Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Tuesday Volume 553 20 November 2012 No. 71 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 20 November 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 421 20 NOVEMBER 2012 422 Mr Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight) (Con): Two weeks House of Commons ago, the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, my hon. Friend the Member for Norwich North (Miss Tuesday 20 November 2012 Smith), gave evidence to the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, and said that political and constitutional reforms were worth while only when The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock there was a public appetite for them. Does the Deputy Prime Minister think there is a public appetite for any PRAYERS of the proposals he has just mentioned? The Deputy Prime Minister: Clearly, the priority for [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] all of us is to repair, rescue and reform the damaged British economy—the legacy left to us by Labour—but BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS I have always been of the view that that does not mean that the Government cannot do more than two things at CITY OF LONDON (VARIOUS POWERS)BILL [LORDS] once. Those things could include mayoral elections, (BY ORDER) police and crime commissioner elections—which I know Second Reading opposed and deferred until Tuesday are close to the heart of the hon. Gentleman’s party—or 27 November (Standing Order No. 20). other political reform enthusiasms shared by my party. Those are all things that we have tried to advance over the past two and a half years. Oral Answers to Questions Ms Margaret Ritchie (South Down) (SDLP): In the light of the Prime Minister’s visit to Northern Ireland today in advance of negotiations in Brussels and other DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER possible announcements, and of the recent report on tax arrangements in Wales, will the Deputy Prime Minister tell us what discussions have taken place, or will take The Deputy Prime Minister was asked— place, with the Northern Ireland Executive on the further devolution of powers to the Executive? Constitutional Reform The Deputy Prime Minister: As the hon. Lady knows, 1. Gemma Doyle (West Dunbartonshire) (Lab/Co-op): the proposals in Wales have been put forward on the What the Government’s political and constitutional back of the report published by the Silk commission reform priorities are for the remainder of this Parliament. this week, which advocates further tax devolution to [128848] Wales. We have said that we will look closely at those proposals. She will also be well aware that there is a The Deputy Prime Minister (Mr Nick Clegg): The long-standing debate in Northern Ireland about the Government have already introduced fixed-term Parliaments, freedom to set corporation tax rates, which would involve a significant constitutional change, and given people a a different arrangement from the one that we have now. say on the voting system for this House, as well as We have undertaken to look at that very carefully overseeing significant transfers of power to both Scotland indeed, and there has been a succession of discussions and Wales. We also have radical measures in train to and ministerial meetings on the matter. We will arrive at shift power from the centre to local decision makers, a definitive conclusion soon enough. including the recently enacted Local Government Finance Act 2012 and the second wave of city deals, which will Sir Robert Smith (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) accelerate the pace of decentralisation as well as unlocking (LD): One item on the Deputy Prime Minister’s list of new and innovative ways to drive growth. Work also priorities was party funding. Is it not crucial, in the light continues on party funding, recall and lobbying reform. of the lessons that we can learn from the American presidential election, that the parties in this country Gemma Doyle: I thank the Deputy Prime Minister should come together and agree on a sensible measure for that answer, but he has horse-traded with his coalition of party funding, so that we can have a balanced partner on Lords reform, electoral registration, our electoral system that means all the people getting involved electoral system, and boundary changes. Does he not in the elections? agree that the country deserves a better collection of policies than those that simply serve an individual party’s needs? The Deputy Prime Minister: I strongly agree with my hon. Friend. I do not think that anybody, on either side The Deputy Prime Minister: That is a slightly curious of the House, would want to see our politics being allegation coming from a member of a party that had a hollowed out by big money as has clearly happened in manifesto commitment to hold a referendum on the the United States. That is why cross-party talks are alternative vote yet barely lifted a finger to campaign going on at the moment, although agreement has not for it when it was possible to do so, and that has had a yet been reached. We are all familiar with the difficulties manifesto commitment for an elected House of Lords involved. It will require a bit of political will and a bit of for years but has done even less to make that a reality. political courage to reach cross-party agreement, but I Perhaps the hon. Lady should practise what she preaches. hope that we will be able to do that as soon as possible. 423 Oral Answers20 NOVEMBER 2012 Oral Answers 424 Ms Harriet Harman (Camberwell and Peckham) (Lab): Lorely Burt: For some, life in politics can be a bit like I note the absence of the elections for police and crime a jungle, and a popular vote may help to decide whether commissioners from the Deputy Prime Minister’s list of or not someone should stay. When a Member of this his Government’s constitutional reforms. Those elections House is found guilty of serious wrongdoing and does ended up costing £25 million more because he did not not walk away themselves, should not a popular vote by want them to be held on the same day as the May their constituents provide a chance to “get them out of council elections next year. Will he admit that, in order there”? to try to give the Lib Dems a better chance next May, he has wasted an extra £25 million of public money? The Deputy Prime Minister: Obviously, the devil is in the detail, and the issue is how we as a House define what The Deputy Prime Minister: I know the right hon. serious wrongdoing is. I never thought that disappearing and learned Lady is feeling sore that so many Labour to a jungle on the other side of the planet would be one has-been politicians did not get elected. [Interruption.] of the things we would have to grapple with on this I know it was not a good day for Deputy Prime Ministers, recall issue. I very much hope to make progress, and we past or present, and I admit that. Honestly, she knows are certainly working actively in government to achieve as well as I do that there was a mayoral contest and it. It was a manifesto commitment of all the main Westminster by-elections as well as local by-elections all parties in this Parliament to introduce a recall mechanism, on the same day. Is she now going to start blaming the but to do that we need to arrive at a common understanding November weather for the poor showing of her party at of what constitutes serious wrongdoing and what does the police and crime commissioner elections? That is not. beneath her. Claire Perry: If I may press the Deputy Prime Minister Ms Harman: I do not know why the right hon. a little further, does his reply not suggest that it is up to Gentleman is drawing attention to last Thursday’s results Parliament to define serious wrongdoing, which might because on the showing of his party in the Corby give the impression to constituents that it is a case of by-election, it will need more than a change of date to the poacher turning gamekeeper? Surely it should be up save his party’s fortunes. Will he not admit that no one to the majority of our constituents, perhaps through wanted these police and crime commissioner elections, some sort of referendum, to decide what constitutes whatever the weather, that they were a complete shambles wrongdoing. Whether it be crossing the Floor, disappearing and that the money should have been spent on front-line and not helping constituents, being found guilty of policing instead? fraud or whatever, it is surely our constituents’ job to determine that. The Deputy Prime Minister: If the right hon. and learned Lady dislikes the PCC elections so much, why The Deputy Prime Minister: We have said that there is did her party put up candidates across the country? a sort of double trigger. First, whether in law or otherwise, [Interruption.] I hear “She had to” from a sedentary we need some kind of approximate understanding of position, but no one forced her to put up as candidates what constitutes serious wrongdoing. I do not think the recycled Labour ex-Ministers who then failed to get anyone would want this recall mechanism to be triggered elected. No one obliged her to do that. I really think the for frivolous reasons or for partisan point scoring.
Recommended publications
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps Mps and Meps: Session 4 11 May 2012 Msps: Current Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs MPs and MEPs: Session 4 11 May 2012 MSPs: Current Series This Fact Sheet provides a list of current Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs), Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represent. Abbreviations used: Scottish Parliament and European Parliament Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour Party LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party UK Parliament Con Conservative and Unionist Party Co-op Co-operative Party Lab Labour Party LD Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party Scottish Parliament and Westminster constituencies do not cover the same areas, although the names of the constituencies may be the same or similar. At the May 2005 general election, the number of Westminster constituencies was reduced from 72 to 59, which led to changes in constituency boundaries. Details of these changes can be found on the Boundary Commission’s website at www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/westminster Scottish Parliament Constituencies Constituency MSP Party Aberdeen Central Kevin Stewart SNP Aberdeen Donside Brian Adam SNP Aberdeen South and North Maureen Watt SNP Kincardine Aberdeenshire East Alex Salmond SNP Aberdeenshire West Dennis Robertson SNP Airdrie and Shotts Alex Neil SNP Almond Valley Angela
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Labour at a Crossroads: What Next?
    Scottish Labour at a crossroads: what next? As the Scottish Labour Party moves to elect its seventh leader in a decade, FTI Consulting’s Public Affairs Team sheds light on the two candidates for the top job, and considers the implications for the future of the beleaguered party in Scotland and the wider consequences for UK Labour. A shock to the system Key Dates: Whilst Scottish Labour Party insiders had been expecting a Sunday 17 Sept - Candidate nominations possible challenge to Kezia Dugdale’s leadership, not even her close closest advisers saw her shock departure coming when it did. Monday 9 October - Last date to register to The party membership reacted with genuine sadness to see vote Dugdale go, but also with weariness following two general Friday 13 October - Last date for supporting nominations from local Labour elections, one Holyrood election, Scotland-wide local authority parties and affiliated organisations elections, two constitutional referendums, two UK leadership Friday 27 October - Ballot opens elections and now the resignation of the third Scottish Labour Friday 17 November - Ballot closes Leader all in three years. After a tumultuous period, there is a Saturday 18 November - Result real appetite for stability. announced Arguably leaving at the worst possible time for moderates in the UK Labour Party, Dugdale resigned with immediate effect, instead of staying on until a new leader is elected. She vacates her valuable seat on the NEC, just before Labour conference makes crucial decisions on the so called ‘McDonnell amendment’, which the left of the party are attempting to pass to make it easier to get a candidate on the ballot paper in any future leadership election.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report April 2010 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact: Planning Policy Team Communities, Regeneration & Environment Directorate Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council FREEPOST Stockport SK1 3YQ Telephone: 0161 474 4395 Fax: 0161 474 4586 Core Strategy DPD: Annexes to Sustainability Appraisal Report Annex 1 Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Stockport Core Strategy DPD Rapid Health Impact Assessment Screening Report Date: September 2009 (Reviewed January 2010) Author: Angie Jukes, BSc, MSc. Health & Environment Advisor (Planning) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Reviewed by: Dr Stephen Watkins, Director of Public Health, NHS Stockport Health Impact Assessment Team at NHS Stockport Planning Policy Team at Stockport MBC Stockport Local Strategic Partnership Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Stockport’s Local Development Framework 2.2 Why do Health Impact Assessment? 2.3 Sustainability Appraisal 2.4 HIA Methodology 2.5 A Health Portrait of Stockport 3.0 HIA Rapid Assessment Findings 3.1 Environmental Conditions 3.2 Socio Economic & Cultural Conditions 3.3 Social & Community Networks 3.4 Lifestyle 4.0 Conclusions & Recommendations to Policy Makers 4.1 Significant Issues 4.2 Health Prevention 4.3 Two birds with one stone 4.4 Recommendations 5.0 Consultation Process & Next Steps Appendix 1 NHS Stockport Pro Forma Drafted Application to Core Strategy Emerging Objectives & Policies 1.0 Executive Summary The Local Development Framework (LDF) incorporates the Core Strategy which is the most important document in the LDF because it sets an overall strategy and vision, establishing the broad aims and objectives for the use of land in Stockport.
    [Show full text]
  • Politic and Party Organisation in Oldham
    Durham E-Theses Politic and party organisation in Oldham Bickerstae, Derek How to cite: Bickerstae, Derek (1964) Politic and party organisation in Oldham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9701/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk POLITICS AND PARTY ORGANISATION IN OLDHAM 1852 - 1914 DEREK BICKERSTAPPE DISSERTATION PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OP MASTER OP ARTS The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. JANUARY 1964 In one sense all politics are provincial politicso What Peely Melbourne and Russell could do in the Houses of Parliament depended primarily on what happened in the constituencies. It is true that provincial politics were not immune from central influence» it is equally true that national politics were given their peculiar colour and flavour largely by provincial representatives and provincial interests and opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2001 Campaign Spending We Are an Independent Body That Was Set up by Parliament
    Election 2001 Campaign spending We are an independent body that was set up by Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the United Kingdom by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and regulating political parties. On 1 April 2002, The Boundary Committee for England (formerly the Local Government Commission for England) became a statutory committee of The Electoral Commission. Its duties include reviewing local election boundaries. © The Electoral Commission 2002 ISBN: 1-904363-08-3 1 Contents List of tables, appendices and returns 2 Conclusions 45 Preface 5 Political parties 45 Executive summary 7 Third parties 46 Spending by political parties 7 Candidates’ expenses 46 Spending by third parties 7 Future work programme 47 Spending by candidates 7 Introduction 9 Appendices The role of The Electoral Commission 10 Appendix 1 49 Campaign expenditure by political parties 11 Appendix 2 50 The spending limit 12 Appendix 3 87 Interpretation of legislation 12 Appendix 4 89 Public and media interest in the campaign 13 Appendix 5 90 Commission guidance 13 Appendix 6 97 Completing and reviewing the expenditure returns 13 Candidates’ election expenses at the Analysis of returns 14 2001 general election 99 Northern Ireland analysis 15 Great Britain analysis 17 Problems in categorising expenditure 18 Breakdown of total expenditure: the main three British parties 18 Other parties and trends 19 Apportionment and spending in England, Scotland
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th May 2015
    Weekly e Briefing: 15 May 2015 Welcome to the Commissioner’s weekly horizon scanning brief: 1. Legislation (Legislation, Home Office, APCC, press comments, reports and campaigns relating to strategy, policy and programmes) 2. Strategic policing and crime news (relevant crime and criminal justice information and partners’ policy/reports/campaigns) 3. Developments and reports (covering research across political, economic, social, technological, environmental and organisations) 4. Consultations (police and crime bulletins, research, consultations and press releases) 5. Reviews and Inspections (covering various reviews, inspections and audits across policing) Contact Officer: [email protected] 1. Legislation General Election 2015 Completed update on the new MPs. Immigration Act 2014: appeals 'Legal highs' to be banned under temporary power Historic law to end Modern Slavery passed The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 (Risk of Being Drawn into Terrorism) (Amendment and Guidance) Regulations 2015 Serious Crime Bill: overarching documents New rules to crackdown on violent prisoners comes into force Bill on PCC recall Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 2. Strategic policing and crime news Her Majesty's Government: May 2015 The government appointments have been confirmed as at 14 May 2015. Counter-Extremism Bill - National Security Council meeting 15 May 2015 Weekly e Briefing: At the first meeting of the new National Security Council (NSC) plans for a new Counter- Extremism Bill will be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons the Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill
    House of Commons The Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill The Armed Forces Bill Special Report of Session 2010–11 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 8 March 2011 HC 779 Published on 10 March 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill The Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill was appointed by an Order of the House of Commons to consider the Armed Forces Bill. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Alex Cunningham MP (Labour, Stockton North) Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Mr Tobias Ellwood MP (Conservative, Bournemouth East) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, North Durham) Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, Milton Keynes North) Jack Lopresti MP (Labour, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, South Leicestershire) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers Extract from the Votes and Proceedings, 10 January 2011: “Armed Forces Bill,—Ordered, That the following provisions shall apply to the Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill: 1. The Committee shall have 14 members, to be nominated by the Committee of Selection. 2. The Committee shall have power— (a) to send for persons, papers and records,
    [Show full text]
  • Snp Hypocrisy on Living Wage - Submitted by Leader of the Council John Mcginty
    11. NOTICE OF MOTION - SNP HYPOCRISY ON LIVING WAGE - SUBMITTED BY LEADER OF THE COUNCIL JOHN MCGINTY The Council considered a motion submitted by Leader of the Council John McGinty in the following terms:- “West Lothian Council recalls the WLC SNP Group claiming to have an interest in expanding the Living Wage in West Lothian despite having voted twice to deny it to their own workforce. Council is therefore disappointed, but not surprised to note that an amendment to the Procurement Reform Bill proposed by opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament which would have promoted the payment of the Living Wage to workers on public sector contracts was voted down by SNP members of the Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee. Council further notes that the SNP MSP’s concerned, Maureen Watt MSP, Adam Ingram MSP, Gordon MacDonald MSP and Jim Eadie MSP have all previously publicly supported the Living Wage. Council condemns this SNP hypocrisy over the Living Wage, notes that the actions of these MSP’s have blocked the opportunity to extend the Living Wage to workers on public sector contracts, and welcomes the statement by opposition parties that they intend to bring back the Living Wage amendment at the third and final stage of the Procurement Bill.” Moved by Leader of the Council John McGinty, seconded by Councillor Muldoon. Amendment West Lothian Council congratulates Cllr. McGinty on his perfectly timed 1st April motion and asserts; “Dinna laugh, dinna smile, hunt the gowk another mile” Council dismisses Labour’s wholly unfounded attacks upon the SNP position in respect of low pay and poverty and with regards to the serious issue of West Lothian Council SNP Group’s actions in respect of low pay council notes; x 1995 – 2007 – under successive Labour council administrations no action whatsoever was taken in respect of council pay scales in relation to low paid staff.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review, the Year Ahead
    2017: A YEAR IN REVIEW, 2018: THE YEAR AHEAD 2017: A YEAR IN REVIEW, 2018: THE YEAR AHEAD Introduction from Alex Deane, UK Head of Public Affairs 2017 was the most unpredictable and tumultuous year in politics since… 2016. A snap election; a Tory campaign gone awry; Corbyn adept and relatively successful; challenges to capitalism; crucial Brexit summit after crucial Brexit summit. With the exception of a snap election – something the Prime Minister seems rather unlikely to repeat – it seems that 2018 may very well hold much of the same. In the snapshots that follow from the FTI UK Public Affairs team, we hope that you find food for thought about what may await us in 2018. I think that there are three broad themes to contemplate: Brexit: even the most fanatical of political obsessives might be feeling a touch of fatigue by now – if that describes your feeling, I’m afraid that I bring scant comfort. We are still in the foothills of the Brexit process, with well-established EU negotiating precedents pointing to resolutions being reached in the 59th minute of the 11th hour. That of course means that we may enjoy or endure a whole year of Brexit jostling in 2018 without positions actually being finalised until Q1 2019. Nationalism: John McDonnell told the Labour Party Conference, “have no doubt: rail, water, energy, the Royal Mail: we are taking them back”. The Conservative Party did not address Labour’s economic agenda during the 2017 General Election, wrongly thinking that relying on mistrust of Corbyn and talk of a “magic money tree” would deliver success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of the Department of Energy and Climate Change
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee The Work of the Department of Energy and Climate Change Oral evidence Wednesday 15 September 2010 Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Moira Wallace OBE, Permanent Secretary, DECC, Phil Wynn Owen, Director General, National Climate Change and Consumer Support, and Jonathan Brearley, Director, Energy Strategy and Futures Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 15 September 2010 HC 474-i Published on 16 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £5.50 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Parliament
    Scotland's Parliament Fundamentals for a New Scotland Act Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: SCOlllSH DEVOLUTION : CONTEXT AND POLICY ........................................................................ 11 The Scottish Context .................................................................................................................................................... 13 The Conservative Response ....................................................................................................................................... 17 The Scottish Constitutional Convention ................................................................................................................ 19 The Constitution Unit's Agenda ............................................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 2: THE LESSONS OF THE PAST ...................................................................................................................23 History ...............................................................................................................................................................................24 Whitehall ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Parliament: The
    [Show full text]