logs. [31253] Discretionary Activity Land use consent to disturb soil in association with constructing roading and tracking with an upslope batter greater than 2 metres extending for a length greater than 200 metres. [31345[ Discretionary Activity Land use consent to reclaim a ten metre section of stream bed of an unnamed tributary of the Pauatahanui Stream. Location: 346a Paremata Haywards Road, Judgeford, Porirua Map Reference: Between approximate map references NZTM 1763145.5445413, 1763288.5445043, 1763889.5444836, 1763958.5445265 and 1763553.5445724 Legal Description: Lot 2 DP 89065 Recommendation: I recommend that the above consent be granted, subject to conditions, for the reasons outlined in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • PAREMATA SCHOOL NEWSLETTER WEDNESDAY 141414 Ththth SEPTEMBER 2016 WEEK 888 ––– TERM 3
    PAREMATA SCHOOL NEWSLETTER WEDNESDAY 141414 ththth SEPTEMBER 2016 WEEK 888 ––– TERM 3 IMPORTANT DATES Tonight Gala Meeting in Staffroom @ 7.30pm – all welcome Friday 16 th September Artsplash Assembly @ 11.45am – all welcome Wednesday 21 st September Netball Prize Giving @ 6pm in the school hall Thursday 22 nd September Cultural Parade, fundraiser for Kitoola School, Uganda Thursday 22 nd September School Assembly @ 9.30am (after Cultural Parade) Friday 23 rd September Mulch Day from 9.00am (see insert below) Friday 23 rd September End of Term 3 @ 3.00pm Monday 10 th October Term 4 commences Monday 10 th October Junior Swimming Programme commences Saturday 15 th October Paremata School Spring Gala Friday 16 th December End of Term 4 @ 12.30pm Kia ora tatou Artsplash Assembly To celebrate all the hard work in Artsplash this year we are having a special Artsplash assembly on Friday at 11.45am. Please join us if you can make it. Gastro Virus in School As many parents are aware we have an acute gastro bug going through school at present. An information sheet on how to prevent the spread of the virus is attached to the newsletter. Please can you ensure that if your child gets sick that they don't return to school until they have been well (symptom free) for 48 hours. Reminder Letters Re Activity Fee And Swimming Programme A reminder letter will be going home to the Pohutukawa and Kowhai team soon letting parents/caregivers know how much is owing on the activity fees. These fees will need to be paid before your child can attend the swimming programme next term.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaikoura: Historical Background
    Kaikoura: Historical Background Jim McAloon Lecturer, Human Sciences Division, Lincoln University. [email protected] David G Simmons Reader in Tourism, Human Sciences Division, Lincoln University. [email protected] John R Fairweather Senior Research Officer in the Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University. [email protected] September 1998 ISSN 1174-670X Tourism Research and Education Centre (TREC) Report No. 1 Contents LIST OF FIGURES iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv SUMMARY v CHAPTER 1 KAIKOURA – HISTORICAL OVERVIEW.............................................. 1 1.1 Geography.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Māori Settlement................................................................................ 1 1.3 Crown Purchases................................................................................ 4 1.4 Pastoralism......................................................................................... 6 1.5 Small Farming.................................................................................... 7 1.6 Conclusion: An Enduring Pattern ...................................................... 9 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 13 ii List of Figures Figure No. Page No. 1. Areas of historical and Māori significance in the Kaikoura district..............2 iii Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided by the Foundation for Research,
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Boast Part 4
    In the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 207 Wai 785 Under The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 In the Matter of The Te Tau Ihu Inquiry (Wai 785) And In the Matter of The claim to the Waitangi Tribunal by Akuhata Wineera, Pirihira Hammond, Ariana Rene, Ruta Rene, Matuaiwi Solomon, Ramari Wineera, Hautonga te Hiko Love, Wikitoria Whatu, Ringi Horomona, Harata Solomon, Rangi Wereta, Tiratu Williams, Ruihi Horomona and Manu Katene for and on behalf of themselves and all descendants of the iwi and hapu of Ngati Toa Rangatira BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF RICHARD PETER BOAST Part Four: Land Transactions and the Native Land Court Dated 11 June 2003 89 The Terrace PO Box 10246 DX SP26517 Wellington Telephone (04) 472 7877 Facsimile (04) 472 2291 Solicitor Acting: D A Edmunds Counsel: K Bellingham/K E Mitchell/B E Ross 031610198 KB BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF RICHARD PETER BOAST 1 The Nelson Grant and Ngati Toa 1.1 Commissioner Spain’s investigation and report: As noted earlier, Commissioner Spain was not enquiring into the validity and fairness of the 1839 deeds as such. Referring to the New Zealand Company’s November 1840 agreement he noted that his investigation of the claim “has of course materially been narrowed by the arrangement with Her Majesty’s government”. This agreement “restricted the selection of land by its Agent in the Colony to certain quantities of land in certain localities”. Spain was investigating whether the Company was entitled to receive a Crown grant to the lands it had surveyed in the Nelson area. He concluded that it was, for four reasons: 1 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Allocation in Te Awarua-O- Porirua Whaitua
    Title: Hydrology and water allocation in Te Awarua-o- Porirua Whaitua Purpose: To provide an overview of the hydrological systems and current water allocation within Te Awarua-o-Porirua Whaitua. Author: Environmental Science Department, GWRC Date: September 2015 Contact Te Awarua-o-Porirua Whaitua Committee PO Box 11646, Wellington 6142 [email protected] T 0800 496 734 F 04 385 6960 Hydrology and water allocation in Te Awarua-o-Porirua Whaitua Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. HYDROLOGY OF THE WHAITUA ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 HOROKIRI STREAM ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 PORIRUA STREAM ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1 Kenepuru Stream ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.2 Mitchell Stream ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 Belmont Stream .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sir George Grey and the British Southern Hemisphere
    TREATY RESEARCH SERIES TREATY OF WAITANGI RESEARCH UNIT ‘A Terrible and Fatal Man’: Sir George Grey and the British Southern Hemisphere Regna non merito accidunt, sed sorte variantur States do not come about by merit, but vary according to chance Cyprian of Carthage Bernard Cadogan Copyright © Bernard Cadogan This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without the permission of the publishers. 1 Introduction We are proud to present our first e-book venture in this series. Bernard Cadogan holds degrees in Education and History from the University of Otago and a D. Phil from Oxford University, where he is a member of Keble College. He is also a member of Peterhouse, Cambridge University, and held a post-doctoral fellowship at the Stout Research Centre at Victoria University of Wellington in 2011. Bernard has worked as a political advisor and consultant for both government and opposition in New Zealand, and in this context his roles have included (in 2011) assisting Hon. Bill English establish New Zealand’s Constitutional Review along the lines of a Treaty of Waitangi dialogue. He worked as a consultant for the New Zealand Treasury between 2011 and 2013, producing (inter alia) a peer-reviewed published paper on welfare policy for the long range fiscal forecast. Bernard is am currently a consultant for Waikato Maori interests from his home in Oxford, UK, where he live s with his wife Jacqueline Richold Johnson and their two (soon three) children.
    [Show full text]