DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Issues Report Notice of Requirement and Resource

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Issues Report Notice of Requirement and Resource Key Issues Report Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent applications for the Transmission Gully Project New Zealand Transport Authority, Porirua City Council, and Transpower NZ Limited Greater Wellington Regional Council Commissioned by the Environmental Protection Authority under Section 149G(3) of the Resource Management Act 6 September 2011 Report Author Date Tracey Grant Team Leader Contributor Date Richard Percy Senior Resource Advisor Peer Reviewer Date Alistair Cross Manager, Environment Regulation Contents 1. Purpose 1 2. Terms 1 3. Scope 1 4. Relevant plan provisions 2 5. Summary of Consents 15 6. Activity status of all proposed activities 17 7. Confirmation of the status and weighting of any relevant regional policy statement, and or relevant plan 17 8. Permitted baseline 18 9. Any other key issues 21 Appendices Appendix A - Plan Change – Draft Decision wording of Policies Appendix B – National Environmental Standards Appendix C - Permitted activities – Wellington Regional Council Plans Appendix D – Active resource consents Appendix E – Approximate location of resource consents Appendix F - Pending resource consents 1 PURPOSE 1.1 To prepare a report pursuant to section 149G(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) to contextualise the Transmission Gully proposal (TGP) within GW‘s planning framework and instruments and to identify any key issues. 2 TERMS Act Resource Management Act 1991 EPA Environmental Protection Authority GW Greater Wellington Regional Council KCDC Kapiti Coast District Council NES-AQ National Environmental Standards for Air Quality NES-DW National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water NOR Notices of Requirement NPSET National Policy Statement on Electricity Transmission NPSFM National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management NPSREG National Policy Statement for Renewable Electricity Generation NZCPS New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 NZTA New Zealand Transport Authority PCC Porirua City Council Plan Change NZTA Plan Change on Regional Freshwater Plan lodged 6 September 2011 pRPS Proposed Regional Policy Statement for the Wellington Region RAMP Regional Air Quality Management Plan for the Wellington Region RFP Regional Freshwater Plan for the Wellington Region RPS Regional Policy Statement for the Wellington Region RSP Regional Soil Plan for the Wellington Region TGP Transmission Gully Proposal UHCC Upper Hutt City Council WCC Wellington City Council 3 SCOPE 3.1 This report identifies the key issues that arise in relation to the proposal, as they relate to the land and matters within GW‘s jurisdiction, including (a) any relevant provisions of a national policy statement, a New Zealand coastal policy statement, a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement, and a plan or proposed plan; and (b) a statement on whether all required resource consents in relation to the proposal to which the matter relates have been applied for; and (c) if applicable, the activity status of all proposed activities in relation to the matter. (d) confirmation of the status, and weighting if proposed, of any relevant regional policy statement, and or relevant plan; and (e) detail of the permitted baseline and existing environment for the resource consents applied for within GW including: WGN_DOCS-#960551-v1 PAGE 1 OF 24 The permitted baseline, and details of any resource consents held in the area that form the existing environment within GW‘s jurisdiction. Comment on whether the proposed consents applied for within GW jurisdiction will affect any relevant existing consent holder‘s ability to implement their existing consents should the proposed consents be granted. Any other matter which is relevant to the key issues associated with the applications. 3.2 This report is not in the nature of a submission on the proposal, and does not advocate for a particular outcome. 3.3 While this report may comment on draft conditions it is not within the scope of this report to provide a detailed assessment of the proposed/draft conditions. 3.4 This report does not cover any Key Issues with regard to Transpower Transmission Line Relocation project. The applications relate solely to consents required by territorial authorities, and no regional council consents have been applied for as part of this application. 4 RELEVANT PLAN PROVISIONS 4.1 The following statutory documents and provisions are considered relevant to TGP: National Policy Statements Regional Policy Statements District Plans National Environmental Standards Others To avoid unnecessary duplication I have referred to the applicants statutory assessment, and provided further detail if considered necessary. 4.2 National Policy Statements 4.2.1 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 (NZCPS) The NZCPS came into effect on 3 December 2010. It provides policies to achieve the purpose of the Act in relation to the coastal environment. Policies in the NZCPS address the coastal marine area and the wider coastal environment. The coastal marine area is land, water and air below mean high water springs. TGP does not directly encroach into the coastal marine area, or directly discharge into the coastal marine area, however the marine environment is the ultimate receiving environment for sediment laden water from construction of the project, and stormwater runoff from road surfaces from the operation of the project (refer Section 9.2 below). I therefore concur with the applicants comments in Section 32.4.2 of the application documents that the NZCPS is a relevant consideration. PAGE 2 OF 24 WGN_DOCS-#960551-v1 The coastal environment includes the coastal marine area but its landward boundary is not clearly defined, although criteria on its extent and characteristics are identified in Policy 1 of the NZCPS. It is difficult to provide clear guidance on whether the proposal will have a direct or indirect impact on the coastal environment. NZCPS contains 7 objectives and 29 policies. A full copy of the NZCPS and relevant objectives and policies can be viewed in detail at: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/marine-and-coastal/new- zealand-coastal-policy-statement/new-zealand-coastal-policy-statement-2010/. All the objectives are considered relevant to TGP. They are summarised as follows: Safeguarding and sustaining the coastal environment (Objective 1); Preserve natural character and protecting natural features and landscapes (Objective 2); Taking account of the Treaty of Waitangi and recognising Tangata whenua as kaitiaki (Objective 3); Maintaining and enhancing public open space and recreation opportunities (Objective 4); Managing coastal hazard risks (Objective 5); Enabling people and communities to provide for their social, economic and cultural wellbeing through subdivision, use and development in the coastal environment (Objective 6); and Ensuring compliance with New Zealand‘s international obligations (Objective 7). The relevant policies of the NZCPS for this proposal are detailed in Section 32.4.2 of the application. Policies that are relevant to this proposal are: Policies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 15, 18, 21, 22 and 23. I note that Section 32.4.2 does not identify the following policies: 3, 5, 11, 15 and 18. I consider Policy 3 to be relevant, as it stresses the need to adopt a precautionary approach towards proposed activities whose effects on the coastal environment are „uncertain, unknown, or little understood, but potentially significantly adverse‟. The applicants have undertaken investigations on the Porirua Harbour, in particular the processes within the Pauatahanui Inlet, and have modelled the likely impact of the proposal on the coastal environment (Technical Reports 11, 14, and 15). Due to the size of the proposal, and the stage of detailed design, there is always an element of uncertainty, and the effects on the Harbour have the potential to be significant – particularly in extreme weather events. Policy 5 is relevant as it covers land or waters managed or held under other Acts – including any acts for conservation or protection purposes. Pauatahanui Inlet is listed in the Wellington Conservation Management Strategy 1996 which was WGN_DOCS-#960551-v1 PAGE 3 OF 24 prepared under the Conservation Act 1987. The Strategy recognises the importance of the Inlet. I consider Policy 11 is relevant. Policy 11 refers to the need to protect indigenous biological diversity in the coastal environment. The Horokiri, Ration and lower Pauatahanui Streams are recognised in Policy 4.2.10 of the RFP as having a High Degree of Natural Character. These streams drain into the Pauatahanui Inlet which has many of the characteristics listed in Policy 11. The applicants have investigated the likely impacts of TGP on the coastal environment, and the results are found in Technical Reports 10, 11 and 15. Policy 15 refers to the need to protect natural features and landscapes of the coastal environment from inappropriate development. If the proposal is considered to be within the coastal environment, it is a matter for the Board to decide whether this represents appropriate or otherwise development in the coastal environment. Policy 18 recognises the need for public open space within and adjacent to the coastal marine area. This includes ensuring that the location and treatment of public open space is compatible with the natural character, natural features and landscapes, and amenity values of the coastal environment. If it is considered that the TGP traverses the coastal environment, or is visible from the coastal environment,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Year In
    Our Year in Review Annual Review Year to June 2020 Our vision That people in our communities who need palliative care have access to compassionate and quality care, when and where they need it. Our approach Taking a whole person approach, we will provide and promote high quality specialist palliative care, grief support, education and care planning services. Working alongside our health partners, we aim to make a difference in the communities we serve. Our values Respect Compassion Dignity Hospitality Stewardship Ngā kaupapa o Meri Potter Hospice Mana Aroha Rangatiratanga Manaakitanga Kaitiakitanga Mary Potter Hospice relies on the generous donation of time and knowledge by many amazing people. To the following people we offer our sincere appreciation for the many hours you freely commit to the Hospice. Your generosity of spirit Contents enables the Hospice to carry on. Our vision Patron Chair’s message 2 Dame Kerry Prendergast From the Chief Executive 3 Mary Potter Hospice Board Acknowledging and strengthening our partnership with Māori 4 Chair: Andrea McCance Our service: more patients, more services, more care 5 Deputy Chair and Chair of the Audit Finance and Investment Response to Covid-19 6 Committee: Malcolm Bruce Hospice@Home 6 Board members: Stephanie Dyhrberg, Sumati Govind, Sister Margaret Last Days of Life Programme 6 Lancaster, Martin Lenart, Dr Grant Pidgeon, Tui Te Hau, Dr David Werry Inpatient Unit Model of Care Review 6 Medical team 7 Te Pou Tautoko: Māori support Volunteer Advisory Group Quality 7 and advisory group This group advises the Hospice on our volunteer Day Services 8 Te Pou Tautoko provides advice and supports the services and strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • International Student Directory
    International Student Directory Giving links to various community groups and support organisations in the greater Wellington Region please visit: multiculturalnz.org.nz 1 Tertiary Providers (Universities and Technical Institutes) generally have significant support services and resources available within their own organisation. These services are specific to the institution and only available to students enrolled at that institution. However, some Tertiary information published is generic and may be helpful to the greater Providers international student community. NZQA Approved Wellington Tertiary Providers Provider Name Type Address Email Website Elite Management PTE Levels 3,4 & 6 [email protected] www.ems.ac.nz School Grand Central Tower 76 - 86 Manners St Wellington NZ Institute PTE NZIS Stadium Centre wellington@nzis. www.nzis.ac.nz of Sport Westpac Stadium ac.nz 105 Waterloo Quay Wellington NZ School of PTE Level 10, 57 Willis St [email protected] www.acupuncture. Acupuncture Wellington ac.nz and TCM NZ School PTE Te Whaea: dance@ www. of Dance National Dance and nzschoolofdance. nzschoolofdance. Drama Centre ac.nz ac.nz 11 Hutchison Rd Newtown, Wellington Te Kura Toi PTE Te Whaea: drama@toiwhakaari. www.toiwhakaari. Whakaari o National Dance and ac.nz ac.nz Aotearoa: Drama Centre NZ Drama School 11 Hutchison Rd Newtown, Wellington Te Rito Maioha: PTE Ground Floor studentservices@ www.ecnz.ac.nz Early Childhood 191 Thorndon Quay ecnz.ac.nz NZ Inc. Wellington The Learning PTE 182 Eastern Hutt Rd [email protected] www.tlc.ac.nz Connexion Ltd Taita, Lower Hutt 2 Provider Name Type Address Email Website The Salvation PTE 20 William Booth michelle_collins@ www.salvationarmy.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish with a Mission by Geoff Pryor
    Parish with a Mission By Geoff Pryor Foreword - The Parish Today The train escaping Wellington darts first into one tunnel and then into another long, dark tunnel. Leaving behind the bustle of the city, it bursts into a verdant valley and slithers alongside a steep banked but quiet stream all the way to Porirua. It hurtles through the Tawa and Porirua parishes before pulling into Paremata to empty its passengers on the southern outskirts of the Plimmerton parish. The train crosses the bridge at Paremata with Pauatahanui in the background. There is no sign that the train has arrived anywhere particularly significant. There is no outstanding example of engineering feat or architecture, no harbour for ocean going ships or airport. No university campus holds its youth in place. No football stadium echoes to the roar of the crowd. The whaling days have gone and the totara is all felled. Perhaps once Plimmerton was envisaged as the port for the Wellington region, and at one time there was a proposal to build a coal fired generator on the point of the headland. Nothing came of these ideas. All that passed us by and what we are left with is largely what nature intended. Beaches, rocky outcrops, cliffs, rolling hills and wooded valleys, magnificent sunsets and misted coastline. Inland, just beyond Pauatahanui, the little church of St. Joseph, like a broody white hen nestles on its hill top. Just north of Plimmerton, St. Theresa's church hides behind its hedge from the urgency of the main road north. The present day parish stretches in an L shape starting at Pukerua Bay through to Pauatahanui.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Plimmerton School (2960) Charter Approved
    School Charter, Strategic & Annual Implementation Plan 2021 - 2023 March 2021 1 Te Kura o Taupō Plimmerton School Contents Introductory Section Description of the school 3 Major historical developments 4 Motto and mission 5 Vision 6 Values 7 Cultural diversity and Maori dimension 8 National Education and Learning Priorities 9 Strategic Plan Section Strategic Plan 2021-23 10 Annual Plan Section Refer to separate Annual plan spreadsheet APPROVED: March 2021 Page 2 Te Kura o Taupō Plimmerton School Description of the School Plimmerton School is a year 1 to 8 decile 10 school with a roll close to 500 students at the year end. The school includes 14% Maori students, 4% Pasific Peoples, 7% Asian, 73% NZ European, and 3% of other ethnic groups. Nestled in the coastal town of Plimmerton, north of Porirua city, we enjoy a unique combination of village community lifestyle, and the advantages of close proximity to city life. We are set 300m from the sea on a large site. Facilities include 23 classrooms, a field, a large hall/auditorium, a heated covered swimming pool, a technology centre, and a new library completed in 2020. Local iwi The original settlement of Hongoeka, today an active Ngati Toa marae with a wharenui, provides cultural richness and opportunity to the Plimmerton community. We share a close association with local iwi and Hongoeka, with a representative co-opted to the Board of Trustees. The school fosters participation and success of Maori students through Maori educational initiatives consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi such as the instruction in tikanga Maori and Te Reo Maori.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington
    Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington This report has been prepared for Wellington City Council and is not intended for general publication or circulation. It is not to be reproduced without written agreement. We accept no responsibility to any party, unless specifically agreed by us in writing. We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to revise or amend our report in light of any additional information, which was in existence when the report was prepared, but which was not brought to our attention. Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington Background 1. Background KPQ is strategically located in Ngauranga Gorge, on State Highway 1 within Wellington City. The quarry is a hard rock quarry extracting greywacke. The KPQ site also hosts: An asphalt plant owned and operated by Downer, and A concrete plant owned and operated by Allied Concrete in which Holcim has a 50% holding. There are long term supply agreements in place with these businesses which provide both long term stability and sales, with the advantage of having exposure to both roading and construction based sales. This provides balance if there are short term fluctuations in either market. There is reasonable ability to adjust production between either market. There are limited sources of aggregate material in the region. The greywacke rock resource reserves along the Wellington Fault have for many decades been the prime source of the hard rock quarried for use in the wider Wellington and Hutt Valley areas. Ngauranga Gorge has been quarried for over 100 years. 1920 Quarry activity in Ngauranga Gorge:Track & Stream (Alexander Turnbull Library) Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington Regional Rock Resources and Alternatives 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring Deception : Community Art in the Suburbs of Aotearoa
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Caring Deception: Community art in the suburbs of Aotearoa (New Zealand) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fine Arts at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand. By Tim Barlow 2016 2 Abstract In Aotearoa (New Zealand), community art practice has a disadvantaged status and a poorly documented national history. This thesis reinvigorates the theory and practice of community art and cultural democracy using adaptable and context-specific analyses of the ways that aesthetics and ethics can usefully co-exist in practices of social change. The community art projects in this thesis were based in four suburbs lying on the economic and spatial fringes of Aotearoa. Over 4 years, I generated a comparative and iterative methodology challenging major binaries of the field, including: ameliorative vs. disruptive; coloniser vs. colonised; instrumental vs. instrumentalised; and long term vs. short term. This thesis asserts that these binaries create a series of impasses that drive the practice towards two new artistic categories, which I define as caring deception and the facade. All the projects I undertook were situated in contested space, where artists working with communities overlapped with local and national governments aiming for CBD and suburban re-vitalisation, creative city style initiatives, community development, grassroots creative projects, and curated public-art festivals.
    [Show full text]
  • PLIMMERTON FARM SUBMISSION | K BEAMSLEY Page 1
    PLIMMERTON FARM – PLAN CHANGE PROPOSAL Supporting Documentation View from Submitters Property Karla and Trevor Beamsley 24 Motuhara Road Plimmerton PLIMMERTON FARM SUBMISSION | K BEAMSLEY Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION The village of Plimmerton is a northern suburb of Porirua, and is surrounded to the North and East by farmland. It represents the edge of existing residential dwellings. Generally existing homes are stand-alone dwellings on lots greater than 500m² in size. Most residents within Plimmerton and Camborne either commute into Wellington city or work from home. The demand for housing in this area is from professional couples or families looking for 3 – 4 bedroom family homes on a section with space for kids to run around in, not medium or high density three-storey buildings and apartments, this is reflected in the TPG report to PCC (Dec 2019). Medium density style townhouses, or apartments would be totally out of character of the surrounding residential areas, and would present a stark contrast to the remaining rural areas which bound the site. The Plimmerton Farm site is not located close to areas of high employment, nor is it close to local amenities like the main shopping areas of Porirua. The site is also not located within an area currently supported by existing infrastructure. Much of the infrastructure in the area is aging, and requires repair or upgrade to support existing demands. Therefore, the idea that Plimmerton Farm would provide homes in a location close to employment, amenities and infrastructure1 is simply incorrect in terms of a 10-year time frame. Areas where this would be true include the currently developing areas of Aotea, Whitby, Kenepuru, and Porirua East.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUNDUP CAFÉ SUBMISSION - ADDENDUM by Pauatahanui Residents Association
    GROUNDUP CAFÉ SUBMISSION - ADDENDUM by Pauatahanui Residents Association This paper is prepared for the Pauatahanui Residents Association’s oral Submission to the Hearing on the GroundUp Cafe’s retrospective application for Resource Consent to legalise building extensions and additional Cafe seating capacity from 35 to 65. This updates our original submission of February 2014 , and includes responses to subsequent information received from the applicant and Porirua City Council and since our original submission was made some issues have changed. TERMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT GroundUp Café (the Café ) Rural Trading Post (the Trading Post ) Pauatahanui General Store (the Store ) Porirua City Council ( PCC ) Pauatahanui Residents Association ( PRA ) BACKGROUND • The PRA is: o A voluntary organization started as an Incorporated society in 1975. o A registered charity 1 since June 2008 o Its objectives include 3a) to maintain or improve the community and its environment for all residents while preserving its rural character and scenery. • There are approximately 300 households in the Pauatahanui area. The Association currently has 57 paid up member households. It has 177 people registered on its mailing list for monthly newsletters or notices. Newsletters are also circulated to other groups who distribute them more widely to their members. Notices and newsletters are also posted on PRA’s website 2. PRA’s original submission has been available on this website since February 2014. 1 Registered Charity Number CC42516 2 www.pauatahanui.org.nz Pauatahanui Residents Association (PRA) Version: 17/11/2014 - Page 1 Application on GroundUp Café Submission (Addendum) – Lot 1 DP7316 at 15 Paekakariki Hill Road, Pauatahanui • In addition, PRA uses the Rural Delivery to periodically share information or invite comment on important issues sent out as a community notice to all 300 households.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Runanga O Toa Rangatira Inc Group
    Te Runanga o Toa RangaTiRa inc Group 2018 ANNUAL REPORT (1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018) Upane ka upane whiti te ra Advancing together into a brighter future Moemoea Kia tu ai a Ngāti Toa Rangatira; Hei iwi Toa, hei iwi Rangatira Ngāti Toa is a strong, vibrant and influential Iwi, firmly grounded in our cultural identity and leading change to enable whanau wellbeing and prosperity CONTENTS 2 | Contents 3 | Executives, Directors, Trustees, Committees 4 | Chairman’s Report 6 | Executive Directors Report Pitopito Korero 8 | Administration / Communication 10 | Resource Management 11 | Toa Rangatira Education Achievement Team 12 | Te Puna Reo o Ngati Toa 15 | Te Puna Matauranga 18 | Disability Service 19 | Ora Toa Mauriora 24 | Ora Toa PHO Purongo Putea 25 | Te Runanga o Toa Rangatira Incorporated Group 66 | Toa Rangatira Trust Group 92 | Ora Toa PHO 108 | Ika Toa Limited 132 | Additional Financial Information 2 | W h ā r a n g i EXECUTIVES, DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES, COMMITTEES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: TE AWARUA O PORIRUA AUDIT, RISK & INVESTMENT Matiu Rei WHAITUA COMMITTEE: COMMITTEE: Hikitia Ropata Miria Pomare, Chair BOARD / TRUSTEES Jennie Smeaton Caroline Taurima Taku Parai Elected – Chair Sharli Jo Solomon Francis Freemantle Helmut Modlik Willis Katene Elected – Deputy Ian Lyver Arthur Selwyn Takapuwahia Marae WHAITUA TE WHANGANUI-A- Kyle Edmonds Matthew Solomon Takapuwahia Marae TARA: Patariki Hippolite Whakatu Marae Matiu Rei Miria Pomare Hongoeka Marae Taku Parai NGATI TOA / RUNANGA Moana Parata Hongoeka Marae REPRESENTATIVES: Tracey Williams
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Snapshot of Porirua
    HISTORICAL SNAPSHOT OF PORIRUA This report details the history of Porirua in order to inform the development of a ‘decolonised city’. It explains the processes which have led to present day Porirua City being as it is today. It begins by explaining the city’s origins and its first settlers, describing not only the first people to discover and settle in Porirua, but also the migration of Ngāti Toa and how they became mana whenua of the area. This report discusses the many theories on the origin and meaning behind the name Porirua, before moving on to discuss the marae establishments of the past and present. A large section of this report concerns itself with the impact that colonisation had on Porirua and its people. These impacts are physically repre- sented in the city’s current urban form and the fifth section of this report looks at how this development took place. The report then looks at how legislation has impacted on Ngāti Toa’s ability to retain their land and their recent response to this legislation. The final section of this report looks at the historical impact of religion, particularly the impact of Mormonism on Māori communities. Please note that this document was prepared using a number of sources and may differ from Ngati Toa Rangatira accounts. MĀORI SETTLEMENT The site where both the Porirua and Pauatahanui inlets meet is called Paremata Point and this area has been occupied by a range of iwi and hapū since at least 1450AD (Stodart, 1993). Paremata Point was known for its abundant natural resources (Stodart, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Schedules Schedules 12 Schedules
    12 Schedules 12 Schedules 12 Schedules 12 Schedules contents Schedule Page number Schedule A: Outstanding water bodies A1-A3 279 Schedule B: Ngā Taonga Nui a Kiwa B 281 Schedule C: Sites with significant mana whenua values C1-C5 294 Schedule D: Statutory Acknowledgements D1-D2 304 Schedule E: Sites with significant historic heritage values E1-E5 333 Schedule F: Ecosystems and habitats with significant indigenous biodiversity values F1-F5 352 Schedule G: Principles to be applied when proposing and considering mitigation and G 407 offsetting in relation to biodiversity Schedule H: Contact recreation and Māori customary use H1-H2 410 Schedule I: Important trout fishery rivers and spawning waters I 413 Schedule J: Significant geological features in the coastal marine area J 415 Schedule K: Significant surf breaks K 418 Schedule L: Air quality L1-L2 420 Schedule M: Community drinking water supply abstraction points M1-M2 428 Schedule N: Stormwater management strategy N 431 Schedule O: Plantation forestry harvest plan O 433 Schedule P: Classifying and managing groundwater and surface water connectivity P 434 Schedule Q: Reasonable and efficient use criteria Q 436 Schedule R: Guideline for stepdown allocations R 438 Schedule S: Guideline for measuring and reporting of water takes S 439 Schedule T: Pumping test T 440 Schedule U:Trigger levels for river and stream mouth cutting U 442 PROPOSED NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN FOR THE WELLINGTON REGION (31.07.2015) 278 Schedule A: Outstanding water bodies Schedule A1: Rivers with outstanding indigenous ecosystem
    [Show full text]
  • Paremata Village Plan 2012
    Paremata Village Plan 2012 1 Introduction It’s my very great pleasure to introduce this first edition of the Paremata Village Plan, covering the suburbs of Paremata (which now includes Mana) and Papakowhai. Our plan has been developed in accordance with the Porirua City Council (PCC) Village Planning Programme, an award-winning Council initiative to improve and develop Porirua’s suburban communities through work programmes developed in partnership with the people of those communities. For further information on the Village Planning Programme please go to the PCC Website www.pcc.govt.nz and search under Community, Village Planning. I would like to thank on your behalf the PCC Villages Programme manager Ian Barlow and his team for all the work they have done to get this plan off the ground. My thanks in particular to Jenny Lester, who has been our liaison person and has taken on most of the development work including running surveys of residents to build a picture of what we want our ‘village’ to look like in future. A huge thank you to the 300+ residents who participated in the concept, development, content and comments used in this plan. Here is our template for that vision, now it’s up to us all to contribute to making that vision a reality. Terry Knight President Paremata Residents Association Vision Statement Paremata – where community and environment are in harmony, protecting the best of what we have and embracing the best of what’s new. About Paremata The area covered by the Paremata Residents Association takes in several suburbs; Paremata, Papakowhai, Mana and a section of Camborne.
    [Show full text]