DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Egyptian Hieroglyphs by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 08.10.17 Word Count 711 Level 840L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Egyptian Hieroglyphs by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 08.10.17 Word Count 711 Level 840L Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 5 5/4 - 5/8 Name Date: Per The Evolution of Egyptian Hieroglyphs By Ancient History Encyclopedia, adapted by Newsela staff on 08.10.17 Word Count 711 Level 840L Stele of the scribe Minnakht around 1321 B.C. Scribes were very educated and often worked with painters and artisans. Together, they made hieroglyphs like this one. Photo by: Clio20/Wikimedia Commons. The early Egyptians wrote using a system called hieroglyphics. They used elegant pictures, or hieroglyphs, instead of letters. In the ancient Egyptian language, hieroglyphs were called medu netjer, or "the gods' words." It was believed that writing was invented by the gods. The Egyptians used a large number of different hieroglyphs. The English alphabet has 26 letters, but the Egyptians may have had more than 1,000 hieroglyphs. The gift of writing According to Egyptian tradition, the god Thoth created writing to make the Egyptians wiser and to strengthen their memory. The god Re, however, said that giving writing to humans was a bad idea. He thought that people should use their minds instead of texts. In Re's view, writing would make people less wise and give them a poor memory. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 5 5/4 - 5/8 Still, Thoth gave writing to a small number of Egyptians, called the scribes. In ancient Egypt, scribes were very respected for their knowledge. They were the only ones who could read and write. Pictures in place of words Before hieroglyphics, the first Egyptians drew pictures on rock walls. Some of the signs on these rock images are also found on pottery from 3500–3200 B.C., more than 5,000 years ago. The pots were buried in the tombs of rich Egyptians. One of these tombs is inside a cemetery called Abydos. In this tomb, hundreds of jars were found with labels on them. The labels said where the goods came from, who owned them or what was inside them. The Egyptians were very careful about keeping records. The labels found in the tomb were carved on small rectangles of wood or bone. Usually, the Egyptians wrote on a kind of thick paper called papyrus. They also used bone, metal and leather as tools for writing. A life story carved in stone By 3000 B.C., the Egyptians carved hieroglyphs into special stones when a ruler died. On the stone, they wrote about the king's life and his great actions. Around 2500 B.C. the Egyptians wrote the "Pyramid Texts." These were found on the walls of pyramids and are some of the oldest examples of Egyptian literature. Over time, many new forms of writing were used. Priests and scribes, the expert writers of the kingdom, wanted to make hieroglyphics simpler. By the year 600 A.D., script in Egypt did not use pictures at all. A form of hieroglyphics was still used, but mostly for important religious writings. Christianity brought its own alphabet From 332 B.C. to about A.D. 395, Greek and Roman culture started to influence Egypt more. These cultures came from Europe on the other side of the Mediterranean Sea. Toward A.D. 100, the religion of Christianity started to take over the Egyptian religion. Christian Egyptians wrote using the Coptic alphabet, a different version of the Egyptian language. This alphabet had 32 letters. Examples of the Coptic alphabet were found sometime around A.D. 200. Egyptian hieroglyphs were replaced by the Coptic alphabet. The written language of the old gods disappeared for nearly 2,000 years. The mysterious Rosetta Stone This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 5 5/4 - 5/8 For many years, no one knew how to read hieroglyphs anymore. Then, in 1799, the Rosetta Stone was discovered. On this stone, a speech by the Egyptian king Ptolemy V from 196 B.C. had been written down. The same text was written in three languages, once in Greek, once in hieroglyphics and once in another Egyptian script called demotic. Demotic was a kind of writing that came later and had no pictures. A man named Jean-François Champollion used the Rosetta Stone to crack the code of hieroglyphs. He compared the Egyptian signs with the Greek words he knew. He figured out how to write the name of Ptolemy V. Then, he compared the words with other objects found in Egypt. He found out that ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing was not a normal alphabet. Its pictures stood for sounds, ideas and words, not letters. Champollion discovered the secret of ancient Egyptian writing and allowed the world to finally learn about Egyptian history. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Ms. Kimball History- 6th Grade Week 5 5/4 - 5/8 Quiz 1 What effect did Christianity have on Egyptian hieroglyphs? (A) Hieroglyphs were introduced to Egypt by Christians who arrived from Europe. (B) Christian Egyptians combined hieroglyphics with the Coptic alphabet to form demotic script. (C) Christianity was brought to Egypt by the Greeks and Romans, who then adopted Egyptian hieroglyphs. (D) The Coptic alphabet used by Christians replaced Egyptian hieroglyphs. 2 According to the section "The gift of writing," how did Egyptians learn to write? (A) Thoth gave writing to scribes so that Egyptians could become wiser and have stronger memories. (B) Re realized that people's memories were poor, so he gave them writing to help them to remember their history. (C) Scribes worked together to come up with a language that would help them to communicate with the gods. (D) Egyptians adopted a language from ancient religious texts and learned about the gods Thoth and Re. 3 Examine the three photographs within the article. What do the photographs show about hieroglyphs? (A) They show how different hieroglyphs were put together to form complex words. (B) They show the many different symbols used to compose a hieroglyphic inscription. (C) They show how Egyptians used hieroglyphs in their daily lives. (D) They show the complicated writing process Egyptians used to be able to communicate in hieroglyphs. 4 Examine the image in the section "The mysterious Rosetta Stone" and read the selection below. For many years, no one knew how to read hieroglyphs anymore. Then, in 1799, the Rosetta Stone was discovered. On this stone, a speech by the Egyptian King Ptolemy V from 196 B.C. had been written down. The same text was written in three languages, once in Greek, once in hieroglyphics and once in another Egyptian script called demotic. Demotic was a kind of writing that came later and had no pictures. How does the image support the information in the selection above? (A) It illustrates the author's claim that Egyptian hieroglyphics were influenced by Greek and demotic texts by highlighting the three kinds of texts. (B) It shows that Rosetta Stone was written and carved in 1799 to preserve ancient Egyptian, Greek, and demotic writing. (C) It illustrates the author's description that the same text was written in three different languages to enable the translation of hieroglyphs. (D) It shows how Jean-François Champollion used the carved Rosetta stone to translate Egyptian hieroglyphs. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jssea 42 (2015-2016) 71
    Demotic and Hieratic Scholia in Funerary Papyri and their Implications for the Manufacturing Process1 Foy Scalf Abstract: Many ancient Egyptian papyrus manuscripts inscribed with funerary compositions contain annotations within the text and margins. Some of these annotations relate directly to the production process for illustrating and inscribing the manuscripts by providing instructions for scribes and artists. Two overlooked examples, pKhaemhor (MMA 25.3.212) and pRyerson (OIM E9787), allow for new interpretations of parallel texts previously considered as labels or captions. An analysis of the corpus of scholia and marginalia demonstrates specific manufacturing proclivities for selective groups of texts, while simultaneously revealing a wide variety of possible construction sequences and techniques in others. Résumé: Plusieurs manuscrits anciens de papyrus égyptiens sur lesquels sont inscrites des compositions funéraires contiennent des annotations dans le texte et dans les marges. Certaines de ces annotations sont directement liées au processus de production relatif à l’illustration et à l’inscription des manuscrits en donnant des instructions destinées aux scribes et aux artistes. Deux exemples négligés, le pKhaemhor (MMA 25.3.212) et le pRyerson (OIM E9787), permettent de nouvelles interprétations de textes parallèles précédemment considérés comme des étiquettes ou des légendes. Une analyse du corpus des scholia et marginalia démontre des tendances de fabrication spécifiques pour des groupes particuliers de textes, tout en révélant simultanément une grande variété de séquences et de techniques de construction dans d'autres cas. Keywords: Book of the Dead – Funerary Papyri – Scholia – Marginalia – Hieratic – Demotic Mots-clés: Livre des Morts – Papyrus funéraire – Scholia – Marginalia – hiératique – démotique The production of illustrated funerary papyri in ancient Egypt was a complex and expensive process that often involved the efforts of a team of skilled scribes and artisans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Language Was Created by Sumerian Turks
    Advances in Anthropology, 2017, 7, 197-250 http://www.scirp.org/journal/aa ISSN Online: 2163-9361 ISSN Print: 2163-9353 The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Language Was Created by Sumerian Turks Metin Gündüz Retired Physician, Diplomate ABEM (American Board of Emergency Medicine), Izmir, Turkey How to cite this paper: Gündüz, M. (2017). Abstract The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Lan- guage Was Created by Sumerian Turks. The “phonetic sound value of each and every hieroglyphic picture’s expressed Advances in Anthropology, 7, 197-250. and intended meaning as a verb or as a noun by the creators of the ancient https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2017.74013 Egyptian hieroglyphic picture symbols, ‘exactly matches’, the same meaning” Received: August 2, 2017 as well as the “first letter of the corresponding meaning of the Turkish word’s Accepted: October 13, 2017 first syllable” with the currently spoken dialects of the Turkish language. The Published: October 16, 2017 exact intended sound value as well as the meaning of hieroglyphic pictures as Copyright © 2017 by author and nouns or verbs is individually and clearly expressed in the original hierog- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. lyphic pictures. This includes the 30 hieroglyphic pictures of well-known con- This work is licensed under the Creative sonants as well as some vowel sounds-of the language of the ancient Egyp- Commons Attribution International tians. There is no exception to this rule. Statistical and probabilistic certainty License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ beyond any reasonable doubt proves the Turkish language connection. The Open Access hieroglyphic pictures match with 2 variables (the phonetic value and intended meaning).
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Hieroglyphs CEEG 0909 a Workbook for an Introduction to Egyptian Hieroglyphs
    An Introduction to Egyptian Hieroglyphs CEEG 0909 A Workbook for An Introduction to Egyptian Hieroglyphs C. Casey Wilbour Hall 301 christian [email protected] April 9, 2018 Contents Syllabus 2 Day 1 11 1-I-1 Rosetta Stone ................................................. 11 1-I-2 Calligraphy Practice 1 { Uniliterals ..................................... 13 1-I-4 Meet Your Classmates ............................................ 16 1-I-5 The Begatitudes ............................................... 17 1-I-6 Vocabulary { Uniliterals & Classifiers ................................... 19 Day 2 25 2-I-1 Timeline of Egyptian Languages ...................................... 25 2-I-2 Calligraphy Practice 2 { Biliterals ..................................... 27 2-I-3 Biliteral Chart ................................................ 32 2-I-4 Vocabulary { Biliterals & Classifiers .................................... 33 2-II-3 Vocabulary { Household Objects ...................................... 37 Day 3 39 3-I-1 Calligraphy Practice 3 { Multiliterals & Common Classifiers ....................... 39 3-I-2 Vocabulary { Multiliterals & Classifiers .................................. 43 3-I-3 Vocabulary { Suffix Pronouns, Parts of the Body ............................. 45 3-I-4 Parts of the Body .............................................. 47 3-II-3 Homework { Suffix Pronouns & Parts of the Body ............................ 48 Day 4 49 4-I-1 Vocabulary { Articles, Independent Pronouns, Family, Deities ...................... 49 4-I-4 Gods and Goddesses ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Systems Reading and Spelling
    Writing systems Reading and spelling Writing systems LING 200: Introduction to the Study of Language Hadas Kotek February 2016 Hadas Kotek Writing systems Writing systems Reading and spelling Outline 1 Writing systems 2 Reading and spelling Spelling How we read Slides credit: David Pesetsky, Richard Sproat, Janice Fon Hadas Kotek Writing systems Writing systems Reading and spelling Writing systems What is writing? Writing is not language, but merely a way of recording language by visible marks. –Leonard Bloomfield, Language (1933) Hadas Kotek Writing systems Writing systems Reading and spelling Writing systems Writing and speech Until the 1800s, writing, not spoken language, was what linguists studied. Speech was often ignored. However, writing is secondary to spoken language in at least 3 ways: Children naturally acquire language without being taught, independently of intelligence or education levels. µ Many people struggle to learn to read. All human groups ever encountered possess spoken language. All are equal; no language is more “sophisticated” or “expressive” than others. µ Many languages have no written form. Humans have probably been speaking for as long as there have been anatomically modern Homo Sapiens in the world. µ Writing is a much younger phenomenon. Hadas Kotek Writing systems Writing systems Reading and spelling Writing systems (Possibly) Independent Inventions of Writing Sumeria: ca. 3,200 BC Egypt: ca. 3,200 BC Indus Valley: ca. 2,500 BC China: ca. 1,500 BC Central America: ca. 250 BC (Olmecs, Mayans, Zapotecs) Hadas Kotek Writing systems Writing systems Reading and spelling Writing systems Writing and pictures Let’s define the distinction between pictures and true writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Literature
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of Egyptian Literature This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Egyptian Literature Release Date: March 8, 2009 [Ebook 28282] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EGYPTIAN LITERATURE*** Egyptian Literature Comprising Egyptian Tales, Hymns, Litanies, Invocations, The Book Of The Dead, And Cuneiform Writings Edited And With A Special Introduction By Epiphanius Wilson, A.M. New York And London The Co-Operative Publication Society Copyright, 1901 The Colonial Press Contents Special Introduction. 2 The Book Of The Dead . 7 A Hymn To The Setting Sun . 7 Hymn And Litany To Osiris . 8 Litany . 9 Hymn To R ....................... 11 Hymn To The Setting Sun . 15 Hymn To The Setting Sun . 19 The Chapter Of The Chaplet Of Victory . 20 The Chapter Of The Victory Over Enemies. 22 The Chapter Of Giving A Mouth To The Overseer . 24 The Chapter Of Giving A Mouth To Osiris Ani . 24 Opening The Mouth Of Osiris . 25 The Chapter Of Bringing Charms To Osiris . 26 The Chapter Of Memory . 26 The Chapter Of Giving A Heart To Osiris . 27 The Chapter Of Preserving The Heart . 28 The Chapter Of Preserving The Heart . 29 The Chapter Of Preserving The Heart . 30 The Chapter Of Preserving The Heart . 30 The Heart Of Carnelian . 31 Preserving The Heart . 31 Preserving The Heart .
    [Show full text]
  • I) If\L /-,7\ .L Ii Lo N\ C, ' II Ii Abstract Approved: 1'
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Asaad AI-Saleh for the Master of Arts Degree In English presented on _------'I'--'I--'J:..=u:o...1VL.c2=0"--'0"-=S'------ _ Title: Mustafa Sadiq al-Rafii: A Non-recognized Voice in the Chorus ofthe Arabic Literary Revival i) If\l /-,7\ .L Ii lo n\ C, ' II Ii Abstract Approved: 1'. C". C ,\,,: 41-------<..<.LI-hY,-""lA""""","""I,--ft-'t _ '" I) Abstract Mustafa Sadiq al-Rafii, a modem Egyptian writer with classical style, is not studied by scholars of Arabic literature as are his contemporary liberals, such as Taha Hussein. This thesis provides a historical background and a brief literary survey that helps contextualize al-Rafii, the period, and the area he came from. AI-Rafii played an important role in the two literary and intellectual schools during the Arabic literary revival, which extended from the French expedition (1798-1801) to around the middle of the twentieth century. These two schools, known as the Old and the New, vied to shape the literature and thought of Egypt and other Arab countries. The former, led by al-Rafii, promoted a return to classical Arabic styles and tried to strengthen the Islamic identity of Egypt. The latter called for cutting off Egypt from its Arabic history and rejected the dominance and continuity of classical Arabic language. AI-Rafii contributed to the Revival by supporting a line ofthought that has not been favored by pro-Westernization governments, which made his legacy almost forgotten. Deriving his literature from the canon of Arabic language, culture, and history, al-Rafii produced a literature based on a revived version of classical Arabic literature, an accomplishment which makes him unique among modem Arab writers.
    [Show full text]
  • ETYMOLOGY. the Coptic Language Comprises an Autochthonous
    (CE:A118a-A124b) ETYMOLOGY. The Coptic language comprises an autochthonous vocabulary (see VOCABULARY OF EGYPTIAN ORIGIN and VOCABULARY OF SEMITIC ORIGIN) with an overlay of several heterogeneous strata (see VOCABULARY, COPTO-GREEK and VOCABULARY, COPTO-ARABIC). As a rule, etymologic research in Coptology is limited to the autochthonous vocabulary. Etymology (from Greek etymos, true, and logos, word) is the account of the origin, the meaning, and the phonetics of a word over the course of time and the comparison of it with cognate or similar terms. In Coptic the basic vocabulary, as well as the morphology of the language, is of Egyptian origin. Egyptian shares many words and all its morphology (grammatical forms) with the Semitic languages. Egyptian is transcribed with an alphabet of twenty-four letters in the following order: 3, „ , ‘, w, b, p, f, m, n, r, h, , , h, z, s, , (sometimes transcribed q), k, g, t, t, d, d. All these letters represent consonants. The sign 3 is the glottal stop heard at the commencement of German words beginning with a vowel (die Oper) or Hebrew aleph; „ is y in “yes,” but sometimes pronounced like aleph; ‘ is called ‘ayin, as in Hebrew, the emphatic correspondent to aleph (cf. Arabic ‘Abdallah); h is the English h; is an emphatic h, as in Arabic Mu ammad; is the Scotch ch in loch; h is like German ch in ich (between and ), and nearly like English h in human; is English sh in “ship”; t is ch in English “child”; and d is English j in ‘joke.” The group „„ is pronounced y.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonconcatenative Morphology in Coptic
    UC Santa Cruz Phonology at Santa Cruz, Volume 7 Title Nonconcatenative Morphology in Coptic Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0765s94q Author Kramer, Ruth Publication Date 2018-04-10 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nonconcatenative Morphology in Coptic ∗∗∗ Ruth Kramer 1. Introduction One of the most distinctive features of many Afroasiatic languages is nonconcatenative morphology. Instead of attaching an affix directly before or after a root, languages like Modern Hebrew interleave an affix within the segments of a root. An example is in (1). (1) Modern Hebrew gadal ‘he grew’ gidel ‘he raised’ gudal ‘he was raised’ In the mini-paradigm in (1), the discontinuous affixes /a a/, /i e/, and /u a/ are systematically interleaved between the root consonants /g d l/ to indicate perfective aspect, causation and voice, respectively. The consonantal root /g d l/ ‘big’ never surfaces on its own in the language: it must be inflected with some vocalic affix. Additional Afroasiatic languages with nonconcatenative morphology include other Semitic languages like Arabic (McCarthy 1979, 1981; McCarthy and Prince 1990), many Ethiopian Semitic languages (Rose 1997, 2003), and Modern Aramaic (Hoberman 1989), as well as non-Semitic languages like Berber (Dell and Elmedlaoui 1992, Idrissi 2000) and Egyptian (also known as Ancient Egyptian, the autochthonous language of Egypt; Gardiner 1957, Reintges 1994). The nonconcatenative morphology of Afroasiatic languages has come to be known as root and pattern
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Brief Introduction to Hieratic
    A Very Brief Introduction to Hieratic Joshua Aaron ROBERSON rev 1.0 (Spring 2018) Contents About this document .................................................................................................. 3 General references ..................................................................................................... 4 §1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 §2 Basic Strategies: Context. Mono-literals, Determinatives, and Logograms. Gestalt ... 6 §3 Abbreviated signs. Common bi- and tri-literal signs ................................................ 9 §4 Dissimilar Hieroglyphic signs with similar Hieratic forms ........................................ 12 §5 Similar Hieroglyphic signs with dissimilar Hieratic forms ........................................ 13 §6 Signs with reduced iconicity .................................................................................. 13 §7 Ligatures ............................................................................................................... 14 §8 Regnal dates ......................................................................................................... 15 §9 Numbers ............................................................................................................... 16 ROBERSON, Introduction to Hieratic. - 2 - About this document The present, short Introduction was designed as an overview of the basic principles of the Hieratic script, in conjunction with a representative
    [Show full text]
  • The Writing of the Birds. Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Before and After the Founding of Alexandria1
    The Writing of the Birds. Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Before and After the Founding of Alexandria1 Stephen Quirke, UCL Institute of Archaeology Abstract As Okasha El Daly has highlighted, qalam al-Tuyur “script of the birds” is one of the Arabic names used by the writers of the Ayyubid period and earlier to describe ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. The name may reflect the regular choice of Nile birds as signs for several consonants in the Ancient Egyptian language, such as the owl for “m”. However, the term also finds an ancestor in a rarer practice of hieroglyph users centuries earlier. From the Ptolemaic and Roman Periods and before, cursive manuscripts have preserved a list of sounds in the ancient Egyptian language, in the sequence used for the alphabet in South Arabian scripts known in Arabia before Arabic. The first “letter” in the hieroglyphic version is the ibis, the bird of Thoth, that is, of knowledge, wisdom and writing. In this paper I consider the research of recent decades into the Arabian connections to this “bird alphabet”. 1. Egyptological sources beyond traditional Egyptology Whether in our first year at school, or in our last year of university teaching, as life-long learners we engage with both empirical details, and frameworks of thought. In the history of ideas, we might borrow the names “philology” for the attentive study of the details, and “philosophy” for traditions of theoretical thinking.2As the classical Arabic tradition demonstrates in the wide scope of its enquiry and of its output, the quest for knowledge must combine both directions of research in order to move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rosetta Stone, British Museum, London Hieroglyphic, [From the Greek=Priestly Carving], Type of Writing Used in Ancient Egypt
    T h e R o s e t t a S t o n e Languages: Egyptian and Greek, Using three scripts -- Hieroglyphic, Demotic Egyptian, and Greek. Found 1799 by the French in Egypt Originally from 196 B.C. The Rosetta Stone, British Museum, London Hieroglyphic, [from the Greek=priestly carving], type of writing used in ancient Egypt. Similar pictographic styles of Crete, Asia Minor, and Central America and Mexico are also called hieroglyphics. Interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphics, begun by Thomas Young and J. F. Champollion and others, is virtually complete. The meanings of hieroglyphics often seem arbitrary and are seldom obvious. Egyptian hieroglyphics were already perfected in the first dynasty (3110-2884 B.C.), but they began to go out of use in the Middle Kingdom and after 500 B.C. were virtually unused. There were basically 604 symbols that might be put to three types of uses (although few were used for all three purposes). 1) They could be used as ideograms, as when a sign resembling a snake meant "snake." [See chart above.] 2) They could be used as a phonogram (or a phonetic letter similar to our alphabet), as when the pictogram of an owl represented the sign or letter “m,” because the word for owl had “m” as its principal consonant sound. [It would be like us using a picture of a snake for the letter “s.”] 3) They could be used as a determinative, an unpronounced symbol placed after an ambiguous sign to indicate its classification (e.g., an eye to indicate that the preceding word has to do with looking or seeing).
    [Show full text]
  • Proto-Elamite
    L2/20­192 2020­09­21 Preliminary proposal to encode Proto­Elamite in Unicode Anshuman Pandey [email protected] pandey.github.io/unicode September 21, 2020 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Overview of the Sign Repertoire 3 2.1 Sign names . 4 2.2 Numeric signs . 4 2.3 Numeric signs with extended representations . 5 2.4 Complex capacity signs . 6 2.5 Complex graphemes . 7 2.6 Signs in compounds without independent attestation . 10 2.7 Alternate or variant forms . 11 2.8 Scribal designs . 11 3 Proposed Encoding Model 12 4 Proposed Characters 13 4.1 Numeric signs . 13 4.2 General ideographic signs . 17 5 Characters Not Suitable for Encoding 110 6 References 110 7 Acknowledgments 111 1 Preliminary proposal to encode Proto­Elamite in Unicode Anshuman Pandey 1 Introduction The term ‘Proto­Elamite’ refers to a writing system that was used at the beginning of the 3rd millenium BCE in the region to the east and southeast of Mesopotamia, known as Elam, which corresponds to the eastern portion of present­day Iran. The name was assigned by the French epigraphist Jean­Vincent Scheil in the early 20th century, who believed it to be the predecessor of a ‘proper’ Elamite script, which would have been used for recording the Elamite language, simply on account of the location of the tablets at Susa, which was the capital city of Elam. While no ‘proper’ descendent of the script has been identified, scholars continue to use the name ‘Proto­Elamite’ as a matter of convention (Dahl 2012: 2). Proto­Elamite is believed to have been developed from an accounting system used in Mesopotamia, in a manner similar to the development of ‘Proto­Cuneiform’.
    [Show full text]