Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill ARMED FORCES BILL Second Sitting Tuesday 15 February 2011 (Morning) CONTENTS CLAUSE 2 agreed to. Adjourned till this day at ten minutes past Two o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 122) 2010 - 2011 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 19 February 2011 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 31 Select Committee on the15 FEBRUARY 2011 Armed Forces Bill 32 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chair: MR JAMES ARBUTHNOT † Cunningham, Alex (Stockton North) (Lab) † Osborne, Sandra (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) (Lab) † Docherty, Thomas (Dunfermline and West Fife) † Pincher, Christopher (Tamworth) (Con) (Lab) † Robathan, Mr Andrew (Parliamentary Under- † Doyle, Gemma (West Dunbartonshire) (Lab/Co-op) Secretary of State for Defence) † Ellwood, Mr Tobias (Bournemouth East) (Con) † Russell, Bob (Colchester) (LD) † Francois, Mr Mark (Vice-Chamberlain of Her † Wright, David (Telford) (Lab) Majesty’s Household) † Jones, Mr Kevan (North Durham) (Lab) Georgina Holmes-Skelton, Committee Clerk † Lancaster, Mark (Milton Keynes North) (Con) † Lopresti, Jack (Filton and Bradley Stoke) (Con) † attended the Committee 33 Select Committee on theHOUSE OF COMMONS Armed Forces Bill 34 Member for North Durham will find that the discrepancies Select Committee on the identified by the hon. Member for Dunfermline and Armed Forces Bill West Fife are fairly minor and technical. I do not think they will necessarily lead to huge concerns. Tuesday 15 February 2011 The Chair: I think the Minister might wish to hear again whether 6 o’clock is the appropriate time for him (Morning) to have mentioned. As he taking inspiration on that point— [MR JAMES ARBUTHNOT in the Chair] Mr Robathan: Further to that point of order, Armed Forces Bill Mr Arbuthnot. I am sorry—I hear, hot off the press, that the hon. Gentleman will get the memorandum by 2 pm. 10.10 am Thomas Docherty (Dunfermline and West Fife) (Lab): On a point of order, Mr Arbuthnot. I have given the Clause 2 Minister prior notice of this. You will recall that a fortnight ago the civil servants promised to write to the ARMED FORCES COVENANT REPORT Committee about why there were some minor differences between civilian rules on breathalysing and drug testing Gemma Doyle (West Dunbartonshire) (Lab/Co-op): I after an incident, and military rules. The civil servants beg to move amendment 3, in clause 2, page 2, leave out still have not given us an answer. We have moved on to lines 11 and 12 and insert— consideration of the Bill and are out of time to table (a) education; amendments. Could the Minister inquire as to why the civil servants have been unable to give us an answer? (b) accommodation; (c) healthcare; The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (d) mental healthcare; (Mr Andrew Robathan): Further to that point of order, (e) pensions and benefits; Mr Arbuthnot. I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving (f) employment and training; me notice of that point of order some eight minutes (g) support for reservists and their employers; ago. I spoke to officials and was distressed to discover (h) the running of the Armed Forces Compensation that a memorandum has been written but is somewhere Scheme; in the bureaucratic chain. That is not an excuse; I put it (i) progress on armed forces rehabilitation services; and forward as the reason. I have given instructions that the (j) other such fields as the External Reference Group may memorandum should reach the hon. Gentleman by the determine.’. end of play today. If it does not, I shall want to know why not. The Chair: With this it will be convenient to discuss amendment 1, in clause 2, page 2, line 12, at end Mr Kevan Jones (North Durham) (Lab): Further to insert— that point of order, Mr Arbuthnot. May I seek your ‘(2A) The armed forces covenant report must also include advice? Clearly, we shall reach the parts of the Bill that analysis of the effects of membership, or former membership, of cover these changes on Thursday. If we have not received the reserve forces in such fields as the Secretary of State may that memorandum by the end of today, how can we determine.’. table any amendments that may be necessary? Gemma Doyle: As the Bill stands, only health, education The Chair: Amendments for Thursday had to be and housing are specifically cited as issues that the tabled by close of play yesterday, but in a circumstance report on the covenant should cover. I do not think that such as this it is within the discretion of the Chair to sufficient. The list set out in amendment 3 is more allow late amendments, and I would be very amenable comprehensive and more appropriately reflects the Secretary to using such discretion in this case. of State’s own responsibilities. The Minister or the Secretary of State may not be keen to be directed by this Mr Jones: Further to that point of order, Mr Arbuthnot. amendment, but when the Conservatives were in opposition That is very helpful, but if we get the memorandum they were only too pleased to speak at length about all tonight, what is the latest point at which we can table the things they promised they would do for our armed amendments? forces when they got into government. The same was true of the Lib Dems. Now they find themselves in Mr Robathan: Further to that point of order, office together, neither seems willing to take detailed Mr Arbuthnot. The House will be sitting until 10 o’clock and practical action. The alternative that the Minister this evening, and you have said that you would be has to offer is, in the words of the chairman of the sympathetic to late amendments being tabled. I am glad Forces Pension Society, to say that my civil servants do not normally work until “all flute music and arm waving.” 10 in the evening. They work more normal hours and I As a flautist myself I have nothing against flute music, would expect their response to come at the latest—they but I would suggest that it has its place—which is not are listening—by 6 o’clock this evening. I think the hon. anywhere near the armed forces covenant. It is perhaps 35 Select Committee on the15 FEBRUARY 2011 Armed Forces Bill 36 of no great surprise that MOD Ministers are not keen We heard in evidence last week from Dawn McCafferty to talk about pensions, allowances and employment that her organisation, the RAF Families Federation, right now. was not consulted about what the Bill should contain. The Minister said last Thursday that the charities from 10.15 am which we have heard told us that they had been consulted. Weheard evidence last Thursday from service charities—in I want to clarify that they said they had been consulted particular from Tony Stables of the Confederation of on a first, very rough draft of the covenant, which was British Service and Ex Service Organisations—from the described as “weak”, but not on the Bill. Amendment 3 armed forces families federations and from the Forces expands the matters that are to be covered to include Pension Society that a move to expand the list of issues mental health care, pensions and benefits, and employment set out in the Bill would be welcome, and that the and training. Secretary of State should not report on the work of other Departments without reporting on his own. It Mr Jones: Does my hon. Friend agree that when the would be bizarre if we had a report that criticised local charities referred to the covenant, they were not talking authoritiesortheDepartmentforEducationfordisadvantaging about the Bill but to another document, which we the children of servicemen and women, but that made assume will appear at some time in the future, called the no reference to the MOD’s responsibilities. Conservative covenant? Exactly how that relates to the Bill is not Members have expressed disappointment over the fact clear either to the Committee or to the service charities. that reservists are not even mentioned in the Bill, and I agree that the particular challenges they face should be considered. Gemma Doyle: My hon. Friend makes a good point. In Thursday’s sitting we finally had a clarification that Benefits paid to former serving personnel—for example, there will be two different documents: the report on the under the armed forces compensation scheme—have covenant and the covenant itself. Unfortunately, the Bill been the subject of great interest in previous years. has given us no scope to consider what the covenant There is also a huge amount of interest in armed forces should contain.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 553 20 November 2012 No. 71 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 20 November 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 421 20 NOVEMBER 2012 422 Mr Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight) (Con): Two weeks House of Commons ago, the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, my hon. Friend the Member for Norwich North (Miss Tuesday 20 November 2012 Smith), gave evidence to the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, and said that political and constitutional reforms were worth while only when The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock there was a public appetite for them. Does the Deputy Prime Minister think there is a public appetite for any PRAYERS of the proposals he has just mentioned? The Deputy Prime Minister: Clearly, the priority for [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] all of us is to repair, rescue and reform the damaged British economy—the legacy left to us by Labour—but BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS I have always been of the view that that does not mean that the Government cannot do more than two things at CITY OF LONDON (VARIOUS POWERS)BILL [LORDS] once. Those things could include mayoral elections, (BY ORDER) police and crime commissioner elections—which I know Second Reading opposed and deferred until Tuesday are close to the heart of the hon. Gentleman’s party—or 27 November (Standing Order No. 20). other political reform enthusiasms shared by my party.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps Mps and Meps: Session 4 11 May 2012 Msps: Current Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs MPs and MEPs: Session 4 11 May 2012 MSPs: Current Series This Fact Sheet provides a list of current Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs), Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represent. Abbreviations used: Scottish Parliament and European Parliament Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour Party LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party UK Parliament Con Conservative and Unionist Party Co-op Co-operative Party Lab Labour Party LD Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party Scottish Parliament and Westminster constituencies do not cover the same areas, although the names of the constituencies may be the same or similar. At the May 2005 general election, the number of Westminster constituencies was reduced from 72 to 59, which led to changes in constituency boundaries. Details of these changes can be found on the Boundary Commission’s website at www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/westminster Scottish Parliament Constituencies Constituency MSP Party Aberdeen Central Kevin Stewart SNP Aberdeen Donside Brian Adam SNP Aberdeen South and North Maureen Watt SNP Kincardine Aberdeenshire East Alex Salmond SNP Aberdeenshire West Dennis Robertson SNP Airdrie and Shotts Alex Neil SNP Almond Valley Angela
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Labour at a Crossroads: What Next?
    Scottish Labour at a crossroads: what next? As the Scottish Labour Party moves to elect its seventh leader in a decade, FTI Consulting’s Public Affairs Team sheds light on the two candidates for the top job, and considers the implications for the future of the beleaguered party in Scotland and the wider consequences for UK Labour. A shock to the system Key Dates: Whilst Scottish Labour Party insiders had been expecting a Sunday 17 Sept - Candidate nominations possible challenge to Kezia Dugdale’s leadership, not even her close closest advisers saw her shock departure coming when it did. Monday 9 October - Last date to register to The party membership reacted with genuine sadness to see vote Dugdale go, but also with weariness following two general Friday 13 October - Last date for supporting nominations from local Labour elections, one Holyrood election, Scotland-wide local authority parties and affiliated organisations elections, two constitutional referendums, two UK leadership Friday 27 October - Ballot opens elections and now the resignation of the third Scottish Labour Friday 17 November - Ballot closes Leader all in three years. After a tumultuous period, there is a Saturday 18 November - Result real appetite for stability. announced Arguably leaving at the worst possible time for moderates in the UK Labour Party, Dugdale resigned with immediate effect, instead of staying on until a new leader is elected. She vacates her valuable seat on the NEC, just before Labour conference makes crucial decisions on the so called ‘McDonnell amendment’, which the left of the party are attempting to pass to make it easier to get a candidate on the ballot paper in any future leadership election.
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th May 2015
    Weekly e Briefing: 15 May 2015 Welcome to the Commissioner’s weekly horizon scanning brief: 1. Legislation (Legislation, Home Office, APCC, press comments, reports and campaigns relating to strategy, policy and programmes) 2. Strategic policing and crime news (relevant crime and criminal justice information and partners’ policy/reports/campaigns) 3. Developments and reports (covering research across political, economic, social, technological, environmental and organisations) 4. Consultations (police and crime bulletins, research, consultations and press releases) 5. Reviews and Inspections (covering various reviews, inspections and audits across policing) Contact Officer: [email protected] 1. Legislation General Election 2015 Completed update on the new MPs. Immigration Act 2014: appeals 'Legal highs' to be banned under temporary power Historic law to end Modern Slavery passed The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 (Risk of Being Drawn into Terrorism) (Amendment and Guidance) Regulations 2015 Serious Crime Bill: overarching documents New rules to crackdown on violent prisoners comes into force Bill on PCC recall Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 2. Strategic policing and crime news Her Majesty's Government: May 2015 The government appointments have been confirmed as at 14 May 2015. Counter-Extremism Bill - National Security Council meeting 15 May 2015 Weekly e Briefing: At the first meeting of the new National Security Council (NSC) plans for a new Counter- Extremism Bill will be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons the Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill
    House of Commons The Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill The Armed Forces Bill Special Report of Session 2010–11 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 8 March 2011 HC 779 Published on 10 March 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill The Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill was appointed by an Order of the House of Commons to consider the Armed Forces Bill. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Alex Cunningham MP (Labour, Stockton North) Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Mr Tobias Ellwood MP (Conservative, Bournemouth East) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, North Durham) Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, Milton Keynes North) Jack Lopresti MP (Labour, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, South Leicestershire) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers Extract from the Votes and Proceedings, 10 January 2011: “Armed Forces Bill,—Ordered, That the following provisions shall apply to the Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill: 1. The Committee shall have 14 members, to be nominated by the Committee of Selection. 2. The Committee shall have power— (a) to send for persons, papers and records,
    [Show full text]
  • Snp Hypocrisy on Living Wage - Submitted by Leader of the Council John Mcginty
    11. NOTICE OF MOTION - SNP HYPOCRISY ON LIVING WAGE - SUBMITTED BY LEADER OF THE COUNCIL JOHN MCGINTY The Council considered a motion submitted by Leader of the Council John McGinty in the following terms:- “West Lothian Council recalls the WLC SNP Group claiming to have an interest in expanding the Living Wage in West Lothian despite having voted twice to deny it to their own workforce. Council is therefore disappointed, but not surprised to note that an amendment to the Procurement Reform Bill proposed by opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament which would have promoted the payment of the Living Wage to workers on public sector contracts was voted down by SNP members of the Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee. Council further notes that the SNP MSP’s concerned, Maureen Watt MSP, Adam Ingram MSP, Gordon MacDonald MSP and Jim Eadie MSP have all previously publicly supported the Living Wage. Council condemns this SNP hypocrisy over the Living Wage, notes that the actions of these MSP’s have blocked the opportunity to extend the Living Wage to workers on public sector contracts, and welcomes the statement by opposition parties that they intend to bring back the Living Wage amendment at the third and final stage of the Procurement Bill.” Moved by Leader of the Council John McGinty, seconded by Councillor Muldoon. Amendment West Lothian Council congratulates Cllr. McGinty on his perfectly timed 1st April motion and asserts; “Dinna laugh, dinna smile, hunt the gowk another mile” Council dismisses Labour’s wholly unfounded attacks upon the SNP position in respect of low pay and poverty and with regards to the serious issue of West Lothian Council SNP Group’s actions in respect of low pay council notes; x 1995 – 2007 – under successive Labour council administrations no action whatsoever was taken in respect of council pay scales in relation to low paid staff.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review, the Year Ahead
    2017: A YEAR IN REVIEW, 2018: THE YEAR AHEAD 2017: A YEAR IN REVIEW, 2018: THE YEAR AHEAD Introduction from Alex Deane, UK Head of Public Affairs 2017 was the most unpredictable and tumultuous year in politics since… 2016. A snap election; a Tory campaign gone awry; Corbyn adept and relatively successful; challenges to capitalism; crucial Brexit summit after crucial Brexit summit. With the exception of a snap election – something the Prime Minister seems rather unlikely to repeat – it seems that 2018 may very well hold much of the same. In the snapshots that follow from the FTI UK Public Affairs team, we hope that you find food for thought about what may await us in 2018. I think that there are three broad themes to contemplate: Brexit: even the most fanatical of political obsessives might be feeling a touch of fatigue by now – if that describes your feeling, I’m afraid that I bring scant comfort. We are still in the foothills of the Brexit process, with well-established EU negotiating precedents pointing to resolutions being reached in the 59th minute of the 11th hour. That of course means that we may enjoy or endure a whole year of Brexit jostling in 2018 without positions actually being finalised until Q1 2019. Nationalism: John McDonnell told the Labour Party Conference, “have no doubt: rail, water, energy, the Royal Mail: we are taking them back”. The Conservative Party did not address Labour’s economic agenda during the 2017 General Election, wrongly thinking that relying on mistrust of Corbyn and talk of a “magic money tree” would deliver success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of the Department of Energy and Climate Change
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee The Work of the Department of Energy and Climate Change Oral evidence Wednesday 15 September 2010 Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Moira Wallace OBE, Permanent Secretary, DECC, Phil Wynn Owen, Director General, National Climate Change and Consumer Support, and Jonathan Brearley, Director, Energy Strategy and Futures Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 15 September 2010 HC 474-i Published on 16 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £5.50 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Election Results
    GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS CONSTITUENCY INCUMBENT PARTY WINNING CANDIDATE PARTY MAJORITY GAIN/HOLD Aberavon Hywel Francis Lab Stephen Kinnock Lab 10,445 HOLD Aberconwy Guto Bebb Con Guto Bebb Con 3,999 HOLD Aberdeen North Frank Doran Lab Kirsty Blackman SNP 13,396 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aberdeen South Anne Begg Lab Callum McCaig SNP 7,230 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Airdrie and Shotts Pamela Nash Lab Neil Gray SNP 8,779 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aldershot Gerald Howarth Con Gerald Howarth Con 14,901 HOLD Aldridge-Brownhills Richard Shepherd Con Wendy Morton Con 11,723 HOLD Altrincham and Sale West Graham Brady Con Graham Brady Con 13,290 HOLD Alyn and Deeside Mark Tami Lab Mark Tami Lab 3,343 HOLD Amber Valley Nigel Mills Con Nigel Mills Con 4,205 HOLD Angus Michael Weir SNP Michael Weir SNP 11,230 HOLD Arfon Hywel Williams PC Hywel Williams PC 3,668 HOLD Argyll and Bute Alan Reid Lib Dem Brendan O'Hara SNP 8,473 SNP GAIN FROM LIB DEM Arundel and South Downs Nick Herbert Con Nick Herbert Con 26,177 HOLD prepared by connect intelligence 1 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS Ashfield Gloria De Piero Lab Gloria De Piero Lab 8,820 HOLD Ashford Damian Green Con Damian Green Con 19,296 HOLD Ashton-under-Lyne David Heyes Lab Angela Rayner Lab 10,756 HOLD Aylesbury David Lidington Con David Lidington Con 17,158 HOLD Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock Sandra Osborne Lab Corri Wilson SNP 11,265 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Banbury Tony Baldry Con Victoria Prentis Con 18,395 HOLD Banff and Buchan Eilidh Whiteford SNP Eilidh Whiteford SNP
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to UK Policy Shapers and Influencers 2014 UK Government Departments Handbook
    Guide to UK Policy Shapers and Influencers 2014 UK Government Departments Handbook Oliver O'Hanlon 2014 0 Contents Page Department Page Number Overview of Departmental Policy Programmes 2-3 Cabinet Office 4-5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6-8 Department for Communities and Local Government 9 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 10 Department for Education 11-12 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 13 Department for International Development 14 Department for Transport 15 Department for Work and Pensions 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 17 Department of Health 18-19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20-21 Her Majesty’s Treasury 22-23 Home Office 24-25 Ministry of Defence 26-27 Ministry of Justice 28 Northern Ireland Office and Northern Ireland Assembly 29-30 Scotland Office and Scottish Government 31-32 Wales Office and Welsh Government 33-34 Current Bills and Legislation going through Parliament 35 Leader of the Opposition Staff and Support team 36 Other relevant agencies and public bodies 37-40 Parliamentary Select Committees 41-42 Associate and All Party Parliamentary Groups 43 Departmental and Devolved Administration Chief Scientific Advisors 44 1 Overview of Departmental Policy Programmes The below is a summary and link to the major policy areas and programmes across all Government Departments. Cabinet Office Social Mobility, Government efficiency, transparency and accountability Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Business and Enterprise, Further Education and Skills, Higher Education,
    [Show full text]
  • How to Run a Country a Parliament of Lawmakers
    How to run a country A Parliament of lawmakers Camilla Hagelund Jonathan Goddard March 2015 How to run a country A Parliament of lawmakers Camilla Hagelund Jonathan Goddard March 2015 Reform Reform is an independent, non-party think tank whose mission is to set out a better way to deliver public services and economic prosperity. Reform is a registered charity, the Reform Research Trust, charity no. 1103739. This publication is the property of the Reform Research Trust. We believe that by reforming the public sector, increasing investment and extending choice, high quality services can be made available for everyone. Our vision is of a Britain with 21st Century healthcare, high standards in schools, a modern and efficient transport system, safe streets, and a free, dynamic and competitive economy. 1 Contents Forewords 3 Graham Brady MP 3 Tom Brake MP 4 Paul Flynn MP 5 Executive summary 6 Introduction 9 1 The case for reform 11 1.1 A deficit of expertise 13 1.2 Excessively partisan 13 1.3 Limited progress 15 1.4 Delegated legislation and the great escape from scrutiny 17 2 Reform of the committee system 19 2.1 Legislative scrutiny entrusted to permanent, specialised select committees 20 2.2 Splitting and extending the committee stage 22 2.3 Provide for better scrutiny of delegated legislation 24 2.4 Enabling use of subcommittees 25 2.5 Accommodating variation in workload 26 2.6 Select committee size 29 2.7 Remuneration and professionalisation 34 2.8 Size of Parliament 38 2.9 Staffing 40 2.10 The payroll vote 40 3 Implications for the constituency role of MPs 43 Appendix A – Committee stage scrutiny 47 Appendix B – Select committee workload case studies 50 Appendix C – Turnover of departmental select committee members 56 Bibliography 66 2 A Parliament of lawmakers / Forewords Forewords Graham Brady MP Only a third of the public think Parliament effective in holding government to account: two thirds want improvement of our democratic institutions.
    [Show full text]