DOCSLIB.ORG

Torit, Eastern Equatoria, South Sudan Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Torit, Eastern Equatoria, South Sudan Date CES-SOUTH SUDAN Location : Torit, Eastern Equatoria, South Sudan Date : 05 November, 2014 Chari : Suvash Acharya Agenda : 1. Welcome / Introductions 2. Cluster Objectives / SPR-2015 process update / IPC 3. Presentation on county level information: -Planned vs actual comparison & graphs / Maps of FSL activities in EES -Review of gaps per county and response discussion 4. Access constraints during project implementation (sharing from Partners) 4. AOB Welcome / Introduction: Clarify the purpose of the monthly state level FSLC meeting to the participants. The purpose of the meeting is to strengthen coordination mechanism amongst the national and international FSLC actors, facilitate effective sharing of information, promote partnerships and inclusiveness among the FSLC actors and other clusters working in the EES. Cluster Objectives / SPR-2015 process update / IPC: The FSLC cluster objectives were shared in the meeting by linking existing FSLC activities with the three cluster objectives and how it contribute to achieve the cluster outcomes. Highlighted on the inputs provided by the different Agencies i.e. Access to Food and Community Asset Creation and Livelihoods inputs provision SPR–2015 overall process and its current status i.e. submission of Cluster Response Plan along with its cluster strategy, M&E Frame work with its indicators etc; Currently FSLC is reviewing the proposals received form the Cluster Members and Implementing Partners and shared that FSL is going to request them to upload the proposal on OPS site by 06/Nov/2014. Briefly shared on IPC Sept/2014 outcomes, particularly analysis of EES livelihoods phase classification and population breakdown by different phases of IPC and maps were shared in the meeting; Presentation on county level INFO: (target vs actual and gaps per county) 1 CES-SOUTH SUDAN Shared on Cluster CRP Targets and Response Priority set for EES for 2014 which are 56, 244 beneficiaries for Improved Access to Food and 246,512 beneficiaries for Livelihoods Investment. Distribution of the food for the month of Sept/14 has reached above 80% in most of the counties under Access Increase to food activity. However, because of logistic challenges due to bad road conditions by heavy rains in the state, could not reach the target in some counties i.e. Budi, Magwi, Lopa and Kapoeta North, which remained below 80%. Except in Ikwoto county, all the counties in EES have reached target in the month of Sept/14, under Livelihoods Investment Intervention; Access constraints during project implementation (as reported by partners): ARD: Food commodities were distributed to 40,789 targeted beneficiaries in 25 Payams under 6 Counties, of Kapoeta Eat, Kapoeta south, Kapoeta North, Lafon, Ikotos and Torits in EES; Under BSFP progrtamme, 1,123 children (6-59 months) were reached in 12 Payams of 2 Counties of Kapoeta East and Kapoeta South 2,300 Participants were involved in the programme (16,100) target beneficiaries reached) in 8 payams of 3 counties i.e. Kapoeta East, KApoeta South and Kapoeta North. Challenges: Road access constraint during rainy season; Delay in delivery by transporters and lack of tools Problem in communication as in the most of the project areas, there is not telephone network World Concern: World Concern in behalf of FAO distribution supplementary seeds to the five Payams of Arihilo, Burgilo, Murguna, Kurumi and Pacidi in Lopa County. So far about 31,200 Kg of seeds of maize, Cowpeas and Sorghum is distributed to 31,200 beneficiaries. About 43.365 MT of food have been distributed for more than 735 participants (targeting 5,145 beneficiaries) against the Agriculture Farms, in Lojo, Lohobohobo, Isiwanb and Belle and the school rehabilitation programme in Mura_Lopit and Bulle and the roads rehabilitation in Imhejek, Longiro, Bulle and Arilo in Lopa county; Constraints: -Lack of warehouses for storage for Seeds; -Poor market linkages to sell the products and transportation problem; CDSS: 2 CES-SOUTH SUDAN - Under Asset Creation activity in Budi County, CDSS cleared 4.7 km bush, 2 spots blocked road rehabilitation affected by landslides; - 22 KM of the targeted 26 KM road rehabilitation has been already rehabilitated in Budi county and food distribution has been taken place partially as per the recommendation of M&E progress report; - In the month of October, livestock were treated under the programme of Livelihoods Investments in Budi county; Challenges: Since the project area is in the remote part of Budi and road access and landslides are the main challenges; In adequate tools with the farmers; AFAGA: In the month of October, AFAGA is continuing it Food for two Assets Creating activities in Magwi county and have so far distributed food two times; From nest week, AFAGA will be supporting to the farmers on harvesting Sorghum; Planning for a post-production assessment once the farmers harvest the crops of this season; Challenges: Road cut off is one the main challenges for AFAGA to access and deliver the food a non-food to the target area; CARITAS SWISS: Under Torit county, in Lmurok Payam and Kudo Payam, a total of 65 farmers planted assorted crops seeds 34 famers have planted their assorted crop seeds; The three days joint monitoring exercise was carried out to in Gunyoro, Ifoho, Lofiri and Hutiala Bomas of Imurok and Kudo Payams aiming to monitor the production of seeds in the area. Constraints: - Insecurity affected access to and from target locations especially Chahari Payam in Ikwoto County - Bad roads hampered distribution process AVSI: AVSI distributed 27.61 MT of food reaching 4, 674 beneficiaries and this has increased attendance in the target schools; 7 schools and one hospital (St. Theresa Isohe) are benefiting from WFP distribution in Ikotos County of EES; Challenges: - Difficult accessibility of many locations in Ikotos County during the raining season - Poor understanding of the stocking record system from the school Plan International: A total of 35,261 IDPs residing in Melijo IDP camps of Nimule payam and 4,300 severely food insecure community in Kimatong, Napak and Losite payams of Ikwotos and Budi Counties are receiving assorted GFD from Plan International regularly; A total of 5, 957 pupils from Primary Schools in EES are benefiting from Food for Education activity and deworming activity; 3 CES-SOUTH SUDAN A total of 91 teachers, 13 PTAs members, 13 community leaders and 520 pupils were trained on vegetable gardening and nutrition. These participants were from 13 schools. 1,839 moderately food insecure HH are being supported through FFA projects in 5 payams of torit and Magwi county; WFP: To respond the concern raised by the IPs on delayed in FLA agreement, WFP clarified in the meeting that FLA agreements process was bit delayed last year as most of the partners working in the state were dispersed due to conflict. That took some times to gain the momentum of working environment in the state. WFP SO, Torit informed to all the partners to attend a “two-day workshop” on “Community Need Identification and Prioritization” from 26-27/Nov/2014 in Torit. AOB FSL Cluster has received a total 9 proposals from the Implementing Partners for EES for CRP-2015. These proposals are under review currently and once it is finalized will be informed to the concern partners; Attendance of the Meeting: SN Name Position/title Org. Telephone E-mail 1 Daniel kanyaru Program Assistant ARD 0955418119 [email protected] 2 Elizeous Izama Surur Project Co-ordinatror AFAGA 0955080377 [email protected] 3 Mwesigye Joram Head of Food Security Caritas 0954359574 [email protected] 4 David Wachira H.of programes ARD 0955070768 [email protected] 5 Ghebrehiwet Hailit ERC Plan 0956073517 [email protected] 6 Graham Juma Field Coordinator Plan 0955058896 [email protected] 7 Demmelash Adera Emrg. Resp. Manager Plan [email protected] 8 Sisto Otho Field Monitor Plan int. 0956286274 [email protected] 9 Voya James M&E CDSS 0955226967 [email protected] 10 Dagostino Francesco Area Team Leader AVSI 095484017 [email protected] 11 Moses Opolot Programme Manager AFH 0956488097 [email protected] 12 Hillary Taban Project Manager FAO 0922001683 [email protected] World [email protected] or 13 Barsabas Efuk Gallas Program Manager Concern 0956928583 [email protected] 14 Maduok Akot HSO, EES WFP 0922465449 [email protected] 15. Suvash Acharya FSLC A. Coordinator FSLC 0912300471 [email protected] 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda's Army in Sudan
    Mareike Schomerus “They forget what they came for”: Uganda's army in Sudan Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Schomerus, Mareike (2012) “They forget what they came for”: Uganda's army in Sudan. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 6 (1). pp. 124-153. ISSN 1753-1055 DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2012.664707 © 2012 Taylor and Francis This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43407/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. ‘‘They forget what they came for’’: Uganda’s army in Sudan Mareike Schomerus Uganda’s army, the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF), has been operating on Sudanese territory since the late 1990s. From 2002 to 2006, a bilateral agreement between the governments in Khartoum and Kampala gave the Ugandan soldiers permission to conduct military operations in Southern Sudan to eliminate the Ugandan rebel Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).
    [Show full text]
  • Symptoms and Causes: Insecurity and Underdevelopment in Eastern
    sudanHuman Security Baseline Assessment issue brief Small Arms Survey Number 16 April 2010 Symptoms and causes Insecurity and underdevelopment in Eastern Equatoria astern Equatoria state (EES) is The survey was supplemented by qual- 24,789 (± 965) households in the one of the most volatile and itative interviews and focus group three counties contain at least one E conflict-prone states in South- discussions with key stakeholders in firearm. ern Sudan. An epicentre of the civil EES and Juba in January 2010. Respondents cited traditional lead- war (1983–2005), EES saw intense Key findings include: ers (clan elders and village chiefs) fighting between the Sudanese Armed as the primary security providers Across the entire sample, respond- Forces (SAF) and the Sudan People’s in their areas (90 per cent), followed ents ranked education and access Liberation Army (SPLA), as well by neighbours (48 per cent) and reli- to adequate health care as their numerous armed groups supported gious leaders (38 per cent). Police most pressing concerns, followed by both sides, leaving behind a legacy presence was only cited by 27 per by clean water. Food was also a top of landmines and unexploded ordnance, cent of respondents and the SPLA concern in Torit and Ikotos. Security high numbers of weapons in civilian by even fewer (6 per cent). ranked at or near the bottom of hands, and shattered social and com- Attitudes towards disarmament overall concerns in all counties. munity relations. were positive, with around 68 per When asked about their greatest EES has also experienced chronic cent of the total sample reporting a security concerns, respondents in food insecurity, a lack of basic services, willingness to give up their firearms, Torit and Ikotos cited cattle rustling, and few economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Consider
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Appeal Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 E-mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office South Sudan Assistance to Returnees & Local Communities in Ikotos and Kapoeta Counties - AFSD82 Appeal Target: US$ 1,781,269 Geneva, 7 May, 2008 Dear Colleagues, For South Sudan the Comprehensive Peace Agreement CPA means that a history of war, with societies ’ influx, has been replaced with a transition – again with societies influx. ACT member the Lutheran World Federation Sudan Country program is facing many challenges to address both humanitarian assistance and sustainable development which are the two main premises of LWF/DWS work. In 2004/2005, the LWF Uganda/Sudan implemented an emergency response and development project in Torit County in South Sudan’s Eastern Equatoria Region. Now, Torit County has been divided into three counties namely Ikotos, Torit, and Lafon. In the year 2007 under ACT appeal AFSD 71 emergency response to the Sudanese refugee and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) returnees continued in Ikotos county. This emergency response project provided food, agricultural tools and seeds, and Non-Food Items (NFIs) to the Sudanese refugee returnees, the Internally Displaced People (IDPs) and the resident communities. Also, the project supported capacity building of local government authorities and construction of boreholes and schools. The arrival of both UNHCR assisted and spontaneous returnees continues to increase and UNHCR and Southern Sudan Government projections indicate a higher number of returnees in 2008. This Appeal will be implemented in Ikotos and Kapoeta counties and is designed to fulfil the immediate needs of the Sudanese refugee and (IDPs) returnees and assist the resident communities to cope with the increasing number of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Border Intervention for Refugees Returnees and South Sudanese Host Community, Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County)
    Cross-border Refugees-Returnees Need Assessment (Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County) Photo: Returnees Children footing to Ikotos Town Papa John Martin Sebastian Monitoring & Evaluation Officer, AVSI-Foundation South Sudan. Contact: Email address: [email protected] Mobile Phone: +211929840006 Skype: papajohnmartin30 Ikotos County, Torit State ICRROSS (Cross border intervention for Refugees Returnees and South Sudanese Host Community, Palabek Camp Lamwo District and Ikotos County) 1 Table of Context I. ACRONYMS: ……………………………………………………………………………….…………………. 2 II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: ………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 IV. Introduction: ………………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 (a) Background: ………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1. Methodology: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. Objectives: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 3. Key Findings: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 A. Household Information: …………………………………………………………………….. 6 B. Relatives in Ikotos County: …………………………………………………………………. 7 C. Experience of returning back to South Sudan: ……………………………………. 8 D. Plan for the Future: ……………………………………………………………………………. 9 4. Recommendation: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 I. ACRONYMS List of Acronyms ICRROSS: Cross border Intervention for Returnees Refugees of South Sudan and the Host community FE: Financial Education CEVSI: Cooperazione E Sviluppo AVSI: Association of Volunteers in International Service CBI: Cash base intervention AICS:
    [Show full text]
  • Central Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Jonglei Lakes
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 10 Mar 2017 Eastern Equatoria State - WASH INDICATOR REACH calculated the areas more likely to have WASH needs basing the estimation on the data collected between January and February 2017 with the Area of Knowledge (AoK) approach, using the following methEodotloghy. iopia The indicator was created by averaging the percentages of key informants (KIs) reporting on the J o n g l e i following for specific settlements: - Accessibility to safe drinking water 0% indicates a reported impossibility to access safe drinking water by all KIs, while 100% indicates safe drinking water was reported accessible by each KI. Only assessed settlements are shown on the map. Values for different settlements have been averaged L a k e s and represented with hexagons 10km wide. Kapoeta Lopa County Kapoeta East North County County C e n t r a l E a s t e r n E q u a t o r i a Imehejek E q u a t o r i a Lohutok Kapoeta South County Narus Torit Torit County Budi County Magwi Lotukei Ikotos County Pageri Parajok Magwi County Nimule Kenya Uganda Sudan 0 25 50 km Data sources: Ethiopia Settlements assessed Boundaries WASH indicator Thematic indicators: REACH Administrative boundaries: UNOCHA; State capital International 0.81 - 1 Settlements: UNOCHA; County capital 0.61 - 0.8 Coordinate System:GCS WGS 1984 C.A.R. County Contact: [email protected] Principal town 0.41 - 0.6 Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained Juba State Village 0.21 - 0.4 on this map are not warranted to be error-free and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, Disputed area associates, donors or any other stakeholder D.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Inconclusive Peace and Treacherous Trade Along the South Sudan–Uganda Border Mareike Schomerus and Kristof Titeca
    ● ● ● ● Africa Spectrum 2-3/2012: 5-31 Deals and Dealings: Inconclusive Peace and Treacherous Trade along the South Sudan–Uganda Border Mareike Schomerus and Kristof Titeca Abstract: Since Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed, its border with Uganda has become a hub of activity. Contrasting develop- ments on the Ugandan side of the border with those on the South Sudanese side, the paper draws on empirical fieldwork to argue that the CPA has cre- ated new centres of power in the margins of both states. However, in day-to- day dealings on either side of the border, South Sudanese military actors have become dominant. In the particular case of Arua and the South Sudan– Uganda border, past wartime authority structures determine access to op- portunities in a tightly regulated, inconclusive peace. This means that small- scale Ugandan traders – although vital to South Sudan – have become more vulnerable to South Sudan’s assertions of state authority. The experience of Ugandan traders calls into question the broad consensus that trade across the border is always beneficial for peace-building. The paper concludes that trade is not unconditionally helpful to the establishment of a peaceful envi- ronment for everyone. Manuscript received 3 January 2012; accepted 17 July 2012 Keywords: South Sudan, Uganda, peace process, transit traffic Mareike Schomerus is the consortium director of the Justice and Security Research Programme in the Department of International Development at the London School of Economics. She trained in both social sciences and humanities. Her work currently focuses on violent conflict and obstacles to transformative peace processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    Responding to Violence in Ikotos County, South Sudan: Government and Local Efforts to Restore Order By Clement Ochan Children in Ikotos, South Sudan, using spent cartridges as toys. Credit: Clement Ochan Summary The study sought to document and analyze community responses to recent violence and local efforts to bring about relative security in Ikotos County, Eastern Equatoria, South Sudan. It set out to: • document and analyze the range of causes and consequences of violence in the area • understand the gender and generational aspects of the violence and its consequences • explore mechanisms to bring about security • explore the role of civilian groups—including church leaders, men, women, youths, children and elders—in pressing for new gun control laws • assess the impact of restrictions on weapons imposed in 2004 • understand the short- and long-term future of the security improvement program in Ikotos County. The field work for the study was conducted between May and August 2006. Clement Ochan, the lead researcher, was assisted by Ladu Tobias. Ochan drew upon five years of work experience in the area to help inform the analysis and locate key informants. Relevant information from 2005 field interviews in the same area was used where appropriate. The team also used secondary data to help provide context and flesh out their findings. The team mainly relied on key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation for data collection. Data was collected primarily in Ikotos town. All group discussions were held in the town or the workplaces of consulted organisations. Where possible, the team used a digital voice recorder to capture the interviews and discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan IDSR Annex
    South Sudan Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Annexes W51 2017 (Dec 18-Dec 24) Ministry of Health Printed: 18:19 Sunday, 31 December 2017 UTC Republic of South Sudan Contents Access and Utilisation Acute Watery Diarrhoea (AWD) Slide 2 Map 1 Map of consultations by county (2017) Slide 8 Trend in AWD cases over time Slide 9 AWD maps and alert management Indicator-based surveillance Slide 3 Figure 1 Proportional mortality Bloody diarrhoea Slide 4 Figure 2 Proportional morbidity Slide 10 Trend in bloody diarrhoea cases over time Slide 5 Figure 3 Trend in consultations and key diseases Slide 11 Bloody diarrhoea maps and alert management Disease trends and maps Measles Malaria Slide 12 Trend in measles cases over time Slide 13 Measles maps and alert management Slide 6 Trend in malaria cases over time Slide 7 Malaria maps and alert management Sources of data 1. Weekly IDSR Reporting Form 2. Weekly EWARS Reporting Form 1 W51 2017 (Dec 18-Dec 24) Access and Utilisation | Map of consultations by county Map 1 | Map of total consultations by county (W51 2017) Hub W51 2017 Aweil 2,787 786,757 Renk Bentiu 6,796 989,471 Manyo Bor 4,042 441,376 Melut Juba 4,642 517,038 Fashoda Maban Abyei Pariang Malakal Kwajok 5,110 874,587 Abiemnhom Panyikang Baliet Aweil North Aweil East RubkonGa uit Longechuk Twic Mayom FangakCanal Pigi Malakal 4,992 771,575 Aweil West Luakpiny Nasir Aweil South Maiwut Raja GogriaGl oWgerisatl East Koch Nyirol Ulang Aweil Centre Rumbek 10,960 839,521 Tonj North Ayod MayenLdeiter Torit 34 370,377 Tonj East Akobo Duk
    [Show full text]
  • Symptoms and Causes Insecurity and Underdevelopment in Eastern Equatoria
    sudanHuman Security Baseline Assessment issue brief Small Arms Survey Number 16 April 2010 Symptoms and causes Insecurity and underdevelopment in Eastern Equatoria astern Equatoria state (EES) is The survey was supplemented by qual- 24,789 (± 965) households in the one of the most volatile and itative interviews and focus group three counties contain at least one E conflict-prone states in South- discussions with key stakeholders in firearm. ern Sudan. An epicentre of the civil EES and Juba in January 2010. Respondents cited traditional lead- war (1983–2005), EES saw intense Key findings include: ers (clan elders and village chiefs) fighting between the Sudanese Armed as the primary security providers Across the entire sample, respond- Forces (SAF) and the Sudan People’s in their areas (90 per cent), followed ents ranked education and access Liberation Army (SPLA), as well by neighbours (48 per cent) and reli- to adequate health care as their numerous armed groups supported gious leaders (38 per cent). Police most pressing concerns, followed by both sides, leaving behind a legacy presence was only cited by 27 per by clean water. Food was also a top of landmines and unexploded ordnance, cent of respondents and the SPLA concern in Torit and Ikotos. Security high numbers of weapons in civilian by even fewer (6 per cent). ranked at or near the bottom of hands, and shattered social and com- Attitudes towards disarmament overall concerns in all counties. munity relations. were positive, with around 68 per When asked about their greatest EES has also experienced chronic cent of the total sample reporting a security concerns, respondents in food insecurity, a lack of basic services, willingness to give up their firearms, Torit and Ikotos cited cattle rustling, and few economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Reference Map The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 15 June 2017 24°0'0"E 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E 37°0'0"E Kalu Shearia Shaqq Al Gawa Garoula ÆÖ Redis, Abu Zabad Kashafa, Jouri Dauro IDP camps "Emtitode " Ghubaysh Ayaal-Edris Saferi "Neem ÖÆ Baddal PoC N ""Wounthau Delling " Nyala Remela "Dukduk 0 "Tayyibah ' Muhajiriya Saheib Hai Jebeleen" "Halaka 0 R K e Mabrouka o Habila n ° s ×Æ Tono k t - i Spontaneous settlement 2 Abu Shalaya "Wun Ghir " 1 Dalami Rashad El Roseires ² "Wunchol Dago Ed Damazine ÖÆ Baraka Wad Hassib " Keikei "Kumsur Rom " Refugee camp Um Boim El Fula " Saraya Boma Manyo County Omar" Solwong Murr Renk Girru Um La`ota Abu Ajura Abu Karaynka Settlements Al Marwahah Faki Ibrahim "Chamidi-A Umm Heitan "Abayok Abu Jubaiha \ Gettin o Ed Daein R . D l e i b Country capital Lagawa "Alek "Bangjang Abu Tabanu El Buheimer Renk County "Lon" gtem " Gereida " Molbok Ktpiol State capital Heiban Barbari Kubbi " Shergeila Tullus Jidad County capital N " "Jalhak " Miri Juwa Kadugli Wun Atem 0 ' " Injbara 0 Sibdu ° Wad Rizq Far` Al Habil Principal town Manang" 1 Al Malwi t lu 1 e Harazah Ruqay M R Umm Dorain Kologi - Mumallah k . n Keilak " e S Anunbul R a Buram ng " e i Sudan r Geissan Village Ab u G A e t b Finote Selam h i S a m a i h l - a d a e w - R .
    [Show full text]
  • Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment
    Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment Eastern Equatoria, Upper Nile & Jonglei States Prepared for UNICEF South Sudan Conducted by Forcier Consulting Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment: Eastern Equatoria Upper Nile Jonglei Prepared for: UNICEF South Sudan Prepared by: Natalie Forcier Nadia Kevlin Evan Callis Benedicte Bakkeskau Amy Hall June 2012 Acknowledgements The cooperation and assistance of several organizations and individuals were crucial in the implementation of this baseline assessment, and thus the research team would like to extend their sincere gratitude to the following: H.E. Brigadier General Louis Lobong Lojore, Governor of Eastern Equatoria State H.E. Titos Lokwacuma Loteam, Commissioner of Kapoeta East County H.E. Joseph Napengiro Lokolong, Commissioner of Budi County H.E. Kuol Manyang Juuk, Governor of Jonglei State H.E. Colonel Isaac Kuach Duoth, Commissioner of Nyirol County H.E. Tut Puok Nyang, Commissioner of Uror County H.E. Brigadier General Simon Kun Puoch, Governor of Upper Nile State H.E. Dak Tap Chuol, Commissioner of Nasir County H.E. Peter Chuol Biel, Commissioner of Ulang County Pelucy Ntambirweki, UNICEF Fred Ogwal, UNICEF Jairus Ligoo, UNICEF Sophie Busi, UNICEF Finally, on behalf of Forcier Consulting and the research team, I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to the citizens who volunteered their time to participate in this important assessment. Natalie Forcier Managing Director Forcier Consulting July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]