DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a – 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a – 5 APPENDIX A – 5 Air Quality Conformity Analysis MTC Resolution No. 4374 Draft 2019 TIP June 18, 2018 Draft Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area and the 2019 Transportation Improvement Program Draft: June 6, 2018 June 2018 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Ken Kirkey, Director, Planning Harold Brazil, Project Manager Planning & Programming and Allocations Staff Mallory Atkinson Adam Crenshaw Ben Espinoza Ross McKeown Flavia Tsang Lisa Zorn 2019 Tr ansporation Improvement Program P a g e | i Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of Conformity Analysis ................................................................................................................ 1 Status of Regional Transportation Plan .................................................................................................... 3 Status of Transportation Improvement Program ..................................................................................... 4 II. Bay Area Air Pollutant Designations ................................................................................................4 National 1-Hour Ozone Standard .............................................................................................................. 4 National 8-Hour Ozone Standard .............................................................................................................. 5 National PM2.5 Standard ............................................................................................................................ 6 National 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Standard ........................................................................................... 7 Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Conformity Tests ........................................................ 7 III. Conformity Analysis & Results .......................................................................................................9 Approach to Conformity Analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 Analysis Years .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Consultation Process ............................................................................................................................... 10 Comparison of Motor Vehicle Emissions to Budgets .............................................................................. 11 Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5 ................................................................................................... 13 IV. Transportation Control Measures ................................................................................................ 15 History of Transportation Control Measures .......................................................................................... 15 Status of Transportation Control Measures ........................................................................................... 16 V. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 19 VI. Conformity Findings .................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A1. List of Projects in the Draft 2019 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix A2. List of Projects in the Draft 2019 Transportation Improvement Program with Updated Conformity Analysis Years Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Appendix C. Conformity Approach for MTC’s Updated Long-Range Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Memo Appendix D. Travel Modeling Report Appendix E. List of Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Projects Appendix F. Methodology for Bay Area Conformity Determinations 2019 Tr ansporation Improvement Program P a g e | ii List of Tables Table 1: VOC and NOX Emissions Budgets from 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan (tons/day) ......................... 11 Table 2: Vehicle Activity Forecasts .............................................................................................................. 11 Table 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors – Summertime Conditions (tons/day) ..... 12 Table 4: Emission Reductions for Transportation Control Measures A – E in State Implementation Plan (tons/day) .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 5: Vehicle Activity Forecasts for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test .......................................................... 13 Table 6: Emissions Comparison for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test ............................................................... 13 Table 7: Transportation Control Measure in the State Implementation Plan ............................................ 16 Table 8: Implementation Status of Federal Transportation Control Measures for Ozone (A – E) ............. 17 2019 Tr ansporation Improvement Program P a g e | iii List of Figures Figure 1: Map of the Non-Attainment Area for the San Francisco Bay Area ................................................ 2 Figure 2: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors ................................................................ 12 Figure 3: Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5 ........................................................................................ 14 Figure 4: Baseline Year Emissions Test for Wintertime NOX ....................................................................... 14 2019 Tr ansporation Improvement Program P a g e | iv I. Introduction The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) prepares a transportation-air quality conformity analysis (“conformity analysis”) when it amends or updates its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and/or updates its Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or adds or deletes regionally significant, non-exempt projects into the TIP. The purpose of this conformity analysis is to reconform the Amended RTP (“Plan Bay Area 2040”) and to conform the 2019 TIP in accordance with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity regulations and the Bay Area Conformity State Implementation Plan (Conformity SIP), which is also known as the Bay Area Air Quality Conformity Protocol (MTC Resolution No. 3757). This conformity analysis addresses the 2008 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone, the 8-hour national carbon monoxide standard, and the 2006 national 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard. This report explains the basis for the conformity analysis and provides the results used by MTC to make a positive conformity finding for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 TIP. Purpose of Conformity Analysis The Federal Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAAA) outlines requirements for ensuring that federal transportation plans, programs, and projects are consistent with (“conform to”) the purpose of the SIP. Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant national ambient air quality standards. A conformity finding demonstrates that the total emissions projected for a transportation plan (“RTP”) or program (“TIP”) are within the emissions limits ("budgets") established by the SIP, and that transportation control measures (TCMs) are implemented in a timely fashion. Conformity requirements apply in all non-attainment and maintenance areas for transportation-related criteria pollutants and related precursor emissions. For the Bay Area, the criteria pollutants to be addressed are ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide, and PM2.5; and the precursor pollutants to be addressed include volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) for ozone and for PM2.5. EPA’s most recent revisions to its transportation conformity regulations to implement the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act section 176 were published in the Federal Register on March 14, 20121. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) such as MTC are required to follow these regulations, and any other procedures and criteria contained in the EPA-approved Conformity SIP (Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Protocol) for the Bay Area. In the Bay Area, procedures were first adopted in September 1994 to comply with the 1990 CAAA. Four subsequent amendments to the transportation conformity procedures in August 1995, November 1995, August 1997, and July 2006 have been adopted by the three co-lead agencies (MTC, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)). MTC Resolution 3757 represents the latest San Francisco Bay Area Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Protocol adopted by the three
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JPB Board of Directors Meeting of June 4, 2020 Correspondence As Of
    JPB Board of Directors Meeting of June 4, 2020 Correspondence as of May 21, 2020 # Subject 1 Excessive Idling at San Francisco Caltrain Station 2 Diridon Cooperative Agreement 3 Caltrain Sales Tax 4 BATWG Newsletter – May 2020 5 SSF Virtual Town Hall From: Chad Hedstrom <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 1:51 AM To: Public Comment <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Excessive Idling at San Francisco Caltrain station Observed the 912 San Bruno and 923 Baby Bullet, as well as the 913 (THREE (3) train engines) fast idling (very loudly) at the Caltrain station at 4th and King. I walked the entire perimeter of the yard, was not able to determine that any work was being done on any of the three engines. Last train to leave the station was 9:37pm on Sunday night, was last observed at 1:45am Monday morning, still idling. As I am writing this at nearly 2am all three trains continue to idle in an empty yard, resonating for blocks in every direction. 1. Why are these trains idling more than 60 minutes before departure? 2. Why are these trains not using Wayside power? 3. If wayside power is not available, when will wayside power be restored to San Francisco Station? I would ask that trains continue to use wayside power! Several thousand people are directly impacted by the noise. Caltrain has committed to using wayside power when at the station to reduce idling. Now more than ever citizens of San Francisco are staying at home and having to endure excessive idling not just at night, but during the day as well.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT GREEN LIGHT: Moving California's Critical Transportation
    PROJECT GREEN LIGHT: Moving California’s Critical Transportation Improvements Forward MAY 2016 202-466-6706 www.tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ®, of Washington, DC is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary California’s transportation system plays a significant role in the state’s development, providing mobility and access for residents, visitors, businesses and industry. The state’s roads, highways, rails, public transit systems, ports, bicycle paths and walking routes are the backbone of the Golden State’s economy. California’s transportation system also provides for a high quality of life and helps make the state a desirable place to live and visit. The condition and quality of its transportation system will play a critical role in California’s ability to continue to capitalize on its economic advantages and meet the demands of the 21st Century. But, ensuring that California achieves its goals for a high quality of life as well as civic and economic growth will require the ability to “green light” the transportation projects in the state that are critically needed to improve key roads, bridges, highways, public transit systems, rail networks and other transportation facilities. Improving critical segments of California’s transportation system will enhance economic competitiveness and improve the quality of life for the state’s residents and visitors by reducing travel delays and transportation costs, improving access and mobility, enhancing safety, and stimulating sustained job growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Car Rental Fort Lauderdale Fl
    Long Term Car Rental Fort Lauderdale Fl Portly Noah travails: he numb his cetes stagnantly and distinguishably. Unreal and agglutinate Jessee smothers linearly and bellyaches his shetland supply and freely. Decretal or onagraceous, Zebadiah never impignorated any mammets! If you're staying in town are more dream a couple weeks an Avis monthly car rental can help square you money and prepare Book more long-term car rental rather than. What's Trending with Mr Handyman Building secure Versatile. Jaguar palm beach lease Ail Noir. Paper on car long term car rental cars for sale can not include passenger vans, fl with friends and two away to the lauderdale areas can! Cost kore money because american had they take a oak and commercial an 15 hours longer wary of. Frustrating and long term rental car? About Zezgo Car Rental Ft Lauderdale Airport Parking FACILITY DETAILS Zezgo offers customers an excellent alternative for wanted or short term parking for the. Great facial and if I alter to Miami I will definitely rent lost through Riders. To drop unique used cars for sale apartments for rent jobs listings merchandise. Car Rental Fort Lauderdale FLL Airport 26 Cheap Rental. Fort Lauderdale Airport Fort Lauderdale USA Florida Unable to consume any. Sixt has spoke of vehicles for reel to choose from running long distance car rental in Fort Lauderdale at the airport and downtown You order select what suits you bests from one day our economy or luxury cars roomy SUVs 4x4s or convertibles. Sixt Rent luxury Car 2901 SE 6th Ave 2901 SE 6th Ave Fort.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Update Caltrain System
    CALTRAIN UPDATE CALTRAIN SYSTEM • 77 Miles, 32 Stations • 92 Weekday Trains Caltrain owns (SF to SJ) • Tenants (Altamont Corridor Express, Capitol Corridor, Amtrak, Freight) Union Pacific owns (SJ to Gilroy) 2 ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT Area Project Service 51 miles Electrification: Up to 79 mph • Overhead Wiring Service Increase San Francisco to • Traction Power • 6 trains / hour / direction San Jose (Tamien Facilities • More station stops / reduced travel time Station) • Restore weekday Atherton & Broadway Electric Trains (EMUs) service • 19 seven-car trainsets Mixed-fleet service (interim period) (133 cars) Continue tenant service • Altamont Corridor Express, Capitol Corridor, Amtrak, Freight 3 CONSTRUCTION / BUILDING ELECTRIC TRAINS Over 600+ foundations, 300+ poles installed; 8 train cars at the new Utah facility SCHEDULE Caltrain Business Plan Project Update July 2018 through Spring 2019 What Addresses the future potential of the railroad over the next 20-30 years. It will assess the benefits, impacts, and costs of different What is service visions, building the case for investment and a plan for the Caltrain implementation. Business Plan? Why Allows the community and stakeholders to engage in developing a more certain, achievable, financially feasible future for the railroad based on local, regional, and statewide needs. 7 8 What Will the Business Plan Cover? Technical Tracks Service Business Case Community Interface Organization • Number of trains • Value from • Benefits and impacts to • Organizational structure • Frequency of service
    [Show full text]
  • Various Conceptions of Using Cars in the Present Conditions of Digital Technologies Application
    International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 10, Issue 07, July 2019, pp. 112-119, Article ID: IJCIET_10_07_013 Available online at http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJCIET?Volume=10&Issue=7 ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316 © IAEME Publication VARIOUS CONCEPTIONS OF USING CARS IN THE PRESENT CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES APPLICATION Tatyana Sakulyeva PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of forwarding Services Management, State University of Management, 109542, Ryazanskiy prospekt, 99, Moscow, Russia Kseniia Zalikhina Bachelor of Science, State University of Management, 109542, Ryazanskiy prospekt, 99, Moscow, Russia Simone Trombetta Software developer, Kirey Group, Street Monte di Pieta, 32, Turin, Italy ABSTRACT Automobiles spend most part of its life into a parking space. Coherent solution is to change the ownership form - one automobile should be used by many people. The decision can be reached by pre-existing technologies. Digital technologies make it possible to create some other approaches implementation of those were previously not used. This research is devoted to the study of application of various concepts of using cars, that should become an integral part of transport system is megapolises. Carsharing is becoming an absolutely indispensable part of the urban system. Transport outsource is guaranteed to reduce traffic and helps to unload the roads and rush hours. Transport outsource in the modern world is one of the most recognizable and common forms of mobility of passengers flows. Key words: public transport, personal transport, automobile, digital technologies, carsharing, ridesharing, transport outsource. Cite this Article: Tatyana Sakulyeva, Kseniia Zalikhina and Simone Trombetta, Various Conceptions of Using Cars in the Present Conditions of Digital Technologies Application.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Transit Center
    Transbay Transit Center TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Transbay Transit Center Why do we need the Transbay Transit Center? It is time for public infrastructure to meet the needs of the 21st century. The project will centralize a fractured regional transportation network—making transit connections be- tween all points in the Bay Area fast and convenient. The new Transit Center will make public transit a convenient option as it is in other world-class cities, allowing people to travel and commute without the need for a car, thereby decreasing congestion and pollution. The Transit Center will provide a downtown hub in the heart of a new transit- friendly neighborhood with new homes, parks and shops, providing access to public transit literally at the foot of people’s doors. When will I be able to use the Transit Center? The Transit Center building will be completed in 2017 and will be a bustling transit and retail center for those who live, work and visit the heart of downtown San Francisco. When will I be able to take Caltrain into the new Transit Center? The construction of the underground rail extension for the Caltrain rail line and future High Speed Rail is planned to begin in 2012. It is estimated to be completed and operational, along with the Transit Center’s underground rail station, in 2018 or sooner if funding becomes What is the Transbay Transit available. Center Project? How many people will use it? When the rail component is complete, it is estimated that The Transbay Transit Center Project is a visionary more than 20 million people will use the Transit Center transportation and housing project that will transform annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Alderwood Altamonte Mall Apache Mall Augusta Mall Baybrook Mall
    Official Rules - New Year Fitness Resolution Sweepstakes NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. This promotion is not administered by, sponsored, endorsed, or associated with Facebook or Instagram. This Sweepstakes is solely sponsored by General Growth Services, Inc. (“GGSI” or "Sponsor"), it is a national Sweepstakes marketeD at each of the Participating Malls (“Participating Malls”) referenceD-below. DATES: Enter once between January 15, 2018 3:00 PM CST and February 9, 2018 11:59 PM CST (“Promotional Period”). Limit one entry per person. ENTRY: Visit a Participating Mall’s Facebook (“FB”) page, and look for the Sweepstakes message we post and answer the questions on our timeline. ELIGIBILITY: The Sweepstakes is open to legal residents of the 50 United States or D.C., age 18 or older. Employees and officers of GGSI and their respectiVe parent and subsidiary companies and affiliates are not eligible to enter or win. Immediate family members and household members of such indiViduals are also not eligible to enter or win. "Immediate family members" shall mean parents, step-parents, legal guardians, children, step-children, siblings, step-siblings, or spouses. "Household members" shall mean those people who share the same residence at least three months a year. PRIZE/WINNER SELECTION/ODDS: Winner will be selected in a random drawing. The odds of winning depend on the total number of entries receiVed nationally. One Grand Prize winner to receiVe a $100 GGP Gift Card. CLAIMING PRIZE: Winner will be notified (“Win Notification”) Via FB by the Sponsor and will haVe 4 days after the Win Notification to contact the Sponsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard
    Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 Railyard Alternatives & i-280 Boulevard (rab) Feasibility Study Phase I: Preliminary Options Analysis San Francisco Planning Department San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority Board of Directors April 5, 2016 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 22 About the study 2 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 3 Background: Why This Study NOW - Major Pieces of New Infrastructure planned Caltrain Electrification High-Speed Rail (HSR) Downtown Rail Extension (DTX) Transbay Transit Center (under construction Jan 2016) Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 3 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 4 Background: California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) – 2016 Draft Business Plan . Silicon Valley to Central Valley – Operational by 2025 – San Jose – North of Bakersfield – $20.7Billion – Fully Funded . Extension to San Francisco and Bakersfield – Operational by 2025 – Additional $2.9Billion . San Francisco – LA/Anaheim – Operational by 2029 Source: CHSRA 2016 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 5 Potential Grade-Separation of 16th Street Potential Grade-Separation of Mission Bay Drive Source: CHSRA, 2010 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 6 Challenges tHat Face San Francisco Coordinate Partner Efforts Knit together City Fabric Improve Local and Regional Connections Consideration of Benefits/Impacts Opportunities for Housing, Open Space, and Jobs Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 7 Study goals . Understand and coordinate the projects holistically. Help shape the urban environment for the public’s benefit. Photo: Manu Cornet Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 8 8 Study COMPONENTS 8 Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 9 RAB STUDY COMPONENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Themenparks Re-Made in Japan. Ein Reisebericht
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hoffmann, Ute Working Paper Themenparks re-made in Japan: Ein Reisebericht WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-102 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hoffmann, Ute (2002) : Themenparks re-made in Japan: Ein Reisebericht, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-102, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookfield Properties' Retail Group Overview
    Retail Overview Brookfield Properties’ Retail Group Overview We are Great Gathering Places. We embrace our cultural core values of Humility, Attitude, Do The Right Thing, H Together and Own It. HUMILITY Brookfield Properties’ retail group is a company focused A ATTITUDE exclusively on managing, leasing, and redeveloping high- quality retail properties throughout the United States. D DO THE RIGHT THING T TOGETHER O HEADQUARTERS CHICAGO OWN IT RETAIL PROPERTIES 160+ STATES 42 INLINE & FREESTANDING GLA 68 MILLION SQ FT TOTAL RETAIL GLA 145 MILLION SQ FT PROFORMA EQUITY MARKET CAP $20 BILLION PROFORMA ENTERPRISE VALUE $40 BILLION Portfolio Map 2 7 1 4 3 5 3 6 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 10 4 2 5 1 4 10 2 3 3 1 48 91 6 5 6 2 7 6 4 5 11 7 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 7 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 5 3 4 15 19 2 14 11 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 6 2 1 3 4 18 2 17 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 5 3 6 8 2 1 12 9 7 5 1 4 3 1 2 1 2 16 3 4 13 3 1 2 6 1 7 9 1 10 5 4 2 1 4 6 11 5 3 6 2 Portfolio Properties 1 2 3 3 3 1 7 4 Offices 13 12 2 Atlanta, GA 7 3 1 1 Chicago, IL Baltimore, MD 8 5 2 Dallas, TX 4 Los Angeles, CA 6 New York, NY 8 2 9 5 Property Listings by State ALABAMA 7 The Oaks Mall • Gainesville 3 The Mall in Columbia • Columbia (Baltimore) 9 Brookfield Place • Manhattan WASHINGTON 8 Pembroke Lakes Mall • Pembroke Pines 4 Mondawmin Mall • Baltimore 10 Manhattan West • Manhattan 1 Riverchase Galleria • Hoover (Birmingham) 1 Alderwood • Lynnwood (Seattle) 5 Towson Town Center • Towson (Baltimore) 11 Staten Island Mall • Staten Island 2 The Shoppes at Bel Air • Mobile (Fort Lauderdale)
    [Show full text]
  • As Time Goes By
    Palo Vol. XXVIII, Number 95 • Wednesday, September 5, 2007 ■ 50¢ Alto Midtown to lose route 88 Page 3 www.PaloAltoOnline.comw ww.PaloAltoO nline.com As time goes by For local businesses, old-fashioned style far from outdated Page 17 Marjan Sadoughi Marjan Talk about the news at Town Square, www.PaloAltoOnline.com ■ Upfront School district seeks funding for biotech lab Page 3 ■ Title Pages An elephant’s tale Page 21 ■ Sports Gunn’s big win highlights prep football openers Page 25 apr.com It's just one click to a complete list of virtually all homes for sale in the Bay Area. PALO ALTO Absolutely lovely North Palo Alto 4bd/2.5ba home with wonderful remodeled kitchen. Hardwood floors, over 9300+/- sf lot with mature landscaping. Fabulous neighborhood. $1,895,000 LOS ALTOS Rare Woodland Acres opportunity. Ranch style 5bd/3ba home on meandering tree-lined street. Separate dining room and grand formal living room. This lovely home has 3061+/-sf of living space on a 10081+/-sf lot. $1,750,000 PALO ALTO Delightful 3 bedroom, 2 bath home on a quiet cul- de-sac. Updated kitchen and baths. Spacious, beautifully landscaped lot. Excellent Palo Alto schools. $1,195,000 apr.com | PALO ALTO OFFICE 578 University Avenue 650.323.1111 APR COUNTIES | Santa Clara | San Mateo | San Francisco | Alameda | Contra Costa | Monterey | Santa Cruz Page 2 • Wednesday, September 5, 2007 • Palo Alto Weekly UpfrontLocal news, information and analysis Midtown to lose route 88 bus line Valley Transportation Authority chine — the VTA Comprehensive gether along Louis Road, with the construction, either.
    [Show full text]