(Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), Distribution, Egg Morphology and Description of a New Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), Distribution, Egg Morphology and Description of a New Species Stark, B.P., B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Sandberg, B.A. Gill, C.J. Verdone, and A.B. Harrison. 2015. Sierraperla Jewett 1954 (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), distribution, egg morphology and description of a new species. Illiesia, 11(02):8-22. Available online: http://illiesia.speciesfile.org/papers/Illiesia11-02.pdf http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CCD1B510-CED0-4701-AD61-94A988DB02D2 SIERRAPERLA JEWETT, 1954 (PLECOPTERA: PELTOPERLIDAE), DISTRIBUTION, EGG MORPHOLOGY AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES Bill P. Stark1, Boris C. Kondratieff2 John B. Sandberg3, Brian A. Gill2, Chris J. Verdone2, and Audrey B. Harrison4 1 Department of Biology, Box 4045, Mississippi College, Clinton, Mississippi, 39058,U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 3 Aquatic Bioassessment Lab,CDFW - CSUC Research Foundation, 233 Holt Hall, 1205 W 7th St., California State University, Chico, CA 95929-0555, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, 38677, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The genus Sierraperla Jewett is reviewed and a new species, S. tolowa is recognized. Data supporting recognition of the new species include scanning electron microscopy of egg chorion, adult external terminalia, morphology of internal male genitalia, adult pigment patterns, and DNA barcodes (cytochrome c oxidase I; COI). Keywords: Plecoptera, Peltoperlidae, Sierraperla, egg morphology, scanning electron microscopy, COI gene, cytochrome c oxidase I, DNA barcodes, new species INTRODUCTION later given full generic rank by Illies (1966) and has Sierraperla was proposed by Jewett (1954) as a remained monotypic, with S. cora (Needham & subgenus of Peltoperla, primarily on the basis of Smith 1916) the only recognized species. The type “…shape and location of the gills…” and locality for this species is given as “Reno, Nevada” “…additional details…” of the larval stage. by Needham & Smith (1916), but the holotype Sierraperla larvae differ in these characters from female was the only specimen known from Nevada those of Yoraperla, in which the sole species had until Richard L. Bottorff recently collected larval been placed by Ricker (1952). The subgenus was specimens in Douglas Co. and confirmed larval Illiesia – http://illiesia.speciesfile.org Volume 11 – Number 2 – Page 8 Stark, B.P., B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Sandberg, B.A. Gill, C.J. Verdone, and A.B. Harrison. 2015. Sierraperla Jewett 1954 (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), distribution, egg morphology and description of a new species. Illiesia, 11(02):8-22. Available online: http://illiesia.speciesfile.org/papers/Illiesia11-02.pdf records from other sites in Douglas Co., collected Much of the material for this study was by personnel of the Nevada Division of collected on the following expeditions to California Environmental Protection (Bottorff, personal and Oregon. communication). Needham & Claassen (1925) gave the first California record based on 14 adults July 1979: B. Stark, K.W. Stewart collected at Shasta Springs by C.L. Fox and E.P. May 1982: Stark, D. Zeigler Van Duzee, and Jewett (1954, 1960) gave records April 1987: B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, C.R. Nelson from five California counties (8 total sites) based on June 1991: B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, C. Henderson 17 specimens. Little additional data have appeared May 1998: B. Stark, C.R. Nelson, S.W. Szczytko, for Sierraperla, but Stark & Stewart (1981) examined I. Sivec, R. Bottorff specimens from Oregon (no specific locality given) May 2001: B. Stark, K.W. Stewart, J.B. Sandberg and California, in addition to the Nevada holotype, June 2004: B. Stark, R.W. Baumann and provided a synopsis of generic characters, and May 2007: B.C. Kondratieff, R.W. Baumann Stewart & Stark (1988, 2002) presented a larval June 2009: B. Stark, B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Sandberg, habitus prepared from a specimen collected at S.W. Szczytko, R.W. Baumann, A.B. Harrison Wrangle Camp in Jackson Co., Oregon. Nelson & May 2014: B. Stark, B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Stark (1987) reported three additional specimens Sandberg, C.J. Verdone, A.B. Harrison from California and Stark et al. (2008) reported 22 specimens from six sites in the Warner Mountains Larval specimens were hand-picked, usually of northeastern California. Stark & Stewart (1981) from wood in splash zones and preserved in 95% included three scanning electron microscopy ethanol or placed in cups of stream water and kept images of eggs taken from specimens from the Big on ice until they could be placed in rearing Spring, Mt. Shasta City Park, California facilities. Adult specimens were hand-picked from population. Zeigler & Stewart (1985) provided stream-side vegetation, or collected on beating details of the drumming signals from members of sheets and preserved in 75-80% ethanol. the same population, and Stewart & Stark (1988, Tissue samples from 46 specimens of larval 2002) suggested a probable semivoltine cycle with Sierraperla, one adult male Soliperla campanula extended emergence for the Sierraperla at that (Jewett 1954), and one adult female Yoraperla locality. Sandberg (2011) revised the Sierraperla mariana (Ricker 1952) were sent to the Canadian interval pattern from monophasic to varied beat- Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB) for sequencing. interval and detected differences between the Mitochondrial COI sequences (DNA barcodes) signals collected by Zeigler & Stewart (1985) and were uploaded to the Barcode of Life Database those collected by Sandberg (2011) from Butte (BOLD; Ratnasingham & Hebert 2007; Creek, California. http://www.boldsystems.org) to the dataset “DS- In this study, we examine egg morphology and SIERRA” which has been made publicly available. male genitalic structures for additional Sierraperla Additional sequences for Yoraperla brevis (Banks) populations in order to test the monotypic status (Process IDs: ABSTO026-09, ABSTO027-09, for the genus. We also present the first DNA ABSTO031-09, ABSTO032-09, BBEPT023-10) were barcodes, and compile published and unpublished downloaded from BOLD and included in our records in order to more precisely define the analysis. All sequences were aligned using distribution and relative abundance of the genus. MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) in MEGA6 (Tamura et al. Results from these studies suggest the presence of 2013). Estimates of genetic distance (divergence) a second species represented by the southern were calculated among specimens using the Oregon and northwestern California populations Kimura-2-parameter model (Kimura 1980) with a that we describe below. pairwise deletion option. Genetic distances at COI among individuals of the same stream insect MATERIALS AND METHODS Illiesia – http://illiesia.speciesfile.org Volume 11 – Number 2 – Page 9 Stark, B.P., B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Sandberg, B.A. Gill, C.J. Verdone, and A.B. Harrison. 2015. Sierraperla Jewett 1954 (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), distribution, egg morphology and description of a new species. Illiesia, 11(02):8-22. Available online: http://illiesia.speciesfile.org/papers/Illiesia11-02.pdf Figs. 1-6. Sierraperla cora eggs. 1. Anterior pole entire egg, Bendorf Spring, El Dorado Co., CA. 2. Detail of anterior pole, same location. 3. Anterior pole entire egg, Domingo Spring, Plumas Co., CA. 4. Detail of anterior pole, same location. 5. Anterior pole entire egg, Butte Creek, Butte Co., CA. 6. Detail of anterior pole, same location. Illiesia – http://illiesia.speciesfile.org Volume 11 – Number 2 – Page 10 Stark, B.P., B.C. Kondratieff, J.B. Sandberg, B.A. Gill, C.J. Verdone, and A.B. Harrison. 2015. Sierraperla Jewett 1954 (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae), distribution, egg morphology and description of a new species. Illiesia, 11(02):8-22. Available online: http://illiesia.speciesfile.org/papers/Illiesia11-02.pdf species are typically low (usually < 2-3%), whereas Young University, Provo, UT those among individuals of different species are CSUC C.P. Gillette Museum, Colorado State much higher (> 2-3% usually ~ 10% for congeneric University, Fort Collins, CO species; Hebert et al. 2003, Sweeney et al. 2011, JBSC John B. Sandberg Collection, Paradise, Zhou et al. 2009), thus allowing us to delimit CA putative species by examining levels of divergence JJLC Jonathan J. Lee Collection, Eureka, CA at COI among specimens. Mean intraspecific and RLBC Richard L. Bottorff Collection, South interspecific genetic distances were estimated for Lake Tahoe, CA all taxa. Egg samples were dissected from gravid RESULTS AND DISCUSSION females, cleaned with fine forceps and dental brushes, placed in an ultrasonic cleaner for 15-30 Sierraperla cora (Needham & Smith) seconds, removed to acetone and attached to (Figs. 1-16, 33) specimen stubs with double stick copper tape. Stubs were sputter coated with gold-palladium Peltoperla cora Needham & Smith 1916:86. Holotype ♀ and examined with an Amray 1810D scanning (Museum of Comparative Zoology), Reno, [Washoe electron microscope. Eighteen stubs with 5-12 eggs Co.], Nevada each were examined from 13 sites and more than Peltoperla cora: Needham & Claassen, 1925:172, in part 150 individual SEM images were collected for Peltoperla (Yoraperla) cora: Ricker, 1952:156 analysis. Egg diameter was estimated based on the Sierraperla cora: Jewett, 1954:170. Partial larval average of the length of two diameters taken description through the long axis and
Recommended publications
  • Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists PERLA NO. 28, 2010
    PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of The International Society of Plecopterologists Pteronarcella regularis (Hagen), Mt. Shasta City Park, California, USA. Photograph by Bill P. Stark PERLA NO. 28, 2010 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists Available on Request to the Managing Editor MANAGING EDITOR: Boris C. Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences And Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD: Richard W. Baumann Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 USA E-mail: [email protected] J. Manuel Tierno de Figueroa Dpto. de Biología Animal Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada 18071 Granada, SPAIN E-mail: [email protected] Kenneth W. Stewart Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203, USA E-mail: [email protected] Shigekazu Uchida Aichi Institute of Technology 1247 Yagusa Toyota 470-0392, JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] Peter Zwick Schwarzer Stock 9 D-36110 Schlitz, GERMANY E-mail: [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subscription policy……………………………………………………………………….4 Publication of the Proceedings of the International Joint Meeting on Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera 2008…………………………………….………………….………….…5 Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium………………………………………….6
    [Show full text]
  • User Manual Beta Sdam Aw.Pdf
    User Manual for a Beta Streamflow Duration Assessment Method for the Arid West of the United States Version 1.0 March 1, 2021 Prepared by Raphael Mazor1, Brian Topping2, Tracie-Lynn Nadeau2,3, Ken M. Fritz4, Julia Kelso5, Rachel Harrington6, Whitney Beck2, Kenneth McCune1, Heili Lowman1, Aaron Allen7, Robert Leidy8, James T. Robb9, and Gabrielle C. L. David10. 1 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Washington, D.C. 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 10. Portland, OR 4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati, OH 5 Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (ORISE) Fellow at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Washington, D.C. 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 8. Denver, CO 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–South Pacific Division. Los Angeles, CA 8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 9. San Francisco, CA. 9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – South Pacific Division. Sacramento, CA 10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Hanover, NH. Suggested citation: Mazor, R.D., Topping, B., Nadeau, T.-L., Fritz, K.M., Kelso, J., Harrington, R., Beck, W., McCune, K., Lowman, H., Allen, A., Leidy, R., Robb, J.T., and David, G.C.L. 2021. User Manuel for a Beta Streamflow Duration Assessment Method for the Arid West of the United States. Version 1.0. Document No. EPA- 800-5-21001 Cover images The top row shows the biological indicators included in the streamflow duration assessment method for the Arid West: number of hydrophytic plant species, such as seep monkey flowers; abundance of aquatic invertebrates, such as black fly larvae; evidence of mayfly, stonefly, and caddisfly taxa, such as a larva or pupal case of Dicosmoecus gilvipes (photo credit: California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Aquatic Bioassessment Lab); and algal cover on the streambed.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates
    State Wildlife Action Plan Update Appendix A-5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fact Sheets INVERTEBRATES Conservation Status and Concern Biology and Life History Distribution and Abundance Habitat Needs Stressors Conservation Actions Needed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Appendix A-5 SGCN Invertebrates – Fact Sheets Table of Contents What is Included in Appendix A-5 1 MILLIPEDE 2 LESCHI’S MILLIPEDE (Leschius mcallisteri)........................................................................................................... 2 MAYFLIES 4 MAYFLIES (Ephemeroptera) ................................................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia jenseni) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Siphlonurus autumnalis) .............................................................................................................. 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Hydrological Connectivity on the Benthos of a Large River (Lower Mississippi River, USA)
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-1-2018 Effects of Hydrological Connectivity on the Benthos of a Large River (Lower Mississippi River, USA) Audrey B. Harrison University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harrison, Audrey B., "Effects of Hydrological Connectivity on the Benthos of a Large River (Lower Mississippi River, USA)" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1352. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1352 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY ON THE BENTHOS OF A LARGE RIVER (LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, USA) A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biological Sciences The University of Mississippi by AUDREY B. HARRISON May 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Audrey B. Harrison All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The effects of hydrological connectivity between the Mississippi River main channel and adjacent secondary channel and floodplain habitats on macroinvertebrate community structure, water chemistry, and sediment makeup and chemistry are analyzed. In river-floodplain systems, connectivity between the main channel and the surrounding floodplain is critical in maintaining ecosystem processes. Floodplains comprise a variety of aquatic habitat types, including frequently connected secondary channels and oxbows, as well as rarely connected backwater lakes and pools. Herein, the effects of connectivity on riverine and floodplain biota, as well as the impacts of connectivity on the physiochemical makeup of both the water and sediments in secondary channels are examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions of Biodiversity
    Dimensions of Biodiversity NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CO-FUNDED BY 2010–2015 PROJECTS Introduction 4 Project Abstracts 2015 8 Project Updates 2014 30 Project Updates 2013 42 Project Updates 2012 56 Project Updates 2011 72 Project Updates 2010 88 FRONT COVER IMAGES A B f g h i k j C l m o n q p r D E IMAGE CREDIT THIS PAGE FRONT COVER a MBARI & d Steven Haddock f Steven Haddock k Steven Haddock o Carolyn Wessinger Peter Girguis e Carolyn g Erin Tripp l Lauren Schiebelhut p Steven Litaker b James Lendemer Wessinger h Marty Condon m Lawrence Smart q Sahand Pirbadian & c Matthew L. Lewis i Marty Condon n Verity Salmon Moh El-Naggar j Niklaus Grünwald r Marty Condon FIELD SITES Argentina France Singapore Australia French Guiana South Africa Bahamas French Polynesia Suriname Belize Germany Spain Bermuda Iceland Sweden Bolivia Japan Switzerland Brazil Madagascar Tahiti Canada Malaysia Taiwan China Mexico Thailand Colombia Norway Trinidad Costa Rica Palau United States Czech Republic Panama United Kingdom Dominican Peru Venezuela Republic Philippines Labrador Sea Ecuador Poland North Atlantic Finland Puerto Rico Ocean Russia North Pacific Ocean Saudi Arabia COLLABORATORS Argentina Finland Palau Australia France Panama Brazil Germany Peru Canada Guam Russia INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS Chile India South Africa China Brazil China Indonesia Sri Lanka (NSFC) (FAPESP) Colombia Japan Sweden Costa Rica Kenya United Denmark Malaysia Kingdom Ecuador Mexico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many NSF staff members, too numerous to We thank Mina Ta and Matthew Pepper for mention individually, assisted in the development their graphic design contribution to the abstract and implementation of the Dimensions of booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonefly (Plecoptera) Collecting at Sagehen Creek Field Station, Nevada County, California During the Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium
    Two new plecopterologists, Audrey Harrison and Kelly Nye (Mississippi College) sampling at Big Spring, a famous stonefly collecting site in California. If one looks closely, Sierraperla cora (Needham & Smith) and Soliperla sierra Stark are running about. Dr. R. Edward DeWalt, one of the hosts of NAPS-10 in 2012. Article: Stonefly (Plecoptera) Collecting at Sagehen Creek Field Station, Nevada County, California During the Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium Boris C. Kondratieff1, Jonathan J. Lee2 and Richard W. Baumann3 1Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 E-mail: [email protected]. 22337 15th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 E-mail: [email protected] 11 3Department of Biology, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 E-mail: [email protected] The Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium was held at the University of California’s Berkeley Sagehen Creek Field Station from 22 to 25 June 2009. The rather close proximity of Sagehen Creek to the actual meeting site (less than 100 m away) surely encouraged collecting of stoneflies. Sagehen Creek Field Station is located on the eastern slope of the northern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California, approximately 32 km north of Lake Tahoe. The Field Station occupies 183 ha. Sagehen Creek itself extends about 13 km from the headwater on Carpenter Ridge, east of the Sierra Crest to Stampede Reservoir on the Little Truckee River. The stream is fed by springs, fens, and other wetlands. The Sagehen Basin spans a significant precipitation gradient resulting in variation of stream flow. Sheldon and Jewett (1967) and Rademacher et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of California
    Typical Adult Stonefly and Cast Nymphal Skin (Courtesy of Dr. E. S. Ross, California Academy of Sciences) BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 6, NO. 6 THE STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF CALIFORNIA BY STANLEY G. JEWETT, JR (U.S. Bureau ofCommercia1 Fisheries, Portland, Oregon) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES l%O BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, P. D.Hurd, R. L. Usinger Volume 6, No. 6, pp. 125 - 178,41 figures in text, frontis. Submitted by Editors, February 10,1959 Issued June 17, 1960 Price $1.25 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSEY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF CALIFORNIA BY STANLEY G. JEWETT, JR. INTRODUCTION cipally vegetarian and the Setipalpia mostly car- nivorous - both the physical character of the Plecoptera is a relatively small order of aquatic aquatic environment and its biota govern the kinds insects with a world fauna of approximately 1,200 of stoneflies which occur in a habitat. Much valu- species. They require moving water for develop- able work could be done in determining the eco- ment of the nymphs, and for that reason the adults logical distribution of stoneflies in California, are usually found near streams. In some northern and the results could have application in fishery regions their early life is passed in cold lakes management and pollution studies. where the shore area is composed of gravel, but In general, the stonefly fauna of the western in most areas the immature stages are passed in cordilleran region is of similar aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 62 Number 4 Article 1 10-28-2002 Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington B. C. Kondratieff Colorado State University, Fort Collins Richard A. Lechleitner Mount Ranier National Park, Ashford, Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Kondratieff, B. C. and Lechleitner, Richard A. (2002) "Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 62 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol62/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 385–404 STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK, WASHINGTON B.C. Kondratieff1 and Richard A. Lechleitner2 ABSTRACT.—Mount Rainier National Park, with an area of 95,356 ha, is approximately one-third as large as the state of Rhode Island. The lowest point is 490 m in elevation in the southeastern corner near where the Ohanapecosh River crosses the southern boundary. Columbia Crest is the highest point at 4392 m. The entire park is a rugged landscape marked by the major topographical feature, Mount Rainier, comprising over 25,899 ha, almost one-third of the park. The park lies entirely west of the crest line of the Cascade Range. Most streams in the park originate on Mount Rainier; however, several large rivers meander through the park near its boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Prey for Riparian Associated Birds in Headwater Forests of the Oregon Coast Range ⇑ Joan C
    Forest Ecology and Management 285 (2012) 213–226 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Arthropod prey for riparian associated birds in headwater forests of the Oregon Coast Range ⇑ Joan C. Hagar a, , Judith Li b,1, Janel Sobota b,1, Stephanie Jenkins c,2 a US Geological Survey Forest & Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States b Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries & Wildlife, Nash Hall, Room #104, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3803, United States c Oregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States article info abstract Article history: Headwater riparian areas occupy a large proportion of the land base in Pacific Northwest forests, and thus Received 11 May 2012 are ecologically and economically important. Although a primary goal of management along small head- Received in revised form 16 August 2012 water streams is the protection of aquatic resources, streamside habitat also is important for many ter- Accepted 19 August 2012 restrial wildlife species. However, mechanisms underlying the riparian associations of some terrestrial Available online 21 September 2012 species have not been well studied, particularly for headwater drainages. We investigated the diets of and food availability for four bird species associated with riparian habitats in montane coastal forests Keywords: of western Oregon, USA. We examined variation in the availability of arthropod prey as a function of dis- Aquatic-terrestrial interface tance from stream. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that (1) emergent aquatic insects were a food Arthropod prey Forest birds source for insectivorous birds in headwater riparian areas, and (2) the abundances of aquatic and terres- Headwater streams trial arthropod prey did not differ between streamside and upland areas during the bird breeding season.
    [Show full text]
  • (Plecoptera : Capniidae). Western North American Naturalist 84:269-277
    (Plecoptera : Capniidae). Western North American Naturalist 84:269-277. 62:484-486. Stark, B.P., Oblad, B.R.; Gaufin, A.R. 1973. An annotated list of the Call, R. G., and R. W. Baumann. 2002. Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of southern stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Colorado, Part II. Entomological News Utah, with an updated checklist of Utah species. Monographs of the 84:301-305. Western North American Naturalist 1:65-89. Stewart, K.W.; Baumann, R.W.; Stark, B.P. 1974. The distribution and past Kondratieff, B. C., and R. W. Baumann. 2003. A review of the stoneflies of dispersal of southwestern United States Plecoptera. Transactions of Colorado with description of a new species of Capnia (Plecoptera: the American Entomological Society 99:507-546. Capniidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 128: 385-401. Stark, B.P.; Gaufin, A.R. 1974. The species of Calineuria and Doroneuria (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Great Basin Naturalist 34:83-93. Zenger, J. T. and R. W. Baumann. 2004. The Holarctic winter stonefly genus Isocapnia with an emphasis on the North American fauna Stark, B.P.; Gaufin, A.R. 1974. The genus Diploperla (Plecoptera: (Plecoptera: Capniidae). Monographs of the Western North Perlodidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 47:433- American Naturalist 2: 65-95. 436. Stark, B. P. and R. W. Baumann. 2004. The winter stonefly genus Cather, M.R.; Stark, B.P.; Gaufin, A.R. 1975. Records of stoneflies Paracapnia (Plecoptera) Capniidae). Monographs of the Western (Plecoptera) from Nevada. Great Basin Naturalist 35:49-50. North American Naturalist 2:96-108. Stark, B.P.; Wolff, T.A.; Gaufin, A.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae) at the Fernow Experimental Forest, Tucker County, West Virginia
    ECOLOGY OF PELTOPERLA ARCUATA AND TALLAPERLA MARIA (PLECOPTERA: PELTOPERLIDAE) AT THE FERNOW EXPERIMENTAL FOREST, TUCKER COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA BY KEVIN A. YOKUM 1, TI R. ANGRADI2, AND Dolato C. T,a' ABSTRACT We examined the abundance, life history, and production of the stoneflies Peltoperla arcuata and Tallaperla maria (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae) in four forested headwater streams at the Fernow Experimental Forest, Tucker County, West Virginia. Peltoperla arcuata was most abundant in the smallest watersheds (<100 ha), and was present at all sites. Tallaperla maria was most abundant in watersheds >200 hectares (ha), was restricted to sites with a base- -I flow alkalinity of >2 mg L CaCO 3, and was the dominant peltop- erlid only at sites with an alkalinity >15 mg L-1. We conclude that water chemistry overrides stream size as a determinant of species- specific distribution of Fernow peltoperlids. Both taxa had semi- voltine life cycles with an 18-month naiadal period following a 6-month egg diapause. Emergence was during May-July for both species. Peltoperla arcuata had about 15 instars; T. maria had about 14 instars. Peltoperlid production was highest (509 mg m-2 y-1) in a 128 ha watershed where only P. arcuata was collected; P. arcuata production was lowest (17 mg m-2 y-l) in a 4th order stream (1536 ha). Tallaperla maria production was highest (271 m-2 y-i) in a 257 ha watershed partially underlain by limestone. Production across streams was higher for P. arcuata (205 mg m-2 y-l) than for T. maria (91 mg m INTRODUCTION Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the family Peltoperlidae are "shred- der-detritivores" (Merritt and Cummins, 1996) which comminute 1Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Vir- ginia 25755 2Corresponding author, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Sta- tion, Parsons, West Virginia 26287 Manuscript received 9 October 1995.
    [Show full text]