Proposed Pre-Approval Framework for Over-Dimension Agricultural Vehicle Movements AUTHOR Principal Engineer - Transport Planning (David Hood)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposed Pre-Approval Framework for Over-Dimension Agricultural Vehicle Movements AUTHOR Principal Engineer - Transport Planning (David Hood) Toowoomba Regional Council Infrastructure Committee 10 October 2017 Item No. 02 Item No. 02 REPORT TITLE Proposed Pre-Approval Framework for Over-Dimension Agricultural Vehicle Movements AUTHOR Principal Engineer - Transport Planning (David Hood) PURPOSE OF REPORT To seek Council’s endorsement of a framework under which Council could ‘pre-approve’ the issue of a permit for the movement of wide agricultural vehicles on Council-controlled roads, in appropriate circumstances. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At its Ordinary Meeting on 17 November 2015 (Infrastructure Committee - 10 November 2015 - Item 01), Council endorsed a number of initiatives to facilitate more efficient agricultural and transport logistics outcomes within and beyond the Toowoomba and Western Downs Regional Council (WDRC) local government areas. One of these initiatives was the establishment of an Agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group to investigate a range of short, medium and longer-term measures arising from the Agricultural Freight Industry Workshop held on 2 October 2015. The Group was established and its inaugural meeting was held on 9 March 2016. Since that time, Council has implemented the endorsed short-term initiatives for heavy vehicle logistics, by extending the operating hours and permit durations and standardising speed limits for multi-combination vehicles permits issued within the Toowoomba Region. WDRC have also implemented similar initiatives. In relation to agricultural transport, this report seeks Council endorsement of a framework, recommended by the Agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group Meeting of 28 August 2017, for Council to ‘pre-approve’ the granting of permits for the movement of over-dimension agricultural vehicles in appropriate circumstances, including the ‘pre-approval’ conditions and the proposed administrative arrangements around issuing permits of this type. RECOMMENDATION That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate, finalise and implement the proposed framework as outlined in the report included in Attachment 2 ‘Proposed Pre-Approval Conditions for Over-Dimension Agricultural Vehicles Using the Local Government Controlled Road Network - September 2017 (Toowoomba Regional Council),’ to come into effect on 1 February 2018. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION To enable and support the economic development of the region through enhancing the efficiency of agricultural over-dimension vehicle movements, while managing the safety and other impacts on rural road users. Page 1 of 4 Toowoomba Regional Council Infrastructure Committee 10 October 2017 Item No. 02 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to negotiate, finalise and implement the proposed framework as outlined in the report included in Attachment 2 ‘Proposed Pre-Approval Conditions for Over-Dimension Agricultural Vehicles Using the Local Government Controlled Road Network - September 2017 (Toowoomba Regional Council),’ to come into effect on 1 February 2018. COUNCIL DECISION - 17 October 2017 (Infrastructure Committee - 10 October 2017 - Item No. 02) Committee Recommendation adopted by Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 17 October 2017. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Item Action Officer Action No. 02 David Hood Please instigate all follow up action from Council's decision. Page 2 of 4 Toowoomba Regional Council Infrastructure Committee 10 October 2017 Item No. 02 CORPORATE PLAN REFERENCE 5.1.2 - Ensure the provision and management of infrastructure and assets meet the needs and priorities of Council, the community and industry. 5.1.4 - Plan and deliver a safe, sustainable and efficient road network. 7.2.1 - Continually review and enhance service delivery to ensure Council's responsiveness to customer and community expectations. 7.2.2 - Work collaboratively across Council to provide effective, efficient and coordinated outcomes. BACKGROUND At its Ordinary Meeting on 17 November 2015 (Infrastructure Committee - 10 November 2015 - Item 01), Council endorsed a number of initiatives to facilitate more efficient agricultural and transport logistics outcomes within and beyond the Toowoomba and Western Downs Regional Council local government areas. A copy of the report presented to Council in November 2015 is Attachment 1. One of the initiatives was to establish an Agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group to investigate a range of short, medium and longer-term measures arising from the Agricultural Freight Industry Workshop held on 2 October 2015. The Group was established and its inaugural meeting was held on 9 March 2016. Extensive work has been undertaken with industry and regulatory representatives in relation to a pre-approval framework for the movement of over-dimension agricultural vehicles. Further detailed background and proposed operational conditions are included in Attachment 2, which presents a recommended approval mechanism and proposes ‘pre-approval conditions’ for the granting of permits under section 4.2.4 of the ‘Guidelines for Excess Dimension’ Agricultural Vehicles and Agricultural Combinations - Form 14, Version 4, October 2013 for Minor Roads, that are maintained roads falling under the jurisdiction of Toowoomba Regional Council or WDRC. CONSULTATION UNDERTAKEN This proposal has been the joint work of relevant members of the Agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group. As such it represents a general consensus of all parties associated with the movement of over-dimension agricultural vehicles, and at the Working Group Meeting of 28 August 2017, the proposed framework was recommended for endorsement by both Toowoomba Regional Council and Western Downs Regional Council. An Information Session on this matter was held with Councillors on 3 October 2017. ISSUES, RISKS AND RESPONSES The current Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Form 14 does not cover the movement of agricultural vehicles wider than 5m on either the declared or local government road networks. Due to the uncertainty and timeframes associated with permit approvals, it is thought that numbers of movements wider than 5m could be occurring without permits being sought. This is of concern to industry, regulators and road authorities alike. One of the main drivers behind the development of this framework is to encourage users to apply for permits wider than covered under Form 14, with clarity and certainty as to what conditions would be applied to those permits. Page 3 of 4 Toowoomba Regional Council Infrastructure Committee 10 October 2017 Item No. 02 There are no recorded incidents on Council’s road network involving over-dimension agricultural vehicles. FINANCIAL / RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS There are minimal financial and resource implications associated with implementing the recommendations contained within this report. The number of permit applications for over- dimension agricultural vehicles is currently very small. Under the pre-approval framework, there would continue to be minimal administrative effort on behalf of Council in relation to issuing permits, apart from periodic review of the framework itself. CONCLUSION The recommendations contained in this report would deliver one of the significant medium-term objectives of Council’s decision of November 2015 for the agricultural sector. Work on the remaining medium and longer-term objectives is continuing. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 of 2 Council report ‘Outcomes from the Agriculture Freight Industry Workshop’, November 2015 Attachment 2 of 2 Proposed pre-approval conditions for over-dimension agricultural vehicles using the local government controlled road network - September 2017 (Toowoomba Regional Council) Page 4 of 4 Attachment 2 Proposed pre-approval framework for over-dimension agricultural vehicle movements on the local government controlled road network – September 2017 (Toowoomba Regional Council) Executive Summary This report presents a recommended approval mechanism and proposes ‘pre-approval conditions’ for the granting of permits under section 4.2.4 of the ‘Guidelines for Excess Dimension’ Agricultural Vehicles and Agricultural Combinations – Form 14, Version 4, October 2013 for Minor Roads that are maintained roads falling under the jurisdiction of Toowoomba Regional Council or Western Downs Regional Council. Purpose The purpose of this document is to record: (a) issues raised by members of the agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group through its deliberations; and (b) the proposed solutions tabled at the August 2017 meeting of the Group (as modified following discussion at the meeting about the proposed pre-approval conditions for access to the minor road network for agricultural vehicles wider than 5.0 metres). Background Currently, agricultural vehicles that do not comply with the Transport Operations (Road Use Management - Mass, Dimensions and Loading) Regulation 2005, Part 3, may be able to access the road network in Queensland through a method of alternative compliance known as the ‘Guideline for Excess Dimension, Agricultural Vehicles and Agricultural Combinations, Vehicles and Drivers, Form 14 V4 Transport and Main Roads, October 2013’ (Form 14). Form 14 specifies access conditions for agricultural vehicles up to 5.0 metres wide for the purpose of crossing or travelling along a road. Where an agricultural vehicle exceeds the maximum dimension limits specified in Form 14, movement may be effected where an alternative authority approval is obtained. The Agricultural Transport and Logistics Working Group received representation from several peak bodies, including
Recommended publications
  • Toowoomba Regional Council Tackles the Challenges of a Failing
    CASE STUDY Project Summary Toowoomba Regional Council Tackles the Challenges Organization: Toowoomba Regional Council of a Failing Common Effluent System Using SewerGEMS Location: Crows Nest, Queensland, Australia Bentley Software Helps Council Compare Conventional Gravity and Pressure Sewer Project Objective: Systems to Recommend Optimal System • Compare a conventional gravity system and a pressure sewer system, including the In Queensland, Australia, in 2008, eight local governments capital costs of the two options Issues with the Existing System at Crows Nest were merged into one to form what is now the Toowoomba The first system addressed was a regional system operated • Validate predicted flows to Regional Council (TRC). This council serves a population of by TRC, known as the common effluent drainage (CED) system appropriately size a pressure approximately 120,000, and maintains water and wastewater sewer system in the town of Crows Nest, Queensland. The CED system networks totaling 3,200 kilometers in reticulation mains. services a population of approximately 1,500 and consists of Products used: SewerGEMS TRC undertook a study in 2011 focusing on the township 24.5 kilometers of sewer mains with five pumping stations. WaterGEMS of Crows Nest as its flagship for assessing the existing This system was chosen because of its poor track record of infrastructure and the development of a future sewer system. effluent issues and wet weather overflows. The study was designed to identify whether a conventional Fast Facts gravity system would be a more cost-effective option than a • The study assessed the failing pressure sewer system. Consideration of various conditions drainage system in the town of such as population densities, topographic constraints and the Crows Nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils in the Toowoomba Area, Darling Downs, Queensland
    IMPORTANT NOTICE © Copyright Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (‘CSIRO’) Australia. All rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Division of Land and Water. The data, results and analyses contained in this publication are based on a number of technical, circumstantial or otherwise specified assumptions and parameters. The user must make its own assessment of the suitability for its use of the information or material contained in or generated from the publication. To the extend permitted by law, CSIRO excludes all liability to any person or organisation for expenses, losses, liability and costs arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in whole or in part) and any information or material contained in it. The publication must not be used as a means of endorsement without the prior written consent of CSIRO. NOTE This report and accompanying maps are scanned and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on this information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This digital document is provided as information by the Department of Natural Resources and Water under agreement with CSIRO Division of Land and Water and remains their property. All enquiries regarding the content of this document should be referred to CSIRO Division of Land and Water. The Department of Natural Resources and Water nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result in any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakey Community Directory
    Oakey Community Directory Tuesday, 28 September 2021 The Oakey Community Directory Table of Contents Aboriginal Health Services.....................................................................................................................1 Aged Care Accommodation Services.....................................................................................................1 Ageing Accommodation.........................................................................................................................2 Ageing Respite & Activity Centres.........................................................................................................2 Allied Health...........................................................................................................................................2 Animal Shelters......................................................................................................................................3 Aquatic Sports........................................................................................................................................3 Churches and Places of Worship ...........................................................................................................3 Community Halls....................................................................................................................................4 Community Information & Referral Services........................................................................................5 Community Service Clubs
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport
    13. Traffic and Transport Contents 13 Traffic and Transport 13-1 13.1 Introduction 13-1 13.2 Regulatory framework 13-1 13.2.1 Guidelines for Assessment of Road Impacts of Development (GARID) 13-1 13.3 Existing traffic and transport environment 13-2 13.3.1 Description of existing infrastructure 13-2 13.3.2 State controlled roads 13-4 13.3.3 Local roads 13-5 13.3.4 School bus routes 13-6 13.3.5 Road crash data 13-8 13.3.6 Scheduled road improvements 13-8 13.3.7 Police and emergency services 13-8 13.3.8 Public transport services 13-8 13.3.9 Rail and Port facilities 13-9 13.3.10 Airport services 13-9 13.3.11 Infrastructure requirements 13-9 13.4 Background traffic 13-10 13.4.1 Existing (2012) traffic volumes 13-10 13.5 Existing road level of service 13-11 13.5.1 Performance criteria 13-11 13.5.2 Existing level of service - 2012 13-11 13.5.3 Existing intersection counts 13-12 13.5.4 Historic traffic growth 13-13 13.5.5 Background traffic growth 13-13 13.5.6 Committed developments 13-13 13.6 Project overview 13-14 13.6.1 Project time frames 13-14 13.6.2 Proposed site access and haul roads 13-14 13.6.3 Proposed road diversions and closures 13-17 13.6.4 Rail transportation 13-22 13.7 Project construction phase 13-27 13.7.1 Construction working hours 13-27 13.7.2 Construction workforce traffic 13-27 13.7.3 Construction equipment and materials 13-28 13.7.4 Heavy vehicles and oversized vehicles 13-30 13.7.5 Hazardous and dangerous materials 13-30 13.7.6 Construction phase traffic 13-30 13.8 Project operation phase 13-34 13.8.1 Operation working hours
    [Show full text]
  • Crows Nest Community Growth Action Plan
    Crows Nest 2022 ‘The High Country Haven’ Community Growth Action Plan Draft Report January 2018 Crows Nest Community Growth Action Plan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 3 1 OUR TOWN .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Our People .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Our Workforce ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Our Key Industries ................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Our Services and Facilities ...................................................................................................... 4 2 OUR VISION FOR THE FUTURE ............................................................................................... 5 2.1 Our Action Plan ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Our Key Priority Strategies ...................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Our Priority Actions ................................................................................................................. 7 3 OUR STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES,
    [Show full text]
  • Gowrie to Helidon Summary of Findings
    Summary of findings View of the Lockyer Valley, looking north-east from Prince Henry Heights. Gowrie to Helidon Draft Environmental Impact Statement GOWRIE TO HELIDON SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Inland Rail acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land on which we work and pay our respect to their Elders past, present and emerging. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by ARTC and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. Project visualisations in this document are for illustrative purposes and not to scale. Please note, the reference design may change as a result of further investigations, government approvals or during detailed design. Printed on uncoated ecostar paper. This document is uncontrolled when printed. © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited 2021 ii INLAND RAIL Summary of findings 02 How to have your say 04 Background 06 Introduction 06 Project rationale 10 Project approvals 14 Assessment methodology 16 Stakeholder engagement 18 Project description 22 Key findings of the EIS 28 Sustainability 28 Land use and tenure 29 Land resources 32 Landscape and
    [Show full text]
  • I've Been Everywhere Man!
    es ltop Cr Hil Sk yline D r 85 Y A Mount G AND HIGHW y St o ynoch ombungee Rd K oundar B W ENGL NE A3 M c S h a n e Ballard D Mount r er Morris Rd z an Kynoch G d St edfor B Ganzers Rd Hermitage Rd Hermitage Rd Hermitage Rd es St op Cr y St Hillt attle Cranley w Goombungee Rd inch Rd Sk oundar n ee yline D B Gr r gent P u N 85 85 ys Ct t Bedwell St er e Ct Gleeson Cr es r eb illiam Ct v cle Y Kelly St W A ho Mc P er St Lila D y r ophia C ophia Burnview Ave Walsh St w Ryans Dr S es D yle St o T Mount Coonan St D G or St AND HIGHW e y St ch o Kyno ombungee Rd v Ella Ct Mor e A r ounda t St yc alim St B C o W ENGL Binda Dr B St Willo NE w A ve v oll A attle e Nic A3 w M P c rinc r S h n ee Ballard Alpine Ct a Mount n e St r G Gregory St Hhal St e D r derick D Hogg St Hogg St Ro Kynoch er Morris Rd Hendy St Seppelt St Perry St z an Felix St Chopin St r G air St d St Cotswold F J ohn Ct t St edfor an St Mabel St Pedersen St B r o Jonathan St r Hermitage Rd P Ganzers Rd Mor unc old Hills D Hermitage Rd Hermitage Rd Hills D Montana St Holb Kate St Mount St t St otsw r Cranley er St David St C y St Lofty D Hamzah er Bingar Katim Ct attle arr ossan St r T w F anda D Go t alinga St ir ombungeeon RdSt inch Rd M oundar een al St B r a St Macr r Abif St G ine D Hawk St wnlands at Ct y St gent P W e St Do y St estiv et St F u N 85 aminer D or St inch Rd r ollege eac gandy St C eah T T Mar P L c Mus Civil Ct y Ct Sherr Clar ys Ct t Bedwell St Barlow St Bur y St r e tin St e Ct Makepeace St gent P r Gleeson Cr ent es Mole St r v eb illiam Ct Maureen
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report | 2012/13
    GOVERNANCE COMMUNITY Annual Report | 2012/13 BUILT ENVIRONMENT NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY Goals, outcomes and strategic actions Our Facts By referencing this table and following the colour coded tabs, readers are able to see at a glance Council’s outcomes throughout 2012/13 across the five key goals of Community, • Toowoomba Regional Council is the ninth largest Governance, Built Environment, Natural Environment and Economy. Local Government area (LGA) in population (157,695 Leave this tab open while browsing the Annual Report. persons) of the 74 Queensland LGAs, following COMMUNITY Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Moreton Bay, the Sunshine Coast, Logan, Townsville, Cairns and Ipswich. A safe, healthy and equitable community, enjoying a quality lifestyle. • Population projections to the year 2031 show that Opportunities for creative expression, cultural exchange the TRC area’s population is expected to increase by and life long learning are accessible community wide. 86,645 persons – or an average annual growth rate of 2.0% – to a population of approximately 244,340 A community involved in sport and recreational activities. persons. By comparison, the forecast growth for The Toowoomba region has high-quality environmental Queensland is 1.8% per annum over the same period. health standards. • TRC covers 12,973 sq km, with more than 10,000 kms A community that is safe, friendly, resilient and informed. of road infrastructure. Our communities value and share cultural diversity • The region’s major enterprises include and intergenerational knowledge and skills. manufacturing, health and community services, retail and agriculture. The region supports the junctions of GOVERNANCE major highways from Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Darwin, and is just a 90-minute drive from the A well-governed Council respecting community values.
    [Show full text]
  • Toowoomba Railway Roll of Honour Board 1914-19
    Toowoomba Railway Roll of Honour Board 1914-19 Dedication This research is dedicate to all those who are recorded on the roll of honour board but especially to 425 Pte David McCarthy, 9th Bn, killed in action on 25th April 1915. Introduction This research was started after a visit to Toowoomba station in July 2015 and discovering that the 559 names on the impressive roll of honour board appeared not to have been identified or, if this work has been done, was not readily available. The aim of this initial research was to get basic details of those men listed; it is not intended to be a comprehensive account of the soldiers on the roll of honour board or railways in the Darling Downs region. Sources used included records held by the Australian War Memorial, Canberra, and the National Archives of Australia. Consequently, there may well be errors and conflicting detail; the entries for each man are headline information only – anyone wishing to drill deeper should consult sources such as the soldiers’ personal papers, newspapers, unit war diaries and histories etc. In some instances, the ‘identified’ soldier may prove to be incorrect but at this stage the most likely identification is listed; details generally have been used verbatim from sources. One hindrance was ‘occupation’ as many do not have an obvious railway trade; it is possible that some had other jobs in addition to their railway employment. A line was drawn under this work in late 2016 still with eighteen names unidentified despite trying various sources. Most of the other names were identified with a good degree of confidence but readers are invited to take this work and refine it further.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Initial Advice Statement Part 4 of 5
    ") TOR STREET Gowrie BRIDGE STREET ET RE JAMES STREET ST GE ID R B TAYLOR STREET ANZAC AVENUE AD RO ON GT IN R R A Charlton C ") AY HW IG H D A GO E RO RR A ") Wellcamp Oakey W INS A L Westbrook ") P L ") CI CE A B M O O W O O T Athol ") Umbiram ") GORE HIGHWAY GORE O A K E Y P Southbrook I T T S ") W O R T H R O A D O A K E Y P P IT IT T T SW S O W RT O H R T FE H L ROA T D O N R O A D Pittsworth ") Legend Data sources: OVERVIEW Remnant Vegetation, Essential Habitat - Initial Advice Statement ") Towns Remnant Vegetation DNRM 2017 Protected Areas - DNPSR 2017 Environmental Corridors - DEHP Border to Gowrie Project Existing Rail Network Category A or B area containing endangered regional ecosystems ´ Roads and Rail Network - DNRM 2017 www.aecom.com 7 Imagery - QLDGov 2017 Conceptual Alignment Category A or B area that is a least concern regional ecosystem © SISP Imagery 2017 Major Roads 0 20 40 6 Category A or B area containing of concern regional ecosystems Kms Disclaimer: Major Rivers 5 While every care is taken to ensure the Statewide environmental corridors (DEHP) accuracy of the Information Product, the State Study Area of Queensland makes no representations or State warranties about its accuracy, reliability, Ecology, flora and fauna Protected areas 4 completeness or suitability for any particular ´ Regional purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56 Essential habitat liability (including without limitation, liability in Projection: Transverse Mercator 3 negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages PROJECT ID: 60492124 State Boundary (including indirect or consequential damage) 2 and costs which you might incur as a result of CREATED BY: JR Figure 0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 Adjacent Inland Rail Project 1 the product being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakey Creek Stocked with Native Fingerlings
    Support for New Hope mining It saddens me to hear the constant negativ- If the Stage 3 proposal is rejected, I will be ity and ill-support of the New Hope Group out of a job and, undoubtedly, forced to sell Acland coal mine operation on the Darling our livestock and the family farm. No doubt Downs. we will also move from this district entirely. It is a little known fact how much support As a conscientious member of and parent New Hope Coal lends to the community in the Maclagan/Quinalow region I have seen within which it operates. Having earned a first hand the increase in the population in living as a fourth generation dairy farmer at this district as a direct result of the employ- Maclagan - our family has farmed the land ment opportunities New Hope Group of- since the Crown allotted it to my ancestors fers. some 100 years ago - I feel very passionate New families have purchased long vacant about this region and the welfare of the land. properties and as a result numbers in the local Growing up in primary industry, I was Maclagan kindergarten, Quinalow school and sceptical of mining before experiencing first swimming club are rising with every year. We hand the environmental care, land manage- are repeatedly informed of a decrease in popu- ment practices and rejuvenation commitment lation at Acland but rarely is the population of the New Hope Group. Now, I would rec- increase associated with the mine to nearby ommend purchase of, and certainly consider and similarly small towns such as Quinalow, purchasing myself, any land which New Hope Maclagan, Evergreen and Peranga acknowl- may offer for sale in the years to come for edged.
    [Show full text]
  • Toowoomba (PDF, 692KB)
    ± S O U T H B U R N E T T R E G II O N A L Yarraman Upper Gilla Yarraman S O M E R S E T Cherry Creek R E G I O N A L Kooralgin R E G I O N A L Googa Upper Cooyar Cooyar Creek Creek Rangemore Mount Binga North Wutul East Maclagan Cooyar W E S T E R N D O W N S R E G II O N A L Nutgrove Malling Maclagan Thornville St Emu Anduramba Woodleigh Aubyn Creek Narko Highgrove Coalbank Quinalow Peranga Evergreen Irvingdale Doctor Jones Pierces Creek Kulpi Creek Djuan Gully Glenaven Mount Mountain The Darry Camp Bluff Rosalie Haden Upper Brymaroo Plains Pinelands Kilbirnie Cressbrook Bowenville Crows Creek Balgowan Nest Highland Bergen Muldu Plains Plainby Malu Whichello Silverleigh Goombungee Acland Pechey Douglas Grapetree Wainui Greenwood Groomsville Ravensbourne Merritts Sabine Formartin Creek Devon Muniganeen Perseverance Jondaryan Park Boodua Mount Geham Kelvinhaugh Luke Meringandan Yalangur Palmtree Grassdale Meringandan St Ruth Kleinton West Tipton West Cabarlah Prairie Lilyvale Woolmer Oakey Cutella Highfields Glencoe Cawdor Mount Moriah Yargullen Gowrie Birnam Kingsthorpe Junction Mount Mount Bongeen Aubigny Norwin Irving Kynoch Cecil Plains Nangwee Evanslea Purrawunda Mount Motley Wilsonton Lofty Biddeston Wellcamp Toowoomba Mount Glenvale City Harristown Tyson Rangeville Westbrook Branchview Irongate Rossvale Linthorpe Athol L O C K Y E R Finnie Top Camp V A L L E Y Dunmore Stoneleigh Wyreema Vale Preston Cattle Umbiram R E G II O N A L Brookstead Springside View Hodgson Creek Condamine St Helens Plains Vale Cambooya Pittsworth Southbrook
    [Show full text]