DOCSLIB.ORG

Ifou Summer School 2009 | READER Metropolises in Transformation - the Randstad Challenge I N T E R N a T I O N a L Forum on Urbanism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ifou Summer School 2009 | READER Metropolises in Transformation - the Randstad Challenge I N T E R N a T I O N a L Forum on Urbanism IFou Summer School 2009 | READER Metropolises in Transformation - The Randstad Challenge I n t e r n a t i o n a l Forum on Urbanism www.ifou.org 1 2 Contents page Introduction of IFoU Summer School 2009 5 Organisation 6 Joint Design Studio 12 Schedule 28 Excursions 34 Venue 46 Accommodation 58 Practical Information 64 3 4 Introduction of IFoU Summer School 2009 The IFoU summer schools became an essential part in the annual agenda of the International Forum on Urbanism. Every year students and teachers from the participating universities are joining for a short period somewhere in the world, discussing new ideas, doing research, developing design concepts and – last but not least – making friends. Every year an increasing number of people become involved into this intensive exchange. After the Lugu Lake area in the west of China, Jakarta, Beijing and Hong Kong, The IFoU summer school in 2009 for the first time will take place in Delft, The Netherlands. Organized by the Delft University of Technology in collaboration with the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment the IFoU Summer School 2009 will focus on the transformation of a metropolitan region. As case will be used the Randstad Holland, a highly urbanized area in the west of The Netherlands that is covering all bigger cities of country, i.e. Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht. Compared on international level the different cities in the Randstad region are rather small. Even Amsterdam as the biggest city has less than 750.000 inhabitants. However, together are living in the Randstad region more than 6.5 million inhabitants, which makes it the fifth region in the European Union. The Randstad region is the economical powerhouse and the political and cultural center of the country. From the Randstad is depending the welfare and the competitiveness of The Netherlands. With this in mind the Dutch government wants to develop the Randstad region as a strong competitor on European level that is able to face the contest with other European regions. On the other hand, the Randstad – located mostly underneath sea level in the delta of two important European rivers – is threatened by specific environmental problems: rising sea level, river floods and water pollution are jeopardizing the continued existence of the region and are asking for strong planning interventions. The IFoU Summer School 2009 will face the double demand of competitive and sustainable development in different design tasks that are related to the Randstad region on multiple scales. I wish all participants an interesting and challenging stay in Delft, new experiences, new insights and friendships for lifetime. Prof. Jürgen Rosemann Chairman of IFoU 5 Organisation Initiators Participating Universities Responsible Coordinator Preparatory Team Mentors Guest Teachers Invited Critics Invited Lecturers Participants Organisation Initiated by International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) in collaboration with Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) Participating Universities Beijing University of Technology Chinese University of Hong Kong Delft University of Technology National University of Singapore Taiwan University Taipei Tsinghua University Beijing UPC Barcelona Responsible Prof. Jürgen Rosemann (Chairman, International Forum on Urbanism IFoU) Prof. Vincent Nadin (Chair, Spatial Planning and Strategy, TU Delft) Coordinator Diego Sepulveda WANG Chiu-yuan (Vivienne) Preparatory Team TU Delft HUI Xiaoxi (Sebastian) QU Lei CHIANG Che-sheng (Jason) Student Assistant Liu Arlene Lee Administration Kim Huijpen Representative of MinVROM Elien Wierenga 8 Mentors Beijing University of Technology GUO Siwei ZHAO Zhifeng Chinese University of Hong Kong Prof. Marc Aurel Schnabel Hendrik Tieben Delft University of Technology Frank van der Hoeven Akkelies van Nes Diego Sepulveda Stefan van der Spek John Westrik Tsinghua University LIU Jian Kristal Germaine Sanders Guest Teachers Delft University of Technology Willem Hermans Daan Zandbelt Province South Holland Marco van Steekelenburg University of Amsterdam Wendy Tan 9 Invited Critics Final Presentation Prof. Henco Bekkering (TU Delft) Prof. HSIA Chu-joe (Taiwan University) Walter Manshanden (TNO) Henk Ovink (VROM) Lex Pouw (Ymere) Prof. Jürgen Rosemann (TU Delft) Prof. Dirk Sijmons (TU Delft) Prof. Joost Schrijnen (TU Delft) Prof. TAN Zongbo (Tsinghua University) Midterm Review Beitske Boonstra (TNO) Alex Vollenbregt (TU Delft) Elien Wierenga (VROM) Gielijn Blom (Gemeente Den Haag) Invited Lecturers Prof. Henco Bekkering (TU Delft) Prof. Maurits de Hoog (TU Delft) Prof. HSIA Chu-joe (Taiwan University Taipei) Dr. LIU Jian (Tsinghua University) Prof. Han Meyer (TU Delft) Dr. Thorsten Schuetze (TU Delft) Marco van Steekelenburg (Province South Holland) Dr. Hendrik Tieben (Chinese University of Hong Kong) Ronald Walterman (www.ronaldwalterman.nl) Marijn van der Wagt (VROM) John Westrik (TU Delft) Elien Wierenga (VROM) Dr. ZHAO Zhifeng (Beijing University of Technology) Kathrin Sturm (VROM) 10 Participants Beijing University of Technology Tsinghua University Beijing 01. BAI Jie 26. GUO Yong 02. CHEN Xiwei 27. HUANG Zheng 03. GU Xiaojuan 28. HAO Shimeng 04. JIN Lei 29. KANG Huidan 05. LI Xuan 30. XIE Yingying 06. LI Zhong 31. GUO Lu 07. SUI Qianjing 08. SUN Yang UPC Barcelona 09. ZHANG Yan 32. Francesco Rossini 10. ZHU Lei 33. Sabrina Bentata Chinese University of Hong Kong 11. ZHAN Zhengxu Delft University of Technology 12. Ngan Yukkei 34. Sven van Oosten 13. YANG Lu 35. CHEN Mei yen 14. POON Ching Pong 36. TAN Gaofei 37. Mia Jessica Thio National University of Singapore 38. LEE Jihye 15. WANG Kai 39. Edwin Strik 16. LEE Ai Ling 40. Danique Zimmerman 17. CHEN Yuxun 41. FANG Zheng 42. WONG Raymond Taiwan University Taipei 43. Feile Cao 18. LIN Yiling 44. Ardavan Khorsand 19. YEH Szu-Yu 45. Filippo Abrami 20. LIN Shu-Chen 21. HSU Mei-Ling 22. TSENG Hui-jiun 23. YU Hsin-ko 24. CHEN De-Jung 25. SUNG Yin-Hsuan 11 source: structuurvisie randstad 2040 Joint Design Studio General Introduction Aims Course codes Fundaments Course Methodology Maps and Reader Design Themes theme 1. Randstad Synergy theme 2. Twin city theme 3. Recreation of the Green Heart theme 4. Den Haag Sea Front theme 5. Kop van Feijenoord General Introduction As part of the IFOU (international forum of Urbanism) activities on 2009, the yearly summer course is open for IFOU partners, this year it will be held in The Netherlands, hosted by TU Delft. In line with the general goals of the Forum and focus on the up-to-date urban debate (Randstad Vision 2040, Randstad Urgent program, Twin city: Almere-Amsterdam), the IFoU Summer School 2009 theme will tackle the Dutch government call who wishes that the highly urbanized region in the west of the country - the Randstad - to develop into a sustainable and competitive European top region. The IFoU invitation is to join a whole international team of master students of architecture and urbanism as well as urban related practitioners and a team of senior researchers to explore the dimension of regional planning, regional competitiveness and entrepreneurial approaches for planning and development, to explore and define different approaches towards the definition of a regional vision to articulate the Randstad goal. The program team has defined a series of lectures and encounters with the main regional actors from Ministries to social base organizations. As well as a series of documents and organize data to support the course requirements and to give a strong base for the participants to face the “Randstad Challenge”. Aims • Analysing the regional development paradigm in Europe. • Understanding the role and scope of the different urban actors in a concerted process of planning by consensus. • Reviewing the different intervention scales on regional planning, • Reviewing its planning framework and the links between urban actors towards sustainable development. • Exploring some regional competitiveness criteria by organizing strategic interventions. Course Codes • Elaborating a decision making base to define a vision for regional strategic planning. • Introducing urban design as a testing tool for strategic planning. • Elaborating a solution at the Randstad level to improve collaboration between cities and balanced development on the urban regional scale. 14 Fundaments • The recognition of the European spatial planning perspective and the role of preferential developing regions. • Understanding the societal development and the shift towards a more knowledge bases economy and its possible link into a more green economy. • The link to the spatial organization of the region, considering mix of functions and innovation strategies. • Revealing the location demands of services enterprises and other innovative functions with the main existing centralities and its regional trends. • Evaluating the policies that secure the competitiveness of the different city component of the region through design intervention. Course Methodology The method used in this studio will consists of three components. The Planning Component The participants will be introduced to the concrete actors involved with the Randstad vision 2040, including its components, main challenges and active links. The participants organized in groups will choose a main set of its challenges/goals and define a coherent development strategy within the previous chosen regional competitive approach framework. The Strategic Planning Approaches The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Op Het Spoor Van De Gouwe Profielwerkstuk Over Het Onderzoek Naar De Loop Van De Rivier De Gouwe in De Goudse Binnenstad Rond 1200
    COORNHERT GYMNASIUM GOUDA Op het spoor van de Gouwe Profielwerkstuk over het onderzoek naar de loop van de rivier de Gouwe in de Goudse binnenstad rond 1200. Erik‐Jan Dros, Jasper Schakel, Erik Kroon 15‐02‐2011 D.m.v. een bronnenonderzoek proberen ondergetekenden de loop van de Gouwe en mogelijk de aard van de verschillende veenlagen in de binnenstad vast te stellen. Pagina 2 van 72 Inhoudsopgave Doel van het onderzoek..……………………………………………………….. 4 Inleiding………………………………………………………………………… 4 Conclusie………………………………………………………………………... 5 Deel I: Het bronnenonderzoek……………………………….……….………. 11 Theorie vooraf…………………………………………………………… 12 Hypothese……………………………………………………….………. 13 Werkwijze……………………………………………………….………. 14 Resultaten……………………………………………………………….. 14 Bouwwerken……………………………………………………. 15 Haven……………………………………………………. 15 Donkere sluis…………………………………………….. 16 St. Janskerk……………………………………………… 17 Dubbele Buurt…………………………………………… 19 Motte……………………………………………………. 20 Verkaveling……………………………………………………… 21 Toponiemen……………………………………………………… 23 Deelconclusie.…………………………………………………………… 25 Discussie………………………………………………………………… 26 Deel II: De boormonsteranalyse……………………………………………… 27 Doel van de proef…..……………………………………………………. 28 Inleiding………….…………………………………………………….... 28 Overzicht van de monsters…….……………………………….... 28 Benodigdheden…………………………………………………………. 28 Proefopstelling…………………………………………………... 29 Werkwijze………………………………………………………………. 30 Resultaten……………………………………………………………….. 31 Deelconclusie…………………………………………………………….. 37 Discussie…………………………………………………………………. 38 Deel III: Analyse veensoorten in boormonsters..………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Pauzes 15 Minuten
    STAANDE MAST ROUTE VAARROUTE NOORDZEEKANAAL VIA HAARLEM - DORDRECHT BRUGBEDIENING ZATERDAG 16 APRIL - 16 OKT 2019 WWW.ALLESOVERVAREN.NL WA NR BRUG/SLUIS TELEFOON TER HOOGTE VAN VAARWATER / ROEPNAAM MARIFOON KAN 5 6 7 6 8 7 98 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 1617 1817 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 23 22 24 23 24 BLZ NR 4 1 BRUG IN BUITENHUIZEN 393 0255565762 SPAARNDAM / SPAARNWOUDE NOORDZEEKANAAL - ZIJKANAAL 18 C 2 BRUG IN RIJKSWEG 9 max. 7 bft 393 0255565150 SPAARNDAM / SPAARNWOUDE ZIJKANAAL C BLAUWE GOLF T/M KAAG 30 15 00 3 SLUIS EN BRUG SPAARNDAM (sluisgeld) 392 0235372129 SPAARNDAM ZIJKANAAL C 18 30 30 4 SCHOTERBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 STAD IN HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN 5 WAARDERBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN PRINSENBRUG, BETALEN BIJ 6 161 0235310904 TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 HAVENKANTOOR HAARLEM SPAARNE, HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN 7 SPOORBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN 8 CATHARIJNEBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN 9 GRAVESTESTENBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN 10 MELKBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 11 LANGEBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Van Tekst
    Het leeven en eenige bysondere voorvallen Passchier de Fyne bron Passchier de Fyne, Het leeven en eenige bysondere voorvallen. Vrederijk-Stad, z.j. [ca. 1665] Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/fyne001leev01_01/colofon.htm © 2009 dbnl *1r Voorreden Van den schrijver. Goethartige Leeser, 't VErwondert my niet, dat gy hier met verwonderinge het Leeven van Passchier de Fijne, in druk siet; gy en soudt het voorseker nooit gesien hebben, ten zy ik door verscheyde goede Vrinden daer toe op verscheyde tijden, en bysonder, nu my door ouderdom, het gesicht geheel begint te begeeven, zeer ernstelikke vermaent en aangeport ware geweest, niet om datse in my so veel ge- Passchier de Fyne, Het leeven en eenige bysondere voorvallen *1v leertheyt, ofte een aengenaemen stijl in 't schrijven oordeelden te weesen: Maer om dat sy wisten, dat my in dese leste Onchristelijjke Vervolginge der Calvinisten (die in den Jare 1618. tot Dordrecht gebroet, ende door zeer veele bittere en liefdeloose Requesten, van de Contraremonstrantsche Predikanten gevoet is) veele notabele dingen wedervaren zijn, waer van men de gedachtenisse onder de nakomelingen niet behoorde te vergeten. Ik begon dan den raet der voorsz, goede Vrienden in bedenken te nemen, te meer, also ik, met eenige Contraremonstrants gesinde Luyden spreekende hoorde: datse gants onweetende scheenen te weesen, hoe dat men hier in dit onse Vrye Neder- Passchier de Fyne, Het leeven en eenige bysondere voorvallen *2r lant de Luyden hadde van hare goederen berooft, verscheyden Huysen geplundert, eenige dootgeschooten, andere gevangen, &c. Die seyden wel gehoort te hebben, dat 'er eenige gevangen en eenige gedoot waren geweest, maer meinden, dat die zulkx alles hadden moeten lyden om hare quade voornemens tegens den Persoon van de Prinse van Orangje, ende den goeden Staet deser Landen, ende en konden noch niet geloven, dat men van de genaemde zuyvere Gereformeerde Kerke so wreede Vervolginge, alleene om het hooren, of doen van Predikatie, ofte om het Herbergen, ofte het onderhouden der.
    [Show full text]
  • Staande Mast Route Noordzeekanaal Via Haarlem
    STAANDE MAST ROUTE NOORDZEEKANAAL VIA HAARLEM - DORDRECHT BRUGBEDIENING ZONDAG TOT 16 OKT 2020 WWW.ALLESOVERVAREN.NL WA NR BRUG/SLUIS TELEFOON TER HOOGTE VAN VAARWATER / ROEPNAAM MARIFOON KAN 5 6 7 86 7 9 8 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 1615 16 17 17 18 18 19 1920 20 2121 22 22 23 24 23 24 BLZ NR 4 1 BRUG IN BUITENHUIZEN 408 0255565762 SPAARNDAM/SPAARNWOUDE NOORDZEEKANAAL - ZIJKANAAL C 18 2 BRUG IN RIJKSWEG 9 max. 7 bft 407 0255565150 SPAARNDAM/SPAARNWOUDE ZIJKANAAL C BLAUWE GOLF T/M KAAG 30 15 00 3 SLUIS EN BRUG SPAARNDAM (sluisgeld) 407 0235372129 SPAARNDAM ZIJKANAAL C 18 30 30 4 SCHOTERBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 STAD IN 5 WAARDERBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 6 PRINSENBRUG, BETALEN HAVENKANTOOR 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 7 SPOORBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 21/51 21/5121/5121/51 21/51 21/5121/5121/5121/5121/51 21/5121/51 21/51 8 CATHARIJNEBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 9 GRAVESTESTENBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 10 MELKBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 11 LANGEBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 12 BUITENRUSTBRUG 161 0235310904 HAARLEM TEL IS NIET VOOR BRUGGEN SPAARNE, HAVENDIENST HAARLEM 18 13 SCHOUWBROEKERBRUG
    [Show full text]
  • Verslag Werkbijeenkomsten December 2019 Inhoud
    Beter Bereikbaar Gouwe Verslag werkbijeenkomsten december 2019 Inhoud Inleiding 3 Interview | met achtergrondinformatie 4 Presentatie | eerste indruk van de effecten 8 Samenvatting| van de tafel Wegen 12 Samenvatting | van de tafel Varen 14 Samenvatting | van de tafel Fiets en Openbaar vervoer 17 Samenvatting | van de tafel Omgevingsmanagement 18 Stappenplan | en hoe nu verder 22 In dit verslag zijn teksten opgenomen zoals deze letterlijk tijdens de bijeen­ komsten zijn genoteerd. Het programmateam heeft hier geen conclusies, waardeoordeel of verwachtingen aan verbonden. Als in dit verslag wordt gesproken over ‘we’ dan wordt bedoeld de samenwerkende partners in Beter Bereikbaar Gouwe. 2 | - Verslag werkbijeenkomsten december 2019 - Inleiding In dit verslag vindt u de samenvatting van de werkbijeenkomsten die in december 2019 zijn gehouden. Deze bijeenkomsten vonden plaats bij Gasterij Vergeer in Reeuwijk-Dorp, Flora in Boskoop en De Juf- frouw in Hazerswoude-Dorp. Tijdens deze sessies hebben wij u een eerste indruk gegeven van de effecten van 26 maatregelen en zijn we met elkaar aan tafels in gesprek gegaan over deze maatregelen. Dit verslag is een globale samenvatting van alle bijeenkomsten bij elkaar. Het komende half jaar worden maatregelen verder onderzocht en wordt een samenhangend pakket maatregelen ontwikkeld. Algemene indruk Wie waren er? De bijeenkomsten waren goed bezocht. Na behoorlijke De werkbijeenkomsten telden in totaal 225 belangstel- ophef en commotie in juli 2019 verliepen deze werkbij- lenden. Veel aanwezigen kwamen namens bedrijven, eenkomsten in een opbouwende sfeer. We kregen vaak belangenorganisaties en bewonersgroepen, zoals te horen dat de presentatie helder was en het proces OPBR, VORT, RvHID, BLN Schuttevaer, Greenport, duidelijk. De aanwezigen stelden zich positief, kritisch en Bedrijven Boskoop Oost, Toerzeilers, VNO-NCW zeer betrokken op.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalty and Secret Intelligence: Anglo–Dutch Cooperation During World War II
    Politics and Governance (ISSN: 2183–2463) 2018, Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 159–167 DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i4.1556 Article Loyalty and Secret Intelligence: Anglo–Dutch Cooperation during World War II Eleni Braat Department of History and Art History, Utrecht University, 3512 BS Utrecht, The Netherlands; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 25 April 2018 | Accepted: 21 June 2018 | Published: 28 December 2018 Abstract Secrecy and informal organisation produce, sustain, and reinforce feelings of loyalty within intelligence and security ser- vices. This article demonstrates that loyalty is needed for cooperation between intelligence partners as well as within and between services. Under many circumstances, loyalty plays a larger role in the level of internal and external collaboration than formal work processes along hierarchical lines. These findings are empirically based on the case study of Anglo–Dutch intelligence cooperation during World War II. By demonstrating that ‘loyalty’ critically affects the work of intelligence com- munities, this article contributes to current and future research that integrates history, intelligence studies, and research on emotions. Keywords emotions; history; informal organization; intelligence; international relations; loyalty; secrecy; World War II Issue This article is part of the issue “Interdisciplinary Approaches to Studying Emotions within Politics and International Rela- tions”, edited by Alex Prior (University of Leeds, UK) and Yuri van Hoef (Utrecht University, The Netherlands). © 2018 by the author; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion 4.0 International License (CC BY). 1. Introduction of intelligence primarily focus on the (at times spectacu- lar) operational history of services, putting adventurous Secret intelligence is the missing dimension in the his- agents and their handlers in the limelight, who seem to tory of international relations, as Christopher Andrew act in a strategic and calculated manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Recommendation of the Scheveningen Group Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the North Sea
    Ref. Ares(2018)3458869Ares(2019)2387732 - 29/06/201804/04/2019 Joint Recommendation of the Scheveningen Group Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the North Sea 1. Background One of the main elements of the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) applying from 1 January 2014 is the gradual introduction of landing obligations for all catches taken from stocks subject to catch limits. To this end, Regulation (EU) no. 1380/2013 (the “Basic Regulation”) sets out the timeframes for the relevant fisheries as well as provisions for possible exemptions. At the same time this regulation defines the general framework for regional cooperation on conservation measures. In Article 15(6) of Regulation (EU) no. 1380/2013 the Commission is empowered to adopt Delegated Acts in accordance with Article 18 of that Regulation concerning specific provisions regarding fisheries or species covered by the landing obligation, exemptions for high survivability and de minimis, provisions, on the documentation of catches and the fixing of minimum conservation reference sizes. According to Article 18 of the Basic Regulation Member States having a direct management interest may submit joint recommendation (JR) for discard plans. These are to contain details of the implementation of the landing obligation. Upon agreeing a JR the Member States may propose to the Commission to translate it into a delegated act. Where no measures have been adopted for the purpose of specifying the de minimis exemption the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts containing only provisions for de minimis exemptions. At the time of submitting this JR to the Commission a multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea was in the final stage of its adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Section of the Mast-Up Route and Alternative Route Over the Kagerplassen Lakes
    Western section of the Mast-Up Route and alternative route over the Kagerplassen lakes 52 37 Hillegommerbrug 595 51 38 Bennebroekerbrug 594 50 39 Cruquiusbrug 593 49 40 Schouwbroekerbrug 592 41 Haarlem, Buitenrustbrug 590 48 42 Haarlem, Langebrug 589 46 43 Haarlem, Melkbrug 588 45 47 44 Haarlem, Gravenstenenbrug 587 43 44 45 Haarlem, Cathanijnebrug 586 42 46 Haarlem, Spoorbrug 585a 41 51 Heemstede HAARLEM 47 Haarlem, Prinsenbrug 585 48 50Haarlem, Waarderbrug 584 40 49 Haarlem, Schoterbrug 583a 50 Spaarndam, Rijnlandsluis 583 39 48 51 Brug Zijkanaal C (A9) 582 52 BuitenhuizerbrugAMSTERDAM 581 Cruquius The numbers after the bridges refer to the ANWB Water Alma- 46 nac/App and the ANWB Navigation Charts (Waterkaarten) Bennebroek 45 47 25 38 43 44 Nieuwe Meer 42 41 Westelijke RingvaartHeemstede van de HAARLEM Hillegom Haarlemmermeerpolder Amstelveen 37 AMSTERDAM Cruquius Lisse Bennebroek 25 Nieuwe Meer Aalsmeer Westeinder Sassenheim plassen Hillegom Amstelveen Overview of the northern part of the western section of the Mast-Up Route with passage through Haarlem Kager Kaag Leimuiden plassen 26 Koudekerk aan de Rijn, Koudekerksebrug 604 Oude Wetering36 27 Fietsbrug (A4) 603 28 Leiderdorpse brug 602 Roelofarendsveen Lisse Braassemer35 29 Leiden, Spanjaardbrug 601 meer 30 Zijlbrug 600 de Zijl 31 Oude Wetering, WeteringsebrugAalsmeer 599b 30 Zuidelijke Ringvaart van32 deZuidelijke Ringvaart, Meerbrug 599a 29 Leiderdorp Haarlemmermeerpolder33 Spoorbrug Ringvaart 599 Sassenheim 34 Westeinder LEIDEN Woubrugge 34 Kaagbrug (A44) 598 28 plassen 27 Heimans-
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Coast - Toestand Van De Kust - Case Study: South Holland
    The state of the coast - Toestand van de kust - Case study: South Holland The state of the coast - Toestand van de kust - Case study: South Holland Alessio Giardino Giorgio Santinelli 1206171-003 © Deltares, 2013 27 June 2013, final Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Objectives 3 3 Assumptions 5 4 Study area: morphology, anthropogenic and natural forcing 9 4.1 Morphological characterization of the study area 9 4.2 Anthropogenic forcing 14 4.2.1 Nourishment policies over the years 14 4.2.2 Dune management in the years 15 4.2.3 Other man-made structures 19 4.3 Natural forcing 21 4.3.1 Meteorological forcing 21 4.3.2 Climatological and geological forcing 21 5 Morphological development of the South Holland coast 23 5.1 Short term safety 23 5.1.1 Probability of breaching and erosion length 23 5.1.2 Analysis 24 5.2 Medium term safety 29 5.2.1 MKL, TKL and BKL 29 5.2.2 Analysis 29 5.3 Long term safety 35 5.3.1 Sediment volumes 35 5.3.2 Analysis 36 5.4 Nature and recreation 43 5.4.1 Dune foot, dry and wet beach 43 5.4.2 Analysis of beach width at mean low water (wet + dry beach) 43 5.4.3 Analysis of dune foot 46 6 Relations between nourishment volumes and indicators 51 6.1 Introduction 51 6.2 Relations between nourishment volumes and indicators 51 6.2.1 Nourishment volume and probability of failure 51 6.2.2 Nourishment volume and MKL 52 6.2.3 Nourishment volume and dune foot position 54 6.3 Relations between indicators 55 6.3.1 MKL and probability of breaching 55 6.3.2 Dune foot and probability of breaching 56 7 Effects of storms 57 7.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Mesdag-Van Houten, Sientje
    Sientje Mesdag-van Houten, Foral Still Life Saint-Josse-ten-Noode 1847 – 1943 Brussels oil on panel 16 ¾ by 14 ¾ inches (43 by 37.5 cm.) signed lower right: ‘S M.vH’ provenance: Brabantse KunstJaleriJ, Oirshot, The Netherlands; Private collection, The Netherlands note: SientJe van Houten married Hendrik Willem Mesdag in April 1856 and seven years later in 1863 their only child, Klaas was born. In 1864, her father died and left her a substantial inheritance. This change in her financial situation allowed Hendrik to leave his father’s bank where he had been working for siXteen years and concentrate on his painting and eventually become a professional artist. SientJe accompanied her husband when he went to Brussels to study under Willem Roelofs. Their house in Rue Van de Weyer was often the focal point for Dutch and Belgian painters, and it could well have been the conversations on art at these soirées that stimulated SientJe’s mind and enhanced her artistic talent. She, like her husband, not only received instruction from Roelofs but also from Hendrik’s cousin the professional artist, Lawrence Alma-Tadema. SientJe van Houten accompanied her husband when he spent the summer of 1866 at the Oosterbeek artist colony and again in the summer of 1868 on the island of Nordeney where she, like Hendrik, spent time painting and sketching seascapes. The couple moved to The Hague in 1869, where they lived in a house on Anna Paulownastraat and later in a house on Laan van Meerdervoort. Her husband, who wanted to concentrate on seascapes, later hired a studio room facing the sea at the Villa Elba in Scheveningen where he and Sientje would spend hours painting and sketching.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Deliverable: Diagnosis Report Gouda Wastewater Monitoring Network the Netherlands
    Title Deliverable: Diagnosis Report Gouda Wastewater Monitoring Network The Netherlands DC-Project code: DC Project Title: Integraal Stedelijk Waterbeheer CT06.20 DC-Work package code DC Work Package Title: Integrale pilot: Hoogwaterstad CT06.24.11 Principal Author 1: Carlos Vélez Institute: Principal Author 2: Ioana Popescu Institute: Contributor 1: Arnold Lobbrecht Institute Contributor 2: Alberto Galvis Institute Report Type: Final report Report Status: Definitief Number of pages: 45 Number of Annexes: Keywords (3-8): Urban Wastewater Systems, water quantity, water quality, advanced micorprocessors, hydroinformatics tools Abstract: Urban pollution managers are being forced to optimize the control of Urban Wastewater Systems (UWwS) in order to deal with more pressure and new criteria for performance. Furthermore, one of the main causes of the deficient control of the UWwSs is the lack of data in each subsystem and the lack of coordination within institutions to share the information and take decisions based on it. Even though, there are sensors available for water quantity and water quality, advanced microprocessors and hydroinformatics tools for information management, the lack of information is still one of the causes of the poor control of UWwSs. One way to tackle these problems is by defining clear and documented guide lines that allow the education institutions to fill the gab in the transfer of knowledge and technology to the practitioners in charge of design, operate and manage the UWwSs. Institute Publication-number (optional):
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Recommendation of the Scheveningen Group Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the North Sea
    Joint Recommendation of the Scheveningen Group Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the North Sea 1. Background One of the main elements of the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) applying from 1 January 2014 is the gradual introduction of landing obligations for all catches taken from stocks subject to catch limits. To this end, Regulation (EU) no. 1380/2013 (the “Basic Regulation”) sets out the timeframes for the relevant fisheries as well as provisions for possible exemptions. At the same time this regulation defines the general framework for regional cooperation on conservation measures. Member States may cooperate in accordance with Article 18 in drawing up joint recommendations (JR) for “discard plans”. These are to contain details of the implementation of the landing obligation, and may be adopted on a temporary basis for no more than three years, where no multiannual plan has been adopted for the fishery in question. Upon agreeing a JR the Member States may propose them to the Commission for them to be adopted as a delegated act. If Member States cannot reach agreement on a JR that is in line with the objectives of the CFP then the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts for discard plans containing only provisions for de minimis exemptions. 2.1. Scheveningen High-Level Group Following Article 18 of the Basic Regulation, the Fisheries Directors of the North Sea Member States cooperating in the Scheveningen Group since 2004 established a High Level Group (HLG) in December 2013 and agreed on a Memorandum of Understanding setting out the principles and working methods of the Group.
    [Show full text]